2
|
Rodger G, Chau K, Aranega-Bou P, Roohi A, Moore G, Hopkins KL, Hopkins S, Walker AS, Stoesser N. A workflow for the detection of antibiotic residues, measurement of water chemistry and preservation of hospital sink drain samples for metagenomic sequencing. J Hosp Infect 2024; 144:128-136. [PMID: 38145816 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital sinks are environmental reservoirs that harbour healthcare-associated (HCA) pathogens. Selective pressures in sink environments, such as antibiotic residues, nutrient waste and hardness ions, may promote antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) exchange between bacteria. However, cheap and accurate sampling methods to characterize these factors are lacking. AIMS To validate a workflow to detect antibiotic residues and evaluate water chemistry using dipsticks. Secondarily, to validate boric acid to preserve the taxonomic and ARG ('resistome') composition of sink trap samples for metagenomic sequencing. METHODS Antibiotic residue dipsticks were validated against serial dilutions of ampicillin, doxycycline, sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin, and water chemistry dipsticks against serial dilutions of chemical calibration standards. Sink trap aspirates were used for a 'real-world' pilot evaluation of dipsticks. To assess boric acid as a preservative of microbial diversity, the impact of incubation with and without boric acid at ∼22 °C on metagenomic sequencing outputs was evaluated at Day 2 and Day 5 compared with baseline (Day 0). FINDINGS The limits of detection for each antibiotic were: 3 μg/L (ampicillin), 10 μg/L (doxycycline), 20 μg/L (sulfamethoxazole) and 8 μg/L (ciprofloxacin). The best performing water chemistry dipstick correctly characterized 34/40 (85%) standards in a concentration-dependent manner. One trap sample tested positive for the presence of tetracyclines and sulphonamides. Taxonomic and resistome composition were largely maintained after storage with boric acid at ∼22 °C for up to five days. CONCLUSIONS Dipsticks can be used to detect antibiotic residues and characterize water chemistry in sink trap samples. Boric acid was an effective preservative of trap sample composition, representing a low-cost alternative to cold-chain transport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Rodger
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Health Protection Unit in Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infection, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - K Chau
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Health Protection Unit in Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infection, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - P Aranega-Bou
- Biosafety, Air and Water Microbiology Group, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, UK
| | - A Roohi
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Health Protection Unit in Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infection, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - G Moore
- Biosafety, Air and Water Microbiology Group, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, UK
| | | | - S Hopkins
- UK Health Security Agency, Colindale, UK
| | - A S Walker
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Health Protection Unit in Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infection, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - N Stoesser
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Health Protection Unit in Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-associated Infection, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marks DJB, Hyams C, Koo CY, Pavlou M, Robbins J, Koo CS, Rodger G, Huggett JF, Yap J, Macrae MB, Swanton RH, Zumla AI, Miller RF. Clinical features, microbiology and surgical outcomes of infective endocarditis: a 13-year study from a UK tertiary cardiothoracic referral centre. QJM 2015; 108:219-29. [PMID: 25223570 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcu188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infective endocarditis (IE) causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Patient and pathogen profiles, as well as microbiological and operative strategies, continue to evolve. The impact of these changes requires evaluation to inform optimum management and identify individuals at high risk of early mortality. AIM Identification of clinical and microbiological features, and surgical outcomes, among patients presenting to a UK tertiary cardiothoracic centre for surgical management of IE between 1998 and 2010. DESIGN Retrospective observational cohort study. METHODS Clinical, biochemical, microbiological and echocardiographic data were identified from clinical records. Principal outcomes were all-cause 28-day mortality and duration of post-operative admission. RESULTS Patients (n = 336) were predominantly male (75.0%); median age 52 years (IQR = 41-67). Most cases involved the aortic (56.0%) or mitral (53.9%) valves. Microbiological diagnoses, obtained in 288 (85.7%) patients, included streptococci (45.2%); staphylococci (34.5%); Haemophilus, Actinobacillus, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, Kingella (HACEK) organisms (3.0%); and fungi (1.8%); 11.3% had polymicrobial infection. Valve replacement in 308 (91.7%) patients included mechanical prostheses (69.8%), xenografts (24.0%) and homografts (6.2%). Early mortality was 12.2%, but fell progressively during the study (P = 0.02), as did median duration of post-operative admission (33.5 to 10.5 days; P = 0.0003). Multivariable analysis showed previous cardiothoracic surgery (OR = 3.85, P = 0.03), neutrophil count (OR = 2.27, P = 0.05), albumin (OR = 0.94, P = 0.04) and urea (OR = 2.63, P < 0.001) predicted early mortality. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates reduced post-operative early mortality and duration of hospital admission for IE patients over the past 13 years. Biomarkers (previous cardiothoracic surgery, neutrophil count, albumin and urea), predictive of early post-operative mortality, require prospective evaluation to refine algorithms, further improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs associated with IE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J B Marks
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Hyams
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Y Koo
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Pavlou
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Robbins
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - C S Koo
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - G Rodger
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J F Huggett
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Yap
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - M B Macrae
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - R H Swanton
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - A I Zumla
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - R F Miller
- From the Department of Medicine, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Hospital, London, UK, Department of Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, Department of Cardiology, The Heart Hospital, London, UK and National Institute of Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|