1
|
Tan ASL, Chen JT, Keen R, Scout N, Gordon B, Applegate J, Machado A, Hanby E, Liu S, Zulkiewicz B, Ramanadhan S, Obedin-Maliver J, Lunn MR, Viswanath K, Potter J. Culturally Tailored Anti-Smoking Messages: A Randomized Trial With U.S. Sexual Minority Young Women. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:840-849. [PMID: 38065403 PMCID: PMC11034759 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study evaluated effects of exposure to culturally tailored anti-smoking ads versus control ads on quitting intentions, cigarette purchase intentions, and tobacco industry perceptions among young adult, cisgender and transgender, sexual minority women (SMW). STUDY DESIGN An online randomized controlled experiment with 1-month longitudinal follow-up was conducted. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS About 2,214 U.S. SMW ages 18-30 were recruited via online survey panels (The PRIDE Study and Prolific), social media ads and posts, and HER dating app ads. Data were collected in 2021-2022. INTERVENTION Participants were randomly assigned to receive up to 20 tailored ads containing LGBTQ+ branding versus 20 control ads without LGBTQ+ branding over 4 weeks. Both conditions used identical anti-smoking statements and photographs (including several photographs of individuals who self-identified as SMW). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES One-month follow-up intention to purchase cigarettes, intention to quit, marketing receptivity, pro-industry attitudes, and pro-industry beliefs were measured. Analyses were conducted in 2022-2023. Linear regression models predicted outcomes at 1-month follow-up with the randomized arm, adjusted for baseline measures of each outcome and stratified by smoking status (those who currently smoked and those who did not smoke). RESULTS Among those who smoked, follow-up intention to quit increased and intention to purchase cigarettes, marketing receptivity, pro-industry attitudes, and pro-industry beliefs decreased versus baseline in both arms. Follow-up pro-industry beliefs were significantly lower (B=-0.331, 95% CI -0.652, -0.010, p=0.043) in the tailored versus control arm, adjusted for baseline beliefs. Among those who did not smoke, marketing receptivity, pro-industry attitudes, and pro-industry beliefs decreased versus baseline in both arms. Follow-up outcomes did not differ significantly between arms. CONCLUSIONS These findings can inform future anti-smoking campaign development to reduce cigarette smoking-related disparities among young adult, cisgender and transgender, sexual minority women and serve as the basis for developing similar ads for other LGBTQ+ audiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04812795).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy S L Tan
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Abramson Cancer Center, Tobacco and Environmental Carcinogenesis Program, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Jarvis T Chen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan Keen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nfn Scout
- National LGBT Cancer Network, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Bob Gordon
- California LGBT Tobacco Education Partnership, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Elaine Hanby
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sixiao Liu
- Department of Population Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
| | - Brittany Zulkiewicz
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Juno Obedin-Maliver
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; The PRIDE Study/PRIDEnet, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Mitchell R Lunn
- The PRIDE Study/PRIDEnet, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - Jennifer Potter
- The Fenway Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Beth Israel Lahey Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brandt HM, Footman A, Adsul P, Ramanadhan S, Kepka D. Implementing interventions to start HPV vaccination at age 9: Using the evidence we have. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2180250. [PMID: 36803261 PMCID: PMC10026886 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2180250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is routinely recommended for adolescents aged 11 or 12 years but can begin at age 9. On-time HPV vaccination by the thirteenth birthday has proven to be effective in preventing HPV cancer and pre-cancer. However, HPV coverage rates continue to lag behind other routinely recommended vaccinations for adolescents. A promising approach to improving coverage is to start HPV vaccination at age 9. This approach has been endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Cancer Society. Benefits of this approach include increased time to complete vaccination series by the thirteenth birthday, additional spacing of recommended vaccines, and a more concentrated focus on cancer prevention messaging. While promising, little is known about how and if existing evidence-based interventions and approaches can be used to promote starting HPV vaccination at age 9. Implementation science frameworks offer scientific direction in how to adapt current and develop new interventions to promote starting HPV vaccination at age 9 and accelerate dissemination and prevent HPV cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather M Brandt
- HPV Cancer Prevention Program, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Alison Footman
- HPV Cancer Prevention Program, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Prajakta Adsul
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deanna Kepka
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ramanadhan S, Alemán R, Bradley CD, Cruz JL, Safaeinili N, Simonds V, Aveling EL. Using Participatory Implementation Science to Advance Health Equity. Annu Rev Public Health 2023; 45. [PMID: 38109515 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060722-024251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Participatory approaches to implementation science (IS) offer an inclusive, collaborative, and iterative perspective on implementing and sustaining evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to advance health equity. This review provides guidance on the principles and practice of participatory IS, which enables academic researchers, community members, implementers, and other actors to collaboratively integrate practice-, community-, and research-based evidence into public health and health care services. With a foundational focus on supporting academics in coproducing knowledge and action, participatory IS seeks to improve health, reduce inequity, and create transformational change. The three main sections of this review provide (a) a rationale for participatory approaches to research in implementation science, (b) a framework for integrating participatory approaches in research utilizing IS theory and methods, and (c) critical considerations for optimizing the practice and impact of participatory IS. Ultimately, participatory approaches can move IS activities beyond efforts to make EBIs work within harmful systems toward transformative solutions that reshape these systems to center equity. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health, Volume 45 is April 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Rosa Alemán
- American Civil Liberties Union-Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cory D Bradley
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jennifer L Cruz
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Nadia Safaeinili
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Vanessa Simonds
- College of Education, Health and Human Development, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA
| | - Emma-Louise Aveling
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee RM, Daly JG, Mallick K, Ramanadhan S, Torres CH, Hayes CR, Bertolini A, Nalls R, Emmons KM. Implementation of evidence-based primary cancer prevention interventions in MA community health centers: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:101. [PMID: 37620976 PMCID: PMC10463327 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00483-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than half of cancers could be prevented by employing evidence-based interventions (EBIs), including prevention interventions targeting nutrition, physical activity, and tobacco. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) are the primary source of patient care for over 30 million Americans - making them an optimal setting for ensuring evidence-based prevention that advances health equity. The aims of this study are to (1) determine the degree to which primary cancer prevention EBIs are being implemented within Massachusetts FQHCs and (2) describe how these EBIs are implemented internally and via community partnerships. METHODS We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to assess the implementation of cancer prevention EBIs. First, we collected 34 quantitative surveys from staff at 16 FQHCs across Massachusetts to determine the frequency of EBI implementation. We followed up with 12 qualitative one-on-one interviews among a sample of staff to understand how the EBIs selected on the survey were implemented. Exploration of contextual influences on implementation and use of partnerships was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quantitative data were summarized descriptively, and qualitative analyses used reflexive, thematic approaches, beginning deductively with codes from CFIR, then inductively coding additional categories. RESULTS All FQHCs indicated they offered clinic-based tobacco interventions, such as clinician-delivered screening practices and prescription of tobacco cessation medications. Quitline interventions and some diet/physical activity EBIs were available at all FQHCs, but staff perceptions of penetration were low. Only 38% of FQHCs offered group tobacco cessation counseling and 63% referred patients to mobile phone-based cessation interventions. We found multilevel factors influenced implementation across intervention types - including the complexity of intervention trainings, available time and staffing, motivation of clinicians, funding, and external policies and incentives. While partnerships were described as valuable, only one FQHC reported using clinical-community linkages for primary cancer prevention EBIs. CONCLUSIONS Adoption of primary prevention EBIs in Massachusetts FQHCs is relatively high, but stable staffing and funding are required to successfully reach all eligible patients. FQHC staff are enthusiastic about the potential of community partnerships to foster improved implementation-providing training and support to build these relationships will be key to fulfilling that promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekka M Lee
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - James G Daly
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Kamini Mallick
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | | | - Cassidy R Hayes
- Caring Health Center, 1049 Main Street, Springfield, MA, 01103, USA
| | - Alyssa Bertolini
- Caring Health Center, 1049 Main Street, Springfield, MA, 01103, USA
| | - Ra'Shaun Nalls
- Office of Diversity & Inclusion, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Karen M Emmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ramanadhan S, Cruz JL, Weese M, Naveed N, Kirk S, Rivard MK, Kirk J, Whitaker A, Peterson K, Eisenkraft A. Similar skills, different frames: a thematic analysis exploring conceptualizations held by community-based organization practitioners and academics regarding skills to use evidence-based interventions to address cancer inequities. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:86. [PMID: 37496041 PMCID: PMC10373222 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00472-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community-based organizations (CBOs) are critical partners in delivering evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to address cancer inequities. However, CBO practitioners do not typically have access to opportunities to build the necessary capacity (skills, knowledge, motivation, and resources) for using EBIs. Although capacity-building interventions can offer a solution, inconsistent definitions and measurements of capacity limit the ability to develop and evaluate such efforts. We explored how and why conceptualizations of core skills for EBI use differ between practitioners and academics addressing cancer and other health inequities. We anchored the inquiry with a commonly used set of target skills for EBI capacity-building efforts. METHODS The study was conducted by an interdisciplinary team of academic researchers and CBO practitioners. We gathered data through semi-structured, hour-long interviews with practitioners and academics working to address cancer and other health inequities (n = 19). After hearing a brief vignette about a CBO addressing cervical cancer inequities, participants considered a widely accepted list of skills for EBI use that included assessing needs, engaging stakeholders, and selecting, adapting, implementing, evaluating, and sustaining the EBI. We used a team-based, reflexive thematic analysis approach grounded in critical and constructivist perspectives. RESULTS Overall, the original list resonated with practitioners and academics and they added new skills to the list (cultural humility and systems change). Practitioners' responses described skills from the reference point of addressing broader community needs and context and achieving change over the long term, emphasizing aspects of health promotion in their descriptions. Academics offered a mix of perspectives, with some focused on addressing community needs (and related flexibility regarding EBIs) but more emphasized skills needed to deliver a specific EBI to achieve a focused set of health and equity outcomes. CONCLUSIONS There is a significant opportunity to leverage complementary expertise and perspectives held by practitioners and academics addressing cancer inequities. However, the different frames utilized suggest proactive efforts will be required to find alignment across groups, particularly in valuing diverse contributions and identifying relevant outcomes of interest for each group. Such alignment is critical to designing effective capacity-building interventions and supporting the routine utilization of EBIs to address cancer inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Jennifer L Cruz
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Maggie Weese
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Natasha Naveed
- University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 William T. Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA, 02125, USA
| | - Shinelle Kirk
- Conservation Law Foundation, 62 Summer St, Boston, MA, 02110, USA
| | - Madison K Rivard
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Judi Kirk
- Boys and Girls Club of Worcester, 65 Boys & Girls Club Way, Worcester, MA, 01610, USA
| | - Albert Whitaker
- American Heart Association, 300 5Th Ave, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA
- St. Mark Congregational Church, 200 Townsend St, Boston, MA, 02121, USA
| | - Karen Peterson
- Tufts Medicine, 800 District Avenue, Suite 520, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA
| | - Arthur Eisenkraft
- University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 William T. Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA, 02125, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ramanadhan S, Weese M, Rosas SR, Cruz JL, Chwa C, Rivard MK, Kirk S, Whitaker A, Kirk J, Peterson K, Eisenkraft A. Priority skills for equity-focused, evidence-based cancer control in community-based organizations: A group concept mapping analysis with academics and practitioners. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e164. [PMID: 37588678 PMCID: PMC10425867 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Community-based organizations (CBOs) are important equity-promoting delivery channels for evidence-based interventions (EBIs). However, CBO practitioners often cannot access needed support to build EBI skills. Additionally, the capacity-building literature is hindered by inconsistent definitions, limited use of validated measures, and an emphasis on the perspectives of EBI developers versus implementers. To address these gaps, we explored commonalities and differences between CBO practitioners and academics in conceptualizing and prioritizing core EBI skills. Methods We utilized Group Concept Mapping, a mixed-methods approach connecting qualitative data (e.g., regarding the range of critical EBI skills) and quantitative data (e.g., sorting and ranking data regarding unique skills) to create conceptual maps integrating perspectives from diverse participants. A total of 34 practitioners and 30 academics working with cancer inequities participated in the study. Results Participants nominated 581 core skills for EBI use, and our team (including practitioners and academics) identified 98 unique skills from this list. Participants sorted them into conceptual groups, yielding five clusters: (1) using data and evaluation, (2) selecting and adapting EBIs, (3) connecting with community members, (4) building diverse and equitable partnerships, and (5) managing EBI implementation. The ordering of importance and presence of skill clusters were similar across groups. Overall, importance was rated higher than presence, suggesting capacity gaps. Conclusions There are helpful commonalities between practitioners' and academics' views of core EBI skills in CBOs and apparent capacity gaps. However, underlying patterns suggest that differences between the groups' perceptions warrant further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maggie Weese
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scott R. Rosas
- Concept Systems, Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Cruz
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cindy Chwa
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Madison K. Rivard
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Albert Whitaker
- American Heart Association, Waltham, MA, USA
- St. Mark Congregational Church, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judi Kirk
- Boys and Girls Club of Worcester, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ramanadhan S, Salvia M, Hanby E, Revette AC, Rivard MK, Scout NFN, Applegate J, Gordon B, Machado A, Lunn MR, Obedin-Maliver J, Potter J, Chen JT, Tan ASL. "We're always an afterthought"- Designing tobacco control campaigns for dissemination with and to LGBTQ +-serving community organizations: a thematic analysis. Cancer Causes Control 2023:10.1007/s10552-023-01706-x. [PMID: 37160611 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01706-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evidence-based health communication campaigns can support tobacco control and address tobacco-related inequities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ +) populations. Community organizations focused on LGBTQ + health (e.g., nonprofits, community centers, and community health centers) can be prime channels for delivering evidence-based health communication campaigns. However, it is unclear how to balance the goals of a) designing campaigns to support broad adoption/uptake and b) adaptation addressing the needs of diverse communities and contexts. As part of an effort to support "designing for dissemination," we explored the key challenges and opportunities staff and leaders of LGBTQ + -serving community organizations encounter when adopting or adapting evidence-based health communication campaigns. METHODS A team of researchers and advisory committee members conducted this study, many of whom have lived, research, and/or practice experience with LGBTQ + health. We interviewed 22 staff members and leaders of community organizations serving LGBTQ + populations in the US in early 2021. We used a team-based, reflexive thematic analysis approach. RESULTS The findings highlight the challenges of attempting to use health communication campaigns misaligned with the assets and needs of organizations and community members. The three major themes identified were as follows: (1) available evidence-based health communication campaigns typically do not sufficiently center LGBTQ + communities, (2) negotiation regarding campaign utilization places additional burden on practitioners who have to act as "gatekeepers," and (3) processes of using health communication campaigns often conflict with organizational efforts to engage community members in adoption and adaptation activities. CONCLUSIONS We offer a set of considerations to support collaborative design and dissemination of health communication campaigns to organizations serving LGBTQ + communities: (1) develop campaigns with and for LGBTQ + populations, (2) attend to the broader structural forces impacting campaign recipients, (3) support in-house testing and adaptations, and (4) increase access to granular data for community organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meg Salvia
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elaine Hanby
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Bob Gordon
- California LGBT Tobacco Education Partnership, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Potter
- Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jarvis T Chen
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andy S L Tan
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gupta J, Dalpe J, Kanselaar S, Ramanadhan S, Boa PC, Williams MS, Wachter K. Ea$ing into the USA: study protocol for adapting the Economic and Social Empowerment (EA$E) intervention for US-based, forcibly based populations. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069069. [PMID: 37012007 PMCID: PMC10083755 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immigrant and forcibly displaced women and girls are disproportionately impacted by the harmful health consequences of intimate partner violence (IPV) in the USA. Economic and Social Empowerment (EA$E), a women's protection and empowerment intervention, has shown promising reductions in IPV and gender inequities among forcibly displaced populations (FDPs) in low-income and middle-income countries. However, research on the integration of gender equity interventions into economic empowerment programming for FDPs within the USA is lacking. Additionally, there is growing interest in integrating gender equity programmes among US-based refugee resettlement organisations, including the International Rescue Committee (IRC). We describe our study protocol for examining the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of EA$E for use with US-based FDPs, and recommendations for adaptation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a convergent parallel study to guide the adaptation of EA$E for use with US-based FDPs. Mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) will be used for the adaptation research. Quantitative data will consist of brief surveys, and qualitative data will consist of focus group discussions (FGDs). Our research will be guided by the 'administration' phase of the ADAPT-ITT framework, which entails pretesting the intervention with the new target audience and implementation context to examine acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility to receive feedback to inform modifications of the original intervention. This is done via theatre testing, an innovative approach to pretesting that allows the new target audience to experience the intervention and provide feedback. We will conduct FGDs with IRC staff (n=4, total of 24 participants) and refugee clients (n=8, total of 48 participants, women and men, French and English speaking). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has received approval from the George Mason University Human Subjects Committee (#1686712-7) and IRC (via reliance agreement). Results will be made available to refugee resettlement organisations, policymakers, funders and other researchers. This study has been registered in Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SZDVY).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jhumka Gupta
- College of Public Health, Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - Jessica Dalpe
- International Rescue Committee, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samantha Kanselaar
- College of Public Health, Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Michelle S Williams
- College of Public Health, Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - Karin Wachter
- School of Social Work, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee RM, Daly JG, Mallick K, Ramanadhan S, Torres CH, Hayes CR, Manuel A, Nalls R, Emmons KM. Implementation of evidence-based primary cancer prevention interventions in MA community health centers: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2588180. [PMID: 36865149 PMCID: PMC9980207 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2588180/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Background More than half of cancers could be prevented by employing evidence-based interventions (EBIs), including prevention interventions targeting nutrition, physical activity, and tobacco. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) are the primary source of patient care for over 30 million Americans - making them an optimal setting for ensuring evidence-based prevention that advances health equity. The aims of this study are to: 1) determine the degree to which primary cancer prevention EBIs are being implemented within Massachusetts FQHCs and 2) describe how these EBIs are implemented internally and via community partnerships. Methods We used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to assess the implementation of cancer prevention EBIs. First, we used quantitative surveys of FQHC staff to determine the frequency of EBI implementation. We followed up with qualitative one-on-one interviews among a sample of staff to understand how the EBIs selected on the survey were implemented. Exploration of contextual influences on implementation and use of partnerships was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quantitative data were summarized descriptively, and qualitative analyses used reflexive, thematic approaches, beginning deductively with codes from CFIR, then inductively coding additional categories. Results All FQHCs indicated they offered clinic-based tobacco interventions, such as clinician-delivered screening practices and prescription of tobacco cessation medications. Quitline interventions and some diet/physical activity EBIs were available at all FQHCs, but staff perceptions of penetration were low. Only 38% of FQHCs offered group tobacco cessation counseling and 63% referred patients to mobile phone-based cessation interventions. We found multilevel factors influenced implementation across intervention types - including the complexity of intervention trainings, available time and staffing, motivation of clinicians, funding, and external policies and incentives. While partnerships were described as valuable, only one FQHC reported using clinical-community linkages for primary cancer prevention EBIs. Conclusions Adoption of primary prevention EBIs in Massachusetts FQHCs is relatively high, but stable staffing and funding are required to successfully reach all eligible patients. FQHC staff are enthusiastic about the potential of community partnerships to foster improved implementation - providing training and support to build these relationships will be key to fulfilling that promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James G Daly
- Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ramanadhan S, Xuan Z, Choi J, Mahtani SL, Minsky S, Gupte H, Mandal G, Jagiasi D, Viswanath K. Associations between sociodemographic factors and receiving "ask and advise" services from healthcare providers in India: analysis of the national GATS-2 dataset. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:2115. [PMID: 36401241 PMCID: PMC9673333 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14538-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
India is home to about 12% of the world's tobacco users, with about 1.35 million tobacco-related deaths each year. The morbidity and mortality rates are socially patterned based on gender, rural vs. urban residence, education, and other factors. Following the World Health Organization's guidance, it is critical to offer tobacco users support for cessation as a complement to policy and environmental changes. Such guidance is typically unavailable in low-resource systems, despite the potential for population-level impact. Additionally, service delivery for tobacco control tends to be patterned by sociodemographic factors. To understand current activity in this area, we assessed the percentage of daily tobacco users being asked about tobacco use and advised to quit by a healthcare provider. We also examined social patterning of receipt of services (related to by rural vs. urban residence, age, gender, education, caste, and wealth).
Methods
We analyzed cross-sectional data from India's 2016-2017 Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS-2), a nationally representative survey. Among 74,037 respondents, about 25% were daily users of smoked and/or smokeless tobacco. We examined rates of being asked and advised about tobacco use overall and based on rural vs. urban residence, age, gender, education, caste, and wealth. We also conducted multivariate logistic regression to assess the association of demographic and socioeconomic conditions with participants' receipt of “ask and advise” services.
Results
Nationally, among daily tobacco users, we found low rates of individuals reporting being asked about tobacco use or advised to quit by a healthcare provider (22% and 19%, respectively). Being asked and advised about tobacco use was patterned by age, gender, education, caste, and wealth in our final regression model.
Conclusions
This study offers a helpful starting point in identifying opportunities to address a critical service delivery gap in India. Given the existing burden on the public health and health systems, scale-up will require innovative, resource-appropriate solutions. The findings also point to the need to center equity in the design and scale-up of tobacco cessation supports so that marginalized and underserved groups will have equitable access to these critical services.
Collapse
|
11
|
Adsul P, Chambers D, Brandt HM, Fernandez ME, Ramanadhan S, Torres E, Leeman J, Baquero B, Fleischer L, Escoffery C, Emmons K, Soler M, Oh A, Korn AR, Wheeler S, Shelton RC. Grounding implementation science in health equity for cancer prevention and control. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:56. [PMID: 35659151 PMCID: PMC9164317 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00311-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The past decade of research has seen theoretical and methodological advances in both implementation science and health equity research, opening a window of opportunity for facilitating and accelerating cross-disciplinary exchanges across these fields that have largely operated in siloes. In 2019 and 2020, the National Cancer Institute's Consortium for Cancer Implementation Science convened an action group focused on 'health equity and context' to identify opportunities to advance implementation science. In this paper, we present a narrative review and synthesis of the relevant literature at the intersection of health equity and implementation science, highlight identified opportunities (i.e., public goods) by the action group for advancing implementation science in cancer prevention and control, and integrate the two by providing key recommendations for future directions. DISCUSSION In the review and synthesis of the literature, we highlight recent advances in implementation science, relevant to promoting health equity (e.g., theories/models/frameworks, adaptations, implementation strategies, study designs, implementation determinants, and outcomes). We acknowledge the contributions from the broader field of health equity research and discuss opportunities for integration and synergy with implementation science, which include (1) articulating an explicit focus on health equity for conducting and reviewing implementation science; (2) promoting an explicit focus on health equity in the theories, models, and frameworks guiding implementation science; and (3) identifying methods for understanding and documenting influences on the context of implementation that incorporate a focus on equity. To advance the science of implementation with a focus on health equity, we reflect on the essential groundwork needed to promote bi-directional learning between the fields of implementation science and health equity research and recommend (1) building capacity among researchers and research institutions for health equity-focused and community-engaged implementation science; (2) incorporating health equity considerations across all key implementation focus areas (e.g., adaptations, implementation strategies, study design, determinants, and outcomes); and (3) continuing a focus on transdisciplinary opportunities in health equity research and implementation science. We believe that these recommendations can help advance implementation science by incorporating an explicit focus on health equity in the context of cancer prevention and control and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prajakta Adsul
- Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM USA
| | - David Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD USA
| | - Heather M. Brandt
- HPV Cancer Prevention Program, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Maria E. Fernandez
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | | | - Essie Torres
- East Carolina University, 2309 Carol Belk Bldg, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
| | | | - Barbara Baquero
- University of Washington, 3980 15th Ave. NE, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | | | - Cam Escoffery
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Karen Emmons
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Montserrat Soler
- Ob/Gyn and Women’s Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - April Oh
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Ariella R. Korn
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Implementation Science, Office of the Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - Stephanie Wheeler
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7411, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Rachel C. Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramanadhan S, Donaldson ST, Siqueira CE, Rackard-James C, Miller E, Tappin J, Tracy N, Minsky S, Maldonado-Campos AA, Bruff C, Mahtani S, Teixeira MS, Viswanath V. Connecting Implementation Science, Community-Engaged Research, and Health Promotion to Address Cancer Inequities in Massachusetts: The UMB/DF-HCC U54 Outreach Core. Am J Health Promot 2022; 36:597-601. [PMID: 34939446 PMCID: PMC10580298 DOI: 10.1177/08901171211062800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The Outreach Core of the U54 Partnership between the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center and the University of Massachusetts Boston created a new model for addressing cancer inequities that integrates implementation science, community-engaged research, and health promotion. Key elements of the approach include engaging a Community Advisory Board, supporting students from underrepresented minority backgrounds to conduct health promotion and community-engaged research, increasing the delivery of evidence-based cancer prevention programs to underserved communities (directly and by training local organizations), supporting research-practice partnerships, and disseminating findings. Our model highlights the need for long-term investments to connect underserved communities with evidence-based cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Elecia Miller
- City of Lawrence Mayor’s Health Task Force, Lawrence, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Sara Minsky
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Vish Viswanath
- Harvard TH. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jacob RR, Korn AR, Huang GC, Easterling D, Gundersen DA, Ramanadhan S, Vu T, Angier H, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Oh AY, Schnoll R. Collaboration networks of the implementation science centers for cancer control: a social network analysis. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:41. [PMID: 35418309 PMCID: PMC9009020 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00290-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi-center research initiatives offer opportunities to develop and strengthen connections among researchers. These initiatives often have goals of increased scientific collaboration which can be examined using social network analysis. METHODS The National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded Implementation Science Centers in Cancer Control (ISC3) initiative conducted an online social network survey in its first year of funding (2020) to (1) establish baseline network measures including the extent of cross-center collaboration and (2) assess factors associated with a network member's access to the network such as one's implementation science (IS) expertise. Members of the seven funded centers and NCI program staff identified collaborations in planning/conducting research, capacity building, product development, scientific dissemination, and practice/policy dissemination. RESULTS Of the 192 invitees, 182 network members completed the survey (95%). The most prevalent roles were faculty (60%) and research staff (24%). Almost one-quarter (23%) of members reported advanced expertise in IS, 42% intermediate, and 35% beginner. Most members were female (69%) and white (79%). One-third (33%) of collaboration ties were among members from different centers. Across all collaboration activities, the network had a density of 14%, suggesting moderate cohesion. Degree centralization (0.33) and betweenness centralization (0.07) measures suggest a fairly dispersed network (no single or few central member(s) holding all connections). The most prevalent and densely connected collaboration was in planning/conducting research (1470 ties; 8% density). Practice/policy dissemination had the fewest collaboration, lowest density (284 ties' 3% density), and the largest number of non-connected members (n=43). Access to the ISC3 network varied significantly depending on members' level of IS expertise, role within the network, and racial/ethnic background. Across all collaboration activities, most connected members included those with advanced IS expertise, faculty and NCI staff, and Hispanic or Latino and white members. CONCLUSIONS Results establish a baseline for assessing the growth of cross-center collaborations, highlighting specific areas in need of particular growth in network collaborations such as increasing engagement of racial and ethnic minorities and trainees or those with less expertise in IS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah R Jacob
- Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
| | - Ariella R Korn
- Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Implementation Science, Office of the Director, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Grace C Huang
- Westat, 1600 Research Blvd., Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Douglas Easterling
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Daniel A Gundersen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Population Sciences, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Thuy Vu
- Health Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Heather Angier
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, 63130, USA
| | - Debra Haire-Joshu
- Center for Diabetes Translation Research, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63117, USA
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - April Y Oh
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Implementation Science Team, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Robert Schnoll
- Department of Psychiatry and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Werts S, Aveling EL, Taylor LA, Singer SJ, Geller AC, Ramanadhan S. Overlooked Potential of Business-Inclusive Networks to Amplify Anchoring Activity Impact. Am J Health Promot 2022; 36:920-922. [PMID: 35383468 DOI: 10.1177/08901171221085452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Mobilizing anchor institutions to promote community health and wellbeing is gaining prominence as an approach to systems change. Anchors are often conceptualized as large, locally rooted, nonprofits that leverage their resources for local benefit. However, existing literature underemphasizes 2 opportunities to enhance the systemic impact of anchoring activity: (1) coordinated action by anchoring networks that include diverse, multi-level stakeholders-a hallmark of health promotion and (2) the potential contributions of the business sector to anchoring networks. Our perspective describes the significance of both for amplifying anchoring impact and identifies critical questions for enabling action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Werts
- 1857Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Sara J Singer
- 10624Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Alan C Geller
- 1857Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Public health research that addresses chronic disease has historically underutilized and undervalued qualitative methods. This has limited the field's ability to advance (a) a more in-depth understanding of the factors and processes that shape health behaviors, (b) contextualized explanations of interventions' impacts (e.g., why and how something did or did not work for recipients and systems), and (c) opportunities for building and testing theories. We introduce frameworks and methodological approaches common to qualitative research, discuss how and when to apply them in order to advance health equity, and highlight relevant strengths and challenges. We provide an overview of data collection, sampling, and analysis for qualitative research, and we describe research questions that can be addressed by applying qualitative methods across the continuum of chronic disease research. Finally, we offer recommendations to promote the strategic application of rigorous qualitative methods, with an emphasis on priority areas to enhance health equity across the evidence generation continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; ,
| | - Morgan M Philbin
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; ,
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ramanadhan S, Ganapathy K, Nukala L, Rajagopalan S, Camillus JC. A model for sustainable, partnership-based telehealth services in rural India: An early process evaluation from Tuver village, Gujarat. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0261907. [PMID: 35025902 PMCID: PMC8757919 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Telehealth can improve access to high-quality healthcare for rural populations in India. However, rural communities often have other needs, such as sanitation or employment, to benefit fully from telehealth offerings, highlighting a need for systems-level solutions. A Business of Humanity approach argues that innovative solutions to wicked problems like these require strategic decision-making that attends to a) humaneness, e.g., equity and safety and b) humankind, or the needs and potential of large and growing markets comprised of marginalized and low-income individuals. The approach is expected to improve economic performance and long-term value creation for partners, thus supporting sustainability.
Methods
A demonstration project was conducted in Tuver, a rural and tribal village in Gujarat, India. The project included seven components: a partnership that emphasized power-sharing and complementary contributions; telehealth services; health promotion; digital services; power infrastructure; water and sanitation; and agribusiness. Core partners included the academic partner, local village leadership, a local development foundation, a telehealth provider, and a design-build contractor. This early process evaluation relies on administrative data, field notes, and project documentation and was analyzed using a case study approach.
Results
Findings highlight the importance of taking a systems perspective and engaging inter-sectoral partners through alignment of values and goals. Additionally, the creation of a synergistic, health-promoting ecosystem offers potential to support telehealth services in the long-term. At the same time, engaging rural, tribal communities in the use of technological advances posed a challenge, though local staff and intermediaries were effective in bridging disconnects.
Conclusion
Overall, this early process evaluation highlights the promise and challenges of using a Business of Humanity approach for coordinated, sustainable community-level action to improve the health and well-being of marginalized communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Lovakanth Nukala
- Apollo Telemedicine Networking Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - John C. Camillus
- Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mueller NM, Hsieh A, Ramanadhan S, Lee RM, Emmons KM. The Prevalence of Dissemination and Implementation Research and Training Grants at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022; 6:pkab092. [PMID: 35005429 PMCID: PMC8735751 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dissemination and implementation (D&I) research is a key factor in the uptake and use of evidence-based cancer control interventions. National Cancer Institute (NCI)–designated cancer centers are ideal settings in which to further D&I knowledge. The purpose of this study was to summarize the characteristics of NCI-funded D&I science grants in the nation’s cancer centers to understand the nature, extent, and opportunity for this key type of translational work. Methods We used the National Institutes of Health Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool to identify active NCI-funded grants in D&I science at NCI clinical cancer centers (n = 13) and comprehensive cancer centers (n = 51) as well as their academic affiliates. Active projects were eligible for inclusion if they 1) were awarded directly to an NCI cancer center or an academic or research affiliate, and 2) identified D&I content in the abstract. Portfolio data were collected in February 2021. Results We identified 104 active NCI-funded D&I research or training grants across the 64 cancer centers; 57.8% of cancer centers had at least 1 NCI-funded D&I grant. Most awards (71.1%) were for research grants. Training grants constituted 29.1% of D&I-focused grants. Overall, 50.0% of grants (n = 52) concentrated on specific cancers. Almost two-thirds of grants (n = 68, 65.4%) had a stated health equity focus. Conclusions More than one-half of NCI-designated cancer centers have active funding in D&I science, reflecting a substantial investment by NCI. There remains considerable room for further development, which would further support NCI’s translational mission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora M Mueller
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ada Hsieh
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebekka M Lee
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen M Emmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Leeman J, Rohweder C, Lee M, Brenner A, Dwyer A, Ko LK, O'Leary MC, Ryan G, Vu T, Ramanadhan S. Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:99. [PMID: 34496978 PMCID: PMC8424169 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00201-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In several recent articles, authors have called for aligning the fields of implementation and improvement science. In this paper, we call for implementation science to also align with improvement practice. Multiple implementation scholars have highlighted the importance of designing implementation strategies to fit the existing culture, infrastructure, and practice of a healthcare system. Worldwide, healthcare systems are adopting improvement models as their primary approach to improving healthcare delivery and outcomes. The prevalence of improvement models raises the question of how implementation scientists might best align their efforts with healthcare systems’ existing improvement infrastructure and practice. Main body We describe three challenges and five benefits to aligning implementation science and improvement practice. Challenges include (1) use of different models, terminology, and methods, (2) a focus on generalizable versus local knowledge, and (3) limited evidence in support of the effectiveness of improvement tools and methods. We contend that implementation science needs to move beyond these challenges and work toward greater alignment with improvement practice. Aligning with improvement practice would benefit implementation science by (1) strengthening research/practice partnerships, (2) fostering local ownership of implementation, (3) generating practice-based evidence, (4) developing context-specific implementation strategies, and (5) building practice-level capacity to implement interventions and improve care. Each of these potential benefits is illustrated in a case study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network. Conclusion To effectively integrate evidence-based interventions into routine practice, implementation scientists need to align their efforts with the improvement culture and practice that is driving change within healthcare systems worldwide. This paper provides concrete examples of how researchers have aligned implementation science with improvement practice across five implementation projects. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00201-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7460, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Catherine Rohweder
- Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7424, Carrboro, NC, 27510, USA
| | - Matthew Lee
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Ave, 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Alison Brenner
- Department of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, UNC School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7293, Carrboro, NC, 27510, USA
| | - Andrea Dwyer
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, 13001 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Linda K Ko
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.,Department of Cancer Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Hans Rosling Center for Public Health, 3980 15th Avenue NE, 4th Floor, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Meghan C O'Leary
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7400, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Grace Ryan
- The University of Iowa, 145 N. Riverside Drive, N475 CPHB, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Thuy Vu
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ramanadhan S, Galbraith-Gyan K, Revette A, Foti A, Rackard James C, Martinez-Dominguez V, Miller E, Tappin J, Tracy N, Bruff C, Donaldson ST, Minsky S, Sempasa D, Siqueira C, Viswanath K. Key considerations for designing capacity-building interventions to support evidence-based programming in underserved communities: a qualitative exploration. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:452-461. [PMID: 32515481 PMCID: PMC7963294 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasing the use of evidence-based programs (EBPs) in community settings is critical for improving health and reducing disparities. Community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations (FBOs) have tremendous reach and trust within underserved communities, but their impact is constrained by limited staff capacity to use EBPs. This exploratory study sought to identify design and delivery considerations that could increase the impact of capacity-building interventions for CBOs and FBOs working with underserved communities. Data come from a community-based participatory research project addressing cancer disparities in Black, Latino, and Brazilian communities from Greater Boston and Greater Lawrence, Massachusetts. We conducted four focus group discussions with program coordinators in CBOs and FBOs (n = 27) and key informant interviews with CBO and FBO leaders (n = 15). Three researchers analyzed the data using a multi-stage coding process that included both prefigured and emergent codes. Key design considerations included embedding customized capacity-building interventions into community networks with local experts, supporting ongoing engagement with the intervention via a range of resources and communication channels, and addressing resource constraints. Regarding the contextual factors that should influence capacity-building intervention content, participants highlighted resource constraints, environments in which EBP use is not the norm, and challenges linking available programs with the multi-level barriers to good health faced by community members. Overall, the study highlights the need for integrated, long-term capacity-building efforts developed in partnership with, and ultimately sustained by, local organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Anna Revette
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alisa Foti
- Mt. Sinai Healthcare Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Elecia Miller
- City of Lawrence Mayor's Health Task Force, Lawrence, MA, USA
| | | | - Natalicia Tracy
- Brazilian Worker Center, Boston, MA, USA.,University of Massachusetts - Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carmenza Bruff
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sara Minsky
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Doris Sempasa
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
PurposeThe business environment is increasingly fraught with societal disruptions—caused by factors such as pandemics, climate change and the probability of sentient machines—that are fundamentally different than the industry disruptions that firms have experienced and determined how to overcome. Societal disruptions create chaotic ambiguity and unknowable futures. This paper offers an approach to strategic management in the context of societal disruptions, employing purpose-driven “smart power” to harmonize the organization and the environment and promote both economic and social sustainability.Design/methodology/approachThe paper integrates the construct of smart power that blends hard and soft power, the concepts of purpose and identity that define what is core, aspirational, enduring and distinctive about the organization and the techniques of taming wicked problems in order to design processes and structures that can function in the context of social disruptions.FindingsThe paper offers a strategic management approach that employs purpose-driven smart power to overcome the challenge and thrive in the context of chaotic ambiguity.Practical implicationsThe approach offers practical guidelines for designing processes and structures that can guide strategic decision making in organizations challenged by societal disruptions.Originality/valueThe distinctive and daunting challenge posed by societal disruptions is delineated, and constructs and frameworks from multiple disciplines are uniquely integrated to potentially tame the chaotic ambiguity and unknowable futures created by these disruptions.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ramanadhan S, Revette AC, Lee RM, Aveling EL. Pragmatic approaches to analyzing qualitative data for implementation science: an introduction. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:70. [PMID: 34187595 PMCID: PMC8243847 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00174-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Qualitative methods are critical for implementation science as they generate opportunities to examine complexity and include a diversity of perspectives. However, it can be a challenge to identify the approach that will provide the best fit for achieving a given set of practice-driven research needs. After all, implementation scientists must find a balance between speed and rigor, reliance on existing frameworks and new discoveries, and inclusion of insider and outsider perspectives. This paper offers guidance on taking a pragmatic approach to analysis, which entails strategically combining and borrowing from established qualitative approaches to meet a study's needs, typically with guidance from an existing framework and with explicit research and practice change goals.Section 1 offers a series of practical questions to guide the development of a pragmatic analytic approach. These include examining the balance of inductive and deductive procedures, the extent to which insider or outsider perspectives are privileged, study requirements related to data and products that support scientific advancement and practice change, and strategic resource allocation. This is followed by an introduction to three approaches commonly considered for implementation science projects: grounded theory, framework analysis, and interpretive phenomenological analysis, highlighting core analytic procedures that may be borrowed for a pragmatic approach. Section 2 addresses opportunities to ensure and communicate rigor of pragmatic analytic approaches. Section 3 provides an illustrative example from the team's work, highlighting how a pragmatic analytic approach was designed and executed and the diversity of research and practice products generated.As qualitative inquiry gains prominence in implementation science, it is critical to take advantage of qualitative methods' diversity and flexibility. This paper furthers the conversation regarding how to strategically mix and match components of established qualitative approaches to meet the analytic needs of implementation science projects, thereby supporting high-impact research and improved opportunities to create practice change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Anna C Revette
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Rebekka M Lee
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Emma L Aveling
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Roseen EJ, Purtle J, Zhang W, Miller DW, Schwartz AW, Ramanadhan S, Sherman KJ. The Intersection of Dissemination Research and Acupuncture: Applications for Chronic Low Back Pain. Glob Adv Health Med 2021; 10:2164956120980694. [PMID: 34104573 PMCID: PMC8150432 DOI: 10.1177/2164956120980694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Dissemination research is the study of distributing information and intervention materials to a specific clinical practice or public health audience. Acupuncture, a healthcare practice involving the stimulation of certain body points, often with thin needles, is considered an evidence-based treatment for low back pain (LBP), but is underutilized in the United States. Body: We will use the example of acupuncture for LBP to identify opportunities to leverage dissemination research to increase utilization of acupuncture. Deficits in the awareness or knowledge of acupuncture may limit its adoption by patients and other stakeholders. Thus, we summarize methods to gather data on stakeholder awareness and knowledge of acupuncture for LBP, i.e., audience research. Engaging multiple stakeholder audiences (e.g., health system leaders, primary care providers, patients), is needed to generate knowledge on promising dissemination strategies for each audience. Audience segmentation is important for identifying population subgroups for whom adoption of acupuncture may require a more intensive or tailored dissemination strategy. To illustrate potential audience ‘segments’, our research discussion focused on developing dissemination strategies by age (i.e., older adults – those age 65 years or older, and younger adults – those under age 65 ). This decision was prompted by Medicare’s recent policy covering acupuncture for chronic LBP. We leverage current knowledge of barriers and facilitators of acupuncture use to discuss how further tailoring of dissemination strategies might optimize adoption of acupuncture in both groups of adults. Experimental study designs could then be used to compare the effectiveness of such strategies to increase awareness, knowledge, or adoption of acupuncture. Conclusions: Conducting dissemination research may improve awareness and knowledge of acupuncture, and ultimately the adoption of acupuncture in biomedical settings. We anticipate that the concepts highlighted in this manuscript will also be helpful for those disseminating information about other complementary and integrative health approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Roseen
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Rehabilitation Science, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts.,New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan Purtle
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Weijun Zhang
- Department of Medicine, UCLA Center for East-West Medicine, Los Angeles, California.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Service Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - David W Miller
- Department of Pediatrics, Connor Integrative Health Network, University Hospitals, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Andrea Wershof Schwartz
- New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karen J Sherman
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Galbraith-Gyan KV, Lee SJ, Ramanadhan S, Viswanath K. Disparities in HPV knowledge by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position: Trusted sources for the dissemination of HPV information. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32:923-933. [PMID: 33999315 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01445-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the differences in HPV and HPV vaccine awareness, knowledge, and beliefs by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic position (SEP) among a national sample of non-Hispanic whites (NH-Whites), non-Hispanic Blacks (NH-Blacks), and Hispanics in the United States. We also examine differences in trusted health information sources by race/ethnicity and SEP. METHODS Data were obtained from the Health Information National Trends Survey, Cycle 1, conducted from January to April 2017. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, multivariate logistic regression, and listwise deletion were used to examine HPV and HPV vaccine awareness and knowledge-related items, and trust in health information sources among NH-Whites, NH-Blacks, and Hispanics 18-49 years old. RESULTS HPV vaccine awareness was moderate with no significant differences across racial/ethnic groups. NH-Whites had significantly higher knowledge that HPV causes cervical cancer than NH-Blacks and Hispanics (p < 0.001). High SEP NH-Blacks (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = [0.24-0.73], p = 0.002]) and Hispanics (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.31-0.79, p = 0.003]) had lower odds of knowing HPV causes a sexually transmitted disease than their white counterparts. Low SEP NH-Blacks (OR = 11.03, 95% CI = [3.05-39.86, p < 0.001]) had 11 times the odds of ever hearing about the HPV vaccine than low SEP NH-Whites. NH-Blacks had twice the odds of trusting health information from television (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = [1.52-3.78]. p < 0.001), and almost six times the odds of trusting health information from religious organizations than low SEP NH-Whites (OR = 5.76, 95% CI = [2.02-16.44, p < 0.001]). CONCLUSION Tailored communication strategies may address the low HPV knowledge among NH-Blacks and Hispanics from high and low SEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayoll V Galbraith-Gyan
- School of Nursing, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Stella Juhyun Lee
- Department of Media and Communication, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Check DK, Zullig LL, Davis MM, Davies L, Chambers D, Fleisher L, Kaplan SJ, Proctor E, Ramanadhan S, Schroeck FR, Stover AM, Koczwara B. Improvement Science and Implementation Science in Cancer Care: Identifying Areas of Synergy and Opportunities for Further Integration. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:186-195. [PMID: 32869193 PMCID: PMC7859137 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06138-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Efforts to improve cancer care primarily come from two fields: improvement science and implementation science. The two fields have developed independently, yet they have potential for synergy. Leveraging that synergy to enhance alignment could both reduce duplication and, more importantly, enhance the potential of both fields to improve care. To better understand potential for alignment, we examined 20 highly cited cancer-related improvement science and implementation science studies published in the past 5 years, characterizing and comparing their objectives, methods, and approaches to practice change. We categorized studies as improvement science or implementation science based on authors' descriptions when possible; otherwise, we categorized studies as improvement science if they evaluated efforts to improve the quality, value, or safety of care, or implementation science if they evaluated efforts to promote the implementation of evidence-based interventions into practice. All implementation studies (10/10) and most improvement science studies (6/10) sought to improve uptake of evidence-based interventions. Improvement science and implementation science studies employed similar approaches to change practice. For example, training was employed in 8/10 implementation science studies and 4/10 improvement science studies. However, improvement science and implementation science studies used different terminology to describe similar concepts and emphasized different methodological aspects in reporting. Only 4/20 studies (2 from each category) described using a formal theory or conceptual framework to guide program development. Most studies were multi-site (10/10 implementation science and 6/10 improvement science) and a minority (2 from each category) used a randomized design. Based on our review, cancer-related improvement science and implementation science studies use different terminology and emphasize different methodological aspects in reporting but share similarities in purpose, scope, and methods, and are at similar levels of scientific development. The fields are well-positioned for alignment. We propose that next steps include harmonizing language and cross-fertilizing methods of program development and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon K Check
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network and Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Louise Davies
- The VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, Hartford, VT, USA.,The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.,Department of Surgery - Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - David Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Samantha J Kaplan
- Duke University Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Enola Proctor
- The Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Florian R Schroeck
- The VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction VA Medical Center, Hartford, VT, USA.,The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.,Section of Urology and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, PA, USA
| | - Angela M Stover
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gupte HA, D'Costa M, Ramanadhan S, Viswanath K. Factors Influencing Implementation of a Workplace Tobacco Cessation Intervention in India: A Qualitative Exploration. Workplace Health Saf 2020; 69:56-67. [PMID: 33308086 DOI: 10.1177/2165079920952761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco use is projected to cause more than 8 million deaths annually worldwide by 2030 and is currently linked to 1 million annual deaths in India. Very few workplaces provide tobacco cessation as a part of occupational health in India. In this study, we examined promoters and barriers to implementing an evidence-based tobacco cessation program in a workplace setting in India. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted with all facilitators (two program coordinators and four counselors) of a workplace tobacco cessation intervention covering implementation efforts in five organizations, including three manufacturing units and two corporate settings. FINDINGS The identified promoters for implementation of the program were as follows: (a) workplaces that provided access to many individuals, (b) high prevalence of tobacco use that made the intervention relevant, (c) core components (awareness sessions, face-to-face counseling and 6-months follow-up) that were adaptable, (d) engagement of the management in planning and execution of the intervention, (e) employees' support to each other to quit tobacco, (f) training the medical unit within the workplace to provide limited advice, and (g) efforts to advocate tobacco-free policies within the setting. Barriers centered around (a) lack of ownership from the workplace management, (b) schedules of counselors not matching with employees, (c) nonavailability of employees because of workload, and (d) lack of privacy for counseling. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study provided practical insights into the aspects of planning, engaging, executing and the process of implementation of a tobacco cessation intervention in a workplace setting. It provided guidance for an intervention within occupational health units in similar settings.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ramanadhan S, Fontanet C, Teixeira M, Mahtani S, Katz I. Exploring attitudes of adolescents and caregivers towards community-based delivery of the HPV vaccine: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1531. [PMID: 33036585 PMCID: PMC7547455 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09632-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among adolescents is an important strategy to prevent cervical and other cancers in adulthood. However, uptake remains far below the Healthy People 2020 targets for the US. Given the barriers to population-level vaccination policies and challenges to incorporating additional action items during clinical visits, we sought to explore alternative delivery mechanisms, specifically delivery of the vaccine in community settings. METHODS We conducted six focus groups (three with adolescents aged 11-14 who had not received the HPV vaccine and three with caregivers of adolescents meeting those criteria) from Black, Latino, and Brazilian communities in Massachusetts. We utilized a framework analysis approach that involved a multi-stage coding process employing both prefigured and emergent codes. Initial interpretations were refined through consultation with an advisory board. RESULTS Adolescents and caregivers expressed a range of concerns about the HPV vaccine and also described interest in learning more about the vaccine, emphasizing the importance of a relationship with a trusted provider as a facilitator of vaccine acceptance. Regarding community-based delivery of the vaccine, reactions were mainly negative. However, adolescents and caregivers noted that receiving information in community settings that could seed a conversation with a trusted provider would be welcome. Interestingly, the notion of a trusted provider seemed to extend broadly to practitioners linked to the trusted main provider. CONCLUSIONS The study highlights an opportunity for increasing HPV vaccination among some racial and ethnic minority populations by leveraging trusted community organizations to provide information and seed conversations with a potentially broad group of trusted providers. A task-shifting approach, or reliance on staff with fewer formal credentials, may offer opportunities to support vaccination in resource-constrained settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Longwood Avenue, Kresge 7th floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | | | - Marina Teixeira
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Sitara Mahtani
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Ingrid Katz
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Harvard Global Health Institute, 42 Church St, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Galbraith-Gyan KV, Ramanadhan S, Viswanath K. Community Stakeholders' Perspectives on Introducing Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Biobanking Evidence-Based Programs Within Medically Underserved Communities: A Community-Engaged Approach. Int Q Community Health Educ 2020; 41:315-323. [PMID: 32664800 DOI: 10.1177/0272684x20942071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We explored the perspectives of program coordinators and community leaders from Community-based-organizations (CBOs) and Faith-based-organizations (FBOs) to determine how information on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and biobanking is understood and supported within medically underserved communities, and identified strategies for introducing evidence-based programs (EBP) on HPV vaccination and biobanking within underserved communities. METHODS The EPIS framework guided discussions in four focus groups with program coordinators (n = 27) and one-on-one interviews with community leaders (n = 15) from CBOs and FBOs. RESULTS Participants reported that community members were aware of HPV vaccination but did not know of the link between HPV infection and cancers. Awareness for biobanking was low. HPV vaccination and biobanking were not priority health concerns among community members due to other health issues. However, HPV vaccination and biobanking were considered sensitive health topics. For HPV vaccination, sensitivity was due to concerns that HPV vaccination promoted sex among adolescents, while for biobanking, sensitivity was due to historical abuses of people of color by the medical community. Participants reported that program coordinators' awareness of HPV vaccination and biobanking depended on their organizations' mission. Neither were considered a priority health concern due to lack of funding. Few EBP were available on HPV vaccination and biobanking. Recommendations on culturally-appropriate strategies for engaging community members on HPV vaccination and biobanking EBP are discussed. CONCLUSION Given the promise of HPV vaccination and the Precision Medicine Initiative to reduce cancer disparities, findings elucidate factors to be considered when implementing EBP on HPV vaccination and biobanking into medically underserved communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayoll V Galbraith-Gyan
- School of Nursing, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- Lee Kum Kee Professor of Health Communication, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.,Population Sciences Division, Center for Community Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ramanadhan S, Daly J, Lee RM, Kruse GR, Deutsch C. Network-Based Delivery and Sustainment of Evidence-Based Prevention in Community-Clinical Partnerships Addressing Health Equity: A Qualitative Exploration. Front Public Health 2020; 8:213. [PMID: 32671008 PMCID: PMC7332771 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Increased delivery of evidence-based preventive services can improve population health and increase health equity. Community-clinical partnerships offer particular promise, but delivery and sustainment of preventive services through these systems face several challenges related to service integration and collaboration. We used a social network analysis perspective to explore (a) the range of contributions made by community-clinical partnership network members to support the delivery of evidence-based preventive services and (b) important influences on the ability of these partnerships to sustain service delivery. Methods: Data come from an implementation evaluation of the Prevention and Wellness Trust Fund initiative, which supported nine Massachusetts communities to coordinate delivery of evidence-based prevention and address inequities in hypertension, pediatric asthma, falls among older adults, or tobacco use. In 2016, we conducted semi-structured interviews with (a) leadership teams representing nine community-level partnerships and (b) practitioners from four high-implementation partnerships (n = 23). We managed data using NVivo11 and utilized a framework analysis approach. Results: Key network contributions for delivery of evidence-based preventive services included creating referrals, delivering services, providing links to community members, and administration and leadership. Less emphasized contributions included wraparound services, technical assistance, and venue provision. Implementers from high-implementation partnerships also highlighted contributions such as program adaptation, creating buy-in, and sharing information to improve service delivery. Expected drivers of program sustainability included the ability to develop a business case, ongoing network facilitation, technology support, continued integrated action, and sufficient staffing to maintain programming. Conclusion: The study highlights the need to take a long-term, infrastructure-focused approach when designing community-clinical partnerships. Strategic partnership composition, including identifying sources of necessary network contributions, in conjunction with efforts from the outset to link systems, align effort, and build a long-term funding structure can support the required coordinated action around preventive services needed to improve health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - James Daly
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rebekka M. Lee
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gina R. Kruse
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Charles Deutsch
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ramanadhan S, Aronstein D, Martinez-Dominguez V, Xuan Z, Viswanath K. Designing Capacity-Building Supports to Promote Evidence-Based Programs in Community-Based Organizations Working with Underserved Populations. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2020; 14:149-160. [PMID: 33416638 PMCID: PMC11017196 DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is critical to build capacity to use evidence-based health promotion programs in community-based organizations (CBOs), particularly those working with underserved populations. Packages of ongoing capacity-building supports seem to be critical, but it is not clear how best to design and deploy them. OBJECTIVES PLANET MassCONECT was a participatory research project to increase capacity for the use of evidence-based programs (EBPs) among CBO staff members in three Massachusetts communities experiencing health disparities. We assessed the impact of trainee engagement with capacity-building supports on the use of a systematic approach to program planning. METHODS Trainees were enrolled from 2010 to 2012 and engaged until 2014. The intervention started with a workshop and included ongoing capacity-building supports (a customized web portal and resources, networking events, minigrants, and technical assistance). Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between trainee engagement with capacity-building supports offered after the workshop and key outcomes at year 1. RESULTS Of the capacity-building supports offered after the workshop, the web portal was the most popular. Higher use of systematic program planning approaches in the first year was predicted by web portal use (odds ratio [OR], 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-8.67; p = 0.04), and participation in the minigrant process (OR, 5.40; 95% CI, 1.09-28.69; p = 0.04). Separately, high intention to use systematic approaches for program planning was predicted by web portal use (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.27-9.52; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Ongoing capacity-building supports may promote EBP planning in CBOs, but institutional constraints may limit practitioners' ability to engage with such supports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ziming Xuan
- . Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ramanadhan S, Aronstein D, Martinez-Dominguez V, Xuan Z, Viswanath K. Designing Capacity-Building Supports to Promote Evidence-Based Programs in Community-Based Organizations Working with Underserved Populations. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2020. [DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
31
|
Bekalu MA, Ramanadhan S, Bigman CA, Nagler RH, Viswanath K. Graphic and Arousing? Emotional and Cognitive Reactions to Tobacco Graphic Health Warnings and Associated Quit-Related Outcomes Among Low SEP Population Groups. Health Communication 2019; 34:726-734. [PMID: 29388802 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1434733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Research on graphic health warnings (GHWs) indicates that beyond changing cognitions about the health effects of smoking, GHWs evoke emotional reactions that can influence quit-related outcomes. Emotions can be classified based on valence (positive or negative) and arousal (calm or excited). However, although considerable research has examined the differential effectiveness of positive versus negative GHW-evoked emotions, research investigating the role of arousal activation in quit-related behaviors is scarce. This study examined associations between quit-related outcomes (intention and attempt to quit) and GHWs-evoked negative emotions classified as high and low in arousal activation as well as cognitive reactions among smokers of low socioeconomic position (SEP). It also examined whether perceived health risks of smoking moderate the relationship between emotional and cognitive reactions to GHWs and quit-related outcomes. Data were collected from low SEP smokers in three Massachusetts communities. Participants were screened and randomized to view one of the nine GHWs initially proposed for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and answered pre- and post-exposure questions. Results showed that GHW-evoked negative emotions high in arousal activation and cognitive reactions were both significantly associated with intention to quit during immediate post-test, controlling for age, warning label difference, and prior quit intention. However, these associations did not hold for quit attempts at follow-up. Perceived health risks of smoking moderated the association between cognitive reactions to GHWs and quit attempts at follow-up. The findings suggest that not all negative emotions evoked by GHWs are effective. Negative emotions high in arousal activation may be more effective in influencing quit-related behavioral intentions in low SEP groups. Additionally, unlike emotional reactions, cognitive reactions to GHWs may have effects that last relatively longer, but only among smokers who had low levels of perceived health risks of smoking at baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mesfin Awoke Bekalu
- a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | - Cabral A Bigman
- b Department of Communication , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
| | - Rebekah H Nagler
- c School of Journalism & Mass Communication; School of Public Health , University of Minnesota
| | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ramanadhan S, Nagler RH, Alexander-Molloy JM, Viswanath K. Local Organizations Supporting Implementation of Graphic Health Warnings for Tobacco in Underserved Communities: A Qualitative Inquiry. Front Public Health 2018; 6:322. [PMID: 30483491 PMCID: PMC6243197 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Graphic health warnings (GHWs) on cigarette packages offer the potential to support tobacco cessation and prevention of initiation. Guidance for supporting implementation at the local level is limited, which can lead to missed opportunities to amplify the health impact of GHWs. This study examines the potential for local organizations engaged in tobacco control in underserved communities to support GHW implementation. Materials and Methods: Key informant interviews were conducted with 20 leaders in the three partner communities of Boston, Lawrence, and Worcester, Massachusetts. Data were analyzed using a combination of inductive and deductive methods, grounded in a framework analysis approach. Results: First, participants expected local organizations to play a diverse range of roles to support GHW policy implementation, ranging from convening local actors to offering complementary health education activities. Second, there is a need for external agencies to actively support local organizations during the pre-implementation and implementation phases, e.g., by engaging local organizations and providing resources and technical assistance. Finally, participants noted concerns about potential disconnects between the GHWs and the needs of underserved populations. Discussion: With the necessary supports, local community organizations can be important implementation partners to maximize the impact of GHWs and ensure that benefits accrue to members of underserved communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rebekah H. Nagler
- Hubbard School of Journalism & Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lee RM, Ramanadhan S, Kruse GR, Deutsch C. A Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Partnerships and Implementation of the Massachusetts Prevention and Wellness Trust Fund. Front Public Health 2018; 6:150. [PMID: 29922642 PMCID: PMC5996756 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Strong partnerships are critical to integrate evidence-based prevention interventions within clinical and community-based settings, offering multilevel and sustainable solutions to complex health issues. As part of Massachusetts' 2012 health reform, The Prevention and Wellness Trust Fund (PWTF) funded nine local partnerships throughout the state to address hypertension, pediatric asthma, falls among older adults, and tobacco use. The initiative was designed to improve health outcomes through prevention and disease management strategies and reduce healthcare costs. Purpose: Describe the mixed-methods study design for investigating PWTF implementation. Methods: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided the development of this evaluation. First, the study team conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with leaders from each of nine partnerships to document partnership development and function, intervention adaptation and delivery, and the influence of contextual factors on implementation. The interview findings were used to develop a quantitative survey to assess the implementation experiences of 172 staff from clinical and community-based settings and a social network analysis to assess changes in the relationships among 72 PWTF partner organizations. The quantitative survey data on ratings of perceived implementation success were used to purposively select 24 staff for interviews to explore the most successful experiences of implementing evidence-based interventions for each of the four conditions. Conclusions: This mixed-methods approach for evaluation of implementation of evidence-based prevention interventions by PWTF partnerships can help decision-makers set future priorities for implementing and assessing clinical-community partnerships focused on prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekka M Lee
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Prevention Research Center, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Center for Community-Based Research, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gina R Kruse
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Charles Deutsch
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Koczwara B, Stover AM, Davies L, Davis MM, Fleisher L, Ramanadhan S, Schroeck FR, Zullig LL, Chambers DA, Proctor E. Harnessing the Synergy Between Improvement Science and Implementation Science in Cancer: A Call to Action. J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:335-340. [PMID: 29750579 PMCID: PMC6075851 DOI: 10.1200/jop.17.00083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bogda Koczwara
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Angela M. Stover
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Louise Davies
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Melinda M. Davis
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Linda Fleisher
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Florian R. Schroeck
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Leah L. Zullig
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - David A. Chambers
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Enola Proctor
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill; Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System; Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cheltenham, PA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ramanadhan S, Minsky S, Martinez-Dominguez V, Viswanath K. Building practitioner networks to support dissemination and implementation of evidence-based programs in community settings. Transl Behav Med 2018; 7:532-541. [PMID: 28382582 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-017-0488-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Insufficient capacity to use evidence-based programs (EBPs) limits the impact of community-based organizations (CBOs) to improve population health and address health disparities. PLANET MassCONECT was a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project conducted in three Massachusetts communities. Researchers and practitioners co-created an intervention to build capacity among CBO staff members to systematically find, adapt, and evaluate EBPs. The project supported development of trainee social networks and this cross-sectional study examines the association between network engagement and EBP usage, an important goal of the capacity-building program. Trainee cohorts were enrolled from June 2010 to April 2012 and we collected community-specific network data in late 2013. The relationship of interest was communication among network members regarding the systematic approach to program planning presented in the intervention. For Communities A, B, and C, 39/59, 36/61, and 50/59 trainees responded to our survey, respectively. We conducted the full network analysis in Community C. The average degree, or number of connections with other trainees, is a useful marker of engagement; respondents averaged 6.6 reported connections. Degree was associated with recent use of EBPs, in a linear regression, adjusting for important covariates. The results call for further attention to practitioner networks that support the use of research evidence in community settings. Consideration of key contextual factors, including resource levels, turnover rates, and community complexity will be vital for success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW 601, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Sara Minsky
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW 601, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ramanadhan S, Davis MM, Armstrong R, Baquero B, Ko LK, Leng JC, Salloum RG, Vaughn NA, Brownson RC. Participatory implementation science to increase the impact of evidence-based cancer prevention and control. Cancer Causes Control 2018; 29:363-369. [PMID: 29417296 PMCID: PMC5858707 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-018-1008-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
It is critical to accelerate the integration of evidence-based programs, practices, and strategies for cancer prevention and control into clinical, community, and public health settings. While it is clear that effective translation of existing knowledge into practice can reduce cancer burden, it is less clear how best to achieve this. This gap is addressed by the rapidly growing field of implementation science. Given that context influences and is influenced by implementation efforts, engaging stakeholders in the co-production of knowledge and solutions offers an opportunity to increase the likelihood that implementation efforts are useful, scalable, and sustainable in real-world settings. We argue that a participatory implementation science approach is critical, as it supports iterative, ongoing engagement between stakeholders and researchers to improve the pathway between research and practice, create system change, and address health disparities and health equity. This article highlights the utility of participatory implementation science for cancer prevention and control research and addresses (a) the spectrum of participatory research approaches that may be of use, (b) benefits of participatory implementation science, and
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW 601, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Department of Family Medicine and OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail code L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Rebecca Armstrong
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Barbara Baquero
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa Prevention Research Center, University of Iowa, 145 N. Riverside Drive, CPHB N418, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Linda K Ko
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA
| | - Jennifer C Leng
- Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10017, USA
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ramzi G Salloum
- Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Clinical and Translational Research Building, 2004 Mowry Road, Suite 2243, PO Box 100177, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0177, USA
| | - Nicole A Vaughn
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, School of Health Professions, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, USA
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cooper University Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, Rowan University School of Medicine, Glassboro, NJ, USA
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chambers D, Simpson L, Neta G, Schwarz UVT, Percy-Laurry A, Aarons GA, Neta G, Brownson R, Vogel A, Stirman SW, Sherr K, Sturke R, Norton WE, Varley A, Chambers D, Vinson C, Klesges L, Heurtin-Roberts S, Massoud MR, Kimble L, Beck A, Neely C, Boggs J, Nichols C, Wan W, Staab E, Laiteerapong N, Moise N, Shah R, Essock S, Handley M, Jones A, Carruthers J, Davidson K, Peccoralo L, Sederer L, Molfenter T, Scudder A, Taber-Thomas S, Schaffner K, Herschell A, Woodward E, Pitcock J, Ritchie M, Kirchner J, Moore JE, Khan S, Rashid S, Park J, Courvoisier M, Straus S, Blonigen D, Rodriguez A, Manfredi L, Nevedal A, Rosenthal J, Smelson D, Timko C, Stadnick N, Regan J, Barnett M, Lau A, Brookman-Frazee L, Guerrero E, Fenwick K, Kong Y, Aarons G, Lengnick-Hall R, Fenwick K, Henwood B, Sayer N, Rosen C, Orazem R, Smith B, Rosen C, Zimmerman L, Lounsbury D, Rosen C, Kimerling R, Trafton JA, Lindley S, Bhargava R, Roberts H, Gibson L, Escobar GJ, Liu V, Turk B, Ragins A, Kipnis P, Gruszkowski AK, Kennedy MW, Drobek ER, Turgeman L, Milicevic AS, Hubert TL, Myaskovsky L, Tjader YC, Monte RJ, Sapnas KG, Ramly E, Lauver DR, Bartels CM, Elnahal S, Ippolito A, Peabody H, Clancy C, Cebul R, Love T, Einstadter D, Bolen S, Watts B, Yakovchenko V, Park A, Lukesh W, Miller DR, Thornton D, Drainoni ML, Gifford AL, Smith S, Kyle J, Bauer MS, Eisenberg D, Liebrecht C, Barbaresso M, Kilbourne A, Park E, Perez G, Ostroff J, Greene S, Parchman M, Austin B, Larson E, Ferreri S, Shea C, Smith M, Turner K, Bacci J, Bigham K, Curran G, Ferreri S, Frail C, Hamata C, Jankowski T, Lantaff W, McGivney MS, Snyder M, McCullough M, Gillespie C, Petrakis BA, Jones E, Park A, Lukas CV, Rose A, Shoemaker SJ, Curran G, Thomas J, Teeter B, Swan H, Teeter B, Thomas J, Curran G, Balamurugan A, Lane-Fall M, Beidas R, Di Taranti L, Buddai S, Hernandez ET, Watts J, Fleisher L, Barg F, Miake-Lye I, Olmos T, Chuang E, Rodriguez H, Kominski G, Yano B, Shortell S, Hook M, Fleisher L, Fiks A, Halkyard K, Gruver R, Sykes E, Vesco K, Beadle K, Bulkley J, Stoneburner A, Leo M, Clark A, Smith J, Smyser C, Wolf M, Trivedi S, Hackett B, Rao R, Cole FS, McGonigle R, Donze A, Proctor E, Mathur A, Sherr K, Gakidou E, Gloyd S, Audet C, Salato J, Vermund S, Amico R, Smith S, Nyirandagijimana B, Mukasakindi H, Rusangwa C, Franke M, Raviola G, Cummings M, Goldberg E, Mwaka S, Kabajaasi O, Cattamanchi A, Katamba A, Jacob S, Kenya-Mugisha N, Davis JL, Reed J, Ramaswamy R, Parry G, Sax S, Kaplan H, Huang KY, Cheng S, Yee S, Hoagwood K, McKay M, Shelley D, Ogedegbe G, Brotman LM, Kislov R, Humphreys J, Harvey G, Wilson P, Lieberthal R, Payton C, Sarfaty M, Valko G, Bolton R, Lukas CV, Hartmann C, Mueller N, Holmes SK, Bokhour B, Ono S, Crabtree B, Gordon L, Miller W, Balasubramanian B, Solberg L, Cohen D, McGraw K, Blatt A, Pittman D, McCullough M, Hartmann C, Kales H, Berlowitz D, Hudson T, Gillespie C, Helfrich C, Finley E, Garcia A, Rosen K, Tami C, McGeary D, Pugh MJ, Potter JS, Helfrich C, Stryczek K, Au D, Zeliadt S, Sayre G, Gillespie C, Leeman J, Myers A, Grant J, Wangen M, Queen T, Morshed A, Dodson E, Tabak R, Brownson RC, Sheldrick RC, Mackie T, Hyde J, Leslie L, Yanovitzky I, Weber M, Gesualdo N, Kristensen T, Stanick C, Halko H, Dorsey C, Powell B, Weiner B, Lewis C, Powell B, Weiner B, Stanick C, Halko H, Dorsey C, Lewis C, Weiner B, Dorsey C, Stanick C, Halko H, Powell B, Lewis C, Stirman SW, Carreno P, Mallard K, Masina T, Monson C, Swindle T, Curran G, Patterson Z, Whiteside-Mansell L, Hanson R, Saunders B, Schoenwald S, Moreland A, Birken S, Powell B, Presseau J, Miake-Lye I, Ganz D, Mittman B, Delevan D, Finley E, Hill JN, Locatelli S, Bokhour B, Fix G, Solomon J, Mueller N, Lavela SL, Scott V, Scaccia J, Alia K, Skiles B, Wandersman A, Wilson P, Sales A, Roberts M, Kennedy A, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Sperber N, Orlando L, Carpenter J, Cavallari L, Denny J, Elsey A, Fitzhenry F, Guan Y, Horowitz C, Johnson J, Madden E, Pollin T, Pratt V, Rakhra-Burris T, Rosenman M, Voils C, Weitzel K, Wu R, Damschroder L, Lu C, Ceccarelli R, Mazor KM, Wu A, Rahm AK, Buchanan AH, Schwartz M, McCormick C, Manickam K, Williams MS, Murray MF, Escoffery NC, Lebow-Skelley E, Udelson H, Böing E, Fernandez ME, Wood RJ, Mullen PD, Parekh J, Caldas V, Stuart EA, Howard S, Thomas G, Jennings JM, Torres J, Markham C, Shegog R, Peskin M, Rushing SC, Gaston A, Gorman G, Jessen C, Williamson J, Ward D, Vaughn A, Morris E, Mazzucca S, Burney R, Ramanadhan S, Minsky S, Martinez-Dominguez V, Viswanath K, Barker M, Fahim M, Ebnahmady A, Dragonetti R, Selby P, Farrell M, Tompkins J, Norton W, Rapport K, Hargreaves M, Lee R, Ramanadhan S, Kruse G, Deutsch C, Lanier E, Gray A, Leppin A, Christiansen L, Schaepe K, Egginton J, Branda M, Gaw C, Dick S, Montori V, Shah N, Korn A, Hovmand P, Fullerton K, Zoellner N, Hennessy E, Tovar A, Hammond R, Economos C, Kay C, Gazmararian J, Vall E, Cheung P, Franks P, Barrett-Williams S, Weiss P, Kay C, Gazmararian J, Hamilton E, Cheung P, Kay C, Vall E, Gazmararian J, Marques L, Dixon L, Ahles E, Valentine S, Monson C, Shtasel D, Stirman SW, Parra-Cardona R, Northridge M, Kavathe R, Zanowiak J, Wyatt L, Singh H, Islam N, Monteban M, Freedman D, Bess K, Walsh C, Matlack K, Flocke S, Baily H, Harden S, Ramalingam N, Alia K, Scaccia J, Scott V, Ramaswamy R, Wandersman A, Gold R, Cottrell E, Hollombe C, Dambrun K, Bunce A, Middendorf M, Dearing M, Cowburn S, Mossman N, Melgar G, Hopfer S, Hecht M, Ray A, Miller-Day M, BeLue R, Zimet G, Nelson EL, Kuhlman S, Doolittle G, Krebill H, Spaulding A, Levin T, Sanchez M, Landau M, Escobar P, Minian N, Selby P, Noormohamed A, Zawertailo L, Baliunas D, Giesbrecht N, Le Foll B, Samokhvalov A, Meisel Z, Polsky D, Schackman B, Mitchell J, Sevarino K, Gimbel S, Mwanza M, Nisingizwe MP, Michel C, Hirschhorn L, Lane-Fall M, Beidas R, Di Taranti L, Choudhary M, Thonduparambil D, Fleisher L, Barg F, Meissner P, Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter C, Eldridge S, Grandes-Odriozola G, Griffiths C, Rycroft-Malone J, Murray E, Patel A, Sheikh A, Taylor SJC, Mittman B, Guilliford M, Pearce G, Korngiebel D, West K, Burke W, Hannon P, Harris J, Hammerback K, Kohn M, Chan GKC, Mafune R, Parrish A, Helfrich C, Beresford S, Pike KJ, Shelton R, Jandorf L, Erwin D, Charles TA, Parchman M, Baldwin LM, Ike B, Fickel J, Lind J, Cowper D, Fleming M, Sadler A, Dye M, Katzburg J, Ong M, Tubbesing S, McCullough M, Simmons M, Yakovchenko V, Harnish A, Gabrielian S, McInnes K, Smith J, Smelson D, Ferrand J, Torres E, Green A, Aarons G, Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller LJ, Egleston BL, Domchek SM, Olopade OI, Hall MJ, Daly MB, Fleisher L, Grana G, Ganschow P, Fetzer D, Brandt A, Chambers R, Clark DF, Forman A, Gaber RS, Gulden C, Horte J, Long J, Lucas T, Madaan S, Mattie K, McKenna D, Montgomery S, Nielsen S, Powers J, Rainey K, Rybak C, Seelaus C, Stoll J, Stopfer J, Yao XS, Savage M, Miech E, Damush T, Rattray N, Myers J, Homoya B, Winseck K, Klabunde C, Langer D, Aggarwal A, Neilson E, Gunderson L, Escobar GJ, Gardner M, O’Sulleabhain L, Kroenke C, Liu V, Kipnis P. Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation. Implement Sci 2017. [PMCID: PMC5414666 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0575-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
38
|
Ramanadhan S, Nagler RH, McCloud R, Kohler R, Viswanath K. Graphic health warnings as activators of social networks: A field experiment among individuals of low socioeconomic position. Soc Sci Med 2017; 175:219-227. [PMID: 28108053 PMCID: PMC5320580 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Graphic health warnings (GHWs) on cigarette packages present an important tobacco control opportunity, particularly for vulnerable populations suffering a disproportionate tobacco burden. One mechanism by which GHWs may influence smoking outcomes is by prompting interpersonal discussions within health discussion networks (the set of personal contacts with whom an individual discusses health issues). OBJECTIVE The study examined the association between GHW-prompted conversations within health discussion networks and key tobacco-related outcomes, with attention to valence and content of the discussions. METHOD Between August 2013 and April 2014, we recruited 1200 individuals from three communities in Massachusetts, emphasizing recruitment of individuals of low socioeconomic position (SEP) and members of other selected vulnerable groups. Respondents were exposed to the nine GHWs proposed by the FDA in 2011, asked a series of questions, and assessed at follow-up a few weeks later. RESULTS A total of 806 individuals were included in this analysis. About 51% of respondents reported having a health discussion network, with significantly lower reports among African-Americans and Hispanics compared to Whites. Around 70% of respondents (smokers and nonsmokers) with health discussion networks reported having one or more conversations about the GHWs with network members, the bulk of which were negative and focused on warning others about smoking. For smokers, we found a small but positive association between the percentage of network conversations that were negative and reports of quit attempts. CONCLUSION The results point to a potential mechanism by which GHWs may impact tobacco-related outcomes, prompting further inquiry into the role of health discussion networks (and discussion networks, more broadly) in tobacco control among low SEP individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW601, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| | - Rebekah H Nagler
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, 206 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
| | - Rachel McCloud
- Center for Community-based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW601, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
| | - Racquel Kohler
- Center for Community-based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW601, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- Center for Community-based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW601, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nagler RH, Bigman CA, Ramanadhan S, Ramamurthi D, Viswanath K. Prevalence and Framing of Health Disparities in Local Print News: Implications for Multilevel Interventions to Address Cancer Inequalities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017; 25:603-12. [PMID: 27196094 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-1247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Americans remain under-informed about cancer and other health disparities and the social determinants of health (SDH). The news media may be contributing to this knowledge deficit, whether by discussing these issues narrowly or ignoring them altogether. Because local media are particularly important in influencing public opinion and support for public policies, this study examines the prevalence and framing of disparities/SDH in local mainstream and ethnic print news. METHODS We conducted a multi-method content analysis of local mainstream (English language) and ethnic (Spanish language) print news in two lower income cities in New England with substantial racial/ethnic minority populations. After establishing intercoder reliability (κ = 0.63-0.88), coders reviewed the primary English and Spanish language newspaper in each city, identifying both disparities and non-disparities health stories published between February 2010 and January 2011. RESULTS Local print news coverage of cancer and other health disparities was rare. Of 650 health stories published across four newspapers during the one-year study period, only 21 (3.2%) discussed disparities/SDH. Although some stories identified causes of and solutions for disparities, these were often framed in individual (e.g., poor dietary habits) rather than social contextual terms (e.g., lack of food availability/affordability). Cancer and other health stories routinely missed opportunities to discuss disparities/SDH. CONCLUSION Local mainstream and ethnic media may be ideal targets for multilevel interventions designed to address cancer and other health inequalities. IMPACT By increasing media attention to and framing of health disparities, we may observe important downstream effects on public opinion and support for structural solutions to disparities, particularly at the local level. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(4); 603-12. ©2016 AACR SEE ALL ARTICLES IN THIS CEBP FOCUS SECTION, "MULTILEVEL APPROACHES TO ADDRESSING CANCER HEALTH DISPARITIES".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah H Nagler
- School of Journalism & Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | - Cabral A Bigman
- Department of Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Divya Ramamurthi
- Stanford Research into the Impact of Tobacco Advertising, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - K Viswanath
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Koczwara B, Birken SA, Perry CK, Cragun D, Zullig LL, Ginossar T, Nodora J, Chawla N, Ramanadhan S, Kerner J, Brownson RC. How Context Matters: A Dissemination and Implementation Primer for Global Oncologists. J Glob Oncol 2016; 2:51-55. [PMID: 28717683 PMCID: PMC5495445 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.2015.001438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bogda Koczwara
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Sarah A. Birken
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Cynthia K. Perry
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Deborah Cragun
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Leah L. Zullig
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Tamar Ginossar
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Jesse Nodora
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Neetu Chawla
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Shoba Ramanadhan
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Jon Kerner
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| | - Ross C. Brownson
- Bogda Koczwara, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Sarah A. Birken, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; Cynthia K. Perry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Deborah Cragun, University of South Florida and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Leah L. Zullig, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University, Durham, NC; Tamar Ginossar, Department of Communication and Journalism and University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Jesse Nodora, University of California San Diego, San Diego; Neetu Chawla, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; Shoba Ramanadhan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Jon Kerner, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Ross C. Brownson, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ramanadhan S, Nagler RH, McCauley MP, Lora V, Minsky S, Bruff C, Muneton YF, McCloud RF, Puleo E, Viswanath K. Much Ventured, Much Gained: Community-Engaged Data Collection by Adolescents and Young Adults. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2016; 10:217-24. [PMID: 27346767 PMCID: PMC10959024 DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community-engaged data collection offers an important opportunity to build community capacity to harness the power of data and create social change. OBJECTIVES To share lessons learned from engaging 16 adolescents and young adults from a partner community to collect data for a public opinion survey as part of a broader community-based participatory research (CBPR) project. METHODS We conducted an analysis of archival documents, process data, and an assessment of survey assistants' experiences. LESSONS LEARNED High-quality data were collected from a hard-to-reach population. Survey assistants benefited from exposure to research and gained professional skills. Key challenges included conducting surveys in challenging environments and managing schedule constraints during the school year. The tremendous investment made by project partners was vital for success. CONCLUSIONS Investments required to support engaged data collection were larger than anticipated, as were the rewards, prompting greater attention to the integration of adolescents and young adults in research efforts.
Collapse
|
42
|
McCauley MP, Ramanadhan S, Viswanath K. Assessing opinions in community leadership networks to address health inequalities: a case study from Project IMPACT. Health Educ Res 2015; 30:866-881. [PMID: 26471919 PMCID: PMC4836398 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2014] [Accepted: 09/11/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
This study demonstrates a novel approach that those engaged in promoting social change in health can use to analyze community power, mobilize it and enhance community capacity to reduce health inequalities. We used community reconnaissance methods to select and interview 33 participants from six leadership sectors in 'Milltown', the New England city where the study was conducted. We used UCINET network analysis software to assess the structure of local leadership and NVivo qualitative software to analyze leaders' views on public health and health inequalities. Our main analyses showed that community power is distributed unequally in Milltown, with our network of 33 divided into an older, largely male and more powerful group, and a younger, largely female group with many 'grassroots' sector leaders who focus on reducing health inequalities. Ancillary network analyses showed that grassroots leaders comprise a self-referential cluster that could benefit from greater affiliation with leaders from other sectors and identified leaders who may serve as leverage points in our overall program of public agenda change to address health inequalities. Our innovative approach provides public health practitioners with a method for assessing community leaders' views, understanding subgroup divides and mobilizing leaders who may be helpful in reducing health inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P McCauley
- Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226,
| | - S Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - K Viswanath
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ramanadhan S, Mendez SR, Rao M, Viswanath K. Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: a content analysis. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:1129. [PMID: 24313999 PMCID: PMC3924229 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2013] [Accepted: 11/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Community-based organizations (CBOs) are critical channels for the delivery of health promotion programs. Much of their influence comes from the relationships they have with community members and other key stakeholders and they may be able to harness the power of social media tools to develop and maintain these relationships. There are limited data describing if and how CBOs are using social media. This study assesses the extent to which CBOs engaged in health promotion use popular social media channels, the types of content typically shared, and the extent to which the interactive aspects of social media tools are utilized. Methods We assessed the social media presence and patterns of usage of CBOs engaged in health promotion in Boston, Lawrence, and Worcester, Massachusetts. We coded content on three popular channels: Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. We used content analysis techniques to quantitatively summarize posts, tweets, and videos on these channels, respectively. For each organization, we coded all content put forth by the CBO on the three channels in a 30-day window. Two coders were trained and conducted the coding. Data were collected between November 2011 and January 2012. Results A total of 166 organizations were included in our census. We found that 42% of organizations used at least one of the channels of interest. Across the three channels, organization promotion was the most common theme for content (66% of posts, 63% of tweets, and 93% of videos included this content). Most organizations updated Facebook and Twitter content at rates close to recommended frequencies. We found limited interaction/engagement with audience members. Conclusions Much of the use of social media tools appeared to be uni-directional, a flow of information from the organization to the audience. By better leveraging opportunities for interaction and user engagement, these organizations can reap greater benefits from the non-trivial investment required to use social media well. Future research should assess links between use patterns and organizational characteristics, staff perspectives, and audience engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW 703, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jung M, Ramanadhan S, Viswanath K. Effect of information seeking and avoidance behavior on self-rated health status among cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 92:100-106. [PMID: 23523194 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2012] [Revised: 02/06/2013] [Accepted: 02/16/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Social determinants, such as socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity are linked to striking health disparities across the cancer continuum. One important mechanism linking social determinants and health disparities may be communication inequalities that are caused by differences in accessing, processing and utilizing cancer information. In this context, we examined health information-seeking/avoidance as a potential mediator between social determinants and self-rated health (SRH) status among cancer survivors. METHODS Data came from the 2008 well-informed, thriving and surviving (WITS) study of post-treatment cancer survivors (n=501). We examined the mediating effect of health communication-related behavior between SES and disparities in SRH. RESULTS The likelihood of belonging to the Low SRH group was higher among patients who had avoided health information and whose family members had not sought health information on behalf of the survivor, those in the lowest household income bracket, and those who had high school or less education after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSION Differences in SRH among cancer survivors are associated with SES as well as communication inequalities. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS It is necessary to provide a supportive environment in which health information is made available if disparities in health-related quality of life among cancer survivors are to be reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minsoo Jung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ramanadhan S, Viswanath K. Priority-setting for evidence-based health outreach in community-based organizations: A mixed-methods study in three Massachusetts communities. Transl Behav Med 2013; 3:180-188. [PMID: 23795220 PMCID: PMC3685195 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-012-0191-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Priority setting, or determining how to best allocate limited resources, is an important first step for evidence-based public health approaches in community-based organizations (CBOs), but guidance for such work is limited. This study aims to study drivers of priority setting and the way CBOs use data for this work. Data come from PLANET MassCONECT, a Community-Based Participatory Research project focused on knowledge translation among CBOs targeting the underserved in Boston, Lawrence, and Worcester, MA. We conducted four focus group discussions with CBO staff members (31 participants) in 2008 and a survey of 214 CBO staff members in 2009. Multiple, often competing factors appear to drive priority setting, including data, funding, partnerships, and community preferences. The process may be hindered by challenges related to finding, evaluating, and utilizing data for priority setting. Supporting CBOs in efforts to use data effectively and incorporate context into systematic priority-setting processes is vital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- />Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., LW 703, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- />Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., LW 703, Boston, MA 02215 USA
- />Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nagler RH, Ramanadhan S, Minsky S, Viswanath K. Recruitment and Retention for Community-Based eHealth Interventions with Populations of Low Socioeconomic Position: Strategies and Challenges. J Commun 2013; 63:201-220. [PMID: 23439871 PMCID: PMC3579669 DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Given persistent communication inequalities, it is important to develop interventions to improve Internet and health literacy among underserved populations. These goals drove the Click to Connect (C2C) project, a community-based eHealth intervention that provided novice computer users of low socioeconomic position (SEP) with broadband Internet access, training classes, a Web portal, and technical support. In this paper, we describe the strategies used to recruit and retain this population, the budgetary implications of such strategies, and the challenges and successes we encountered. Results suggest that personal contact between study staff and participants and provision of in-depth technical support were central to successful recruitment and retention. Such investments are essential to realize the promise of eHealth with underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah H Nagler
- Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health and Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Promoting awareness, increasing knowledge, and eliminating stigma is important for stopping the spread of HIV/AIDS. The relation of social determinants and communication inequalities with HIV/AIDS-related cognitive processes has not been studied previously in India. Gender-stratified Poisson regression models of 123,459 women and 73,908 men in the 2005-2006 National Family Health Survey were used to calculate relative risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals for these associations. Results indicated that there are significant inequalities in mass media use among different social classes. Education and wealth are strongly and positively associated with awareness of HIV/AIDS and knowledge about prevention and transmission of AIDS and negatively associated with HIV/AIDS-related stigma. These associations attenuated when use of various mass media types were added to the models with television showing the strongest effect. Mass media may be helpful in reducing social disparities in HIV/AIDS outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland K Ackerson
- Department of Community Health and Sustainability, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 3 Solomont Way, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Viswanath K, Nagler RH, Bigman-Galimore CA, McCauley MP, Jung M, Ramanadhan S. The communications revolution and health inequalities in the 21st century: implications for cancer control. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012; 21:1701-8. [PMID: 23045545 PMCID: PMC3468900 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-0852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The radical and transformative developments in information and communication technologies (ICT) offer unprecedented opportunities to promote cancer control and enhance population and individual health. However, the current context in which these technologies are being deployed--where cancer incidence and mortality and communication are characterized by inequalities among different racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status groups--raises important questions for cancer communication research, policy, and practice. Drawing on illustrative data, this essay characterizes the communications revolution and elucidates its implications for cancer control, with a particular focus on communication inequalities and cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Viswanath
- Harvard School of Public Health, 450 Brookline Ave. LW601, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ramanadhan S, Crisostomo J, Alexander-Molloy J, Gandelman E, Grullon M, Lora V, Reeves C, Savage C, Viswanath K. Perceptions of evidence-based programs among community-based organizations tackling health disparities: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res 2012; 27:717-28. [PMID: 22012968 PMCID: PMC3396880 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyr088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2011] [Accepted: 09/01/2011] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Dissemination of prevention-focused evidence-based programs (EBPs) from research to community settings may improve population health and reduce health disparities, but such flow has been limited. Academic-community partnerships using community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles may support increased dissemination of EBPs to community-based organizations (CBOs). This qualitative study examined the EBP-related perceptions and needs of CBOs targeting underserved populations. As part of PLANET MassCONECT, a CBPR study, we conducted six key informant interviews with community leaders and four focus groups with CBO staff members in Boston, Worcester and Lawrence, Massachusetts, in 2008. Working definitions of EBPs among CBO staff members varied greatly from typical definitions used by researchers or funders. Key barriers to using EBPs included: resource constraints, program adaptation challenges and conflicts with organizational culture. Important facilitators of EBP usage included: program supports for implementation and adaptation, collaborative technical assistance and perceived benefits of using established programs. This exploratory study highlights differences among key stakeholders regarding the role of evidence in program planning and delivery. An updated perspective should better incorporate CBO perspectives on evidence and place greater, and much needed, emphasis on the impact of context for EBP dissemination in community settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ramanadhan S, Salhi C, Achille E, Baril N, D'Entremont K, Grullon M, Judge C, Oppenheimer S, Reeves C, Savage C, Viswanath K. Addressing cancer disparities via community network mobilization and intersectoral partnerships: a social network analysis. PLoS One 2012; 7:e32130. [PMID: 22384156 PMCID: PMC3285642 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2011] [Accepted: 01/24/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Community mobilization and collaboration among diverse partners are vital components of the effort to reduce and eliminate cancer disparities in the United States. We studied the development and impact of intersectoral connections among the members of the Massachusetts Community Network for Cancer Education, Research, and Training (MassCONECT). As one of the Community Network Program sites funded by the National Cancer Institute, this infrastructure-building initiative utilized principles of Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) to unite community coalitions, researchers, policymakers, and other important stakeholders to address cancer disparities in three Massachusetts communities: Boston, Lawrence, and Worcester. We conducted a cross-sectional, sociometric network analysis four years after the network was formed. A total of 38 of 55 members participated in the study (69% response rate). Over four years of collaboration, the number of intersectoral connections reported by members (intersectoral out-degree) increased, as did the extent to which such connections were reported reciprocally (intersectoral reciprocity). We assessed relationships between these markers of intersectoral collaboration and three intermediate outcomes in the effort to reduce and eliminate cancer disparities: delivery of community activities, policy engagement, and grants/publications. We found a positive and statistically significant relationship between intersectoral out-degree and community activities and policy engagement (the relationship was borderline significant for grants/publications). We found a positive and statistically significant relationship between intersectoral reciprocity and community activities and grants/publications (the relationship was borderline significant for policy engagement). The study suggests that intersectoral connections may be important drivers of diverse intermediate outcomes in the effort to reduce and eliminate cancer disparities. The findings support investment in infrastructure-building and intersectoral mobilization in addressing disparities and highlight the benefits of using CBPR approaches for such work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|