1
|
Kaier TE, Hurrell H, Patterson T, Li Kam Wa M, Fisk G, Stewart J, Baig K, Ghosh-Dastidar M, Young CP, Redwood SR, De Silva K, Clapp B, Perera D, Pavlidis AN. The Impact of a Dedicated Chronic Total Occlusion PCI Program on Heart Team Decision Making. J Invasive Cardiol 2022; 34:E660-E664. [PMID: 35916923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines endorse a heart team (HT) approach to standardize the decision-making process for patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). With percutaneous treatment options for complex CAD increasing, we hypothesized that practice had changed over the past decade-and that more individuals, previously deemed too high risk for intervention, would now be referred for either surgical or percutaneous revascularization. METHODS This observational study was conducted at St Thomas' Hospital (London, United Kingdom). All patients discussed at HT meetings were recorded and treatment recommendations audited. A subset of historic cases was selected for blinded, repeat discussion. RESULTS From April 2018 to 2019, a total of 52 HT meetings discussing 375 cases were held. Patients tended to be male, with a majority demonstrating multivessel CAD in the context of preserved left ventricular function. SYNTAX scores were balanced across the tertiles. Thirty-five percent of patients had at least 1 chronic total occlusion (mean J-CTO, 3 [interquartile range, 2-3]), affecting the right coronary artery in 60%. Fifteen historic patients with isolated CTOs were re-presented an average of 8 years later; only 3 patients received the same outcome, with 80% now receiving a recommendation for revascularization over medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS A dedicated program supporting complex coronary intervention is associated with a change in treatment recommendations issued by the local HT. In line with international guidelines, this might indicate that any complex or multivessel CAD should be discussed at HT meetings with, ideally, the presence of CTO operators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Antonis N Pavlidis
- St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laufer G, Strauch JT, Terp KA, Salinas M, Arribas JM, Massetti M, Andreas M, Young CP. Real-world 6-month outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve system. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2022; 35:6565358. [PMID: 35394527 PMCID: PMC9631962 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivac083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Günther Laufer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna/Cardiac Surgery , Vienna, Austria
| | - Justus T Strauch
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum , Bochum, Germany
| | - Kim A Terp
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby , Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Marco Salinas
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale Del Cuore G.Pasquinucci , Massa, Italy
| | - Jose M Arribas
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca , El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Massimo Massetti
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart—Rome , Rome, Italy
| | - Martin Andreas
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Toff WD, Hildick-Smith D, Kovac J, Mullen MJ, Wendler O, Mansouri A, Rombach I, Abrams KR, Conroy SP, Flather MD, Gray AM, MacCarthy P, Monaghan MJ, Prendergast B, Ray S, Young CP, Crossman DC, Cleland JGF, de Belder MA, Ludman PF, Jones S, Densem CG, Tsui S, Kuduvalli M, Mills JD, Banning AP, Sayeed R, Hasan R, Fraser DGW, Trivedi U, Davies SW, Duncan A, Curzen N, Ohri SK, Malkin CJ, Kaul P, Muir DF, Owens WA, Uren NG, Pessotto R, Kennon S, Awad WI, Khogali SS, Matuszewski M, Edwards RJ, Ramesh BC, Dalby M, Raja SG, Mariscalco G, Lloyd C, Cox ID, Redwood SR, Gunning MG, Ridley PD. Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022; 327:1875-1887. [PMID: 35579641 PMCID: PMC9115619 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.5776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement and is the treatment of choice for patients at high operative risk. The role of TAVI in patients at lower risk is unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine whether TAVI is noninferior to surgery in patients at moderately increased operative risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized clinical trial conducted at 34 UK centers, 913 patients aged 70 years or older with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and moderately increased operative risk due to age or comorbidity were enrolled between April 2014 and April 2018 and followed up through April 2019. INTERVENTIONS TAVI using any valve with a CE mark (indicating conformity of the valve with all legal and safety requirements for sale throughout the European Economic Area) and any access route (n = 458) or surgical aortic valve replacement (surgery; n = 455). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year. The primary hypothesis was that TAVI was noninferior to surgery, with a noninferiority margin of 5% for the upper limit of the 1-sided 97.5% CI for the absolute between-group difference in mortality. There were 36 secondary outcomes (30 reported herein), including duration of hospital stay, major bleeding events, vascular complications, conduction disturbance requiring pacemaker implantation, and aortic regurgitation. RESULTS Among 913 patients randomized (median age, 81 years [IQR, 78 to 84 years]; 424 [46%] were female; median Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk score, 2.6% [IQR, 2.0% to 3.4%]), 912 (99.9%) completed follow-up and were included in the noninferiority analysis. At 1 year, there were 21 deaths (4.6%) in the TAVI group and 30 deaths (6.6%) in the surgery group, with an adjusted absolute risk difference of -2.0% (1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 1.2%; P < .001 for noninferiority). Of 30 prespecified secondary outcomes reported herein, 24 showed no significant difference at 1 year. TAVI was associated with significantly shorter postprocedural hospitalization (median of 3 days [IQR, 2 to 5 days] vs 8 days [IQR, 6 to 13 days] in the surgery group). At 1 year, there were significantly fewer major bleeding events after TAVI compared with surgery (7.2% vs 20.2%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.45]) but significantly more vascular complications (10.3% vs 2.4%; adjusted HR, 4.42 [95% CI, 2.54 to 7.71]), conduction disturbances requiring pacemaker implantation (14.2% vs 7.3%; adjusted HR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.43 to 2.94]), and mild (38.3% vs 11.7%) or moderate (2.3% vs 0.6%) aortic regurgitation (adjusted odds ratio for mild, moderate, or severe [no instance of severe reported] aortic regurgitation combined vs none, 4.89 [95% CI, 3.08 to 7.75]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients aged 70 years or older with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and moderately increased operative risk, TAVI was noninferior to surgery with respect to all-cause mortality at 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION isrctn.com Identifier: ISRCTN57819173.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William D Toff
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, England
- National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, England
| | - David Hildick-Smith
- Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, England
| | - Jan Kovac
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, England
- National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, England
| | - Michael J Mullen
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, England
| | - Olaf Wendler
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Anita Mansouri
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Ines Rombach
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Keith R Abrams
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, England
- Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, England
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, England
| | - Simon P Conroy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, England
| | - Marcus D Flather
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England
| | - Alastair M Gray
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Philip MacCarthy
- Department of Cardiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Mark J Monaghan
- Department of Cardiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | | | - Simon Ray
- Department of Cardiology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
| | | | | | - John G F Cleland
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics and Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Mark A de Belder
- National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, England
| | - Peter F Ludman
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham University, Birmingham, England
| | - Stephen Jones
- Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Cameron G Densem
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England
| | - Steven Tsui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, England
| | - Manoj Kuduvalli
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Joseph D Mills
- Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, England
| | - Adrian P Banning
- Department of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England
| | - Rana Sayeed
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England
| | - Ragheb Hasan
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
| | - Douglas G W Fraser
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - Uday Trivedi
- Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, England
| | - Simon W Davies
- Cardiac Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Alison Duncan
- Cardiac Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Nick Curzen
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, England
| | - Sunil K Ohri
- Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, England
| | | | - Pankaj Kaul
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England
| | - Douglas F Muir
- Department of Cardiology, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, England
| | - W Andrew Owens
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, England
| | - Neal G Uren
- Edinburgh Heart Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Renzo Pessotto
- Edinburgh Heart Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Simon Kennon
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, England
| | - Wael I Awad
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, England
| | - Saib S Khogali
- Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, England
| | | | - Richard J Edwards
- Cardiothoracic Department, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, England
| | | | - Miles Dalby
- Department of Cardiology, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Shahzad G Raja
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| | - Giovanni Mariscalco
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, England
- National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, England
| | - Clinton Lloyd
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, England
| | - Ian D Cox
- Department of Cardiology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, England
| | - Simon R Redwood
- Cardiovascular Division, King's College London, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London, England
| | - Mark G Gunning
- Cardiology Department, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, England
| | - Paul D Ridley
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, England
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patterson T, McConkey HZR, Ahmed-Jushuf F, Moschonas K, Nguyen H, Karamasis GV, Perera D, Clapp BR, Roxburgh J, Blauth C, Young CP, Redwood SR, Pavlidis AN. Long-Term Outcomes Following Heart Team Revascularization Recommendations in Complex Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 8:e011279. [PMID: 30943827 PMCID: PMC6507188 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.118.011279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background The Heart Team (HT) comprises integrated interdisciplinary decision making. Current guidelines assign a Class Ic recommendation for an HT approach to complex coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there remains a paucity of data in regard to hard clinical end points. The aim was to determine characteristics and outcomes in patients with complex CAD following HT discussion. Methods and Results This observational study was conducted at St Thomas’ Hospital (London, UK). Case mixture included unprotected left main, 2‐vessel (including proximal left anterior descending artery) CAD, 3‐vessel CAD, or anatomical and/or clinical equipoise. HT strategy was defined as optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone, OMT+percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or OMT+coronary artery bypass grafting. From April 2012 to 2013, 51 HT meetings were held and 398 cases were discussed. Patients tended to have multivessel CAD (74.1%), high SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores (median, 30; interquartile range, 23–39), and average age 69±11 years. Multinomial logistic regression analysis performed to determine variables associated with HT strategy demonstrated decreased likelihood of undergoing PCI compared with OMT in older patients with chronic kidney disease and peripheral vascular disease. The odds of undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared with OMT decreased in the presence of cardiogenic shock and left ventricular dysfunction and increased in younger patients with 3‐vessel CAD. Three‐year survival was 60.8% (84 of 137) in the OMT cohort, 84.3% (107 of 127) in the OMT+PCI cohort, and 90.2% in the OMT+coronary artery bypass grafting cohort (92 of 102). Conclusions In our experience, the HT approach involved a careful selection process resulting in appropriate patient‐specific decision making and good long‐term outcomes in patients with complex CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Patterson
- 1 Division of Cardiovascular The Rayne Institute BHF Centre of Research Excellence King's College London St. Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Z R McConkey
- 1 Division of Cardiovascular The Rayne Institute BHF Centre of Research Excellence King's College London St. Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Fiyyaz Ahmed-Jushuf
- 2 Department of Cardiothoracic Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
| | - Konstantinos Moschonas
- 3 Department of Cardiology King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
| | - Hanna Nguyen
- 1 Division of Cardiovascular The Rayne Institute BHF Centre of Research Excellence King's College London St. Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | | | - Divaka Perera
- 1 Division of Cardiovascular The Rayne Institute BHF Centre of Research Excellence King's College London St. Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Brian R Clapp
- 2 Department of Cardiothoracic Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
| | - James Roxburgh
- 2 Department of Cardiothoracic Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Blauth
- 2 Department of Cardiothoracic Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
| | - Christopher P Young
- 2 Department of Cardiothoracic Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
| | - Simon R Redwood
- 1 Division of Cardiovascular The Rayne Institute BHF Centre of Research Excellence King's College London St. Thomas' Hospital London United Kingdom
| | - Antonis N Pavlidis
- 2 Department of Cardiothoracic Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Young CP, Sinha S, Vohra HA. Outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 53:ii19-ii23. [PMID: 29718235 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement has been used for more than 20 years, but its uptake has been limited. The volumes have increased steadily over the last 10 years, but it is still not regarded as a mainstream procedure. The issue, to some extent, is due to the lack of perceived evidence that minimal access incisions confer any benefit other than cosmetic appearance. In this article, the current literature on minimally invasive aortic valve replacement is reviewed, and it is concluded that benefits are demonstrable, particularly in higher risk, comorbid settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shubhra Sinha
- The Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Marlborough Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Hunaid A Vohra
- The Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Marlborough Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arri SS, Patterson T, Williams RP, Moschonas K, Young CP, Redwood SR. Myocardial revascularisation in high-risk subjects. Heart 2017; 104:166-179. [PMID: 29180542 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Satpal S Arri
- Cardiovascular Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tiffany Patterson
- Cardiovascular Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rupert P Williams
- Cardiovascular Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Christopher P Young
- Cardiovascular Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon R Redwood
- Cardiovascular Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Olatunde Falode
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khawaja MZ, Asrress KN, Haran H, Arri S, Nadra I, Bolter K, Wilson K, Clack L, Hancock J, Young CP, Bapat V, Thomas M, Redwood S. The effect of coronary artery disease defined by quantitative coronary angiography and SYNTAX score upon outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Edwards bioprosthesis. EUROINTERVENTION 2016; 11:450-5. [PMID: 24832041 DOI: 10.4244/eijy14m05_09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS We sought to evaluate the effects of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) upon outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a retrospective study of 271 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI using either the Edwards SAPIEN or Edwards SAPIEN XT valve. Pre-procedural coronary angiograms were analysed by quantitative coronary angiography (defining significant CAD as a stenosis of ≥70% or ≥50% if in the left main stem or a vein graft). Ninety-three out of 271 patients had significant CAD. There was no difference in mortality at 30 days or 12 months between the two groups (6.7% vs. 7.5% and 21.5% vs. 23.7%; log-rank p=0.805). A secondary analysis using the SYNTAX algorithm of coronary anatomy complexity was performed on 189 patients. Those in the high SYNTAX score (>33) group had higher mortality at 30 days and 12 months (14.3% and 57.1%) than the low (5.2% and 23.3%) and intermediate-risk groups (11.1% and 22.2%; log-rank p=0.007). ROC analysis identified a SYNTAX score of >9 at the time of TAVI as the optimal cut-off, with an independent association with mortality (HR 1.95 [95% CI: 1.21-3.13]; p=0.006). Patients with a SYNTAX score >9 had greater 30-day, 12-month and overall mortalities than those with a SYNTAX score <9 (3.7% vs. 11.3% and 20.7% vs. 34.3%; log-rank p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Significant CAD, as defined using "real-world" QCA margins, did not have a significant effect upon mortality after TAVI for severe aortic stenosis. However, higher-risk SYNTAX groups, including those with a score >9, had increased mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammed Zeeshan Khawaja
- British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Cardiovascular Division, The Rayne Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Attia RQ, Hickey GL, Grant SW, Bridgewater B, Roxburgh JC, Kumar P, Ridley P, Bhabra M, Millner RWJ, Athanasiou T, Casula R, Chukwuemka A, Pillay T, Young CP. Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study from the UK National Data. Innovations 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/155698451601100104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rizwan Q. Attia
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Graeme L. Hickey
- Centre for Health Informatics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stuart W. Grant
- Centre for Health Informatics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, UK
| | - Ben Bridgewater
- Centre for Health Informatics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, UK
| | - James C. Roxburgh
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Pankaj Kumar
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Morriston, Swansea, UK
| | - Paul Ridley
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Moninder Bhabra
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Russell W. J. Millner
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Victoria Hospital NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - Thanos Athanasiou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Roberto Casula
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Andrew Chukwuemka
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Thasee Pillay
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Davies WR, Bapat VN, Hancock JE, Young CP, Redwood SR, Thomas MR. Direct TAVI using a balloon-expandable system: a novel technique to eliminate pre-deployment balloon aortic valvuloplasty. EUROINTERVENTION 2015; 10:248-52. [PMID: 24952059 DOI: 10.4244/eijv10i2a40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is now the therapy of choice for those patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are considered to be at too high risk for conventional surgery. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is routinely performed to allow placement of the balloon-expandable valve during the procedure. Instrumentation of the valve has been linked to procedural stroke risk, with the associated runs of rapid pacing risking haemodynamic compromise. We outline a novel technique to eliminate BAV prior to transcatheter valve placement. METHODS AND RESULTS We illustrate a clinical case that outlines the problems encountered in transcatheter valve placement despite a prior BAV. The solution used in this case involved the partial inflation of the distal section of the balloon allowing easy passage of the SAPIEN XT valve from the transaortic route. After bench testing, we report a series of patients who have undergone this "direct TAVI" procedure from both the transaortic and the transfemoral routes. CONCLUSIONS In a limited series within a single centre, "direct TAVI" has been shown to be effective in allowing accurate placement of a balloon-expandable device without the need for prior BAV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R Davies
- Cardiovascular Department, St ThomasÕ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ludman PF, Moat N, de Belder MA, Blackman DJ, Duncan A, Banya W, MacCarthy PA, Cunningham D, Wendler O, Marlee D, Hildick-Smith D, Young CP, Kovac J, Uren NG, Spyt T, Trivedi U, Howell J, Gray H. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United Kingdom: temporal trends, predictors of outcome, and 6-year follow-up: a report from the UK Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Registry, 2007 to 2012. Circulation 2015; 131:1181-90. [PMID: 25637628 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.114.013947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed trends in the performance of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United Kingdom from the first case in 2007 to the end of 2012. We analyzed changes in case mix, complications, outcomes to 6 years, and predictors of mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS Annual cohorts were examined. Mortality outcomes were analyzed in the 92% of patients from England and Wales for whom independent mortality tracking was available. A total of 3980 transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures were performed. In successive years, there was an increase in frequency of impaired left ventricular function, but there was no change in Logistic EuroSCORE. Overall 30-day mortality was 6.3%; it was highest in the first cohort (2007-2008), after which there were no further significant changes. One-year survival was 81.7%, falling to 37.3% at 6 years. Discharge by day 5 rose from 16.7% in 2007 and 2008 to 28% in 2012. The only multivariate preprocedural predictor of 30-day mortality was Logistic EuroSCORE ≥40. During long-term follow-up, multivariate predictors of mortality were preprocedural atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, creatinine >200 μmol/L, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease. The strongest independent procedural predictor of long-term mortality was periprocedural stroke (hazard ratio=3.00; P<0.0001). Nonfemoral access and postprocedural aortic regurgitation were also significant predictors of adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS We analyzed transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an entire country, with follow-up over 6 years. Although clinical profiles of enrolled patients remained unchanged, longer-term outcomes improved, and patients were discharged earlier. Periprocedural stroke, nonfemoral access, and postprocedural aortic regurgitation are predictors of adverse outcome, along with intrinsic patient risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter F Ludman
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Neil Moat
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Mark A de Belder
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Daniel J Blackman
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Alison Duncan
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Winston Banya
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Philip A MacCarthy
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - David Cunningham
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Olaf Wendler
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Damian Marlee
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - David Hildick-Smith
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Christopher P Young
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Jan Kovac
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Neal G Uren
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Tomasz Spyt
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Uday Trivedi
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Jonathan Howell
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | - Huon Gray
- From Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK (P.F.L.); Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital, London, UK (N.M., A.D.); James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK (M.A.d.B.); Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK (D.J.B.); Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (W.B.); Kings College Hospital, London, UK (P.A.M., O.W.); National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcome Research, London, UK (D.C., D.M.); Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK (D.H.-S., U.T.); St. Thomas's Hospital, London, UK (C.P.Y.); Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital NHS Trust, Leicester, UK (J.K., T.S.); Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (N.G.U.); West Midlands Public Health England Centre, Birmingham, UK (J.H.); and University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK (H.G.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khawaja MZ, Williams R, Hung J, Arri S, Asrress KN, Bolter K, Wilson K, Young CP, Bapat V, Hancock J, Thomas M, Redwood S. Impact of preprocedural mitral regurgitation upon mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis. Heart 2014; 100:1799-803. [PMID: 25155800 PMCID: PMC4215343 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify the effects of preprocedural significant mitral regurgitation (MR) and change in MR severity upon mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Edwards SAPIEN system. Methods A retrospective analysis of 316 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI for aortic stenosis at a single centre in the UK between March 2008 and January 2013. Patients were stratified into two groups according to severity of MR: ≥grade 3 were classed as significant and ≤grade 2 were non-significant. Change in MR severity was assessed by comparison of baseline and 30-day echocardiograms. Results 60 patients had significant MR prior to TAVI (19.0%). These patients were of higher perioperative risk (logistic EuroScore 28.7±16.6% vs 20.3±10.7%, p=0.004) and were more dyspnoeic (New York Heart Association class IV 20.0% vs 7.4%, p=0.014). Patients with significant preprocedural MR displayed greater 12-month and cumulative mortality (28.3% vs 20.2%, log-rank p=0.024). Significant MR was independently associated with mortality (HR 4.94 (95% CI 2.07 to 11.8), p<0.001). Of the 60 patients with significant MR only 47.1% had grade 3–4 MR at 30 days (p<0.001). Patients in whom MR improved had lower mortality than those in whom it deteriorated (log-rank p=0.05). Conclusions Significant MR is frequently seen in patients undergoing TAVI and is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality. Yet almost half also exhibit significant improvements in MR severity. Those who improve have better outcomes, and future work could focus upon identifying factors independently associated with such an improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Z Khawaja
- Cardiovascular Division, King's College, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, The Rayne Institute, London, UK Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Williams
- Cardiovascular Division, King's College, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, The Rayne Institute, London, UK Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Hung
- Cardiovascular Division, King's College, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, The Rayne Institute, London, UK
| | - S Arri
- Cardiovascular Division, King's College, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, The Rayne Institute, London, UK Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K N Asrress
- Cardiovascular Division, King's College, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, The Rayne Institute, London, UK Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Bolter
- Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Wilson
- Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C P Young
- Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Bapat
- Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Hancock
- Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Thomas
- Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Redwood
- Cardiovascular Division, King's College, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, The Rayne Institute, London, UK Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pavlidis A, Perera D, Clapp B, Blauth C, Young CP, Roxburgh J, Bapat V, Chambers J, Thomas M, Redwood S. TCT-314 Outcome and reproducibility of Heart Team decisions: a single center experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
14
|
Khawaja MZ, Thomas M, Joshi A, Asrress KN, Wilson K, Bolter K, Young CP, Hancock J, Bapat V, Redwood S. The effects of VARC-defined acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Edwards bioprosthesis. EUROINTERVENTION 2013; 8:563-70. [PMID: 22995082 DOI: 10.4244/eijv8i5a87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) after TAVI, a potentially serious complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) that has been redefined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC). METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a retrospective analysis of 248 patients undergoing TAVI. AKI was defined as a VARC-modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage (RIFLE) kidney disease score ≥ 2. Eighty-nine patients suffered AKI (35.9%) and demonstrated increased mortality at 30 days (13.5% vs. 3.8%) and one year (31.5% vs. 15.0%) (p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis identified diabetes mellitus (p<0.001), peripheral vascular disease (p=0.007), chronic kidney disease stage (p=0.010) as independently associated risk factors for AKI. CONCLUSIONS More than one third of patients sustain AKI after TAVI using the Edwards bioprosthesis, as defined by the VARC-modified RIFLE score. AKI increased the mortality at both 30 days and at one year. A history of diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease and higher chronic kidney disease stage had the strongest independent associations with post-TAVI AKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammed Zeeshan Khawaja
- King's College London, BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Cardiovascular Division, The Rayne Institute, London, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Papalexopoulou N, Young CP, Attia RQ. What is the best timing of surgery in patients with post-infarct ventricular septal rupture? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 16:193-6. [PMID: 23143273 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'in which patients with a post-infarct ventricular septal rupture (PIVSR) might immediate surgery give better results than delayed surgery in terms of mortality'? Altogether, 88 papers were found using the reported search criteria, of which 6 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The recommendations are based on outcomes from 3238 patients undergoing surgery for PIVSR. Mean age was 67.5 ± 8.8 (40-88 years). Left ventricular function was compromised in most patients with mean ejection fraction of 40%. All papers carried out univariate and/or multivariate analyses of variables that contributed to different in-hospital mortalities. Early surgery, i.e. from >3 days to within 4 weeks after MI, had an overall in-hospital mortality of 52.4%; delayed surgery, typically from 1 week to after 4 weeks post-myocardial infarction, had an overall operative in-hospital mortality of 7.56%. Most authors observe that a shorter time between rupture and surgery is an unfavourable predictor of outcome independent of haemodynamic status. The consensus was that nearly all patients with PIVSR, particularly if >15 mm diameter with a significant shunt and resultant haemodynamic deterioration, should undergo early surgical repair. The precise timing of surgery depends on patients' haemodynamic status. Exclusion from surgery should be considered if life expectancy or quality is severely limited by another limiting underlying pathology. If the patient is in cardiogenic shock, due to pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratio shunt rather than infarct size, immediate surgery should follow resuscitation measures and cardiac support. If the patient is haemodynamically stable, surgery could be performed after 3-4 weeks of medical optimization with inotropic and mechanical cardiac support. If there is clinical deterioration, immediate surgery is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niovi Papalexopoulou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kamaledeen A, Attia RQ, Roxburgh JC, Young CP, Blauth CI. The use of homografts in the operative management of infective endocarditis has lower short and medium-term mortality and improved overall outcome compared to prosthetic valves. Int J Surg 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.06.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
17
|
Moat NE, Ludman P, de Belder MA, Bridgewater B, Cunningham AD, Young CP, Thomas M, Kovac J, Spyt T, MacCarthy PA, Wendler O, Hildick-Smith D, Davies SW, Trivedi U, Blackman DJ, Levy RD, Brecker SJD, Baumbach A, Daniel T, Gray H, Mullen MJ. Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: the U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:2130-8. [PMID: 22019110 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 682] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2011] [Revised: 07/26/2011] [Accepted: 08/09/2011] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective was to define the characteristics of a real-world patient population treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), regardless of technology or access route, and to evaluate their clinical outcome over the mid to long term. BACKGROUND Although a substantial body of data exists in relation to early clinical outcomes after TAVI, there are few data on outcomes beyond 1 year in any notable number of patients. METHODS The U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry was established to report outcomes of all TAVI procedures performed within the United Kingdom. Data were collected prospectively on 870 patients undergoing 877 TAVI procedures up until December 31, 2009. Mortality tracking was achieved in 100% of patients with mortality status reported as of December 2010. RESULTS Survival at 30 days was 92.9%, and it was 78.6% and 73.7% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. There was a marked attrition in survival between 30 days and 1 year. In a univariate model, survival was significantly adversely affected by renal dysfunction, the presence of coronary artery disease, and a nontransfemoral approach; whereas left ventricular function (ejection fraction <30%), the presence of moderate/severe aortic regurgitation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remained the only independent predictors of mortality in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS Midterm to long-term survival after TAVI was encouraging in this high-risk patient population, although a substantial proportion of patients died within the first year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil E Moat
- Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Scarci M, Fallouh HB, Young CP, Chambers DJ. Does intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation provide equivalent myocardial protection compared to cardioplegia in patients undergoing bypass graft revascularisation? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2009; 9:872-8. [PMID: 19666649 DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2009.209437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: does intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation provide equivalent myocardial protection compared to cardioplegia in patients undergoing bypass graft revascularisation? Altogether, 58 papers were found using the reported search, of which 13 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We identified 13 studies, of which eight were randomised prospective trials. None of these studies found increased mortality, seven analyzed serum cardiac enzymes and showed that intermittent ischemic arrest provides equal or better protection compared to cardioplegic techniques. Two studies found an increased usage of inotropes and intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) in the intermittent ischemic arrest group. We conclude that intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation is a versatile and cost-effective method of myocardial protection, with the immediate postoperative outcome comparable to cardioplegic arrest in first-time coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The ischaemic duration associated with intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation is invariably shorter than that associated with cardioplegic arrest, and this may be one explanation for the comparable outcomes. There may also be an element of preconditioning protection during the intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation method, as has been shown experimentally. During elective CABG in patients with no clinical evidence of aortic or cerebro-vascular disease, the incidence of peri-operative microemboli (ME) and postoperative neuropsychological disturbances are shown to be comparable with both techniques of myocardial preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Scarci
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 6th Floor, St Thomas Hospital, London, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hunt I, Faircloth ME, Sinha P, Marber MS, Venn GE, Young CP. Aortocoronary dissection complicating angioplasty of chronically occluded right coronary arteries: Is a conservative approach the right approach? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131:230-1. [PMID: 16399319 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.08.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2005] [Accepted: 08/17/2005] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Hunt
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Olatunde Falode
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hunt I, Deshpande RP, Aps C, Young CP. Helping hands--a simple technique to ensure a secure sternal closure following open cardiac surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005; 87:63. [PMID: 15729754 PMCID: PMC1963833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- I Hunt
- Cardiothoracic Centre, St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hunt I, Deshpande RP, Aps C, Young CP. Delayed Paraplegia After Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair: Timing of Reinsertion of Spinal Drain. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78:2213; author reply 2214. [PMID: 15561090 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
24
|
Abstract
Inflammatory pseudotumour (IP) of the heart is an extremely uncommon and potentially fatal lesion which presents a challenging diagnosis even for the experienced pathologist, cardiologist and cardiac surgeon. This spindle cell tumour is known to be present in virtually every anatomical region but, in adults, has only previously been found in the heart at postmortem. We report the case of a 27-year-old man who presented with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and a right ventricular mass which was subsequently shown to be an IP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kasis
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late aneurysm formation is a well-recognized complication of surgery for aortic coarctation. Open surgery to repair these aneurysms is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoluminal repair is an attractive alternative to open surgery. METHODS Data were collected prospectively on consecutive patients who presented with aneurysms associated with coarctation RESULTS Between June 1999 and October 2001, 5 patients underwent elective endoluminal repair for coarctation aneurysms. All procedures were technically successful and no patients died. Four patients previously had open surgery to repair aortic coarctation, and 1 presented with an aneurysm associated with a previously unrecognized coarctation. The median follow-up was 7 months (range, 3 to 29 months), and to date, all aneurysms remain excluded. CONCLUSIONS Endoluminal repair is a promising alternative to redo open surgery for thoracic aneurysms associated with previous surgery for aortic coarctation. Long-term follow-up is required to assess the durability of the stent grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel E Bell
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Abstract
Suction drains can be used as alternatives to conventional underwater seal drains following cardiac surgery, and may be advantageous under some circumstances. The authors present a case where a suction drain eroded into the right ventricle causing near-fatal haemorrhage following coronary artery surgery. Caution should be exercised in taking the decision to use suction drains, the material from which they are manufactured should be chosen carefully, and close attention paid to their positioning within the mediastinum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R S Uppal
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Myocardial protection with blood cardioplegia during cardiac surgery is increasingly preferred, but few studies have compared the protective effects of crystalloid cardioplegia to the same solution with blood as the only variable. This clinical study compared the protective effects of crystalloid or blood-based St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution No. 1. METHODS Fifty higher risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery, with an ejection fraction less than 40%, were randomly allocated to receive cold (4 degrees C) intermittent crystalloid St. Thomas' No. 1 cardioplegia (n = 25), or a similar blood-based solution (n = 25) with a haematocrit of 10-12%. We determined (1) peri-operative and post-operative arrhythmias, (2) left and right ventricular function (24 h) using the thermodilution technique, (3) left ventricular high-energy phosphate content sampled before ischaemia, the end of ischaemia and the end of bypass. RESULTS Pre-operative haemodynamic data, aortic cross-clamp and bypass times were similar in both groups of patients; there was no mortality. At the end of ischaemia there were no differences in ATP content between groups but creatine phosphate was maintained at a significantly (P < 0.007) higher level in the blood-based St. Thomas' cardioplegia group than the crystalloid St. Thomas' cardioplegia group (20+/-2 (SE) vs. 13+/-1 micromol/g dry wt, respectively). Return to spontaneous sinus rhythm was significantly (P = 0.002) increased in the blood-based St. Thomas' cardioplegia group (96%) compared to the crystalloid St. Thomas' cardioplegia group (60%). Early post-operative ventricular dysfunction occurred in both groups, but normal LV function (stroke work index) recovered significantly (P = 0.043) more rapidly (by 2 h) in the blood-based St. Thomas' cardioplegia group of patients. CONCLUSIONS In a higher risk (EF < 40%) group of patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery, addition of blood to an established crystalloid cardioplegic solution significantly enhanced myocardial protection by reducing arrhythmias, improving rate of recovery of function and maintaining myocardial high-energy phosphate content during ischaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M F Ibrahim
- Cardiac Surgical Research and Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Rayne Institute, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Galiñanes M, Watson C, Trivedi U, Chambers DJ, Young CP, Venn GE. Differential patterns of neutrophil adhesion molecules during cardiopulmonary bypass in humans. Circulation 1996; 94:II364-9. [PMID: 8901776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neutrophils are activated during cardiopulmonary bypass, and it is believed that they play an important role in the postoperative inflammatory response. The effects of neutrophils are mediated by the surface adhesion molecules L-selectin, beta 2-integrins, and platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1), and it has been reported that beta 2-integrins are upregulated and L-selectin downregulated by cardiopulmonary bypass. However, the time course of these changes and their relative importance are unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS To investigate the temporal changes in the expression of the neutrophil surface adhesion molecules L-selectin, beta 2-integrins, and PECAM-1 induced by cardiopulmonary bypass, we used immunofluorescent flow cytometry in blood samples obtained at various times (before anesthesia, before bypass, and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 24, and 48 hours after initiation of bypass) from patients undergoing routine coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesthesia had no effect on the expression of any of the study molecules. The expression of all beta 2-integrins was not significantly affected during the entire study period. The mean fluorescence (expressed as a percentage of control) of CD18 did not change significantly during the first 2 hours after the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, but then it declined by 4 hours (P = NS) and attained its lowest values after 24 and 48 hours. The mean fluorescence of CD11b and CD11c decreased by 2 and 4 hours and remained reduced after 24 hours and 48 hours. The expression of PECAM-I decreased rapidly after the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass to achieve 60 +/- 8% of the preanesthesia control values (P < .05) after only 1 hour; it fell to its lowest after 4 hours (44 +/- 8%; P < .05); and then it recovered partially by 24 hours (60 +/- 11%; P < .05), with a further recovery toward control after 48 hours (77 +/- 8%; P = NS). The profile for the mean fluorescence of PECAM-I was identical to that observed with its expression. In contrast, the expression and mean fluorescence of L-selectin were not changed during the 48-hour period. CONCLUSIONS This study has demonstrated that cardiopulmonary bypass in humans induces (1) a rapid reduction in the expression of PECAM-I of circulating neutrophils, (2) a later reduction of beta 2-intergrin activity without significant changes in their expression, and (3) no alterations in the expression and activity of L-selectin. Thus, although the mechanism for the absence of neutrophil upregulation of beta 2-integrins and downregulation of L-selectin (no activation) remains to be elucidated, the downregulation of PECAM-1 indicates an early neutrophil activation, and its inhibition may represent a target for reducing the inflammatory response usually associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Galiñanes
- Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experimentally, creatine phosphate (CP) improves postischemic recovery of function and reduces postischemic arrhythmias. METHODS We studied 50 patients undergoing valve replacement. They were randomized into either a control group, who received St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution No. 1, or a CP-treated group, receiving the same cardioplegic solution plus CP (10 mmol/L). There were no preoperative clinical differences between groups. Assessment was by electrocardiographic analysis, inotropic drug requirement, quantitative birefringence, myocardial high-energy phosphate content, function, and semiquantitative ultrastructural assessment. RESULTS Direct-current shocks were reduced in the CP-treated group (0.88 +/- 0.15) compared with the control group (1.40 +/- 0.14; p < 0.02), as was the total number of joules (22.0 +/- 3.5 versus 34.4 +/- 3.7, respectively; p <0.02). The incidence of spontaneous sinus rhythm was higher in the CP-treated group (40% versus 8%; p < 0.05) and the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias, lower (8% versus 32%; p < 0.05). Prolonged inotropic administration (12 hours or longer) occurred in fewer patients in the CP-treated group (4% versus 28%; p < 0.05). Response to inotropic support (in the subset of patients requiring this treatment) was significantly greater in the CP-treated group than in the control group. There were no differences in recovery of function, birefringence changes, myocardial high-energy phosphate content, or ultrastructure between groups. CONCLUSIONS St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution No. 1 plus CP enhanced myocardial protection and conferred a direct benefit to the patient by reducing postoperative arrhythmias and need of prolonged inotropic support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Chambers
- Cardiac Surgical Research, Rayne Institute, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chambers DJ, Haire K, Morley N, Strumia E, Young CP, Venn GE. Exogenous creatine phosphate, added to St Thomas' Hospital cardioplegia no 1 (STH1), enhances myocardial protection in valve surgery patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1995. [DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)92734-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
32
|
O'Keefe PA, Ninan M, Ayers B, Young CP. Aortic valve replacement with the Jyros bileaflet prosthetic valve; early echocardiographic and radiological evaluation. J Heart Valve Dis 1995; 4 Suppl 1:S77-9; discussion 79-80. [PMID: 8581217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The Jyros bileaflet prosthetic heart valve has a unique hinge mechanism permitting rotation of the leaflets within the valve ring. Thirty patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a Jyros valve were assessed clinically, echocardiographically and radiologically. Rotation of the valve in vivo was assessed, as well as the hemodynamic characteristics of the valve at rest and after exercise, and functional capacity of the valve recipients. Measured transvalvar gradients were comparable with other bileaflet valves at rest and after exercise, as were calculated effective orifice areas. Initially only four prostheses (13%) showed any evidence of rotating, but this improved to 14 of 23 investigated (60.9%) after exercise; rotation appears to be more common in smaller valves. There were no operative or early deaths, but one patient died at 11 months from a type A ascending aortic dissection. During a total of 28.5 patient-years of follow up (range 2-24 months) valve related complication has not been reported. All survivors are in good clinical condition. Preliminary results with the Jyros valve compare well with other bileaflet devices for aortic valve replacement; the hemodynamic performance of the valve does not appear to be affected by rotation or non-rotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A O'Keefe
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Trivedi UH, Black JJ, Aps C, Young CP. Adult respiratory distress syndrome following closure of a chronic ventricular septal defect: possible relationship to the use of intracardiac gelatin-resorcin-formaldehyde glue. Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 3:349-50. [PMID: 7655855 DOI: 10.1016/0967-2109(95)93890-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Gelatin-resorcin-formaldehyde glue is now widely used in cardiac surgery, particularly in Europe. A case is reported where its use may have contributed to the pulmonary dysfunction seen postoperatively after elective closure of a postinfarct ventricular septal defect. It is believed that this is a result of a relatively high exposure of the pulmonary circulation to the glue, in particular to formalin. Although not proven, the authors advise caution when using the glue within the cardiac chambers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U H Trivedi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Young CP. Current position of dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 2:124. [PMID: 8049918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
35
|
Abstract
A man with a crush injury of his upper abdomen developed bilateral pulmonary empyema after repair of tears of the oesophagus and liver. Attempts to withdraw chest drains led to recurrent septicaemia, treated by reinsertion of the drains plus administration of antibiotics. The communication of the empyema space with both the bronchial tree and the oesophagus was managed successfully with intermittent positive pressure ventilation and with a double lumen endobronchial tube isolating the right lung for 10 days. Traumatic rupture of the thoracic oesophagus carries a high mortality and prompt repair is vital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C P Young
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Carli G, Cosma E, Domenico A, Macrì A, Young CP. Pollution by halogenated aromatic compounds at Trissino: A case study of groundwater contamination and rehabilitation. Disasters 1983; 7:266-275. [PMID: 20958547 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1983.tb00834.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
An investigation is presented on industrial contamination by benzotrifluoride percolation into ground water used for drinking water, in a populated area of 20 km(2) at Trissino, north Italy, due to improper chemical waste disposal. Hydrogeological features of the situation are reported, as well as the emergency action taken, such as the surveys made and their analytical results. The epidemiology of the emergency is examined and rehabilitation measures are presented and discussed. Fortunately no major ecological or social disaster occurred, In part thanks to the speed and efficiency with which the affair was handled. It is notable that the authorities kept the public duly informed and thus retained their confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Carli
- Presidio Sanitario Multizonale USL/8. Vicenza, Italy Settore Ecologieo Regione Veneto Venezia. Italy Instituto Stiperiore di Sanità Roma, Italy Water Research Centre Medmenham, U.K
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|