Opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections who are unsuitable for beta-lactam antibiotics: a multicenter prospective observational study

Purpose:

The objective of this prospective, observational study was to describe the treatment, severity assessment and healthcare resources required for management of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections who were unsuitable for beta-lactam antibiotic treatments.

Methods:

Patients were enrolled across five secondary care National Health Service hospitals. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection and were considered unsuitable for beta-lactam antibiotics (e.g. confirmed/suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, beta-lactam allergy). Data regarding diagnosis, severity of the infection, antibiotic treatment and patient management were collected.

Results:

145 patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection were included; 79% (n = 115) patients received greater than two antibiotic regimens; median length of the first antibiotic regimen was 2 days (interquartile range of 1–5); median time to switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics was 4 days (interquartile range of 3–8, n = 72/107); 25% (n = 10/40) patients with Eron class 1 infection had systemic inflammatory response syndrome, suggesting they were misclassified. A higher proportion of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome received treatment in an inpatient setting, and their length of stay was prolonged in comparison with patients without systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Conclusion:

There exists an urgent need for more focused antimicrobial stewardship strategies and tools for standardised clinical assessment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection severity in patients who are unsuitable for beta-lactam antibiotics. This will lead to optimised antimicrobial treatment strategies and ensure effective healthcare resource utilisation.

Daptomycin: an evidence-based review of its role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections

Infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens remain a major public health burden and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Increasing rates of infection with Gram-positive bacteria and the emergence of resistance to commonly used antibiotics have led to the need for novel antibiotics. Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide with rapid bactericidal activity against a wide range of Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, has been shown to be effective and has a good safety profile for the approved indications of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (4 mg/kg/day), right-sided infective endocarditis caused by S. aureus, and bacteremia associated with complicated skin and soft tissue infections or right-sided infective endocarditis (6 mg/kg/day). Based on its pharmacokinetic profile and concentration-dependent bactericidal activity, high-dose (>6 mg/kg/day) daptomycin is considered an important treatment option in the management of various difficult-to-treat Gram-positive infections. Although daptomycin resistance has been documented, it remains uncommon despite the increasing use of daptomycin. To enhance activity and to minimize resistance, daptomycin in combination with other antibiotics has also been explored and found to be beneficial in certain severe infections. The availability of daptomycin via a 2-minute intravenous bolus facilitates its outpatient administration, providing an opportunity to reduce risk of health care-associated infections, improve patient satisfaction, and minimize health care costs. Daptomycin, not currently approved for use in the pediatric population, has been shown to be widely used for treating Gram-positive infections in children.

Real-world daptomycin use across wide geographical regions: results from a pooled analysis of CORE and EU-CORE

Background

Pooled data from two large registries, Cubicin^® Outcomes Registry and Experience (CORE; USA) and European Cubicin^® Outcomes Registry and Experience (EU-CORE; Europe, Latin America, and Asia), were analyzed to determine the characteristics and clinical outcomes of daptomycin therapy in patients with Gram-positive infections across wide geographical regions.

Methods

Patients receiving at least one dose of daptomycin between 2004 and 2012 for the treatment of Gram-positive infections were included. Clinical success was defined as an outcome of ‘cured’ or ‘improved’. Post-treatment follow-up data were collected for a subset of patients (CORE: osteomyelitis and orthopedic foreign body device infection; EU-CORE: endocarditis, intracardiac/intravascular device infection, osteomyelitis, and orthopedic device infection). Safety was assessed for up to 30 days after daptomycin treatment.

Results

In 11,557 patients (CORE, 5482; EU-CORE, 6075) treated with daptomycin (median age, 62 [range, 1–103] years), the most frequent underlying conditions were cardiovascular disease (54.7 %) and diabetes mellitus (28.0 %). The most commonly treated primary infections were complicated skin and soft tissue infection (cSSTI; 31.2 %) and bacteremia (21.8 %). The overall clinical success rate was 77.2 % (uncomplicated SSTI, 88.3 %; cSSTI, 81.0 %; osteomyelitis, 77.7 %; foreign body/prosthetic infection (FBPI), 75.9 %; endocarditis, 75.4 %; and bacteremia, 69.5 %). The clinical success rate was 79.1 % in patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections (MRSA, 78.1 %). An increasing trend of high-dose daptomycin (>6 mg/kg/day) prescribing pattern was observed over time. Clinical success rates were higher with high-dose daptomycin treatment for endocarditis and FBPI. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs possibly related to daptomycin therapy were reported in 628 (5.4 %) and 133 (1.2 %) patients, respectively.

Conclusions

The real-world data showed that daptomycin was effective and safe in the treatment of various Gram-positive infections, including those caused by resistant pathogens, across wide geographical regions.

Real-World Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections with Daptomycin: Results from a Large European Registry (EU-CORE)

Introduction

The objective of this analysis was to describe in real-life settings the clinical outcomes and safety associated with daptomycin treatment in a cohort of patients with complicated skin and soft tissues infection (cSSTI).

Methods

All patients with cSSTI who had received at least one dose of daptomycin between January 2006 and April 2012 were identified from a non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective registry (European Cubicin^® Outcome Registry and Experience; EU–CORE^SM).

Results

Of the 6075 patients included in the EU-CORE registry, 1927 (31.7%) were diagnosed with cSSTI (male, 63.8%; median age, 63 years). The most frequent underlying diseases were cardiovascular disease (58.1%) and diabetes mellitus (40.7%). The most frequent cSSTIs included surgical site infections (34.9%), wound infections (20.2%) and diabetic foot infections (19.9%). The most frequently prescribed doses of daptomycin were 4 mg/kg/day (38.9%) and 6 mg/kg/day (35.2%). A total of 1126 (58.4%) patients received antibiotics prior to daptomycin treatment; treatment failure (53.7%) was the most common reason for switching to daptomycin. The majority of hospitalized patients (61.8%) were treated with concomitant antibiotics. Among patients with positive cultures, Staphylococcus aureus (51.9%; 673/1297) was the most common pathogen. The overall clinical success rate was 84.6%; for infections caused by S. aureus, the success rate was 87.2% (methicillin susceptible, 87.8%; methicillin resistant, 87.0%). Adverse events possibly related to daptomycin treatment were reported in 2.4% of patients and adverse events led to drug discontinuation in 2.4% of patients.

Conclusion

Daptomycin treatment resulted in high clinical success rates in patients with different cSSTI subtypes, the majority of whom having failed previous antibiotic therapy. Daptomycin was well tolerated and there were no new or unexpected safety findings.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40121-015-0074-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Daptomycin in the Clinical Setting: 8-Year Experience with Gram-positive Bacterial Infections from the EU-CORE(SM) Registry

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety of daptomycin therapy in patients with serious Gram-positive infections.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled in the European Cubicin(®) Outcomes Registry and Experience (EU-CORE(SM)), a non-interventional, multicenter, observational registry. The real-world data were collected across 18 countries (Europe, Latin America, and Asia) for patients who had received at least one dose of daptomycin between January 2006 and April 2012. Two-year follow-up data were collected until 2014 for patients with endocarditis, intracardiac/intravascular device infection, osteomyelitis, or orthopedic device infection.

RESULTS

A total of 6075 patients were enrolled. The most common primary infections were complicated skin and soft tissue infection (31.7%) and bacteremia (20.7%). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently reported pathogen (42.9%; methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA], 23.2%), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis and other coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS, 28.5%). The most commonly prescribed dose of daptomycin was 6 mg/kg/day (43.6%), and the median duration of therapy was 11 (range 1-300) days. Overall clinical success rate was 80.5%, and was similar whether daptomycin was used as first-line (82.9%) or second-line (79.2%) therapy. Clinical success rates were high in patients with S. aureus (83.9%; MRSA 83.0%) and CoNS (including S. epidermidis, 82.5%) infections. The majority of patients with endocarditis or intracardiac/intravascular device infection (86.7%) or osteomyelitis/orthopedic device infection (85.9%) had a sustained response during the 2-year follow-up period. There were no new or unexpected safety findings.

CONCLUSION

Results from real-world clinical experience showed that daptomycin is a valuable therapeutic option in the management of various difficult-to-treat Gram-positive infections.

FUNDING

This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG.

Effectiveness and safety of daptomycin in complicated skin and soft-tissue infections and bacteraemia in clinical practice: results of a large non-interventional study

This retrospective analysis of patients from eight countries included in the European Cubicin(®) Outcomes Registry and Experience (EU-CORE(SM)) captures the first post-approval years of clinical experience with daptomycin in its licensed indications. Of the total 1127 patients enrolled in EU-CORE between 2006 and 2008, 373 had a primary complicated skin and soft-tissue infection (cSSTI), most commonly surgical-site infection (48%), and 244 had bacteraemia, 55% of which were catheter-related. The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus in cSSTIs (43%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci in bacteraemia (36%). The most frequently prescribed daptomycin doses were 4 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg for cSSTIs, and 6 mg/kg for bacteraemia. The median duration of inpatient and outpatient treatment, respectively, was 13 days and 8 days for cSSTIs and 8 days and 10 days for bacteraemia. Clinical success was reported for 81% of patients with cSSTIs and 77% with bacteraemia, with 82% success overall for infections caused by S. aureus. A trend towards higher clinical success was noted with higher daptomycin doses in bacteraemia (78% for 6 mg/kg vs. 90% for doses >6 mg/kg). Daptomycin demonstrated a favourable safety profile. Adverse events regardless of relationship to study drug were reported for 11% of patients with cSSTIs and 24% with bacteraemia, most commonly septic shock [7 patients (2%) with cSSTIs and 5 patients (2%) with bacteraemia]. These results demonstrate that daptomycin is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of cSSTIs and bacteraemia caused by Gram-positive bacteria in clinical practice.

Clinical experience with daptomycin in Europe: the first 2.5 years

Objectives

To describe the patient populations and infections being treated with daptomycin, as well as the efficacy and safety outcomes.

Patients and methods

Data from the European Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience (EU-CORE^SM), retrospectively collected at 118 institutions between January 2006 and August 2008, were analysed.

Results

Daptomycin treatment was documented in 1127 patients with diverse infections, including complicated skin and soft tissue infections (33%), bacteraemia (22%), endocarditis (12%) and osteomyelitis (6%). It was used empirically, before microbiological results became available, in 53% of patients. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (34%), with 52% of isolates resistant to methicillin; coagulase-negative staphylococci and enterococci were also frequent, with 22% of Enterococcus faecium isolates resistant to vancomycin. Daptomycin was used as first-line therapy in 302 (27%) patients. When used second line, the most common reasons for discontinuation of previous antibiotic were treatment failure and toxicity or intolerance. The use of concomitant antibiotics was reported in 65% of patients. Most frequent doses were 6 mg/kg (47%) and 4 mg/kg (32%). The median duration of daptomycin therapy was 10 days (range 1–246 days) in the inpatient setting and 13 days (range 2–189 days) in the outpatient setting. The overall clinical success rate was 79%, with a clinical failure rate of <10% for all infection types. Low failure rates were observed in first- and second-line therapy (6% and 8%, respectively). Daptomycin demonstrated a favourable safety and tolerability profile regardless of treatment duration.

Conclusions

Daptomycin has a relevant role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections.

Are glycopeptides still appropriate and convenient for empiric use?

The glycopeptides vancomycin and teicoplanin are widely used, and indeed recommended for, the treatment of severe or resistant Gram-positive infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring is widely used for vancomycin but less commonly for teicoplanin, and remains controversial. We report the cost savings of a formulary decision to replace teicoplanin with daptomycin for the empiric treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (CSSTIs), staphylococcal bacteraemia and hospital-acquired Gram-positive sepsis. In the Intensive Therapy Unit (ITU) we optimised treatment of serious Gram-positive infections by substituting teicoplanin with vancomycin administered by continuous infusion. Costs were calculated using British National Formulary (BNF) prices and costs for therapeutic drug monitoring. Daptomycin (350 mg/d) use was associated with a cost saving per 7 days of treatment of 86 pounds and vancomycin with 51 pounds (4 g/d) to 276 pounds (2 g/d) compared to the 600 mg teicoplanin dose. Our own formulary re-positioning of glyco/lipopeptides, i.e. the preferential use of vancomycin in the ITU and substitution of teicoplanin with daptomycin, is cost-effective and provides better therapeutic alternatives. Continuous vancomycin infusion in the ITU setting guarantees optimal dosing for severely ill patients. Daptomycin use on surgical and medical wards, apart from being marginally cheaper than teicoplanin, guarantees optimal dosing without the need for drug monitoring.

Failed prostaglandin abortion associated with placenta accreta. A case report

Prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppositories are a highly effective method of second-trimester pregnancy termination. Management of a failed prostaglandin abortion must include a search for the cause of the failure. This case report is the first description of a failed prostaglandin abortion associated with placenta accreta.

Diagnosis of amebic dysentery by detection of Entamoeba histolytica fecal antigen by an invasive strain-specific, monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

An invasive strain-specific monoclonal antibody against Entamoeba histolytica has been used in a capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of invasive E. histolytica fecal antigen in clinical specimens and for the diagnosis of amebic dysentery in patients from Bangladesh. The fecal antigen capture ELISA (FAC-ELISA) did not cross-react with other parasite species in the clinical specimens or with noninvasive E. histolytica present in those specimens and in experimentally seeded stools. The limit of detection of the assay for invasive E. histolytica crude antigen diluted in phosphate-buffered saline or in stools was 0.58 and 3.9 micrograms/ml, respectively, which is the equivalent of approximately 72 and 487 E. histolytica trophozoites per well, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of the FAC-ELISA were 87, 100, and 98%, respectively, for the detection of invasive E. histolytica antigens and 100, 100, and 100%, respectively, for the diagnosis of amebic dysentery. The FAC-ELISA is a potential alternative for the field diagnosis of amebic dysentery and for epidemiological studies to define the distribution of invasive E. histolytica.

A monoclonal antibody for distinction of invasive and noninvasive clinical isolates of Entamoeba histolytica

Approximately 10% of the world population is infected with Entamoeba histolytica, but only 10% of the carriers develop symptomatic amebiasis. This discrepancy could be explained by the genotypic differences between the morphologically indistinguishable invasive and noninvasive strains of E. histolytica currently identified by zymodeme analysis, a technique that is unsuitable for routine diagnostic laboratories. Here we report the production of a monoclonal antibody against E. histolytica and its use in an immunofluorescence assay to identify invasive isolates cultured from stool samples of infected patients in several regions where amebiasis is endemic: Bangladesh, Colombia, and Mexico. After testing a total of 88 E. histolytica isolates, the correlation between zymodeme characterization and the immunofluorescence assay with the invasive isolate-specific monoclonal antibody was 100%. The epitope detected by the invasive isolate-specific monoclonal antibody resides in a previously undescribed internal protein with molecular masses of 84 and 81 kDa in axenic and polyxenic E. histolytica strains, respectively.

Captopril in severe preeclampsia

Captopril is an inhibitor of angiotensin I converting enzyme and is used for treating intractable chronic hypertension. However, the use of captopril during pregnancy is limited because of reported fetal and neonatal side effects. This study explored the efficacy of sublingual captopril in postpartum management of severe preeclampsia. Captopril controlled the systolic and diastolic pressures within normal range in two patients. The other three patients responded moderately and were switched to hydralazine, clonidine, or nifedipine after 12 hours. The systolic and diastolic pressures of these three patients remained moderately elevated over the 24-hour duration of the study while their pulse rates increased. Captopril did not significantly increase the pulse rate in any of the patients studied, and no other side effects were noted. All patients had normal pressures at their 2- and 6-week postpartum check-up. We conclude that sublingual captopril may be used safely and effectively in managing postpartum hypertension in patients with severe preeclampsia.

Comparison of capillary and plasma glucose values in screening and oral glucose tolerance testing in pregnancy

The substitution of capillary reflectance meter glucose values for plasma or serum glucose values would be practical and cost saving. A direct comparison was performed of simultaneous capillary reflectance meter and plasma glucose values in routine screening and oral glucose tolerance testing in a pregnant population. The use of capillary glucose in 50-g glucola screening had a sensitivity of 82.6% and specificity of 98.1% as compared to the standard plasma method. Even though our data demonstrate a good correlation (r = 0.897) between capillary and plasma glucose values, our results do not support the direct substitution of plasma glucose values with capillary reflectance meter glucose values in screening for or diagnosing glucose intolerance in an obstetric population.

The influence of gestational age and preeclampsia on the presence and magnitude of serum endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substance(s)

Digoxin-like immunoreactive substance(s) has been measured in serum during pregnancy. Because of its presence in pregnancy, investigators have suggested that digoxin-like immunoreactive substance may play an etiologic role in the development of preeclampsia. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the relationship between maternal digoxin-like immunoreactive substance and gestational age and compare digoxin-like immunoreactive substance concentrations in patients with and without preeclampsia who were in the third trimester. Two hundred twenty patients were studied during either the first (n = 53), second (n = 56), or third (n = 111) trimester of pregnancy. Digoxin-like immunoreactive substance was undetectable in the serum of patients during the first trimester; however, 11% of second-trimester and 96% of third-trimester patients had measurable levels of serum digoxin-like immunoreactive substance (p less than 0.05). The mean +/- SEM concentration of digoxin-like immunoreactive substance in serum in third-trimester patients was 0.29 +/- 0.01 ng/ml (range 0 to 0.58 ng/ml). Gestational age at delivery was significantly lower in patients with preeclampsia than in those without preeclampsia (36.3 +/- 0.6 versus 38.8 +/- 0.4 weeks; p less than 0.001). In addition, there was no statistical difference in mean +/- SEM concentration of digoxin-like immunoreactive substance between 27 patients without preeclampsia (0.32 +/- 0.02 ng/ml) and 27 patients with preeclampsia (0.30 +/- 0.02 ng/ml; p = 0.47) matched for gestational age. We conclude that (1) digoxin-like immunoreactive substance appearance and increasing serum concentration during pregnancy are correlated with increasing gestational age and (2) there is no difference in digoxin-like immunoreactive substance values between patients with and without preeclampsia, which may exclude digoxin-like immunoreactive substance as a predictor of preeclampsia.

Severe preeclampsia-eclampsia in young primigravid women: subsequent pregnancy outcome and remote prognosis

The purpose of this report is to compare subsequent pregnancy outcome and incidence of chronic hypertension and diabetes on follow-up in two groups of patients. Group 1 included 406 young women who had severe preeclampsia-eclampsia in their first pregnancies. Group 2 consisted of 409 young, well-matched women who remained normotensive during their first pregnancies. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years (range 2 to 24). The preeclamptic-eclamptic group had a higher incidence of preeclampsia in their second pregnancies (46.8% versus 7.6%, p less than 0.0001) and in subsequent pregnancies (20.7% versus 7.7%, p less than 0.001) when compared with the normotensive group. The overall incidence of chronic hypertension was significantly higher in the preeclamptic-eclamptic group (14.8% versus 5.6%, p less than 0.001). Most of the difference occurred in patients followed up greater than or equal to 10 years. Within the preeclamptic-eclamptic group, patients having preeclampsia-eclampsia at less than or equal to 30 weeks' gestation and those having recurrent preeclampsia in their second pregnancies had a significantly higher incidence of subsequent chronic hypertension (p less than 0.001) than was found in the other patients. Within the normotensive group, patients remaining normotensive in subsequent pregnancies had the lowest incidence of chronic hypertension.