Local TV News Coverage of Racial Disparities in COVID-19 During the First Wave of the Pandemic, March-June 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted health and social outcomes for people of color in the United States. This study examined how local TV news stories attributed causes and solutions for COVID-19-related racial health and social disparities, and whether coverage of such disparities changed after George Floyd's murder, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We systematically validated keywords to extract relevant news content and conducted a content analysis of 169 discrete local TV news stories aired between March and June 2020 from 80 broadcast networks within 22 purposefully selected media markets. We found that social determinants of COVID-19 related racial disparities have been part of the discussion in local TV news, but racism as a public health crisis was rarely mentioned. Coverage of racial disparities focused far more attention on physical health outcomes than broader social impacts. Stories cited more structural factors than individual factors, as causes of these disparities. After the murder of George Floyd, stories were more likely to mention Black and Latinx people than other populations impacted by COVID-19. Only 9% of local news stories referenced racism, and stories referenced politicians more frequently than public health experts.

Perceptions of Arguments in Support of Policies to Reduce Sugary Drink Consumption Among Low-Income White, Black and Latinx Parents of Young Children

Purpose:

To test for racial/ethnic differences in perceived argument strength in favor of structural interventions to curb childhood obesity among lower-income parents of young children.

Design:

Cross-sectional, self-report.

Setting:

Online research panel, national sample of 1485 US adults in Fall 2019.

Participants:

Parents of children (age 0-5 years) with an annual income <$40,000, stratified by White, Black and/or Latinx race/ethnicity.

Measures:

SSB consumption, policy support, and strength of arguments in favor of marketing restrictions and a penny-per-ounce tax.

Analysis:

Descriptive statistics, multivariable OLS models.

Results:

Race/ethnicity was not a significant predictor of the perceived strength of a composite of marketing arguments (p_Black = 0.07; p_Latinx = 0.10), however it was a significant predictor of the perceived strength of tax arguments (p_Black = 0.01; p_Latinx = 0.01). Perceptions of strength of 12 of 35 discrete SSB tax arguments differed by race/ethnicity (p < .05). Arguments regarding industry targeting of Black children (marketing: p_Black < .001; p_Latinx = .001; tax: p_Black < .001; p_Latinx = .001), were particularly demonstrative of this difference. In contrast, arguments that these policies would provide support for parents (marketing: p_Black = 0.20; p_Latinx = 0.84) and communities (tax: p_Black = 0.24; p_Latinx = 0.58) were seen as strong arguments across groups.

Conclusions:

Black and Hispanic/Latinx parents may be more prepared to move toward SSB policy support than white parents. Emphasizing community benefits of policy may be effective in moving constituents toward policy support across groups.