1
|
Catarino CB, von Livonius B, Priglinger C, Banik R, Matloob S, Tamhankar MA, Castillo L, Friedburg C, Halfpenny CA, Lincoln JA, Traber GL, Acaroglu G, Black GCM, Doncel C, Fraser CL, Jakubaszko J, Landau K, Langenegger SJ, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Newman NJ, Poulton J, Scoppettuolo E, Subramanian P, Toosy AT, Vidal M, Vincent AL, Votruba M, Zarowski M, Zermansky A, Lob F, Rudolph G, Mikazans O, Silva M, Llòria X, Metz G, Klopstock T. Real-World Clinical Experience With Idebenone in the Treatment of Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy. J Neuroophthalmol 2020; 40:558-565. [PMID: 32991388 PMCID: PMC7657145 DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000001023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) leads to bilateral central vision loss. In a clinical trial setting, idebenone has been shown to be safe and to provide a trend toward improved visual acuity, but long-term evidence of effectiveness in real-world clinical practice is sparse. METHODS Open-label, multicenter, retrospective, noncontrolled analysis of long-term visual acuity and safety in 111 LHON patients treated with idebenone (900 mg/day) in an expanded access program. Eligible patients had a confirmed mitochondrial DNA mutation and had experienced the onset of symptoms (most recent eye) within 1 year before enrollment. Data on visual acuity and adverse events were collected as per normal clinical practice. Efficacy was assessed as the proportion of patients with either a clinically relevant recovery (CRR) or a clinically relevant stabilization (CRS) of visual acuity. In the case of CRR, time to and magnitude of recovery over the course of time were also assessed. RESULTS At time of analysis, 87 patients had provided longitudinal efficacy data. Average treatment duration was 25.6 months. CRR was observed in 46.0% of patients. Analysis of treatment effect by duration showed that the proportion of patients with recovery and the magnitude of recovery increased with treatment duration. Average gain in best-corrected visual acuity for responders was 0.72 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), equivalent to more than 7 lines on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Furthermore, 50% of patients who had a visual acuity below 1.0 logMAR in at least one eye at initiation of treatment successfully maintained their vision below this threshold by last observation. Idebenone was well tolerated, with most adverse events classified as minor. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate the benefit of idebenone treatment in recovering lost vision and maintaining good residual vision in a real-world setting. Together, these findings indicate that idebenone treatment should be initiated early and be maintained more than 24 months to maximize efficacy. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of idebenone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia B Catarino
- Department of Neurology (CBC, OM, TK), Friedrich-Baur-Institute, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) (CBC, TK), Munich, Germany; Department of Ophthalmology (BL, CP, FL, GR), University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany; New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai (RB), New York, New York; Ophthalmology Department (SM), Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand; Scheie Eye Institute (MAT), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Institut Català de Retina (LC), Barcelona, Spain; Augenklinik (CF), Universitätsklinikum Giessen, Giessen, Germany; University Hospital Southampton (CAH), Southampton, United Kingdom; McGovern Medical School (JAL), UTHealth, Houston, Texas; Department of Ophthalmology (GLT, KL, SJL), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Neuro-ophthalmology Associates (GA), Ankara, Turkey; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine (GCMB), Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences (GCMB), Neuroscience and Mental Health Domain, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicines and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; Ophthalmology Unit (CD), Hospital de Poniente, El Ejido, Almería, Spain; Save Sight Institute (CLF), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Pediatric Traumatology and Emergency Medicine (JJ), Wroclaw Medical University, Poland; Poland SPEKTRUM Ophthalmology Clinic (JJ), Wroclaw, Poland; University Hospital Ramon y Cajal (FJM-N), IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain; Emory University School of Medicine (NJN), Atlanta Georgia; Nuffield Dept Obstetrics and Gynaecology (JP), University of Oxford, The Women's Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Ophthalmology (ES), East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Neuro-Ophthalmology Division (PS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Neuroinflammation (ATT), Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona (MV), Barcelona, Spain; Eye Department (ALV), Greenlane Clinical Centre, Auckland, New Zealand; School of Optometry and Vision Sciences (MV), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Department of Developmental Neurology (MZ), Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland; Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience (AZ), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom; Neuro-ophthalmology Unit (MS, XL, GM) Santhera Pharmaceuticals, Pratteln, Switzerland; and Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (TK), Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hartmann-Andersen F, Andersen PK, Olsen JE, Jakubaszko J. Distribution of expiratory gas and rebreathing in a T-piece modification combined with a PEEP valve. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1984; 28:671-6. [PMID: 6441434 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1984.tb02143.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
T-piece modifications with PEEP valves are often used in weaning from mechanical ventilation or for intubated patients not requiring ventilatory support. Distribution of expiratory gas and the extent of rebreathing in a T-piece modified with an inspiratory reservoir (ICR) and with a PEEP valve were studied in a model with various fresh gas flows (FGF), tidal volumes and frequencies at three valve settings: 0 cmH2O (ZEEP) and PEEP of 5 and 10 cmH2O (0.490-0.981 kPa). Two types of distribution of expiratory gas were delineated: type one with expiratory gas in the inspiratory limb (IL) and a high ratio of the maximum CO2 content and corresponding end-expiratory CO2 concentration in the expiratory limb (EL) (FmaxCO2/FECO2) and a type 2 with no detectable alveolar gas in the IL and a low ratio of FmaxCO2/FECO2. The use of PEEP did not increase the amount of alveolar gas in the system, and no increase occurred in the end-expiratory CO2 concentration. The investigated system is in fact a Mapleson A system. The ratio of FGF to minute ventilation just preventing rebreathing during spontaneous ventilation is approximately 1, in contrast to 3 in other modifications. These advantages minimize the risk of rebreathing, even when the minute ventilation rises to that of the fresh gas flow. The T-system with a compliant inspiratory reservoir and a PEEP valve can, in most clinical weaning situations, satisfy the inspiratory peak flow of different respiratory patterns with a standard FGF of 15 l X min-1.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hartmann-Andersen F, Andersen PK, Olsen JE, Jakubaszko J. Distribution of expiratory gas and rebreathing in T-piece modifications used in weaning. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1983; 27:501-4. [PMID: 6421079 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1983.tb01995.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
The simple T-piece is frequently used as a weaning system during respirator treatment. It is modified with an expiratory non-compliant reservoir (EnCR), an inspiratory compliant reservoir (ICR) and/or an expiratory one-way valve. The distribution of expiratory gases and rebreathing were studied in a model set-up in the corresponding systems at different fresh gas flows (FGF) and tidal volumes (VT). An EnCR produces no change, whereas an ICR causes the expiratory gas to flow into the inspiratory limb, an effect which is intensified by the presence of an expiratory valve. With a falling FGF and a rising VT, increasing amounts of expiratory gas are found in the inspiratory limb in the modifications with an ICR. However, this gives rise to rebreathing in the valve modification with a low FGF and high VT. The modification of the T-piece with an ICR but without a one-way valve is advantageous, as this system combines only slight dilution via the expiratory limb and a minimal risk of rebreathing.
Collapse
|
9
|
Aronski A, Kübler A, Majda A, Jakubaszko J. Comparative study of the action of naloxone (Narcan) and nalorphine in man. Anaesth Resusc Intensive Ther 1975; 3:221-30. [PMID: 1217693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The comparative study of 2 narcotic antagonists, naloxone and nalorphine, was performed in healthy volunteers. The influence of these drugs on the respiratory and cicularoty systems and on the psychical state was compared. The study was carried out in a double-blind, cross-over manner. Increasing doses of naloxone and placebo or nalorphine and placebo, were administered intravenously. Naloxone, even in very high doses, caused no changes in cardivascular system, acid-base balance, sensitivity of respiratory centre to carbon dioxide and psychical state of volunteers. After the administration of nalorphine, even in very small doses, changes in psychical state in all examined subjects were observed. Nalorphine caused the significant change in the ventilatory response to CO2. Based on their results, the authors conclude that naloxone has no agonist or intrinsic narcotic activity, as opposed to nalorphine possessing strong narcotic action.
Collapse
|