Using problem solving therapy to treat veterans with subsyndromal depression: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a pilot study comparing problem solving therapy for primary care (PST-PC) to a dietary education control condition in middle-aged and older veterans with symptoms of emotional distress and subsyndromal depression.

METHODS

This was a two-site study at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System and Philadelphia VA Medical Center. Participants included veterans >50 years of age referred from primary care clinics who were eligible if they obtained a pre-screen score >11 on the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale. Exclusions were a DSM-IV Major Depressive Episode within the past year, active substance abuse/dependence within 1 month, current antidepressant therapy, and a Mini mental status exam score <24. Participants were randomized to receive one of two interventions--either PST-PC or an attention control condition consisting of dietary education (DIET)--each consisting of six to eight sessions within a 4-month period.

RESULTS

Of 45 individuals randomized, 23 (11 PST-PC and 12 DIET) completed treatment. Using regression models in completers that examined outcomes at end of treatment while controlling for baseline scores, there were significant differences between treatment groups in SF-36 mental health component scores but not in depressive symptoms (as assessed with either the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or the Beck Depression Inventory), social problem solving skills, or physical health status (SF-36 physical health component score).

CONCLUSIONS

These pilot study findings suggest that a six-to-eight session version of PST-PC may lead to improvements in mental health functioning in primary care veterans with subsyndromal depressive symptoms.

A "SMART" design for building individualized treatment sequences

Interventions often involve a sequence of decisions. For example, clinicians frequently adapt the intervention to an individual's outcomes. Altering the intensity and type of intervention over time is crucial for many reasons, such as to obtain improvement if the individual is not responding or to reduce costs and burden when intensive treatment is no longer necessary. Adaptive interventions utilize individual variables (severity, preferences) to adapt the intervention and then dynamically utilize individual outcomes (response to treatment, adherence) to readapt the intervention. The Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) provides high-quality data that can be used to construct adaptive interventions. We review the SMART and highlight its advantages in constructing and revising adaptive interventions as compared to alternative experimental designs. Selected examples of SMART studies are described and compared. A data analysis method is provided and illustrated using data from the Extending Treatment Effectiveness of Naltrexone SMART study.

Pharmacological treatment of depression in older primary care patients: the PROSPECT algorithm

PROSPECT (Prevention of Suicide in Primary care Elderly-Collaborative Trial) is testing whether a trained clinician (the 'health specialist') can work in close collaboration with a primary care physician to implement a comprehensive depression management program and improve outcomes in older depressed patients. An algorithm guiding the selection and use of antidepressant medications has been developed to assist PROSPECT health specialists. This algorithm is presented and the rationale underlying the proposed treatment sequence is discussed. The PROSPECT algorithm builds upon existing guidelines after updating them and adapting them to the special circumstances of older primary care patients. Special attention has been paid to the tolerability and the target doses of the recommended antidepressant agents and to the duration of antidepressant trials. Patients who are unable to tolerate or do not respond to an antidepressant can be switched to another agent or be treated with interpersonal psychotherapy. Agents that produce only a partial response can be combined with other antidepressants or with interpersonal psychotherapy. Treatments for which empirical evidence exists are favored. However, treatments that are often poorly tolerated by elderly patients are given lower priority than treatments more likely to be tolerated. Similarly, trials that are simpler to implement in primary care are favored.

Alcohol related dementia: proposed clinical criteria

Current diagnostic criteria for Alcohol Related Dementia (ARD) are based almost exclusively on clinical judgment. Moreover, there are no guidelines available to assist the clinician or the researcher in distinguishing Alcohol Related Dementia from other causes of dementia such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD). However, this distinction may have implications for the prognosis and treatment of patients. In this article, provisional diagnostic criteria for establishing a diagnosis of Alcohol Related Dementia are proposed for further study. The criteria are based on the available literature on the relationship between alcohol consumption and dementia and were modeled after existing diagnostic criteria for AD and Vascular Dementia. Validity of these criteria for distinguishing AD from ARD will require further study.

Naltrexone as an adjunctive treatment for older patients with alcohol dependence

The authors examined the efficacy of naltrexone as an adjunctive treatment for alcohol dependence in older adults. Forty-four veterans over 50 years of age were enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy study of naltrexone (the equivalent of 50 mg per day). There were no differences in the frequency of any self-reported adverse effects or in liver enzyme values between the placebo- and naltrexone-treated groups. There were no differences between the treatment groups in the number of subjects remaining abstinent or in the number of subjects who relapsed. However, all placebo-treated subjects relapsed after sampling alcohol, whereas only three of six naltrexone-treated subjects met relapse criteria after alcohol exposure (P = 0.024). The authors conclude that naltrexone was well tolerated and efficacious in preventing relapse in subjects who drank.

Tolerability of naltrexone in treating older, alcohol-dependent patients

The authors conducted an interim analysis of the tolerability of naltrexone among older, alcohol-dependent adults. Thirty-six subjects over 50 years old were enrolled in a 12-week, double blind, placebo-controlled efficacy study of naltrexone. Sixteen subjects received naltrexone and were compared with the placebo group for the development of adverse effects. Self-reported adverse effects did not differ in frequency or duration between the placebo and naltrexone groups. There were no significant differences in laboratory values between the two groups. Naltrexone was well tolerated with no clinically significant adverse effects. However, the efficacy of naltrexone has yet to be determined in this age group.

Lessons from geriatric psychiatry in the long-term care setting

Of all long-term care settings, the nursing home has served as the most productive laboratory for the study of the mental health problems of late life. Lessons from geriatric psychiatry research and practice in the nursing home have relevance to general psychiatry and to other health care settings, informing us about (a) psychiatric disorders in medically ill and disabled populations; (b) subsyndromes and subtypes of depression; (c) behavioral disturbances in patients with brain injury; (d) the effects of government regulation and education on mental health care; and (e) essential roles for psychiatrists in changing health care systems. Selected areas of knowledge based on geriatric psychiatry research and experience in long term care are reviewed in this paper, and their applications for the field of psychiatry in general are explored.