1
|
Pennings G. The forgotten group of donor conceived persons. Hum Reprod Open 2022; 2022:hoac028. [PMID: 35854828 PMCID: PMC9282352 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
A forgotten group of donor-conceived persons is those who believe that gamete donation is morally wrong and should be prohibited. Although they share the two main arguments with the anti-anonymity group, i.e. the psychological harm as a consequence of lacking the necessary information for identity construction, and the violation of a fundamental human right, namely the right to be cared for by one’s genetic parents, their voices are largely ignored in the debate. The anti-donation group also has a large part of the ideology of the family in common with the anti-anonymity group. The paper concludes that the anti-donation position should be accepted as an equivalent position. Moreover, given the similarities between the two positions, people who accept the claims of the anti-anonymity donor-conceived persons should explain why the claims of the anti-donation group should not be honoured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pacey A, Pennings G, Herrmann J, Mocanu E, Pinborg A, Burke C, Skytte A. O-187 An analysis of the outcome of 11,712 men applying to be sperm donors at Cryos International in Denmark and the USA. Hum Reprod 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac105.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Is the outcome of donor recruitment influenced by the country in which recruitment took place or the initial ID-release choice of applicants?
Summary answer
More applicants are accepted as donors in Denmark than the USA and those who choose ID release are more frequently accepted than those who don’t.
What is known already
The successful recruitment of sperm donors is essential to provide a range of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) which rely upon donor sperm. However, while much has been written about the medical screening and assessment of sperm donors from a safety perspective, relatively little has been written about the process of recruiting donors and how it works in practice. There are differences in attitudes between donors who choose to allow their identity to be released to any donor conceived people (ID-release) compared to those who don’t (non ID-release). Therefore, we reasoned this may also influence the likelihood of them being recruited.
Study design, size, duration
A total of 11,712 men applied to be sperm donors at Cryos International in Denmark and the USA during 2018 and 2019.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Anonymised records of all donor applicants were examined to assess the number passing through (or lost) at each stage of the recruitment process. Statistical analysis was carried out by Chi Squared test, using Graphpad Prism (San Diego, USA) to examine differences between location (Denmark or USA) and/or donor type (ID-release vs non-ID release).
Main results and the role of chance
Few applicants (3.79%) were accepted as donors and had samples released for use. This was higher in Denmark (6.53%) than the USA (1.03%) (χ2 = 243.2; 1df; z = 15.60; p < 0.0001) and was higher in donors who opted at the outset to be ID-release (4.70%) compared to those who didn’t (3.15%) (χ2 = 18.51; 1df; z = 4.303; p < 0.0001). Most potential donors were lost during recruitment because they: (i) withdrew, failed to respond, did not attend an appointment, or return a questionnaire (54.91%); (ii) reported a disqualifying health issue or failed a screening test (17.41%); (iii) did not meet the eligibility criteria at the outset (11.71%); or (iv) had semen quality which was not adequate (11.20%). In each case, there were statistically significant differences between countries and the donor’s initial ID choice. During recruitment, some donors decided to change ID-type. There were no country differences in the frequency in which this occurred (χ2 = 0.2852; 1df; z = 0.5340; p = 0.5933), but it was more common for donors to change from non-ID release to ID release (27.19%) than the other way around (11.45%) (χ2 = 17.75; 1df; z = 4.213; p < 0.0001) although movements in both directions did occur in both countries.
Limitations, reasons for caution
No information was available about the demographic characteristics of the applicants which may also have influenced their chances of being accepted as a donor (e.g., ethnicity, age etc). Donor recruitment procedures may differ in other locations according to local laws or guidelines.
Wider implications of the findings
A better understanding of when and why potential donors are lost in the recruitment process may help develop leaner and efficient pathways for interested donors and sperm banks. This could ultimately increase the number of donors recruited through enhanced information, support and reassurance during the recruitment process.
Trial registration number
not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Pacey
- University of Sheffield, Oncology and Metabolism , Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent BIG, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science , Gent, Belgium
| | - J Herrmann
- Centre for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law, Faculty of Law , Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Mocanu
- Rotunda Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland , Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic , Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - C Burke
- Cryos International, Sperm and Egg Bank , Orlando, U.S.A
| | - A.B Skytte
- Cryos International, Sperm and Egg Bank , Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jacxsens L, Coveney C, Culley L, Herbrand C, Lafuente-Funes S, Pavone V, Pennings G, Weis C, Hudson N, Provoost V. O-097 The presentation of medical risks and incentives in egg donation: an analysis of Belgian, Spanish and UK fertility clinic websites. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab125.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
How do fertility clinics’ websites of the UK, Belgium and Spain present the medical risks of egg donation and incentives?
Summary answer
Spanish and UK websites typically included more incentives to recruit egg donors compared to the Belgian websites. OHSS was overall the most discussed risk.
What is known already
People commonly turn to the internet for initial information. Primary presentations of information of a subject co-determine how an individual interprets the topic and thus influence later decisions. Considering the growing demand and clinics’ dependency on egg donors, some scholars have expressed concerns that clinics might (initially) misrepresent risks to recruit more egg donors. Offering appealing incentives may also encourage potential donors to dismiss possible risks and side-effects.
Therefore, it is important to see how incentives (both monetary and non-monetary rewards) and risks are presented on the websites of fertility clinics, the first source of information for egg donors.
Study design, size, duration
This study is part of the EDNA-project, a multi-phased comparative study (2017-2021), that aims to explore the social, political, economic and moral configuration of egg donation in the United Kingdom, Belgium and Spain. In this study, we only focused on the medical risks of egg donation and incentives presented on the fertility clinics’ websites of the three countries.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
We analysed the websites of all Belgian fertility clinics (n = 18), and a maximum variation sample in the UK (n = 21) and Spain (n = 23). The sampling was based on the geographical location of the clinic, size/number of cycles performed each year, the clinic’s status (independent or part of a larger clinical group) and whether the clinic was public or privately funded in the UK. Frame analysis and content analysis were used for analysis in Nvivo12.
Main results and the role of chance
No misrepresentation of risks was found. There was an extensive variety in the representation of risks. There were differences between the websites of the three countries (e.g. the risks of having acne was only discussed on Spanish websites), but also remarkable differences within the websites of a particular country (of the 40 risks, 13 were one-off mentions, each found on a single website). A description of a risk was generally accompanied by a minimization or normalization of the risk, or a statement about the fertility clinic’s excellent care for their egg donors. These three approaches were often combined.
Our analysis differentiated between incentives (i.e. external rewards) and emotional appeals. An appeal to emotions (e.g. empathy) can also motivate behavioural action (e.g. donation) but was not considered as an incentive since there is no external reward.
While Belgian websites used almost no incentives, Spanish and UK websites used gratitude and a rewarding experience as incentives. However, only Spanish websites used free medical tests as incentives, while UK websites were the only ones that used discounts received with egg sharing as an incentive. All countries’ websites used emotional appeals by enticing feelings of empathy for the recipients.
Limitations, reasons for caution
Not all UK and Spanish fertility clinics’ websites were analysed. However, our international team of researchers applied a maximum variation sampling strategy. This generated samples of clinics per country that were as diversified as possible.
Wider implications of the findings
The study shows that incentives are more often used on the UK and Spanish websites than on the Belgian websites. All three countries’ websites used emotional appeals. It should be studied how effective these incentives and emotional appeals are, and if there is a correlation with the potential donors’ risk-perceptions.
Trial registration number
not applicable
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Jacxsens
- UGent, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - C Coveney
- Loughborough University, Social and Policy Studies- School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - L Culley
- De Montfort University, Centre for Reproduction Research, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - C Herbrand
- De Montfort University, Centre for Reproduction Research, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - S Lafuente-Funes
- Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Institut für Soziologie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - V Pavone
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Institute of Public Goods and Policies, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Pennings
- UGent, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - C Weis
- De Montfort University, Centre for Reproduction Research, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - N Hudson
- De Montfort University, Centre for Reproduction Research, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - V Provoost
- UGent, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Skytte AB, Pacey A, Rothma. Herrmann J, Mocanu E, Burke C, Pennings G. P–537 What is the attitude of gamete donors towards expanded genetic testing. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
What is the opinion of gamete donors on extended carrier screening in Denmark and in US?
Summary answer
This study showed that the overwhelming majority of the donors were very positive towards genetic testing in general and the expanded carrier screening.
What is known already
There is a lack of empirical studies on the experiences of and attitudes of donors towards expanded carrier screening (ECS) (Amor et al. 2018). Oocyte donors in a Spanish clinic were surprised by the information on testing and the possibility of being carriers (Abuli et al., 2016). After adequate genetic counselling before and after the test, the results of testing did not seem to have a meaningful emotional or psychological impact on the donors.
Study design, size, duration
A questionnaire was emailed to all active sperm donors in a sperm bank in Denmark and in a sperm bank in US.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
A total of 393 donors received the email of which 233 donors completed the questionnaire, 196 in Denmark (response rate of 60.7%) and 37 in the United States (response rate of 52.9%).
Main results and the role of chance
We systematically compared the US and DK donors and ID-release versus non-ID-release donors for all characteristics and items. ID-release donors with a partner significantly more informed their partner about their donor status than non-ID-release donors (90.5% vs. 72.4%, p 0.027). ID-release donors significantly more intended to tell their own children (57.5% vs. 21.2%, p 0.001). ID-release donors significantly more thought about their potential donor children (56.2% vs. 35.0%; p 0.002) and significantly more likely to want information on whether a pregnancy occurred from their donation (70.6% vs. 55.0%, p 0.017). In addition, they also significantly more wished to obtain information about the children conceived with their sperm: the number of children (64.0% vs. 50.0%, p 0.048), their gender (40% vs. 26.2%, p 0.042), and their health (59.3% vs. 42.5%, p 0.018). The ID-release donors were much less likely than the other type not to want any information (19.3% vs. 32.5%, p 0.034). This general attitude is extended to the wish to be informed if a child with a hereditary disease is born after using their sperm. The ID-release donors were more likely to desire contact if their genetic child was diagnosed with a genetic disease (73.9% vs. 55.0%, p 0.003).
Limitations, reasons for caution
The main element that makes the study unique (i.e., the choice between ID-release and non-ID-release) also renders the generalization of the findings more difficult. Wider implications of the findings: A better understanding of the attitude among gamete doners will possibly guide future legislation and ensure the safety and welfare of the donors too.
Trial registration number
none
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A B Skytte
- Cryos International, Scientific, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - A Pacey
- The University of Sheffield, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - E Mocanu
- Rotunda Hospital, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Burke
- Cryos International, Cryos usa, Orlando, USA
| | - G Pennings
- Cryos International, Cryos usa, Orlando, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gnanenthiran S, Pennings G, Reddel C, Campbell H, Kochx M, Hamilton J, Chen V, Kritharides L. Identification of A Distinct Platelet Phenotype in the Elderly: ADP Hypersensitivity Co-exists With Platelet Protease-Activated-receptor (PAR)-1 and PAR-4 Mediated Thrombin Resistance. Heart Lung Circ 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.06.293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
6
|
Goossens E, Jahnukainen K, Mitchell RT, van Pelt A, Pennings G, Rives N, Poels J, Wyns C, Lane S, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Rives A, Valli-Pulaski H, Steimer S, Kliesch S, Braye A, Andres MM, Medrano J, Ramos L, Kristensen SG, Andersen CY, Bjarnason R, Orwig KE, Neuhaus N, Stukenborg JB. Fertility preservation in boys: recent developments and new insights †. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoaa016. [PMID: 32529047 PMCID: PMC7275639 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infertility is an important side effect of treatments used for cancer and other non-malignant conditions in males. This may be due to the loss of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) and/or altered functionality of testicular somatic cells (e.g. Sertoli cells, Leydig cells). Whereas sperm cryopreservation is the first-line procedure to preserve fertility in post-pubertal males, this option does not exist for prepubertal boys. For patients unable to produce sperm and at high risk of losing their fertility, testicular tissue freezing is now proposed as an alternative experimental option to safeguard their fertility. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE With this review, we aim to provide an update on clinical practices and experimental methods, as well as to describe patient management inclusion strategies used to preserve and restore the fertility of prepubertal boys at high risk of fertility loss. SEARCH METHODS Based on the expertise of the participating centres and a literature search of the progress in clinical practices, patient management strategies and experimental methods used to preserve and restore the fertility of prepubertal boys at high risk of fertility loss were identified. In addition, a survey was conducted amongst European and North American centres/networks that have published papers on their testicular tissue banking activity. OUTCOMES Since the first publication on murine SSC transplantation in 1994, remarkable progress has been made towards clinical application: cryopreservation protocols for testicular tissue have been developed in animal models and are now offered to patients in clinics as a still experimental procedure. Transplantation methods have been adapted for human testis, and the efficiency and safety of the technique are being evaluated in mouse and primate models. However, important practical, medical and ethical issues must be resolved before fertility restoration can be applied in the clinic.Since the previous survey conducted in 2012, the implementation of testicular tissue cryopreservation as a means to preserve the fertility of prepubertal boys has increased. Data have been collected from 24 co-ordinating centres worldwide, which are actively offering testis tissue cryobanking to safeguard the future fertility of boys. More than 1033 young patients (age range 3 months to 18 years) have already undergone testicular tissue retrieval and storage for fertility preservation. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The review does not include the data of all reproductive centres worldwide. Other centres might be offering testicular tissue cryopreservation. Therefore, the numbers might be not representative for the entire field in reproductive medicine and biology worldwide. The key ethical issue regarding fertility preservation in prepubertal boys remains the experimental nature of the intervention. WIDER IMPLICATIONS The revised procedures can be implemented by the multi-disciplinary teams offering and/or developing treatment strategies to preserve the fertility of prepubertal boys who have a high risk of fertility loss. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The work was funded by ESHRE. None of the authors has a conflict of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Goossens
- Biology of the Testis, Research Laboratory for Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Jahnukainen
- NORDFERTIL Research Lab Stockholm, Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.,Division of Haematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, New Children's Hospital, Pediatric Research Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - R T Mitchell
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh; and the Edinburgh Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Amm van Pelt
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - N Rives
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, EA 4308 "Gametogenesis and Gamete Quality", Rouen University Hospital, Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Laboratory, F 76000, Rouen, France
| | - J Poels
- Department of Gynecology and Andrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Wyns
- Department of Gynecology and Andrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Lane
- Department of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Children's Hospital Oxford, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - K A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.,Section of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Rives
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, EA 4308 "Gametogenesis and Gamete Quality", Rouen University Hospital, Biology of Reproduction-CECOS Laboratory, F 76000, Rouen, France
| | - H Valli-Pulaski
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - S Steimer
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - S Kliesch
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Institute of Reproductive and Regenerative Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - A Braye
- Biology of the Testis, Research Laboratory for Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - M M Andres
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - J Medrano
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Ramos
- Departement of Obstetrics and Gynacology, Division Reproductive Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S G Kristensen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - C Y Andersen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Bjarnason
- Children's Medical Center, Landspítali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - K E Orwig
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - N Neuhaus
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Institute of Reproductive and Regenerative Biology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - J B Stukenborg
- NORDFERTIL Research Lab Stockholm, Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pennings G. Reply: Ethics of anonymity in gamete donation and genetic databases. Hum Reprod 2019; 34:1850-1851. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G Pennings
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Blandinberg 2, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mishra S, Kacin E, Stamatiadis P, Franck S, Van der Jeught M, Mertes H, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Sermon K, Heindryckx B, Geens M. The role of the reprogramming method and pluripotency state in gamete differentiation from patient-specific human pluripotent stem cells. Mol Hum Reprod 2019; 24:173-184. [PMID: 29471503 DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gay007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The derivation of gametes from patient-specific pluripotent stem cells may provide new perspectives for genetic parenthood for patients currently facing sterility. We use current data to assess the gamete differentiation potential of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells and to determine which reprogramming strategy holds the greatest promise for future clinical applications. First, we compare the two best established somatic cell reprogramming strategies: the production of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) and somatic cell nuclear transfer followed by embryonic stem cell derivation (SCNT-ESC). Recent reports have indicated that these stem cells, though displaying a similar pluripotency potential, show important differences at the epigenomic level, which may have repercussions on their applicability. By comparing data on the genetic and epigenetic stability of these cell types during derivation and in-vitro culture, we assess the reprogramming efficiency of both technologies and possible effects on the subsequent differentiation potential of these cells. Moreover, we discuss possible implications of mitochondrial heteroplasmy. We also address the ethical aspects of both cell types, as well as the safety considerations associated with clinical applications using these cells, e.g. the known genomic instability of human PSCs during long-term culture. Secondly, we discuss the role of the stem cell pluripotency state in germ cell differentiation. In mice, success in germ cell development from pluripotent stem cells could only be achieved when starting from a naive state of pluripotency. It remains to be investigated if the naive state is also crucial for germ cell differentiation in human cells and to what extent human naive pluripotency resembles the naive state in mouse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mishra
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team, Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - E Kacin
- Research Group, Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Jette, Brussels, Belgium
| | - P Stamatiadis
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team, Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - S Franck
- Research Group, Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Jette, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Van der Jeught
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team, Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - H Mertes
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - P De Sutter
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team, Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Sermon
- Research Group, Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Jette, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Heindryckx
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team, Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Geens
- Research Group, Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Jette, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Harper JC, Aittomäki K, Borry P, Cornel MC, de Wert G, Dondorp W, Geraedts J, Gianaroli L, Ketterson K, Liebaers I, Lundin K, Mertes H, Morris M, Pennings G, Sermon K, Spits C, Soini S, van Montfoort APA, Veiga A, Vermeesch JR, Viville S, Macek M. Recent developments in genetics and medically assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:12-33. [PMID: 29199274 PMCID: PMC5839000 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0016-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Two leading European professional societies, the European Society of Human Genetics and the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, have worked together since 2004 to evaluate the impact of fast research advances at the interface of assisted reproduction and genetics, including their application into clinical practice. In September 2016, the expert panel met for the third time. The topics discussed highlighted important issues covering the impacts of expanded carrier screening, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, voiding of the presumed anonymity of gamete donors by advanced genetic testing, advances in the research of genetic causes underlying male and female infertility, utilisation of massively parallel sequencing in preimplantation genetic testing and non-invasive prenatal screening, mitochondrial replacement in human oocytes, and additionally, issues related to cross-generational epigenetic inheritance following IVF and germline genome editing. The resulting paper represents a consensus of both professional societies involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Harper
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - K Aittomäki
- Laboratory of Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - P Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J Geraedts
- Department Genetics and Cell Biology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L Gianaroli
- S.I.S.Me.R. Reproductive Medicine Unit, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - I Liebaers
- Center for Medical Genetics, UZ Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Lundin
- Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - H Mertes
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Morris
- Synlab Genetics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Sermon
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Spits
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Soini
- Helsinki Biobank, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A P A van Montfoort
- IVF Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Veiga
- Barcelona Stem Cell Bank, Centre of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
- Reproductive Medicine Service of Dexeus Woman Health, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J R Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Viville
- Institute of Parasitology and Pathology, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Laboratory of Genetic Diagnostics, UF3472-Genetics of Infertility, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
| | - M Macek
- Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Charles University-2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Harper JC, Aittomäki K, Borry P, Cornel MC, de Wert G, Dondorp W, Geraedts J, Gianaroli L, Ketterson K, Liebaers I, Lundin K, Mertes H, Morris M, Pennings G, Sermon K, Spits C, Soini S, van Montfoort APA, Veiga A, Vermeesch JR, Viville S, Macek M. Recent developments in genetics and medically-assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications †‡. Hum Reprod Open 2017; 2017:hox015. [PMID: 31486804 PMCID: PMC6276693 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hox015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Two leading European professional societies, the European Society of Human Genetics and the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, have worked together since 2004 to evaluate the impact of fast research advances at the interface of assisted reproduction and genetics, including their application into clinical practice. In September 2016, the expert panel met for the third time. The topics discussed highlighted important issues covering the impacts of expanded carrier screening, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, voiding of the presumed anonymity of gamete donors by advanced genetic testing, advances in the research of genetic causes underlying male and female infertility, utilisation of massively-parallel sequencing in preimplantation genetic testing and non-invasive prenatal screening, mitochondrial replacement in human oocytes, and additionally, issues related to cross-generational epigenetic inheritance following IVF and germline genome editing. The resulting paper represents a consensus of both professional societies involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Harper
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 86-96 Chenies Mews, London WC1E 6HX, UK
| | - K Aittomäki
- Laboratory of Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 720, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - P Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 - Box 7001. B-3000, Leuven Belgium
| | - M C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G de Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, De Byeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, De Byeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J Geraedts
- Department Genetics and Cell Biology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L Gianaroli
- S.I.S.Me.R. Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - K Ketterson
- Althea Science, Inc., 3 Regent St #301, Livingston, NJ 07039, USA
| | - I Liebaers
- Centre for Medical Genetics, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Lundin
- Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå Stråket 6, 413 45, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - H Mertes
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - M Morris
- Synlab Genetics, chemin d'Entre-Bois 21, CH-1018, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - K Sermon
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Spits
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Soini
- Helsinki Biobank, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 3, PO Box 400, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | - A P A van Montfoort
- IVF laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Veiga
- Barcelona Stem Cell Bank, Centre of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Gran Via de l' Hospitalet 199, 08908, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Reproductive Medicine Service of Dexeus Woman Health, Gran Via Carles III, 71-75 - 08028 Barcelona, Spain
| | - J R Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, O&N I Herestraat 49 - Box 602, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Viville
- Institute of Parasitology and Pathology, University of Strasbourg, 3 rue Koberlé, 67000 Strasbourg, France
- Laboratory of Genetic Diagnostics, UF3472-Genetics of Infertility, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - M Macek
- Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Charles University 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, Prague CZ-15006, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Van Parys H, Provoost V, Wyverkens E, De Sutter P, Pennings G, Buysse A. Family Communication About the Donor Conception: A Multi-Perspective Qualitative Study With Lesbian Parents and Their Children. Qual Health Res 2016; 26:1998-2008. [PMID: 26386025 DOI: 10.1177/1049732315606684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
In literature, disclosure of donor conception in lesbian families has been considered an obvious and straightforward event. However, little is known about the ways in which donor conception is discussed in planned lesbian co-mother families. This study focuses on the process of parent-child communication about the donor conception on a within-family level. Six families, including 7 children and 12 parents, were interviewed about their family communication with regard to donor conception. A dyadic interview analysis revealed that family members managed the space taken up by the topic of donor conception in their daily conversations. Within these conversations, they also took care of each other and of their family relationships. In addition, children had an active position in the co-construction of the donor conception narrative. Linking these findings to the concepts of relational management and functionality of donor conception narratives, this study informs practitioners in the field of medically assisted reproduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Van Parys
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - V Provoost
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - E Wyverkens
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - P De Sutter
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - A Buysse
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vassena R, Heindryckx B, Peco R, Pennings G, Raya A, Sermon K, Veiga A. Genome engineering through CRISPR/Cas9 technology in the human germline and pluripotent stem cells. Hum Reprod Update 2016; 22:411-9. [PMID: 26932460 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the recent development of CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9 genome editing technology, the possibility to genetically manipulate the human germline (gametes and embryos) has become a distinct technical possibility. Although many technical challenges still need to be overcome in order to achieve adequate efficiency and precision of the technology in human embryos, the path leading to genome editing has never been simpler, more affordable, and widespread. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE In this narrative review we seek to understand the possible impact of CRISR/Cas9 technology on human reproduction from the technical and ethical point of view, and suggest a course of action for the scientific community. SEARCH METHODS This non-systematic review was carried out using Medline articles in English, as well as technical documents from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and reports in the media. The technical possibilities of the CRISPR/Cas9 technology with regard to human reproduction are analysed based on results obtained in model systems such as large animals and laboratory rodents. Further, the possibility of CRISPR/Cas9 use in the context of human reproduction, to modify embryos, germline cells, and pluripotent stem cells is reviewed based on the authors' expert opinion. Finally, the possible uses and consequences of CRISPR/cas9 gene editing in reproduction are analysed from the ethical point of view. OUTCOMES We identify critical technical and ethical issues that should deter from employing CRISPR/Cas9 based technologies in human reproduction until they are clarified. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Overcoming the numerous technical limitations currently associated with CRISPR/Cas9 mediated editing of the human germline will depend on intensive research that needs to be transparent and widely disseminated. Rather than a call to a generalized moratorium, or banning, of this type of research, efforts should be placed on establishing an open, international, collaborative and regulated research framework. Equally important, a societal discussion on the risks, benefits, and preferred applications of the new technology, including all relevant stakeholders, is urgently needed and should be promoted, and ultimately guide research priorities in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Vassena
- Clínica EUGIN, Barcelona 08029, Spain
| | - B Heindryckx
- Ghent Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - R Peco
- Center for Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona (CMRB), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - A Raya
- Center for Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona (CMRB), 08003 Barcelona, Spain Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain Center for Networked Biomedical Research on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - K Sermon
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Veiga
- Center for Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona (CMRB), 08003 Barcelona, Spain Reproductive Medicine Service, Hospital Universitari Quiron Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Picton HM, Wyns C, Anderson RA, Goossens E, Jahnukainen K, Kliesch S, Mitchell RT, Pennings G, Rives N, Tournaye H, van Pelt AMM, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Schlatt S. A European perspective on testicular tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in prepubertal and adolescent boys. Hum Reprod 2015; 30:2463-75. [PMID: 26358785 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What clinical practices, patient management strategies and experimental methods are currently being used to preserve and restore the fertility of prepubertal boys and adolescent males? SUMMARY ANSWER Based on a review of the clinical literature and research evidence for sperm freezing and testicular tissue cryopreservation, and after consideration of the relevant ethical and legal challenges, an algorithm for the cryopreservation of sperm and testicular tissue is proposed for prepubertal boys and adolescent males at high risk of fertility loss. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY A known late effect of the chemotherapy agents and radiation exposure regimes used to treat childhood cancers and other non-malignant conditions in males is the damage and/or loss of the proliferating spermatogonial stem cells in the testis. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa is the first line treatment for fertility preservation in adolescent males. Where sperm retrieval is impossible, such as in prepubertal boys, or it is unfeasible in adolescents prior to the onset of ablative therapies, alternative experimental treatments such as testicular tissue cryopreservation and the harvesting and banking of isolated spermatogonial stem cells can now be proposed as viable means of preserving fertility. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Advances in clinical treatments, patient management strategies and the research methods used to preserve sperm and testicular tissue for prepubertal boys and adolescents were reviewed. A snapshot of the up-take of testis cryopreservation as a means to preserve the fertility of young males prior to December 2012 was provided using a questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A comprehensive literature review was conducted. In addition, survey results of testis freezing practices in young patients were collated from 24 European centres and Israeli University Hospitals. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE There is increasing evidence of the use of testicular tissue cryopreservation as a means to preserve the fertility of pre- and peri-pubertal boys of up to 16 year-old. The survey results indicate that of the 14 respondents, half of the centres were actively offering testis tissue cryobanking as a means of safeguarding the future fertility of boys and adolescents as more than 260 young patients (age range less than 1 year old to 16 years of age), had already undergone testicular tissue retrieval and storage for fertility preservation. The remaining centres were considering the implementation of a tissue-based fertility preservation programme for boys undergoing oncological treatments. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The data collected were limited by the scope of the questionnaire, the geographical range of the survey area, and the small number of respondents. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The clinical and research questions identified and the ethical and legal issues raised are highly relevant to the multi-disciplinary teams developing treatment strategies to preserve the fertility of prepubertal and adolescent boys who have a high risk of fertility loss due to ablative interventions, trauma or genetic pre-disposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M Picton
- Division of Reproduction and Early Development, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Christine Wyns
- Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Pôle de Recherche en Gynécologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium Department of Gynecology-Andrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ellen Goossens
- Research Group Biology of the Testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kirsi Jahnukainen
- Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sabine Kliesch
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University Münster, Domagkstraße 11, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Rod T Mitchell
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Faculty of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Natalie Rives
- Laboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction - CECOS, Research Team EA 4308 'Gametogenesis and gamete quality', IRIB, Rouen University Hospital, University of Rouen, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France
| | - Herman Tournaye
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of the Brussels Free University, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ans M M van Pelt
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
- Faculty of Biology, Gene Technology/Microbiology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld 33501, Germany
| | - Stefan Schlatt
- Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University Münster, Domagkstraße 11, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pennings G. Editorial. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2015; 7:79-80. [PMID: 26175885 PMCID: PMC4498172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G. Pennings
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chow V, Yeoh T, Reddel C, Pennings G, Scott E, Curnow J, Ng A, Kritharides L. Cardiomyopathy, hypercoagulability and inflammation in patients with schizophrenia. Heart Lung Circ 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.06.174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
16
|
Raes I, Van Parys H, Provoost V, Buysse A, De Sutter P, Pennings G. Two mothers and a donor: exploration of children's family concepts in lesbian households. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2015; 7:83-90. [PMID: 26175886 PMCID: PMC4498173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although children from lesbian families appear to make a distinction between a residential father and a donor, defining these two concepts seems to be a challenge. They need to appeal to more familiar concepts such as the hetero-normative concept of 'mother' to give a definition of the unfamiliar concepts they are confronted with. METHODS The study is based on qualitative in-depth interviews with 6 children (9-10 years old) from lesbian families, all of which have been conceived using anonymous sperm donation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. RESULTS Two findings stand out. First, in defining the concepts of biological and non-biological mother, both mothers were described as equal parents. No difference was attached by the children to the mothers' position as a parent. Second, the concepts 'non-biological mother' and 'donor' were defined by looking at the hetero-normative concepts of 'mummy' and 'daddy'. To define the non-biological mother, both a 'mummy' and a 'daddy' were used as a reference. To define the donor concept, often references were made to a daddy. This comparison with a 'daddy' turned out to be complex due to the conflict between the role as a progenitor and the lack of a social relationship. The lack of language surrounding this concept turned out to be difficult. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study illustrates the complexity and ambiguity of children's experiences and perceptions when dealing with issues related to genetic and social parenthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. Raes
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - H. Van Parys
- Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - V. Provoost
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - A. Buysse
- Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - P. De Sutter
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - G. Pennings
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ravelingien A, Provoost V, Wyverkens E, Buysse A, De Sutter P, Pennings G. Lesbian couples' views about and experiences of not being able to choose their sperm donor. Cult Health Sex 2014; 17:592-606. [PMID: 25421906 DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2014.979883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
In this qualitative study, we explore how lesbian recipients view and experience the selection of their anonymous sperm donor. The study was conducted in Belgium, where fertility centres follow a legal protocol that severely restricts personal choice in donor selection. While previous studies have shown that recipients want greater control and input in the selection of their sperm donor, this was not a main concern for most women in the present study. They generally acknowledged their lack of control on the selection outcome and accepted this as part and parcel of an anonymous donation policy that provides an opportunity to have a child. They actively and passively downplayed initial concerns about the donor selection procedure and felt they did not have or need a right to further control over the donor selection. In adopting this 'subordinate' position, they felt they should trust the hospital, which they hoped would fulfil rather high screening standards. Those who did want more choice were nuanced and careful about their motivations: they focused on selecting traits that would facilitate normal child development or increase family coherence. The findings shed light on how these patients perceive their position in this third-party reproduction setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ravelingien
- a Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
De Wert G, Dondorp W, Shenfield F, Barri P, Devroey P, Diedrich K, Tarlatzis B, Provoost V, Pennings G. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 23: medically assisted reproduction in singles, lesbian and gay couples, and transsexual people†. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1859-65. [PMID: 25052011 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This Task Force document discusses ethical issues arising with requests for medically assisted reproduction from people in what may be called 'non-standard' situations and relationships. The document stresses that categorically denying access to any of these groups cannot be reconciled with a human rights perspective. If there are concerns about the implications of assisted reproduction on the wellbeing of any of the persons involved, including the future child, a surrogate mother or the applicants themselves, these concerns have to be considered in the light of the available scientific evidence. When doing so it is important to avoid the use of double standards. More research is needed into the psychosocial implications of raising children in non-standard situations, especially with regard to single women, male homosexual couples and transsexual people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G De Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Institutes CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, MD 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Institutes CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, MD 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - F Shenfield
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Obstetric Hospital, University College Hospital, Huntley Street, London WC1 6AU, UK
| | - P Barri
- Servei de Medicina de la Reproducció, Departament d'Obstetricia, Universitari Dexeus, Ginecologia i Reproducció, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Devroey
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Diedrich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Luebeck, Germany
| | - B Tarlatzis
- Infertility and IVF Center, Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - V Provoost
- Department of Philosophy, University of Ghent, Blandijnberg 2, Gent 9000, Belgium
| | - G Pennings
- Department of Philosophy, University of Ghent, Blandijnberg 2, Gent 9000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bonte P, Sterckx S, Pennings G. May the Blessed Man Win: A Critique of the Categorical Preference for Natural Talent over Doping as Proper Origins of Athletic Ability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2014; 39:368-86. [DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhu024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
20
|
De Wert G, Dondorp W, Shenfield F, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B, Barri P, Diedrich K, Provoost V, Pennings G. ESHRE task force on ethics and Law22: preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1610-7. [PMID: 24927929 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This Task Force document discusses some relatively unexplored ethical issues involved in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). The document starts from the wide consensus that PGD is ethically acceptable if aimed at helping at-risk couples to avoid having a child with a serious disorder. However, if understood as a limit to acceptable indications for PGD, this 'medical model' may turn out too restrictive. The document discusses a range of possible requests for PGD that for different reasons fall outwith the accepted model and argues that instead of rejecting those requests out of hand, they need to be independently assessed in the light of ethical criteria. Whereas, for instance, there is no good reason for rejecting PGD in order to avoid health problems in a third generation (where the second generation would be healthy but faced with burdensome reproductive choices if wanting to have children), using PGD to make sure that one's child will have the same disorder or handicap as its parents, is ethically unacceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G De Wert
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Institutes CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - W Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Institutes CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - F Shenfield
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Obstetric Hospital, 2nd Floor, University College Hospital Huntley Street, London WC1 6AU, UK
| | - P Devroey
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Tarlatzis
- Infertility and IVF Center, Department of OB/GYN Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - P Barri
- Servei de Medicina de la Reproducció, Departament d'Obstetricia, Universitari Dexeus, Ginecologia i Reproducció, Barcelona, Spain
| | - K Diedrich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Luebeck, Germany
| | - V Provoost
- Department of Philosophy, University of Ghent, Blandijnberg 2, Gent 9000, Belgium
| | - G Pennings
- Department of Philosophy, University of Ghent, Blandijnberg 2, Gent 9000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dondorp W, De Wert G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B, Barri P, Diedrich K, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Tuttelmann F, Provoost V. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 21: genetic screening of gamete donors: ethical issues. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1353-9. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
|
22
|
Wyverkens E, Provoost V, Ravelingien A, De Sutter P, Pennings G, Buysse A. Beyond sperm cells: a qualitative study on constructed meanings of the sperm donor in lesbian families. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1248-54. [PMID: 24676402 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What meanings do lesbian couples construct regarding their sperm donor? SUMMARY ANSWER For some parents, the donor was increasingly presented as a person, whereas for other parents, the donor was seen as an instrument from the moment they received the sperm donation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Few studies specifically focus on how lesbian couples deal with the issue of third-party anonymous gamete donation. It is often assumed that they have fewer difficulties than heterosexual couples with the involvement of a male procreator, since their status as a donor conception family is 'socially visible' and there is no social father who fears exclusion. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 lesbian couples (20 participants), recruited via the Ghent University Hospital. All couples had at least one child, conceived through anonymous donor insemination, between 7 and 10 years old. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Within the data corpus, a particular data set was analyzed where couples referred to their donor and his position in their family. Step-by-step inductive thematic analysis was performed resulting in themes that are grounded in the data. All phases of the analysis were followed by team discussion. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE This study reveals different donor constructs, indicating different ways of dealing with the third-party involvement in the family. Some parents diminish the role of the donor throughout family life and continue to present him as an instrument: something they needed in order to become parents. Others show an increasing interest in the donor as the children mature, which results in a more personalized account of the donor. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION In our qualitative cross-sectional study, we collected retrospectively constructed stories. Longitudinal qualitative and quantitative research is required to allow for an extrapolation of the conclusions made. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study shows how the concept of the donor is constructed within lesbian families and how it is challenged by the child's developing personality and features. When counseling prospective parents, it could therefore be useful to discuss the concept of the anonymous donor beyond the conception phase. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The project was funded by the Research Fund of Ghent University, Belgium. There are no competing interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Wyverkens
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pennings G, de Mouzon J, Shenfield F, Ferraretti AP, Mardesic T, Ruiz A, Goossens V. Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1076-89. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
24
|
Van Hoof W, De Sutter P, Pennings G. "Now we feel like we did everything we could": A qualitative study into the experiences of Dutch patients who travelled to Belgium for infertility treatment. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2014; 6:185-93. [PMID: 25593693 PMCID: PMC4286857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Many Dutch infertility patients go to Belgium for treatment every year. This is the first qualitative interview study looking into the experiences and perspectives of Dutch patients who travel to Belgium for infertility treatment. We recruited 16 heterosexual couples and one single woman to ensure maximal diversity in age, distance to the clinic, type of treatment and number of previously failed cycles. The interview data was analysed using inductive thematic analysis. The central theme in the data was that going to Belgium was the next step. The Dutch patients believed that the quality of care was very high in Belgium and that in taking this step, they did everything they could to achieve a pregnancy.
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Traeger-Synodinos J, Coonen E, Goossens V, De Mouzon J, Shenfield F, Ruiz A, Goossens V, Ferraretti AP, Mardesic T, Pennings G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, de Mouzon J, Ruiz A, Ferraretti AP, Mardesic T, Goossens V. Session 09: ESHRE data reporting on PGD cycles and oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
27
|
Somers S, Provoost V, Van Parys H, Ravelingien A, Wyverkens E, Raes I, Stuyver I, Buysse A, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Bergman L, Pe'er G, Carmeli D, Dirnfeld M, Eelen K, Verschueren S, Van den Broeck U, Bakelants E, Repping S, Dancet E, D'Hooghe T, De Vries T, Michon SM, D'Hooghe TM, Van der Veen F, Repping S, Dancet EAF, Hershberger PE, Finnegan L, Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Mounce G, Birks J, Bradley C, Child T. Paramedical - nursing. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Dunselman G, Vermeulen N, Nelen W, Provoost V, Tilleman K, D'Angelo A, De Sutter P, De Wert G, Dondorp W, Nelen W, Pennings G, Shenfield F. Session 56: From experimental to established: ESHRE guidelines and position papers. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
29
|
Van Parys H, Wyverkens E, Provoost V, Ravelingien A, Raes I, Somers S, Stuyver I, De Sutter P, Pennings G, Buysse A, Anttila VS, Salevaara M, Suikkari AM, Listijono DR, Mooney S, Chapman MG, Res Muravec U, Pusica S, Lomsek M, Cizek Sajko M, Parames S, Semiao-Francisco L, Sato H, Ueno J, van den Wijngaard L, Mochtar MH, van Dam H, van der Veen F, van Wely M, Derks-Smeets IAP, Habets JJG, Tibben A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Geraedts JPM, van Golde R, Gomez-Garcia E, de Die-Smulders CEM, van Osch LADM, Habets JJG, Derks-Smeets IAP, Tibben A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Geraedts JPM, van Golde R, Gomez-Garcia E, Kets CM, de Die-Smulders CEM, van Osch LADM, Gullo S, Donarelli Z, Coco GL, Marino A, Volpes A, Sammartano F, Allegra A, Nekkebroeck J, Tournaye H, Stoop D, Donarelli Z, Lo Coco G, Gullo S, Marino A, Volpes A, Coffaro F, Allegra A, Diaz DG, Gonzalez MA, Tirado M, Chamorro S, Dolz P, Gil MA, Ballesteros A, Velilla E, Castello C, Moina N, Lopez-Teijon M, Chan CHY, Chan CLW, Leong MKH, Cheung IKM, Chan THY, Hui BNL, van Dongen AJCM, Huppelschoten AG, Kremer JAM, Nelen WLDM, Verhaak CM, Sun HG, Lee KH, Park IH, Kim SG, Lee JH, Kim YY, Kim HJ, Cho JD, Yoo YJ, Frokjaer V, Pinborg A, Larsen EC, Heede M, Stenbaek DS, Henningsson S, Nielsen AP, Svarer C, Holst KK, Knudsen GM, Emery M, DeJonckheere L, Rothen S, Wisard M, Germond M, Stenbaek DS, Toftager M, Hjordt LV, Jensen PS, Holst K, Holland T, Bryndorf T, Bogstad J, Hornnes P, Frokjaer VG, Dornelles LMN, MacCallum F, Lopes RCS, Piccinini CA, Passos EP, Bruegge C, Thorn P, Daniels K, Imrie S, Jadva V, Golombok S, Arens Y, De Krom G, Van Golde RJT, Coonen E, Van Ravenswaaij-Arts CMA, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Evers JLH, Geraedts JPM, De Die-Smulders CEM, Ghazeeri G, Awwad J, Fakih A, Abbas H, Harajly S, Tawidian L, Maalouf F, Ajdukovic D, Pibernik-Okanovic M, Alebic MS, Baccino G, Calatayud C, Ricciarelli E, de Miguel ERH, Stuyver I, Wierckx K, Verstraelen H, Van Glabeke L, Van den Abbeel E, Gerris J, T'Sjoen G, De Sutter P, Monica B, Calonge RN, Peregrin PC, Cserepes R, Kollar J, Wischmann T, Bugan A, Pinkard C, Harrison C, Bunting L, Boivin J, Fulford B, Boivin J, Theusink-Kirchhoff N, van Ravenswaaij-Arts CMA, Bakker MK, Volks C, Papaligoura Z, Papadatou D, Bellali TH, Thorn P, Wischmann T, Wischmann T, Thorn P, Jarvholm S, Broberg M, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Weitzman G, Van Der Putten-Landau TM, Chudnoff S, Panagopoulou E, Tarlatzis B, Tamhankar V, Jones GL, Magill P, Skull JD, Ledger W, Hvidman HW, Specht IO, Pinborg A, Schmidt KT, Larsen EC, Andersen AN, Freeman T, Zadeh S, Smith V, Golombok S, Whitaker LHR, Reid J, Wilson J, Critchley HOD, Horne AW, Zadeh S, Freeman T, Smith V, Golombok S, Peterson B, Pirritano M, Schmidt L, Volgsten H, Wyverkens E, Van Parys H, Provoost V, Ravelingien A, Raes I, Somers S, Stuyver I, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Buysse A, Hudson N, Culley L, Law C, Denny E, Mitchell H, Baumgarten M, Raine-Fenning N, Blake L, Jadva V, Golombok S, Lee KH, Sun HG, Park IH, Kim SG, Lee JH, Kim YY, Kim HJ, Kim KH. Psychology and counselling. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
30
|
Svitnev K, Provoost V, Wyverkens E, Van Parys H, Ravelingien A, Raes I, Somers S, Stuyver I, De Sutter P, Buysse A, Pennings G, Dondorp W, De Wert G, Cutas D, Dondorp W, De Wert G, Hens K, Dondorp WJ, de Wert GM, Tack S, Balthazar T, Osmanagaoglu K, Pennings G. Ethics and law. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
31
|
Darby H, Raes I, Wyverkens E, Van Parys H, Ravelingien A, Provoost V, Somers S, Stuyver I, Buysse A, De Sutter P, Pennings G, Smajdor A, Ravelingien A, Pennings G, De Groot M, Dancet EAF, Repping S, Stoop D, Goddijn M, Van der Veen F, Gerrits T. Session 42: Ethical aspects of ART. Hum Reprod 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
32
|
Abstract
Analogical reasoning is a basic method in bioethics. Its main purpose is to transfer the rule from an existing or known situation to a new and problematic situation. This commentary applies the lifeboat analogy to the context of selective termination and fetal reduction. It turns out that the analogy is only partially helpful as the main principle in the case of selective termination is the procreative beneficence principle. However, the wide person-affecting form of this principle doubly justifies selective termination: i.e. one prevents the harm caused by the birth of an affected child and one increases the life chances of the remaining fetuses. I conclude, however, that all analogies are basically flawed since they assume that fetuses as such have interests. I argue that fetuses only have interests to the extent that they are potential future persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dondorp W, De Wert G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B, Barri P, Diedrich K. ESHRE Task Force on ethics and Law 20: sex selection for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:1448-54. [PMID: 23578946 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This Task Force document revisits the debate about the ethics of sex selection for non-medical reasons in the light of relevant new technological developments. First, as a result of improvement of the Microsort® flow cytometry method, there is now a proven technique for preconception sex selection that can be combined both with IVF and IUI. Secondly, the scenario where new approaches that are currently being developed for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) may lead to such screening becoming a routine part of all IVF treatment. In that scenario professionals will more often be confronted with parental requests for transfer of an embryo of a specific sex. Thirdly, the recent development of non-invasive prenatal testing based on cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma allows for easy and safe sex determination in the early stages of pregnancy. While stressing the new urgency that these developments give to the debate, the Task Force did not come to a unanimous position with regard to the acceptability of sex selection for non-medical reasons in the context of assisted reproduction. Whereas some think maintaining the current ban is the best approach, others are in favour of allowing sex selection for non-medical reasons under conditions that take account of societal concerns about the possible impact of the practice. By presenting these positions, the document reflects the different views about this issue that also exist in the field. Specific recommendations include the need for a wider delineation of accepted 'medical reasons' than in terms of avoiding a serious sex-linked disorder, and for a clarification of the legal position with regard to answering parental requests for 'additional sex selection' in the context of medically indicated preimplantation genetic diagnosis, or routine PGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research Institutes CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Raes I, Ravelingien A, Pennings G. The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametes. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:560-5. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|
35
|
Ravelingien A, Provoost V, Pennings G. Donor-conceived children looking for their sperm donor: what do they want to know? Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2013; 5:257-64. [PMID: 24753953 PMCID: PMC3987373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper aims to gain in-depth understanding of why some donor-conceived offspring want to know the identity of their sperm donor. METHODS Step-by-step inductive thematic analysis was performed on first-hand quotes from donor-conceived offspring selected from a wide range of sources (including empirical studies and donor conception networks, registries and support groups). RESULTS We found that at least 7 different objectives can underlie the wish to know one's donor: to avoid medical risks and consanguineous relationships; to connect with one's roots; to complete one's life (hi-)story; to understand where one's traits come from; to discover or assess one's defining characteristics and capabilities; to rectify a wrong-doing, and to map out one's ancestral history. CONCLUSION The analysis shows that there is great variance among identity-seekers in the weight they attribute to wanting to know their donor. It is also clear that they have very different assumptions about the role and importance of genetics in terms of establishing 'who they are' or 'can become', including deterministic misconceptions. Rather than treat all donor-conceived offspring's needs as of equal concern, this analysis should help distinguish between and assess the relevance of the various motivations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ravelingien
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - V Provoost
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - G Pennings
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Dondorp W, de Wert G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B, Barri P, Diedrich K. Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:1231-7. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
38
|
Edelman J, Fung L, Pennings G, Kritharides L, Bannon P, Fraser J, Vallely M. Neutrophils are Hyporesponsive After OPCAB. Heart Lung Circ 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2012.05.687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
39
|
Hamm D, Anton J, Mertes H, Pennings G, Dondorp WJ, de Wert GMWR, Svitnev K, Raes I, Ravelingien A, Pennings G, Provoost V, Pennings G. SESSION 21: ETHICS OF DONATION AND SURROGACY. Hum Reprod 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/27.s2.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
40
|
Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Van de Velde A, Dhont M. Trends in embryo disposition decisions: patients' responses to a 15-year mailing program. Hum Reprod 2011; 27:506-14. [PMID: 22171076 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examined the responses of patients of a Belgian fertility center to mailed requests to make or renew an embryo disposition decision (EDD), over a period of 15 years, to investigate trends in the decisions. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on a mailing program from 1992 to 2006, for patients, of the Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital (Belgium), from whom embryos had been cryopreserved at least 2 years. RESULTS In 15 years, 3840 EDD forms were prepared for 2334 couples or female patients. The number of forms increased from 21 in 1992 to 558 in 2006. Each year, around a third of the forms were not returned. In general, a quarter of patients who received more than one form never answered. Donation to others for reproduction was overall the least popular option and decreased over the years. The rising trend in decisions to discard reversed into a negative trend from the introduction of donation for science (1997). Since then, donation for science has been the most popular option and its popularity increased with time. In 15 years, 2504 embryos were donated for science. More than a quarter of the patients who chose more than one final EDD in different years did not select the same EDD the second time. CONCLUSIONS This study showed a positive trend in donation for science and a negative trend in donation to others and discarding. A substantial number of individual patients chose different types of EDDs in consecutive mailings, which shows that advance EDD directives should be used with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Provoost
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wierckx K, Van Caenegem E, Pennings G, Elaut E, Dedecker D, Van de Peer F, Weyers S, De Sutter P, T'Sjoen G. Reproductive wish in transsexual men. Hum Reprod 2011; 27:483-7. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 210] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
42
|
|
43
|
Shenfield F, Pennings G, De Mouzon J, Ferraretti AP, Goossens V. ESHRE's good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:1625-7. [PMID: 21505043 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper outlines ESHRE's guidance for centers and physicians providing fertility treatment to foreign patients. This guide aims to ensure high-quality and safe assisted reproduction treatment, taking into account the patients, their future child and the interests of third-party collaborators such as gametes donors and surrogates. This is achieved by including considerations of equity, safety, efficiency, effectiveness (including evidence-based care), timeliness and patient centeredness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Shenfield
- University College London Hospitals Trust, Reproductive Medicine Unit, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Pennings G. 33 The ethics of patient-friendly ART. Reprod Biomed Online 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(11)60050-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
46
|
Abstract
Recent preclinical studies have shown the feasibility of specific variants of nuclear transfer to prevent mitochondrial DNA disorders. Nuclear transfer could be a valuable reproductive option for carriers of mitochondrial mutations. A clinical application of nuclear transfer, however, would entail germ-line modification, more specifically a germ-line modification of the mitochondrial genome. One of the most prominent objections against germ-line modification is the fear that it would become possible to alter 'essential characteristics' of a future person, thereby possibly violating the child's right to an open future. As only the nuclear DNA would contain the ingredients for individual characteristics, modification of the mtDNA is often considered less controversial than modification of the nuclear DNA. This paper discusses the tenability of this dichotomy. After having clarified the concept of germ-line modification, it argues that modification of the mtDNA is not substantively different from modification of the nuclear DNA in terms of its effects on the identity of the future person. Subsequently the paper assesses how this conclusion affects the moral evaluation of nuclear transfer to prevent mtDNA disorders. It concludes that the moral acceptability of germ-line modification does not depend on whether it alters the identity of the future child-all germ-line modifications do-but on whether it safeguards the child's right to an open future. If nuclear transfer to prevent mtDNA disorders becomes safe and effective, then dismissing it because it involves germ-line modification is unjustified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Bredenoord
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Stratenum, 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
de Wert G, Dondorp W, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B, Barri P, Diedrich K. Intrafamilial medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:504-9. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
48
|
Provoost V, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Gerris J, Van de Velde A, Dhont M. To continue or discontinue storage of cryopreserved embryos? Patients' decisions in view of their child wish. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:861-72. [PMID: 21247922 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cryopreservation of supernumerary embryos resulting from IVF treatment offers extra chances to conceive. The objective of this study is to describe patients' decisions to continue or discontinue storage of their embryos after a minimum storage period of 2 years. METHODS Female patients who had embryos stored at the Infertility Centre of the Ghent University Hospital (Belgium) were sent a mail questionnaire to be completed anonymously. RESULTS The questionnaire had a response rate of 79% (326/412). After an embryo storage period of at least 2 years, 40% of the couples who were still together wished to continue storage of their embryos. Half of these had no concrete plans for a transfer and wanted to postpone the decision or keep all options open. For those who decided to discontinue storage (60%), the main reason was the completion of their families. Despite the fact that the patients' child wish was the main factor in their storage decision, two groups of patients with distinct profiles made decisions that were inconsistent with their child wish: those who wanted to continue storage while not wanting a(nother) child (7% of those with no child wish), and those who wanted a(nother) child but decided to discontinue storage (25% of those with a child wish). Overall, these patients more often expressed emotional difficulties regarding this decision. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the importance of gaining more insight into patients' embryo storage decisions (along with their embryo disposition decisions) and into the emotional factors playing a role in patients' decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Provoost
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lui S, Blyth E, Clua E, Lasheras G, Mallorqui N, Boada M, Rodriguez I, Veiga A, Van Hoof W, Pennings G, Svitnev K. POSTER VIEWING SESSION - CROSS BORDER REPRODUCTIVE CARE. Hum Reprod 2011. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/26.s1.76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
50
|
Wong C, Yong A, Pennings G, Kritharides L. Elevated Plasma sCD147 Concentration in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction—Potential Marker of Plaque Instability. Heart Lung Circ 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2011.05.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|