Facing Eating Disorder Fears: An Open Trial Adapting Prolonged Exposure to the Treatment of Eating Disorders

Eating disorders (EDs) are maintained by core fears, which lead to avoidance behaviors, such as food avoidance or compensatory behaviors. Previously tested exposure-based treatments for EDs have generally focused on proximal outcomes (e.g., food), rather than addressing core fears (e.g., fear of weight gain and its consequences). The current study tested the feasibility and initial clinical efficacy of 10 sessions of imaginal and in vivo exposure for core ED fears (termed "Facing Eating Disorder Fears"), mainly fear of weight gain and its associated consequences. Participants were 36 adults with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa, or other specified feeding and eating disorders determined by semistructured diagnostic interviews. ED symptoms, fears, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 1-month follow-up. Treatment involved 10 sessions of imaginal and in vivo exposure to ED fears in combination with in vivo exposures to feared and avoided situations as homework. ED symptoms and fears decreased from pre- to posttreatment and at 1-month follow-up. BMI increased significantly from pre- to posttreatment, particularly for those with AN. Effect sizes ranged from small to very large. ED symptoms and fears decreased and BMI increased following exposure. Increases in BMI occurred without any direct intervention on eating, suggesting that weight gain can be achieved without a specific focus on food during ED treatment. Facing Eating Disorder Fears may be a feasible stand-alone intervention for EDs. Future research must test comparative efficacy through randomized controlled trials.

A pilot randomized controlled trial of transdiagnostic network-informed personalized treatment for eating disorders versus enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy

OBJECTIVE

Eating disorders (EDs) are serious mental illnesses with high mortality and relapse rates and carry significant societal and personal costs. Nevertheless, there are few evidence-based treatments available. One aspect that makes treatment difficult is the high heterogeneity in symptom presentation. This heterogeneity makes it challenging for clinicians to identify pertinent treatment targets. Personalized treatment based on idiographic models may be well-suited to address this heterogeneity, and, in turn, presumably improve treatment outcomes.

METHODS

In the current randomized controlled trial, participants will be randomly assigned to either 20 sessions of enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-E) or transdiagnostic network-informed personalized treatment for EDs (T-NIPT-ED). Assessment of ED symptoms, clinical impairment, and quality of life will occur at pre-, mid-, posttreatment, and 1-month follow-up.

RESULTS

We will examine the acceptability and feasibility of T-NIPT-ED compared to CBT-E. We also will test the initial clinical efficacy of T-NIPT-ED versus CBT-E on clinical outcomes (i.e., ED symptoms and quality of life). Finally, we will test if the network-identified precision targets are the mechanisms of change.

DISCUSSION

Ultimately, this research may inform the development and dissemination of evidence-based personalized treatments for EDs and serve as an exemplar for personalized treatment development across the broader field of psychiatry.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

Current evidence-based treatments for eating disorders result in low rates of recovery, especially for adults with AN. Our study aims to test the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical efficacy of a data-driven, individualized approach to ED treatment, network-informed personalized treatment, compared to the current evidence-based treatment for EDs, Enhanced CBT. Findings have the potential to improve treatment outcomes for EDs by identifying and targeting core symptoms maintaining EDs.