1
|
Catarino CB, von Livonius B, Priglinger C, Banik R, Matloob S, Tamhankar MA, Castillo L, Friedburg C, Halfpenny CA, Lincoln JA, Traber GL, Acaroglu G, Black GCM, Doncel C, Fraser CL, Jakubaszko J, Landau K, Langenegger SJ, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Newman NJ, Poulton J, Scoppettuolo E, Subramanian P, Toosy AT, Vidal M, Vincent AL, Votruba M, Zarowski M, Zermansky A, Lob F, Rudolph G, Mikazans O, Silva M, Llòria X, Metz G, Klopstock T. Real-World Clinical Experience With Idebenone in the Treatment of Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy. J Neuroophthalmol 2020; 40:558-565. [PMID: 32991388 PMCID: PMC7657145 DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000001023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) leads to bilateral central vision loss. In a clinical trial setting, idebenone has been shown to be safe and to provide a trend toward improved visual acuity, but long-term evidence of effectiveness in real-world clinical practice is sparse. METHODS Open-label, multicenter, retrospective, noncontrolled analysis of long-term visual acuity and safety in 111 LHON patients treated with idebenone (900 mg/day) in an expanded access program. Eligible patients had a confirmed mitochondrial DNA mutation and had experienced the onset of symptoms (most recent eye) within 1 year before enrollment. Data on visual acuity and adverse events were collected as per normal clinical practice. Efficacy was assessed as the proportion of patients with either a clinically relevant recovery (CRR) or a clinically relevant stabilization (CRS) of visual acuity. In the case of CRR, time to and magnitude of recovery over the course of time were also assessed. RESULTS At time of analysis, 87 patients had provided longitudinal efficacy data. Average treatment duration was 25.6 months. CRR was observed in 46.0% of patients. Analysis of treatment effect by duration showed that the proportion of patients with recovery and the magnitude of recovery increased with treatment duration. Average gain in best-corrected visual acuity for responders was 0.72 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), equivalent to more than 7 lines on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Furthermore, 50% of patients who had a visual acuity below 1.0 logMAR in at least one eye at initiation of treatment successfully maintained their vision below this threshold by last observation. Idebenone was well tolerated, with most adverse events classified as minor. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate the benefit of idebenone treatment in recovering lost vision and maintaining good residual vision in a real-world setting. Together, these findings indicate that idebenone treatment should be initiated early and be maintained more than 24 months to maximize efficacy. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of idebenone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia B Catarino
- Department of Neurology (CBC, OM, TK), Friedrich-Baur-Institute, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) (CBC, TK), Munich, Germany; Department of Ophthalmology (BL, CP, FL, GR), University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany; New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai (RB), New York, New York; Ophthalmology Department (SM), Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand; Scheie Eye Institute (MAT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Institut Català de Retina (LC), Barcelona, Spain; Augenklinik (CF), Universitätsklinikum Giessen, Giessen, Germany; University Hospital Southampton (CAH), Southampton, United Kingdom; McGovern Medical School (JAL), UTHealth, Houston, Texas; Department of Ophthalmology (GLT, KL, SJL), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Neuro-ophthalmology Associates (GA), Ankara, Turkey; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine (GCMB), Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences (GCMB), Neuroscience and Mental Health Domain, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; Ophthalmology Unit (CD), Hospital de Poniente, El Ejido, Almería, Spain; Save Sight Institute (CLF), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Pediatric Traumatology and Emergency Medicine (JJ), Wroclaw Medical University, Poland; Poland SPEKTRUM Ophthalmology Clinic (JJ), Wroclaw, Poland; University Hospital Ramon y Cajal (FJM-N), IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain; Emory University School of Medicine (NJN), Atlanta Georgia; Nuffield Dept Obstetrics and Gynaecology (JP), University of Oxford, The Women's Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Ophthalmology (ES), East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Neuro-Ophthalmology Division (PS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Neuroinflammation (ATT), Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona (MV), Barcelona, Spain; Eye Department (ALV), Greenlane Clinical Centre, Auckland, New Zealand; School of Optometry and Vision Sciences (MV), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Department of Developmental Neurology (MZ), Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland; Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience (AZ), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom; Neuro-ophthalmology Unit (MS, XL, GM) Santhera Pharmaceuticals, Pratteln, Switzerland; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (TK), Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
The incidence, diagnostic landscape, and workload impact of CNS inflammatory diseases other than multiple sclerosis (MS) (CIDOMS) in a tertiary setting is unknown. We describe a retrospective case series of 64 patients identified over a 2-year period (2009–2010) at the Wessex Neurological Centre in the United Kingdom, accounting for 4% of all patients seen at the center. As expected, neurosarcoidosis and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) were the most common diagnoses reached (14% each); other diagnoses singly accounted for <10%. However, the likeliest diagnostic outcome (strikingly, in 25%) was nondiagnosis, despite intensive investigation and a mean follow-up period of 3 years. Undiagnosed patients with CIDOMS represented the largest workload of the neurology center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan Street
- From Clinical Neurosciences (D.S., I.G.), Clinical & Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton; and Wessex Neurological Centre (C.A.H., I.G.), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pitceathly RDS, Smith C, Fratter C, Alston CL, He L, Craig K, Blakely EL, Evans JC, Taylor J, Shabbir Z, Deschauer M, Pohl U, Roberts ME, Jackson MC, Halfpenny CA, Turnpenny PD, Lunt PW, Hanna MG, Schaefer AM, McFarland R, Horvath R, Chinnery PF, Turnbull DM, Poulton J, Taylor RW, Gorman GS. Adults with RRM2B-related mitochondrial disease have distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 135:3392-403. [PMID: 23107649 PMCID: PMC3501970 DOI: 10.1093/brain/aws231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Mutations in the nuclear-encoded mitochondrial maintenance gene RRM2B are an important cause of familial mitochondrial disease in both adults and children and represent the third most common cause of multiple mitochondrial DNA deletions in adults, following POLG [polymerase (DNA directed), gamma] and PEO1 (now called C10ORF2, encoding the Twinkle helicase) mutations. However, the clinico-pathological and molecular features of adults with RRM2B-related disease have not been clearly defined. In this multicentre study of 26 adult patients from 22 independent families, including five additional cases published in the literature, we show that extra-ocular neurological complications are common in adults with genetically confirmed RRM2B mutations. We also demonstrate a clear correlation between the clinical phenotype and the underlying genetic defect. Myopathy was a prominent manifestation, followed by bulbar dysfunction and fatigue. Sensorineural hearing loss and gastrointestinal disturbance were also important findings. Severe multisystem neurological disease was associated with recessively inherited compound heterozygous mutations with a mean age of disease onset at 7 years. Dominantly inherited heterozygous mutations were associated with a milder predominantly myopathic phenotype with a later mean age of disease onset at 46 years. Skeletal muscle biopsies revealed subsarcolemmal accumulation of mitochondria and/or cytochrome c oxidase-deficient fibres. Multiple mitochondrial DNA deletions were universally present in patients who underwent a muscle biopsy. We identified 18 different heterozygous RRM2B mutations within our cohort of patients, including five novel mutations that have not previously been reported. Despite marked clinical overlap between the mitochondrial maintenance genes, key clinical features such as bulbar dysfunction, hearing loss and gastrointestinal disturbance should help prioritize genetic testing towards RRM2B analysis, and sequencing of the gene may preclude performance of a muscle biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D S Pitceathly
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the presence of neural progenitor cells (NPC) in the retina of other species capable of differentiating into multiple neural components, the authors report the presence of NPC in the adult human retina. A resident population of NPC suggests that the retina may constitutively replace neurons, photoreceptors, and glia. METHODS Adult human postmortem retinal explants and cell suspensions were used to generate cells in tissue culture that display the features of NPC. The phenotype of cells and differentiation into neurons was determined by immunocytochemistry. Dividing cells were labelled with 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and neurospheres were generated and passaged. RESULTS Cells labelled with nestin, neurofilament M (NFM), rhodopsin, or glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) grew out from explant cultures. BrdU labelling of these cells occurred only with basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2). Dissociated retina and pars plana generated primary neurospheres. From primary neurospheres, NPC were passaged to generate secondary neurospheres, neurons, photoreceptors, and glia. BrdU labelling identified dividing cells from neurospheres that differentiated to express NFM and rhodopsin. CONCLUSION The adult human retina contains NPC and may have the potential to replace neurons and photoreceptors. This has implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of retinal disorders and degenerations, including glaucoma, and those disorders associated with retinal scarring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Mayer
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LX, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Stem cells are widely believed to have significant potential in the treatment of human disease. Comments such as '[stem cells]...could prove the Holy Grail in finding treatments for cancer, Parkinson's disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, spinal cord injuries, Alzheimer's disease, leukaemia and multiple sclerosis...transform[ing] the lives of hundreds of thousands of people' (Yvette Cooper, Public Health minister, quoted in The Times, December 16 2000, authors' italics) serve to reinforce the extraordinary expectations of stem cells, particularly in neurological disease. Stem cells, traditionally defined as clone forming, self-renewing, pluripotent, progenitor cells, have already proved themselves to be an invaluable source of transplantation material in several clinical settings, most notably malignant haematology, and attention is now turning to a wider variety of diseases in which there may be potential for therapeutic intervention with stem cell transplantation. Neurological diseases have been highlighted as a priority and this is understandable given their unenviable reputation for relentless progression and the paucity of disease-modifying treatments. However, it is important that the potential of stem cells to treat neurological disease is critically appraised if the hopes of patients and doctors are not to be raised without foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Rice
- University of Bristol Institute of Clinical Neurosciences Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|