1
|
Kim J, Harris A, Pitt H, Saraiya B, Jabbour SK, Deek MP, Moore DF, Kim S, Ennis RD. Unplanned Hospitalization and Subsequent Mortality in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Concomitant Chemo-/Immuno-Therapy and Radiotherapy: An Analysis of Over 10,000 Patients in a Nationwide Database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S92-S93. [PMID: 37784605 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Radiotherapy (RT) and concomitant chemotherapy (CHT) is a major modality for treating many malignancies including lung cancer and is associated with toxicity-related unplanned hospitalization (UPH). Previous investigations of factors associated with UPH have been single institutional retrospective studies and none assessed the role of concurrent immunotherapy (IO). Here, we aimed to identify factors associated with UPH and in-hospital mortality by leveraging a multi-institutional nationwide database. MATERIALS/METHODS The Vizient® Clinical Data Base which includes data from 98% of the AAMC hospitals and 110 cancer hospitals, was queried for lung cancer patients (any histology) treated in 2019-2021 with RT+CHT/IO. Endpoints were UPH and mortality during or within 30 days of completion of RT. The variables included age, sex, race, ethnicity, income level (quartile), an education level (quartile), any concomitant CHT or IO drugs, RT technique (3D vs. IMRT vs. SBRT), obesity, prior hospitalization within 3 months, prior oncologic surgery within 3 months, prior CHT and/or IO within 3 months, insurance types, hospital types (Rural vs. Urban, AAMC vs. non-AAMC, NCCN vs. non-NCCN, bed size tertile). Logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with UPH and in-hospital mortality. Data from the Vizient Clinical Data Base used with permission of Vizient, Inc. All rights reserved. RESULTS A total of 10,337 patients were included. The rate of UPH and mortality among UPH was 24.5% and 3.2%, respectively. Factors associated with UPH included other races (vs. White, OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.11-1.88; p<0.001), living in a low income zip code (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.39-2.09; p = 0.0006), living in a zip code with lower education attainment (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.86; p = 0.0007), CHT/IO types (cis-etoposide vs. carbo-Taxol, OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.13-1.57; p<0.0001), obesity (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.53-1.92; p<0.0001), prior hospitalization (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.80-2.22; p<0.0001), prior oncologic surgery (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.22-0.52; p<0.0001), other primary payers (vs. commercial; OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.37-2.23; p<0.0001), rural hospital (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.07-1.62, p<0.01), small bed size (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.5-0.71; p<0.0001). Factors associated with in-hospital mortality included CHT/IO type (p<0.0001, but cis-etoposide vs. carbo-taxol no difference), prior hospitalization (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.2-0.56; p<0.0001), AAMC (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.23-3.67; p = 0.007), bed size (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.38-0.88; p<0.01). CONCLUSION In the largest study to date regarding UPH and in-hospital mortality related to lung RT, we identified factors contributing to these endpoints. Future prospective studies are warranted to develop strategies to prevent these complications in high-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | - H Pitt
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ; Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - B Saraiya
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ; Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - S K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - M P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - D F Moore
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
| | - S Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - R D Ennis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Choucair K, Page SJ, Mattar BI, Dakhil CS, Nabbout NH, Deutsch JM, Truong QV, Truong PV, Moore DF, Cannon MW, Kallail KJ, Moore JA, Dakhil SR, Diab R, Kamran S, Reddy PS. Clinical Utility of Genomic Recurrence Risk Stratification in Early, Hormone-Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: Real-World Experience. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:155-161. [PMID: 36566135 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND RNA-based genomic risk assessment estimates chemotherapy benefit in patients with hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2-negative (ERBB2-) breast cancer (BC). It is virtually used in all patients with early HR+/ERBB2- BC regardless of clinical recurrence risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with early-stage (T1-3; N0; M0) HR+/ERBB2- BC who underwent genomic testing using the Oncotype DX (Exact Sciences) 21-genes assay. Clinicopathologic features were collected to assess the clinical recurrence risk, in terms of clinical risk score (CRS) and using a composite risk score of distant recurrence Regan Risk Score (RRS). CRS and RRS were compared to the genomic risk of recurrence (GRS). RESULTS Between January 2015 and December 2020, 517 patients with early-stage disease underwent genomic testing, and clinical data was available for 501 of them. There was statistically significant concordance between the 3 prognostication methods (P < 0.01). Within patients with low CRS (n = 349), 9.17% had a high GRS, compared to 8.93% in patients with low RRS (n = 280). In patients with grade 1 histology (n = 130), 3.85% had a high GRS and 68.46% had tumors > 1 cm, of whom only 4.49% had a high GRS. Tumor size > 1cm did not associate with a high GRS. CONCLUSION Genomic testing for patients with grade 1 tumors may be safely omitted, irrespective of size. Our finds call for a better understanding of the need for routine genomic testing in patients with low grade/low clinical risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalil Choucair
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Radwan Diab
- Kansas University School of Medicine, Wichita, KS
| | - Syed Kamran
- Kansas University School of Medicine, Wichita, KS
| | - Pavan S Reddy
- Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Kansas University School of Medicine, Wichita, KS.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hearon BF, Redelman KN, Elhomsy GC, Moore DF. Exceptional Regression of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma with Pembrolizumab Monotherapy. Case Rep Oncol 2021; 13:1483-1489. [PMID: 33442373 PMCID: PMC7772860 DOI: 10.1159/000512013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The lead author with clinical stage I malignant pleural mesothelioma, epithelioid type, highly programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive, and BAP1 negative, experienced a prompt and exceptionally favorable response to pembrolizumab monotherapy. After cessation of treatment due to immune-related endocrinopathies, complete metabolic response on interim PET/CT scan was achieved. Two years after initial diagnosis, unifocal tumor reactivation was addressed with successful pembrolizumab monotherapy rechallenge. Immunotherapy, typically not used as frontline treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma, may provide an effective and durable response for some patients. Based on this single case study, epithelioid type tumors with strongly positive PD-L1 and BAP1-negative immunohistochemical markers may be well suited for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard F Hearon
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas, USA
| | | | - Georges C Elhomsy
- Endocrine Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas, USA
| | - Dennis F Moore
- Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, Kansas, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Algazi A, Othus M, Daud A, Lo R, Mehnert J, Truong TG, Conry R, Kendra K, Doolittle G, Clark JI, Messino M, Moore DF, Lao C, Faller BA, Govindarajan R, Harker-Murray A, Dreisbach L, Moon J, Grossman K, Ribas A. Abstract CT013: SWOG S1320: Improved progression-free survival with continuous compared to intermittent dosing with dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with BRAF mutated melanoma. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-ct013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: BRAF and MEK inhibitors yield objective responses in the majority of BRAFV600E/K mutant melanoma patients, but acquired resistance limits response durations. Preclinical data suggests that intermittent dosing of these agents may delay acquired resistance by deselecting tumor cells that grow optimally in the presence of these agents. S1320 is a randomized phase 2 clinical trial designed to determine whether intermittent versus continuous dosing of dabrafenib and trametinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced BRAFV600E/K melanoma.
Methods: All patients received continuous dabrafenib and trametinib for 8-weeks after which non-progressing patients were randomized to receive either continuous treatment or intermittent dosing of both drugs on a 3-week-off, 5-week-on schedule. Unscheduled treatment interruptions of both drugs for > 14 days were not permitted. Responses were assessed using RECIST v1.1 at 8-week intervals scheduled to coincide with on-treatment periods for patients on the intermittent dosing arm. Adverse events were assessed using CTCAE v4 monthly. The design assumed exponential PFS with a median of 9.4 months using continuous dosing, 206 eligible patients and 156 PFS events. It had 90% power with a two-sided α = 0.2 to detect a change to a median with an a priori hypothesis that intermittent dosing would improve the median PFS to 14.1 months using a Cox model stratified by the randomization stratification factors.
Results: 242 patients were treated and 206 patients without disease progression after 8 weeks were randomized, 105 to continuous and 101 to intermittent treatment. 70% of patients had not previously received immune checkpoint inhibitors. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of baseline patient characteristics. The median PFS was statistically significantly longer, 9.0 months from randomization, with continuous dosing vs. 5.5 months from randomization with intermittent dosing (p = 0.064). There was no difference in overall survival between groups (median OS = 29.2 months in both arms p = 0.93) at a median follow up of 2 years. 77% of patient treated continuously discontinued treatment due to disease progression vs. 84% treated intermittently (p = 0.34).
Conclusions: Continuous dosing with the BRAF and MEK inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib yields superior PFS compared with intermittent dosing.
Support: NIH/NCI grants CA180888, CA180819, CA180820
Citation Format: Alain Algazi, Megan Othus, Adil Daud, Roger Lo, Janice Mehnert, Thach-Giao Truong, Robert Conry, Kari Kendra, Gary Doolittle, Joseph I. Clark, Michael Messino, Dennis F. Moore, Christopher Lao, Bryan A. Faller, Rangaswamy Govindarajan, Amy Harker-Murray, Luke Dreisbach, James Moon, Kenneth Grossman, Antoni Ribas. SWOG S1320: Improved progression-free survival with continuous compared to intermittent dosing with dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with BRAF mutated melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Othus
- 2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Janice Mehnert
- 4Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | | | - Gary Doolittle
- 8University of Kansas Hospital – Westwood Cancer Center, Westwood, KS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James Moon
- 2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Poppe MM, Yehia ZA, Baker C, Goyal S, Toppmeyer D, Kirstein L, Chen C, Moore DF, Haffty BG, Khan AJ. 5-Year Update of a Multi-Institution, Prospective Phase 2 Hypofractionated Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:694-700. [PMID: 32289474 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypofractionation in the setting of postmastectomy radiation (PMRT) is not currently the standard of care in most countries. Here we present a 5-year update of our multi-institutional, phase 2 prospective trial evaluating a novel 15-day hypofractionated PMRT regimen. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients were enrolled to receive 3.33 Gy daily to the chest wall (or reconstructed breast) and regional lymphatics in 11 fractions with an optional 4-fraction mastectomy scar boost. The primary endpoint was freedom from grade 3 or higher late non-reconstruction-related radiation toxicities. Toxicities were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Secondary endpoints included local and locoregional recurrence rates, cosmesis, and reconstruction complications. RESULTS After enrolling 69 patients with stage II-IIIa breast cancer, 67 women were eligible for analysis. At a median follow up of 54 months, there were no acute or late grade 3 and 4 nonreconstruction reported toxicities. The grade 2 or greater late toxicity rate was only 12% and comprised grade 2 pain, fatigue, and lymphedema that persisted beyond 6 months after completion of radiation therapy. Only 3 women (4.6%) experienced a chest wall or nodal recurrence as a first site of relapse. Freedom from local failure, including local failure after distant relapse, was 92% at 5 years, and the 5-year overall survival was 90%. CONCLUSIONS This is the first prospective trial conducted in the United States to demonstrate the safe and effective use of hypofractionated PMRT. We have demonstrated a low complication rate while achieving excellent local control. Toxicity was better than anticipated based on previously published series of PMRT toxicities. Although our fractionation was novel, the radiobiological equivalent dose is similar to other hypofractionation schedules. This trial was the basis for the creation of Alliance A221505 (RT CHARM), which is currently accruing patients in a phase 3 randomized design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew M Poppe
- Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - Zeinab A Yehia
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | - Laurie Kirstein
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Chunxia Chen
- Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - D F Moore
- Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - Bruce G Haffty
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Atif J Khan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jaoude DA, Moore JA, Moore MB, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Ablah E, Moore DF. Glioblastoma and Increased Survival with Longer Chemotherapy Duration. Kans J Med 2019. [DOI: 10.17161/kjm.v12i3.11795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
The five-year survival rate for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is low at approximately 4.7%. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) remains the standard of care. The optimal duration of therapy with TMZ is unknown. This study sought to evaluate the survival benefit of two years of treatment.
Methods
This was a retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with GBM and treated with TMZ for up to two years between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS). The results were compared to historical controls and data from previous clinical trials of patients treated up to one year.
Results
Data from 56 patients with confirmed GBM were evaluated. The OS probability was 54% (SE = 0.068) at one year, 28.3% (SE = 0.064) at two years, 17.8% (SE = 0.059) at three years, and 4% (SE = 0.041) at five years. Seven patients (12.5%) were treated with TMZ for two years. Their median time-to-progression was 28 months (95% CI = 5.0 - 28.0), and they had an increased survival probability at three years compared to other patients (log-rank test χ2 (1, N = 56) = 19.2, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
There may be an advantage for a longer duration of TMZ therapy among patients with GBM, but the sample size was too small for generalization. A multicenter prospective study is needed to dentify optimal duration of TMZ therapy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jaoude DA, Moore JA, Moore MB, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Ablah E, Moore DF. Glioblastoma and Increased Survival with Longer Chemotherapy Duration. Kans J Med 2019; 12:65-69. [PMID: 31489102 PMCID: PMC6710024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The five-year survival rate for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is low at approximately 4.7%. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) remains the standard of care. The optimal duration of therapy with TMZ is unknown. This study sought to evaluate the survival benefit of two years of treatment. METHODS This was a retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with GBM and treated with TMZ for up to two years between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS). The results were compared to historical controls and data from previous clinical trials of patients treated up to one year. RESULTS Data from 56 patients with confirmed GBM were evaluated. The OS probability was 54% (SE = 0.068) at one year, 28.3% (SE = 0.064) at two years, 17.8% (SE = 0.059) at three years, and 4% (SE = 0.041) at five years. Seven patients (12.5%) were treated with TMZ for two years. Their median time-to-progression was 28 months (95% CI = 5.0 - 28.0), and they had an increased survival probability at three years compared to other patients (log-rank test χ2 (1, N = 56) = 19.2, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS There may be an advantage for a longer duration of TMZ therapy among patients with GBM, but the sample size was too small for generalization. A multicenter prospective study is needed to identify optimal duration of TMZ therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Dennis F. Moore
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita,Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Galanis E, Anderson SK, Miller CR, Sarkaria JN, Jaeckle K, Buckner JC, Ligon KL, Ballman KV, Moore DF, Nebozhyn M, Loboda A, Schiff D, Ahluwalia MS, Lee EQ, Gerstner ER, Lesser GJ, Prados M, Grossman SA, Cerhan J, Giannini C, Wen PY. Phase I/II trial of vorinostat combined with temozolomide and radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results of Alliance N0874/ABTC 02. Neuro Oncol 2019; 20:546-556. [PMID: 29016887 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, has shown radiosensitizing properties in preclinical studies. This open-label, single-arm trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; phase I) and efficacy (phase II) of vorinostat combined with standard chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods Patients received oral vorinostat (300 or 400 mg/day) on days 1-5 weekly during temozolomide chemoradiation. Following a 4- to 6-week rest, patients received up to 12 cycles of standard adjuvant temozolomide and vorinostat (400 mg/day) on days 1-7 and 15-21 of each 28-day cycle. Association between vorinostat response signatures and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed based on RNA sequencing of baseline tumor tissue. Results Phase I and phase II enrolled 15 and 107 patients, respectively. The combination therapy MTD was vorinostat 300 mg/day and temozolomide 75 mg/m2/day. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation, hyperglycemia, fatigue, and wound dehiscence. The primary efficacy endpoint in the phase II cohort, OS rate at 15 months, was 55.1% (median OS 16.1 mo), and consequently, the study did not meet its efficacy objective. Most common treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities in the phase II component were lymphopenia (32.7%), thrombocytopenia (28.0%), and neutropenia (21.5%). RNA expression profiling of baseline tumors (N = 76) demonstrated that vorinostat resistance (sig-79) and sensitivity (sig-139) signatures had a reverse and positive association with OS/PFS, respectively. Conclusions Vorinostat combined with standard chemoradiation had acceptable tolerability in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Although the primary efficacy endpoint was not met, vorinostat sensitivity and resistance signatures could facilitate patient selection in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Keith Anderson
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Pathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kurt Jaeckle
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Minnesota
| | - Jan C Buckner
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Keith L Ligon
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karla V Ballman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Dennis F Moore
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, Kansas
| | - Michael Nebozhyn
- Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrey Loboda
- Data Analysis, Informatics & Analysis Department, Merck Research Laboratories, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Schiff
- Neuro-Oncology Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Glenn J Lesser
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Michael Prados
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Stuart A Grossman
- Department of Oncology, Medicine & Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jane Cerhan
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Townsend LW, Adams JH, Blattnig SR, Clowdsley MS, Fry DJ, Jun I, McLeod CD, Minow JI, Moore DF, Norbury JW, Norman RB, Reames DV, Schwadron NA, Semones EJ, Singleterry RC, Slaba TC, Werneth CM, Xapsos MA. Solar particle event storm shelter requirements for missions beyond low Earth orbit. Life Sci Space Res (Amst) 2018; 17:32-39. [PMID: 29753411 DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2018.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Protecting spacecraft crews from energetic space radiations that pose both chronic and acute health risks is a critical issue for future missions beyond low Earth orbit (LEO). Chronic health risks are possible from both galactic cosmic ray and solar energetic particle event (SPE) exposures. However, SPE exposures also can pose significant short term risks including, if dose levels are high enough, acute radiation syndrome effects that can be mission- or life-threatening. In order to address the reduction of short term risks to spaceflight crews from SPEs, we have developed recommendations to NASA for a design-standard SPE to be used as the basis for evaluating the adequacy of proposed radiation shelters for cislunar missions beyond LEO. Four SPE protection requirements for habitats are proposed: (1) a blood-forming-organ limit of 250 mGy-equivalent for the design SPE; (2) a design reference SPE environment equivalent to the sum of the proton spectra during the October 1989 event series; (3) any necessary assembly of the protection system must be completed within 30 min of event onset; and (4) space protection systems must be designed to ensure that astronaut radiation exposures follow the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J H Adams
- NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama
| | | | | | - D J Fry
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas
| | - I Jun
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California
| | - C D McLeod
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas
| | - J I Minow
- NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama
| | - D F Moore
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
| | - J W Norbury
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
| | - R B Norman
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
| | - D V Reames
- University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | - T C Slaba
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
| | - C M Werneth
- NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
| | - M A Xapsos
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
West HL, Moon J, Wozniak AJ, Mack P, Hirsch FR, Bury MJ, Kwong M, Nguyen DD, Moore DF, Miao J, Redman M, Kelly K, Gandara DR. Paired Phase II Studies of Erlotinib/Bevacizumab for Advanced Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma or Never Smokers With Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: SWOG S0635 and S0636 Trials. Clin Lung Cancer 2018; 19:84-92. [PMID: 28801183 PMCID: PMC5748264 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Before mutation testing of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene was recognized as highly associated with the activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), clinically defined patient populations with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) and never smokers were identified as likely to benefit from EGFR TKIs. From preclinical and clinical data suggesting potentially improved efficacy with a combination of an EGFR TKI and the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab, the Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) initiated paired phase II trials to evaluate the combination of erlotinib/bevacizumab in patients with advanced BAC (SWOG S0635) or never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (SWOG S0636). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients with BAC or adenocarcinoma with BAC features (SWOG S0635) or never smokers with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (SWOG S0636) received erlotinib 150 mg/day with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg until progression or prohibitive toxicity. Never smokers with BAC were preferentially enrolled to SWOG S0636. The primary endpoint for both trials was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 84 patients were enrolled in the SWOG S0635 trial and 85 in the SWOG S0636 trial. The objective response rate was 22% (3% complete response) in the SWOG S0635 trial and 50% (38% confirmed; 3% complete response) in the SWOG S0636 trial. The median progression-free survival was 5 and 7.4 months in the S0635 and S0636 trials, respectively. The median overall survival was 21 and 29.8 months, respectively. Toxicity consisted mainly of rash and diarrhea in both trials. CONCLUSION Although the field has moved toward molecular, rather than clinical, selection of patients as optimal candidates for EGFR TKI therapy, these results support the hypothesis that a subset of patients in whom erlotinib is particularly active could receive an incremental benefit from the addition of bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Moon
- Southwestern Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Philip Mack
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California, Davis, Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Martin J Bury
- Grand Rapids Community Clinical Oncology Program, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Myron Kwong
- Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, San Jose, CA
| | | | - Dennis F Moore
- Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS
| | - Jieling Miao
- Southwestern Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Mary Redman
- Southwestern Oncology Group Statistical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Karen Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California, Davis, Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - David R Gandara
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of California, Davis, Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peoples AR, Roscoe JA, Block RC, Heckler CE, Ryan JL, Mustian KM, Janelsins MC, Peppone LJ, Moore DF, Coles C, Hoelzer KL, Morrow GR, Dozier AM. Nausea and disturbed sleep as predictors of cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients: a multicenter NCORP study. Support Care Cancer 2016; 25:1271-1278. [PMID: 27995318 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3520-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a prevalent and distressing side effect of cancer and its treatment that remains inadequately understood and poorly managed. A better understanding of the factors contributing to CRF could result in more effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of CRF. The objectives of this study were to examine the prevalence, severity, and potential predictors for the early onset of CRF after chemotherapy cycle 1 in breast cancer patients. METHODS We report on a secondary data analysis of 548 female breast cancer patients from a phase III multi-center randomized controlled trial examining antiemetic efficacy. CRF was assessed by the Brief Fatigue Inventory at pre- and post-chemotherapy cycle 1 as well as by the four-day diary. RESULTS The prevalence of clinically relevant post-CRF was 75%. Linear regression showed that pre-treatment CRF, greater nausea, disturbed sleep, and younger age were significant risk factors for post-CRF (adjusted R2 = 0.39; P < 0.0001). Path modeling showed that nausea severity influenced post-CRF both directly and indirectly by influencing disturbed sleep. Similarly, pre-treatment CRF influenced post-CRF directly as well as indirectly through both nausea severity and disturbed sleep. Pearson correlations showed that changes in CRF over time were significantly correlated with concurrent changes in nausea severity (r = 0.41; P < 0.0001) and in disturbed sleep (r = 0.20; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION This study showed a high prevalence (75%) of clinically relevant CRF in breast cancer patients following their initial chemotherapy, and that nausea severity, disturbed sleep, pre-treatment CRF, and age were significant predictors of symptom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita R Peoples
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420658, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Joseph A Roscoe
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420658, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Robert C Block
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Charles E Heckler
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420658, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Julie L Ryan
- Department of Dermatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Karen M Mustian
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420658, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Michelle C Janelsins
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420658, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Luke J Peppone
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420658, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | | | - Charlotte Coles
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Saint Louis Park, MN, USA
| | | | - Gary R Morrow
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd., CU 420658, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| | - Ann M Dozier
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Till BG, Li H, Bernstein SH, Fisher RI, Burack WR, Rimsza LM, Floyd JD, DaSilva MA, Moore DF, Pozdnyakova O, Smith SM, LeBlanc M, Friedberg JW. Phase II trial of R-CHOP plus bortezomib induction therapy followed by bortezomib maintenance for newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: SWOG S0601. Br J Haematol 2015; 172:208-18. [PMID: 26492567 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Bortezomib is active in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), with approval in upfront and relapsed settings. Given inevitable recurrence following induction chemoimmunotherapy, maintenance approaches are a rational strategy to improve clinical outcomes. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of six cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) plus bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1 and 4 of 21 d cycles) followed by bortezomib maintenance (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 3 months for 2 years). Sixty-five eligible patients were enrolled. The treatment was well tolerated and toxicities were mainly haematological. The rate of grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy was low (5%). With a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 62%, and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 85%. At 5 years, PFS was 28% and OS was 66%. MCL International Prognostic Index scores were significantly associated with 2-year PFS, but did not predict long-term (≥5-year) PFS. Baseline Ki-67 index was significantly associated with survival. Combination R-CHOP with bortezomib followed by maintenance bortezomib appears to improve outcomes compared historically with R-CHOP alone, with prolonged remissions in a subset of patients. These results suggest that inclusion of bortezomib with induction chemotherapy and/or maintenance is promising in MCL and warrants further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian G Till
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.,University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hongli Li
- SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Steven H Bernstein
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Richard I Fisher
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - W Richard Burack
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Lisa M Rimsza
- Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Justin D Floyd
- Heartland NCORP/Saint Francis Medical Center, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA
| | - Marco A DaSilva
- Southeast Cancer Consortium-Upstate NCORP/Kingsport Hem & Onc Associates, Kingsport, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Steensma DP, Dakhil SR, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, Johnson DB, Anderson DM, Mattar BI, Moore DF, Nikcevich D, Loprinzi CL. A randomized comparison of once weekly epoetin alfa to extended schedule epoetin or darbepoetin in chemotherapy-associated anemia. Am J Hematol 2015; 90:877-81. [PMID: 26149465 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2015] [Revised: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 07/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) epoetin alfa (EA) and darbepoetin alfa (DA) increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels and reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements in patients with cancer chemotherapy-associated anemia (CAA). Extended-interval ESA dosing (administration less than once weekly) is common with DA, but previous studies suggested that EA might also be administered less often than weekly. In this multicenter prospective trial, 239 CAA patients with Hb <10.5 g/dL were randomized to receive EA 40,000 U subcutaneously once weekly ("40K" arm), EA 80,000 U every 3 weeks ("80K"), EA 120,000 U every 3 weeks ("120K" arm), or DA 500 mcg every 3 weeks ("DA"), for 15 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving Hb ≥ 11.5 g/dL or increment of Hb > 2.0 g/dL from baseline without transfusion. Secondary endpoints included transfusion requirements, adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). There were no significant differences between treatment arms in the proportion of patients achieving Hb response (68.9% for 40K, 61.7% for 80K, 65.5% for 120K, and 66.7% for DA; P > 0.41 for all comparisons) or requiring RBC transfusion, but the median Hb increment from baseline was higher in the 40K and DA arms compared to the two extended dosing EA arms, and Hb response was achieved soonest in the weekly EA arm. There were no differences in PROs or AEs. The FDA-approved schedules tested-weekly EA 40,000 U, and every 3 week DA 500 mcg-are reasonable standards for CAA therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P. Steensma
- Department of Medical Oncology; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Boston Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jeff A. Sloan
- Cancer Center Statistics, Mayo Clinic; Rochester Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Allegra CJ, Yothers G, O'Connell MJ, Beart RW, Wozniak TF, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori G, Eakle JF, Robertson JM, Moore DF, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Sharif S, Roh MS, Wolmark N. Neoadjuvant 5-FU or Capecitabine Plus Radiation With or Without Oxaliplatin in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107:djv248. [PMID: 26374429 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 08/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project R-04 was designed to determine whether the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine could be substituted for continuous infusion 5-FU in the curative setting of stage II/III rectal cancer during neoadjuvant radiation therapy and whether the addition of oxaliplatin could further enhance the activity of fluoropyrimidine-sensitized radiation. METHODS Patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer undergoing preoperative radiation were randomly assigned to one of four chemotherapy regimens in a 2x2 design: CVI 5-FU or oral capecitabine with or without oxaliplatin. The primary endpoint was local-regional tumor control. Time-to-event endpoint distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazard models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Among 1608 randomized patients there were no statistically significant differences between regimens using 5-FU vs capecitabine in three-year local-regional tumor event rates (11.2% vs 11.8%), 5-year DFS (66.4% vs 67.7%), or 5-year OS (79.9% vs 80.8%); or for oxaliplatin vs no oxaliplatin for the three endpoints of local-regional events, DFS, and OS (11.2% vs 12.1%, 69.2% vs 64.2%, and 81.3% vs 79.0%). The addition of oxaliplatin was associated with statistically significantly more overall and grade 3-4 diarrhea (P < .0001). Three-year rates of local-regional recurrence among patients who underwent R0 resection ranged from 3.1 to 5.1% depending on the study arm. CONCLUSIONS Continuous infusion 5-FU produced outcomes for local-regional control, DFS, and OS similar to those obtained with oral capecitabine combined with radiation. This study establishes capecitabine as a standard of care in the pre-operative rectal setting. Oxaliplatin did not improve the local-regional failure rate, DFS, or OS for any patient risk group but did add considerable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen J Allegra
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW).
| | - Greg Yothers
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Michael J O'Connell
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Robert W Beart
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Timothy F Wozniak
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Henry C Pitot
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Anthony F Shields
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Jerome C Landry
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - David P Ryan
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Amit Arora
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Lisa S Evans
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Nathan Bahary
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Gamini Soori
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Janice F Eakle
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - John M Robertson
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Dennis F Moore
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Michael R Mullane
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Benjamin T Marchello
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Patrick J Ward
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Saima Sharif
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Mark S Roh
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| | - Norman Wolmark
- NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rapp SR, Case LD, Peiffer A, Naughton MM, Chan MD, Stieber VW, Moore DF, Falchuk SC, Piephoff JV, Edenfield WJ, Giguere JK, Loghin ME, Shaw EG. Donepezil for Irradiated Brain Tumor Survivors: A Phase III Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:1653-9. [PMID: 25897156 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.58.4508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Neurotoxic effects of brain irradiation include cognitive impairment in 50% to 90% of patients. Prior studies have suggested that donepezil, a neurotransmitter modulator, may improve cognitive function. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 198 adult brain tumor survivors ≥ 6 months after partial- or whole-brain irradiation were randomly assigned to receive a single daily dose (5 mg for 6 weeks, 10 mg for 18 weeks) of donepezil or placebo. A cognitive test battery assessing memory, attention, language, visuomotor, verbal fluency, and executive functions was administered before random assignment and at 12 and 24 weeks. A cognitive composite score (primary outcome) and individual cognitive domains were evaluated. RESULTS Of this mostly middle-age, married, non-Hispanic white sample, 66% had primary brain tumors, 27% had brain metastases, and 8% underwent prophylactic cranial irradiation. After 24 weeks of treatment, the composite scores did not differ significantly between groups (P = .48); however, significant differences favoring donepezil were observed for memory (recognition, P = .027; discrimination, P = .007) and motor speed and dexterity (P = .016). Significant interactions between pretreatment cognitive function and treatment were found for cognitive composite (P = .01), immediate recall (P = .05), delayed recall (P = .004), attention (P = .01), visuomotor skills (P = .02), and motor speed and dexterity (P < .001), with the benefits of donepezil greater for those who were more cognitively impaired before study treatment. CONCLUSION Treatment with donepezil did not significantly improve the overall composite score, but it did result in modest improvements in several cognitive functions, especially among patients with greater pretreatment impairments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R Rapp
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - L Doug Case
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ann Peiffer
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michelle M Naughton
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael D Chan
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Volker W Stieber
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dennis F Moore
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven C Falchuk
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - James V Piephoff
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - William J Edenfield
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey K Giguere
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Monica E Loghin
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Edward G Shaw
- Stephen R. Rapp, L. Doug Case, Ann Peiffer, Michelle M. Naughton, Michael D. Chan, and Edward G. Shaw, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Wake Forest Community Clinical Oncology Program Research Base; Volker W. Stieber, Novant Health System, Winston-Salem, NC; Dennis F. Moore Jr, Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; Steven C. Falchuk, Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, DE; James V. Piephoff, Mercy Hospital, St Louis, MO; William J. Edenfield and Jeffrey K. Giguere, Cancer Center of Carolinas, Greenville, SC; and Monica E. Loghin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lucas DM, Ruppert AS, Lozanski G, Dewald GW, Lozanski A, Claus R, Plass C, Flinn IW, Neuberg DS, Paietta EM, Bennett JM, Jelinek DF, Gribben JG, Hussein MA, Appelbaum FR, Larson RA, Moore DF, Tallman MS, Byrd JC, Grever MR. Cytogenetic prioritization with inclusion of molecular markers predicts outcome in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with fludarabine or fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide: a long-term follow-up study of the US intergroup phase III trial E2997. Leuk Lymphoma 2015; 56:3031-7. [PMID: 25721902 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1023800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Fludarabine (F) and cyclophosphamide (C) remain backbones of up-front chemotherapy regimens for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We report long-term follow-up of a randomized F vs. FC trial in untreated CLL (#) . With median follow-up of 88 months, estimated median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.3 vs. 48.1 months for F (n = 109) and FC (n = 118), respectively (p < 0.0001), and median overall survival (OS) was 88.0 vs. 79.1 months (p = 0.96). In multivariable analyses, variables associated with inferior PFS and OS respectively were age (p = 0.002, p < 0.001), Rai stage (p = 0.006, p = 0.02) and sex (p = 0.03, PFS only). Del(17)(p13.1) predicted shorter PFS and OS (p < 0.0001 for each), as did del(11q)(22.3) (p < 0.0001, p = 0.005, respectively), trisomy 12 with mutated Notch1 (p = 0.003, p = 0.03, respectively) and unmutated IGHV (p = 0.009, p = 0.002, respectively), all relative to patients without these features. These data confirm results from shorter follow-up and further justify targeted therapies for CLL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Lucas
- a Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Amy S Ruppert
- a Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Gerard Lozanski
- a Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| | | | - Arletta Lozanski
- a Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Rainer Claus
- c University of Freiburg Medical Center , Freiburg , Germany.,d German Cancer Research Center , Heidelberg , Germany
| | | | - Ian W Flinn
- e Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology , Nashville , TN , USA
| | | | | | | | | | - John G Gribben
- i Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London , London , UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John C Byrd
- a Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Michael R Grever
- a Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Blumenthal DT, Rankin C, Stelzer KJ, Spence AM, Sloan AE, Moore DF, Padula GDA, Schulman SB, Wade ML, Rushing EJ. A Phase III study of radiation therapy (RT) and O⁶-benzylguanine + BCNU versus RT and BCNU alone and methylation status in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and gliosarcoma: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study S0001. Int J Clin Oncol 2014; 20:650-8. [PMID: 25407559 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-014-0769-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2014] [Accepted: 10/20/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To determine the efficacy of methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) depletion + BCNU [1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1- nitrosourea: carmustine] therapy and the impact of methylation status in adults with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and gliosarcoma. METHODS Methylation analysis was performed on GBM patients with adequate tissue samples. Patients with newly diagnosed GBM or gliosarcoma were eligible for this Phase III open-label clinical trial. At registration, patients were randomized to Arm 1, which consisted of therapy with O(6)-benzylguanine (O(6)-BG) + BCNU 40 mg/m(2) (reduced dose) + radiation therapy (RT) (O6BG + BCNU arm), or Arm 2, which consisted of therapy with BCNU 200 mg/m(2) + RT (BCNU arm). RESULTS A total of 183 patients with newly diagnosed GBM or gliosarcoma from 42 U.S. institutions were enrolled in this study. Of these, 90 eligible patients received O(6)-BG + BCNU + RT and 89 received BCNU + RT. The trial was halted at the first interim analysis in accordance with the guidelines for stopping the study due to futility (<40 % improvement among patients on the O6BG + BCNU arm). Following adjustment for stratification factors, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups (one sided p = 0.94 and p = 0.88, respectively). Median OS was 11 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 8-13] months for patients in the O6BG + BCNU arm and 10 (95 % CI 8-12) months for those in the BCNU arm. PFS was 4 months for patients in each arm. Adverse events were reported in both arms, with significantly more grade 4 and 5 events in the experimental arm. CONCLUSIONS The addition of O(6)-BG to the standard regimen of radiation and BCNU for the treatment patients with newly diagnosed GBM and gliosarcoma did not provide added benefit and in fact caused additional toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah T Blumenthal
- Neuro-oncology Service, Department of Oncology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center-Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
O'Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Beart RW, Petrelli NJ, Allegra CJ, Sharif S, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Parda DS, Mohiuddin M, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori GS, Eakle J, Robertson JM, Moore DF, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Wozniak TF, Roh MS, Yothers G, Wolmark N. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1927-34. [PMID: 24799484 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.7753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 300] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal chemotherapy regimen administered concurrently with preoperative radiation therapy (RT) for patients with rectal cancer is unknown. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04 compared four chemotherapy regimens administered concomitantly with RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer who were undergoing preoperative RT (45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks plus a boost of 5.4 Gy to 10.8 Gy in three to six daily fractions) were randomly assigned to one of the following chemotherapy regimens: continuous intravenous infusional fluorouracil (CVI FU; 225 mg/m(2), 5 days per week), with or without intravenous oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) once per week for 5 weeks) or oral capecitabine (825 mg/m(2) twice per day, 5 days per week), with or without oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) once per week for 5 weeks). Before random assignment, the surgeon indicated whether the patient was eligible for sphincter-sparing surgery based on clinical staging. The surgical end points were complete pathologic response (pCR), sphincter-sparing surgery, and surgical downstaging (conversion to sphincter-sparing surgery). RESULTS From September 2004 to August 2010, 1,608 patients were randomly assigned. No significant differences in the rates of pCR, sphincter-sparing surgery, or surgical downstaging were identified between the CVI FU and capecitabine regimens or between the two regimens with or without oxaliplatin. Patients treated with oxaliplatin experienced significantly more grade 3 or 4 diarrhea (P < .001). CONCLUSION Administering capecitabine with preoperative RT achieved similar rates of pCR, sphincter-sparing surgery, and surgical downstaging compared with CVI FU. Adding oxaliplatin did not improve surgical outcomes but added significant toxicity. The definitive analysis of local tumor control, disease-free survival, and overall survival will be performed when the protocol-specified number of events has occurred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J O'Connell
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Linda H Colangelo
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Robert W Beart
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Nicholas J Petrelli
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Carmen J Allegra
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Saima Sharif
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Henry C Pitot
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Anthony F Shields
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Jerome C Landry
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - David P Ryan
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - David S Parda
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Mohammed Mohiuddin
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Amit Arora
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Lisa S Evans
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Nathan Bahary
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Gamini S Soori
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Janice Eakle
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - John M Robertson
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Dennis F Moore
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Michael R Mullane
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Benjamin T Marchello
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Patrick J Ward
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Timothy F Wozniak
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Mark S Roh
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Greg Yothers
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| | - Norman Wolmark
- Michael J. O'Connell, Linda H. Colangelo, Robert W. Beart, Nicholas J. Petrelli, Carmen J. Allegra, Saima Sharif, Henry C. Pitot, Anthony F. Shields, David S. Parda, Mohammed Mohiuddin, Amit Arora, Lisa S. Evans, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S. Soori, Janice Eakle, John M. Robertson, Dennis F. Moore Jr, Michael R. Mullane, Benjamin T. Marchello, Patrick J. Ward, Timothy F. Wozniak, Mark S. Roh, Greg Yothers, Norman Wolmark, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations and Biostatistical Centers; David S. Parda, Norman Wolmark, Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital; Nathan Bahary, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Robert W. Beart, Colorectal Surgery Institute, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale; Amit Arora, Kaiser Permanente Hayward, Hayward, CA; Nicholas J. Petrelli, Timothy F. Wozniak, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center at Christiana Care Health Service, Newark, DE; Carmen J. Allegra, University of Florida, Gainesville; Janice Eakle, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota; Mark S. Roh, MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando Health, Orlando, FL; Henry C. Pitot, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Anthony F. Shields, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group, Detroit; John M. Robertson, Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI; Jerome C. Landry, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA; David P. Ryan, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lisa S. Evans, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Southeast CCC Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Gamini S. Soori, Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium Community Clinical Oncology Program, Omaha, NE; Dennis Moore Jr, Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita/St Francis Regional Medical Center/Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Wichita, KS; Michael R. Mullane, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program John H. Stroger Jr Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abou-Jaoude D, Moore JA, Moore MB, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Ablah E, Moore DF, Moore DF. Glioblastoma and increased survival with longer chemotherapy duration. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e13006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e13006 Background: The 5-year survival for patients (pts) with glioblastoma (GBM) is low at approximately 3%. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) remain the standard of care. The optimal duration of therapy with TMZ is unknown, though treatment periods of 6 months (mo), 12 mo and longer have been utilized. Whether or not there is a benefit with longer treatment duration is controversial. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all pts diagnosed with GBM who were treated at a regional referral center was conducted with data obtained from their electronic medical records. These pts were treated with TMZ for up to 2 years between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011. Survival was calculated as the time from initial surgical diagnosis until death. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) as well as the overall survival (OS) distribution of pts after treatment. The results were compared to historical controls and data from previous clinical trials of pts treated up to 1 year. Results: Data from 56 pts were evaluated, the majority of whom had gross total resection and had external pathology review confirming the diagnosis of GBM. The OS probability was 55.4% (SE = 0.068) at 1 year, 26.9% (SE = 0.067) at 2 years and 20.1% (SE = 0.065) at 3 years. The median PFS time in this study group was 8 mo (95% CI = 4.0 – 9.0 mo). The probability of no progression at 2 years was 8.6% (SE = 0.05). Seven pts (12.5%) were treated with TMZ for 2 years. The probability of disease progression at 2 years among these pts was 33.3% with a median time-to-progression of 20 mo (95% CI = 5.0-28.0). These patients showed an increased survival probability at 3 years compared to pts who did not receive the 2 year treatment of TMZ (log-rank test Chi-square = 12.4, p = 0.0004). Conclusions: This analysis suggests that there may be an advantage for a longer duration of TMZ therapy in pts with GBM. In this review, treatment with TMZ for 2 years was associated with an increased survival benefit. While we consider the sample size to be too small for generalization, a prospective/multicenter study with a larger sample size might better evaluate the question of duration of TMZ therapy, particularly if both clinical and basic science data are paired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph A Moore
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | | | | | - Elizabeth Ablah
- University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rippy MA, Franks PJS, Feddersen F, Guza RT, Moore DF. Physical dynamics controlling variability in nearshore fecal pollution: fecal indicator bacteria as passive particles. Mar Pollut Bull 2013; 66:151-157. [PMID: 23174305 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2012] [Revised: 09/19/2012] [Accepted: 09/23/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
We present results from a 5-h field program (HB06) that took place at California's Huntington State Beach. We assessed the importance of physical dynamics in controlling fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations during HB06 using an individual based model including alongshore advection and cross-shore variable horizontal diffusion. The model was parameterized with physical (waves and currents) and bacterial (Escherichia coli and Enterococcus) observations made during HB06. The model captured surfzone FIB dynamics well (average surfzone model skill: 0.84 {E. coli} and 0.52 {Enterococcus}), but fell short of capturing offshore FIB dynamics. Our analyses support the hypothesis that surfzone FIB variability during HB06 was a consequence of southward advection and diffusion of a patch of FIB originating north of the study area. Offshore FIB may have originated from a different, southern, source. Mortality may account for some of the offshore variability not explained by the physical model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Rippy
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0218, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jatoi A, Nieva JJ, Qin R, Loprinzi CL, Wos EJ, Novotny PJ, Moore DF, Mowat RB, Bechar N, Pajon ER, Hartmann LC. A pilot study of long-acting octreotide for symptomatic malignant ascites. Oncology 2012; 82:315-20. [PMID: 22572824 DOI: 10.1159/000337246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2012] [Accepted: 02/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective, non-invasive, palliative strategies for symptomatic malignant ascites are unavailable. This trial explored whether octreotide, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor, a putative mediator of ascites, prolongs the interval to next paracentesis. METHODS After a baseline paracentesis and a test of short-acting agent, patients with symptomatic ascites were randomly assigned to long-acting octreotide (Sandostatin LAR®) depot 30 mg intramuscularly every month versus 0.9% sodium chloride administered similarly. Patients were then monitored for recurrent, symptomatic ascites. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were enrolled: 16 assigned to the octreotide and 17 to the control arm. The median time to next paracentesis was 28 and 14 days in the octreotide and placebo arm, respectively (p = 0.17). After adjustment for extracted ascites volume and abdominal girth change, no statistically significant difference between the groups was observed (hazard ratio = 0.52, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.21-1.28; p = 0.15, per Cox model). Octreotide-treated patients described less of abdominal bloating (p = 0.01), abdominal discomfort (p = 0.02), and shortness of breath (p = 0.007) at one month, although other quality of life symptoms were comparable between the arms. Long-acting octreotide was reasonably well tolerated. CONCLUSION As prescribed in this trial, octreotide did not seem effective in prolonging the time to next paracentesis, although improvements in symptoms suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition merits further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aminah Jatoi
- Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Loprinzi CL, Balcueva EP, Liu H, Sloan JA, Kottschade LA, Stella PJ, Carlson MD, Moore DF, Zon RT, Levitt R, Jaslowski AJ. A phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pilocarpine for vaginal dryness: North Central Cancer Treatment group study N04CA. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 9:105-12. [PMID: 21702402 DOI: 10.1016/j.suponc.2011.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Vaginal dryness is a common problem for which effective and safe nonestrogenic treatments are needed. Based on preliminary promising data that pilocarpine attenuated vaginal dryness, the current trial was conducted. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial design was used to compare pilocarpine, at target doses of 5 mg twice daily and 5 mg four times daily, with a placebo. Vaginal dryness was recorded by patient-completed questionnaires at baseline and weekly for 6 weeks after study initiation. The primary endpoint for this study was the area under the curve summary statistic composed of the longitudinal responses obtained at baseline and through the 6 weeks of treatment to a numerical analogue scale asking patients to rate their perceived amount of vaginal dryness. The primary analysis was carried out by a single t test using a two-side alternative to compare the collective pilocarpine treatment arms with the collective placebo arms. A total of 201 patients enrolled in this trial. The primary analysis, comparing vaginal dryness symptoms in the collective pilocarpine arms against the placebo arm, did not reveal any benefit for the pilocarpine treatment. This finding was confirmed by other secondary analyses. Toxicity evaluation revealed more nausea, sweating, rigors, and urinary frequency with the pilocarpine arms compared with the placebo arm.
Collapse
|
23
|
Barton DL, Atherton PJ, Bauer BA, Moore DF, Mattar BI, Lavasseur BI, Rowland KM, Zon RT, Lelindqwister NA, Nagargoje GG, Morgenthaler TI, Sloan JA, Loprinzi CL. The use of Valeriana officinalis (Valerian) in improving sleep in patients who are undergoing treatment for cancer: a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study (NCCTG Trial, N01C5). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 9:24-31. [PMID: 21399726 DOI: 10.1016/j.suponc.2010.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Sleep disorders are a substantial problem for cancer survivors, with prevalence estimates ranging from 23% to 61%. Although numerous prescription hypnotics are available, few are approved for long-term use or have demonstrated benefit in this circumstance. Hypnotics may have unwanted side effects and are costly, and cancer survivors often wish to avoid prescription drugs. New options with limited side effects are needed. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a Valerian officinalis supplement for sleep in people with cancer who were undergoing cancer treatment. Participants were randomized to receive 450 mg of valerian-or placebo orally 1 hour before bedtime for 8 weeks. The primary end point was area under the curve (AUC) of the overall Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Secondary outcomes included the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Toxicity was evaluated with both self-reported numeric analogue scale questions and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. Questionnaires were completed at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks. A total of 227 patients were randomized into this study between March 19, 2004, and March 9, 2007, with 119 being evaluable for the primary end point. The AUC over the 8 weeks for valerian was 51.4 (SD = 16), while that for placebo was 49.7 (SD = 15), with a P value of 0.6957. A supplemental, exploratory analysis revealed that several fatigue end points, as measured by the BFI and POMS, were significantly better for those taking valerian over placebo. Participants also reported less trouble with sleep and less drowsiness on valerian than placebo. There were no significant differences in toxicities as measured by self-report or the CTCAE except for mild alkaline phosphatase increases, which were slightly more common in the placebo group. This study failed to provide data to support the hypothesis that valerian, 450 mg, at bedtime could improve sleep as measured by the PSQI. However, exploratory analyses revealed improvement in some secondary outcomes, such as fatigue. Further research with valerian exploring physiologic effects in oncology symptom management may be warranted.
Collapse
|
24
|
Roberts CB, Jang TL, Shao YH, Kabadi S, Moore DF, Lu-Yao GL. Treatment profile and complications associated with cryotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a population-based study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2011; 14:313-9. [PMID: 21519347 PMCID: PMC3151329 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2011.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the treatment patterns and 3-12-month complication rates associated with receiving prostate cryotherapy in a population-based study. Men >65 years diagnosed with incident localized prostate cancer in Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked database from 2004 to 2005 were identified. A total of 21,344 men were included in the study, of which 380 were treated initially with cryotherapy. Recipients of cryotherapy versus aggressive forms of prostate therapy (ie, radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy) were more likely to be older, have one co-morbidity, low income, live in the South and be diagnosed with indolent cancer. Complication rates increased from 3 to 12 months following cryotherapy. By the twelfth month, the rates for urinary incontinence, lower urinary tract obstruction, erectile dysfunction and bowel bleeding reached 9.8, 28.7, 20.1 and 3.3%, respectively. Diagnoses of hydronephrosis, urinary fistula or bowel fistula were not evident. The rates of corrective invasive procedures for lower urinary tract obstruction and erectile dysfunction were both <2.9% by the twelfth month. Overall, complications post-cryotherapy were modest; however, diagnoses for lower urinary tract obstruction and erectile dysfunction were common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C B Roberts
- State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Weroha SJ, Oberg AL, Ziegler KLA, Dakhilm SR, Rowland KM, Hartmann LC, Moore DF, Keeney GL, Peethambaram PP, Haluska P. Phase II trial of lapatinib and topotecan (LapTop) in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 122:116-20. [PMID: 21514634 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2011] [Revised: 03/26/2011] [Accepted: 03/29/2011] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Resistance to chemotherapy is a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian/peritoneal cancer. One purported mechanism of topotecan resistance is the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (Pgp). We designed a phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and adverse event profile of concomitant topotecan and lapatinib, a small molecule pan-erbB inhibitor that can block BCRP/Pgp efflux of topotecan. METHODS Patients with platinum-refractory or resistant epithelial ovarian/peritoneal cancer were treated with topotecan 3.2 mg/m² IV on Day 1, 8 and 15 and lapatinib 1250 mg PO daily, continuously in 28 day cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate. For correlative studies, archived tissue was assessed for expression of EGFR, HER2, HIF-1α, CD31, and BCRP. RESULTS Eighteen patients were enrolled and treated. Four experienced evidence of clinical benefit: one partial response and three with stable disease. Using a two-stage Simon design, the trial was stopped after the first stage due to insufficient activity. Grades 3+ and 4+ adverse events (AE) were experienced in 14 and 4 patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 AE were neutropenia (56%), thrombocytopenia (28%), and diarrhea (22%). CONCLUSIONS The combination of lapatinib plus topotecan for the treatment of platinum refractory/resistant epithelial ovarian cancer lacks sufficient activity to warrant further investigation. In particular, hematologic adverse events were substantial. Expression of correlative study markers did not reveal patterns of predicted benefit or toxicity. Disruption of erbB signaling and BCRP/Pgp efflux with lapatinib was insufficient for overcoming topotecan resistance, suggesting alternative mechanisms of resistance are involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S John Weroha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zonder JA, Crowley J, Hussein MA, Bolejack V, Moore DF, Whittenberger BF, Abidi MH, Durie BGM, Barlogie B. Lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for multiple myeloma: a randomized Southwest Oncology Group trial (S0232). Blood 2010; 116:5838-41. [PMID: 20876454 PMCID: PMC3031379 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-303487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2010] [Accepted: 09/15/2010] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Southwest Oncology Group conducted a randomized trial comparing lenalidomide (LEN) plus dexamethasone (DEX; n = 97) to placebo (PLC) plus DEX (n = 95) in newly diagnosed myeloma. Three 35-day induction cycles applied DEX 40 mg/day on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 together with LEN 25 mg/day for 28 days or PLC. Monthly maintenance used DEX 40 mg/day on days 1 to 4 and 15 to 18 along with LEN 25 mg/day for 21 days or PLC. Crossover from PLC-DEX to LEN-DEX was encouraged on progression. One-year progression-free survival, overall response rate, and very good partial response rate were superior with LEN-DEX (78% vs 52%, P = .002; 78% vs 48%, P < .001; 63% vs 16%, P < .001), whereas 1-year overall survival was similar (94% vs 88%; P = .25). Toxicities were more pronounced with LEN-DEX (neutropenia grade 3 or 4: 21% vs 5%, P < .001; thromboembolic events despite aspirin prophylaxis: 23.5% [initial LEN-DEX or crossover] vs 5%; P < .001). This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00064038.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Zonder
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Purnell JQ, Palesh OG, Heckler CE, Adams MJ, Chin N, Mohile S, Peppone LJ, Atkins JN, Moore DF, Spiegel D, Messing E, Morrow GR. Racial disparities in traumatic stress in prostate cancer patients: secondary analysis of a National URCC CCOP Study of 317 men. Support Care Cancer 2010; 19:899-907. [PMID: 20414685 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0880-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2009] [Accepted: 04/08/2010] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION African American men have the highest rates of prostate cancer of any racial group, but very little is known about the psychological functioning of African American men in response to prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. PURPOSE In this secondary analysis of a national trial testing a psychological intervention for prostate cancer patients, we report on the traumatic stress symptoms of African American and non-African American men. METHODS This analysis includes 317 men (African American: n = 30, 9%; non-African American: n = 287, 91%) who were enrolled in the intervention trial, which included 12 weeks of group psychotherapy and 24 months of follow-up. Using mixed model analysis, total score on the Impact of Events Scale (IES) and its Intrusion and Avoidance subscales were examined to determine mean differences in traumatic stress across all time points (0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months). In an additional analysis, relevant psychosocial, demographic, and clinical variables were added to the model. RESULTS Results showed significantly higher levels of traumatic stress for African American men compared to non-African American men in all models independently of the intervention arm, demographics, and relevant clinical variables. African Americans also had a consistently higher prevalence of clinically significant traumatic stress symptoms (defined as IES total score ≥ 27). These elevations remained across all time points over 24 months. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to show a racial disparity in traumatic stress specifically as an aspect of overall psychological adjustment to prostate cancer. Recommendations are made for appropriate assessment, referral, and treatment of psychological distress in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Q Purnell
- Washington University in St. Louis, Health Communication Research Laboratory, 700 Rosedale Ave., Campus Box 1009, St. Louis, MO 63112, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Horn L, Dahlberg SE, Sandler AB, Dowlati A, Moore DF, Murren JR, Schiller JH. Phase II study of cisplatin plus etoposide and bevacizumab for previously untreated, extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3501. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:6006-11. [PMID: 19826110 PMCID: PMC2793043 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.23.7545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2009] [Accepted: 06/26/2009] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus cisplatin and etoposide in patients with extensive-stage disease, small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS In this phase II trial, 63 patients were treated with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg plus cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) and etoposide 120 mg/m(2), which was followed by bevacizumab alone until death or disease progression occurred. The primary end point was the proportion of patients alive at 6 months without disease progression (ie, progression-free survival [PFS]). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and toxicity. Correlative studies were performed to explore the relationship between baseline and changes in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble cell adhesion molecules (ie, vascular cell adhesion molecule [VCAM], intercellular cell adhesion molecule [ICAM], and E-selectin) and basic fibroblast growth factor and outcome. RESULTS The 6-month PFS was 30.2%, the median PFS was 4.7 months, and OS was 10.9 months. The response rate was 63.5%. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (57.8%). Only one patient had grade 3 pulmonary hemorrhage. Patients who had high baseline VCAM had a higher risk of progression or death compared with those who had low baseline VCAM levels. No relationships between outcome and any other biomarkers were seen. CONCLUSION The addition of bevacizumab to cisplatin and etoposide in patients with ED-SCLC results in improved PFS and OS relative to historical controls who received this chemotherapy regimen without bevacizumab. This regimen appears to be well tolerated and has minimal increase in toxicities compared with chemotherapy alone. Baseline VCAM levels predicted survival, but no other relationships among treatment, biomarkers, and outcome were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leora Horn
- From Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Practice, Wichita, KS; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Suzanne E. Dahlberg
- From Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Practice, Wichita, KS; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Alan B. Sandler
- From Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Practice, Wichita, KS; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Afshin Dowlati
- From Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Practice, Wichita, KS; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Dennis F. Moore
- From Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Practice, Wichita, KS; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - John R. Murren
- From Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Practice, Wichita, KS; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Joan H. Schiller
- From Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR; University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH; Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Practice, Wichita, KS; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yathindranath V, Hegmann T, van Lierop J, Potter K, Fowler CB, Moore DF. Simultaneous magnetically directed drug convection and MR imaging. Nanotechnology 2009; 20:405101. [PMID: 19738300 DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/40/405101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (IO NPs) are of interest for their usefulness in biomedical applications. In this work, we have synthesized iron oxide nanocomposites surface-modified with different biocompatible polymers. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was physisorbed onto these IO NPs along with an excipient during freeze-drying. The mass transport of the protein attached to the iron oxide core-shell nanoparticles (IO cs-NPs) under a gradient magnetic field of an MRI instrument was observed in vitro and in an egg as a model system for a biological fluid. From the in vitro experiments in agarose gels, it was observed that the protein gets separated from the core during mass transport for some cs-IO, but co-migration was observed for PEG-modified IO cs-NPs. These experiments demonstrated proof-of-concept for the use of IO cs-NPs in magnetically directed drug convection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Yathindranath
- Department of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T2N2, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
32
|
Le QTX, Moon J, Redman M, Williamson SK, Lara PN, Goldberg Z, Gaspar LE, Crowley JJ, Moore DF, Gandara DR. Phase II study of tirapazamine, cisplatin, and etoposide and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: SWOG 0222. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:3014-9. [PMID: 19364954 PMCID: PMC2702233 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.21.3868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2008] [Accepted: 01/13/2009] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A SWOG pilot study (S0004) showed that tirapazamine (TPZ) when combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy yielded a promising median survival of 22 months in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC). We report results of the phase II study designed to confirm this result. PATIENTS AND METHODS The concurrent phase consisted of two cycles of cisplatin, etoposide, and once-daily radiation to 61 Gy. TPZ was given at 260 mg/m(2) on days 1, 29, and at 160 mg/m(2) on days 8, 10, 12, 36, 38, and 40. Consolidation consisted of two cycles of cisplatin and etoposide. Complete responders received prophylactic cranial irradiation. Results were considered promising if the median survival time was at least 21 months and of no further interest if < or = 14 months. RESULTS S0222 was closed early due to a report of excess toxicity for TPZ in a head and neck cancer trial elsewhere. Of planned 85 patients, 69 were accrued. In 68 assessable patients, 17 (25%) had grade 3 to 4 esophagitis and eight (12%) had grade 3 febrile neutropenia during the concurrent phase. There were three possible treatment-related deaths, two in concurrent phase (one progressive disease not otherwise specified within 30 days, one pericardial effusion) and one in consolidation phase (esophageal hemorrhage). At a median follow-up of 35 months, median progression-free survival was 11 months (95% CI, 10 to 13 months) and median overall survival was 21 months (95% CI, 17 to 33 months). CONCLUSION S0222 showed acceptable levels of toxicity and similar promising median survival as S0004. Further study of hypoxia-targeted therapy is warranted in LSCLC.
Collapse
|
33
|
Galanis E, Jaeckle KA, Maurer MJ, Reid JM, Ames MM, Hardwick JS, Reilly JF, Loboda A, Nebozhyn M, Fantin VR, Richon VM, Scheithauer B, Giannini C, Flynn PJ, Moore DF, Zwiebel J, Buckner JC. Phase II trial of vorinostat in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a north central cancer treatment group study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:2052-8. [PMID: 19307505 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.19.0694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 256] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, represents a rational therapeutic target in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with recurrent GBM who had received one or fewer chemotherapy regimens for progressive disease were eligible. Vorinostat was administered at a dose of 200 mg orally twice a day for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period. RESULTS A total of 66 patients were treated. Grade 3 or worse nonhematologic toxicity occurred in 26% of patients and consisted mainly of fatigue (17%), dehydration (6%), and hypernatremia (5%); grade 3 or worse hematologic toxicity occurred in 26% of patients and consisted mainly of thrombocytopenia (22%). Pharmacokinetic analysis showed lower vorinostat maximum concentration and area under the curve (0 to 24 hours) values in patients treated with enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants, although this did not reach statistical significance. The trial met the prospectively defined primary efficacy end point, with nine of the first 52 patients being progression-free at 6 months. Median overall survival from study entry was 5.7 months (range, 0.7 to 28+ months). Immunohistochemical analysis performed in paired baseline and post-vorinostat treatment samples in a separate surgical subgroup of five patients with recurrent GBM showed post treatment increase in acetylation of histones H2B and H4 (four of five patients) and of histone H3 (three of five patients). Microarray RNA analysis in the same samples showed changes in genes regulated by vorinostat, such as upregulation of E-cadherin (P = .02). CONCLUSION Vorinostat monotherapy is well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM and has modest single-agent activity. Histone acetylation analysis and RNA expression profiling indicate that vorinostat in this dose and schedule affects target pathways in GBM. Additional testing of vorinostat in combination regimens is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evanthia Galanis
- Mayo Clinic, Gonda 10-141, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Witzig TE, Geyer SM, Kurtin PJ, Colgan JP, Inwards DJ, Micallef INM, LaPlant BR, Michalak JC, Salim M, Dalton RJ, Moore DF, Reeder CB. Salvage chemotherapy with rituximab DHAP for relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase II trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Leuk Lymphoma 2008; 49:1074-80. [PMID: 18569634 DOI: 10.1080/10428190801993470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to learn the toxicity and efficacy of adding 4 doses of rituximab to a standard platinum-based salvage regimen for relapsed CD20+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) days 1,8,15, 22 (cycle 1 only); cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) over 24 h on day 3, cytosine arabinoside 2 g/m(2) IV every 12 h x two doses on day 4, dexamethasone 40 mg PO/IV days 3-6, and G-CSF days 5-14. The ORR was 82% (47/57) with 33% (19/57) complete remissions and 49% (28/57) partial remissions. The duration of response (DR) for the 47 responders was 10.5 months (95% CI: 5.3-16.8). The median time to progression (TTP) was 10.3 months (95% CI: 5.3-14.0), the median event-free survival (EFS) was 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.9-11.0), and the median overall survival was 30.5 months (95% CI: 17.8-60.6). We conclude that rituximab can be safely added to standard DHAP.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ansell SM, Inwards DJ, Rowland KM, Flynn PJ, Morton RF, Moore DF, Kaufmann SH, Ghobrial I, Kurtin PJ, Maurer M, Allmer C, Witzig TE. Low-dose, single-agent temsirolimus for relapsed mantle cell lymphoma: a phase 2 trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Cancer 2008; 113:508-14. [PMID: 18543327 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to test a low dose of (25 mg weekly) of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor temsirolimus for patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). METHODS Patients with relapsed or refractory MCL were eligible to receive temsirolimus 25 mg intravenously every week as a single agent. Patients who had a tumor response after 6 cycles were eligible to continue drug for a total of 12 cycles or 2 cycles after complete remission and then were observed without maintenance. RESULTS Of 29 enrolled patients, 28 were evaluable for toxicity, and 27 were evaluable for efficacy. The median age was 69 years (range, 51-85 years), 86% of patients had stage IV disease, and 71% had > or = 2 extranodal sites. Patients had received a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-9 prior therapies), and 50% were refractory to the last treatment. The overall confirmed response rate was 41% (11 of 27 patients; 90% confidence interval [CI], 22%-61%) with 1 complete response (3.7%) and 10 partial responses (37%). The median time to progression in all eligible patients was 6 months (95% CI, 3-11 months), and the median duration of response for the 11 responders was 6 months (range, 1-26 months). Hematologic toxicities were the most common, with 50% (14 of 28 patients) grade 3 and 4% (1 of 28 patients) grade 4 toxicities observed. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent cause of dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS Single-agent temsirolimus at a dose of 25 mg weekly is an effective new agent for the treatment of MCL. The 25-mg dose level retained the antitumor activity of the 250-mg dose with less myelosuppression. Further studies of temsirolimus in combination with other active drugs for MCL and other lymphoid malignancies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M Ansell
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Morris SR, Knapp JS, Moore DF, Trees DL, Wang SA, Bolan G, Bauer HM. Using strain typing to characterise a fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission network in southern California. Sex Transm Infect 2008; 84:290-1. [DOI: 10.1136/sti.2008.030163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
37
|
El-Osta HE, Yammine YS, Chehab BM, Fields AS, Moore DF, Mattar BI. Unexplained Hemopericardium as a Presenting Feature of Primary Cardiac Angiosarcoma: A Case Report and a Review of the Diagnostic Dilemma. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3:800-2. [DOI: 10.1097/jto.0b013e31817c9282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
38
|
Abstract
AIMS The species identification and antimicrobial resistance profiles were determined for enterococci isolated from Southern California surface and ocean waters. METHODS AND RESULTS Species identification was determined for 1413 presumptive Enterococcus isolates from urban runoff, bay, ocean and sewage water samples. The most frequently isolated species were Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus hirae, Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus mundtii. All five of these species were isolated from ocean and bay water with a frequency ranging from 7% to 36%. Enterococcus casseliflavus was the most frequently isolated species in urban runoff making up 36-65% of isolates while E. faecium was the most frequently isolated species in sewage making up 53-78% of isolates. The similar distribution of species in urban runoff and receiving water suggests that urban runoff may be the source of Enterococcus. No vancomycin or high level gentamycin resistance was detected in E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates. CONCLUSIONS Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium, E. casseliflavus and E. mundtii are the most commonly isolated Enterococcus species from urban runoff and receiving waters in Southern California. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY Determination of the Enterococcus species isolated from receiving waters and potential pollution sources may assist in determining the sources of pollution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D F Moore
- Orange County Public Health Laboratory, Santa Ana, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Moore DF, Lix LM, Yogendran MS, Martens P, Tamayo A. Stroke surveillance in Manitoba, Canada: estimates from administrative databases. Chronic Dis Can 2008; 29:22-30. [PMID: 19036220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
This study investigated the use of population-based administrative databases for stroke surveillance. First, a meta-analysis was conducted of four studies, identified via a PubMed search, which estimated the sensitivity and specificity of hospital data for ascertaining cases of stroke when clinical registries or medical charts were the gold standard. Subsequently, case-ascertainment algorithms based on hospital, physician and prescription drug records were developed and applied to Manitoba's administrative data, and prevalence estimates were obtained for fiscal years 1995/96 to 2003/04 by age group, sex, region of residence and income quintile. The meta-analysis results revealed some over-ascertainment of stroke cases from hospital data when the algorithm was based on diagnosis codes for any type of cerebrovascular disease (Mantel-Haenszel Odds-Ratio [OR] - 1.70 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.53 - 1.88]). Analyses of Manitoba administrative data revealed that while the total number of stroke cases varied substantially across the algorithms, the trend in prevalence was stable regardless of the algorithm adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D F Moore
- Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Johnson EA, Marks RS, Mandrekar SJ, Hillman SL, Hauge MD, Bauman MD, Wos EJ, Moore DF, Kugler JW, Windschitl HE, Graham DL, Bernath AM, Fitch TR, Soori GS, Jett JR, Adjei AA, Perez EA. Phase III randomized, double-blind study of maintenance CAI or placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after completion of initial therapy (NCCTG 97-24-51). Lung Cancer 2007; 60:200-7. [PMID: 18045731 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2007] [Revised: 09/15/2007] [Accepted: 10/04/2007] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assessed whether maintenance therapy with carboxyaminoimidazole (CAI), compared to placebo, prolonged overall survival in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients who had tumour regression or stable disease after treatment with one chemotherapy regimen. METHODS After completion of chemotherapy, patients were randomized to receive daily oral CAI at 250mg or placebo. Treatment continued until patient refusal, disease progression or unacceptable adverse event (AE). Quality of life (QOL) was assessed by UNISCALE and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung Cancer (FACT-L). RESULTS Registration was halted early for slow accrual (targeted 360, randomized 186: 94 CAI, 92 placebo). All patients were off active treatment at time of analyses. Non-haematologic AEs (primarily grade 1, 2) observed significantly more often in the CAI group included fatigue (54.5% versus 29.3%), anorexia (31.1% versus 13.0%), nausea (62.2% versus 30.4%), vomiting (32.2% versus 14.1%), neurosensory (60.0% versus 44.6%) and ataxia (33.3% versus 16.3%). Patients discontinued treatment for AEs, death on study or refusal more often in the CAI group (36.0% versus 8.7%, p<0.0001). No significant differences in survival or time to progression were observed (median: CAI versus placebo: 11.4 months versus 10.5 months, log rank p=0.54; 2.8 months versus 2.4 months, log rank p=0.50). More patients receiving CAI reported a clinically significant (10-point) decline in QOL particularly on the functional (58% versus 37%, p=0.05) construct of FACT-L and UNISCALE (72% versus 51%, p=0.04). CONCLUSION The addition of CAI following chemotherapy does not provide clinical benefit or improvement in QOL over placebo in advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
|
41
|
Haddock MG, Swaminathan R, Foster NR, Hauge MD, Martenson JA, Camoriano JK, Stella PJ, Tenglin RC, Schaefer PL, Moore DF, Alberts SR. Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase II Study N9942. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:2567-72. [PMID: 17577035 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.10.2111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy with concomitant gemcitabine and cisplatin for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-eight patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma received gemcitabine (30 mg/m2) and cisplatin (10 mg/m2) twice weekly during the first 3 weeks of radiotherapy. The radiation dose to the primary tumor and regional nodes was 45 Gy in 25 fractions, and the gross tumor volume received an additional 5.4 Gy in three fractions. Four weeks after radiotherapy, patients received gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) once weekly every 3 of 4 weeks for a 12-week period. The primary end point was survival at 12 months. Secondary end points were time to progression, toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS Survival at 1 year was 40% for 47 eligible patients. The median survival was 10.2 months. Confirmed responses were observed for 8.5% (two partial, two complete), and median time to progression was 7.3 months. Grade 4 or higher toxicity was observed for 31% and consisted primarily of hematologic and GI toxicity. There was a trend toward improved overall quality of life, measured by the Symptom Distress Scale (P = .06), with significant improvements in domains of insomnia, pain, and outlook. CONCLUSION The combination of radiotherapy, gemcitabine, and cisplatin was well tolerated. Survival results were similar to those achieved with other treatment regimens for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer but did not meet our predefined criteria for additional evaluation of this regimen.
Collapse
|
42
|
Garces YI, Okuno SH, Schild SE, Mandrekar SJ, Bot BM, Martens JM, Wender DB, Soori GS, Moore DF, Kozelsky TF, Jett JR. Phase I North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial-N9923 of escalating doses of twice-daily thoracic radiation therapy with amifostine and with alternating chemotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67:995-1001. [PMID: 17336213 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2006] [Revised: 10/02/2006] [Accepted: 10/03/2006] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary goal was to identify the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) that can be given with chemotherapy and amifostine for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Treatment began with two cycles of topotecan (1 mg/m(2)) Days 1 to 5 and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) Day 5 (every 3 weeks) given before and after TRT. The TRT began at 6 weeks. The TRT was given in 120 cGy fractions b.i.d. and the dose escalation (from 4,800 cGy, dose level 1, to 6,600 cGy, dose level 4) followed the standard "cohorts of 3" design. The etoposide (E) (50 mg/day) and cisplatin (C) (3 mg/m(2)) were given i.v. before the morning TRT and amifostine (500 mg/day) was given before the afternoon RT. This was followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as Grade > or =4 hematologic, febrile neutropenia, esophagitis, or other nonhematologic toxicity, Grade > or =3 dyspnea, or Grade > or =2 pneumonitis. RESULTS Fifteen patients were evaluable for the Phase I portion of the trial. No DLTs were seen at dose levels 1 and 2. Two patients on dose level 4 experienced DLTs: 1 patient had a Grade 4 pneumonitis, dyspnea, fatigue, hypokalemia, and anorexia, and 1 patient had a Grade 5 hypoxia attributable to TRT. One of 6 patients on dose level 3 had a DLT, Grade 3 esophagitis. The Grade > or =3 toxicities seen in at least 10% of patients during TRT were esophagitis (53%), leukopenia (33%), dehydration (20%), neutropenia (13%), and fatigue (13%). The median survival was 14.5 months. CONCLUSION The MTD of b.i.d. TRT was 6000 cGy (120 cGy b.i.d.) with EP and amifostine.
Collapse
|
43
|
Flinn IW, Neuberg DS, Grever MR, Dewald GW, Bennett JM, Paietta EM, Hussein MA, Appelbaum FR, Larson RA, Moore DF, Tallman MS. Phase III trial of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide compared with fludarabine for patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: US Intergroup Trial E2997. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:793-8. [PMID: 17283364 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.08.0762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 336] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is an effective regimen for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, it may be accompanied by increased toxicity compared with fludarabine alone. E2997 is a phase III randomized Intergroup trial comparing fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC arm) versus fludarabine (F arm) alone in patients receiving their first chemotherapy regimen for CLL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Symptomatic, previously untreated patients with CLL were randomly assigned to receive either fludarabine 25 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 through 5 or cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV day 1 and fludarabine 20 mg/m2 IV days 1 through 5. These cycles were repeated every 28 days for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS A total of 278 patients were randomly assigned in this Intergroup study. Treatment with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide was associated with a significantly higher complete response (CR) rate (23.4% v 4.6%; P < .001) and a higher overall response (OR) rate (74.3% v 59.5%, P = .013) than treatment with fludarabine as a single agent. Progression-free survival (PFS) was also superior in patients treated with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide than those treated with fludarabine (31.6 v 19.2 months, P < .0001). Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide caused additional hematologic toxicity, including more severe thrombocytopenia (P = .046), but it did not increase the number of severe infections (P = .812). CONCLUSION Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide produced an increase in OR and CR, and it improved PFS in patients with previously untreated CLL compared with fludarabine alone and was not associated with an increase in infectious toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian W Flinn
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Fabry disease results in a global vasculopathy leading to early-onset stroke and renal and cardiac failure. We found that random myeloperoxidase in serum and plasma was significantly elevated in 73 consecutive male patients with Fabry disease. Random serum myeloperoxidase level in men predicted the risk of a Fabry vasculopathy-related event in subsequent years. Long-term enzyme replacement therapy did not reduce myeloperoxidase level or eliminate the risk of vasculopathic events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C R Kaneski
- Developmental and Metabolic Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1260, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ries M, Kim HJ, Zalewski CK, Mastroianni MA, Moore DF, Brady RO, Dambrosia JM, Schiffmann R, Brewer CC. Neuropathic and cerebrovascular correlates of hearing loss in Fabry disease. Brain 2006; 130:143-50. [PMID: 17105746 PMCID: PMC1950668 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awl310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Fabry disease, OMIM 301500, is a progressive multisystem storage disorder due to the deficiency of alpha-galactosidase A (GALA). Neurological and vascular manifestations of this disorder with regard to hearing loss have not been analysed quantitatively in large cohorts. We conducted a retrospective cross sectional analysis of hearing loss in 109 male and female patients with Fabry disease who were referred to and seen at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA on natural history and enzyme replacement study protocols. There were 85 males aged 6-58 years (mean 31 years, SD 13) and 24 females aged 22-72 years (mean 42 years, SD 12). All patients underwent a comprehensive audiological evaluation. In addition, cerebral white matter lesions, peripheral neuropathy, and kidney function were quantitatively assessed. HL(95), defined as a hearing threshold above the 95th percentile for age and gender matched normal controls, was present in 56% [95% CI (42.2-67.2)] of the males. Prevalence of HL(95) was lower in the group of patients with residual GALA enzyme activity compared with those without detectable activity (33% versus 63%) HL(95) was present in the low-, mid- and high-frequency ranges for all ages. Male patients with HL(95) had a higher microvascular cerebral white matter lesion load [1.4, interquartile range (IQR) 0-30.1 +/- versus 0, IQR 0-0], more pronounced cold perception deficit [19.4 +/- 5.5 versus 13.5 +/- 5.5 of just noticeable difference (JND) units] and lower kidney function [creatinine: 1.6 +/- 1.2 versus 0.77 +/- 0.2 mg/dl; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): 20.1 +/- 14.1 versus 10.3 +/- 3.28 mg/dl] than those without HL(95) (P < 0.001). Of the females, 38% had HL(95). There was no significant association with cold perception deficit, creatinine or BUN in the females. Word recognition and acoustic reflexes analyses suggested a predominant cochlear involvement. We conclude that hearing loss involving all frequency regions significantly contributes to morbidity in patients with Fabry disease. Our quantitative analysis suggests a correlation of neuropathic and vascular damage with hearing loss in the males. Residual GALA activity appears to have a protective effect against hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ries
- Developmental and Metabolic Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1260, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Moore DF, Zhowandai MH, Ferguson DM, McGee C, Mott JB, Stewart JC. Comparison of 16S rRNA sequencing with conventional and commercial phenotypic techniques for identification of enterococci from the marine environment. J Appl Microbiol 2006; 100:1272-81. [PMID: 16696674 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02879.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To compare accuracy of genus and species level identification of presumptive enterococci isolates from the marine environment using conventional biochemical testing, four commercial identification systems and 16S rRNA sequence analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS Ninety-seven environmental bacterial isolates identified as presumptive enterococci on mEI media were tested using conventional and Enterococcus genus screen biochemical tests, four commercial testing systems and 16S rRNA sequencing. Conventional and Enterococcus genus screen biochemical testing, 16S rRNA sequencing and two commercial test systems achieved an accuracy of > or = 94% for Enterococcus genus confirmation. Conventional biochemical testing and 16S rRNA sequencing achieved an accuracy of > or = 90% for species level identification. CONCLUSIONS For confirmation of Enterococcus genus from mEI media, conventional or genus screen biochemical testing, 16S rRNA sequencing and the four commercial systems were correct 79-100% of the time. For speciation to an accuracy of 90% or better, either conventional biochemical testing or 16S rRNA sequencing is required. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY Accurate identification of presumptive environmental Enterococcus isolates to genus and species level is an integral part of laboratory quality assurance and further characterization of Enterococcus species from pollution incidents. This investigation determines the ability of six different methods to correctly identify environmental isolates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D F Moore
- Orange County Public Health Laboratory, Newport Beach, CA 92660, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, Greipp PR, Lazarus HM, Hurd DD, McCoy J, Moore DF, Dakhil SR, Lanier KS, Chapman RA, Cromer JN, Salmon SE, Durie B, Crowley JC. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:929-36. [PMID: 16432076 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2005.04.5807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 362] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Results of a prospective randomized trial conducted by the Intergroupe Francais du Myélome (IFM 90) indicated that autologous hematopoietic cell-supported high-dose therapy (HDT) effected higher complete response rates and extended progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with standard-dose therapies (SDT) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS In 1993, three North American cooperative groups launched a prospective randomized trial (S9321) comparing HDT (melphalan [MEL] 140 mg/m2 plus total-body irradiation 12 Gy) with SDT using the vincristine, carmustine, MEL, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone regimen. Responders on both arms (> or = 75%) were randomly assigned to interferon (IFN) or no maintenance treatment. RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 76 months, no differences were observed in response rates between the two study arms (HDT, n = 261 patients; SDT, n = 255 patients). Similarly, PFS and OS durations did not differ between the HDT and SDT arms, with 7-year estimates of PFS of 17% and 16%, respectively, and OS of 37% and 42%, respectively. Of 242 patients achieving at least 75% tumor reduction, no difference was observed in PFS or OS among the 121 patients randomly assigned to IFN and the 121 patients randomly assigned to no maintenance therapy. Among 157 patients relapsing on SDT, 87 received a salvage autotransplantation; their median survival time of 30 months was only slightly better than the survival time of the remaining patients who were managed with further SDT (23 months; P = .13). CONCLUSION The HDT and SDT regimens used in S9321 yielded comparable response rates and PFS and OS durations. IFN maintenance therapy did not benefit patients who achieved > or = 75% tumor reduction on either arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Barlogie
- University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ferguson DM, Moore DF, Getrich MA, Zhowandai MH. Enumeration and speciation of enterococci found in marine and intertidal sediments and coastal water in southern California. J Appl Microbiol 2005; 99:598-608. [PMID: 16108802 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02660.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To determine the levels and species distribution of enterococci in intertidal and marine sediments and coastal waters at two beaches frequently in violation of bacterial water standards. METHODS AND RESULTS Faecal indicator bacteria were extracted from sediment and enumerated using membrane filtration. High levels of enterococci were detected in intertidal sediments in a seasonal river and near a storm drain outlet. Low levels were found in marine sediments at 10 m depths and in surf zone sand. Bacterial isolates presumptively identified as Enterococcus on mEI media were speciated. The predominant species found in both water and sediment included Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus hirae, Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus mundtii. A number of isolates (11-26%) from regulatory water samples presumptively identified as enterococci on mEI media were subsequently identified as species other than Enterococcus. At both study sites, the distribution of species present in water was comparable with those in sediments and the distribution of species was similar in water samples passing and exceeding bacterial indicator standards. CONCLUSIONS High levels of Enterococcus in intertidal sediments indicate retention and possible regrowth in this environment. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY Resuspension of enterococci that are persistent in sediments may cause beach water quality failures and calls into question the specificity of this indicator for determining recent faecal contamination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Ferguson
- Orange County Public Health Laboratory, 700 Shellmaker Road, Newport Beach, CA 92660, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Moore DF, Harwood VJ, Ferguson DM, Lukasik J, Hannah P, Getrich M, Brownell M. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed. J Appl Microbiol 2005; 99:618-28. [PMID: 16108804 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02612.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The accuracy of ribotyping and antibiotic resistance analysis (ARA) for prediction of sources of faecal bacterial pollution in an urban southern California watershed was determined using blinded proficiency samples. METHODS AND RESULTS Antibiotic resistance patterns and HindIII ribotypes of Escherichia coli (n = 997), and antibiotic resistance patterns of Enterococcus spp. (n = 3657) were used to construct libraries from sewage samples and from faeces of seagulls, dogs, cats, horses and humans within the watershed. The three libraries were analysed to determine the accuracy of host source prediction. The internal accuracy of the libraries (average rate of correct classification, ARCC) with six source categories was 44% for E. coli ARA, 69% for E. coli ribotyping and 48% for Enterococcus ARA. Each library's predictive ability towards isolates that were not part of the library was determined using a blinded proficiency panel of 97 E. coli and 99 Enterococcus isolates. Twenty-eight per cent (by ARA) and 27% (by ribotyping) of the E. coli proficiency isolates were assigned to the correct source category. Sixteen per cent were assigned to the same source category by both methods, and 6% were assigned to the correct category. Addition of 2480 E. coli isolates to the ARA library did not improve the ARCC or proficiency accuracy. In contrast, 45% of Enterococcus proficiency isolates were correctly identified by ARA. CONCLUSIONS None of the methods performed well enough on the proficiency panel to be judged ready for application to environmental samples. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY Most microbial source tracking (MST) studies published have demonstrated library accuracy solely by the internal ARCC measurement. Low rates of correct classification for E. coli proficiency isolates compared with the ARCCs of the libraries indicate that testing of bacteria from samples that are not represented in the library, such as blinded proficiency samples, is necessary to accurately measure predictive ability. The library-based MST methods used in this study may not be suited for determination of the source(s) of faecal pollution in large, urban watersheds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D F Moore
- Orange County Public Health Laboratory, Santa Ana, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Alberts SR, Schroeder M, Erlichman C, Steen PD, Foster NR, Moore DF, Rowland KM, Nair S, Tschetter LK, Fitch TR. Gemcitabine and ISIS-2503 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 22:4944-50. [PMID: 15611509 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Gemcitabine remains the standard therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA), but has limited activity. ISIS-2503 is an antisense compound directed against H-ras with preclinical activity against pancreatic ACA in tumor models. The combination of ISIS-2503 and gemcitabine has been evaluated in a prior phase I study. METHODS Patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic ACA not amenable to surgery or local radiation received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and ISIS-2503 6 mg/kg/d as a continuous intravenous infusion over 14 days of an every-3-weeks cycle. Responses were monitored by radiologic imaging every 6 weeks. RESULTS Forty-eight eligible patients were enrolled, 43 with metastatic disease. Median follow-up was 12.6 months (range, 2.2 to 16.8 months) for living patients. A median of four cycles of treatment was given (range, 1 to 18 cycles). All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The 6-month survival percentage was 57.5% (95% CI, 44.9% to 73.5%) and the median survival was 6.6 months. The response rate was 10.4% (one complete response, four partial responses). Clinically significant toxicity was limited except for one fatal pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION This study shows a promising response rate to the combination of gemcitabine and ISIS-2503 in patients with pancreatic ACA. The observed 6-month survival rate in these patients met our protocol-defined criteria for success. This regimen is tolerable, but is of unclear benefit. Additional studies evaluating the role of gemcitabine and ISIS-2503 in the treatment of pancreatic ACA should be considered.
Collapse
|