Rationale and design of the ESC Heart Failure III Registry - Implementation and discovery

AIMS

Heart failure outcomes remain poor despite advances in therapy. The European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure III Registry (ESC HF III Registry) aims to characterize HF clinical features and outcomes and to assess implementation of guideline-recommended therapy in Europe and other ESC affiliated countries.

METHODS

Between 1 November 2018 and 31 December 2020, 10 162 patients with chronic or acute/worsening HF with reduced, mildly reduced, or preserved ejection fraction were enrolled from 220 centres in 41 European or ESC affiliated countries. The ESC HF III Registry collected data on baseline characteristics (hospital or clinic presentation), hospital course, diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in hospital and at the clinic visit; and on outcomes at 12-month follow-up. These data include demographics, medical history, physical examination, biomarkers and imaging, quality of life, treatments, and interventions - including drug doses and reasons for non-use, and cause-specific outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The ESC HF III Registry will provide comprehensive and unique insight into contemporary HF characteristics, treatment implementation, and outcomes, and may impact implementation strategies, clinical discovery, trial design, and public policy.

Greater cardiovascular risk reduction with once-daily fixed combination of three antihypertensive agents and statin versus free-drug combination: The ALL-IN-ONE trial

BACKGROUND

The ultimate goal of antihypertensive therapy is cardiovascular risk (CVR) reduction. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily fixed combination (ODFC) versus free-drug combination (FDC) of 3antihypertensive agents and statin.

METHODS

The ALL-IN-ONE trial was a 12-week randomized, prospective, multicenter trial. A total of 305 hypertensive patients were randomized 1:1. The "fixed group" was given an ODFC of perindropil 10mg plus indapamide 2.5mg plus amlodipine 5 or 10mg plus atorvastatin 20mg. The "free group" was given a FDC of the 3antihypertensive agents plus atorvastatin 20mg. Primary end-points were the differences in clinic BP, cholesterol levels and CVR risk between the 2 groups after treatments. Secondary end-points included intragroup differences in clinic BP. Safety and compliance were also assessed.

RESULTS

At 12-weeks, the fixed group had lower systolic BP and similar diastolic BP compared to the free group. BP targets at week 12 were more commonly reached with fixed than free combination (89% and 80% respectively, p=0.048). For cholesterol serum in both groups there was a significant reduction of values. Also CVR reduction was greater in those taking ODF. Safety was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conversely, compliance was significantly greater in the fixed-group vs. the free-group.

CONCLUSION

This randomized trial shows that ODF combination of perindropil, indapamide and amlodipine is as safe as free combination of the 3 drugs, but is associated with a greater efficacy in BP control, compliance and, associated with statin, in cholesterol reduction. A better cardiovascular risk control is achieved with ODF combination than with a free administration. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02710539.

Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade in Adult Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analyses

BACKGROUND

Medications aimed at inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) have been used extensively for preventing cardiovascular and renal complications in patients with diabetes, but data that compare their clinical effectiveness are limited. We aimed to compare the effects of classes of RAS blockers on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in adults with diabetes.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Eligible trials were identified by electronic searches in PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 January 2004 to 17 July 2014). Interventions of interest were angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and direct renin (DR) inhibitors. The primary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke-singly and as a composite endpoint, major cardiovascular outcome-and end-stage renal disease [ESRD], doubling of serum creatinine, and all-cause mortality-singly and as a composite endpoint, progression of renal disease. Secondary endpoints were angina pectoris and hospitalization for heart failure. In all, 71 trials (103,120 participants), with a total of 14 different regimens, were pooled using network meta-analyses. When compared with ACE inhibitor, no other RAS blocker used in monotherapy and/or combination was associated with a significant reduction in major cardiovascular outcomes: ARB (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.90-1.18), ACE inhibitor plus ARB (0.97; 95% CrI 0.79-1.19), DR inhibitor plus ACE inhibitor (1.32; 95% CrI 0.96-1.81), and DR inhibitor plus ARB (1.00; 95% CrI 0.73-1.38). For the risk of progression of renal disease, no significant differences were detected between ACE inhibitor and each of the remaining therapies: ARB (OR 1.10; 95% CrI 0.90-1.40), ACE inhibitor plus ARB (0.97; 95% CrI 0.72-1.29), DR inhibitor plus ACE inhibitor (0.99; 95% CrI 0.65-1.57), and DR inhibitor plus ARB (1.18; 95% CrI 0.78-1.84). No significant differences were showed between ACE inhibitors and ARBs with respect to all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, hospitalization for heart failure, ESRD, or doubling serum creatinine. Findings were limited by the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the included studies. Potential inconsistency was identified in network meta-analyses of stroke and angina pectoris, limiting the conclusiveness of findings for these single endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with diabetes, comparisons of different RAS blockers showed similar effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs on major cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Compared with monotherapies, the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an ARB failed to provide significant benefits on major outcomes. Clinicians should discuss the balance between benefits, costs, and potential harms with individual diabetes patients before starting treatment.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42014014404.

Managing cardiovascular risk in menopausal women

Blood pressure control and prevention of glucose intolerance are primary factors in overcoming the increased cardiovascular risks in menopausal women. This heightened risk may partially be explained by the metabolic syndrome - a precursor of type 2 diabetes - in which the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system may play a pivotal role. Once diabetes occurs, the cardiovascular risk is considerably greater in postmenopausal women than in men - especially if hypertension is also present. An additional risk factor, weight gain, is common in postmenopausal women not treated with hormone replacement therapy. Rigorous control of blood pressure has been shown to be particularly beneficial in women with metabolic syndrome; a reduction in blood pressure can reduce the mortality rate of ischemic stroke. The administration of hormone replacement therapy can also reduce the likelihood of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women; therefore therapy should be started early in the menopausal transition to maximize cardiovascular protection. As such, an ideal hormone replacement therapy that can overcome hypertension, prevent body weight gain and control serum triglycerides offers an important advance in cardiovascular risk management during the menopause.

Effects of hormone replacement therapy or raloxifene on ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness in treated hypertensive postmenopausal women

The administration of oral raloxifene in 30 postmenopausal hypertensive women was evaluated to demonstrate its effect on arterial stiffness. Casual and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and pulse-wave velocity (PWV) data were obtained before and after patients received raloxifene, estrogen-progestin replacement therapy, or placebo in a randomized crossover study. It was shown that the 2 therapies decreased BP and carotid-femoral PWV, and the effect of raloxifene on vascular compliance was independent of the effects on BP.

In patients with coronary artery disease endothelial function is associated with plasma levels of C-reactive protein and is improved by optimal medical therapy

BACKGROUND

Endothelial function is impaired in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD); in these patients plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and impaired endothelial function are related to future cardiac events. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of medical therapy on endothelial function and CRP in patients with CAD.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients (52 men, 21 women, mean age 66 +/- 9 years) with CAD and 32 control subjects (25 men, 7 women, mean age 65 +/- 11 years) were enrolled in the study. The endothelial function was evaluated by means of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery following ischemia and CRP by means of a high-sensitivity assay. After baseline evaluation of CRP and FMD all patients received full medical therapy for 3 months and were then again tested for endothelial function and CRP.

RESULTS

Compared to healthy controls, patients had significantly more impaired endothelial function (FMD 3.6 +/- 3.2 vs 8 +/- 2.4%, p < 0.01) and higher CRP plasma levels (1.6 +/- 0.9 vs 0.9 +/- 0.56 mg/dl, p < 0.05). At baseline a significant negative correlation was found between CRP plasma levels and FMD in patients with CAD (r = -0.56, p < 0.05) while no correlation was found in controls. Medical therapy resulted in a significant improvement in endothelial function (3.64 +/- 3 vs 7.2 +/- 3.5%, p < 0.01), and a decrease of CRP (-0.26 +/- 0.19, p < 0.01); the changes in CRP and FMD were independent of the drug used. A positive correlation was found between the improvement in FMD and the degree of CRP reduction (r = 0.57, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CAD plasma levels of CRP are associated with an impaired endothelial function suggesting a correlation between inflammation and the integrity of the endothelium. Full medical therapy reduces CRP with a parallel improvement in endothelial function.

Effect of estradiol valerate alone or in association with cyproterone acetate upon vascular function of postmenopausal women at increased risk for cardiovascular disease

OBJECTIVES

a large body of evidence has been accumulated suggesting that impairment of vascular endothelial function is an initial step in the development of atherosclerosis. Recent studies have shown that estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women (PMW) improves endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) while the cyclical adjunct of a progestin may reverse this effect.

METHODS

the purpose of this study was to evaluate endothelium-dependent, FMD in the brachial artery and the plasma levels of Endothelin-1 in menopausal females treated with estradiol valerate with and without cyclical cyproterone acetate in 20 PMW (mean age 64+/-6 years) with more than one risk factor for coronary artery disease. After a baseline evaluation, PMW entered a double-blinded, placebo controlled single cross-over study and were randomized to receive either estradiol valerate (2 mg) for 21 days or estradiol valerate (2 mg) for 11 days and estradiol valerate (2 mg) and cyproterone acetate (1 mg) for 10 days. Patients were crossed-over the complementary treatment 7 days after completing the first treatment phase. The study of forearm blood flow was repeated at the end of each treatment period.

RESULTS

estradiol valerate significantly increased FMD as compared with baseline (12+/-3 vs. 7+/-4%, P<0.01) the adjunct of cyproterone acetate did not affect the effect of estradiol valerate upon FMD (12+/-3 vs. 11+/-4%, P=NS). Similarly reactive hyperemic flow increased after estradiol valerate alone (24%) or in association with cyproterone acetate (24%) compared with baseline. Plasma levels of Endothelin-1 were significantly reduced by estradiol valerate alone or in association with cyproterone acetate.

CONCLUSIONS

in conclusion hormone replacement therapy with estradiol valerate and cyproterone acetate improves endothelial function and reduces plasma levels of Endothelin-1 in PMW at risk of coronary artery disease. These effects may be relevant for cardioprotection.

How progestins influence the cardiovascular effect of hormone replacement therapy

Hormone replacement therapy aims to protect against osteoporosis and alleviate fastidious menopausal symptoms such as hot flushes, depression, sleep disturbances and vaginal dryness. In view of the acknowledgement of estrogen deficiency as a major trigger for the acceleration of cardiovascular risk after menopause, hormone replacement therapy may also be proposed as a substantial beneficial cardioprotective agent. The effects of progestins on lipoprotein profile and vasomotor tone are dependent on the chemical structure and the scheme of administration of progestins, with androgenic progestins and cyclical therapy having a potential detrimental effect. Prospective primary and secondary prevention studies, however, suggest that the adjunct of non-androgenic progestins to estrogen therapy is at least as effective as estrogen replacement therapy in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Data from recent randomized secondary prevention studies have to be viewed with caution.

Effect of sildenafil citrate upon myocardial ischemia in patients with chronic stable angina in therapy with beta-blockers

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibition is potentially hazardous and that it increases the risk of cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. This study sought to evaluate whether PDE5 inhibition with sildenafil exerts any effect on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in patients on beta-blockers.

METHODS

Fourteen patients underwent a baseline exercise test off-therapy and were then started on atenolol (100 mg once daily). After a run-in phase of 1 week, patients underwent a second exercise test and were randomized to receive either sildenafil (50 mg) or placebo given in a random order on two different occasions, 2 days apart. Exercise test was repeated 2 hours after the administration of sildenafil or placebo.

RESULTS

All patients had a > 1 mm ST-segment depression while off-therapy. Eight patients had a negative exercise test response after atenolol, which was unaltered by the adjunct of either sildenafil or placebo. In the remaining subjects, atenolol significantly prolonged the time to 1 mm ST-segment depression and the exercise time. Sildenafil and placebo did not reverse the beneficial effect of atenolol upon exercise-induced myocardial ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

PDE5 inhibition does not worsen exercise capacity and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with chronic stable angina whose symptoms and exercise test response are well controlled by beta-blocker therapy.

Can menopause be considered an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease?

Following the menopause, women develop coronary artery disease at the same rate as men. The best documented change observed in the risk factors linked to ovarian exhaustion is an alteration in lipid composition. More recent studies, however, suggest that the increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after menopause cannot be fully explained by changes in plasma lipoproteins, and support the concept that ovarian hormone deprivation has a widespread impact on the cardiovascular system, with a direct harmful effect on vessel-wall physiology. After the menopause, subjects free from cardiovascular diseases show vascular hyperactivity and a poor vasodilator reserve; the rate of increase in the incidence of arterial hypertension in women is higher than that observed among males of the same age; altogether, cardiovascular diseases become the number one cause of death among women. A large number of mechanistic studies have shown that estrogens, through either direct or genomic-dependent activities, produce beneficial effects on the factors controlling blood flow and plaque formation. Nevertheless, results from recent randomized clinical trials are challenging the belief that postmenopausal hormone therapy protects against coronary artery disease.

Anti-ischemic effect of chronic oestrogen replacement therapy alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate in different replacement schemes

BACKGROUND

Oestrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women has a protective effect upon the cardiovascular system and improves exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Although in hormone replacement schemes progestins are required to reduce the likelihood of uterine malignancies, little is known on the cardiovascular effect of progestins. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of oestrogen replacement alone and two different estrogen-progestin replacement therapy schemes upon exercise induced myocardial ischemia.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The study population included 18 female menopausal patients with coronary artery disease. After a baseline exercise test patients received conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) 0.625 mg alone for 30 days when they underwent a second exercise test and were randomized to receive in a cross-over design medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) either in continuous combined therapy (2.5 mg/daily) for 28 days or in cyclical therapy (10 mg o.d. from day 16 to day 28).

RESULTS

After CEE alone two patients with a previously positive exercise test showed a negative exercise test. CEE increased time to 1 mm ST compared to baseline (352+/-185 vs 265+/-133 s, P<0.01). In the 2 pts in whom the exercise test was negative after CEE the test remained negative during continuous combined MPA therapy while become positive during cyclical MPA. CEE+continuous combined MPA increased both time to 1 mm ST and exercise time compared to baseline (386+/-165 vs 265+/-133 s, P<0.01 and 545+/-198 vs 465+/-186 s, P<0.05, respectively). No difference was found between baseline and CEE+cyclical MPA in either time to 1 mm ST or exercise time (268+/-164 vs 265+/-133 s, P=NS and 455+/-223 vs 465+/-186 s, P=NS, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Continuous combined therapy with CEE+MPA improves exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in female patients with coronary artery disease while the beneficial effect of CEE is reduced by cyclical therapy.

Comparative cardiovascular effects of different progestins in menopause

Progesterone receptors are present in the arterial wall and it is, therefore, likely that the arterial effects of progestins are mediated through progesterone receptors as well as through down-regulation of the estradiol receptor. Progestin therapy affects arterial function, as it can stabilize arteries in a state of vasomotor instability, but may also induce vasoconstriction of estrogenized vessels. Thus, the cardiovascular effects of progestins may influence the cardioprotective effect of estrogens. There has been some concern that a combined estrogen-progestogen therapy may attenuate some of estrogen's beneficial effects on cardiovascular health. This is a reflection of the past epidemiologic studies which have used primarily unopposed estrogen. The PEPI trial is the only large-scale, long-term study to compare directly the effects of different combined hormone replacement therapy regimens upon plasma lipids in healthy women. This study has shown that the adjunctive clinical impact of different progestogens on the beneficial effect of estrogen replacement therapy is trivial. It has never been proved that in normocholesterolemic women, e.g., those included in the PEPI trial, the increase in HDL reduces cardiovascular mortality or morbidity. Based on the results of PEPI, hormone replacement therapy has positive effects on key heart disease risk factors and endometrial tissue, and the magnitude of those effects does not differ significantly across the hormone replacement therapy regimens used. At present there are only few and inconclusive data available on the vascular effect of progestins in menopausal women. Some studies found that progestins reduced the beneficial effect of estrogens, while others did not. Our group has recently shown that different estrogen-progestin treatments have different effects upon vascular reactivity and that a careful selection of the progestin to be added to estrogen is of capital importance to preserve, or even enhance the positive vascular effects of estrogens. Few epidemiological studies have investigated the effect of adding a progestin to estrogen therapy upon cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, and all have suggested that hormone replacement therapy may be more effective than estrogen replacement alone in reducing cardiovascular events in primary prevention. The results of the recently published Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) have added some critical data on the effect of hormone replacement therapy for secondary prevention in women with coronary artery disease. The study, however, is affected by several important methodological and statistical problems, which make its interpretation difficult and its conclusions useless for clinical practice. The results of the study should be evaluated with caution by physicians who give advice on hormone replacement therapy, and no woman should be taken off hormone replacement therapy because of HERS. Of importance, the results of HERS should not be used to suggest alternative forms of treatment, especially the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), for cardiovascular protection in postmenopausal women.

Time course and determinants of left ventricular function recovery after primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the importance of time in relation to treatment, time course and determinants of recovery of left ventricular (LV) function in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).

BACKGROUND

Myocardial salvage has been shown to be dependent on the time elapsed from the onset of AMI to reperfusion.

METHODS

Left ventricular function was evaluated at hospital admission, after angioplasty, at 24 h and 6 months by both echocardiography and angiography and at 1, 7, 30, 90 and 180 days by echocardiography in 101 consecutive patients.

RESULTS

Patients were allocated to three groups according to interval between symptom onset and angioplasty: <2 h (group A), 2 to 4 h (group B) and >4 h (group C). Patients in groups A and B showed a progressive improvement of LV function between day 7 and day 90, which became statistically significant at day 30 (p < 0.01). No LV function changes were noted in group C patients. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade <3 at 24 h was not associated with any significant change in LV volume and function during the six-month follow-up period. Restenosis, when associated with TIMI flow grade 3 in the infarct-related vessel, did not influence LV function. Flow grade <3 of the infarct-related artery was not associated with any improvement of cardiac events independently from the time to treatment at the initial procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing primary PTCA for AMI have a good recovery of LV function if TIMI flow grade 3 is restored within 4 h. Coronary angioplasty limits further remodeling of the LV in patients treated after 4 h.

Acute electrophysiologic effect of estradiol 17beta in menopausal women

Sixteen postmenopausal women underwent electrophysiologic study before and 20 minutes after the administration of sublingual estradiol 17beta or placebo. Estradiol 17beta significantly affected electrophysiologic parameters, thereby suggesting its role in the development of palpitations in women.

Natural progesterone, but not medroxyprogesterone acetate, enhances the beneficial effect of estrogen on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the effects of estrogen/transvaginal progesterone gel with estrogen/medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease or previous myocardial infarction, or both.

BACKGROUND

Estrogen therapy beneficially affects exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in postmenopausal women; however, women with an intact uterus also take progestin to protect against uterine malignancies. The effects of combination estrogen/progestin therapy on myocardial ischemia are unknown.

METHODS

Eighteen postmenopausal women (mean +/- SD age 59+/-7 years) were given 17-beta-estradiol in single-blinded manner for four weeks (1 mg/day for three weeks then 2 mg/day for one week). Estradiol (2 mg/day) was then continued, and the patients were randomized (double-blind) for 12 days to either transvaginal progesterone gel (90 mg on alternate days) and oral MPA placebo (10 mg/day), or vice versa. After another two weeks on estradiol alone, the patients crossed over to progestin treatment and repeated the protocol on the opposite treatment. Patients underwent treadmill exercise testing after each estradiol phase and at day 10 of each progestin phase.

RESULTS

Exercise time to myocardial ischemia increased after the first estrogen phase as compared with baseline (mean difference with 95% confidence interval [CI]: 72 s [34 to 110], p = 0.001), and was increased by combination estradiol/progesterone therapy as compared with estradiol/MPA therapy (92 s [35 to 149], p = 0.001)). Two patients (11%) were withdrawn while taking estradiol/MPA owing to unstable angina.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination estrogen/transvaginal progesterone gel increases exercise time to myocardial ischemia, as compared with estrogen/MPA. These results imply that the choice of progestin in women at higher cardiovascular risk requires careful consideration.

Predictors of long-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing multiple vessel stenting for coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery stenting reduces the restenosis rate compared to coronary angioplasty alone. With the increased number of procedures completed with stent placement there has been a parallel increase in the number of procedures performed in patients with multivessel disease and therefore a rise in the number of patients receiving multiple stents. The clinical outcome and the predictors of the outcome of patients receiving multiple stents are not known.

METHODS

To evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing multiple stenting we studied 133 consecutive patients who had received > 1 stent in at least two vessels. A total of 375 coronary stents (2.8 stent per patient) were implanted in elective procedure situations. Clinical follow-up was complete in 100%.

RESULTS

During follow-up 2 patients (1.5%) died (1 cardiac death), 4 patients (3%) had acute myocardial infarction, 96 patients (72.1%) remained angina-free, and 31 patients (23.3 %) had recurrence of angina. Repeat revascularization procedure was performed in 45 patients (33.8%); 43 patients (32.3%) underwent coronary angioplasty; 2 patients (1.5%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. The female gender and the presence of diabetes were significant (p < 0.05) predictors for coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting procedures during follow-up. Recurrence of angina was also significantly (p < 0.05) associated with unstable angina at the time of the first procedure as well as diabetes and the female gender. Diabetes, the female gender and unstable angina were highly predictive factors of major adverse cardiac events during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple vessel stenting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease is associated with an acceptable immediate and long-term clinical outcome and could be considered as an alternative therapeutic option in these patients. Predictors of an adverse long-term outcome are the female gender and the presence of diabetes mellitus.

The relative effects of progesterone and progestins in hormone replacement therapy

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was initially given to protect women against osteoporosis and alleviate menopausal symptoms, such as hot flashes, depression, sleep disturbances, and vaginal dryness. In view of the understanding of oestrogen deficiency as a major trigger for the acceleration of cardiovascular risk after menopause, HRT may also be proposed as a substantial beneficial cardioprotective agent. Progestins, which may be added to oestrogen in combined HRT to reduce the risk of uterine malignancy, have a number of potential adverse effects on the cardiovascular system which could even attenuate the benefit of unopposed oestrogen replacement therapy in post-menopausal women.

Cardioprotective effects of ovarian hormones and the HERS in perspective

The increased population of women in menopause living in the industrialized countries is associated with an increase of diseases which are dependent or facilitated by a state of estrogen deficiency such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Several studies have shown that estrogen replacement therapy reduces the occurrence of coronary and may be of cerebrovascular disease by nearly 50% in treated women compared to non-users. These findings are supported by the evidence that estrogens have a beneficial effect on cholesterol metabolism and deposition, contributing to the inhibition of atherosclerotic plaque formation in arterial walls as well as a direct effect on the vessel wall. Progestins may, in some cases, counteract the beneficial effect of estrogens upon cardiovascular functions. More androgenic progestins may have a detrimental effect upon vascular reactivity while less androgenic progestins seem not to reduce the beneficial effect of estrogens. Of interest, continuous combined administration of hormone replacement therapy seem to be preferable for women with coronary artery disease or for those with increased cardiovascular risk. Case-control and cohort studies have shown that estrogen progestin therapy is associated with a significant reduction of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The HERS study has added critical data regarding the cardioprotective effect of hormone replacement therapy in elderly women with proven coronary artery disease. Because of the several methodological and statistical flaws of the HERS study, further studies are warranted to evaluate the effect of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular prognosis. Large scale randomized studies will evaluate the effect of estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy upon cardiovascular events in menopausal women. Until completion of these studies hormone replacement therapy in women with increased cardiovascular risk should be seen with no enthusiasm but also with no fear.

Evidence of a role of endogenous estrogen in the modulation of autonomic nervous system

We studied heart rate variability in 14 healthy women before and after oophorectomy compared with 14 matched women who underwent hysterectomy with ovarian conservation. Surgical menopause induced a decline in cardiac vagal modulation with a shift toward sympathetic hyperactivity. Recovery of the baseline condition after 3 months of estrogen replacement therapy in oophorectomized women suggests a role of estrogen in the autonomic nervous control of the cardiovascular system.

Comparison of trimetazidine with atenolol in patients with syndrome X: effects on diastolic function and exercise tolerance

BACKGROUND

Trimetazidine has been shown to improve anginal symptoms without altering hemodynamic variables in patients with coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of trimetazidine and atenolol upon symptoms, resting left ventricular filling dynamics and exercise tolerance.

METHODS

Sixteen patients (3 males, 13 females, mean age 62 +/- 7 years) were randomized to receive trimetazidine for 2 weeks (20 mg 3 times daily) or atenolol (100 mg daily), according to a double-blind, randomized, cross-over, placebo-controlled design. At the end of each treatment period patients underwent symptom-limited exercise testing, an echocardiogram and a Doppler assessment of transmitral flow pattern. Daily life anginal symptoms were annotated on a diary throughout the study. Two patients discontinued trimetazidine because of severe palpitations and only 14 patients completed the study.

RESULTS

Atenolol significantly reduced the number of anginal episodes as compared to placebo or trimetazidine (0.44 +/- 0.53, 4.8 +/- 4, 2.9 +/- 4.9, p < 0.01). On atenolol, the exercise test was negative in 8 patients, but none of the patients had a negative test while on trimetazidine. Atenolol increased both time to 1 mm ST segment depression (668 +/- 213 vs 838 +/- 81 s, p < 0.05) and Doppler-derived indices of ventricular filling (E/A ratio 0.87 +/- 0.20 vs 1.21 +/- 0.26, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the beneficial effects of atenolol in improving symptoms, exercise performance and diastolic function in syndrome X patients. Trimetazidine did not exert any significant effect on any of the analyzed variables. Since trimetazidine has been previously shown to improve myocardial ischemia in patients with overt coronary artery disease to a similar extent of beta-blockers, it is likely that other mechanisms are responsible for angina in patients with syndrome X.

The acute effects of sublingual 17beta-estradiol on the cardiovascular system

The beneficial effects of estrogen in postmenopausal women have been well documented. Cardioprotection by estrogen, which is probably the result of several metabolic alterations, appears after 2 or more years of constant use. However, acute administration of estrogen (intravenous or intracoronary) was found to improve cardiac hemodynamics and function through various non-genomic mechanisms. This article reviews data on the consequences of sublingual administration of estrogen, a non-invasive and simple dosing route which is associated with rapid absorption and prompt cardiovascular reactions. It appears that sublingual estradiol at 1 or 2 mg may improve ischemia and exercise performance in women with coronary artery disease, and augment the aortic and brachial blood flow as a result of vasodilation, whereas larger doses (4 mg) may lead to a decrease in myocardial contractility and aortic blood flow, and a slight drop in blood pressure. More data are needed to evaluate the actual clinical significance of sublingual estradiol in healthy women, in situations when endothelial dysfunction is anticipated (diabetes, hypertension) and in women with diagnosed coronary artery disease.

Cardiovascular pharmacology of hormone replacement therapy

The incidence of cardiovascular disease in women is negligible before natural or surgically-induced menopause, and increases after menopause. Epidemiological data suggest that estrogen replacement therapy reduces the occurrence of coronary artery, and possibly cerebrovascular, disease by 25 to 50% in treated women compared with non-users. These findings are supported by the evidence that estrogens have a beneficial effect on cholesterol metabolism and deposition, contributing to the inhibition of atherosclerotic plaque formation in arterial walls. Early reports suggested that up to 60% of the protective effect of estrogens on coronary artery disease was attributable to favourable changes in plasma lipids. Reanalysis of the data indicated that the lipid changes probably account for approximately 25% of the cardioprotective effect of estrogens and that other effects are, therefore, likely to be important. The influence of estrogens on carbohydrate metabolism, atheroma formation and cardiovascular haemodynamics may also play an integral role in the overall beneficial effect of the hormones. Animal and human studies have shown that the administration of estrogens leads to a restoration of endothelial function, an increase in cardiac output, an increase in arterial flow velocity, a decrease in vascular resistance, and a decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Recent studies on hormone replacement regimens have shown that estrogens may favourably affect fibrinolysis and reduce plasma fibrinogen to premenopausal levels. Despite these effects of estrogens the recent Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) failed to show a cardioprotective effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in elderly women with coronary artery disease. However, the HERS study has several limitations and stands alone against the large body of evidence that suggest that HRT may reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity.

Oestrogens and the heart

The incidence of cardiovascular disease is lower in women before the menopause compared with men, while menopausal women have an incidence of coronary disease similar to that of men of the same age. This is mainly dependent upon oestrogen deficiency. Large-scale epidemiological studies have demonstrated that oestrogen replacement therapy leads to approximately 50 per cent reduction of cardiovascular disease in women taking hormones, compared with untreated women. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the cardiovascular risk reduction observed in women on oestrogen therapy. Oestrogens positively affect plasma lipids and exert a beneficial effect upon carbohydrate metabolism and the haemocoagulation profile. Oestrogens may also have anti-atherogenic properties. Recent in vitro studies have demonstrated that oestrogens may positively influence all the steps involved in the formation of the atherosclerotic plaque (accumulation of cholesterol in the arterial wall, arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation, platelet aggregation, collagen and elastin production). Angiographic studies conducted in humans have demonstrated that women on oestrogens have significantly less coronary disease and less severe occlusion scores compared with women not taking hormone replacement therapy. Animal and human studies have shown that oestrogens act as vasodilating substances. Endothelium-dependent mechanisms have been identified and imply that oestrogens act through the endothelial release, mainly, of nitric oxide, a potent vasodilating substance which has been identified with EDRF (endothelium derived relaxing factor). More recently, oestrogens have been shown to affect also the vascular tone in the absence of the endothelium. Therefore, endothelium-independent mechanisms could be involved in the pathogenesis of the oestrogens' vascular effects. There is evidence that oestrogens have calcium antagonistic properties; this mechanism may be responsible for the reduction of peripheral vascular resistance observed in women on hormone replacement therapy and may slow the progression of coronary artery disease. The menopausal age is characterized by an imbalance of the neurohormonal system. Sudden increases of plasma catecholamines are evident when women have hot flushes, a typical clinical sign of the menopausal period. The abnormal release of catecholamines may reduce coronary flow reserve and increase peripheral vascular resistance and, therefore, may be dangerous for the heart. It has been shown, by means of the study of heart rate variability, that oestrogens are effective in modulating the neurohormonal system. The reduction of sympathetic tone has beneficial effects on coronary flow reserve and may be important in explaining the cardioprotective effect of oestrogens. Peripheral and coronary vasodilation observed in women on hormone replacement therapy might be also due to the inhibition of the release of vasoconstrictor factors such as endothelin-1 by oestrogens. Therefore, oestrogens protect the heart against coronary artery disease and they are now regarded as being as important as aspirin and antihypertensive drugs were in the past. Hormone replacement therapy should be considered in every menopausal woman to possibly prevent the occurrence of cardiovascular disease or, if already present, to slow its progression.

Acute anti-ischemic effect of testosterone in men with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

The role of testosterone on the development of coronary artery disease in men is controversial. The evidence that men have a greater incidence of coronary artery disease than women of a similar age suggests a possible causal role of testosterone. Conversely, recent studies have shown that the hormone improves endothelium-dependent relaxation of coronary arteries in men. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of acute administration of testosterone on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in men.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After withdrawal of antianginal therapy, 14 men (mean age, 58+/-4 years) with coronary artery disease underwent 3 exercise tests according to the modified Bruce protocol on 3 different days (baseline and either testosterone or placebo given in a random order). The exercise tests were performed 30 minutes after administration of testosterone (2.5 mg IV in 5 minutes) or placebo. All patients showed at least 1-mm ST-segment depression during the baseline exercise test and after placebo, whereas only 10 patients had a positive exercise test after testosterone. Chest pain during exercise was reported by 12 patients during baseline and placebo exercise tests and by 8 patients after testosterone. Compared with placebo, testosterone increased time to 1-mm ST-segment depression (579+/-204 versus 471+/-210 seconds; P<0. 01) and total exercise time (631+/-180 versus 541+/-204 seconds; P<0. 01). Testosterone significantly increased heart rate at the onset of 1-mm ST-segment depression (135+/-12 versus 123+/-14 bpm; P<0.01) and at peak exercise (140+/-12 versus 132+/-12 bpm; P<0.01) and the rate-pressure product at the onset of 1-mm ST-segment depression (24 213+/-3750 versus 21 619+/-3542 mm Hgxbpm; P<0.05) and at peak exercise (26 746+/-3109 versus 22 527+/-5443 mm Hgxbpm; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term administration of testosterone induces a beneficial effect on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in men with coronary artery disease. This effect may be related to a direct coronary-relaxing effect.

Left ventricular dysfunction during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with syndrome X and positive myocardial perfusion scintigraphy

AIMS

A sizeable proportion of patients with angina, angiographically smooth coronary arteries and positive exercise test (syndrome X) have stress/rest myocardial perfusion defects. The aim of the study was to assess whether perfusion defects are dependent upon a reduction in coronary flow reserve causing regional left ventricular dysfunction in syndrome X patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two syndrome X patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). All had stress-induced perfusion defects documented by 99m-Tc-MIBI scintigraphy. Resting and peak DSE wall motion score index (WMSI) were evaluated. Six patients exhibited resting wall motion abnormalities in 10 segments (WMSI 1.05 +/- 0.11). DSE was positive in 12 patients (53%), in whom 16 myocardial segments were involved: of these, 12 were normokinetic and 4 hypokinetic at rest. Peak WMSI was 1.17 +/- 0.17 (p < 0.05 vs rest). Of the 12 patients with a positive DSE, 9 also showed diagnostic ECG changes and 6 complained of angina. Of the 10 patients with negative DSE, 5 had angina and 5 (one with angina) showed ECG changes. In 7 patients (7 segments) (32%), the location of dobutamine-induced wall motion abnormalities coincided with the area where exercise-induced hypoperfusion was observed with MIBI.

CONCLUSIONS

More than a half of syndrome X patients with myocardial perfusion abnormalities also develop regional LV dysfunction during DSE. However, the site of perfusion defects and wall motion abnormalities can be different. Reversible ischemia, defined as a parallel limitation of flow reserve and inducible dysfunction, could be identified as the cause of chest pain in almost one-third of patients.

Impaired baroreflex sensitivity and sympathovagal balance in syndrome X

Alterations of autonomic nervous control of cardiac function have been described in syndrome X. The characteristics, however, of the autonomic control of the cardiovascular system in patients with syndrome X have not been adequately studied; thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the role of baroreceptor sensitivity and sympathovagal balance in syndrome X. The study group included 12 patients with syndrome X, 12 age- and sex-matched control patients with coronary artery disease, and 12 age- and sex-matched controls with no evidence of heart disease. Baroreceptor sensitivity was evaluated by calculating the regression line relating phenylephrine-induced increases in systolic blood pressure to the attendant changes in the RR interval. Sympathovagal balance was assessed by using heart rate variability in the time and frequency domain and measuring plasma norepinephrine at rest and during incremental bicycle exercise. Baroreceptor sensitivity was significantly reduced in syndrome X compared with that in control normal subjects (7.4 +/- 1.2 vs 16.8 +/- 2.3 ms/mm Hg; p < 0.02). This was associated with a significantly lower percentage of adjacent normal RR intervals that differ by >50 ms, lower root-mean-square of the difference of adjacent RR intervals, and lower logarithmic value of the high-frequency component in patients with syndrome X compared with normal subjects. A nonsignificant trend toward lower baroreceptor sensitivity was found in patients with syndrome X compared with control ischemic patients (7.4 +/- 2 vs 12.2 +/- 1.3 ms/mm Hg). A nonsignificant trend toward a higher value of the low- to high-frequency ratio was also observed in patients with syndrome X than in both control groups. No difference was detected in norepinephrine levels either at rest or during exercise or in the exercise-induced norepinephrine increase between the 3 groups. No difference was also observed between ischemic patients and normal subjects in either baroreceptor sensitivity or heart rate variability measurements. A significant correlation (r = 0.80, p < 0.01) was found between baroreceptor sensitivity and the high-frequency component in normal controls but not for other measurements of autonomic function in the 3 groups. In conclusion, patients with syndrome X have an altered autonomic control of the cardiovascular system characterized by impaired baroreceptor sensitivity and reduced heart rate variability. Abnormal autonomic regulation of the cardiovascular system may be of pathophysiologic importance in syndrome X.

[Prevention of cardiovascular risk in menopause women: role of ovarian hormones]

Women receiving estrogen replacement therapy after menopause have a reduced risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular mortality when compared to untreated controls. Estrogens are thought to protect women primarily through an effect on lipid metabolism. However estrogen-induced increase of HDL-cholesterol and decrease of total and LDL-cholesterol appear to account only in part for the protective effect of ovarian hormones. Direct effects of estrogens on the arterial wall appear to contribute to the over-all cardiovascular benefits.

Short-term anti-ischemic effect of 17beta-estradiol in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Short-term administration of 17beta-estradiol improves effort-induced myocardial ischemia in female patients with coronary artery disease. 17Beta-estradiol also has direct and indirect coronary vascular smooth muscle relaxing properties. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of short-term administration of 17beta-estradiol on pacing-induced myocardial ischemia by means of continuous monitoring of coronary sinus pH in 16 postmenopausal female patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients underwent incremental atrial pacing starting at a rate of 100 bpm and increments of 20 bpm every 2 minutes up to 160 bpm before and 20 minutes after either 17beta-estradiol (1 mg sublingual, 9 patients) or placebo (sublingual, 7 patients). The time to the onset of myocardial ischemia during pacing was significantly increased by 17beta-estradiol (mean+/-SD, 254+/-36 versus 298+/-23 seconds; P<.02) but not by placebo (262+/-45 versus 256+/-34 seconds; P=NS) The pH shift was significantly reduced by 17beta-estradiol but not by placebo at every step of the pacing protocol. The maximum pH shift at peak pacing was significantly reduced by the administration of 17beta-estradiol by 0.022 pH units (95% CI, 0.001, 0.043; P<.04) but not by sublingual placebo (-0.002 pH units; 95% CI, -0.0073, 0.0021; P=NS). The maximum pH shift at maximum comparable pacing was also reduced by 17beta-estradiol by 0.015 pH units (95% CI, 0.012, 0.017; P<.001) but not by placebo (-0.0022 pH units; 95% CI, -0.006, 0.0015; P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

17Beta-estradiol reduces the degree of pacing-induced myocardial ischemia in postmenopausal patients with coronary artery disease. The reduction of pacing-induced coronary sinus pH shift is consistent with an anti-ischemic effect of the hormone and is not due to preconditioning, as evidenced by the absence of improvement after placebo.

Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on heart rate variability and heart rate in healthy postmenopausal women

Increased sympathetic drive in symptomatic menopausal women was reduced after estrogen replacement therapy for 4 months, which has a potentially beneficial effect on cardiovascular functions.

Effect of atenolol on QT interval and dispersion in patients with syndrome X

Atenolol reduces QT dispersion and corrected QT interval in patients with syndrome X. This suggests that symptomatic improvement induced by atenolol in syndrome X patients may be partly related to reduction in abnormally augmented sympathetic tone.

Effect of acute administration of estradiol 17 beta on aortic blood flow in menopausal women

Acute administration of estradiol 17beta increases aortic blood flow velocity in menopausal women. This suggests that the effect of the ovarian hormone on cardiac dynamics is mainly dependent on a reduction in peripheral vascular resistances.

Palpitations: what is the mechanism, and when should we treat them?

Palpitation is an unpleasant awareness of an abnormal beating of the heart. This symptom may be brought on by a variety of cardiac disorders, such as cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, and coronary artery disease, but the most common cause is primary cardiac arrhythmias. Several noncardiac disorders may also cause palpitations, and in this case are an effect of the disease upon cardiac rhythm. Palpitations occur frequently in women at all ages, especially during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, during pregnancy, and during the perimenopausal period. Palpitations occurring at young age and associated with fast heart rate are frequently due to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome or other forms of re-entrant tachycardia, and may require catheter ablation. A correlation between ovarian hormones and occurrence of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia has recently been reported in female patients with normal menstrual cycles; palpitations are frequently reported in cases of mitral valve prolapse, whereas episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia reported during pregnancy may be due to mechanical stimuli or to a suggested arrhythmogenic effect of pregnancy. Palpitations during the perimenopausal period are usually benign and seem to be related to the increased sympathetic activity caused by the menopause. Although the vast majority of palpitations are benign and need not be treated, an electrophysiological study is indicated for those patients who have a documented episode of palpitation associated with syncope or with a pulse that is inappropriately rapid during symptoms. The treatment of palpitations due to cardiac arrhythmias is dependent upon the kind of arrhythmia detected during either invasive or noninvasive electrophysiological studies.

17-beta-Estradiol therapy lessens angina in postmenopausal women with syndrome X

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the hypothesis that estrogen replacement therapy ameliorates symptoms in postmenopausal women with syndrome X.

BACKGROUND

Syndrome X (angina pectoris, positive findings on exercise electrocardiography and normal results on coronary angiography) frequently occurs in menopausal women. This observation, in conjunction with the known vasoactive properties of estrogens, suggests that estrogen depletion may contribute to the pathogenesis of syndrome X in some women.

METHODS

Twenty-five postmenopausal patients with syndrome X completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effect of 17-beta-estradiol cutaneous patches (100 micrograms/24 h) on the frequency of chest pain and on exercise tolerance. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or 17-beta-estradiol patches for 8 weeks and were then crossed over to the other treatment.

RESULTS

During the placebo phase, patients had a mean of 7.3 episodes of chest pain/10 days. A reduction to 3.7 episodes/10 days was observed during the 17-beta-estradiol phase (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the effects of 17-beta-estradiol and placebo on exercise duration or the results of other cardiologic investigations.

CONCLUSIONS

Estrogen replacement reduces the frequency of chest pain and may be a useful new therapeutic option for treating postmenopausal women with syndrome X.