Fujima N, Andreu-Arasa VC, Meibom SK, Mercier GA, Salama AR, Truong MT, Sakai O. Prediction of the treatment outcome using machine learning with FDG-PET image-based multiparametric approach in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
Clin Radiol 2021;
76:711.e1-711.e7. [PMID:
33934877 DOI:
10.1016/j.crad.2021.03.017]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM
To investigate the value of machine learning-based multiparametric analysis using 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) images to predict treatment outcome in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ninety-nine patients with OCSCC who received pretreatment integrated FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) were included. They were divided into the training (66 patients) and validation (33 patients) cohorts. The diagnosis of local control or local failure was obtained from patient's medical records. Conventional FDG-PET parameters, including the maximum and mean standardised uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), quantitative tumour morphological parameters, intratumoural histogram, and texture parameters, as well as T-stage and clinical stage, were evaluated by a machine learning analysis. The diagnostic ability of T-stage, clinical stage, and conventional FDG-PET parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLG) was also assessed separately.
RESULTS
In support-vector machine analysis of the training dataset, the final selected parameters were T-stage, SUVmax, TLG, morphological irregularity, entropy, and run-length non-uniformity. In the validation dataset, the diagnostic performance of the created algorithm was as follows: sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.7, positive predictive value 0.86, negative predictive value 0.64, and accuracy 0.79. In a univariate analysis using conventional FDG-PET parameters, T-stage and clinical stage, diagnostic accuracy of each variable was revealed as follows: 0.61 in T-stage, 0.61 in clinical stage, 0.64 in SUVmax, 0.61 in SUVmean, 0.64 in MTV, and 0.7 in TLG.
CONCLUSION
A machine-learning-based approach to analysing FDG-PET images by multiparametric analysis might help predict local control or failure in patients with OCSCC.
Collapse