1
|
Bellini BB, Scholz JR, Abe TO, Arnaut D, Tonstad S, Alberto RL, Gaya PV, de Moraes IRA, Teixeira MJ, Marcolin MA. Does deep TMS really works for smoking cessation? A prospective, double blind, randomized, sham controlled study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2024; 132:110997. [PMID: 38531486 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.110997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A substantial proportion of smokers wishing to quit do not stop smoking when using current therapies to aid cessation. Magnetic pulses to specific brain areas designated as transcranial magnetic stimulation may modulate brain activity and thereby change chemical dependencies. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) with the H4 coil stimulates neuronal pathways in the lateral prefrontal cortex and insula bilaterally, areas involved in tobacco addiction. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dTMS with T4 coil in smoking cessation. METHODS In a double blind, controlled clinical trial, adult smokers of at least 10 cigarettes/day were randomized to active (n = 50) versus sham dTMS (n = 50). The protocol involved up to 21 sessions administered over up to 12 weeks. Tobacco use was monitored by self-report and confirmed by expired air monoximetry (at each dTMS visit) and blood cotinine (at the screening visit and at the end of sessions). Participants completed abstinence, mood and cognition scales at determined timepoints during follow-up. RESULTS In the intention to-treat-analysis, the cessation rate of the intervention and control groups was 14.0%. The reported side effects were as expected for this procedure. Although there were no serious adverse events, three participants were withdrawn according to safety criteria. CONCLUSION Active treatment with dTMS H4 coil was safe but not effective for smoking cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca B Bellini
- Department of Preventive Medicine- Smoking Cessation Program, Incor (Heart Institute), Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Neurology Department of Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Jaqueline R Scholz
- Department of Preventive Medicine- Smoking Cessation Program, Incor (Heart Institute), Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Tania O Abe
- Department of Preventive Medicine- Smoking Cessation Program, Incor (Heart Institute), Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Debora Arnaut
- Neurology Department of Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Serena Tonstad
- Department of Preventive Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rodrigo L Alberto
- Neurology Department of Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Patricia V Gaya
- Department of Preventive Medicine- Smoking Cessation Program, Incor (Heart Institute), Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Iana R A de Moraes
- Department of Preventive Medicine- Smoking Cessation Program, Incor (Heart Institute), Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Manoel J Teixeira
- Neurology Department of Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco A Marcolin
- Neurology Department of Clinical Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barboza VR, Kubota GT, da Silva VA, Barbosa LM, Arnaut D, Rodrigues ALDL, Galhardoni R, Cury RG, Barbosa ER, Brunoni AR, Teixeira MJ, de Andrade DC. Parkinson's Disease-related Pains are Not Equal: Clinical, Somatosensory and Cortical Excitability Findings in Individuals With Nociceptive Pain. J Pain 2023; 24:2186-2198. [PMID: 37442404 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain is a frequent and burdensome nonmotor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). PD-related chronic pain can be classified as nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic, the former being the most frequent subtype. However, differences in neurophysiologic profiles between these pain subtypes, and their potential prognostic and therapeutic implications have not been explored yet. This is a cross-sectional study on patients with PD (PwP)-related chronic pain (ie, started with or was aggravated by PD). Subjects were assessed for clinical and pain characteristics through questionnaires and underwent quantitative sensory tests and motor corticospinal excitability (CE) evaluations. Data were then compared between individuals with nociceptive and non-nociceptive (ie, neuropathic or nociplastic) pains. Thirty-five patients were included (51.4% male, 55.7 ± 11.0 years old), 20 of which had nociceptive pain. Patients with nociceptive PD-related pain had lower warm detection threshold (WDT, 33.34 ± 1.39 vs 34.34 ± 1.72, P = .019) and mechanical detection threshold (MDT, 2.55 ± 1.54 vs 3.86 ± .97, P = .007) compared to those with non-nociceptive pains. They also presented a higher proportion of low rest motor threshold values than the non-nociceptive pain ones (64.7% vs 26.6%, P = .048). In non-nociceptive pain patients, there was a negative correlation between WDT and non-motor symptoms scores (r = -.612, P = .045) and a positive correlation between MDT and average pain intensity (r = .629, P = .038), along with neuropathic pain symptom scores (r = .604, P = .049). It is possible to conclude that PD-related chronic pain subtypes have distinctive somatosensory and CE profiles. These preliminary data may help better frame previous contradictory findings in PwP and may have implications for future trial designs aiming at developing individually-tailored therapies. PERSPECTIVE: This work showed that PwP-related nociceptive chronic pain may have distinctive somatosensory and CE profiles than those with non-nociceptive pain subtypes. These data may help shed light on previous contradictory findings in PwP and guide future trials aiming at developing individually-tailored management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Debora Arnaut
- Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Ricardo Galhardoni
- Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rubens Gisbert Cury
- Movement Disorders Group, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Egberto Reis Barbosa
- Movement Disorders Group, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Andre Russowsky Brunoni
- Laboratory of Neuroscience and National Institute of Biomarkers in Psychiatry, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research & Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Neuromodulation, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira
- Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Movement Disorders Group, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
- Pain Center, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg E, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Listik C, Cury RG, Casagrande SCB, Listik E, Arnaut D, Santiago N, Da Silva VA, Galhardoni R, Machado JDLA, de Almeida JC, Barbosa ER, Teixeira MJ, De Andrade DC. Improvement of Non-motor Symptoms and Quality of Life After Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Dystonia: A 1-Year Follow-Up. Front Neurol 2021; 12:717239. [PMID: 34671310 PMCID: PMC8520898 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.717239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a treatment option for refractory dystonia's motor symptoms, while its non-motor symptoms (NMS) have been less systematically assessed. We aimed to describe the effects of DBS on NMS in refractory generalized inherited/idiopathic dystonia prospectively. Methods: We evaluated patients before and 1 year after DBS surgery and applied the following scales: Burke–Fahn–Marsden Rating Scale (BFMRS), NMS Scale for Parkinson's Disease (NMSS-PD), Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8, short-form Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), and short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Results: Eleven patients (38.35 ± 11.30 years) underwent surgery, all with generalized dystonia. Motor BFMRS subscore was 64.36 ± 22.94 at baseline and 33.55 ± 17.44 1 year after DBS surgery (47.9% improvement, p = 0.003). NMSS-PD had a significant change 12 months after DBS, from 70.91 ± 59.07 to 37.18 ± 55.05 (47.5% improvement, p = 0.013). NMS changes were mainly driven by changes in the gastrointestinal (p = 0.041) and miscellaneous domains (p = 0.012). Seven patients reported chronic pain before DBS and four after it. BPI's severity and interference scores were 4.61 ± 2.84 and 4.12 ± 2.67, respectively, before surgery, and 2.79 ± 2.31 (0.00–6.25) and 1.12 ± 1.32 (0.00–3.00) after, reflecting a significant improvement (p = 0.043 and p = 0.028, respectively). NPSI score was 15.29 ± 13.94 before, while it was reduced to 2.29 ± 2.98 afterward (p = 0.028). MPQ's total score was 9.00 ± 3.32 before DBS, achieving 2.71 ± 2.93 after (p = 0.028). Conclusions: DBS improves NMS in generalized inherited/idiopathic dystonia, including chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarice Listik
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rubens Gisbert Cury
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Eduardo Listik
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Debora Arnaut
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Natally Santiago
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Ricardo Galhardoni
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Egberto Reis Barbosa
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cury RG, Galhardoni R, Fonoff ET, Dos Santos Ghilardi MG, Fonoff F, Arnaut D, Myczkowski ML, Marcolin MA, Bor-Seng-Shu E, Barbosa ER, Teixeira MJ, Ciampi de Andrade D. Effects of deep brain stimulation on pain and other nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2014; 83:1403-9. [PMID: 25217059 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000000887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To prospectively evaluate the effect of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on the different characteristics of pain and other nonmotor symptoms (NMS) in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). METHODS Forty-four patients with PD and refractory motor symptoms were screened for STN-DBS. Patients were evaluated before and 1 year after surgery. The primary outcome was change in pain prevalence after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were changes in motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale), characteristics of pain and other NMS using specific scales and questionnaires, and quality of life. RESULTS Forty-one patients completed the study. The prevalence of pain changed from 70% to 21% after surgery (p < 0.001). There were also significant improvements in pain intensity, NMS, and quality of life after STN-DBS (p < 0.05). Dystonic and musculoskeletal pain responded well to DBS, while central pain and neuropathic pain were not influenced by surgery. There was a strong correlation between the change in pain intensity and the improvement in quality of life (r = 0.708, p < 0.005). No correlation was found between pain improvement and preoperative response to levodopa or motor improvement during stimulation (r = 0.247, p = 0.197 and r = 0.249, p = 0.193, respectively) or with changes in other NMS. CONCLUSIONS STN-DBS decreased pain after surgery, but had different effects in different types of PD-related pain. Motor and nonmotor symptom improvements after STN-DBS did not correlate with pain relief. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class IV evidence that in patients with idiopathic PD with refractory motor fluctuations, STN-DBS decreases the prevalence of pain and improves quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubens G Cury
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Galhardoni
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Erich T Fonoff
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Maria G Dos Santos Ghilardi
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Fonoff
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Debora Arnaut
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Martin L Myczkowski
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco A Marcolin
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Edson Bor-Seng-Shu
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Egberto R Barbosa
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Manoel J Teixeira
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
- From the Pain Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., R.G., E.T.F., M.J.T., D.C.d.A.), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Laboratory, Psychiatry Institute (E.T.F., D.A., M.L.M., M.A.M., M.J.T.), Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (R.G.C., E.R.B., M.J.T.), and Neurosurgery Division, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine (E.T.F., M.G.d.S.G., F.F., E.B.-S.-S., M.J.T.), University of São Paulo; and Pain Center (R.G.C., M.J.T.), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|