1
|
Tan ASL, Chen JT, Keen R, Scout N, Gordon B, Applegate J, Machado A, Hanby E, Liu S, Zulkiewicz B, Ramanadhan S, Obedin-Maliver J, Lunn MR, Viswanath K, Potter J. Culturally Tailored Anti-Smoking Messages: A Randomized Trial With U.S. Sexual Minority Young Women. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:840-849. [PMID: 38065403 PMCID: PMC11034759 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study evaluated effects of exposure to culturally tailored anti-smoking ads versus control ads on quitting intentions, cigarette purchase intentions, and tobacco industry perceptions among young adult, cisgender and transgender, sexual minority women (SMW). STUDY DESIGN An online randomized controlled experiment with 1-month longitudinal follow-up was conducted. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS About 2,214 U.S. SMW ages 18-30 were recruited via online survey panels (The PRIDE Study and Prolific), social media ads and posts, and HER dating app ads. Data were collected in 2021-2022. INTERVENTION Participants were randomly assigned to receive up to 20 tailored ads containing LGBTQ+ branding versus 20 control ads without LGBTQ+ branding over 4 weeks. Both conditions used identical anti-smoking statements and photographs (including several photographs of individuals who self-identified as SMW). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES One-month follow-up intention to purchase cigarettes, intention to quit, marketing receptivity, pro-industry attitudes, and pro-industry beliefs were measured. Analyses were conducted in 2022-2023. Linear regression models predicted outcomes at 1-month follow-up with the randomized arm, adjusted for baseline measures of each outcome and stratified by smoking status (those who currently smoked and those who did not smoke). RESULTS Among those who smoked, follow-up intention to quit increased and intention to purchase cigarettes, marketing receptivity, pro-industry attitudes, and pro-industry beliefs decreased versus baseline in both arms. Follow-up pro-industry beliefs were significantly lower (B=-0.331, 95% CI -0.652, -0.010, p=0.043) in the tailored versus control arm, adjusted for baseline beliefs. Among those who did not smoke, marketing receptivity, pro-industry attitudes, and pro-industry beliefs decreased versus baseline in both arms. Follow-up outcomes did not differ significantly between arms. CONCLUSIONS These findings can inform future anti-smoking campaign development to reduce cigarette smoking-related disparities among young adult, cisgender and transgender, sexual minority women and serve as the basis for developing similar ads for other LGBTQ+ audiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04812795).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy S L Tan
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Abramson Cancer Center, Tobacco and Environmental Carcinogenesis Program, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Jarvis T Chen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan Keen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nfn Scout
- National LGBT Cancer Network, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Bob Gordon
- California LGBT Tobacco Education Partnership, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Elaine Hanby
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sixiao Liu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
| | - Brittany Zulkiewicz
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Juno Obedin-Maliver
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; The PRIDE Study/PRIDEnet, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Mitchell R Lunn
- The PRIDE Study/PRIDEnet, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - Jennifer Potter
- The Fenway Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Beth Israel Lahey Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu J, Hanby E, Kingsley M, Winickoff JP, Gundersen DA, Tan ASL. Dual-Vaping of Nicotine and Cannabis among Adults who Currently Use Tobacco Products in Five New England States. Nicotine Tob Res 2024:ntae062. [PMID: 38502116 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current measures of vaping behaviors do not distinguish what substances participants are vaping and to what extent they are dual-vaping nicotine and cannabis. This study describes the use of new survey questions that more specifically ask whether participants who vape are vaping nicotine, cannabis, CBD, or another substance. METHODS Adults, who reported any past-30-day tobacco use, from five New England states participated in an online survey from April 2021 to July 2022. Participants who vaped were asked, "Have you used any of the following vape substances in the past 30 days?" with the possible responses of nicotine, cannabis, CBD, other, and "don't know." Dual-use of both nicotine and cannabis was defined as the vaping of both nicotine and cannabis and/or CBD in the past-30-days, operationalized as a dichotomous outcome. Data were collected in monthly, repeated cross-sectional waves. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine correlates of dual-vaping. RESULTS The analytic sample included 1547 adults who reported past-30-day tobacco use (mean age 42.9 years, 62.8% female, 85.4% White, 48.5% income of less than $50,000). Over one-quarter (26.1%) reported dual-vaping in the past-30-days. Identifying as male (p=0.002) and self-rated anxiety (p=0.043) were associated with a higher odds of dual-vaping. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that a sizable proportion of a sample of New England adults who have used tobacco in the past-30-days are dual-vaping nicotine and cannabis. Adequate survey measures for assessing the vaping of multiple substances can help in better screening and characterization of health behaviors around dual-use. IMPLICATIONS This study addresses a key gap in adequate survey measures for assessing vaping of multiple substances. We found that among adults with past 30-day tobacco use, dual-vaping was prevalent and associated with different correlates, such as self-reported anxiety and education level, compared to sole-vaping of nicotine or cannabis. Our findings may help in characterizing and targeting future population-level surveillance and intervention efforts for multiple substance use behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Liu
- REACH Lab, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Elaine Hanby
- University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Melody Kingsley
- Massachusetts Tobacco Cessation and Prevention Program (MTCP), Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan P Winickoff
- MassGeneral Hospital Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Boston, MA
- MGH Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Boston, MA
- American Academy of Pediatrics Julius B. Richmond Center, Itasca, IL
| | - Daniel A Gundersen
- Rutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, NJ
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Division of General Internal Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Andy S L Tan
- University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, PA
- University of Pennsylvania, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA
- Abramson Cancer Center, Tobacco and Environmental Carcinogenesis Program, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu J, Winickoff JP, Hanby E, Rees V, Emmons KM, Tan AS. Prevalence and correlates of past 30-day dual-vaping of nicotine and cannabis among adolescents in five New England states. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 254:111055. [PMID: 38071894 PMCID: PMC10872281 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE Adolescent vaping behavior includes vaping of multiple substances, including both nicotine and cannabis (dual-vaping). This study describes the prevalence and the sociodemographic correlates of past 30-day dual-vaping. METHODS We recruited adolescents ages 13-17 from five New England states (Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire) through the Prodege online survey panel from April 2021 to August 2022. Dual-vaping was defined as vaping both nicotine and cannabis (THC and/or CBD) in the past 30-days. We analyzed the prevalence of sole-nicotine, sole-cannabis, and dual-vaping of nicotine and cannabis and used multinomial logistic regression to examine associations between sociodemographic factors and sole- and dual-vaping of nicotine and cannabis. RESULTS The analytic sample included 2013 observations from 1858 participants (mean age 15.1 years, 46.2% female, 74.1% White, 82.2% heterosexual). Among these observations, 5.6% reported past 30-day sole-nicotine vaping, 5.5% reported sole-cannabis vaping, and 7.3% had dual-vaped. Correlates for higher odds of past 30-day dual-vaping included total social media sites used and household tobacco use, in contrast with sole-cannabis vaping, which included older age and self-reported depression (all p's <0.05). DISCUSSION Adolescent past 30-day dual-vaping of nicotine and cannabis was more prevalent than past 30-day sole-vaping of either nicotine or cannabis alone. Future studies should continue to collect detailed data on the type of substances, besides nicotine, that adolescents are vaping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Liu
- Harvard University, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Kresge Building, Boston, MA, USA; REACH Lab, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| | - Jonathan P Winickoff
- Massachusetts General for Children, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Boston, MA, USA; MGH Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Boston, MA, USA; American Academy of Pediatrics Julius B. Richmond Center, Itasca, IL, USA
| | - Elaine Hanby
- University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vaughan Rees
- Harvard University, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Kresge Building, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen M Emmons
- Harvard University, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Kresge Building, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andy Sl Tan
- University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Abramson Cancer Center, Tobacco and Environmental Carcinogenesis Program, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu J, Roberts J, Reynolds MJ, Hanby E, Gundersen DA, Winickoff JP, Rees VW, Emmons KM, Tan ASL. Barriers and facilitators to address vaping in Massachusetts schools: a mixed-methods study of school-based stakeholders. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:589-600. [PMID: 37084410 PMCID: PMC10415734 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
We assessed vaping behaviors, environments, COVID-19 influences, and barriers and facilitators of existing approaches that address adolescent vaping in Massachusetts middle and high schools. Findings from this study will provide considerations for individual schools or districts as they advance adolescent vaping prevention and treatment efforts. We analyzed 310 open-ended comments from Massachusetts school administrators who completed a survey between November 2020 and January 2021. Further, we analyzed nine semi-structured interviews with administrators (e.g., principals, vice principals, school nurses) from Massachusetts school systems (n = 6) and school-based anti-tobacco advocates (n = 3); interviews took place between May and December 2021. Informed by Green's PRECEDE model, we conducted a framework analysis using deductive codes based on the model constructs (enabling, reinforcing, and predisposing factors) and inductive codes of key themes emerging from the interviews. Challenges to addressing adolescent vaping included staff capacity, funding, and lack of mental health and counseling supports. The COVID-19 pandemic was a major barrier to conducting usual in-person vaping programs, but also reduced student vaping at school due to new social distancing practices and bathroom use policies. Facilitators of vaping interventions included peer-led initiatives and parental involvement. Participants discussed the importance of educating adolescents on the harms of vaping and the move toward alternatives-to-suspension programs rather than disciplinary action. School-based anti-vaping program implementers-such as school districts, state departments of education, or local health departments-will need to leverage facilitators such as peer-led initiatives, alternatives-to-suspension approaches, and parental involvement, to increase the potential impact of these programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Liu
- Harvard University, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jane Roberts
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Survey and Qualitative Methods Core, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Elaine Hanby
- University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Daniel A Gundersen
- Harvard University, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Survey and Qualitative Methods Core, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan P Winickoff
- MassGeneral Hospital Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Boston, MA, USA
- MGH Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Boston, MA, USA
- American Academy of Pediatrics Julius B. Richmond Center, Itasca, IL, USA
| | - Vaughan W Rees
- Harvard University, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen M Emmons
- Harvard University, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andy S L Tan
- University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ramanadhan S, Salvia M, Hanby E, Revette AC, Rivard MK, Scout NFN, Applegate J, Gordon B, Machado A, Lunn MR, Obedin-Maliver J, Potter J, Chen JT, Tan ASL. "We're always an afterthought"- Designing tobacco control campaigns for dissemination with and to LGBTQ +-serving community organizations: a thematic analysis. Cancer Causes Control 2023:10.1007/s10552-023-01706-x. [PMID: 37160611 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01706-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence-based health communication campaigns can support tobacco control and address tobacco-related inequities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ +) populations. Community organizations focused on LGBTQ + health (e.g., nonprofits, community centers, and community health centers) can be prime channels for delivering evidence-based health communication campaigns. However, it is unclear how to balance the goals of a) designing campaigns to support broad adoption/uptake and b) adaptation addressing the needs of diverse communities and contexts. As part of an effort to support "designing for dissemination," we explored the key challenges and opportunities staff and leaders of LGBTQ + -serving community organizations encounter when adopting or adapting evidence-based health communication campaigns. METHODS A team of researchers and advisory committee members conducted this study, many of whom have lived, research, and/or practice experience with LGBTQ + health. We interviewed 22 staff members and leaders of community organizations serving LGBTQ + populations in the US in early 2021. We used a team-based, reflexive thematic analysis approach. RESULTS The findings highlight the challenges of attempting to use health communication campaigns misaligned with the assets and needs of organizations and community members. The three major themes identified were as follows: (1) available evidence-based health communication campaigns typically do not sufficiently center LGBTQ + communities, (2) negotiation regarding campaign utilization places additional burden on practitioners who have to act as "gatekeepers," and (3) processes of using health communication campaigns often conflict with organizational efforts to engage community members in adoption and adaptation activities. CONCLUSIONS We offer a set of considerations to support collaborative design and dissemination of health communication campaigns to organizations serving LGBTQ + communities: (1) develop campaigns with and for LGBTQ + populations, (2) attend to the broader structural forces impacting campaign recipients, (3) support in-house testing and adaptations, and (4) increase access to granular data for community organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meg Salvia
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elaine Hanby
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Bob Gordon
- California LGBT Tobacco Education Partnership, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Potter
- Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jarvis T Chen
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andy S L Tan
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hanby E, Gazarian PK, Potter J, Jones R, Elhassan N, Tan AS. "I liked just that it was a communal thing": Feasibility and acceptability of engaging with transgender and gender-diverse persons in a digital photovoice research study on commercial cigarette smoking risk and protective factors. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231169819. [PMID: 37065542 PMCID: PMC10102937 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231169819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Commercial cigarette smoking is the leading modifiable risk factor for more than 16 types of cancer. Over one-third (35.5%) of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adults smoke cigarettes compared to 14.9% of cisgender adults. The objective of this paper is to describe the feasibility of enrolling and engaging with TGD persons in a digital photovoice study to examine smoking risk and protective factors through real-world experiences (Project SPRING). Methods The study comprised a purposeful sample of 47 TGD adults aged ≥18 years who currently smoke and live in the United States (March 2019-April 2020). They participated in three weeks of digital photovoice data collection using Facebook and Instagram closed groups. A subsample participated in focus groups to explore smoking risks and protective factors in greater depth. We summarized the enrollment strategies and accrual rates, participant engagement (posts, comments, and reactions) during the photovoice data collection to assess study feasibility, and respondent feedback on acceptability and likability during and after the study. Results Participants were recruited via Facebook/Instagram advertising (n = 33) and via Craigslist/word-of-mouth (n = 14). Costs ranged from $29 via Craigslist/word-of-mouth to $68 per recruited participant via Facebook/Instagram advertising. On average, participants posted 17 pictures of smoking risks/protective factors, commented 15 times on others' posts, and had 30 reactions within their group over 21 days. Participants' rating of the acceptability and likability of the study were positive based on closed- and open-ended feedback. Conclusion The findings of this report will inform future research to engage with TGD community-engaged research to develop culturally tailored interventions to reduce smoking prevalence among TGD individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Hanby
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Priscilla K. Gazarian
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts
Boston, Boston, USA
| | - Jennifer Potter
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Fenway Institute, Boston, MA,
USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Raquel Jones
- Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts
Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Noon Elhassan
- Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts
Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andy S.L. Tan
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tan AS, Gazarian PK, Darwish S, Hanby E, Farnham BC, Koroma-Coker FA, Potter J, Ballout S. Smoking Protective and Risk Factors Among Transgender and Gender-Expansive Individuals (Project SPRING): Qualitative Study Using Digital Photovoice. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021; 7:e27417. [PMID: 34612842 PMCID: PMC8529476 DOI: 10.2196/27417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transgender and gender-expansive (TGE) adults are twice as likely to smoke cigarettes than cisgender individuals. There is a critical gap in research on effective and culturally sensitive approaches to reduce smoking prevalence among TGE adults. OBJECTIVE This study aims to qualitatively examine the risk and protective factors of cigarette smoking among TGE adults through real-world exemplars. METHODS We conducted a digital photovoice study among a purposeful sample of 47 TGE adults aged ≥18 years and currently smoking in the United States (March 2019-April 2020). Participants uploaded photos daily that depicted smoking risk and protective factors they experienced over 21 days on either private Facebook or Instagram groups. Next, we conducted separate focus group discussions to explore the experiences of these factors among a subset of participants from each group. We analyzed participants' photos, captions, and focus group transcripts and generated themes associated with smoking risk and protective factors. RESULTS We identified 6 major themes of risk and protective factors of smoking among TGE individuals: experience of stress, gender affirmation, health consciousness, social influences, routine behaviors, and environmental cues. We describe and illustrate each theme using exemplar photos and quotes. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study will inform future community-engaged research to develop culturally tailored interventions to reduce smoking prevalence among TGE individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Sl Tan
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Priscilla K Gazarian
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sabreen Darwish
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Elaine Hanby
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Bethany C Farnham
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Faith A Koroma-Coker
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jennifer Potter
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,The Fenway Institute, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Suha Ballout
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|