1
|
Sydes MR, Murray ML, Ahmed S, Apostolidou S, Bliss JM, Bloomfield C, Cannings-John R, Carpenter J, Clayton T, Clout M, Cosgriff R, Farrin AJ, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gilbert DC, Harper C, James ND, Langley RE, Lessels S, Lugg-Widger F, Mackenzie IS, Mafham M, Menon U, Mintz H, Pinches H, Robling M, Wright-Hughes A, Yorke-Edwards V, Love SB. Getting our ducks in a row: The need for data utility comparisons of healthcare systems data for clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 141:107514. [PMID: 38537901 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Better use of healthcare systems data, collected as part of interactions between patients and the healthcare system, could transform planning and conduct of randomised controlled trials. Multiple challenges to widespread use include whether healthcare systems data captures sufficiently well the data traditionally captured on case report forms. "Data Utility Comparison Studies" (DUCkS) assess the utility of healthcare systems data for RCTs by comparison to data collected by the trial. Despite their importance, there are few published UK examples of DUCkS. METHODS-AND-RESULTS Building from ongoing and selected recent examples of UK-led DUCkS in the literature, we set out experience-based considerations for the conduct of future DUCkS. Developed through informal iterative discussions in many forums, considerations are offered for planning, protocol development, data, analysis and reporting, with comparisons at "patient-level" or "trial-level", depending on the item of interest and trial status. DISCUSSION DUCkS could be a valuable tool in assessing where healthcare systems data can be used for trials and in which trial teams can play a leading role. There is a pressing need for trials to be more efficient in their delivery and research waste must be reduced. Trials have been making inconsistent use of healthcare systems data, not least because of an absence of evidence of utility. DUCkS can also help to identify challenges in using healthcare systems data, such as linkage (access and timing) and data quality. We encourage trial teams to incorporate and report DUCkS in trials and funders and data providers to support them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; Health Data Research UK (HDR UK), London, UK; BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK (HDR UK), London, UK.
| | - Macey L Murray
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; Health Data Research UK (HDR UK), London, UK.
| | - Saiam Ahmed
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; UCL Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Sophia Apostolidou
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Judith M Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - Claire Bloomfield
- Insitro Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA; NHS Transformation Directorate, NHS England & NHS Improvement, London, UK.
| | | | - James Carpenter
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Tim Clayton
- Department of Medical Statistics and Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, UK.
| | | | - Rebecca Cosgriff
- NHS Transformation Directorate, NHS England & NHS Improvement, London, UK.
| | - Amanda J Farrin
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Women's Cancer, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Duncan C Gilbert
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Charlie Harper
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | | - Ruth E Langley
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Sarah Lessels
- BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK (HDR UK), London, UK.
| | | | - Isla S Mackenzie
- MEMO Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
| | - Marion Mafham
- Health Data Research UK (HDR UK), London, UK; Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), NDPH, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Harriet Mintz
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Michael Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
| | - Alexandra Wright-Hughes
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Victoria Yorke-Edwards
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Advanced Research Computing, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Sharon B Love
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moody G, Coulman E, Crocker-White E, Gray K, Hastings RP, Longman A, Lugg-Widger F, Playle R, Segrott J, Thompson P, Badger J, Langdon PE, Flynn S. Solutions Trial: Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) in 10-17-year-olds presenting at police custody: a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2024; 25:159. [PMID: 38431608 PMCID: PMC10908054 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07904-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Within England, children and young people (CYP) who come into police custody are referred to Liaison and Diversion (L&D) teams. L&D teams have responsibility for liaising with healthcare and other support services while working to divert CYP away from the criminal justice system but have traditionally not provided targeted psychological interventions to CYP. Considering evidence that Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) leads to a reduction in internalising and externalising behaviour problems in CYP, the aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) was to determine whether there is a difference between services as usual (SAU) plus SFBT offered by trained therapists working within a L&D team, and SAU alone, in reducing offending behaviours in 10-17-year-olds presenting at police custody. METHODS Design: two-arm individually RCT with internal pilot and process evaluation. PARTICIPANTS N = approximately 448 CYP aged 10-17 years presenting at one of three police custody suites in the area served by Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust (LSCFT) who are referred to the L&D team. Participants will be recruited and allocated to intervention:control on a 1:1 basis. Interviews will be performed with 30-40 CYP in the intervention arm, 15 CYP in the control arm, up to 20 parents/guardians across both arms, up to 15 practitioners, and up to 10 site staff responsible for screening CYP for the trial. Intervention and control: Those allocated to the intervention will be offered SAU plus SFBT, and control participants will receive SAU only. PRIMARY OUTCOME CYP frequency of offending behaviours assessed through the Self-Report Delinquency Measure (SRDM) at 12 months post-randomisation. SECONDARY OUTCOMES criminal offence data (national police database); emotional and behavioural difficulties (self-report and parent/guardian reported); gang affiliation (self-report). Process evaluation: evaluation of acceptability and experiences of the CYP, parents/guardians, site staff and practitioners; fidelity of SFBT delivery. DISCUSSION This two-arm individually RCT will evaluate the effectiveness of SFBT in reducing offending behaviours in CYP presenting at police custody suites within the area served by LSCFT. Our process evaluation will assess the fidelity of delivery of SFBT, the factors affecting implementation, the acceptability of SFBT in CYP aged 10-17 years and recruitment and reach. We will also examine systems and structures for future delivery, therefore assessing overall scalability. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN14195235 . Registered on June 16, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwenllian Moody
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
| | - Elinor Coulman
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
- DECIPHer Centre, Cardiff University, Sparc Building, Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK
| | - Emma Crocker-White
- Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Kylie Gray
- Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Richard P Hastings
- Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Andrea Longman
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Rebecca Playle
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Jeremy Segrott
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
- DECIPHer Centre, Cardiff University, Sparc Building, Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK
| | - Paul Thompson
- Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Julia Badger
- Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Peter E Langdon
- Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK
- Brooklands Hospital, Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Birmingham, B37 5RY, UK
| | - Samantha Flynn
- Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lugg-Widger F, Barlow C, Cannings-John R, Gale C, Houlding N, Milton R, Plachcinski R, Robling M, Sanders J. The practicalities of adapting UK maternity clinical information systems for observational research: Experiences of the POOL study. Int J Popul Data Sci 2023; 8:2072. [PMID: 38414546 PMCID: PMC10897763 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Using routinely collected clinical data for observational research is an increasingly important method for data collection, especially when rare outcomes are being explored. The POOL study was commissioned to evaluate the safety of waterbirth in the UK using routine maternity and neonatal clinical data. This paper describes the design, rationale, set-up and pilot for this data linkage study using bespoke methods. Methods Clinical maternity information systems hold many data items of value for research purposes, but often lack specific data items required for individual studies. This study used the novel method of amending an existing clinical maternity database for the purpose of collecting additional research data fields. In combination with the extraction of existing data fields, this maximised the potential use of existing routinely collected clinical data for research purposes, whilst reducing NHS staff data collection burden.Wellbeing Software®, provider of the Euroking® Maternity Information System, added new study specific data fields to their information system, extracted data from participating NHS sites and transferred data for matching with the National Neonatal Research Database to ascertain outcomes for babies admitted to neonatal units. Study set-up processes were put in place for all sites. The data extraction, linkage and cleaning processes were piloted with one pre-selected NHS site. Results Twenty-six NHS sites were set-up over 27 months (January 2019 - April 2021). Twenty-four thousand maternity records were extracted from the one NHS site, pertaining to the period January 2015 to March 2019. Data field completeness for maternal and neonatal primary outcomes were mostly acceptable. Neonatal identifiers flowed to the National Neonatal Research Database for successful matching and linkage between maternity and neonatal unit records. Discussion Piloting the data extraction and linkage highlighted the need for additional governance arrangements, training at NHS sites and new processes for the study team to ensure data quality and confidentiality are upheld during the study. Amending existing NHS electronic information systems and accessing clinical data at scale, is possible, but continues to be a time consuming and a technically challenging exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Christian Barlow
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Rebecca Cannings-John
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Chris Gale
- Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital campus, London, SW10 9NH, UK
| | - Nicola Houlding
- Wellbeing Software Group, i2 Mansfield, Hamilton Court, Oakham Business Park, Mansfield, NG18 5FB
| | - Rebecca Milton
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Rachel Plachcinski
- Parent, patient and public representative, National Childbirth Trust [NCT], Brunel House, Clifton, Bristol BS8 3NG
| | - Michael Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
- DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3WT, UK
| | - Julia Sanders
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Ty Dewi Sant, Heath Park, Cardiff. CF14 4YS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cavallaro FL, Cannings-John R, Lugg-Widger F, Gilbert R, Kennedy E, Kendall S, Robling M, Harron KL. Lessons learned from using linked administrative data to evaluate the Family Nurse Partnership in England and Scotland. Int J Popul Data Sci 2023; 8:2113. [PMID: 37670953 PMCID: PMC10476150 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction "Big data" - including linked administrative data - can be exploited to evaluate interventions for maternal and child health, providing time- and cost-effective alternatives to randomised controlled trials. However, using these data to evaluate population-level interventions can be challenging. Objectives We aimed to inform future evaluations of complex interventions by describing sources of bias, lessons learned, and suggestions for improvements, based on two observational studies using linked administrative data from health, education and social care sectors to evaluate the Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) in England and Scotland. Methods We first considered how different sources of potential bias within the administrative data could affect results of the evaluations. We explored how each study design addressed these sources of bias using maternal confounders captured in the data. We then determined what additional information could be captured at each step of the complex intervention to enable analysts to minimise bias and maximise comparability between intervention and usual care groups, so that any observed differences can be attributed to the intervention. Results Lessons learned include the need for i) detailed data on intervention activity (dates/geography) and usual care; ii) improved information on data linkage quality to accurately characterise control groups; iii) more efficient provision of linked data to ensure timeliness of results; iv) better measurement of confounding characteristics affecting who is eligible, approached and enrolled. Conclusions Linked administrative data are a valuable resource for evaluations of the FNP national programme and other complex population-level interventions. However, information on local programme delivery and usual care are required to account for biases that characterise those who receive the intervention, and to inform understanding of mechanisms of effect. National, ongoing, robust evaluations of complex public health evaluations would be more achievable if programme implementation was integrated with improved national and local data collection, and robust quasi-experimental designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca L. Cavallaro
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- The Health Foundation, 8 Salisbury Square, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Cannings-John
- Centre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Gilbert
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Eilis Kennedy
- Children, Young Adults and Families Directorate, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sally Kendall
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Michael Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Katie L. Harron
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Channon S, Coulman E, Cannings-John R, Henley J, Lau M, Lugg-Widger F, Strange H, Davies F, Sanders J, Scherf C, Couzens Z, Morantz L. Acceptability and feasibility of a planned preconception weight loss intervention in women with long-acting reversible contraception: the Plan-it mixed-methods study. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-224. [PMID: 36688498 PMCID: PMC9885302 DOI: 10.3310/nkix8285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with overweight (a body mass index of ≥ 25 kg/m2) or obesity (a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m2) are at greater risk of experiencing complications during pregnancy and labour than women with a healthy weight. Women who remove their long-acting reversible contraception (i.e. coils or implants) are one of the few groups of people who contact services as part of their preparation for conception, creating an opportunity to offer a weight loss intervention. OBJECTIVES The objectives were to understand if routine NHS data captured the pathway from long-acting reversible contraception removal to pregnancy and included body mass index; to identify the suitable components of a preconception weight loss intervention; and to engage with key stakeholders to determine the acceptability and feasibility of asking women with overweight/obesity to delay the removal of their long-acting reversible contraception in order to take part in a preconception weight loss intervention. DESIGN This was a preparatory mixed-methods study, assessing the acceptability and feasibility of a potential intervention, using routine NHS data and purposefully collected qualitative data. PARTICIPANTS The NHS routine data included all women with a long-acting reversible contraception code. There were three groups of participants in the surveys and interviews: health-care practitioners who remove long-acting reversible contraception; weight management consultants; and women of reproductive age with experience of overweight/obesity and of using long-acting reversible contraception. SETTING UK-based health-care practitioners recruited at professional meetings; and weight management consultants and contraceptive users recruited via social media. DATA SOURCES Anonymised routine data from UK sexual health clinics and the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, including the Pregnancy Register; and online surveys and qualitative interviews with stakeholders. RESULTS The records of 2,632,871 women aged 16-48 years showed that 318,040 had at least one long-acting reversible contraception event, with 62% of records including a body mass index. Given the identified limitations of the routine NHS data sets, it would not be feasible to reliably identify women with overweight/obesity who request a long-acting reversible contraception removal with an intention to become pregnant. Online surveys were completed by 100 health-care practitioners, four weight management consultants and 243 contraceptive users. Ten health-care practitioners and 20 long-acting reversible contraception users completed qualitative interviews. A realist-informed approach generated a hypothesised programme theory. The combination of weight discussions and the delay of long-acting reversible contraception removal was unacceptable as an intervention to contraceptive users for ethical and practical reasons. However, a preconception health intervention incorporating weight loss could be acceptable, and one potential programme is outlined. LIMITATIONS There was very limited engagement with weight management consultants, and the sample of participating stakeholders may not be representative. CONCLUSIONS An intervention that asks women to delay long-acting reversible contraception removal to participate in a preconception weight loss intervention would be neither feasible nor acceptable. A preconception health programme, including weight management, would be welcomed but requires risk communication training of health-care practitioners. FUTURE WORK Work to improve routine data sets, increase awareness of the importance of preconception health and overcome health-care practitioner barriers to discussing weight as part of preconception care is a priority. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN14733020. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Channon
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Elinor Coulman
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Josie Henley
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mandy Lau
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | - Freya Davies
- The Welsh Centre for Primary and Emergency Care Research (PRIME), Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Julia Sanders
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Caroline Scherf
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Department of Sexual Health, Cardiff Royal Infirmary, Cardiff, UK
| | - Zoë Couzens
- Public Health Wales NHS Trust, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Leah Morantz
- 1Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- 2The Welsh Centre for Primary and Emergency Care Research (PRIME), Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- 3School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- 4Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Department of Sexual Health, Cardiff Royal Infirmary, Cardiff, UK
- 5Public Health Wales NHS Trust, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cavallaro F, Cannings-John R, Lugg-Widger F, Kendall S, van der Meulen J, Kennedy E, Howarth E, Robling M, Gilbert R, Harron K. Challenges and lessons learned from Scotland and England using linked administrative data to evaluate the Family Nurse Partnership: two administrative data cohort studies. Lancet 2022; 400 Suppl 1:S28. [PMID: 36929971 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02238-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) is an early intervention aiming to support adolescent mothers and their children. The FNP has been evaluated in England and Scotland in two separate studies using linked administrative data from health, education, and social care. We aimed to make recommendations for studies using linked administrative data to evaluate public health interventions. METHODS We constructed two cohorts of all mothers aged 13-19 years giving birth in NHS hospitals between 2010 and 2016-17 using data from Hospital Episode Statistics (England) and Maternity Inpatient and Day Case (Scotland). FNP participation was identified through linkage to FNP programme data. We also linked to health, educational, and social care data for mothers and their babies (data from the National Pupil Database and electronic Data Research and Innovation Service). Ethical approval was obtained but no consent was required because we used secondary data. We used these data to evaluate the effect of the FNP on maternal and child outcomes. FINDINGS Key challenges included characterising the intervention and usual care, understanding quality of multi-sector data linkage, data access delays, constructing appropriate comparator groups, and interpreting outcomes captured in administrative data. Lessons learned included that evaluations required detailed data on intervention activity (dates and geography) and assessment of usual care, which are rarely readily available and are time-consuming to gather; data linkage quality information was variable or not available, making defining denominators challenging; data access delays impeded on data analysis time; and unmeasured confounders not captured in administrative data possibly prevented the generation of an appropriate comparator group. We recommend that characteristics informing targeting should be explicitly documented, and could be enhanced by using linked primary care data and information on household members (eg, fathers). Process evaluation and qualitative research could help to provide a better understanding of mechanisms of effect. INTERPRETATION Linkage of administrative data presents opportunities for efficient evaluation of large-scale, complex public health interventions. However, sufficient information is needed on programme metadata, targeting, and important confounders to generate meaningful results. Our findings should help to stimulate exploration by practitioners about how such programmes can be improved. FUNDING National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ruth Gilbert
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Katie Harron
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Channon S, Coulman E, Cannings-John R, Henley J, Lau M, Lugg-Widger F, Strange H, Davies F, Sanders J, Scherf C, Couzens Z, Morantz L. The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:778. [PMID: 36258184 PMCID: PMC9580156 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Having a body mass index (BMI) which is classified as overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese (BMI ≥ 30) increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and labour. Weight-management interventions which target excess gestational weight gain during pregnancy have had limited success. Women who use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) are in contact with services as part of their preparation for conception, creating a potential opportunity to offer a preconception weight-loss intervention. The aims of this mixed methods study were to assess the acceptability and practicability of a weight-loss intervention which asked people to delay LARC removal in order to lose weight before conceiving. Methods Routine UK NHS data were analysed to identify pathways from LARC removal to pregnancy. Qualitative surveys and advisory group discussions with service providers and LARC users with experience of being overweight were conducted and analysed thematically. Results Three hundred fifteen thousand seven hundred fifty-five UK women aged 16–48 years between 2009–2018 had at least one LARC-related event (e.g. insertion, removal) and 1.7% of those events were recorded as related to planning a pregnancy. BMI was included in 62% of women’s records, with 54% of those BMI being classified as overweight or obese. Online surveys were completed by 100 healthcare practitioners and 243 LARC users. Stakeholders identified facilitators and barriers associated with the proposed intervention including sensitivities of discussing weight, service-user past experiences, practitioner skills, the setting and ethical implications of the proposed intervention. Conclusions Although women and service providers recognised potential benefits, a preconception weight-loss intervention asking people to delay LARC removal posed many barriers, due mainly to the acceptability of such an intervention to women and healthcare practitioners. Weight-loss interventions that target the general population, together with a focus on improving public knowledge of preconception health, may be more acceptable than interventions which solely focus on LARC users. Many of the barriers identified, including communication, understanding and beliefs about weight and risk, appointment systems and the limitations of routine datasets also have relevance for any preconception weight-loss intervention. Work to improve routine datasets and reducing communication barriers to discussing weight are priorities. Trial registration ISRCTN14733020 registered 10.05.2019. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Channon
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
| | - Elinor Coulman
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Rebecca Cannings-John
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Josie Henley
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Mandy Lau
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Heather Strange
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Freya Davies
- The Welsh Centre for Primary and Emergency Care Research (PRIME), Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Julia Sanders
- School of Healthcare Sciences, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Ty Dewi Sant, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Caroline Scherf
- Department of Sexual Health, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff Royal Infirmary, Newport Road, Cardiff, CF24 0SZ, UK
| | - Zoe Couzens
- Health Protection, Public Health Wales NHS Trust, Public Health Wales, 4th Floor Number 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Waters CS, Cannings-John R, Channon S, Lugg-Widger F, Robling M, Paine AL. The impact of a specialist home-visiting intervention on the language outcomes of young mothers and their children: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychol 2022; 10:224. [PMID: 36151554 PMCID: PMC9508755 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-00926-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young mothers are more likely to provide a suboptimal early language environment for their children who in turn show impairments in their language development, yet few studies have used observational methods to assess the effectiveness of home-visiting programmes in improving the language outcomes of young mothers and their children. The Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) is a licensed home-visiting intervention developed in the USA and introduced into practice in England. The intervention involves up to 64 structured home visits from early pregnancy until the child's second birthday by specially recruited and trained Family Nurses. We assessed the effectiveness of FNP in improving the language outcomes of first-time teenage mothers and their infants. METHOD We conducted a pragmatic, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial to test whether the FNP programme improved mothers' and children's language production at 24 months postpartum. Eligible participants were nulliparous, aged 19 years or younger, and were recruited at less than 25 weeks' gestation from community midwifery settings (Country). Pregnant young mothers were randomly assigned to FNP plus usual care (n = 243) or usual care alone (n = 233). At 24 months postpartum, mother-child dyads were observed during a standardised free-play task with their first-born child and features of their language production was coded. Data was analysed using multi-level modelling; linear or poisson/negative binomial regression models were used as appropriate. RESULTS A small effect of FNP on mothers' productive language was detected, where mothers in the FNP group demonstrated higher mean length of utterances than mothers who received usual care alone, mean difference (adjusted by minimisation variables and by site, linear regression) = 0.10, p < .05, 95% CI (0.004-0.20), d = .18. No differences were detected between groups regarding other characteristics of maternal language or children's language outcomes. CONCLUSION This observational study conducted within the context of a randomised-controlled trial suggests that the FNP home-visiting programme may have a small, but potentially important impact on young mothers' speech to their toddlers. Exploratory analyses identified family environment, maternal, and child related predictors of the language outcomes of young mothers and their offspring. Trial registration This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN23019866, 20/04/2009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cerith S Waters
- Cardiff University Centre for Human Developmental Science, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK.
| | - Rebecca Cannings-John
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, Wales, UK
| | - Susan Channon
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, Wales, UK
| | - Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, Wales, UK
| | - Mike Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, Wales, UK
| | - Amy L Paine
- Cardiff University Centre for Human Developmental Science, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Robling M, Cannings-John R, Lugg-Widger F. Using multiple routine data sources linked to a trial cohort to establish the longer-term effectiveness of specialist home visiting in England: main results of the BB:2-6 study of the Family Nurse Partnership. Int J Popul Data Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesThe Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) is a specialist home-visiting programme for first-time teenage mothers. Developed in the US, short-term outcomes (by age 2 years) were established in England in the Building Blocks trial. We used routine data (health, education, social care) linked to our trial cohort to assess longer-term impact.
ApproachMothers recruited to the trial and their first-born children were linked to health (Hospital Episode Statistics/HES: NHS Digital; Abortion statistics: Department of Health and Social Care), education/social care (National Pupil Database/NPD: Department for Education) data in England up to age 7-years. Analysis of data within in a trusted-research environment assessed programme impact upon child maltreatment, child development/educational and maternal life course outcomes when compared to usually provided health and social care support alone. Our primary outcome was child in need registration. Planned sub-group analysis included differential effects by maternal age, deprivation level, care experience and for child outcomes, sex.
ResultsMatch rates for 1547 children were 97.4% (NPD) and 98.3% (HES). We found no difference between trial arms in proportion of children assessed as in need (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) OR:0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74 to 1.31). Aside from a longer duration in care for children in the usual care arm (two months), there were no other differences in maltreatment outcomes. Children in the FNP arm were more likely to achieve a good level of development at reception age at age 4-5 years (aOR:1.24, 95%CI: 1.01 to 1.52) and, after adjusting for month of birth, to reach the expected standard in reading at Key Stage 1 at age around 7 years (aOR:1.26, 95%CI: 1.02 to 1.57).
ConclusionsWe found programme improvements for child development/educational achievement but not for child maltreatment outcomes. Additional sub-group analysis revealed some evidence of the programme benefiting mothers with greater baseline vulnerability and boys, consistent with previous trials. The study benefits from the linkage of administrative data to a previously randomised trial cohort.
Collapse
|
10
|
Westlake D, Munnery K, Adara L, Meister L, Pallmann P, Petrou S, White J, Lugg-Widger F. Evaluating a school-based intervention through routine local authority data and national school data: Challenges and opportunities. Int J Popul Data Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesThe Department for Education funded local authorities (LAs) in England to embed social workers into schools (SWIS) so that they can work more effectively with teachers, children and families. A two-arm cluster randomised-controlled trial is evaluating the effect of SWIS compared to schools without on referrals to Children’s Social Care.
ApproachLAs collate information about all children who are referred to Children’s Social Care within their authority. A case report form has been developed by the trial team to collect school-level information on child protection enquiries, referrals, child in need assessments and numbers of days children spent in state care. Cost data are also included for an economic evaluation. LAs return a completed dataset each quarter, reporting aggregate numbers by school and year group. Data on attendance and attainment will be requested separately from the National Pupil Database (NPD) in 2023.
ResultsQuarterly (n=6) data was supplied for 291 schools across 21 LAs. We will focus on this method of data collection and its challenges and opportunities. Relying on 21 external parties to provide all trial data in a timely manner brought risks to the collation of trial outcome data but has reduced the overall costs of data collection. LAs work with a number of different (and changing) IT systems, many of which are not compatible with each other. This, along with personnel changes in data teams, has led to delays. Receiving aggregate data limits the amount of quality control possible, therefore detailed guidance mitigated potential data input errors. Working with LAs to develop and refine these guidance materials at the outset paid dividends.
ConclusionUsing routine LA data is a novel cost-efficient approach to collecting trial outcome data at scale. However, the disjointed and varying data architecture that exists in LAs presents practical challenges. This means we relied on good working relationships with the LAs, including regular communication and collaborative problem solving.
Collapse
|
11
|
Cavallaro F, Cannings-John R, Lugg-Widger F, Van der Meulen J, Gilbert R, Kennedy E, Robling M, Harron K. Challenges and lessons learned from two countries using linked administrative data to evaluate the Family Nurse Partnership. Int J Popul Data Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesWe describe the challenges and lessons learned from two studies using linked administrative data from health, education and social care sectors to evaluate the Family Nurse Partnership (FNP), an intervention supporting adolescent mothers in England(E) and Scotland(S). We present recommendations for studies using linked administrative data to evaluate complex interventions.
ApproachWe constructed two cohorts of all mothers aged 13-19 giving birth in NHS hospitals in England and Scotland between 2010-2016/17 using linkage of mothers and babies in hospital admissions data (E:Hospital Episode Statistics/S:Maternity Inpatient and Day Case), and identified FNP participation through linkage to FNP programme data. We additionally linked to health, educational and social care data for mothers and their babies (E:National Pupil Database/S:eDRIS). We used these data to identify key risk factors for enrolment in the FNP, assess the effect of the FNP on maternal and child outcomes, and determine programme characteristics modifying the effect of the FNP.
ResultsKey challenges: characterising the intervention and usual care, understanding quality of multi-sector data linkage, data access delays, constructing appropriate comparator groups and interpreting outcomes captured in administrative data. Lessons learned: evaluations require detailed data on intervention activity (dates/geography), and assessment of usual care, which are rarely readily available and are time-consuming to gather; data linkage quality is variable/not available, making defining denominators challenging; data access delays impeded on data analysis time; unmeasured confounders not captured in administrative data may prevent generation of an appropriate comparator group. Recommendations: Characteristics informing targeting should be explicitly documented, and could be enhanced using linked primary care data and information on household members (e.g. fathers). Process evaluation and qualitative research could help to provide better understanding of mechanisms of effect.
ConclusionLinkage of administrative data presents exciting opportunities for efficient evaluation of large-scale, complex public health interventions. However, sufficient information is needed on programme meta-data, targeting and important confounders in order to generate meaningful results. Study findings should help stimulate exploration with practitioners about how programmes can be improved.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cannings-John R, Lugg-Widger F, Robling M, Schoenbuchner S, Jones H. What are the risks for Domiciliary Care Workers in Wales from COVID-19? Int J Popul Data Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesDomiciliary care workers (DCWs) continued to provide social care to vulnerable adults in their own homes throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, evidence of pandemic impact upon DCWs’ health is mixed. The OSCAR study aimed to quantify the impact of COVID-19 upon health outcomes of DCWs in Wales, and explore causes of variation.
ApproachData for all registered DCWs in Wales are newly available via the SAIL Databank using a secured, privacy-protecting encrypted anonymisation process. Occupational registration data for DCWs working during the pandemic was combined with electronic health records data to describe health outcomes within the first two years of the pandemic. Rates of confirmed COVID-19 infections and health outcomes including mental health contacts, fit notes, respiratory infections, and mortality will be reported and explore variation (by factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation quintile, employer). We will also explore changes over time (pre- and post- onset of COVID-19 pandemic) in outcomes.
ResultsThe OSCAR study used anonymised health records for 15,727 registered DCWs in Wales. PCR-confirmed infection rates in the first full year of the pandemic (March20-February21) were 12% although lower in males (9%) than for females (12%). However, 28% of care workers received care for mental health with large differences observed between males (20%) and females (29%), and between workers from different health board regions (range 22% to 33%). The extent to which these represent pre-pandemic rates overall and how they compare to the broader community will be explored in our remaining work. A qualitative sub-study involving interviews with DCWs has informed our approach to modelling and to interpretation of findings.
ConclusionUsing novel anonymised occupational records at a national level and existing linked EHR data and qualitative interviews, the OSCAR study will quantify the risk of COVID-19 on DCWs' health and explore sources of variation. This will provide a secure base for informing public health policy and occupational guidance.
Collapse
|
13
|
Cannings-John R, Robling M, Lugg-Widger F, White J, Sanders J, Lau M. Evaluating the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in Scotland: a natural experiment using linked data from health, education and social care. Int J Popul Data Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesThe Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) is an intensive home visiting service for teenage first-time mothers, developed/trialled in the US and adapted/trialled across Europe. The Scottish Government aims to build on and supplement the existing evidence base for FNP, to assess effectiveness of the programme, for future improvement work in Scotland.
ApproachThe commissioned natural experiment of FNP, takes advantage of existing information infrastructures in Scotland from health, education and social care and FNP programme implementation data. A cohort design was used covering ten Health Boards in Scotland. The cohort included first-time teenage mothers enrolled as FNP Clients between 2010 and 2016 and women who met FNP eligibility criteria but were pregnant when the programme was not recruiting (Controls). Outcomes are mapped to the Scottish FNP logic model and include those being tested statistically (n=34) or, where direction of effect is uncertain, outcomes are rare or data quality poor, descriptively (n=20).
ResultsWe established a model of data linkage to routine Scottish data. Approvals were obtained to access data on over 8000 mothers (FNP Clients and Controls) and their children which formed the study cohort and were mapped to routine health, education and social care data. Outcomes covered maternal (health (smoking, alcohol/drugs), subsequent pregnancies/births, education) and child (health, development, education, protection) domains. Observed baseline imbalances between study arms will be described and adjusted for in modelling. Results will be published by the time of the conference and include sensitivity analyses that explore a priori sub-groups, variation by health board, year of booking and programme dosage.
ConclusionThe impact of this evaluation will establish a robustly matched study cohort, develop the evidence base on FNP in Scotland and internationally, develop a more streamlined linkage and approval process, and identify outcomes for short-term follow-up and importantly for a longer-term follow-up of the mothers and their children.
Collapse
|
14
|
Westlake D, Pallmann P, Lugg-Widger F, Forrester D, Petrou S, Daher S, Adara L, Cook L, Munnery K, Bennett V, Smith P, White J. The SWIS trial: Protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of school based social work. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265354. [PMID: 35679281 PMCID: PMC9182565 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Child and family social workers in the UK work closely with other agencies including schools and the police, and typically they are based in local authority offices. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of placing social workers in schools (SWIS) on the need for social care interventions. SWIS was piloted in three local authorities in 2018-2020, and findings from a feasibility study of the pilots suggests SWIS may operate through three key pathways: (1) by enhancing schools' response to safeguarding issues, (2) through increased collaboration between social workers, school staff, and parents, and (3) by improving relationships between social workers and young people. METHODS The study is a two-arm pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial building on three feasibility studies which found SWIS to be promising. Social workers will work within secondary schools across local authorities in England. 280 mainstream secondary schools will be randomly allocated with a 1:1 ratio to SWIS or a comparison arm, which will be schools that continue as normal, without a social worker. The primary outcome will be the rate of Child Protection (Section 47) enquiries. Secondary outcomes will comprise rate of referrals to children's social care, rate of Child in Need (Section 17) assessments, days spent in care, and educational attendance and attainment. The study also includes an economic evaluation, and an implementation and process evaluation. Social care outcomes will be measured in July 2022, and educational outcomes will be measured in July 2023. Days in care will be measured at both time points. DISCUSSION Findings will explore the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SWIS on the need for social care interventions. A final report will be published in January 2024. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered retrospectively with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry on 13.11.2020 (ISRCTN90922032).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philip Pallmann
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales
| | | | | | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of primary care, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Shahd Daher
- Nuffield Department of primary care, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Adara
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales
| | - Laura Cook
- CASCADE, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales
| | - Kim Munnery
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales
| | | | | | - James White
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lugg-Widger F, Munnery K, Townson J, Trubey R, Robling M. Identifying researcher learning needs to develop online training for UK researchers working with administrative data: CENTRIC training. Int J Popul Data Sci 2022; 7:1712. [PMID: 35310556 PMCID: PMC8900594 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of administrative data in health and social science research continues to expand, with increased availability of data and interest from funders. Researchers, however, continue to experience delays in access, storage and sharing of administrative data. Training opportunities are limited and typically specific to individual data providers or focussed on the analytical aspects of working with administrative data. The CENTRIC study was funded by the Information Commissioners Office, with the aim of developing a broader training curriculum for researchers working with administrative data in the UK. METHODS A mixed-methods design informed curriculum content, including surveys with researchers, focus group discussions with data providers and workshops with members of the public. Researchers were identified from relevant administrative data networks and invited to participate in an online survey identifying training needs. Data providers were approached with a request to input to a face-to-face or online meeting with two members of the research team about their experiences of working with researchers. Data were analysed within the broad framework of the interview schedule, free text responses in the survey were analysed thematically. RESULTS 107 researchers responded to the online survey and four data providers participated in the focus groups. We identified five main themes, relating to research training needs for UK researchers working with administrative data: communication; timelines; changes & amendments; future-proofing applications; and, the availability of training and support. Data providers either provided additional evidence on these learning needs or ways to address identified challenges. Six modules were developed addressing these training needs. Quotes from the survey and focus groups are used anonymously in the online training modules. CONCLUSION The CENTRIC online training curriculum was launched in September 2020 and is available, free of charge for UK researchers. CENTRIC specifically addresses commonly identified training needs of researchers working with administrative data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim Munnery
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| | - Julia Townson
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| | - Rob Trubey
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| | - Michael Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS,DECIPHer - Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff. CF10 3BD
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Coulman E, Gore N, Moody G, Wright M, Segrott J, Gillespie D, Petrou S, Lugg-Widger F, Kim S, Bradshaw J, McNamara R, Jahoda A, Lindsay G, Shurlock J, Totsika V, Stanford C, Flynn S, Carter A, Barlow C, Hastings R. Early positive approaches to support for families of young children with intellectual disability: the E-PAtS feasibility RCT. Public Health Res 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/heyy3556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Parents of children with intellectual disability are 1.5–2 times more likely than other parents to report mental health difficulties. There is a lack of clinically effective and cost-effective group well-being interventions designed for family carers of young children with intellectual disability.
Aim
To examine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Early Positive Approaches to Support (E-PAtS) intervention.
Design
A feasibility study (including randomisation of families into a two-arm trial), questionnaires to assess the feasibility of proposed outcome measures (including resource use and health-related quality of life) and practitioner/family carer interviews. An additional question was included in an online UK survey of families, conducted by the research team to assess usual practice, and a survey of provider organisations.
Setting
Families recruited from community contexts (i.e. third sector, local authority services, special schools) and self-referral. The E-PAtS intervention was delivered by trained community-based providers.
Participants
Families with at least one child aged 1.5–5 years with an intellectual disability. At least one parent had to have English-language ability (spoken) for E-PAtS programme participation and participants had to provide informed consent.
Interventions
E-PAtS intervention – two caregivers from each family invited to eight 2.5-hour group sessions with usual practice. Usual practice – other support provided to the family, including other parenting support.
Objectives
To assess randomisation willingness/feasibility, recruitment of providers/parents, retention, usual practice, adherence, fidelity and feasibility of proposed outcome measures (including the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale as the proposed primary outcome measure, and parent anxiety/depression, parenting, family functioning/relationships, child behavioural/emotional problems and adaptive skills, child and parent quality of life, and family services receipt as the proposed secondary outcome measures).
Results
Seventy-four families (95 carers) were recruited from three sites (with 37 families allocated to the intervention). From referrals, the recruitment rate was 65% (95% confidence interval 56% to 74%). Seventy-two per cent of families were retained at the 12-month follow-up (95% confidence interval 60% to 81%). Exploratory regression analysis showed that the mean Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale well-being score was 3.96 points higher in the intervention group (95% confidence interval –1.39 to 9.32 points) at 12 months post randomisation. High levels of data completeness were achieved on returned questionnaires. Interviews (n = 25) confirmed that (1) recruitment, randomisation processes and the intervention were acceptable to family carers, E-PAtS facilitators and community staff; (2) E-PAtS delivery were consistent with the logic model; and (3) researchers requesting consent in future for routine data would be acceptable. Recorded E-PAtS sessions demonstrated good fidelity (96% of components present). Adherence (i.e. at least one carer from the family attending five out of eight E-PAtS sessions) was 76%. Health-related quality-of-life and services receipt data were gathered successfully. An online UK survey to assess usual practice (n = 673) showed that 10% of families of young children with intellectual disability received any intervention over 12 months. A provider survey (n = 15) indicated willingness to take part in future research.
Limitations
Obtaining session recordings for fidelity was difficult. Recruitment processes need to be reviewed to improve diversity and strategies are needed to improve primary outcome completion.
Conclusions
Study processes were feasible. The E-PAtS intervention was well received and outcomes for families were positive. A barrier to future organisation participation is funding for intervention costs. A definitive trial to test the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of E-PAtS would be feasible.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN70419473.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 10, No. 2. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor Coulman
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Nick Gore
- Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | - Melissa Wright
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jeremy Segrott
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Sungwook Kim
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew Jahoda
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Geoff Lindsay
- Centre for Educational Development Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Vaso Totsika
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Stanford
- Centre for Educational Development Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Samantha Flynn
- Centre for Educational Development Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | - Richard Hastings
- Centre for Educational Development Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Coulman E, Gore N, Moody G, Wright M, Segrott J, Gillespie D, Petrou S, Lugg-Widger F, Kim S, Bradshaw J, McNamara R, Jahoda A, Lindsay G, Shurlock J, Totsika V, Stanford C, Flynn S, Carter A, Barlow C, Hastings RP. Early Positive Approaches to Support (E-PAtS) for Families of Young Children With Intellectual Disability: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:729129. [PMID: 34992552 PMCID: PMC8725992 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.729129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Parents of children with intellectual disabilities are likely to experience poorer mental well-being and face challenges accessing support. Early Positive Approaches to Support (E-PAtS) is a group-based programme, co-produced with parents and professionals, based on existing research evidence and a developmental systems approach to support parental mental well-being. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of community service provider organisations delivering E-PAtS to parents/family caregivers of young children with intellectual disability, to inform a potential definitive randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of E-PAtS. Methods: This study was a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial, with embedded process evaluation. Up to two parents/family caregivers of a child (18 months to <6 years old) with intellectual disability were recruited at research sites and allocated to intervention (E-PAtS and usual practise) or control (usual practise) on a 1:1 basis at cluster (family) level. Data were collected at baseline and 3 and 12 months' post-randomisation. The following feasibility outcomes were assessed: participant recruitment rates and effectiveness of recruitment pathways; retention rates; intervention adherence and fidelity; service provider recruitment rates and willingness to participate in a future trial; barriers and facilitating factors for recruitment, engagement, and intervention delivery; and feasibility of collecting outcome measures. Results: Seventy-four families were randomised to intervention or control (n = 37). Retention rates were 72% at 12 months post-randomisation, and completion of the proposed primary outcome measure (WEMWBS) was 51%. Recruitment of service provider organisations and facilitators was feasible and intervention implementation acceptable. Adherence to the intervention was 76% and the intervention was well-received by participants; exploratory analyses suggest that adherence and attendance may be associated with improved well-being. Health economic outcome measures were collected successfully and evidence indicates that linkage with routine data would be feasible in a future trial. Conclusions: The E-PAtS Feasibility RCT has demonstrated that the research design and methods of intervention implementation are generally feasible. Consideration of the limitations of this feasibility trial and any barriers to conducting a future definitive trial, do however, need to be considered by researchers. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.isrctn.com, identifier: ISRCTN70419473.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor Coulman
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Gore
- Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Cornwallis North East, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Gwenllian Moody
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Wright
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Segrott
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - David Gillespie
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Sungwook Kim
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jill Bradshaw
- Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Cornwallis North East, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel McNamara
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Jahoda
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Geoff Lindsay
- Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | | | - Vaso Totsika
- Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Catherine Stanford
- Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Flynn
- Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Annabel Carter
- Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Cornwallis North East, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Barlow
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Richard P. Hastings
- Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
- Centre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
McCarthy M, O'Keeffe L, Williamson PR, Sydes MR, Farrin A, Lugg-Widger F, Davies G, Avery K, Chan AW, Kwakkenbos L, Thombs BD, Watkins A, Hemkens LG, Gale C, Zwarenstein M, Langan SM, Thabane L, Juszczak E, Moher D, Kearney PM. A study protocol for the development of a SPIRIT extension for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (SPIRIT-ROUTINE). HRB Open Res 2021; 4:82. [PMID: 34877471 PMCID: PMC8609390 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13314.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Protocols are an essential document for conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, the completeness of the information provided is often inadequate. To help improve the content of trial protocols, an international group of stakeholders published the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) Initiative in 2013. Presently, there is increasing use of cohorts and routinely collected data (RCD) for RCTs because these data have the potential to improve efficiencies by facilitating recruitment, simplifying, and reducing the cost of data collection. Reporting guidelines have been shown to improve the quality of reporting, but there is currently no specific SPIRIT guidance on protocols for trials conducted using cohorts and RCD. This protocol outlines steps for developing SPIRIT-ROUTINE, which aims to address this gap by extending the SPIRIT guidance to protocols for trials conducted using cohorts and RCD. Methods: The development of the SPIRIT-ROUTINE extension comprises five stages. Stage 1 consists of a project launch and a meeting to finalise the membership of the steering group and scope of the extension. In Stage 2, a rapid review will be performed to identify possible modifications to the original SPIRIT 2013 checklist. Other key reporting guidelines will be reviewed to identify areas where additional items may be needed, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension for trials conducted using cohorts and RCD (CONSORT-ROUTINE). Stage 3 will involve an online Delphi exercise, consisting of two rounds and involving key international stakeholders to gather feedback on the preliminary checklist items. In Stage 4, a consensus meeting of the SPIRIT-ROUTINE steering group will finalise the items to include in the extension. Stage 5 will involve the publication preparation and dissemination of the final checklist. Conclusion: The SPIRIT-ROUTINE extension will contribute to improving design of trials using cohorts and RCD and transparency of reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan McCarthy
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland
| | - Linda O'Keeffe
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland
| | - Paula R. Williamson
- MRC/NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership, Department of Health Data Science, a member of Liverpool Health Partners, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| | - Matthew R. Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- CTRU at Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Gwyneth Davies
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Kerry Avery
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre and Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, 1QU BS8, UK
| | - An-Wen Chan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Linda Kwakkenbos
- Department of Psychology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6525 XZ, The Netherlands
| | - Brett D. Thombs
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Alan Watkins
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK
| | - Lars G. Hemkens
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Chris Gale
- Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | | | - Sinead M. Langan
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Edmund Juszczak
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lugg-Widger F, Cannings-John R, Akbari A, Brookes-Howell L, Hood K, John A, Jones H, Prout H, Schoenbuchner S, Thomas D, Robling M. Establishing the impact of COVID-19 on the health outcomes of domiciliary care workers in Wales using routine data: a protocol for the OSCAR study. Int J Popul Data Sci 2021; 5:1656. [PMID: 34345715 PMCID: PMC8280712 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i4.1656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Domiciliary care workers (DCWs) continued providing social care to adults in their own homes throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence of the impact of COVID-19 on health outcomes of DCWs is currently mixed, probably reflecting methodological limitations of existing studies. The risk of COVID-19 to workers providing care in people’s homes remains unknown. Objectives To quantify the impact of COVID-19 upon health outcomes of DCWs in Wales, to explore causes of variation, and to extrapolate to the rest of the UK DCW population. Methods Mixed methods design comprising cohort study of DCWs and exploratory qualitative interviews. Data for all registered DCWs in Wales is available via the SAIL Databank using a secured, privacy-protecting encrypted anonymisation process. Occupational registration data for DCWs working during the pandemic will be combined with EHR outcome data within the SAIL Databank including clinical codes that identify suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases. We will report rates of suspected and confirmed COVID-19 infections and key health outcomes including mortality and explore variation (by factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation quintile, rurality, employer, comorbidities) using regression modelling, adjusting for clustering of outcome within Health Board, region and employer. A maximum variation sample of Welsh DCWs will be approached for qualitative interview using a strategy to include participants that vary across factors such as sex, age, ethnicity and employer. The interviews will inform the quantitative analysis modelling. We will generalise the quantitative findings to other UK nations. Discussion Using anonymised linked occupational and EHR data and qualitative interviews, the OSCAR study will quantify the risk of COVID-19 on DCWs’ health and explore sources of variation. This will provide a secure base for informing public health policy and occupational guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ashley Akbari
- Health Data Research UK (HDR UK), Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP.,Administrative Data Research Wales, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP
| | | | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| | - Ann John
- Health Data Research UK (HDR UK), Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP.,Administrative Data Research Wales, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP.,DECIPHer - Centre for Develop-ment, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff. CF10 3BD
| | - Hywel Jones
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| | - Hayley Prout
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| | | | - Daniel Thomas
- Public Health Wales Communi-cable Disease Surveillance Centre
| | - Michael Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS.,DECIPHer - Centre for Develop-ment, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff. CF10 3BD
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Robling M, Lugg-Widger F, Cannings-John R, Sanders J, Angel L, Channon S, Fitzsimmons D, Hood K, Kenkre J, Moody G, Owen-Jones E, Pockett R, Segrott J, Slater T. The Family Nurse Partnership to reduce maltreatment and improve child health and development in young children: the BB:2–6 routine data-linkage follow-up to earlier RCT. Public Health Res 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/phr09020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
The short-term effectiveness (to 24 months post partum) of a preventative home-visiting intervention, the Family Nurse Partnership, was previously assessed in the Building Blocks trial (BB:0–2).
Objectives
The objectives were to establish the medium-term effectiveness of the Family Nurse Partnership in reducing maltreatment and improving maternal health (second pregnancies) and child health, developmental and educational outcomes (e.g. early educational attendance, school readiness); to explore effect moderators and mediators; and to describe the costs of enhancing usually provided health and social care with the Family Nurse Partnership.
Design
Children and their mothers from an existing trial cohort were followed up using routine data until the child was 7 years of age.
Setting
This study was set in 18 partnerships between local authorities and health-care organisations in England.
Participants
The participants were mothers [and their firstborn child(ren)] recruited as pregnant women aged ≤ 19 years, in local authority Family Nurse Partnership catchment areas, at < 25 weeks’ gestation, able to provide consent and able to converse in English. Participants mandatorily withdrawn (e.g. owing to miscarriage) from the BB:0–2 trial were excluded.
Interventions
The intervention comprised up to a maximum of 64 home visits by specially trained family nurses from early pregnancy until the firstborn child was 2 years of age, plus usually provided health and social care support. The comparator was usual care alone.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome measure was child-in-need status recorded at any time during follow-up. The secondary outcomes were as follows: (1) referral to social services, child protection registration (plan), child-in-need categorisation, looked-after status, recorded injuries and ingestions at any time during follow-up; (2) early child care and educational attendance, school readiness (Early Years Foundation Stage Profile score) and attainment at Key Stage 1; and (3) health-care costs.
Data sources
The following data sources were used: maternally reported baseline and follow-up data (BB:0–2), Hospital Episode Statistics data (NHS Digital), social care and educational data (National Pupil Database) and abortions data (Department of Health and Social Care).
Results
There were no differences between study arms in the rates of referral to social services, being registered as a child in need, receiving child protection plans, entering care or timing of first referral for children subsequently assessed as in need. There were no differences between study arms in rates of hospital emergency attendance, admission for injuries or ingestions, or in duration of stay for admitted children. Children in the Family Nurse Partnership arm were more likely to achieve a good level of development at reception age (school readiness), an effect strengthened when adjusting for birth month. Differences at Key Stage 1 were not statistically different, but, after adjusting for birth month, children in the Family Nurse Partnership arm were more likely to reach the expected standard in reading. Programme effects were greater for boys (Key Stage 1: writing); children of younger mothers (Key Stage 1: writing, Key Stage 1: mathematics); and children of mothers not in employment, education or training at study baseline (Key Stage 1: writing). There were no differences between families who were part of the Family Nurse Partnership and those who were not for any other outcome. The differences between study arms in resource use and costs were negligible.
Limitations
The outcomes are constrained to those available from routine sources.
Conclusions
There is no observable benefit of the programme for maltreatment or maternal outcomes, but it does generate advantages in school readiness and attainment at Key Stage 1.
Future work
The trajectory of longer-term programme benefits should be mapped using routine and participant-reported measures.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 9, No. 2. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | - Julia Sanders
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Lianna Angel
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sue Channon
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Joyce Kenkre
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| | | | | | - Rhys Pockett
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Jeremy Segrott
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Thomas Slater
- School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Buchanan E, Cannings-John R, Lugg-Widger F, Hood K, Butler C, Robling M. Assessing predictors of respiratory tract infections in infants born to teenage mothers: secondary analysis of the Building Blocks trial data. Fam Pract 2020; 37:623-630. [PMID: 32319514 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are estimated to account for 60% of infants' primary care visits. There is limited research into risk factors for infant RTIs in those born to teenage mothers. AIMS To identify risk factors for primary and secondary care RTI attendances, in infants of teenage mothers, and to identify risk factors associated with high primary care RTI consultations. METHOD Secondary analysis of a data set from the Building Blocks trial of special home visiting support in England containing 1510 infants born to teenage mothers recruited to the study. Maternally reported and routinely collected data were examined. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to determine independent predictors. Primary care data analysis also focused on infant risk factors for RTI consultation. RESULTS No independently predictive risk factors for infant RTI were identified in primary care. Lower maternal antenatal attendances (odds ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval = 0.92-0.99), infants born in autumn (vs. spring; 0.54, 0.36-0.80) and neonatal unit (NNU) admissions (0.51, 0.30-0.89) had increased odds of attending accidents and emergencies with an RTI. Male infants (1.52, 1.03-2.25), NNU admissions (3.21, 1.98-5.22) and birth season had increased odds of RTI-associated hospital admissions. High infant RTI primary care consulters were more likely to have an RTI-associated hospital admission (2.11, 1.17-3.81) and less likely to have breastfed (0.55, 0.38-0.78). CONCLUSION Risk factors previously found to increase the risk of an RTI infant admission in the broader population have been identified here. This study is one of the first to identify modifiable risk factors of high primary care RTI consulters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kerry Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff
| | - Christopher Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mike Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Coulman E, Hastings R, Gore N, Gillespie D, McNamara R, Petrou S, Segrott J, Bradshaw J, Hood K, Jahoda A, Lindsay G, Lugg-Widger F, Robling M, Shurlock J, Totsika V. The Early Positive Approaches to Support (E-PAtS) study: study protocol for a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a group programme (E-PAtS) for family caregivers of young children with intellectual disability. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:147. [PMID: 33024571 PMCID: PMC7532596 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00689-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Children with intellectual disability have an IQ < 70, associated deficits in adaptive skills and are at increased risk of having clinically concerning levels of behaviour problems. In addition, parents of children with intellectual disability are likely to report high levels of mental health and other psychological problems. The Early Positive Approaches to Support (E-PAtS) programme for family caregivers of young children (5 years and under) with intellectual and developmental disabilities is a group-based intervention which aims to enhance parental psychosocial wellbeing and service access and support positive development for children. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of delivering E-PAtS to family caregivers of children with intellectual disability by community parenting support service provider organisations. The study will inform a potential, definitive RCT of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of E-PAtS. Methods This study is a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial, with embedded process evaluation. Up to 2 family caregivers will be recruited from 64 families with a child (18 months to 5 years) with intellectual disability at research sites in the UK. Participating families will be allocated to intervention: control on a 1:1 basis; intervention families will be offered the E-PAtS programme immediately, continuing to receive usual practice, and control participants will be offered the opportunity to attend the E-PAtS programme at the end of the follow-up period and will continue to receive usual practice. Data will be collected at baseline, 3 months post-randomisation and 12 months post-randomisation. The primary aim is to assess feasibility via the assessment of: recruitment of service provider organisations; participant recruitment; randomisation; retention; intervention adherence; intervention fidelity and the views of participants, intervention facilitators and service provider organisations regarding intervention delivery and study processes. The secondary aim is preliminary evaluation of a range of established outcome measures for individual family members, subsystem relationships and overall family functioning, plus additional health economic outcomes for inclusion in a future definitive trial. Discussion The results of this study will inform a potential future definitive trial, to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the E-PAtS intervention to improve parental psychosocial wellbeing. Such a trial would have significant scientific impact internationally in the intellectual disability field. Trial registration ISRCTN70419473
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor Coulman
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Richard Hastings
- Centre for Educational Development Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Nick Gore
- Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Cornwallis North East, Canterbury, CT2 7NF UK
| | - David Gillespie
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Rachel McNamara
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Jeremy Segrott
- DECIPHer Centre Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD UK
| | - Jill Bradshaw
- Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Cornwallis North East, Canterbury, CT2 7NF UK
| | - Kerry Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Andrew Jahoda
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, G12 8RZ, Glasgow, UK
| | - Geoff Lindsay
- Centre for Educational Development Appraisal and Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Michael Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Jacqui Shurlock
- The Challenging Behaviour Foundation, The Old Courthouse, New Road Avenue, Chatham, Kent, ME4 6BE UK
| | - Vaso Totsika
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, Wing B, Maple House, Tottenham Court Road, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lugg-Widger F, Robling M, Lau M, Paranjothy S, Pell J, Sanders J, White J, Cannings-John R. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Family Nurse Partnership home visiting programme in first time young mothers in Scotland: a protocol for a natural experiment. Int J Popul Data Sci 2020; 5:1154. [PMID: 32935057 PMCID: PMC7473263 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Individual, social and economic circumstances faced by young mothers (19 years or under) can challenge a successful start in life for their children. Intervening early might enhance life chances for both mother and child. The Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) is an intensive nurse-led home visiting programme developed in the US which aims to improve prenatal health behaviours, birth outcomes, child development and health outcomes, and maternal life course. Establishing evidence of effectiveness beyond the original US setting is important to understand where further adaptation is required within a country specific context. Objective This study will form one strand of the Scottish Government’s plan to evaluate the effectiveness of FNP as compared to usual care for mothers and their children in Scotland and will focus only on outcomes that can be identified using routine administrative data systems. Methods This study is a natural experiment with a case-cohort design using linked anonymised routine health, educational and social care data. Cases will be women enrolled as FNP Clients in ten NHS Health Boards in Scotland and Controls will be women who met FNP eligibility criteria but were pregnant at a time when the programme was not recruiting. Outcomes are mapped to the Scottish FNP logic model. All comparative analyses will be pre-specified, conducted on an intention to treat basis and will use multilevel regression models to compare outcomes between groups. Discussion The study protocol is based upon the specification of FNP commissioned by the Scottish Government. This study design is novel for the evaluation of the FNP/NFP programmes which are primarily evaluated with an RCT. Outcomes included within the study have been selected on the basis that they are outcomes FNP aims to influence and where there is routine data available to assess the outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| | - M Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS.,Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3BD
| | - M Lau
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| | - S Paranjothy
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| | - J Pell
- Institute for Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ
| | - J Sanders
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN
| | - J White
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS.,Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3BD
| | - R Cannings-John
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4YS
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Paine AL, Cannings-John R, Channon S, Lugg-Widger F, Waters CS, Robling M. Assessing the impact of a family nurse-led intervention on young mothers' references to internal states. Infant Ment Health J 2020; 41:463-476. [PMID: 32045025 PMCID: PMC7497099 DOI: 10.1002/imhj.21849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
A mother's propensity to refer to internal states during mother–child interactions is important for her child's developing social understanding. However, adolescent mothers are less likely to reference internal states when interacting with their children. We investigated whether young mothers’ references to internal states are promoted by the Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) intervention, an intensive home‐visiting programme designed to support adolescent mothers in England. We also investigated family, maternal, and child factors associated with young mothers’ references to inner states during interactions with their children. Adolescent mothers (n = 483, aged ≤ 19 years when recruited in pregnancy) and their children participated in an observational substudy of a randomized controlled trial investigating the impact of FNP compared to usual care. Mother–child dyads were video‐recorded during free play, and mothers’ speech was coded for use of internal state language (references to cognitions, desires, emotions, intentions, preferences, physiology, and perception). We found no differences in mothers’ use of internal state language between the FNP and usual care groups. A sample‐wide investigation identified that other features of mothers’ language and relationship status with the child's father were associated with internal state language use. Findings are discussed with reference to targeted interventions and implications for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L Paine
- Cardiff University Centre for Human Developmental Science, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Susan Channon
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Cerith S Waters
- Cardiff University Centre for Human Developmental Science, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lugg-Widger F, Munnery K, Townson J, Robling M. Developing a training curriculum for researchers working with routine data: understanding professional and lay stakeholder priorities – The CENTRIC Study. Int J Popul Data Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i3.1259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundAnalysis of routine data makes an important contribution to service evaluation and research, providing cost-efficiencies, objective outcomes, burden reduction for patient and the public and is promoted by both policy and funders. Organisational, legal and ethical governance provide a framework for research but there is an onus on researchers to maintain their awareness of good practice when working with routine data.
Aim To co-produce with data provider, researcher and public stakeholders a training curriculum for researchers working with routine data.
Methods A curriculum for online and face-to-face training will be developed through consultations with three stakeholder groups. The first are researchers with existing interest /experience of using routine data. An online survey will be disseminated via UK research networks encompassing a range of disciplines and sectors. The non-probabilistic survey addresses current challenges, training experiences and learning preferences. Focus groups with three UK data provider organisations (SAIL, NHS Digital, National Pupil Database) will address provider’s experience of working with researchers, any training or support they either require, provide or sign-post to and opportunities to support best practice. Thirdly, a facilitated public consultation exercise using a deliberative enquiry process will be undertaken as a day’s workshop and include lay contributors identified via the HealthWise Wales cohort.
ResultsWe will present initial results from each stakeholder engagement activity and show how this has informed the draft training curriculum and our understanding of potential benefits that the training will deliver.
ConclusionsThe public may remain largely unaware of data captured when using public services, how it may contribute to research and the protections that apply. Involving the public in the development of researcher training informs this process and enables researchers to more effectively engage with patients and participants. Training will be promoted through data provider and research networks across sectors in the UK.
Collapse
|
26
|
Lugg-Widger F, Barlow C, Cannings-John R, Gale C, Milton R, Robling M, Sanders J. The safety of Waterbirth in the UK: a feasibility study of routine data linkage – The POOL Study. Int J Popul Data Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i3.1255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPOOL is a cohort study designed to establish whether waterbirth, compared to leaving a pool prior to birth, is as safe for mothers and infants. It is a novel case study using routine maternity and neonatal data for research purposes, including the adaptation and addition of locally collected electronic data at sites.
AimWe aimed to establish the feasibility of the study design, which combines data from maternity information systems(MIS) and neonatal data using a dissent-based linkage model and the addition of new variables into the MIS.
MethodsThe study will utilise individual level data entered into local MIS at 30 NHS Trusts linked with the National Neonatal Research Database(NNRD). New variables were added to one pilot site before rolling out to the remaining sites. A third party added the new variables, extracted data from the MIS to send to the study team and transferred data for matching to the NNRD, ensuring the study team receive only anonymised data. The feasibility study aimed to establish the quality and completion of the newly added variables, the levels of missingness for key outcomes from an extract of 4 years of retrospective data, and ensured the datasets could link using the study ID generated by our third party.
ResultsThe new variables were added into the MIS and data were extracted after a 10week pilot. New variables were present and had been entered as per specified metadata requirements. 23,140 records were extracted from the retrospective data and key variables assessed for missingness e.g.place of birth(<0.1% missing). The datasets could link using the studyID generated by the third party.
ConclusionThrough study set-up and in this pilot, we provide evidence that the main study is feasible, satisfies governance requirements and likely to generate data of sufficient quality to address our main research questions.
Collapse
|
27
|
Hughes K, Cannings-John R, Jones H, Lugg-Widger F, Lau M, Paranjothy S, Francis N, Hay A, Butler C, Van der Voort J, Hood K. Long-term outcomes of urinary tract infection (UTI) in childhood: The LUCI study. Int J Popul Data Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i3.1204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines recommend the prompt diagnosis and treatment of UTI in young children to reduce the risk of renal scarring and possible long-term complications. However, the evidence for this association is weak and has been questioned. There is an urgent need to clarify this as the correct approach to urine sampling and diagnosis of UTI in children hinges on this association.
Main Aim Determine outcomes following UTI in childhood (<5years)
Approach We used the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank to access demographic, hospital, GP and microbiology data from children in Wales. Children with >1 microbiologically confirmed UTI (mcUTI) aged <5, were compared to those with no mcUTI. The primary outcome was renal scarring and secondary outcomes included hypertension, chronic kidney disease and renal failure. The primary analysis used multinomial regression and time to event models.
Results A cohort of 159,201 children was defined. 11,099 (7.0%) had >1 mcUTI.
The overall prevalence of renal scarring in the cohort by age 7 was 0.16%; 1.26% in those with >1 mcUTI; 0.08% in those with no mcUTI. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) was 16.62 (12.91-21.39) and adjusted 3.64 (2.57-5.14). Among the group with >1 mcUTI, predictors of renal scarring were VUR, younger age of first UTI, and greater number of UTIs <5
Conclusion UTI was associated with renal scarring even after adjusting for covariates.
The prevalence of renal scarring in children with >1 mcUTI was lower than expected. Possible explanations include poor coding in routine data, different patient populations or missed renal scarring diagnoses. We are currently validating our results using radiology data. If renal scarring diagnoses are being missed, a more proactive urine sampling and imaging strategy may be indicated. However, if renal scarring rates are low following UTI, this may not be necessary.
Collapse
|
28
|
Aitken M, Tully MP, Porteous C, Denegri S, Cunningham-Burley S, Banner N, Black C, Burgess M, Cross L, van Delden JJM, Ford E, Fox S, Fitzpatrick NK, Gallacher K, Goddard C, Hassan L, Jamieson R, Jones KH, Kaarakainen M, Lugg-Widger F, McGrail K, McKenzie A, Moran R, Murtagh MJ, Oswald M, Paprica A, Perrin N, Richards EV, Rouse J, Webb J, Willison DJ. Consensus Statement on Public Involvement and Engagement with Data Intensive Health Research. Int J Popul Data Sci 2019; 4:586. [PMID: 34095528 PMCID: PMC8142968 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
This consensus statement reflects the deliberations of an international group of stakeholders with a range of expertise in public involvement and engagement (PI&E) relating to data-intensive health research. It sets out eight key principles to establish a secure role for PI&E in and with the research community internationally and ensure best practice in its execution. Our aim is to promote culture change and societal benefits through ensuring a socially responsible trajectory for innovations in this field.
Our key premise is that the public should not be characterised as a problem to be overcome but a key part of the solution to establish socially beneficial data-intensive health research for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mhairi Aitken
- University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, NINE Edinburgh BioQuarter, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX
| | - Mary P Tully
- University of Manchester, Div Pharmacy and Optometry, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Carol Porteous
- University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, NINE Edinburgh BioQuarter, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX
| | - Simon Denegri
- NIHR, INVOLVE, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, Southampton, SO16 7NS, UK
| | - Sarah Cunningham-Burley
- University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, NINE Edinburgh BioQuarter, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX
| | - Natalie Banner
- Wellcome Trust, Gibbs Building, 215 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE, UK
| | - Corri Black
- University of Aberdeen, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen Centre for Health Data Science, School of Medicine, Medical Science and Nutrition, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD
| | - Michael Burgess
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, School of Population and Public Health, 2206 East Mall Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z3
| | - Lynsey Cross
- Swansea University. Population Data Science, Medical School, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Johannes JM van Delden
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Centre for Health Sciences, Uniwersiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Elizabeth Ford
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Watson Building, University of Brighton, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PH, UK
| | - Sarah Fox
- University of Manchester, Div Pharmacy and Optometry, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | | | - Kay Gallacher
- HeRC Patient & Public Involvement (H@PPI) Forum, The Health eResearch Centre Vaughan House Portsmouth Street Manchester M13 9GB
| | - Catharine Goddard
- University of Dundee, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee, DD1 5EH, UK
| | - Lamiece Hassan
- University of Manchester, Div Pharmacy and Optometry, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Ron Jamieson
- Public Panel, Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, Scotland, UK
| | - Kerina H Jones
- Swansea University. Population Data Science, Medical School, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Minna Kaarakainen
- University of Helsinki, Center for Consumer Society Research, PL 24 (Unioninkatu 40) HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO Finland
| | - Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Cardiff University, Centre for Trials, 702C, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
| | - Kimberlyn McGrail
- University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, School of Population and Public Health, 2206 East Mall Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z3
| | - Anne McKenzie
- University of Western Australia, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Population and Global Health, 35 Stirling Highway, 6009 Perth Australia
| | | | - Madeleine J Murtagh
- Newcastle University, The School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Windsor Terrace, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HE , UK
| | - Malcolm Oswald
- University of Manchester, Div Pharmacy and Optometry, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Alison Paprica
- University of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Health Sciences Building,155 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | | | - Emma Victoria Richards
- Swansea University. Population Data Science, Medical School, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
- CIPHER Consumer Panel
| | - John Rouse
- Public Panel, Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, London, UK
| | - Joanne Webb
- Administrative Data Service (Administrative Data Research Network), University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK
| | - Donald J Willison
- University of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Health Sciences Building,155 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cannings-John R, Lugg-Widger F, Robling M, Paranjothy S, White J, Pell J, Sanders J. Evaluating the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in Scotland: a natural experiment approach. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionThe Family Nurse Partnership(FNP) is an intensive home-visiting service for teenage first-time mothers (and children), developed/trialled in the US and adapted/trialled across Europe.The Scottish Government(SG) aims to build on and supplement the existing national/international evidence base for FNP, to assess effectiveness and opportunities for optimisation of the programme, for future decision making in Scotland.
Objectives and ApproachThe evaluation commissioned is a natural experiment of FNP, taking advantage of the existing information infrastructure in Scotland. This natural experiment represents an important opportunity to determine programme impact upon many key programme outcomes using routinely collected data at a lower cost than a comparably sized effectiveness trial. Key objectives are: to identify clients in receipt of FNP-support and a control sample of matched families who would meet criteria for FNP but did not receive support, to obtain approval and through anonymised data linkage link to health and other data, and to determine the effect of FNP across a range of maternal and child outcomes.
ResultsThe succes of the natural experiment design in trying to replicate the gold standard design of the RCT will be presented and will cover the following topics: (how cases and a comparable group of first-time teenage women have been identified across 10 Health Boards (HBs) between 2009 and 2016 using data made available by the electronic Data Research and Innovation Service (eDRIS) from FNP, NHS Scotland and SG; the matching process of the cases and controls using propensity score methods to ensure an unbiased comparison; the linkage to health, social care and educational datasets and the approval processes involved, and the strengths and limitations of using routine data to evaluate relevant study outcomes that map to a logic model.
Conclusion/ImplicationsThe impact of this evaluation into the effectiveness of FNP in Scotland will establish a robustly matched study cohort, a more strealmined linkage and approval process, and identification of outcomes not only for a short-term follow-up but also for a longer-term follow-up of the teenage mothers and their children.
Collapse
|
30
|
Lugg-Widger F, Jones H, Angel L, Cannings-John R, Lau M, Hughes K. Defining a GP consultation. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionThe method used to define a GP-consultation using routine data will vary depending on the data source and research question. However, without consensus the approach will be tackled by numerous researchers and invariably result in different definitions. The LUCI study is assessing outcomes of childhood UTI using routine data sources.
Objectives and ApproachWe are interested in GP urine sampling rate and re-consultation rate. The GP dataset includes multiple clinical (acute, routine monitoring, prescribing, results) and administrative codes. A GP consultation therefore needed to be defined. GP read code frequencies for our study cohort of children were produced. One researcher reviewed the codes that represented 80% of the data and classified them as a consultation or not. Where there was uncertainty this was independently reviewed by two clinicians and discrepancies agreed by the management team.
ResultsWe will present the decisions and assumptions made for this study in defining a GP consultation. 25,623 Read Codes represented the consultations for our study cohort of which 460 codes represented 80% of the consultations. The remaining 20% of codes represented <0.032% of records each. The 460 Read Codes were reviewed and following independent review and agreement from the management group 149 Read Codes were excluded. These were grouped into the following categories Administrative (e.g. Incoming Mail Processing, Ethnicity codes), Vaccinations, Child Health (e.g. First Smiled), Asthma and Medication Review. The GP consultations to be included in the analysis were then restricted to exclude these codes. This has been an important step in cleaning and understanding the data prior to analysis.
Conclusion/ImplicationsA consultation was defined for this study however there will be pros and cons to this method. In lieu of a consensus approach to the method this work is the first step to sharing approaches to help researchers with the same challenge.
Collapse
|
31
|
Lugg-Widger F, Segrott J, Gee P, Kenkre J, Robling M. Getting animated about routine data: co-producing a video and toolkit with young families. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018. [DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionWhile public engagement activity in healthcare may include a focus on uses of patient data, use of social care/ education data may be relatively overlooked. The public may be less aware about how their social care data may be used. Some concepts such as benefits and risks may also differ.
Objectives and ApproachOur objective is to co-produce with members of the public a package of materials that researchers may then use to promote public understanding of and engagement in research that uses routine data from health and social care settings.
We are running workshops with two groups of young families (teenage mothers, some of whom have received specialist home-visiting support) to explore key concepts and messages about routine data use, including sensitive data such as maltreatment and regulatory child protection interventions. The workshop includes completing a story board for an animated video. This will be co-produced by the same young people.
ResultsOur recent work with young families has shown a preference for visual based methods over text-based approaches to explain routine data linkage. This represents a key opportunity for innovation. We have explored how members of the public understand and make sense of routine data from various settings (health/social care) and its use in research. Working with a professional animator, the co-production of a prototype animation aims to engage members of the public about the nature, benefits and safeguards of using routine public records in health and social care research. The presentation will summarise the method of co-production, review the prototype animation and associated materials for researchers (‘toolkit’). Finally, we will recap key messages identified from the workshops that underpin the animation and other dissemination plans.
Conclusion/ImplicationsOur existing understanding of public views (e.g. from consumer panels) may not represent well perspectives from population groups, such as teenage parents. Working with young families who may otherwise rarely engage in such work provides their unique perspectives, adding richness to our understanding of public views on routine data usage.
Collapse
|
32
|
Lugg-Widger F, Cannings-John R, Angel L, Moody G, Segrott J, Kenkre J, Robling M. Assessing the impact of specialist home visiting upon maltreatment in England: a feasibility study of data linkage from a public health trial to routine health and social care data. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:98. [PMID: 29988307 PMCID: PMC6022436 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0294-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up for public health trials may benefit from greater use of routine data. Our trial of a home-visiting intervention for first-time teenage mothers assessed outcomes to the child's second birthday. To examine its medium-term impact, particularly upon maltreatment outcomes, we designed a study using routine records. METHODS We aimed to establish the feasibility of our study design, which combines trial data with routine health, social care and education data using a dissent-based linkage model. Trial participant identifiers were linked to routine health, social care and education data if women did not dissent. Data were forwarded to a safe haven and further linked to de-identified trial outcome data. The feasibility study aimed first to establish the acceptability of data linkage through a discussion group of young mothers and by levels of dissent received by the research team. Second, we assessed levels of accurate linkage to both health (via NHS Digital) and education and social care (both via National Pupil Database, NPD). Third, we assessed the availability of data and levels of missingness for key outcomes received for a sample of target study years. RESULTS Of 1545 mother-child dyads contacted, eight women opted out. The engagement exercise with stakeholders found support for the principle of data linkage, including in the context of maltreatment. Some contributors preferred opt-in consent. Most (99.9%) health records were matched on either three or all four identifiers. Fifty participants were not matched to any health data. Primary outcome data from NPD are derived from any one of three fields, all of which were satisfactorily returned and provided an indication of cases for analysis. Missing data for secondary outcomes varied from 0% (Child looked after status) to 70% (Anatomical Area A&E diagnosis) however when combined with other variables the levels of missingness for outcome decrease. CONCLUSIONS Through study set-up and in this pilot, we provide evidence that the main study is feasible, satisfies governance requirements and is likely to generate data of sufficient quality to address our main research questions. Observed levels of missingness or low event rates are likely to affect some secondary analysis (e.g. state transition modelling) although overall were satisfactory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Lugg-Widger
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Rebecca Cannings-John
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Lianna Angel
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Gwenllian Moody
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Jeremy Segrott
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
- DECIPHer Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Joyce Kenkre
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| | - Michael Robling
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
- DECIPHer Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|