The effect of Share 35 on biliary complications: An interrupted time series analysis

The purpose of the Share 35 allocation policy was to improve liver transplant waitlist mortality, targeting high MELD waitlisted patients. However, policy changes may also have unintended consequences that must be balanced with the primary desired outcome. We performed an interrupted time series assessing the impact of Share 35 on biliary complications in a select national liver transplant population using the Vizient CDB/RM database. Liver transplants that occurred between October 2012 and September 2015 were included. There was a significant change in the incident-rate of biliary complications between Pre-Share 35 (n = 3018) and Post-Share 35 (n = 9984) cohorts over time (P = .023, r²  = .44). As a control, a subanalysis was performed throughout the same time period in Region 9 transplant centers, where a broad sharing agreement had previously been implemented. In the subanalysis, there was no change in the incident-rate of biliary complications between the two time periods. Length of stay and mean direct cost demonstrated a change after implementation of Share 35, although they did not meet statistical difference. While the target of improved waitlist mortality is of utmost importance for the equitable allocation of organs, unintended consequences of policy changes should be studied for a full assessment of a policy's impact.

Mobile Health in Solid Organ Transplant: The Time Is Now

Despite being in existence for >40 years, the application of telemedicine has lagged significantly in comparison to its generated interest. Detractors include the immobile design of most historic telemedicine interventions and the relative lack of smartphones among the general populace. Recently, the exponential increase in smartphone ownership and familiarity have provided the potential for the development of mobile health (mHealth) interventions that can be mirrored realistically in clinical applications. Existing studies have demonstrated some potential clinical benefits of mHealth in the various phases of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Furthermore, studies in nontransplant chronic diseases may be used to guide future studies in SOT. Nevertheless, substantially more must be accomplished before mHealth becomes mainstream. Further evidence of clinical benefits and a critical need for cost-effectiveness analysis must prove its utility to patients, clinicians, hospitals, insurers, and the federal government. The SOT population is an ideal one in which to demonstrate the benefits of mHealth. In this review, the current evidence and status of mHealth in SOT is discussed, and a general path forward is presented that will allow buy-in from the health care community, insurers, and the federal government to move mHealth from research to standard care.

Big Data, Predictive Analytics, and Quality Improvement in Kidney Transplantation: A Proof of Concept

We sought proof of concept of a Big Data Solution incorporating longitudinal structured and unstructured patient-level data from electronic health records (EHR) to predict graft loss (GL) and mortality. For a quality improvement initiative, GL and mortality prediction models were constructed using baseline and follow-up data (0-90 days posttransplant; structured and unstructured for 1-year models; data up to 1 year for 3-year models) on adult solitary kidney transplant recipients transplanted during 2007-2015 as follows: Model 1: United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data; Model 2: UNOS & Transplant Database (Tx Database) data; Model 3: UNOS, Tx Database & EHR comorbidity data; and Model 4: UNOS, Tx Database, EHR data, Posttransplant trajectory data, and unstructured data. A 10% 3-year GL rate was observed among 891 patients (2007-2015). Layering of data sources improved model performance; Model 1: area under the curve (AUC), 0.66; (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60, 0.72); Model 2: AUC, 0.68; (95% CI: 0.61-0.74); Model 3: AUC, 0.72; (95% CI: 0.66-077); Model 4: AUC, 0.84, (95 % CI: 0.79-0.89). One-year GL (AUC, 0.87; Model 4) and 3-year mortality (AUC, 0.84; Model 4) models performed similarly. A Big Data approach significantly adds efficacy to GL and mortality prediction models and is EHR deployable to optimize outcomes.

A National Survey Assessing the Current Workforce of Transplant Pharmacists Across Accredited U.S. Solid Organ Transplant Programs

Integration of pharmacists into multidisciplinary transplant patient care has advanced in recent years, with limited data available to evaluate the current status of the profession. This was a national survey developed as an AST Pharmacy COP initiative. Responses were solicited from pharmacists practicing at U.S. transplant programs based on UNOS listing; 176 participants from 113 centers (41%) responded, with 79% practicing ≤10 years. There is a median of 1.4 pharmacist full-time equivalents (FTEs) (range 0.1-7.1) for every 100 transplants. The predominant activities performed by pharmacists during the transplant phase include medication review (95%), lab review (92%), allergy review (88%), medication therapy management (92%), bedside rounds (87%), medication education (79%), documentation (71%), and coordinating discharge medications (58%). Similar activities were reported during the other phases, but participation was less common. The involvement of dedicated transplant pharmacists within multidisciplinary care has become standard at a large number of centers, although expansion is still needed to ensure core pharmaceutical care components are provided to all transplant recipients across all centers. These results inform on the typical responsibilities of pharmacists practicing within the field of transplantation and illustrate that the level of pharmacist involvement significantly varies across transplant centers and the phases of transplantation.

Improving transplant patient safety through pharmacist discharge medication reconciliation

Greater than 50% of medication errors are estimated to occur during transitions of care, and solid-organ transplant recipients are at an increased risk for errors due to significant changes in their medication regimen following transplantation. This prospective, observational study with a historical control group was conducted to evaluate the discharge process for transplant recipients and determine if transplant pharmacist involvement would improve safety. During the prospective period, a total of 191 errors were made on discharge medication reconciliations (n = 64, mean rate 3.0 per patient); however, pharmacists prevented 119 of these errors (1.9 errors per patient). In the retrospective period, none of the 430 errors identified were prevented at the time of discharge (n = 128, p < 0.0001). The 72 errors not prevented at the time of discharge in the prospective cohort were identified by the pharmacist at the patient's first clinic visit (1.1 errors per patient). In the historical cohort, all 430 errors made at discharge persisted until at least the time of the first clinic visit (3.4 errors per patient, p < 0.0001). This study demonstrates that transplant recipients are at a high risk for medication errors and that transplant pharmacist involvement leads to improved safety through the significant reduction of medication errors.

Disruptions in the supply of medications used in transplantation: implications and management strategies for the transplant clinician

Drug shortages are a threat to patient care and public health, and the number of drugs on shortage is growing at an exponential rate. The major therapy areas affected by these shortages are oncology, anti-infective, cardiovascular and central nervous system. However, drugs utilized in the transplant patient population have not been exempt, and can have significant influence on posttransplant outcomes. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current and historical solid organ transplant-related disruptions in the supply of medications and implications on patient care and safety. Transplant centers should be armed with an implementation plan when imperative transplant-related drugs such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate, or antithymocyte globulin go on shortage. This plan should provide steps to manage the shortage, and provide effective therapeutic alternatives.

The impact of early corticosteroid withdrawal on graft survival in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

There has been increased interest in recent years in reducing or eliminating steroids from the immunosuppression regimen of transplant recipients to reduce adverse effects associated with their use. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between early versus late steroid withdrawal after liver transplant to determine the optimal duration of steroid use in this population.

METHODS

This large-scale, retrospective analysis of liver transplants occurred at our institution between 2000 and 2009. Patients were excluded if they were <18 years old, received a multiorgan transplant, or remained on steroids for >1 year. The early steroid withdrawal group had steroids eliminated by 3 months posttransplant; late steroid withdrawal patients had steroids withdrawn between 3 and 12 months posttransplant.

RESULTS

A total of 586 liver transplants occurred during the study period; 330 patients were included in the analysis. Graft survival was significantly lower in the early steroid withdrawal group. There was no difference in patient survival or overall acute rejection. However, the late steroid withdrawal group had a significantly higher rate of early acute rejection episodes. There was no difference with regard to new-onset diabetes after transplant, hyperlipidemia, or cardiovascular events between groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that late corticosteroid withdrawal is associated with better long-term graft survival without increasing the rates of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or cardiovascular events in liver transplant recipients. A prospective study is warranted to confirm these findings.

Evolution of the role of the transplant pharmacist on the multidisciplinary transplant team

Transplant pharmacists have been recognized as an essential part of the transplant team by their colleagues along with several governing and professional organizations. The specific education, training and responsibilities of the transplant pharmacist have not been clearly delineated in the literature. Various pharmacists across the country have been called upon to serve on the transplant team necessitating standardization of their fundamental and desirable activities. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript is to describe the training and role of a transplant pharmacist on the patient care team and provide a roadmap to implementation of novel transplant pharmacy services.

The use of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in solid organ transplant patients: a case series

BACKGROUND

Drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA), a recombinant human activated protein C, is indicated for the reduction of mortality in patients with severe sepsis who have a high risk of death. In the initial trial, DAA demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality at 28 days for patients treated with DAA in comparison with standard supportive treatment (placebo). However, solid organ transplant recipients were excluded from the study. Transplant recipients are at an increased risk for sepsis and there is minimal literature describing the safety and efficacy of DAA in the transplant population.

METHODS

Thirteen solid organ transplant recipients who received DAA between November 2001 and January 2004 were included in this case series. Patients were prospectively identified and data collection occurred concurrently and by retrospective chart review. All patients met the DAA use criteria based on the institutional standard protocol.

RESULTS

We report the outcomes of the 13 adult transplant patients who received a total of 14 courses of DAA for severe sepsis. At the time of DAA initiation, all patients required mechanical ventilation, 86% necessitated vasopressor support, and had a median of 3 dysfunctional organs. The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at initiation was 30. Overall, hemodynamic stability and APACHE II score improved at the end of DAA infusion. Causes of early discontinuation were bleeding (57%), scheduled procedure (14%), increased international normalized ratio (14%), and death (14%). In-hospital, 28-day, and 1-year mortality was 69%, 62%, and 83%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DAA appears to be safe with appropriate monitoring. However, transplant recipients had a higher incidence of bleeding events leading to early discontinuation of DAA. Efficacy is difficult to assess without an appropriate control group for comparison.

Valganciclovir prophylaxis in patients at high risk for the development of cytomegalovirus disease

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in antiviral therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading opportunistic infection in the transplant population. Valganciclovir (VGC), the L-valyl ester prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), provides an excellent oral alternative to GCV for the prevention of CMV in transplant recipients. We investigated the use of VGC for CMV prevention in high-risk renal and pancreas transplant recipients.

METHODS

Patients at high risk for development of CMV disease were defined as either those who had donor positive, recipient-negative serostatus (D+/R-), or those who received antilymphocyte antibody (ALA) therapy for either rejection treatment or induction. A retrospective review was conducted of all kidney and pancreas transplants performed between August 2001 and December 2003. A total of 341 transplants were performed, of which 109 received VGC, and 88 were included in this analysis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of CMV disease was 5.7% (5/88). All of the CMV episodes were in patients who were D+/R- (17.2% [5/29] versus 0% [0/59], P<0.001). Of these patients, all the episodes of CMV were in patients who received VGC prophylaxis for<100 days post transplant (29% [5/17] versus 0% [0/12], P=0.06). The overall incidence of leukopenia was 11% and thrombocytopenia was 7%, with the incidence between the D+/R- group and the ALA group being similar.

CONCLUSION

VGC is an effective agent in preventing CMV disease in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients who are at high risk for developing the disease. The optimal length of prophylaxis in D+/R- patients is still undefined, while 3 months of prophylaxis appears to be sufficient in patients who received ALA therapy.

Long-Term outcome of sirolimus rescue in Kidney–Pancreas transplantation

The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome of sirolimus (SRL) rescue in kidney-pancreas transplantation (KPTx). We reviewed 112 KPTx performed at our institution from 12/3/95 to 6/27/02. All patients received antibody (Ab) induction, tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. Thirty-five patients (31%) had SRL substituted for MMF for the following indications: (1) acute rejection (AR) of kidney or pancreas despite adequate TAC levels; (2) intolerance of full-dose MMF; (3) rising creatinine; and (4) TAC-induced hyperglycemia. Target SRL and TAC levels were 10 ng/mL and 5 ng/mL, respectively. Mean follow-up was 3 +/- 2 years overall and 1.2 +/- 0.5 years after SRL rescue. No patients died. One- and 3-year actuarial kidney and pancreas graft survival was 97%, 97%, and 95%, 90%, respectively. Of 10 patients switched to SRL for AR, 1 kidney failed from Ab-resistant AR, 1 kidney developed borderline AR, and the other 8 remain AR-free. Seven other patients developed AR despite therapeutic SRL levels; of these, 6 (86%) had mean TAC levels of <4.5 in the month preceding AR. Mean creatinine overall and for the rising creatinine group remained stable. All patients switched to SRL for TAC-induced hyperglycemia or MMF intolerance demonstrated biochemical or clinical improvement. Sirolimus-related infection or other serious adverse events (SAE) were uncommon. In conclusion, KPTx recipients can be safely switched to SRL with long-term stabilization of renal function, excellent graft and patient survival, and no increase in SAE. A minimum TAC level of 4.5 ng/mL may be necessary to prevent late AR.

Does treatment of cadaveric organ donors with desmopressin increase the likelihood of pancreas graft thrombosis? results of a preliminary study

Desmopressin (DDAVP) is commonly used in cadaveric organ donors to treat diabetes insipidus. The thrombogenic potential of DDAVP is well known. Recent animal data have demonstrated that DDAVP impairs pancreas graft (PG) microcirculation and perfusion. The aim of this study was too evaluate the effect of DDAVP on the incidence of PG thrombosis in clinical pancreas transplantation. A retrospective review of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) entered in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) between 10/5/87 and 9/27/02 was performed. Patients were included for analysis if there was definitive documentation as to whether DDAVP was (DDAVP-Y) or was not (DDAVP-N) administered to the donor. Both dose and duration of DDAVP treatment were not recorded by SRTR. A total of 2804 SKPTs were available for analysis. Mean follow-up was 1.75 years (range, 1 month to 8.4 years). A total of 1287 SKPT patients (46%) received a PG from a DDAVP-Y donor. Graft ischemia times, donor and recipient ages, recipient gender distribution, surgical techniques, and immunosuppressive regimens were similar in both groups. The overall incidence of PG thrombosis was 4.3%. The incidence of PG thrombosis in recipients of grafts from DDAVP-Y donors was 5.1% compared to 3.5% in recipients of grafts from DDAVP-N donors (P =.04). Fifty-eight percent of thrombosed PG came from DDAVP-Y donors compared to 42% from DDAVP-N donors (P =.04). We conclude that there appears to be a relationship between donor treatment with DDAVP and PG thrombosis. A prospective study is needed to verify these findings and to determine their clinical significance.

Blue urticaria: a previously unreported adverse event associated with isosulfan blue

The sentinel node hypothesis is predicated on the fact that a metastasis, if it exists, will have traveled on a direct path from the primary tumor through the efferent lymphatic channels to the first draining lymph node in the regional lymphatic basin, the sentinel node. Lymphatic mapping with isosulfan blue and sentinel lymphadenectomy is being increasingly used in the management of patients with melanoma, breast cancer, and other solid tumors. This trend is exposing an increasing number of patients to isosulfan blue. Although this compound is generally safe, severe reactions have been reported. We describe 2 patients who developed "blue hives" after isosulfan blue injection.