BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis (Revised Edition 2017; First edition 2007)

This is an updated guideline for the diagnosis and management of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis, first published in 2007. It was produced by the Standards of Care Committee of the British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, using accredited methods. Allergic rhinitis is common and affects 10-15% of children and 26% of adults in the UK, it affects quality of life, school and work attendance, and is a risk factor for development of asthma. Allergic rhinitis is diagnosed by history and examination, supported by specific allergy tests. Topical nasal corticosteroids are the treatment of choice for moderate to severe disease. Combination therapy with intranasal corticosteroid plus intranasal antihistamine is more effective than either alone and provides second line treatment for those with rhinitis poorly controlled on monotherapy. Immunotherapy is highly effective when the specific allergen is the responsible driver for the symptoms. Treatment of rhinitis is associated with benefits for asthma. Non-allergic rhinitis also is a risk factor for the development of asthma and may be eosinophilic and steroid-responsive or neurogenic and non- inflammatory. Non-allergic rhinitis may be a presenting complaint for systemic disorders such as granulomatous or eosinophilic polyangiitis, and sarcoidoisis. Infective rhinitis can be caused by viruses, and less commonly by bacteria, fungi and protozoa.

EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR) is an allergic disorder of the nose and eyes affecting about a fifth of the general population. Symptoms of AR can be controlled with allergen avoidance measures and pharmacotherapy. However, many patients continue to have ongoing symptoms and an impaired quality of life; pharmacotherapy may also induce some side-effects. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represents the only currently available treatment that targets the underlying pathophysiology, and it may have a disease-modifying effect. Either the subcutaneous (SCIT) or sublingual (SLIT) routes may be used. This Guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Taskforce on AIT for AR and is part of the EAACI presidential project "EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy." It aims to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations and has been informed by a formal systematic review and meta-analysis. Its generation has followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) approach. The process included involvement of the full range of stakeholders. In general, broad evidence for the clinical efficacy of AIT for AR exists but a product-specific evaluation of evidence is recommended. In general, SCIT and SLIT are recommended for both seasonal and perennial AR for its short-term benefit. The strongest evidence for long-term benefit is documented for grass AIT (especially for the grass tablets) where long-term benefit is seen. To achieve long-term efficacy, it is recommended that a minimum of 3 years of therapy is used. Many gaps in the evidence base exist, particularly around long-term benefit and use in children.

Allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is in the process of developing Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis. To inform the development of clinical recommendations, we undertook a systematic review to assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety of AIT in the management of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

METHODS

We searched nine international biomedical databases for published, in-progress, and unpublished evidence. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers against predefined eligibility criteria and critically appraised using established instruments. Our primary outcomes of interest were symptom, medication, and combined symptom and medication scores. Secondary outcomes of interest included cost-effectiveness and safety. Data were descriptively summarized and then quantitatively synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 5960 studies of which 160 studies satisfied our eligibility criteria. There was a substantial body of evidence demonstrating significant reductions in standardized mean differences (SMD) of symptom (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.63, -0.42), medication (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.49, -0.26), and combined symptom and medication (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.69, -0.30) scores while on treatment that were robust to prespecified sensitivity analyses. There was in comparison a more modest body of evidence on effectiveness post-discontinuation of AIT, suggesting a benefit in relation to symptom scores.

CONCLUSIONS

AIT is effective in improving symptom, medication, and combined symptom and medication scores in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis while on treatment, and there is some evidence suggesting that these benefits are maintained in relation to symptom scores after discontinuation of therapy.

Anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia: experience from a drug allergy centre in the UK

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis during general anaesthesia is rare but often severe. Identification of the cause of anaphylaxis and recommendation of a range of drugs or agents likely to be safer for future surgery is a collaborative venture between the allergists and the anaesthesiologists, but it often poses a significant challenge.

METHODS

A total of 31 patients who attended the Drug Allergy Unit at University College London Hospital with suspected perioperative anaphylaxis between March 2013 and January 2016 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The culprit drug was identified in 21 patients (67.7%): antibiotics (n = 11, 52.3%), neuromuscular blocking agents (n = 8, 38.1%), morphine (n = 1, 4.8%) and gelofusine (n = 1, 4.8%). No cause was identified in six patients (19.4%), and four patients (12.9%) had non-allergic reactions.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that antibiotics and neuromuscular blocking agents are common causative agents of perioperative anaphylaxis in the United Kingdom.

Rhinitis in children: common clinical presentations and differential diagnoses

Rhinitis is a common presentation in childhood. Acute virally induced rhinitis is generally self-limiting and usually does not require medical attention. Whilst allergic rhinitis is the focus of the paediatric allergist, the presentation of other diseases or comorbidities that can complicate or mimic allergic rhinitis needs to be considered. Effects on the child's quality of life also need to be addressed. Rhinitis can be associated with asthma and other significant comorbidities: importantly, non-allergic rhinitis can sometimes be a consequence of systemic immune impairment. The diagnosis of rhinitis is based on clinical findings with directed investigations. Nasal nitric oxide measurement is an emerging diagnostic tool and helpful particularly in relation to evaluating the differential diagnosis in more difficult rhinitis. Successfully identifying the cause of rhinitis in childhood and associated comorbidities can ensure that the patient is successfully treated as described in the recently published EAACI Pediatric Rhinitis Position Paper.

Paediatric rhinitis: position paper of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Rhinitis is a common problem in childhood and adolescence and impacts negatively on physical, social and psychological well-being. This position paper, prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Taskforce on Rhinitis in Children, aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and therapy of paediatric rhinitis. Rhinitis is characterized by at least two nasal symptoms: rhinorrhoea, blockage, sneezing or itching. It is classified as allergic rhinitis, infectious rhinitis and nonallergic, noninfectious rhinitis. Similar symptoms may occur with other conditions such as adenoidal hypertrophy, septal deviation and nasal polyps. Examination by anterior rhinoscopy and allergy tests may help to substantiate a diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. Avoidance of relevant allergens may be helpful for allergic rhinitis (AR). Oral and intranasal antihistamines and nasal corticosteroids are both appropriate for first-line AR treatment although the latter are more effective. Once-daily forms of corticosteroids are preferred given their improved safety profile. Potentially useful add-on therapies for AR include oral leukotriene receptor antagonists, short bursts of a nasal decongestant, saline douches and nasal anticholinergics. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is helpful in IgE-mediated AR and may prevent the progression of allergic disease. There are still a number of areas that need to be clarified in the management of rhinitis in children and adolescents.

Sublingual immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: indications, efficacy and safety

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is now an established treatment for allergic rhinitis. Whilst several systematic reviews have now confirmed clinical efficacy and safety, recent analysis also confirms that therapeutic benefit persists for several years after the com- pletion of SLIT. Such findings, along with the obvious ease of administration of sublingual preparations, have clearly promoted SLIT as an attractive option for treatment of allergic rhinitis resistant to medical treatment. This article reviews the development, efficacy and safety of SLIT in allergic rhinitis and the current indications for its use.

Lack of association between IgA deficiency and respiratory atopy in young male adults

BACKGROUND

The issue of atopy and increased serum IgE in IgA deficiency is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of IgA deficiency and its relationship with respiratory atopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study on 4700 consecutive young males (age range 18-23), who underwent a health screen for admission to the Italian Airforce Academy between 1993 and 1995 was conducted. Serum IgA was measured by immunoturbidimetry and total and specific IgE by fluorescent enzyme immunoassay (Phadiatop FEIA, Pharmacia Cap System). Airway responsiveness was assessed by methacholine challenge.

RESULTS

IgA deficiency was detected in 0.34% (16/4700) subjects and atopy was detected in 8.6% (406/4700). The mean IgA was 243 mg/dl (95% CI 107, 442) in the 406 atopic subjects and 238 mg/dl (95% CI 100, 441) in 1544 controls. Only 6 (37.5%) of the IgA deficient subjects had subnormal IgE levels and 6 were positive in the fluorescent EIA. None of the IgA deficient patients presented with respiratory hyper-reactivity.

CONCLUSION

Atopy is not more prevalent in young male adult IgA deficient subjects, who rather display a high frequency of recurrent sinusitis.

[Environmental monitoring and health monitoring for personnel exposed to inhalation anesthetics]

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to verify the results of medical surveillance for personnel exposed to inhaled anaesthetics in operating rooms (300 exposed), and estimate the level of pollution in operating theatres of a university hospital.

METHOD

Determination of the baseline and final value of the environmental anaesthetics by infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy; medical check-up and blood tests.

RESULTS

During our observation we found in all rooms (new rooms and older rooms) values of nitrous oxide and isoflurane acceptable, all the anaesthetic's concentration are below the limits proposed by C.M. number 5 of the 14/03/89. Personnel reported subjective symptoms especially anxiety, but no blood alteration related to exposure were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Technical precautions as use of low flow system, replacement of nitrous oxide with air, careful check of anaesthetic machine, and behavioral rules have decreased the emission of anaesthetics in the environment. Blood tests are found are not a valid index of possible damage caused by exposure. A large percentage of anaesthesiologists are found to have anxiety.

[Spinal diseases in the health setting. Epidemiologic findings at a hospital in eastern Sicily]

The importance of spinal column disorders has long been known, both for their frequency in working environments and the social consequences they provoke, i.e. absence from work and social insurance costs. Our study focussed on 800 health care workers: nursing personnel who provide direct patient care, and 150 office workers of Sicily Hospital. We estimated column pathologies by using Colombini, Occhipinti, Grieco method. On the basis of our results we may affirm that the column disorders are more frequent in hospital assistants: S.A.P. II degree 22% S.A.P. III degree 10%, in office workers S.A.P. II degree 6% S.A.P. III degree 3%.

The eosinophil and the eye

Personal studies in allergic eye diseases reviewed in this paper indicate that: 1. An increased number and an abnormal distribution of eosinophils is present in conjunctival biopsies of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). 2. Eosinophil and eosinophil products, such as ECP, are also increased in tears of VKC patients and, in hay fever conjunctivitis, accumulate during the late-phase of allergic reaction following specific allergen challenge. 3. Circulating eosinophils of VKC patients show a typical activation phenotypic profile which is associated with increased serum level of eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin/protein X. A clinical study of the modulatory effect of cetirizine on the early and late phase of the allergic reaction as well as on the eosinophil activation and tissue recruitment following conjunctival allergen challenge is reported as an example of the need to evaluate eosinophil functions when investigating anti-allergic drugs. Drugs modulating various aspects of eosinophil function could play a primary role in the treatment of allergic eye disease.

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a model of 5q cytokine gene cluster disease

Clinical studies of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) patients show that total IgE serum levels are increased even in the absence of IgE antibodies to common allergens. Activated eosinophils are also a constant feature of VKC at both the circulation (cytofluorimetry) and tissue (tear cytology and conjunctival scrapings) levels. Moreover, allergen challenge induces a prolonged inflammatory reaction with a prevalent participation of eosinophils, lymphocytes and possibly basophils. Immunohistochemical studies of VKC biopsies show a multicellular inflammatory infiltrate with prevalence of activated eosinophils, mast cells and CD4 lymphocytes in both epithelium and subepithelium. Mediator studies indicate that eosinophil products (eosinophil peroxidase, eosinophinal cationic protein and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin/eosinophil protein X) are increased in both serum and tears, where tryptase and interleukin (IL)-5 are also detectable in higher amounts than in controls. On the basis of these findings, we postulate that VKC can represent a phenotypic model of up-regulation of the cytokine gene cluster on chromosome 5q which through its products (IL-3, IL-4, IL-5 and granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor) regulates Th2 prevalence, IgE production as well as mast cell and eosinophil growth and function in VKC.

Genetic and environmental factors in the changing incidence of allergy

Several studies have indicated that the incidence and prevalence of allergic diseases are increasing. Such data should not be regarded as mere statistical curiosities, but should be analysed to provide information on the factors contributing to allergy and its changing epidemiology. Extensive evidence has been accumulated that allergic diseases are polyfactorial. Data reported in the literature and particularly twin studies have also suggested polyfactorial control of individual allergy variables, such as total serum levels IgE and IgG4, specificity of antibody response, mediator release from inflammatory cells and target organ response. Markers of genetic susceptibility may identify individuals at risk for allergy, while identification of the environmental factors influencing the phenotypic expression of allergy can be useful in evaluating the cost-benefit ratio of taking preventive measures in such individuals.