1
|
Hao Q, Aertgeerts B, Guyatt G, Bekkering GE, Vandvik PO, Khan SU, Rodondi N, Jackson R, Reny JL, Al Ansary L, Van Driel M, Assendelft WJJ, Agoritsas T, Spencer F, Siemieniuk RAC, Lytvyn L, Heen AF, Zhao Q, Riaz IB, Ramaekers D, Okwen PM, Zhu Y, Dawson A, Ovidiu MC, Vanbrabant W, Li S, Delvaux N. PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe for the reduction of cardiovascular events: a clinical practice guideline with risk-stratified recommendations. BMJ 2022; 377:e069066. [PMID: 35508320 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
CLINICAL QUESTION In adults with low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels >1.8 mmol/L (>70 mg/dL) who are already taking the maximum dose of statins or are intolerant to statins, should another lipid-lowering drug be added, either a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor or ezetimibe, to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events? If so, which drug is preferred? Having decided to use one, should we add the other lipid-lowering drug? CURRENT PRACTICE Most guidelines emphasise LDL cholesterol targets in their recommendations for prescribing PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe in adults at high risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event. However, to achieve these goals in very high risk patients with statins alone is almost impossible, so physicians are increasingly considering other lipid-lowering drugs solely for achieving LDL cholesterol treatment goals rather than for achieving important absolute cardiovascular risk reduction. Most guidelines do not systematically assess the cardiovascular benefits of adding PCSK9 inhibitors and/or ezetimibe for all risk groups across primary and secondary prevention, nor do they report, in accordance with explicit judgments of assumed patients' values and preferences, absolute benefits and harms and potential treatment burdens. RECOMMENDATIONS The guideline panel provided mostly weak recommendations, which means we rely on shared decision making when applying these recommendations. For adults already using statins, the panel suggests adding a second lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but recommends against adding it in people at low cardiovascular risk. For adults who are intolerant to statins, the panel recommends using a lipid-lowering drug in people at very high and high cardiovascular risk but against adding it in those at low cardiovascular risk. When choosing to add another lipid-lowering drug, the panel suggests ezetimibe in preference to PCSK9 inhibitors. The panel suggests further adding a PCSK9 inhibitor to ezetimibe for adults already taking statins at very high risk and those at very high and high risk who are intolerant to statins. HOW THIS GUIDELINE WAS CREATED An international panel including patients, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations following standards for trustworthy guidelines and using the GRADE approach. The panel identified four risk groups of patients (low, moderate, high, and very high cardiovascular risk) and primarily applied an individual patient perspective in moving from evidence to recommendations, though societal issues were a secondary consideration. The panel considered the balance of benefits and harms and burdens of starting a PCSK9 inhibitor and/or ezetimibe, making assumptions of adults' average values and preferences. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids accompany multi-layered recommendations, developed in an online authoring and publication platform (www.magicapp.org) that also allows re-use and adaptation. THE EVIDENCE A linked systematic review and network meta-analysis (14 trials including 83 660 participants) of benefits found that PCSK9 inhibitors or ezetimibe probably reduce myocardial infarctions and stroke in patients with very high and high cardiovascular risk, with no impact on mortality (moderate to high certainty evidence), but not in those with moderate and low cardiovascular risk. PCSK9 inhibitors may have similar effects to ezetimibe on reducing non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke (low certainty evidence). These relative benefits were consistent, but their absolute magnitude varied based on cardiovascular risk in individual patients (for example, for 1000 people treated with PCSK9 inhibitors in addition to statins over five years, benefits ranged from 2 fewer strokes in the lowest risk to 21 fewer in the highest risk). Two systematic reviews on harms found no important adverse events for these drugs (moderate to high certainty evidence). PCSK9 inhibitors require injections that sometimes result in injection site reactions (best estimate 15 more per 1000 in a 5 year timeframe), representing a burden and harm that may matter to patients. The MATCH-IT decision support tool allows you to interact with the evidence and your patients across the alternative options: https://magicevidence.org/match-it/220504dist-lipid-lowering-drugs/. UNDERSTANDING THE RECOMMENDATIONS The stratification into four cardiovascular risk groups means that, to use the recommendations, physicians need to identify their patient's risk first. We therefore suggest, specific to various geographical regions, using some reliable risk calculators that estimate patients' cardiovascular risk based on a mix of known risk factors. The largely weak recommendations concerning the addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors reflect what the panel considered to be a close balance between small reductions in stroke and myocardial infarctions weighed against the burdens and limited harms.Because of the anticipated large variability of patients' values and preferences, well informed choices warrant shared decision making. Interactive evidence summaries and decision aids linked to the recommendations can facilitate such shared decisions. The strong recommendations against adding another drug in people at low cardiovascular risk reflect what the panel considered to be a burden without important benefits. The strong recommendation for adding either ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors in people at high and very high cardiovascular risk reflect a clear benefit.The panel recognised the key uncertainty in the evidence concerning patient values and preferences, namely that what most people consider important reductions in cardiovascular risks, weighed against burdens and harms, remains unclear. Finally, availability and costs will influence decisions when healthcare systems, clinicians, or people consider adding ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiukui Hao
- The Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics/National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care and MAGIC Primary Care, Academisch Centrum voor Huisartsgeneeskunde, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Geertruida E Bekkering
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care and MAGIC Primary Care, Academisch Centrum voor Huisartsgeneeskunde, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Per Olav Vandvik
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation
| | - Safi U Khan
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston TX, USA
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rod Jackson
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jean-Luc Reny
- General Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Switzerland
| | - Lubna Al Ansary
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mieke Van Driel
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Willem J J Assendelft
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Agoritsas
- Division General Internal Medicine & Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Reed A C Siemieniuk
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lyubov Lytvyn
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation
| | - Anja Fog Heen
- Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Qian Zhao
- International Medical Center / Ward of General Practice, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Irbaz Bin Riaz
- Department of Medicine, Hematology Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Arziona, USA
| | - Dirk Ramaekers
- KU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Ye Zhu
- Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | | | | | | | - Sheyu Li
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Guideline and Rapid Recommendation, Cochrane China Center, MAGIC China Center, Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Nicolas Delvaux
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care and MAGIC Primary Care, Academisch Centrum voor Huisartsgeneeskunde, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van den Steen E, Ramaekers D, Horlait M, Gutermuth J. Development of a Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) for Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36:913-921. [PMID: 35122348 PMCID: PMC9303960 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Patient involvement and high‐quality patient‐provider interactions are critical factors for quality of care in chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Also, assessing the patient's perspective contributes to optimizing care delivery and patient's experience. Until today, no user‐friendly tools to measure patient experiences exist within immunodermatology. Objectives The aim of this study was to identify the relevant items for patient's experience in immunodermatology and develop a concise questionnaire to assess patient's experience in routine clinical care. Methods Potential relevant items for measuring patient's perspective of immunodermatology care were identified by a literature search. From this longlist, a shortlist from patient's perspective was distilled by semi‐structured interviews with a diverse patient group. This list was reduced to final items using a modified Delphi method in a multi‐stakeholder focus group. For each item, one question was formulated to generate the Patient‐Reported Experience Measure (PREM) questionnaire. A first internal validation was achieved by an email round. Results Forty longlist items were categorized into five domains (access to care, patient centeredness, access to information, care process and satisfaction). During interview rounds, 19 shortlist items were selected if mentioned by ≥40% of interviewees. Via the focus group, the most important items were chosen by participant consensus. For each item, a question was formulated. The final PREM covers 11 items (plus 2 in case of a first consult). The first internal validation showed that the tool is clear, understandable and has an ideal length. Conclusion This short user‐friendly PREM can be used in scientific and routine settings to improve care for patients who suffer from chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Linked Commentary: A.‐H. Fink‐Wagner. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36: 767–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18153.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Van den Steen
- Department of Dermatology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.,Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Department of Public Health, Research Group Organisation, Policy and Social Inequalities in Health Care (OPIH), 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - D Ramaekers
- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL), Leuvens Institute for Healthcare Policy (LIHP), Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Horlait
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Department of Public Health, Research Group Organisation, Policy and Social Inequalities in Health Care (OPIH), 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J Gutermuth
- Department of Dermatology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stessel B, Callebaut I, Polus F, Geebelen L, Evers S, Ory JP, Magerman K, Souverijns G, Braeken G, Ramaekers D, Cox J. Evaluation of a comprehensive pre-procedural screening protocol for COVID-19 in times of a high SARS CoV-2 prevalence: a prospective cross-sectional study. Ann Med 2021; 53:337-344. [PMID: 33583292 PMCID: PMC7889170 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1878272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To minimise the risk of COVID-19 transmission, an ambulant screening protocol for COVID-19 in patients before admission to the hospital was implemented, combining the SARS CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal swab, a chest computed tomography (CT) and assessment of clinical symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluatethe diagnostic yield and the proportionality of this pre-procedural screeningprotocol. METHODS In this mono-centre, prospective, cross-sectional study, all patients admitted to the hospital between 22nd April 2020 until 14th May 2020 for semi-urgent surgery, haematological or oncological treatment, or electrophysiological investigationunderwent a COVID-19 screening 2 days before their procedure. At a 2-week follow-up, the presence of clinical symptoms was evaluated by telephone as a post-hoc evaluation of the screening approach.Combined positive RT-PCR assay and/or positive chest CT was used as gold standard. Post-procedural outcomes of all patients diagnosed positive for COVID-19 were assessed. RESULTS In total,528 patients were included of which 20 (3.8%) were diagnosed as COVID-19 positive and 508 (96.2%) as COVID-19 negative. 11 (55.0%) of COVID-19 positive patients had only a positive RT-PCR assay, 3 (15.0%) had only a positive chest CT and 6 (30%) had both a positive RT-PCR assay and chest CT. 10 out of 20 (50.0%) COVID-19 positive patients reported no single clinical symptom at the screening. At 2 week follow-up, 50% of these patients were still asymptomatic. 37.5% of all COVID-19 negative patients were symptomatic at screening. In the COVID-19 negative group without symptoms at screening, 78 (29.3%) patients developed clinical symptoms at a 2-week follow-up. CONCLUSION This study suggests that routine chest CT and assessment of self-reported symptoms have limited value in the preprocedural COVID-19 screening due to low sensitivity and/or specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Stessel
- Department of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
- UHasselt, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, LCRC, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Ina Callebaut
- Department of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
- UHasselt, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, LCRC, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Fréderic Polus
- Department of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Laurien Geebelen
- Department of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Stefan Evers
- Department of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Jean-Paul Ory
- Department of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Koen Magerman
- UHasselt, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, LCRC, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Clinical Laboratory, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | | | - Geert Braeken
- Department of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy (LIHP), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Janneke Cox
- UHasselt, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, LCRC, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Triest D, Geebelen L, De Pauw R, De Craeye S, Vodolazkaia A, Verbrugghe M, Magerman K, Robben LL, Pannus P, Neven K, Ramaekers D, Van Gucht S, Dierick K, Van Loon N, Goossens ME, Desombere I. Performance of five rapid serological tests in mild-diseased subjects using finger prick blood for exposure assessment to SARS-CoV-2. J Clin Virol 2021; 142:104897. [PMID: 34304089 PMCID: PMC8282933 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Assess the performance of five SARS-CoV-2 rapid serological tests (RST) using finger prick (FP) blood on-site to evaluate their usability for exposure assessment in population-based seroprevalence studies. STUDY DESIGN Since cross-reactivity with common cold human coronaviruses occurs, serological testing includes a risk of false-positive results. Therefore, the selected cohort for RST-validation was based on combined immunoassay (presence of specific antibodies) and RT-qPCR (presence of SARS-CoV-2) data. RST-performance for FP blood and serum was assessed by performing each RST in two groups, namely SARSCoV- 2 positive (n=108) and negative healthcare workers (n=89). Differences in accuracy and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated for a range (1-50%) of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence estimates. RESULTS The OrientGene showed overall acceptable performance, with sensitivities of 94.4% and 100%, and specificities of 96.6% and 94.4%, using FP blood and serum, respectively. Although three RST reach optimal specificities (100%), the OrientGene clearly outperforms in sensitivity. At a SARS-CoV-2 prevalence rate of 40%, this RST outperforms the other tests in NPV (96.3%) and reaches comparable PPV (94.9%). Although the specificity of the Covid-Presto is excellent when using FP blood or serum (100% and 97.8%, respectively), its sensitivity decreases when using FP blood (76.9%) compared to serum (98.1%). CONCLUSIONS Performances of the evaluated RST differ largely. Only one out of five RST (OrientGene) had acceptable sensitivity and specificity using FP blood. Therefore, the latter could be used for seroprevalence studies in a high-prevalence situation. The OrientGene, which measures anti-RBD antibodies, can be valuable after vaccination as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Triest
- SD Infectious Diseases in Humans, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Robby De Pauw
- SD Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Pieter Pannus
- SD Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kristof Neven
- SD Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Van Loon N, Verbrugghe M, Cartuyvels R, Ramaekers D. Diagnosis of COVID-19 Based on Symptomatic Analysis of Hospital Healthcare Workers in Belgium: Observational Study in a Large Belgian Tertiary Care Center During Early COVID-19 Outbreak. J Occup Environ Med 2021; 63:27-31. [PMID: 32858554 PMCID: PMC7773160 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify early symptoms allowing rapid appraisal of infection with SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare workers of a large Belgian hospital. METHODS Healthcare workers with mild symptoms of an acute respiratory tract infection were systematically screened on clinical characteristics of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A nasopharyngeal swab was taken and analyzed by real-time Reverse-Transcription-Polymerase-Chain-Reaction (rRT-PCR). RESULTS Fifty percent of 373 workers tested COVID-19 positive. The symptoms cough (82%), headache (78%), myalgia (70%), loss of smell or taste (40%), and fever more than or equal to 37.5 °C (76%) were significantly higher among those infected. CONCLUSION Where each individual symptom contributes to the clinical evaluation of possible infection, it is the combination of COVID-19 symptoms that could allow for a rapid diagnostic appraisal of the disease in a high prevalence setting. Early transmission control is important at the onset of an epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nele Van Loon
- Mensura, Occupational Health Service (OHS), Brussels (Dr Van Loon, Dr Verbrugghe); Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Ghent, Ghent (Dr Verbrugghe); Jessa Hospital, Hasselt (Dr Cartuyvels, Dr Ramaekers); Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy (LIHP), University of Leuven, Leuven (Dr Ramaekers), Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delvaux N, Piessens V, Burghgraeve TD, Mamouris P, Vaes B, Stichele RV, Cloetens H, Thomas J, Ramaekers D, Sutter AD, Aertgeerts B. Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci 2020; 15:100. [PMID: 33148311 PMCID: PMC7640389 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01059-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inappropriate laboratory test ordering poses an important burden for healthcare. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been cited as promising tools to improve laboratory test ordering behavior. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of an intervention that integrated a clinical decision support service into a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) on the appropriateness and volume of laboratory test ordering, and on diagnostic error in primary care. Methods This study was a pragmatic, cluster randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial. Setting Two hundred eighty general practitioners (GPs) from 72 primary care practices in Belgium. Patients Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a laboratory test order for at least one of 17 indications: cardiovascular disease management, hypertension, check-up, chronic kidney disease (CKD), thyroid disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, fatigue, anemia, liver disease, gout, suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), suspicion of lung embolism, rheumatoid arthritis, sexually transmitted infections (STI), acute diarrhea, chronic diarrhea, and follow-up of medication. Interventions The CDSS was integrated into a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in the form of evidence-based order sets that suggested appropriate tests based on the indication provided by the general physician. Measurements The primary outcome of the ELMO study was the proportion of appropriate tests over the total number of ordered tests and inappropriately not-requested tests. Secondary outcomes of the ELMO study included diagnostic error, test volume, and cascade activities. Results CDSS increased the proportion of appropriate tests by 0.21 (95% CI 0.16–0.26, p < 0.0001) for all tests included in the study. GPs in the CDSS arm ordered 7 (7.15 (95% CI 3.37–10.93, p = 0.0002)) tests fewer per panel. CDSS did not increase diagnostic error. The absolute difference in proportions was a decrease of 0.66% (95% CI 1.4% decrease–0.05% increase) in possible diagnostic error. Conclusions A CDSS in the form of order sets, integrated within the CPOE improved appropriateness and decreased volume of laboratory test ordering without increasing diagnostic error. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02950142, registered on October 25, 2016 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-020-01059-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Delvaux
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Veerle Piessens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tine De Burghgraeve
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pavlos Mamouris
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bert Vaes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert Vander Stichele
- Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hanne Cloetens
- Center for General Practice, University of Antwerp, Gouverneur Kinsbergen Centrum, Doornstraat 331, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An De Sutter
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 Blok J PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Wilder A, Vanhaecht K, De Ridder D, Cox B, Brouwers J, Claessens F, De Wachter D, Deneckere S, Ramaekers D, Tambuyzer E, Weeghmans I, Bruyneel L. Six years of measuring patient experiences in Belgium: Limited improvement and lack of association with improvement strategies. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241408. [PMID: 33141857 PMCID: PMC7608918 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine trends in patient experiences in the period 2014-2019, describe improvement strategies implemented by hospitals in the same period, and study associations between patient experiences and implemented strategies. DESIGN Multi-center retrospective region-wide observational design. SETTING Flanders, Belgium. PARTICIPANTS 44 out of 46 Flemish acute-care hospitals publicly reporting patient experiences via the Flemish Patient Survey (FPS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Primary outcomes were the two global FPS ratings: percentage of patients rating the hospital 9 or 10 and percentage of patients definitely recommending the hospital. Secondary outcomes were the average top-box score percentages for each of the 8 remaining dimensions of the FPS. RESULTS Between 2014 and 2019, there was a significant improvement in patients scoring the hospital 9 or 10 (56% to 61%) and patients definitely recommending (67% to 70%) the hospital. Significant increases in patient experiences over time were also observed in other dimensions, except for the dimension discharge. Hospital key informants reported various improvement strategies related to patient experiences with care and the FPS. Feedback to nursing wards (n = 44, 100%) and clinicians (n = 39, 89%) were most common. Overall, most improvement strategies were not or only weakly associated with patient experience ratings in 2019 and changes in ratings over time. Still, positive associations were discovered between the strategies 'nursing ward interventions' and 'hospital wide education' and recommendation of the hospital. CONCLUSIONS Patient experiences have improved modestly in Flemish acute-care hospitals. Hospitals report to have invested in patient experience improvement strategies but positive associations between such strategies and FPS scores are weak, although there is potential in further exploring nursing ward interventions and hospital wide education. Hospitals should continue their efforts to improve the patient's experience, but with a more targeted approach, taking the lessons learned on the efficacy of strategies into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Van Wilder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Kris Vanhaecht
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Bianca Cox
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Jonas Brouwers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Fien Claessens
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | | | - Svin Deneckere
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Flemish Institute for Quality of Care, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Flemish Hospital Indicator Initiative, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Luk Bruyneel
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven—University of Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stessel B, Vanvuchelen C, Bruckers L, Geebelen L, Callebaut I, Vandenbrande J, Pellens B, Van Tornout M, Ory JP, van Halem K, Messiaen P, Herbots L, Ramaekers D, Dubois J. Impact of implementation of an individualised thromboprophylaxis protocol in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19: A longitudinal controlled before-after study. Thromb Res 2020; 194:209-215. [PMID: 32788120 PMCID: PMC7375318 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction An individualised thromboprophylaxis was implemented in critically ill patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia to reduce mortality and improve clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of this intervention on clinical outcome. Methods In this mono-centric, controlled, before-after study, all consecutive adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to ICU from March 13th to April 20th 2020 were included. A thromboprophylaxis protocol, including augmented LMWH dosing, individually tailored with anti-Xa measurements and twice-weekly ultrasonography screening for DVT, was implemented on March 31th 2020. Primary endpoint is one-month mortality. Secondary outcomes include two-week and three-week mortality, the incidence of VTE, acute kidney injury and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Multiple regression modelling was used to correct for differences between the two groups. Results 46 patients were included in the before group, 26 patients in the after group. One month mortality decreased from 39.13% to 3.85% (p < 0.001). After correction for confounding variables, one-month mortality was significantly higher in the before group (p = 0.02, OR 8.86 (1.46, 53.75)). The cumulative incidence of VTE and CRRT was respectively 41% and 30.4% in the before group and dropped to 15% (p = 0.03) and 3.8% (p = 0.01), respectively. After correction for confounding variables, risk of VTE (p = 0.03, 6.01 (1.13, 32.12)) and CRRT (p = 0.02, OR 19.21 (1.44, 255.86)) remained significantly higher in the before group. Conclusion Mortality, cumulative risk of VTE and need for CRRT may be significantly reduced in COVID-19 patients by implementation of a more aggressive thromboprophylaxis protocol. Future research should focus on confirmation of these results in a randomized design and on uncovering the mechanisms underlying these observations. Registration number NCT04394000. An individualised thromboprophylaxis was implemented in critically ill COVID-19 patients. One-month mortality was reduced after implementation of this protocol Cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism was lower after implementation. Less need for continuous renal replacement therapy in the after group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Stessel
- Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium; UHasselt, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, LCRC, Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
| | | | - Liesbeth Bruckers
- I-BioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Laurien Geebelen
- Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Ina Callebaut
- Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium; UHasselt, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, LCRC, Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Vandenbrande
- Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Ben Pellens
- Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Michiel Van Tornout
- Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Jean-Paul Ory
- Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Karlijn van Halem
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Peter Messiaen
- UHasselt, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, LCRC, Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Lieven Herbots
- Department of Cardiology and Coronary Care Unit, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Chief Medical Officer, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium; Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy (LIHP), University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasperina Dubois
- Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Halem K, Cox J, Messiaen P, Pat K, Declercq C, Meersman A, Ramaekers D, Cartuyvels R, van der Hilst J. Care for adult non-ICU Covid-19 patients: early experiences from a Belgian tertiary care centre. Neth J Med 2020; 78:111-115. [PMID: 32332185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The current Covid-19 outbreak poses many challenges on hospital organisation and patient care. Our hospital lies at the epicentre of the Belgian epidemic. On April 1st, a total of 235 Covid-19 patients had been admitted to our hospital. This demanded an unprecedented adaptation of our hospital organisation, and we have met many clinical issues in the care for Covid-19 patients. In this article, we share our experience in the handling of some of the practical and organisational issues in the care for Covid-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K van Halem
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heselmans A, Delvaux N, Laenen A, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, Kunnamo I, Aertgeerts B. Computerized clinical decision support system for diabetes in primary care does not improve quality of care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci 2020; 15:5. [PMID: 31910877 PMCID: PMC6947861 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0955-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The EBMeDS system is the computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) system of EBPNet, a national computerized point-of-care information service in Belgium. There is no clear evidence of more complex CCDS systems to manage chronic diseases in primary care practices (PCPs). The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of EBMeDS use in improving diabetes care. Methods A cluster-randomized trial with before-and-after measurements was performed in Belgian PCPs over 1 year, from May 2017 to May 2018. We randomly assigned 51 practices to either the intervention group (IG), to receive the EBMeDS system, or to the control group (CG), to receive usual care. Primary and secondary outcomes were the 1-year pre- to post-implementation change in HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Composite patient and process scores were calculated. A process evaluation was added to the analysis. Results were analyzed at 6 and 12 months. Linear mixed models and logistic regression models based on generalized estimating equations were used where appropriate. Results Of the 51 PCPs that were enrolled and randomly assigned (26 PCPs in the CG and 25 in the IG), 29 practices (3815 patients) were analyzed in the study: 2464 patients in the CG and 1351 patients in the IG. No change differences existed between groups in primary or secondary outcomes. Change difference between CG and IG after 1-year follow-up was − 0.09 (95% CI − 0.18; 0.01, p-value = 0.06) for HbA1c; 1.76 (95% CI − 0.46; 3.98, p-value = 0.12) for LDL cholesterol; and 0.13 (95% CI − 0.91; 1.16, p-value = 0.81) and 0.12 (95% CI − 1.25;1.49, p-value = 0.86) for systolic and diastolic blood pressure respectively. The odds ratio of the IG versus the CG for the probability of no worsening and improvement was 1.09 (95% CI 0.73; 1.63, p-value = 0.67) for the process composite score and 0.74 (95% CI 0.49; 1.12, p-value = 0.16) for the composite patient score. All but one physician was satisfied with the EBMeDS system. Conclusions The CCDS system EBMeDS did not improve diabetes care in Belgian primary care. The lack of improvement was mainly caused by imperfections in the organizational context of Belgian primary care for chronic disease management and shortcomings in the system requirements for the correct use of the EBMeDS system (e.g., complete structured records). These shortcomings probably caused low-use rates of the system. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01830569, Registered 12 April 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemie Heselmans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok j, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Nicolas Delvaux
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok j, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok j, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stijn Van de Velde
- Centre for Informed Health Choices, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 222, Skøyen, 0213, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok d, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ilkka Kunnamo
- Duodecim, Scientific Society of Finnish Physicians, PO Box 874, Kaivokatu 10, 00101, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok j, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fervers B, Remy-Stockinger M, Mazeau-Woynar V, Otter R, Liberati A, Littlejohns P, Qureshi S, Vlayen J, Characiejus D, Corbacho B, Garner S, Hamza-Mohamed F, Hermosilla T, Kersten S, Kulig M, Leshem B, Levine N, Ballini L, Middelton C, Mlika-Cabane N, Paquet L, Podmaniczki E, Ramaekers D, Robinson E, Sanchez E, Philip T. CoCanCPG. Coordination of Cancer Clinical Practice in Europe. Tumori 2018; 94:154-9. [DOI: 10.1177/030089160809400204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
All European countries are facing common challenges for delivering appropriate, evidence-based care to patients with cancer. Despite tangible improvements in diagnosis and treatment, marked differences in cancer survival exist throughout Europe. The reliable translation of new research evidence into consistent patient-oriented strategies is a key endeavour to overcome inequalities in healthcare. Clinical-practice guidelines are important tools for improving quality of care by informing professionals and patients about the most appropriate clinical practice. Guideline programmes in different countries use similar strategies to achieve similar goals. This results in unnecessary duplication of effort and inefficient use of resources. While different initiatives at the international level have attempted to improve the quality of guidelines, less investment has been made to overcome existing fragmentation and duplication of effort in cancer guideline development and research. To provide added value to existing initiatives and foster equitable access to evidence-based cancer care in Europe, CoCanCPG will establish cooperation between cancer guideline programmes. CoCanCPG is an ERA-Net coordinated by the French National Cancer Institute with 17 partners from 11 countries. The CoCanCPG partners will achieve their goal through an ambitious, step-wise approach with a long-term perspective, involving: 1. implementing a common framework for sharing knowledge and skills; 2. developing shared activities for guideline development; 3. assembling a critical mass for pertinent research into guideline methods; 4. implementing an appropriate framework for cooperation. Successful development of joint activities involves learning how to adopt common quality standards and how to share responsibilities, while taking into account the cultural and organisational diversity of the participating organisations. Languages barriers and different organisational settings add a level of complexity to setting up transnational collaboration. Through its activities, CoCanCPG will make an important contribution towards better access to evidence-based cancer practices and thus contribute to reducing inequalities and improving care for patients with cancer across Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bèatrice Fervers
- Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, SOR/Centre Léon Bérard, EA 4129 Santé-Individu-Société, Lyon, France
| | - Magali Remy-Stockinger
- Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, SOR/Centre Léon Bérard, EA 4129 Santé-Individu-Société, Lyon, France
| | | | - Renèe Otter
- Vereniging van Integrale Kankercentra, ACCC, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alessandro Liberati
- Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale, Regione Emilia-Romagna, ASR E-R, Bologna, Italy
| | - Peter Littlejohns
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NICE, London, United Kingdom
| | - Safia Qureshi
- NHS, Quality Improvement Scotland, SIGN, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, KCE, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Belèn Corbacho
- Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment, AETSA, Seville, Spain
| | - Sarah Garner
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NICE, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Teresa Hermosilla
- Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment, AETSA, Seville, Spain
| | - Sonja Kersten
- Vereniging van Integrale Kankercentra, ACCC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Kulig
- Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, IQWiG, Köln, Germany
| | - Benny Leshem
- Israeli Ministry of Health, Office CSO-MOH, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nava Levine
- Israeli Ministry of Health, Office CSO-MOH, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Luciana Ballini
- Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale, Regione Emilia-Romagna, ASR E-R, Bologna, Italy
| | - Clifford Middelton
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NICE, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Louise Paquet
- Direction de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Ministère de la Santé du Québec, DLCC, Montréal, Canada
| | | | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, KCE, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Emilia Sanchez
- Agència d'Avaluació de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques, AATRM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Thierry Philip
- Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, SOR/Centre Léon Bérard, EA 4129 Santé-Individu-Société, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Delvaux N, De Sutter A, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, Fieuws S, Aertgeerts B. Electronic Laboratory Medicine ordering with evidence-based Order sets in primary care (ELMO study): protocol for a cluster randomised trial. Implement Sci 2017; 12:147. [PMID: 29212546 PMCID: PMC5719744 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0685-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laboratory testing is an important clinical act with a valuable role in screening, diagnosis, management and monitoring of diseases or therapies. However, inappropriate laboratory test ordering is frequent, burdening health care spending and negatively influencing quality of care. Inappropriate tests may also result in false-positive results and potentially cause excessive downstream activities. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have shown promising results to influence the test-ordering behaviour of physicians and to improve appropriateness. Order sets, a form of CDSS where a limited set of evidence-based tests are proposed for a series of indications, integrated in a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) have been shown to be effective in reducing the volume of ordered laboratory tests but convincing evidence that they influence appropriateness is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of order sets on the quality and quantity of laboratory test orders by physicians. We also aim to evaluate the effect of order sets on diagnostic error and explore the effect on downstream or cascade activities. METHODS We will conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial in Belgian primary care practices. The study is powered to measure two outcomes. We will primarily measure the influence of our CDSS on the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering. Additionally, we will also measure the influence on diagnostic error. We will also explore the effects of our intervention on cascade activities due to altered results of inappropriate tests. DISCUSSION We have designed a study that should be able to demonstrate whether the CDSS aimed at diagnostic testing is not only able to influence appropriateness but also safe with respect to diagnostic error. These findings will influence a lager, nationwide implementation of this CDSS. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02950142 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Delvaux
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - An De Sutter
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stijn Van de Velde
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Centre for Informed Health Choices, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steffen Fieuws
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Blok J, PB 7001, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Delvaux N, Van Thienen K, Heselmans A, de Velde SV, Ramaekers D, Aertgeerts B. The Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Laboratory Test Ordering: A Systematic Review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141:585-595. [PMID: 28353386 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0115-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT - Inappropriate laboratory test ordering has been shown to be as high as 30%. This can have an important impact on quality of care and costs because of downstream consequences such as additional diagnostics, repeat testing, imaging, prescriptions, surgeries, or hospital stays. OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the effect of computerized clinical decision support systems on appropriateness of laboratory test ordering. DATA SOURCES - We used MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Inspec through December 2015. Investigators independently screened articles to identify randomized trials that assessed a computerized clinical decision support system aimed at improving laboratory test ordering by providing patient-specific information, delivered in the form of an on-screen management option, reminder, or suggestion through a computerized physician order entry using a rule-based or algorithm-based system relying on an evidence-based knowledge resource. Investigators extracted data from 30 papers about study design, various study characteristics, study setting, various intervention characteristics, involvement of the software developers in the evaluation of the computerized clinical decision support system, outcome types, and various outcome characteristics. CONCLUSIONS - Because of heterogeneity of systems and settings, pooled estimates of effect could not be made. Data showed that computerized clinical decision support systems had little or no effect on clinical outcomes but some effect on compliance. Computerized clinical decision support systems targeted at laboratory test ordering for multiple conditions appear to be more effective than those targeted at a single condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Bert Aertgeerts
- From the Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Drs Delvaux, Heselmans, Ramaekers, and Aertgeerts).,the Department of Public Health, Vrije University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (Dr Van Thienen).,the GUIDES project, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Dr Van de Velde).,and the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBAM), Belgian Branch of the Dutch Cochrane Collaboration, Leuven, Belgium (Drs Ramaekers and Aertgeerts)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rob D, Špunda R, Lindner J, Šmalcová J, Šmíd O, Kovárník T, Linhart A, Bìlohlávek J, Marinoni MM, Cianchi G, Trapani S, Migliaccio ML, Gucci L, Bonizzoli M, Cramaro A, Cozzolino M, Valente S, Peris A, Grins E, Kort E, Weiland M, Shresta NM, Davidson P, Algotsson L, Fitch S, Marco G, Sturgill J, Lee S, Dickinson M, Boeve T, Khaghani A, Wilton P, Jovinge S, Ahmad AN, Loveridge R, Vlachos S, Patel S, Gelandt E, Morgan L, Butt S, Whitehorne M, Kakar V, Park C, Hayes M, Willars C, Hurst T, Best T, Vercueil A, Auzinger G, Adibelli B, Akovali N, Torgay A, Zeyneloglu P, Pirat A, Kayhan Z, Schmidbauer SS, Herlitz J, Karlsson T, Friberg H, Knafelj R, Radsel P, Duprez F, Bonus T, Cuvelier G, Mashayekhi S, Maka M, Ollieuz S, Reychler G, Mosaddegh R, Abbasi S, Talaee S, Zotzmann VZ, Staudacher DS, Wengenmayer TW, Dürschmied DD, Bode CB, Nelskylä A, Nurmi J, Jousi M, Schramko A, Mervaala E, Ristagno G, Skrifvars M, Ozsoy G, Kendirli T, Azapagasi E, Perk O, Gadirova U, Ozcinar E, Cakici M, Baran C, Durdu S, Uysalel A, Dogan M, Ramoglu M, Ucar T, Tutar E, Atalay S, Akar R, Kamps M, Leeuwerink G, Hofmeijer J, Hoiting O, Van der Hoeven J, Hoedemaekers C, Konkayev A, Kuklin V, Kondratyev T, Konkayeva M, Akhatov N, Sovershaev M, Tveita T, Dahl V, Wihersaari L, Skrifvars MB, Bendel S, Kaukonen KM, Vaahersalo J, Romppanen J, Pettilä V, Reinikainen M, Lybeck A, Cronberg T, Nielsen N, Friberg H, Rauber M, Steblovnik K, Jazbec A, Noc M, Kalasbail P, Garrett F, Kulstad E, Bergström DJ, Olsson HR, Schmidbauer S, Friberg H, Mandel I, Mikheev S, Podoxenov Y, Suhodolo I, Podoxenov A, Svirko J, Sementsov A, Maslov L, Shipulin V, Vammen LV, Rahbek SR, Secher NS, Povlsen JP, Jessen NJ, Løfgren BL, Granfeldt AG, Grossestreuer A, Perman S, Patel P, Ganley S, Portmann J, Cocchi M, Donnino M, Nassar Y, Fathy S, Gaber A, Mokhtar S, Chia YC, Lewis-Cuthbertson R, Mustafa K, Sabra A, Evans A, Bennett P, Eertmans W, Genbrugge C, Boer W, Dens J, De Deyne C, Jans F, Skorko A, Thomas M, Casadio M, Coppo A, Vargiolu A, Villa J, Rota M, Avalli L, Citerio G, Moon JB, Cho JH, Park CW, Ohk TG, Shin MC, Won MH, Papamichalis P, Zisopoulou V, Dardiotis E, Karagiannis S, Papadopoulos D, Zafeiridis T, Babalis D, Skoura A, Staikos I, Komnos A, Passos SS, Maeda F, Souza LS, Filho AA, Granjeia TAG, Schweller M, Franci D, De Carvalho Filho M, Santos TM, De Azevedo P, Wall R, Welters I, Tansuwannarat P, Sanguanwit P, Langer T, Carbonara M, Caccioppola A, Fusarini CF, Carlesso E, Paradiso E, Battistini M, Cattaneo E, Zadek F, Maiavacca R, Stocchetti N, Pesenti A, Ramos A, Acharta F, Toledo J, Perezlindo M, Lovesio L, Dogliotti A, Lovesio C, Schroten N, Van der Veen B, De Vries MC, Veenstra J, Abulhasan YB, Rachel S, Châtillon-Angle M, Alabdulraheem N, Schiller I, Dendukuri N, Angle M, Frenette C, Lahiri S, Schlick K, Mayer SA, Lyden P, Akatsuka M, Arakawa J, Yamakage M, Rubio J, Mateo-Sidron JAR, Sierra R, Celaya M, Benitez L, Alvarez-Ossorio S, Rubio J, Mateo-Sidron JAR, Sierra R, Fernandez A, Gonzalez O, Engquist H, Rostami E, Enblad P, Toledo J, Ramos A, Acharta F, Canullo L, Nallino J, Dogliotti A, Lovesio C, Perreault M, Talic J, Frenette AJ, Burry L, Bernard F, Williamson DR, Adukauskiene D, Cyziute J, Adukauskaite A, Malciene L, Luca L, Rogobete A, Bedreag O, Papurica M, Sarandan M, Cradigati C, Popovici S, Vernic C, Sandesc D, Avakov V, Shakhova I, Trimmel H, Majdan M, Herzer GH, Sokoloff CS, Albert M, Williamson D, Odier C, Giguère J, Charbonney E, Bernard F, Husti Z, Kaptás T, Fülep Z, Gaál Z, Tusa M, Donnelly J, Aries M, Czosnyka M, Robba C, Liu M, Ercole A, Menon D, Hutchinson P, Smielewski P, López R, Graf J, Montes JM, Kenawi M, Kandil A, Husein K, Samir A, Heijneman J, Huijben J, Abid-Ali F, Stolk M, Van Bommel J, Lingsma H, Van der Jagt M, Cihlar RC, Mancino G, Bertini P, Forfori F, Guarracino F, Pavelescu D, Grintescu I, Mirea L, Alamri S, Tharwat M, Kono N, Okamoto H, Uchino H, Ikegami T, Fukuoka T, Simoes M, Trigo E, Coutinho P, Pimentel J, Franci A, Basagni D, Boddi M, Cozzolino M, Anichini V, Cecchi A, Peris A, Markopoulou D, Venetsanou K, Papanikolaou I, Barkouri T, Chroni D, Alamanos I, Cingolani E, Bocci MG, Pisapia L, Tersali A, Cutuli SL, Fiore V, Palma A, Nardi G, Antonelli M, Coke R, Kwong A, Dwivedi DJ, Xu M, McDonald E, Marshall JC, Fox-Robichaud AE, Charbonney E, Liaw PC, Kuchynska I, Malysh IR, Zgrzheblovska LV, Mestdagh L, Verhoeven EF, Hubloue I, Ruel-laliberte J, Zarychanski R, Lauzier F, Bonaventure PL, Green R, Griesdale D, Fowler R, Kramer A, Zygun D, Walsh T, Stanworth S, Léger C, Turgeon AF, Baron DM, Baron-Stefaniak J, Leitner GC, Ullrich R, Tarabrin O, Mazurenko A, Potapchuk Y, Sazhyn D, Tarabrin P, Tarabrin O, Mazurenko A, Potapchuk Y, Sazhyn D, Tarabrin P, Pérez AG, Silva J, Artemenko V, Bugaev A, Tokar I, Konashevskaya S, Kolesnikova IM, Roitman EV, Kiss TR, Máthé Z, Piros L, Dinya E, Tihanyi E, Smudla A, Fazakas J, Ubbink R, Boekhorst te P, Mik E, Caneva L, Ticozzelli G, Pirrelli S, Passador D, Riccardi F, Ferrari F, Roldi EM, Di Matteo M, Bianchi I, Iotti GA, Zurauskaite G, Voegeli A, Meier M, Koch D, Haubitz S, Kutz A, Bargetzi M, Mueller B, Schuetz P, Von Meijenfeldt G, Van der Laan M, Zeebregts C, Christopher KB, Vernikos P, Melissopoulou T, Kanellopoulou G, Panoutsopoulou M, Xanthis D, Kolovou K, Kypraiou T, Floros J, Broady H, Pritchett C, Marshman M, Jannaway N, Ralph C, Lehane CL, Keyl CK, Zimmer EZ, Trenk DT, Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Jonard MJ, Fourrier F, Piza F, Correa T, Marra A, Guerra J, Rodrigues R, Vilarinho A, Aranda V, Shiramizo S, Lima MR, Kallas E, Cavalcanti AB, Donoso M, Vargas P, Graf J, McCartney J, Ramsay S, McDowall K, Novitzky-Basso I, Wright C, Medic MG, Bielen L, Radonic V, Zlopasa O, Vrdoljak NG, Gasparovic V, Radonic R, Narváez G, Cabestrero D, Rey L, Aroca M, Gallego S, Higuera J, De Pablo R, González LR, Chávez GN, Lucas JH, Alonso DC, Ruiz MA, Valarezo LJ, De Pablo Sánchez R, Real AQ, Wigmore TW, Bendavid I, Cohen J, Avisar I, Serov I, Kagan I, Singer P, Hanison J, Mirza U, Conway D, Takasu A, Tanaka H, Otani N, Ohde S, Ishimatsu S, Coffey F, Dissmann P, Mirza K, Lomax M, Dissmann P, Coffey F, Mirza K, Lomax M, Miner JR, Leto R, Markota AM, Gradišek PG, Aleksejev VA, Sinkovič AS, Romagnoli S, Chelazzi C, Zagli G, Benvenuti F, Mancinelli P, Boninsegni P, Paparella L, Bos AT, Thomas O, Goslar T, Knafelj R, Perreault M, Martone A, Sandu PR, Rosu VA, Capilnean A, Murgoi P, Frenette AJ, Lecavalier A, Jayaraman D, Rico P, Bellemare P, Gelinas C, Williamson D, Nishida T, Kinoshita T, Iwata N, Yamakawa K, Fujimi S, Maggi L, Sposato F, Citterio G, Bonarrigo C, Rocco M, Zani V, De Blasi RA, Alcorn D, Barry L, Riedijk MA, Milstein DM, Caldas J, Panerai R, Camara L, Ferreira G, Bor-Seng-Shu E, Lima M, Galas F, Mian N, Nogueira R, de Oliveira GQ, Almeida J, Jardim J, Robinson TG, Gaioto F, Hajjar LA, Zabolotskikh I, Musaeva T, Saasouh W, Freeman J, Turan A, Saseedharan S, Pathrose E, Poojary S, Messika J, Martin Y, Maquigneau N, Henry-Lagarrigue M, Puechberty C, Stoclin A, Martin-Lefevre L, Blot F, Dreyfuss D, Dechanet A, Hajage D, Ricard J, Almeida E, Almeida J, Landoni G, Galas F, Fukushima J, Fominskiy E, De Brito C, Cavichio L, Almeida L, Ribeiro U, Osawa E, Boltes R, Battistella L, Hajjar L, Fontela P, Lisboa T, Junior LF, Friedman GF, Abruzzi F, Primo JAP, Filho PM, de Andrade JS, Brenner KM, boeira MS, Leães C, Rodrigues C, Vessozi A, Machado AS, Weiler M, Bryce H, Hudson A, Law T, Reece-Anthony R, Molokhia A, Abtahinezhadmoghaddam F, Cumber E, Channon L, Wong A, Groome R, Gearon D, Varley J, Wilson A, Reading J, Wong A, Zampieri FG, Bozza FA, Ferez M, Fernandes H, Japiassú A, Verdeal J, Carvalho AC, Knibel M, Salluh JI, Soares M, Gao J, Ahmadnia E, Patel B, McCartney J, MacKay A, Binning S, Wright C, Pugh RJ, Battle C, Hancock C, Harrison W, Szakmany T, Mulders F, Vandenbrande J, Dubois J, Stessel B, Siborgs K, Ramaekers D, Soares M, Silva UV, Homena WS, Fernandes GC, Moraes AP, Brauer L, Lima MF, De Marco F, Bozza FA, Salluh JI, Maric N, Mackovic M, Udiljak N, Bosso CE, Caetano RD, Cardoso AP, Souza OA, Pena R, Mescolotte MM, Souza IA, Mescolotte GM, Bangalore H, Borrows E, Barnes D, Ferreira V, Azevedo L, Alencar G, Andrade A, Bierrenbach A, Buoninsegni LT, Bonizzoli M, Cecci L, Cozzolino M, Peris A, Lindskog J, Rowland K, Sturgess P, Ankuli A, Molokhia A, Rosa R, Tonietto T, Ascoli A, Madeira L, Rutzen W, Falavigna M, Robinson C, Salluh J, Cavalcanti A, Azevedo L, Cremonese R, Da Silva D, Dornelles A, Skrobik Y, Teles J, Ribeiro T, Eugênio C, Teixeira C, Zarei M, Hashemizadeh H, Eriksson M, Strandberg G, Lipcsey M, Larsson A, Lignos M, Crissanthopoulou E, Flevari K, Dimopoulos P, Armaganidis A, Golub JG, Markota AM, Stožer AS, Sinkovič AS, Rüddel H, Ehrlich C, Burghold CM, Hohenstein C, Winning J, Sellami W, Hajjej Z, Bousselmi M, Gharsallah H, Labbene I, Ferjani M, Sattler J, Steinbrunner D, Poppert H, Schneider G, Blobner M, Kanz KG, Schaller SJ, Apap K, Xuereb G, Xuereb G, Apap K, Massa L, Xuereb G, Apap K, Massa L, Delvau N, Penaloza A, Liistro G, Thys F, Delattre IK, Hantson P, Roy PM, Gianello P, Hadîrcă L, Ghidirimschi A, Catanoi N, Scurtov N, Bagrinovschi M, Sohn YS, Cho YC, Golovin B, Creciun O, Ghidirimschi A, Bagrinovschi M, Tabbara R, Whitgift JZ, Ishimaru A, Yaguchi A, Akiduki N, Namiki M, Takeda M, Tamminen JN, Reinikainen M, Uusaro A, Taylor CG, Mills ED, Mackay AD, Ponzoni C, Rabello R, Serpa A, Assunção M, Pardini A, Shettino G, Corrêa T, Vidal-Cortés PV, Álvarez-Rocha L, Fernández-Ugidos P, Virgós-Pedreira A, Pérez-Veloso MA, Suárez-Paul IM, Del Río-Carbajo L, Fernández SP, Castro-Iglesias A, Butt A, Alghabban AA, Khurshid SK, Ali ZA, Nizami IN, Salahuddin NS, Alshahrani M, Alsubaie AW, Alshamsy AS, Alkhiliwi BA, Alshammari HK, Alshammari MB, Telmesani NK, Alshammari RB, Asonto LP, Zampieri FG, Damiani LP, Bozza F, Salluh JI, Cavalcanti AB, El Khattate A, Bizrane M, Madani N, Belayachi J, Abouqal R, Ramnarain D, Gouw-Donders B, Benstoem C, Moza A, Meybohm P, Stoppe C, Autschbach R, Devane D, Goetzenich A, Taniguchi LU, Araujo L, Salgado G, Vieira JM, Viana J, Ziviani N, Pessach I, Lipsky A, Nimrod A, O´Connor M, Matot I, Segal E, Kluzik A, Gradys A, Smuszkiewicz P, Trojanowska I, Cybulski M, De Jong A, Sebbane M, Chanques G, Jaber S, Rosa R, Robinson C, Bessel M, Cavalheiro L, Madeira L, Rutzen W, Oliveira R, Maccari J, Falavigna M, Sanchez E, Dutra F, Dietrich C, Balzano P, Rezende J, Teixeira C, Sinha S, Majhi K, Gorlicki JG, Pousset FP, Kelly J, Aron J, Gilbert AC, Urankar NP, Knafelj R, Irazabal M, Bosque M, Manciño J, Kotsopoulos A, Jansen N, Abdo W, Casey ÚM, O’Brien B, Plant R, Doyle B. 37th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (part 2 of 3). Crit Care 2017. [PMCID: PMC5374552 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1630-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
15
|
Odnoletkova I, Buysse H, Nobels F, Goderis G, Aertgeerts B, Annemans L, Ramaekers D. Patient and provider acceptance of telecoaching in type 2 diabetes: a mixed-method study embedded in a randomised clinical trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016; 16:142. [PMID: 27825340 PMCID: PMC5101679 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0383-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes, suboptimal metabolic control persists. Patient education in diabetes has been proved to enhance self-efficacy and guideline-driven treatment, however many people with type 2 diabetes do not have access to or do not participate in self-management support programmes. Tele-education and telecoaching have the potential to improve accessibility and efficiency of care, but there is a slow uptake in Europe. Patient and provider acceptance in a local context is an important pre-condition for implementation. The aim of the study was to explore the perceptions of patients, nurses and general practitioners (GPs) regarding telecoaching in type 2 diabetes. Methods Mixed-method study embedded in a clinical trial, in which a nurse-led target-driven telecoaching programme consisting of 5 monthly telephone sessions of +/− 30 min was offered to 287 people with type 2 diabetes in Belgian primary care. Intervention attendance and satisfaction about the programme were analysed along with qualitative data obtained during post-trial semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, general practitioners (GPs) and nurses. The perceptions of patients and care providers about the intervention were coded and the themes interpreted as barriers or facilitators for adoption. Results Of 252 patients available for a follow-up analysis, 97.5 % reported being satisfied. Interviews were held with 16 patients, 17 general practitioners (GPs) and all nurses involved (n = 6). Themes associated with adoption facilitation were: 1) improved diabetes control; 2) need for more tailored patient education programmes offered from the moment of diagnosis; 3) comfort and flexibility; 4) evidence-based nature of the programme; 5) established cooperation between GPs and diabetes educators; and 6) efficiency gains. Most potential barriers were derived from the provider views: 1) poor patient motivation and suboptimal compliance with “faceless” advice; 2) GPs’ reluctance in the area of patient referral and information sharing; 3) lack of legal, organisational and financial framework for telecare. Conclusions Nurse-led telecoaching of people with type 2 diabetes was well-accepted by patients and providers, with providers being in general more critical in their reflections. With increasing patient demand for mobile and remote services in healthcare, the findings of this study should support professionals involved in healthcare policy and innovation. Trial registration NCT01612520, registered prior to recruitment on 4th June 2012. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0383-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Odnoletkova
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
| | - H Buysse
- Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 4K3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - F Nobels
- Department of Endocrinology, OLV Hospital Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9300, Aalst, Belgium
| | - G Goderis
- Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | - B Aertgeerts
- Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | - L Annemans
- Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 4K3, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Ramaekers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Odnoletkova I, Ramaekers D, Nobels F, Goderis G, Aertgeerts B, Annemans L. Delivering Diabetes Education through Nurse-Led Telecoaching. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0163997. [PMID: 27727281 PMCID: PMC5058491 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with diabetes have a high risk of developing micro- and macrovascular complications associated with diminished life expectancy and elevated treatment costs. Patient education programs can improve diabetes control in the short term, but their cost-effectiveness is uncertain. Our study aimed to analyze the lifelong cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led telecoaching program compared to usual care in people with type 2 diabetes from the perspective of the Belgian healthcare system. METHODS The UKPDS Outcomes Model was populated with patient-level data from an 18-month randomized clinical trial in the Belgian primary care sector involving 574 participants; trial data were extrapolated to 40 years; Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), treatment costs and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) were calculated for the entire cohort and the subgroup with poor glycemic control at baseline ("elevated HbA1c subgroup") and the associated uncertainty was explored. RESULTS The cumulative mean QALY (95% CI) gain was 0.21 (0.13; 0.28) overall and 0.56 (0.43; 0.68) in elevated HbA1c subgroup; the respective incremental costs were €1,147 (188; 2,107) and €2,565 (654; 4,474) and the respective ICERs €5,569 (€677; €15,679) and €4,615 (1,207; 9,969) per QALY. In the scenario analysis, repeating the intervention for lifetime had the greatest impact on the cost-effectiveness and resulted in the mean ICERs of €13,034 in the entire cohort and €7,858 in the elevated HbA1c subgroup. CONCLUSION Taking into account reimbursement thresholds applied in West-European countries, nurse-led telecoaching of people with type 2 diabetes may be considered highly cost-effective within the Belgian healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01612520.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frank Nobels
- Department of Endocrinology, OLV Hospital Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Geert Goderis
- Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieven Annemans
- Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Odnoletkova I, Goderis G, Nobels F, Fieuws S, Aertgeerts B, Annemans L, Ramaekers D. Optimizing diabetes control in people with Type 2 diabetes through nurse-led telecoaching. Diabet Med 2016; 33:777-85. [PMID: 26872105 DOI: 10.1111/dme.13092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To study the effect of a target-driven telecoaching intervention on HbA1c and other modifiable risk factors in people with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial in patients receiving hypoglycaemic agents. The primary outcome was HbA1c level at 6 months in the entire sample and in a subgroup with HbA1c levels ≥ 53 mmol/mol (7%) at baseline. Secondary outcomes were HbA1c at 18 months; total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, blood pressure, BMI and proportion of people who had achieved guideline-recommended targets at 6 and 18 months. RESULTS A total of 287 participants were randomized to telecoaching and 287 to usual care. The mean (sd) baseline HbA1c level was 53 (11) mmol/mol [7.0 (1.0)%] overall and 63 (10) mmol/mol [7.9 (0.9)%] in the elevated HbA1c subgroup. At 6 months, the between-group differences in favour of telecoaching were: HbA1c -2 (95% CI -4; -1) mmol/mol [-0.2 (95% CI -0.3;-0.1)%; P=0.003] overall and -4 (95% CI -7; -2) mmol/mol [-0.4 (95% CI -0.7; -0.2)%; P=0.001] in the elevated HbA1c subgroup; BMI -0.4 kg/m(2) (95% CI -0.6; -0.1; P=0.003); total cholesterol -6 mg/dl (95% CI -11; -1, P=0.012). The proportion of participants on target for the composite of HbA1c , LDL and blood pressure increased by 8.9% in the intervention group and decreased by 1.3% in the control group (P=0.011). At 18 months, the difference in HbA1c was: -2 (95% CI -3;-0) mmol/mol [-0.2 (95% CI -0.3; -0.0)%; P=0.046] overall and -4 (-7; -1) mmol/mol [-0.4 (95% CI -0.7; -0.1)%; P=0.023] in the elevated HbA1c subgroup. CONCLUSION Nurse-led telecoaching improved glycaemic control, total cholesterol levels and BMI in people with Type 2 diabetes. Twelve months after the intervention completion, there were sustained improvements in glycaemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Odnoletkova
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Goderis
- Academic Centre for General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Nobels
- Department of Endocrinology, OLV Hospital Aalst, Moorselbaan, Aalst, Belgium
| | - S Fieuws
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, University of Leuven and University of Hasselt, Leuven, Belgium
| | - B Aertgeerts
- Academic Centre for General Practice, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Annemans
- Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Ramaekers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Roels EH, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D, Peers K. Hospital- and community-based interventions enhancing (re)employment for people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 2015; 54:2-7. [PMID: 26305872 DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2014] [Revised: 05/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic Review. OBJECTIVES To investigate the effect of interventions enhancing (re)employment following spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING Studies from multiple countries were included. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, PsycINFO and SPORTDISCUS databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) describing a hospital- or a community-based intervention aiming at employment in a SCI population were selected. Quality appraisal was done using the SIGN methodology, and the quality of evidence was graded using the Grade approach. Data extraction was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook. Employment rate and duration were primary outcomes. RESULTS Only one RCT, including 201 patients describing an intervention over 1 and 2 years, was of sufficient quality. In this study, the employment rate was 26% after 1 and 31% after 2 years for competitive work, compared with 10% in the treatment as usual-intervention site (TAU-IS) control group and 2% in the treatment as usual observational site (TAU-OS) after 1 and 2 years. Other studies were of low quality and describe higher employment rates from 36 to 100%. CONCLUSIONS Only one RCT was of sufficient quality and showed evidence that a vocational rehabilitation programme based on the principles of supported employment integrated in a multidisciplinary team enhances employment for SCI people. As the vast majority of studies included in this review are of low methodological quality, further research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E H Roels
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - B Aertgeerts
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center of General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Ramaekers
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Peers
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Heselmans A, van Krieken J, Cootjans S, Nagels K, Filliers D, Dillen K, De Broe S, Ramaekers D. Medication review by a clinical pharmacist at the transfer point from ICU to ward: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Pharm Ther 2015; 40:578-583. [PMID: 29188903 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2015] [Accepted: 07/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Drug-related problems (DRPs) occur frequently in hospitalized patients. Patient discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a non-ICU ward is one of the most challenging and high-risk transitions of care due to the number of medications, and the complexity and acuity of the medical conditions that characterize this patient group. Pharmacists could play an important role in preventing DRPs. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact on the number and severity of drug-related problems by assigning a clinical pharmacist to the transfer process from ICU to wards. METHODS The study was a randomized controlled multicentre trial conducted at the Hospital Network of Antwerp between December 2010 and January 2012. The clinical pharmacist performed a medical review in both the intervention and control group. Recommendations for drug therapy changes were immediately communicated in the intervention group but were kept blinded in the control group. The primary outcome was expressed as the number of implemented recommendations for drug therapy changes. Differences between groups were calculated using mixed effects binary logistic regression. RESULTS Drug-related problems were found in the medical records of 360 of the 600 participants (60%). A total of 743 recommendations could be made, 375 in the intervention group and 368 in the control group. 54·1% of these problems were adjusted on time in the intervention group vs. 12·8% in the control group. Of 743 recommendations, 24·8% were judged by the expert group as major, 13·1% as moderate, 53.4% as minor and 8·9% as having no clinical impact. The odds of implementing recommendations of drug therapy changes in the intervention group were 10 times the odds of implementing recommendations of drug therapy changes in the control group (odds ratio = 10·1; 95%CI [6·3-16·1]; P < 0·001), even after accounting for differences in types of DRP between the groups (odds ratio = 15·6; 95%CI [9·4-25·9]; P < 0·001). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION The integration of a clinical pharmacist at the transfer point from ICU to ward led to a significant reduction in DRPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Heselmans
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - J van Krieken
- AZ Sint Maarten General Hospital, Hospital Pharmacy, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - S Cootjans
- ZNA Antwerp Hospital Network, Hospital Pharmacy, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - K Nagels
- ZNA Antwerp Hospital Network, Hospital Pharmacy, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - D Filliers
- ZNA Antwerp Hospital Network, Hospital Pharmacy, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - K Dillen
- ZNA Antwerp Hospital Network, Hospital Pharmacy, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - S De Broe
- ZNA Antwerp Hospital Network, Hospital Pharmacy, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - D Ramaekers
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Odnoletkova I, Annemans L, Ceuppens A, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D. Health Care Costs in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Flanders Based on A Combination of Clinical And Health Insurance Data. Value Health 2014; 17:A341. [PMID: 27200629 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - L Annemans
- Ghent University & Brussels University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - A Ceuppens
- Independant Health Insurance Fund, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Odnoletkova I, Goderis G, Nobels F, Aertgeerts B, Annemans L, Ramaekers D. Nurse-led telecoaching of people with type 2 diabetes in primary care: rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2014; 15:24. [PMID: 24495633 PMCID: PMC3922086 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2013] [Accepted: 12/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the efforts of the healthcare community to improve the quality of diabetes care, about 50% of people with type 2 diabetes do not reach their treatment targets, increasing the risk of future micro-and macro-vascular complications. Diabetes self-management education has been shown to contribute to better disease control. However, it is not known which strategies involving educational programs are cost-effective. Telehealth applications might support chronic disease management. Transferability of successful distant patient self-management support programs to the Belgian setting needs to be confirmed by studies of a high methodological quality. "The COACH Program" was developed in Australia as target driven educational telephone delivered intervention to support people with different chronic conditions. It proved to be effective in patients with coronary heart disease after hospitalization. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of The COACH Program in people with type 2 diabetes in Belgium needs to be assessed. METHODS/DESIGN Randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were selected based on their medication consumption data and were recruited by their sickness fund. They were randomized to receive either usual care plus "The COACH Program" or usual care alone. The study will assess the difference in outcomes between groups. The primary outcome measure is the level of HbA1c. The secondary outcomes are: Total Cholesterol, LDL-Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Blood Pressure, body mass index, smoking status; proportion of people at target for HbA1c, LDL-Cholesterol and Blood Pressure; self-perceived health status, diabetes-specific emotional distress and satisfaction with diabetes care. The follow-up period is 18 months. Within-trial and modeled cost-utility analyses, to project effects over life-time horizon beyond the trial duration, will be undertaken from the perspective of the health care system if the intervention is effective. DISCUSSION The study will enhance our understanding of the potential of telehealth in diabetes management in Belgium. Research on the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness is essential to support policy makers in future reimbursement and implementation decisions.
Collapse
|
22
|
Hoogmartens O, Heselmans A, Van de Velde S, Castrén M, Sjölin H, Sabbe M, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D. Evidence-based prehospital management of severe traumatic brain injury: a comparative analysis of current clinical practice guidelines. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2014; 18:265-73. [PMID: 24401184 DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2013.856506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study appraised the completeness and level of evidence behind prehospital recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Differences and similarities in key recommendations for prehospital emergency care were assessed between current CPGs. METHODS A systematic search identified current evidence-based CPGs for the management of severe TBI. The identified CPGs were screened for prehospital recommendations. Finally, an evaluation of the completeness and level of evidence for each of the identified recommendations was carried out. A review of the literature identified additional evidence. Designs of the retrieved publications were considered and classified according to the GRADE levels of evidence. RESULTS This study identified 12 current CPGs for the management of patients after traumatic brain injury. Of these, twenty-one prehospital recommendations were selected. Only a few CPGs made recommendations on temperature management and ventilation patterns. Statements on prehospital transport and advanced airway management were common to all of the guidelines. Statements on initial treatment demonstrated the greatest variability. The literature review identified several relevant publications not included in the CPGs even after we controlled for the indicated time-intervals of their literature search. In addition, evidence from more recent trials published outside the search-interval of the clinical practice guidelines was found. CONCLUSIONS The use of current guidelines on traumatic brain injury will not always facilitate decisions about best or most appropriate practice for prehospital practitioners. The amount of recommended prehospital interventions varied considerably, and there was large content variation in prehospital recommendations in these guidelines. Not all evidence was taken into account and not all CPGs were up-to-date.
Collapse
|
23
|
Van Herck P, Annemans L, Sermeus W, Ramaekers D. Evidence-based health care policy in reimbursement decisions: lessons from a series of six equivocal case-studies. PLoS One 2013; 8:e78662. [PMID: 24205290 PMCID: PMC3813690 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2012] [Accepted: 09/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Health care technological evolution through new drugs, implants and other interventions is a key driver of healthcare spending. Policy makers are currently challenged to strengthen the evidence for and cost-effectiveness of reimbursement decisions, while not reducing the capacity for real innovations. This article examines six cases of reimbursement decision making at the national health insurance authority in Belgium, with outcomes that were contested from an evidence-based perspective in scientific or public media. Methods In depth interviews with key stakeholders based on the adapted framework of Davies allowed us to identify the relative impact of clinical and health economic evidence; experience, expertise & judgment; financial impact & resources; values, ideology & political beliefs; habit & tradition; lobbyists & pressure groups; pragmatics & contingencies; media attention; and adoption from other payers & countries. Findings Evidence was not the sole criterion on which reimbursement decisions were based. Across six equivocal cases numerous other criteria were perceived to influence reimbursement policy. These included other considerations that stakeholders deemed crucial in this area, such as taking into account the cost to the patient, and managing crisis scenarios. However, negative impacts were also reported, in the form of bypassing regular procedures unnecessarily, dominance of an opinion leader, using information selectively, and influential conflicts of interest. Conclusions ‘Evidence’ and ‘negotiation’ are both essential inputs of reimbursement policy. Yet, purposely selected equivocal cases in Belgium provide a rich source to learn from and to improve the interaction between both. We formulated policy recommendations to reconcile the impact of all factors identified. A more systematic approach to reimburse new care may be one of many instruments to resolve the budgetary crisis in health care in other countries as well, by separating what is truly innovative and value for money from additional ‘waste’.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Van Herck
- Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- * E-mail:
| | - Lieven Annemans
- Department of Public Health, I-CHER, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Walter Sermeus
- Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Ramaekers
- Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Heselmans A, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, Vander Stichele R, Aertgeerts B. Feasibility and impact of an evidence-based electronic decision support system for diabetes care in family medicine: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci 2013; 8:83. [PMID: 23915250 PMCID: PMC3751256 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-83] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Accepted: 07/31/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Belgium, the construction of the national electronic point-of-care information service, EBMPracticeNet, was initiated in 2011 to optimize quality of care by promoting evidence-based decision-making. The collaboration of the government, healthcare providers, Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) partners, and vendors of Electronic Health Records (EHR) is unique to this project. All Belgian healthcare professionals get free access to an up-to-date database of validated Belgian and nearly 1,000 international guidelines, incorporated in a portal that also provides EBM information from sources other than guidelines, including computerized clinical decision support that is integrated in the EHRs. The EBMeDS system is the electronic evidence-based decision support system of EBMPracticeNet. The EBMeDS system covers all clinical areas of diseases and could play a crucial role in response to the emerging challenge posed by chronic conditions. Diabetes was chosen as the analysis topic of interest. The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of EBMeDS use in improving diabetes care. This objective will be enhanced by a formal process evaluation to provide crucial information on the feasibility of using the system in daily Belgian family medicine. Methods The study is a cluster-randomized trial with before/after measurements conducted in Belgian family medicine. Physicians’ practices will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control group in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either the EBMeDS reminders or to follow the usual care process. Randomization will be performed by a statistical consultant with an electronic random list generator, anonymously for the researchers. The follow-up period of the study will be 12 months with interim analysis points at 3, 6 and 9 months. Primary outcome is the one-year pre- to post-implementation change in HbA1c. Patients will not be informed about the intervention. Data analysts will be kept blinded to the allocation. Discussion The knowledge obtained in this study will be useful for further integration in other Belgian software packages. Users’ perceptions and process evaluation will provide information for improving the feasibility of the system. Trial registration The trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT01830569.
Collapse
|
25
|
Van de Velde S, Vander Stichele R, Fauquert B, Geens S, Heselmans A, Ramaekers D, Kunnamo I, Aertgeerts B. EBMPracticeNet: A Bilingual National Electronic Point-Of-Care Project for Retrieval of Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Information and Decision Support. JMIR Res Protoc 2013; 2:e23. [PMID: 23842038 PMCID: PMC3713937 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.2644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2013] [Accepted: 06/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Belgium, the construction of a national electronic point-of-care information service, EBMPracticeNet, was initiated in 2011 to optimize quality of care by promoting evidence-based decision-making. The collaboration of the government, health care providers, evidence-based medicine (EBM) partners, and vendors of electronic health records (EHR) is unique to this project. All Belgian health care professionals get free access to an up-to-date database of validated Belgian and nearly 1000 international guidelines, incorporated in a portal that also provides EBM information from other sources than guidelines, including computerized clinical decision support that is integrated in the EHRs. OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper was to describe the development strategy, the overall content, and the management of EBMPracticeNet which may be of relevance to other health organizations creating national or regional electronic point-of-care information services. METHODS Several candidate providers of comprehensive guideline solutions were evaluated and one database was selected. Translation of the guidelines to Dutch and French was done with translation software, post-editing by translators and medical proofreading. A strategy is determined to adapt the guideline content to the Belgian context. Acceptance of the computerized clinical decision support tool has been tested and a randomized controlled trial is planned to evaluate the effect on process and patient outcomes. RESULTS Currently, EBMPracticeNet is in "work in progress" state. Reference is made to the results of a pilot study and to further planned research including a randomized controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS The collaboration of government, health care providers, EBM partners, and vendors of EHRs is unique. The potential value of the project is great. The link between all the EHRs from different vendors and a national database held on a single platform that is controlled by all EBM organizations in Belgium are the strengths of EBMPracticeNet.
Collapse
|
26
|
Heselmans A, Aertgeerts B, Donceel P, Van de Velde S, Vanbrabant P, Ramaekers D. Human computation as a new method for evidence-based knowledge transfer in Web-based guideline development groups: proof of concept randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15:e8. [PMID: 23328663 PMCID: PMC3636290 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2012] [Revised: 07/13/2012] [Accepted: 09/23/2012] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guideline developers use different consensus methods to develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Previous research suggests that existing guideline development techniques are subject to methodological problems and are logistically demanding. Guideline developers welcome new methods that facilitate a methodologically sound decision-making process. Systems that aggregate knowledge while participants play a game are one class of human computation applications. Researchers have already proven that these games with a purpose are effective in building common sense knowledge databases. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a new consensus method based on human computation techniques compared to an informal face-to-face consensus method. METHODS We set up a randomized design to study 2 different methods for guideline development within a group of advanced students completing a master of nursing and obstetrics. Students who participated in the trial were enrolled in an evidence-based health care course. We compared the Web-based method of human-based computation (HC) with an informal face-to-face consensus method (IC). We used 4 clinical scenarios of lower back pain as the subject of the consensus process. These scenarios concerned the following topics: (1) medical imaging, (2) therapeutic options, (3) drugs use, and (4) sick leave. Outcomes were expressed as the amount of group (dis)agreement and the concordance of answers with clinical evidence. We estimated within-group and between-group effect sizes by calculating Cohen's d. We calculated within-group effect sizes as the absolute difference between the outcome value at round 3 and the baseline outcome value, divided by the pooled standard deviation. We calculated between-group effect sizes as the absolute difference between the mean change in outcome value across rounds in HC and the mean change in outcome value across rounds in IC, divided by the pooled standard deviation. We analyzed statistical significance of within-group changes between round 1 and round 3 using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. We assessed the differences between the HC and IC groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. We used a Bonferroni adjusted alpha level of .025 in all statistical tests. We performed a thematic analysis to explore participants' arguments during group discussion. Participants completed a satisfaction survey at the end of the consensus process. RESULTS Of the 135 students completing a master of nursing and obstetrics, 120 participated in the experiment. We formed 8 HC groups (n=64) and 7 IC groups (n=56). The between-group comparison demonstrated that the human computation groups obtained a greater improvement in evidence scores compared to the IC groups, although the difference was not statistically significant. The between-group effect size was 0.56 (P=.30) for the medical imaging scenario, 0.07 (P=.97) for the therapeutic options scenario, and 0.89 (P=.11) for the drug use scenario. We found no significant differences in improvement in the degree of agreement between HC and IC groups. Between-group comparisons revealed that the HC groups showed greater improvement in degree of agreement for the medical imaging scenario (d=0.46, P=.37) and the drug use scenario (d=0.31, P=.59). Very few evidence arguments (6%) were quoted during informal group discussions. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the use of the IC method was appropriate as long as the evidence supported participants' beliefs or usual practice, or when the availability of the evidence was sparse. However, when some controversy about the evidence existed, the HC method outperformed the IC method. The findings of our study illustrate the importance of the choice of the consensus method in guideline development. Human computation could be an acceptable methodology for guideline development specifically for scenarios in which the evidence shows no resonance with participants' beliefs. Future research is needed to confirm the results of this study and to establish practical significance in a controlled setting of multidisciplinary guideline panels during real-life guideline development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemie Heselmans
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Van de Velde S, Roex A, Vangronsveld K, Niezink L, Van Praet K, Heselmans A, Donceel P, Vandekerckhove P, Ramaekers D, Aertgeerts B. Can training improve laypersons helping behaviour in first aid? A randomised controlled deception trial. Emerg Med J 2012; 30:292-7. [PMID: 22562070 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence indicating that laypersons trained in first aid provide better help, but do not help more often than untrained laypersons. This study investigated the effect of conventional first aid training versus conventional training plus supplementary training aimed at decreasing barriers to helping. METHODS The authors conducted a randomised controlled trial. After 24 h of conventional first aid training, the participants either attended an experimental lesson to reduce barriers to helping or followed a control lesson. The authors used a deception test to measure the time between the start of the unannounced simulated emergency and seeking help behaviour and the number of particular helping actions. RESULTS The authors randomised 72 participants to both groups. 22 participants were included in the analysis for the experimental group and 36 in the control group. The authors found no statistically or clinically significant differences for any of the outcome measures. The time until seeking help (geometrical mean and 95% CI) was 55.5 s (42.9 to 72.0) in the experimental group and 56.5 s (43.0 to 74.3) in the control group. 57% of the participants asked a bystander to seek help, 40% left the victim to seek help themselves and 3% did not seek any help. CONCLUSION Supplementary training on dealing with barriers to helping did not alter the helping behaviour. The timing and appropriateness of the aid provided can be improved. TRIAL REGISTRATION The authors registered this trial at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00954161.
Collapse
|
28
|
Van de Velde S, Heselmans A, Donceel P, Vandekerckhove P, Ramaekers D, Aertgeerts B. Rigour of development does not AGREE with recommendations in practice guidelines on the use of ice for acute ankle sprains. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20:747-55. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
29
|
Heselmans A, Van de Velde S, Donceel P, Aertgeerts B, Ramaekers D. Effectiveness of electronic guideline-based implementation systems in ambulatory care settings - a systematic review. Implement Sci 2009; 4:82. [PMID: 20042070 PMCID: PMC2806389 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-82] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2009] [Accepted: 12/30/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Electronic guideline-based decision support systems have been suggested to successfully deliver the knowledge embedded in clinical practice guidelines. A number of studies have already shown positive findings for decision support systems such as drug-dosing systems and computer-generated reminder systems for preventive care services. Methods A systematic literature search (1990 to December 2008) of the English literature indexed in the Medline database, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CRD (DARE, HTA and NHS EED databases) was conducted to identify evaluation studies of electronic multi-step guideline implementation systems in ambulatory care settings. Important inclusion criterions were the multidimensionality of the guideline (the guideline needed to consist of several aspects or steps) and real-time interaction with the system during consultation. Clinical decision support systems such as one-time reminders for preventive care for which positive findings were shown in earlier reviews were excluded. Two comparisons were considered: electronic multidimensional guidelines versus usual care (comparison one) and electronic multidimensional guidelines versus other guideline implementation methods (comparison two). Results Twenty-seven publications were selected for analysis in this systematic review. Most designs were cluster randomized controlled trials investigating process outcomes more than patient outcomes. With success defined as at least 50% of the outcome variables being significant, none of the studies were successful in improving patient outcomes. Only seven of seventeen studies that investigated process outcomes showed improvements in process of care variables compared with the usual care group (comparison one). No incremental effect of the electronic implementation over the distribution of paper versions of the guideline was found, neither for the patient outcomes nor for the process outcomes (comparison two). Conclusions There is little evidence at the moment for the effectiveness of an increasingly used and commercialised instrument such as electronic multidimensional guidelines. After more than a decade of development of numerous electronic systems, research on the most effective implementation strategy for this kind of guideline-based decision support systems is still lacking. This conclusion implies a considerable risk towards inappropriate investments in ineffective implementation interventions and in suboptimal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemie Heselmans
- School of Public Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok d, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heselmans A, Donceel P, Aertgeerts B, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D. The attitude of Belgian social insurance physicians towards evidence-based practice and clinical practice guidelines. BMC Fam Pract 2009; 10:64. [PMID: 19740436 PMCID: PMC2745368 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2008] [Accepted: 09/09/2009] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Evidence-based medicine has broadened its scope and is starting to reach insurance medicine. Although still in its initial stages, physicians in the area of insurance medicine should keep up-to-date with the evidence on various diseases in order to correctly assess disability and to give appropriate advice about health care reimbursement. In order to explore future opportunities of evidence-based medicine to improve daily insurance medicine, there is a need for qualitative studies to better understand insurance physicians' perceptions of EBM. The present study was designed to identify the attitude of insurance physicians towards evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines, and to determine their ability to access, retrieve and appraise the health evidence and the barriers for applying evidence to practice. Methods A cross-sectional survey study was carried out among all Dutch-speaking insurance physicians employed at one of the six Belgian social insurance sickness funds and at the National Institute of Disability and Health care Insurance (n = 224). Chi-square tests were used to compare nominal and ordinal variables. Student's t-tests, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis were used to compare means of continuous variables for different groups. Results The response rate was 48.7%. The majority of respondents were positive towards evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines. Their knowledge of EBM was rather poor. Perceived barriers for applying evidence to practice were mainly time and lack of EBM skills. Conclusion Although the majority of physicians were positive towards EBM and welcomed more guidelines, the use of evidence and clinical practice guidelines in insurance medicine is low at present. It is in the first place important to eradicate the perceived inertia which limits the use of EBM and to further investigate the EBM principles in the context of insurance medicine. Available high-quality evidence-based resources (at the moment mainly originating from other medical fields) need to be structured in a way that is useful for insurance physicians and global access to this information needs to be ensured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemie Heselmans
- School of Public Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Van de Velde S, Heselmans A, Roex A, Vandekerckhove P, Ramaekers D, Aertgeerts B. Effectiveness of Nonresuscitative First Aid Training in Laypersons: A Systematic Review. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 54:447-57, 457.e1-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2008] [Revised: 11/12/2008] [Accepted: 11/12/2008] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
32
|
Heselmans A, Donceel P, Aertgeerts B, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D. The attitude of Flemish occupational health physicians toward evidence-based occupational health and clinical practice guidelines. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009; 83:201-8. [PMID: 19626336 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-009-0449-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2009] [Accepted: 07/06/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify the attitude of occupational health physicians toward evidence-based occupational health (EBOH) and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs); to determine their ability to access, retrieve and appraise the health evidence and the barriers to applying evidence to practice. METHODS A cross-sectional survey study was carried out among all Dutch-speaking occupational health physicians in Belgium (584 physicians could be reached). RESULTS A response rate of 25.5% was achieved. The majority of respondents were positive toward EBOH and CPGs. Most respondents were less confident in basic skills of EBM, except for their searching skills. Perceived barriers to applying evidence to practice were mainly time and lack of EBM skills. CONCLUSIONS Belgian occupational health physicians are interested in the implementation of EBOH in their daily occupational practice and have a general knowledge of EBM. However, there are barriers in the legislative framework, the education and the information infrastructure, which first have to be removed. The time has come for the responsible authorities to take educational initiatives and to take a huge leap forward in the integration of EBOH into occupational practice.
Collapse
|
33
|
Simoens S, Guillaume P, Moldenaers I, Depoorter A, De Coster S, Van den Steen D, Van de Sande S, Debruyne H, Ramaekers D, Lona M. International comparison of orthotic brace prices. Eur J Health Econ 2009; 10:149-155. [PMID: 18521637 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-008-0112-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2007] [Accepted: 05/09/2008] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
This study compared market prices (i.e. third-party reimbursement and patient co-payment) of prefabricated neck, wrist and knee braces in Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Ontario (Canada) and the UK. Data were collected through contacts with health authorities, health insurance funds, manufacturers and distributors. Market prices varied substantially between countries, indicating that manufacturers adapt their price setting strategy to the policy environment and the structure of the brace market of a country. Belgian prices tended to exceed prices in other countries for the selected neck, wrist and knee braces. There seems to be scope for reducing Belgian prices of selected braces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Simoens
- Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-Economics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2, Herestraat 49, P.O. Box 521, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Camberlin C, Ramaekers D. Measuring appropriate use of antibiotics in pyelonephritis in Belgian hospitals. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009; 94:143-151. [PMID: 19157631 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2008] [Revised: 11/03/2008] [Accepted: 12/08/2008] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Inappropriate use of antibiotics can induce antibiotic resistance, treatment failure, increased costs and even mortality. We developed a methodology for measuring guideline compliance of hospital antibiotic prescriptions in community-acquired acute pyelonephritis in Belgium. The claims and clinical data of all Belgian hospitalizations for community-acquired acute pyelonephritis were extracted from a nationwide administrative database. In a clinically homogeneous subset of patients, the percentage of patients who received a guideline-compliant prescription was calculated according to prescription guidelines disseminated in Belgium. In the group of non-pregnant adult female patients, 31% of the prescriptions were not in strict compliance with the guideline. Interhospital variability ranged from 0% to 100% compliance. We conclude that administrative databases can be used to analyze antibiotic prescription behavior in hospitals for homogeneous and clinically relevant patient groups. The interhospital variability observed in Belgian hospitals indicate that there is a clear room for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Camberlin
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Centre administratif Botanique, Door Building (10 eme etage), Boulevard du Jardin Botanique 55, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Simoens S, Vanleene V, De Maré L, Moldenaers I, Debruyne H, Van den Steen D, Ramaekers D. Ostomy appliance prices in Europe. J Med Econ 2009; 12:17-24. [PMID: 19450061 DOI: 10.3111/13696990902843338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article aims to compare market prices (i.e., third-party reimbursement and patient co-payment) of one-piece and two-piece colostomy, ileostomy and ureterostomy appliances in Belgium, Denmark, England and the Netherlands in 2005. METHODS Data were collected through contacts with health authorities, health insurance companies, manufacturers, industry associations and distributors. The price difference between Belgium and another country was expressed as a proportion of the Belgian price. RESULTS A total of 64 out of the 72 ostomy appliance products considered were cheaper in Belgium. Prices of one-piece colostomy appliances and two-piece ileostomy appliances were consistently lower in Belgium. The highest prices of ostomy appliances were observed in the Netherlands. Sixteen out of 20 products and 21 out of 25 products were more expensive in Denmark and England, respectively, than in Belgium. Colostomy appliances were more expensive in England than in Belgium. CONCLUSIONS Market prices varied substantially between countries, indicating that manufacturers adapt their pricing strategy to the policy environment existing in the ostomy appliance market of each country. Also, there appears to be scope for reducing prices in some countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Simoens
- Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2, PO Box 521, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Neyt M, De Laet C, Van Brabandt H, Franco O, Ramaekers D. Cost-effectiveness of statins in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and economic analysis for Belgium. Acta Cardiol 2009; 64:1-10. [PMID: 19317290 DOI: 10.2143/ac.64.1.2034354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 8% of total drug spending by the Belgian government goes to statins. The aim of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in middle-aged Belgian populations. METHODS AND RESULTS Economic evaluations were identified in a systematic literature search and were critically appraised. Furthermore, because prices decreased drastically, a previously published model was adapted applying recent cost data from the Belgian national health insurance. Eleven full economic evaluations were identified. Nine studies compared statins with no treatment and presented heterogeneous results. If alternative interventions, such as smoking cessation or low-dose aspirin treatment were included in the analysis, statin therapy became less cost-effective. Prescribing the cheapest statin on the Belgian market (< Euro 90 medication cost per year) resulted in an incremental cost of Euro 29,173 per life-year gained (LYG) in a male high-risk group aged 60 compared to low-dose aspirin. The incremental cost in a male moderate-risk group aged 50 was Euro 87,022/LYG. Low-dose aspirin was more cost-effective ranging from Euro 3,854/LYG to Euro 29,509/LYG compared to smoking cessation therapy. Smoking cessation therapy was the most cost-effective intervention, providing savings compared to no treatment. CONCLUSIONS In Belgium, the cost-effectiveness of statins for the primary prevention of CVD is rather elevated in comparison with low-dose aspirin, even if the cheapest statin is prescribed. From an economic point of view, prevention with low-dose aspirin is more cost-effective and may present a first choice in primary prevention. Smoking cessation, which is a dominant strategy, should be encouraged at all times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Neyt
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Neyt M, Huybrechts M, Hulstaert F, Vrijens F, Ramaekers D. Trastuzumab in early stage breast cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis for Belgium. Health Policy 2008; 87:146-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2007] [Revised: 11/09/2007] [Accepted: 11/09/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
38
|
Simoens S, De Coster S, Moldenaers I, Guillaume P, Depoorter A, Van den Steen D, Van de Sande S, Debruyne H, Ramaekers D, Lona M. Reforming the Belgian market for orthotic braces: What can we learn from the international experience? Health Policy 2008; 86:195-203. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2007] [Revised: 11/24/2007] [Accepted: 11/25/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
39
|
Vanleene V, De Maré L, Moldenaers I, Debruyne H, Simoens S, Van den Steen D, Ramaekers D. Estimation and comparison of ostomy appliance costs with tariffs in Belgium. Eur J Health Econ 2008; 9:17-22. [PMID: 17180385 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0015-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2006] [Accepted: 09/22/2006] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
This study estimated costs of production and distribution of ostomy appliances, and compared cost estimates with tariffs in Belgium. The cost model took into account manufacturing costs, overhead, R&D, warehousing, profits, and distribution margins. Data were derived from manufacturers, a decomposition of finished products, and interviews with stakeholders. The cost model generated estimated retail prices of euro 2.96 for one-piece appliances, euro 1.62 for two-piece pouches, and euro 2.06 for two-piece flanges. Production and distribution costs accounted for 40 and 60% of retail prices, respectively. Estimated retail prices corresponded well with tariffs for one-piece appliances and for two-piece pouches. For two-piece regular flanges, a substantial difference was observed between the calculated price of euro 2.06 and the tariffs of euro 6.05. In the absence of publicly disclosed information on the cost structure of appliances, estimating ostomy appliance costs is valuable to reimbursement agencies when setting tariffs.
Collapse
|
40
|
Simoens S, Debruyne H, Moldenaers I, Guillaume P, De Coster S, Van den Steen D, Van de Sande S, Ramaekers D, Lona M. Do tariffs and prices correspond with costs? A case study of orthotic braces. J Med Econ 2008; 11:245-54. [PMID: 19450083 DOI: 10.3111/13696990802078845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Belgian third-party payer wishes to set reimbursement tariffs at a level that reflects the costs of orthotic braces. This article aims to calculate production and distribution costs of a prefabricated hard neck and knee brace and to explore whether Belgian tariffs and actual retail prices correspond with estimated costs of these two braces. METHODS The cost model considered manufacturing costs, general overheads, research and development costs, warehousing costs, profit and distribution margins. Data were gathered from manufacturers, a production site visit, desk research, a decomposition of finished products and stakeholder interviews. The price year was 2007. RESULTS The cost model estimated a retail price of euro55-euro150 for the neck brace, depending on assumptions. The estimated retail price for the neck brace was lower than the reimbursement tariff of euro194 and the actual retail price of euro241. The estimated retail price of euro331-euro694 for the knee brace was lower than the actual retail price of euro948. CONCLUSIONS Actual retail prices and reimbursement tariffs for a neck brace and a knee brace exceeded prices based on estimated costs. Therefore, there appears to be scope for reducing tariffs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Simoens
- Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Neyt M, Thiry N, Ramaekers D, Van Brabandt H. Cost effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention in a Belgian context. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2008; 6:67-80. [PMID: 18774871 DOI: 10.2165/00148365-200806010-00006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy was traditionally applied in patients who survived a cardiac arrest or who experienced a symptomatic ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Its use in primary prevention (i.e. in patients who have yet to experience a serious arrhythmic event, but who are considered at high risk for sudden cardiac death) has become more common, and policy makers question whether ICD therapy should be reimbursed in these instances. OBJECTIVE To assess the cost effectiveness of primary prevention ICD therapy versus conventional therapy from the perspective of the Belgian health insurance system. METHOD A lifetime 1-month cycle Markov model was constructed and populated with clinical and effectiveness data from the SCD-HeFT study and real-world Belgian cost data expressed in year 2005 values. Probabilistic modelling and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS ICD therapy results in 1.22 life-years gained (LYG) or 1.03 QALYs gained. The lifetime cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios were euro 59,989 (95% CI 35 873, 113 518) per LYG and euro 71 428 (95% CI 40 225, 134 623) per QALY gained, respectively. A cost-effectiveness ratio <euro 50,000 per QALY gained was obtained in 15.5% of 1000 simulations. Increasing the service life of the device from 5 to 7 years would improve the cost effectiveness to euro 57,229 (95% CI 32 568, 106 410) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS ICD therapy may not be judged cost effective for the primary prevention of death in patients with a SCD-HeFT profile in the Belgian context using current technology and patient selection. A combination of price reductions and increased service life of the device may alter this conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Neyt
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Administratief Centrum Kruidtuin, Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND An experimental setting and software were developed to evaluate cardiovascular autonomic function in conscious rats. A restrained approach was used, which, upon proper habituation, induced little or no stress in the rats and limited motion artifacts. METHODS The ECG and arterial blood pressure were recorded. Time- and frequency-domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV) were calculated. The spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (spBRS) was estimated using the method of statistical dependence. RESULTS The power spectra clearly concentrated in a frequency band with center frequency around 0.4 Hz, the low frequency (LF) component, and one at the respiratory frequency at 1.5 Hz, the high frequency (HF) component. In baseline conditions, a direct association existed between mean R-R and especially HRV parameters denoting vagal modulation such as rMSSD, pNN5, and HF power. Beta-adrenergic blockade by propranolol diminished basal heart rate. Vagal indices increased while there was an exclusive decrease in the low frequency band of HRV. Alpha-adrenergic blockade with phentolamine produced a depressor response with tachycardia, and a clear decrease in the LF component of BPV. Both the LF and HF component in the HRV spectrum were virtually absent. Cholinergic blockade with atropine did not significantly alter BP but induced a clear tachycardia with decreased vagal indices. The HF component of HRV was completely abolished and the LF band was reduced. CONCLUSIONS Both alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade left spBRS virtually unaltered, while cholinergic blockade profoundly diminished spBRS. Spectral fluctuations of beta-sympathetic tone were restricted to the LF range of HRV, while the HF respiratory component represented vagal modulation. The alpha-sympathetic system played a dominant role in the LF oscillations of BPV. A role of the vagus in the HF oscillations of BPV in the rat is questioned. The baroreflex depended mainly on changes in vagal activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Ramaekers
- Dept. of Cardiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg O-N, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Cleemput I, Leys M, Ramaekers D, Bonneux L. Balancing evidence and public opinion in health technology assessments: The case of leukoreduction. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006; 22:403-7. [PMID: 16984672 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462306051312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Leukoreduction, filtering white blood cells from transfusion blood, effectively avoids leukocyte-related complications of blood transfusion. The technology has proven its relative cost-effectiveness for specific patient populations. With the advent of variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, a transmittable spongiform encephalopathy caused by mad cow disease (bovine spongiform encephalopathy), the hard hit United Kingdom introduced universal leukoreduction for all patients as a precaution for transmission of prions in 1999. This costly policy was followed by many other countries, in the absence of much evidence of an actual health problem or of a more than presumed effectiveness of leukoreduction in preventing prion transmission. The core problem proved to be legal. The blood banks are legally accountable for blood safety. This accountability is absolute, based on avoidance of all possible risks, regardless of costs. This strategy leads to inefficiencies in health care: (i) blood safety management is guided by available rather than cost-effective technology, and (ii) private insurance premiums for civil liability are sharply increasing, while they are in no way related to the expected returns and the high and increasing blood safety. A rational safety policy is to be optimal, taking into account costs and effects of the safety procedures. This issue will need an open discussion with the general public of the real risks and a clear and unambiguous definition of proportionality in the precautionary principle, based on the European law.
Collapse
|
44
|
Van Brabandt H, Camberlin C, Vrijens F, Parmentier Y, Ramaekers D, Bonneux L. More is not better in the early care of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort analysis on administrative databases. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:2649-54. [PMID: 16891380 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To assess the outcome and costs of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after initial admission to hospitals with or without catheterization facilities in Belgium. METHODS AND RESULTS From a nationwide hospital register, we retrieved the data of 34 961 patients discharged during 1999-2001 with a principal diagnosis of AMI. They were initially admitted to hospitals without catheterization facilities (A), with diagnostic (B1) or interventional catheterization facilities (B2). Mortality has been recorded till the end of 2003 and re-admissions till the end of 2001. The mortality hazard ratio and 95% CI of 5 years mortality of A vs. B2 was 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) and of B1 vs. B2 was 1.03 (0.98, 1.09). Re-admission rates and 95% CI for cardiovascular reason per 100 patient-years were 23.5 (22.7, 24.3) for A, 23.8 (22.5, 25.1) for B1, and 22.0 (21.2, 22.9) for B2. The mean cost in hospital of a patient at low risk with a single stay was in A 4072 euro (median: 3,861; IQR: 4467-3476), in B1 5083 euro (median: 5153; IQR: 5769-4340), and in B2 7741 euro (median: 7553; IQR: 8211-7298). CONCLUSION Services with catheterization facilities compared with services without them showed no better health outcomes, but delivered more expensive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Van Brabandt
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Wetstraat 155, B-1040, Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Simoens S, Van den Steen D, Vanleene V, De Maré L, Moldenaers I, Debruyne H, Ramaekers D. Drawing on international experience to reform the Belgian market for ostomy appliances. Health Policy 2006; 80:273-80. [PMID: 16647155 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2005] [Accepted: 03/31/2006] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This article aims to review the regulatory framework governing the Belgian ostomy appliance market in the light of the experience of Denmark, France, the Netherlands and Ontario (Canada) with regulation of ostomy appliances. Information about the regulatory framework was derived from the international literature, analysis of legal texts and a survey completed by national experts. The comparative analysis revealed that these countries have adopted varying approaches towards regulating their domestic ostomy appliance market. Strategies to keep down prices include public procurement in Denmark, maximum prices in France and exclusion of expensive appliances from reimbursement in the Netherlands. To contain public expenditure on ostomy appliances, consumption patterns are monitored in the Netherlands, the quantity of reimbursed appliances is limited in Belgium and public reimbursement is restricted in Ontario. Ostomy appliances are generally distributed by community pharmacies and medical equipment shops. In countries that emphasise home care delivery such as Denmark, domiciliary distributors dominate the market to the detriment of community pharmacies which do not seem to be able to offer this service at a competitive price. An avenue for reforming the Belgian ostomy appliance market is proposed which valorizes the role of ostomy care nurses in guiding the choice of ostomy appliances. Furthermore, it is recommended that a competitive tendering process determines the price of ostomy appliances, that reimbursement for service provision by distributors is separated from reimbursement of appliances, and that patients receive a fixed grant from the third-party payer to buy ostomy appliances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Simoens
- Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmaco-economics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, K.U. Leuven, Onderwijs en Navorsing 2, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Beckers F, Verheyden B, Ramaekers D, Swynghedauw B, Aubert AE. EFFECTS OF AUTONOMIC BLOCKADE ON NON-LINEAR CARDIOVASCULAR VARIABILITY INDICES IN RATS. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2006; 33:431-9. [PMID: 16700875 DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2006.04384.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
1. The present study assesses the effects of autonomic blockade (alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor and cholinergic) on cardiovascular function studied by heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure variability (BPV) and baroreflex sensitivity in rats using non-linear dynamics. Little is known about the influence of pharmacological autonomic nervous system interventions on non-linear cardiovascular regulatory indices. 2. In 13 conscious rats, heart rate and aortic blood pressure were measured continuously before, during and after autonomic blockade with atropine, phentolamine and propranolol. Non-linear scaling properties were studied using 1/f slope, fractal dimension and long- and short-term correlation. Non-linear complexity was described with correlation dimension, Lyapunov exponent and approximate entropy. Non-linear indices were compared with linear time and frequency domain indices. 3. Beta-adrenoceptor blockade did not alter the non-linear characteristics of HRV and BPV, although low-frequency power of HRV was depressed. Alpha-adrenoceptor blockade decreased the scaling behaviour of HRV, whereas cholinergic blockade decreased the complexity of the non-linear system of HRV. For BPV, the scaling behaviour was increased during alpha-adrenoceptor blockade and the complexity was increased during cholinergic blockade. The linear indices of HRV and BPV were decreased. 4. The present results indicate that the beta-adrenoceptor system has little involvement in the generation of non-linear HRV and BPV in rats. 5. Alpha-adrenoceptor blockade mostly influenced the scaling properties of the time series, whereas cholinergic blockade induced changes in the complexity measures. 6. The absence of the baroreflex mechanism can trigger a compensatory feed-forward system increasing the complexity of BPV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Beckers
- Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, School of Medicine, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hannes K, Van Royen P, Aertgeerts B, Buntinx F, Ramaekers D, Chevalier P. [Systemic validation of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE network]. Rev Med Liege 2005; 60:949-56. [PMID: 16457396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over recent decades, the number of available clinical practice guidelines has enormously grown. Guidelines should meet specific quality criteria to ensure good quality. There is a growing need for the developement of a set of criteria to ensure that potential biases inherent in guideline development have been properly addressed and that the recommendations for practice are valid and reliable. AIM The AGREE-collaboration is an international network that developed an instrument to critically appraise the methodological quality of guidelines. AGREE promotes a clear strategy to produce, disseminate and evaluate guidelines of high quality. METHOD In the first phase of the international project the AGREE-instrument was tested in 11 different countries. Based on this experience the instrument was refined and optimised. In the second phase it was disseminated, promoted and evaluated in 18 participating countries. Belgium was one of them. RESULTS The Belgian partner in the AGREE-project developed 3 workshops and established 13 validation committees to validate guidelines from Belgian developer groups. We collected 33 questionnaires from participants of the workshops and the validation committees, in which we asked for primary experiences and information on the usefulness and applicability of the instrument. We were also interested in the shortcomings of the instrument and potential strategies to bridge them. DISCUSSION More efforts should be made to train methodological experts to gain certain skills for a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines. Promoting the AGREE-instrument will lead to a broader knowledge and use of quality criteria in guideline development and appraisal. CONCLUSION The development and dissemination of an international list of criteria to appraise the quality of guidelines will stimulate the development of methodologically sound guidelines. International comparisons between existing guidelines will lead to a better collaboration between guideline developers throughout the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Hannes
- Centre Belge d'Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBAM).
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bonneux L, Cleemput I, Ramaekers D. Protected carotid artery stenting (PCAS): a short medical technology assessment. Acta Chir Belg 2005; 105:436-41. [PMID: 16315822 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2005.11679755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
After a period of experimenting with angioplasty and stenting, carotid artery stenting under embolic protection (PCAS) is becoming a viable alternative for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). A standard literature review showed that, at January 2005, there was no evidence that PCAS is more effective than CEA. The high costs of stent and protection device makes PCAS then inferior to CEA. PCAS may be the sole possible option in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis unfit for surgery, where the high risk of stroke overrides uncertainty about health effects and overrides cost-effectiveness. These are a few patients per year in Belgium. Several randomised controlled trials comparing PCAS and CEA are now recruiting patients. To have answers on key questions of cost-effectiveness, it is of paramount importance that these trials recruit and publish rapidly. The KCE (Belgian HealthCare Knowledge Center/Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé/Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg) therefore advises cooperation with these trials. Outside these trials and compassionate use in the few symptomatic patients unfit for CEA, the use of PCAS raises serious ethical questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Bonneux
- Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg (KCE), Brussel.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Beckers F, Ramaekers D, Speijer G, Ector H, Vanhaecke J, Verheyden B, Van Cleemput J, Droogné W, Van de Werf F, Aubert AE. Different evolutions in heart rate variability after heart transplantation: 10-year follow-up. Transplantation 2005; 78:1523-31. [PMID: 15599318 DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000141093.04132.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After heart transplantation, the donor heart is extrinsically denervated. No input of sympathetic or vagal nerves can influence the heart rate, resulting in a flat power spectrum of the beat-to-beat variability. The occurrence and the significance of reinnervation remain controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS We monitored the evolution of heart rate variability (HRV) after heart transplantation, starting from a few weeks postoperatively up to 10 years after surgery. Twenty-four-hour Holter recordings of 216 heart-transplant patients were analyzed using time and frequency domain analysis of HRV. Analysis of all data revealed an increase in 24-hour and night-time total power starting from 2 years after transplantation. Low-frequency oscillations calculated over the total 24 hours, day- and nighttime increased significantly starting from year 4 and onward (year 4-8: P < 0.005). No evolution was found in high-frequency power. Subgroup analysis revealed a group with a clear spectral component (n = 16), a group with a small component (n = 124), and a group with a flat spectrum (n = 76). Only the first group revealed an evolution in both high- and low-frequency power. CONCLUSION These results indicate three different types of evolution in HRV, with reinnervating patterns present in only a minority of the patients. The vast majority of the patients show no signs of reinnervation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Beckers
- Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, K.U. Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vlayen J, Aertgeerts B, Hannes K, Sermeus W, Ramaekers D. A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit. Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17:235-42. [PMID: 15743883 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify a critical appraisal tool for clinical practice guidelines that could serve as a basis for the development of an appraisal tool for clinical pathways. DESIGN Systematic review of the literature and personal contacts. Databases searched were: Medline, Embase, and Cinahl. Search terms were: practice guidelines, appraisal, and evaluation. The items of the identified appraisal tools were examined and thematically grouped into 10 guideline dimensions. Content analysis and scoring of these domains by the appraisal tools was evaluated. RESULTS Twenty-four different appraisal tools of practice guidelines were identified. None scored the evidence base of the clinical content of guidelines. Four tools scored all the guideline dimensions. The Cluzeau instrument is the only one of these four that has been validated. Of the three instruments based on the Cluzeau instrument, the AGREE instrument is the only validated instrument that uses a numerical scale. CONCLUSIONS Being a simplified version of the Cluzeau instrument, the AGREE instrument has the most potential to serve as a basis for the development of an appraisal tool for clinical pathways. However, important limitations will have to be dealt with when developing such a tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Vlayen
- Belgian Federal Health Care Knowledge Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|