1953. Immune responses, viral shedding, and COVID-19 symptom burden from breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in a 2:1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 study of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccination

Background

Breakthrough infections post-COVID-19 vaccination increase with waning immunity and typically produce milder disease than infections in unvaccinated individuals. We investigated immuno-virologic responses and COVID-19 symptom burden upon breakthrough infection in participants from a Phase 3 study of 2-dose primary series AZD1222 vaccination (NCT04516746) to explore disease attenuation.

Methods

Study participants who experienced protocol-defined COVID-19 symptoms initiated a series of illness visits over 28 days with collection of sera, nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs and saliva samples (SS), and documentation of symptoms (data-cut off: July 30, 2021). For baseline-seronegative participants with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection ≥15 days after dose 2 of AZD1222 or placebo we assessed: anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S), nucleocapsid (N) and neutralizing antibody (Ab) titers by multiplex immunoassay and SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus assay in sera; viral load by quantitative RT-PCR in NP swabs; and viral shedding by qualitative and quantitative RT-PCR in SS. Data were stratified by age and SARS-CoV-2 variant, and time since primary series dose 2.

Results

Illness Day 1 (ILL-D1) S Ab GMTs in AZD1222 vaccinees were similar to peak GMTs seen 14 days after dose 2 of AZD1222 and were higher vs placebo at all timepoints. The magnitude of S Ab response differed by age: median GMTs were lower at ILL-D1 and higher at ILL-D14 in vaccinees aged ≥65 vs 18–64 years (Fig.1). ILL-D1 overall, SARS-CoV-2 ancestral, alpha, and epsilon variant viral load titers in NP swabs were lower in vaccinees vs placebo (Fig 2). Mean viral load in NP swabs and viral shedding titers in SS were lower in vaccinees vs placebo at all timepoints. Vaccinees reported fewer COVID-19 symptoms than placebo participants, and experienced shorter symptom duration, particularly for fatigue and difficulty breathing.

Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody titers upon SARS-CoV-2 infection by participant age in AZD1222 vaccinees and placebo recipients during illness visits Figure 2. Quantification of viral load (nasopharyngeal swabs quantitative viral titer) by SARS-CoV-2 variant at Illness Visit Day 1

Conclusion

Improved S Ab responses, lower viral loads, and reduced symptom burden upon breakthrough infection in vaccinees vs placebo recipients, suggest that robust recall responses to AZD1222 vaccination may attenuate COVID-19 disease severity and duration. These findings alongside data on cellular immune responses to breakthrough infection will inform understanding of protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Disclosures

Magdalena E. Sobieszczyk, MD, MPH, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Janssen Global Services, LLC: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID): Grant/Research Support|National Institutes of Health (NIH): Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur Inc.: Grant/Research Support Ann R. Falsey, MD, BioFire Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Merck, Sharp and Dohme: Grant/Research Support|Novavax: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Anne F. Luetkemeyer, MD, AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support Grant C. Paulsen, MD, AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Sharon A. Riddler, MD, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID): Grant/Research Support|National Institutes of Health (NIH): Grant/Research Support|Novimmune: Advisor/Consultant Merlin L. Robb, MD, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research: Advisor/Consultant Charlotte-Paige M. Rolle, MD, MPH, Gilead Sciences: Board Member|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria|Janssen: Board Member|ViiV Healthcare: Board Member|ViiV Healthcare: Grant/Research Support|ViiV Healthcare: Honoraria|Vindico CME: Honoraria Beverly E. Sha, MD, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|MATEC: Honoraria|University of Chicago: Grant/Research Support|US Government: Grant/Research Support Bahar Ahani, BSC, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds Anastasia A. Aksyuk, PhD, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds Himanshu Bansal, MS, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds Justin A. Green, MD, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds Brett Jepson, MS, AstraZeneca: Contractor via Cytel Jill Maaske, MD, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds Kathryn Shoemaker, MS, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds Stephanie Sproule, MMath, AstraZeneca: Contractor via Joule/System One Ann Marie Stanley, PhD, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds Deidre Wilkins, BSC, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds Tonya L. Villafana, PhD, MPH, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds Elizabeth J. Kelly, PhD, AstraZeneca: Employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds.

From declining PrEP to PrEP initiation as "first nature" - what changes PrEP initiation decisions among young, Black MSM

Young Black men who have sex with men (YBMSM) bear a disproportionate burden of HIV, and HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake has been slow. Decisions regarding PrEP initiation change in different life contexts over time. Our YBMSM cohort study found about 1/3 of those who initially declined PrEP subsequently changed and initiated PrEP care. This study explores the process of their PrEP decision changes. The study interviewed participants who initially voiced strong and clear reservations about PrEP, but subsequently started PrEP 1-14 months later. In "review/renew" follow-up interviews, participants reviewed their past statements from a time they declined PrEP, and renew their understanding regarding perspective and behavioral change. Analyzing the data with a positive deviance framework, we found that shifting the decisional balance in favor of PrEP initiation only required change in some areas. There were not consistent factors that prevented or facilitated PrEP uptake. Instead, YBMSM initiated PrEP while maintaining an array of substantial reservations. PrEP initiation discussions should be viewed by health practitioners as a longitudinal process, and routine PrEP offers should be made over time. To optimally facilitate PrEP use among YBMSM, the diverse benefits of PrEP should be emphasized rather than focusing on allaying all concerns.

889. Early Discontinuations and Adverse Events Among Treatment-Naïve Patients Initiating Integrase Inhibitors in a Real-world Setting

Background

Cohort studies suggest higher rates of discontinuations (DCs) and adverse events (AEs) with integrase inhibitors (INSTIs) than is reported in clinical trials. Here, we assess DC of different INSTIs in combination with one of two tenofovir prodrugs in the first year following initiation defined as “early DC” in a real-world cohort of treatment-naïve patients.

Methods

This analysis evaluated treatment-naïve patients at a single center initiating raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir/cobicistat (EVG/c), dolutegravir (DTG) or bictegravir (BIC) in combination with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) or emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) between 10/2007-1/2020. Eligible patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The primary endpoint was incidence of early INSTI DC. Secondary endpoints included AEs and risk factors for early INSTI DC and treatment-related AEs.

Results

331 patients were included. Median age was 32 years, 89% were male, 43% were non-White, 8% started RAL-based therapy, 46% started EVG/c-based therapy, 22% started DTG-based therapy and 24% started BIC/F/TAF. 36 discontinued INSTI-based therapy early yielding an incidence rate of 0.17 DCs per person-years (PPY) among RAL patients, 0.14 DCs PPY among EVG/c patients, 0.22 DCs PPY among DTG patients, and 0 DCs PPY among BIC patients, p=0.006. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 27% of RAL patients, 42% of EVG/c patients, 50% of DTG patients, and 43% of BIC patients p=0.607; and were responsible for early DC rates of 0.022 in 3 EVG/c patients and 0.075 in 5 DTG patients. No treatment-related early DCs occurred among RAL or BIC patients. No evaluated factor was significantly associated with early INSTI DC, however DTG use was significantly associated with treatment-related AEs (aOR 3.46, 95% confidence interval: [1.20; 10.82]).

Table 1. Risk factors for early integrase inhibitor discontinuation and treatment-related adverse events

Conclusion

In this cohort, early DCs occurred in 11% initiating INSTI-based therapy, however of these only 2% were treatment-related. These data support use of INSTI-based regimens as preferred options for treatment-naïve patients living with HIV due to their favorable safety and tolerability profiles.

Disclosures

Charlotte-Paige M. Rolle, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen Infectious Disease (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Kiran Patel, PharmD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Federico Hinestrosa, MD, AbbVie (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead Sciences (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Theratechonologies (Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Edwin DeJesus, MD, Gilead Sciences (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)

75. High Rates of Virologic Suppression with DTG/3TC in Newly Diagnosed Adults with HIV-1 Infection and Baseline Viral Load >500,000 c/mL: 48-Week Subgroup Analysis of the STAT Study

Background

The primary analysis of the STAT study demonstrated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of using DTG/3TC as a first-line regimen in a test-and-treat setting through 24 weeks, with therapy adjustments for baseline resistance or hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection. Here we present secondary analyses through Week 48 of virologic outcomes in participants by baseline viral load (VL).

Methods

STAT is a single-arm study of treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection who initiated DTG/3TC ≤ 14 days after HIV-1 diagnosis without availability of screening/baseline laboratory results. If baseline testing indicated DTG or 3TC resistance, HBV co-infection, or creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, then antiretroviral therapy (ART) was potentially adjusted and participants remained on study. Efficacy analyses included proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL regardless of ART regimen at Week 48, among all participants (ITT-E missing = failure analysis) and among participants with available HIV-1 RNA data at Week 48 (observed analysis).

Results

Of 131 enrolled, DTG/3TC treatment was adjusted in 10 participants, and of those with available data (n=7), all (100%) achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Week 48. At Week 48, 82% (107/131) of all participants (Figure 1) and 97% (107/110) of those with available data (Figure 2) achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL. Of participants with baseline VL ≥ 500,000 c/mL, 89% (17/19) achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Week 48; the remaining 2 withdrew from study. Of participants with baseline VL ≥ 1,000,000 c/mL, 90% (9/10) achieved HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Week 48 (Table); the remaining participant withdrew consent. Of the 17 participants with baseline VL ≥ 500,000 c/mL with available data through Week 48, 76% (13/17) achieved virologic suppression by Week 24. One participant with baseline VL ≥ 500,000 c/mL switched from DTG/3TC before the Week 48 assessment. Of the 9 participants with baseline VL

≥ 1,000,000 c/mL with available data through Week 48, most participants (8/9; 89%) were suppressed by Week 24.

Figure 1. Virologic outcomes at Week 48, overall and by baseline VL and CD4+ cell count: ITT-E missing = failure analysis.

Conclusion

These data provide evidence for the efficacy and feasibility of using DTG/3TC as a first-line regimen in a test-and-treat setting, including among participants with very high baseline VL.

Disclosures

Charlotte-Paige M. Rolle, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen Infectious Disease (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau) Tulika Singh, MD MS AAHIVS, Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker's Bureau) Moti Ramgopal, MD FIDSA, Abbvie (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Gilead (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Janssen (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support, Speaker's Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)ViiV (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau) Dushyantha Jayaweera, MD, mrcog(uk), face, Gilead (Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Research Grant or Support)viiv (Research Grant or Support) Peter Leone, MD, viiv healthcare (Employee) Jessica Matthews, BS, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Michael Cupo, Ph.D., GlaxoSmithKline (Employee) Mark Underwood, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Kostas Angelis, PhD, GSK (Employee, Shareholder) Brian Wynne, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee, Shareholder, I have shares in GSK, the part owner of ViiV) Deanna Merrill, PharmD, MBA, AAHIVP, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Christopher T. Nguyen, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Jean A. van Wyk, MB,ChB, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Andrew Zolopa, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee)

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Uptake and Discontinuation Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in Atlanta, Georgia: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has great potential to reduce HIV incidence among young black men who have sex with men (YBMSM); however, initiation and persistence for this group remain low. We sought to understand the patterns and predictors of PrEP uptake and discontinuation among YBMSM in Atlanta, Georgia.

METHODS

PrEP was offered to all participants in a prospective cohort of YBMSM aged 18-29 years not living with HIV. Time to PrEP uptake, first discontinuation, and final discontinuation were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of uptake and discontinuation.

RESULTS

After 440 person-years of follow-up, 44% of YBMSM initiated PrEP through the study after a median of 122 days. Of PrEP initiators, 69% had a first discontinuation and 40% had a final discontinuation during the study period. The median time to first PrEP discontinuation was 159 days. Factors associated with PrEP uptake included higher self-efficacy, sexually transmitted infection (STI), and condomless anal intercourse. Factors associated with discontinuation included younger age, cannabis use, STI, and fewer sex partners. HIV incidence was 5.23/100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.40-7.23), with a lower rate among those who started PrEP (incidence rate ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, .16-.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent PrEP coverage in this cohort of YBMSM was suboptimal, and discontinuations were common despite additional support services available through the study. Interventions to support PrEP uptake and persistence, especially for younger and substance-using YBMSM, are necessary to achieve full PrEP effectiveness.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02503618.

1012. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of switching to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in HIV-1 infected virologically-suppressed older adults in a real-world setting

Background

Approximately 50% of people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States are ≥50 years old. Efforts are ongoing to identify antiretrovirals associated with fewer drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and long-term side effects in this group. Clinical trials of B/F/TAF demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in older adults, however, data from real-word settings are needed to validate these results.

Methods

This retrospective analysis evaluated records from PLWH aged ≥ 50 years at the Orlando Immunology Center who were switched to B/F/TAF between 2/7/2018 and 5/31/2019. Eligible patients had baseline HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL and were followed for 48 weeks post-switch. The primary endpoint was maintenance of HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL at week 48. The impact of switching to B/F/TAF on DDIs, adverse events (AEs) and safety parameters were analyzed throughout the study.

Results

306 patients met inclusion criteria. 62 (20%) were female, 126 (41%) were non-white, median age was 58 years (range [r] 50-81), median duration of HIV infection was 19.5 years (r 2-40), median number of chronic co-morbid conditions was 5 (r 0-20), and median number of baseline concomitant medications was 4 (r 0-23). 159 (52%) patients were switched from regimens containing ritonavir or cobicistat. The most commonly documented reason for switch was simplification (Table 1). At Week 48, 287 (94%) patients maintained an HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/ml and 19 (6%) had an HIV-1 RNA between 50-200 copies/mL (Figure 1). 1 patient discontinued due to lack of efficacy. A total of 123 potential DDIs were identified in 104 (34%) patients taking a boosting agent or rilpivirine at baseline (Table 2). At Week 48, there was a significant median decline in total cholesterol (15.5 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.5; 21.5), LDL cholesterol (9.5 mg/dL, 95% CI: 4; 15.5) and triglycerides (20 mg/dL, 95% CI: 9.5; 32.5), and median weight increased by 2.5 pounds (95% CI: 1.5; 3.5). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 33 (11%) patients (all Grade 1-2) and led to 7 (2%) discontinuations.

Table 1-Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics

Table 2-Avoidance of Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) following switch to B/F/TAF

Figure 1-Subgroup analysis of virologic outcomes at Week 48

Conclusion

In this real-world cohort, switching to B/F/TAF was associated with maintenance of virologic control, improvement in lipid parameters, and avoidance of DDIs in a large proportion of patients. These data support use of B/F/TAF as a treatment option in older PLWH.

Disclosures

Charlotte-Paige M. Rolle, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)Janssen Infectious Disease (Grant/Research Support)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Kiran Patel, PharmD, Gilead Sciences (Employee) Federico Hinestrosa, MD, AbbVie (Speaker’s Bureau)Gilead Sciences (Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Speaker’s Bureau)Theratechnologies (Speaker’s Bureau) Edwin DeJesus, MD, Gilead Sciences (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Beyond the Biomedical: Preexposure Prophylaxis Failures in a Cohort of Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in Atlanta, Georgia

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has high biomedical efficacy; however, awareness, access, uptake, and persistence on therapy remain low among black men who have sex with men (BMSM), who are at highest risk of HIV in the United States. To date, discussions of "PrEP failure" have focused on one typology: rare, documented HIV acquisitions among PrEP users with adequate serum drug levels (ie, biomedical failure). In our cohort of HIV-negative young BMSM in Atlanta, Georgia, we continue to observe a high HIV incidence (6.2% annually at interim analysis) despite access to free PrEP services. Among 14 seroconversions, all were offered PrEP before acquiring HIV. Among these participants, we identified 4 additional typologies of PrEP failure that expand beyond biomedical failure: low PrEP adherence, PrEP discontinuation, PrEP contemplation without initiation, and PrEP refusal. We describe the 5 typologies and suggest interventions to improve PrEP effectiveness among those at highest risk.

2482. Clinical Outcomes of Once-Daily Darunavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients with Darunavir Resistance Associated Mutations Through 48 Weeks of Treatment

Background

Darunavir (DRV) is a well-tolerated, potent protease inhibitor used once-daily in patients with no DRV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) and twice-daily in those with DRV RAMs. Treatment guidelines encourage use of once-daily regimens to optimize patient adherence, convenience and tolerability. Several studies suggest that once-daily DRV retains efficacy in the setting of 1–2 DRV RAMs whereas 3 or more DRV RAMs (with multiple background PI RAMs) is needed for DRV resistance. Currently, there is little clinical data to support the long-term use of once-daily DRV in patients with DRV RAMs.

Methods

This is a retrospective study evaluating the 48-week clinical outcomes of 22 treatment-experienced patients with DRV RAMs switched to once-daily DRV between 2014 and 2017 at the Orlando Immunology Center. The primary endpoint was the proportion with virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL) at Week 48. Adherence, adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters were analyzed throughout the study.

Results

The median age (range) of the sample was 53 (21–77) years, median baseline CD4+ count was 609 cells/mm3, 18 (82%) had baseline HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL, 15 (69%) had previously used 1 or more PIs and median number (range) of baseline DRV RAMs was 2 (1–5) (Table 1). At Week 48, 20 (91%) had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL; 2 (9%) virologic non-responders had HIV-1 RNA of 82 and 59,637 copies/mL and reported noncompliance (Figure 1). There was no significant change in median CD4+ count from baseline to Week 48 (+22, 95% confidence interval (CI): [−116.5; 56.0]). Once-daily DRV was associated with a significant median increase in HDL cholesterol (+82, 95% CI: [37.0; 101.0]) and a significant median decrease in LDL cholesterol (-60, 95% CI: [-89.5; -31.0]). There were no significant changes in the proportion of patients on lipid lowering therapy at baseline and week 48 (p = 0.33). There were no self-reported AEs or Grade 3–4 lab abnormalities through Week 48.

Conclusion

Once-daily DRV maintained virologic control in this cohort of treatment-experienced patients with 1 or more baseline DRV RAMs and was safe and well-tolerated. This suggests that once-daily DRV may be effective in this population however further data are needed to validate this as a viable treatment option.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

2486. Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated with Dolutegravir Functional Monotherapy or Dolutegravir plus an Active Non-cytosine Nucleoside Analog: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study of Treatment-Experienced Patients

Background

Dual dolutegravir (DTG)-containing regimens (DCRs) are currently approved for the treatment of antiretroviral (ARV) naïve and experienced patients with HIV-1 infection. DTG monotherapy has resulted in unacceptable rates of virologic failure and subsequent development of DTG resistance. Here, we evaluate the “real-world” efficacy and “barrier to resistance” of DCRs containing 0–1 active ARVs.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study evaluating clinical outcomes of treatment-experienced patients on combination DCRs found to be on DTG functional monotherapy or DTG plus an active non-cytosine analog between 2013 and 2014. The primary endpoint was virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL) at week 48. Virologic failure (VF) was defined as confirmed HIV-1 RNA≥ 50 copies/mL 12 weeks after initiating DTG or any time after achieving HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL. Adherence, adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters were analyzed throughout the study.

Results

Thirty-nine patients were included in the analysis, 19 (49%) were on DTG functional monotherapy and 20 (51%) were on DTG plus a non-cytosine nucleoside analog. The median age (range) was 53 (40–74) years, median baseline CD4+ count (range) was 564 (92–1217) cells/mm³, 22 (56%) had baseline HIV-1 RNA< 50 copies/mL, and 24 (62%) had previously used INSTIs (Table 1). At Weeks 48 and 96, virologic suppression was observed in 78.3% and 86% of patients respectively (Figures 1 and 2). Among 7 VFs (2 on DTG functional monotherapy, 5 on DTG plus a non-cytosine nucleoside analog), there was no evidence of treatment-emergent resistance to DTG. There was a significant median increase in CD4+ count from baseline to Week 48 (+90 cells/mm³, 95% confidence interval: [14.18, 165.9]). No significant changes in lipid parameters were observed. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 17/39 (44%) patients (all Grade 1–2) and 1 patient discontinued DCR treatment due to rash.

Conclusion

In this “real-world” cohort of treatment-experienced patients, we observed that DTG functional monotherapy and DTG plus a non-cytosine nucleoside analog maintained long-term virologic control and was well tolerated. These data supports use of DTG as a partner for dual DCRs given its high efficacy in patients with underlying ARV resistance.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Contrasting Self-Perceived Need and Guideline-Based Indication for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among Young, Black Men Who Have Sex with Men Offered Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Atlanta, Georgia

Despite high HIV incidence among young black men who have sex with men (YBMSM), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake in this group is low. In a cohort of HIV-negative YBMSM in Atlanta, GA, all participants were offered PrEP as standard of care with free clinician visits and laboratory testing. We explored self-perceived need for PrEP among 29 in-depth interview participants by asking about reasons for PrEP uptake or refusal and factors that may lead to future reconsideration. Self-perceived need was compared to US Center for Disease Control and Prevention guidance for clinical PrEP indication using behavioral data and laboratory testing data. Self-perceived need for PrEP consistently underestimated clinical indication, primarily due to optimism for choosing other HIV prevention strategies, such as condom use, abstinence, or monogamy. Many participants cited consistent condom use and lack of sexual activity as reasons for not starting PrEP; however, follow-up survey data frequently demonstrated low condom use and high levels of sexual activity in the period after the interview. Study participants endorsed perceptions that PrEP is only for people with very high levels of sexual activity. Only one participant perceived incident sexually transmitted infection (STI) to be an indication for PrEP, despite the fact that several of the participants had a history of an STI diagnosis. These findings point to an opportunity for clinician intervention at diagnosis. Disconnect between self-perceived and guidance-based PrEP indications, as well as other factors such as medical mistrust or difficulty with access, may contribute to low PrEP uptake among YBMSM. A better understanding of the ways in which these issues manifest may be one tool for clinicians to support PrEP uptake.