Feasibility and Safety of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Conjunction With Addiction Treatment for People Who Inject Drugs

BACKGROUND

Research is limited on combining outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with addiction treatment for people who inject drugs (PWID) with serious infections.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of PWID (n = 68) requiring intravenous antibiotics evaluated for suitability for our OPAT program with concurrent addiction treatment.

RESULTS

Most common infections were bacteremia and/or endocarditis (73.5%), bone and/or joint infections (32.4%), and epidural abscess (22.1%). Of the 20 patients (29.4%) who qualified, 100.0% completed the course of antibiotics, 30.0% experienced a 30-day readmission, and 15.0% relapsed. No overdoses, deaths, or peripherally inserted central catheter-line complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with addiction treatment may be feasible and safe for PWID with serious infections.

Opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections who are unsuitable for beta-lactam antibiotics: a multicenter prospective observational study

Purpose:

The objective of this prospective, observational study was to describe the treatment, severity assessment and healthcare resources required for management of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections who were unsuitable for beta-lactam antibiotic treatments.

Methods:

Patients were enrolled across five secondary care National Health Service hospitals. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection and were considered unsuitable for beta-lactam antibiotics (e.g. confirmed/suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, beta-lactam allergy). Data regarding diagnosis, severity of the infection, antibiotic treatment and patient management were collected.

Results:

145 patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection were included; 79% (n = 115) patients received greater than two antibiotic regimens; median length of the first antibiotic regimen was 2 days (interquartile range of 1–5); median time to switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics was 4 days (interquartile range of 3–8, n = 72/107); 25% (n = 10/40) patients with Eron class 1 infection had systemic inflammatory response syndrome, suggesting they were misclassified. A higher proportion of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome received treatment in an inpatient setting, and their length of stay was prolonged in comparison with patients without systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Conclusion:

There exists an urgent need for more focused antimicrobial stewardship strategies and tools for standardised clinical assessment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection severity in patients who are unsuitable for beta-lactam antibiotics. This will lead to optimised antimicrobial treatment strategies and ensure effective healthcare resource utilisation.

Efficacy of daptomycin in the treatment of enterococcal endocarditis: a 5 year comparison with conventional therapy

OBJECTIVES

Enterococcus spp. account for 10% of infective endocarditis (IE). Although daptomycin is a bactericidal drug with in vitro activity against Enterococcus, there is little experience of its use in IE. We analysed the effectiveness of daptomycin in the treatment of enterococcal IE (EIE).

METHODS

This was a retrospective descriptive study comparing the efficacy of daptomycin versus ampicillin/ceftriaxone versus conventional antibiotic regimens (ampicillin or vancomycin ± gentamicin) in EIE.

RESULTS

From January 2007 to December 2011, 6 patients with EIE treated with daptomycin monotherapy were compared with 21 patients treated with ampicillin/ceftriaxone and 5 patients treated with ampicillin or vancomycin ± gentamicin. The three groups had similar epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Daptomycin indications were allergy to β-lactams (n = 3), therapy simplification (n = 2), renal failure (n = 2) and Enterococcus faecium resistant to ampicillin/gentamicin (n = 1). Daptomycin MICs ranged from 1 to 2 mg/L and the doses were 6-10 mg/kg/day intravenously. Daptomycin patients had longer duration of bacteraemia (6 versus 1 day, P < 0.01) and greater need of therapy switch due to complications (66.7% versus 0%, P < 0.01). There were no differences regarding duration of hospital stay or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Daptomycin-treated patients more frequently required a therapeutic change due to worse microbiological and clinical response, although mortality was not increased. Our findings do not support the use of daptomycin as single therapy in the treatment of EIE. Its role in combined strategies should be further investigated.