Statins and influenza mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Due to their anti-inflammatory properties, it has been suggested that the use of statins could influence the evolution of influenza virus infection.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of statin therapy on mortality from influenza.

Material and methods

A meta-analysis that included studies evaluating the use of statins in patients with influenza and reporting data on mortality, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases, was performed. A random effects model was applied. The risk of bias was analyzed and a sensitivity analysis was performed.

Results

Eight studies (10 independent cohorts), which included a total of 2,390,730 patients, were identified and eligible for analysis. A total of 1,146,995 subjects analyzed received statins, while 1,243,735 subjects were part of the control group. Statin therapy was associated with lower mortality (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.51–0.85). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that, in a population with influenza, the use of statins was associated with a significant reduction in mortality. These results must be confirmed in future clinical trials.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Sleeve Gastrectomy on Lipid Levels in Type 2 Diabetes: a Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Obesity and its co-morbidities, including type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and dyslipidemia, are accompanied by excess cardiovascular morbi-mortality. Aside from excess low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), atherogenic dyslipidemia (AD), mainly characterized by elevated triglycerides and decreased high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, is often present in T2DM obese patients. Bariatric surgery, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG), has become a reference treatment in that population. However, the respective effects of RYGB vs SG on lipid metabolism in T2DM patients have been rarely studied.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, comparing the effects of RGYBG vs SG on lipid metabolism 12 months after surgery in T2DM patients, was performed.

RESULTS

Four studies including a total of 298 patients (151 patients in the RYGB and 147 patients in the SG group) were examined. Despite a greater decrease in body mass index and greater improvement in glycemic control in RYGB compared to SG. RYGB vs SG was more effective in reducing total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C levels (mean difference [MD] -26.10 mg/dL, 95 % CI -38.88 to -13.50, p<0.00001; [MD] -20.10 mg/dL, 95 % CI -27.90 to -12.20, p<0.00001 and MD 31.90 mg/dl, 95 % CI -46.90 to -16.80, p<0.00001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The superiority of RYGB vs SG in reducing LDL-C, with an effect comparable to a moderate-intensity statin, suggests RYBG should be favored in hypercholesterolemic T2DM patients in order to further reduce cardiovascular risk.

Elevated lipoprotein (a) levels and risk of peripheral artery disease outcomes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite strong association of elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) levels with incident coronary and cerebrovascular disease, data for incident peripheral artery disease (PAD) are less robust. The main objective of the present systematic review was to analyze the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and PAD outcomes.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was performed to detect randomized clinical trials or observational studies with a cohort design that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and PAD outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies including 493,650 subjects were identified and considered eligible for this systematic review. This systematic review showed that the vast majority of the studies reported a significant association between elevated Lp(a) levels and the risk of PAD outcomes. The elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with a higher risk of incident claudication (RR: 1.20), PAD progression (HR: 1.41), restenosis (HR: 6.10), death and hospitalization related to PAD (HR: 1.37), limb amputation (HR: 22.75), and lower limb revascularization (HR: 1.29 and 2.90). In addition, the presence of elevated Lp(a) values were associated with a higher risk of combined PAD outcomes, with HRs in a range between 1.14 and 2.80, despite adjusting for traditional risk factors. Heterogeneity of results can be explained by different patient populations studied and varying Lp(a) cut-off points of Lp(a) analyzed.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review suggests that evidence is available to support an independent positive association between Lp(a) levels and the risk of future PAD outcomes. PROSPERO Registration No.: 289253.

Prognostic Role of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Several studies have evaluated the relation between variables of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and major clinical events in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients, although the results were conflicting. The main objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the CPET derived parameters on all-cause mortality or urgent transplantation in PH patients. Material and Methods: A meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes were performed from observational studies that evaluated the predictive value of CEPT-related variables [peak oxygen uptake (VO₂) and the ventilation to CO₂ production slope (VE/VCO₂)] in PH patients, reporting data from mortality or urgent transplantation, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. A random-effects meta-analysis model was then applied. Results: Nine eligible studies, including 986 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the quantitative analyses. This meta-analysis showed that high peak VO₂ was associated with a lower mortality or transplant occurrence (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.78–0.85, I2 = 29%). In addition, high VE/VCO₂ slope was associated with a higher incidence of the primary endpoint (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, I2 = 78%). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Conclusions: Our data suggest that in a population with PH the CPET-related variables have predictive capacity regarding mortality and the risk of transplantation. Future studies should establish the best cut-off points for these CPET-related variables.

Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardioprotective Benefit in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Without Baseline Metformin: A Systematic Review and Update Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Sodium Glucose Co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular disease events in cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) in type 2 diabetes. Most of the patients included in these trials received metformin as background therapy.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists on major cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality in metformin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials of GLP-1RAs on type 2 diabetes population was performed, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scielo, Google Scholar and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. The primary endpoint was MACE. The secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality. A meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes was performed. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021260040) RESULTS: Seven trials, including 11510 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. GLP-1RAs were associated with a significant reduction in MACE incidence (HR: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.79-0.94; I²: 0%). The secondary endpoints analysis showed a non-significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.00 I²: 0%) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.63-1.05; I²: 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, GLP-1RAs reduced the incidence of MACE in patients with type 2 diabetes without metformin at baseline, without significant reduction in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. These results support the fact that when a GLP-1RAs is administered, the benefit on cardiovascular outcomes is independent of the use of metformin.

Role of statins in patients with MINOCA. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Given the complex etiology and a limited amount of evidence, the medical treatment (including statin use) of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) remains uncertain. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on major cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality in MINOCA patients.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes were performed from statin's studies therapy on MINOCA patients, reporting data from MACE or mortality, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases.

The Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies (MOOSE) and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used to check the reporting of observational studies. The quality of the included studies was assessed by two independent review authors using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The summary effect of statin therapy on the endpoints were calculated. Measures of effect size were expressed as HRs, and the I2 statistic was calculated to quantify between-studies heterogeneity and inconsistency. A fixed-effects meta-analysis model and sensitivity analysis was then applied. The level of statistical significance was set at a 2-tailed alpha of 0.05.

Results

Six observational studies of statin therapy on MINOCA, involving a total of 11171 patients, were identified and considered eligible for analysis (9129 subjects received statin therapy while 2042 patients were part of the respective control arms). Quantitative analysis (5 studies were included) showed that statin use was associated with lower mortality (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.56–0.75, I2: 0%). Also, the meta-analysis showed that statin therapy was associated with a lower incidence of MACE (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69–0.88, I2: 27%).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that in a population with MINOCA, the use of statin therapy results in significant reduction on MACE and mortality. These results must be confirmed in future clinical trials.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Mortality and MACESensitivity analysis

Effects of lipid-lowering therapy on major adverse limb events in patients with peripheral arterial disease: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at increased risk of major adverse limb events (MALE). Furthermore, MALE have several clinical implications and a poor prognosis, so prevention is a fundamental issue. The main objective of the present meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials is to evaluate the effect of different lipid-lowering therapies on MALE incidence in patients with PAD.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized studies that evaluated the use of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with PAD and reported MALE was performed, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, ScieLO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. A fixed- or random-effects model was used.

RESULTS

Five randomized clinical trials including 11,603 patients were identified and considered eligible for the analyses (5903 subjects were allocated to receive lipid-lowering therapy, while 5700 subjects were allocated to the respective placebo/control arms). The present meta-analysis revealed that lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a lower incidence of MALE (OR: 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.87; I2: 28%) compared to placebo/control groups. The sensitivity analysis shows that the results are robust.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the use of lipid-lowering therapy compared with the placebo/control arms was associated with a marked reduction in the risk of MALE. Physicians involved in the monitoring and treatment of patients with PAD must work hard to ensure adequate lipid-lowering medication in these patients.

Aspirin in primary prevention. Meta-analysis stratified by baseline cardiovascular risk

Introducción

La utilidad de la aspirina en la prevención primaria es todavía objeto de controversia. Los avances médicos y la variabilidad del riesgo cardiovascular podrían explicar la heterogeneidad de los estudios publicados, y las poblaciones de alto riesgo tendrían mayor beneficio.

Objetivo

Analizar los efectos de la aspirina en pacientes sin antecedentes cardiovasculares y evaluar los resultados de acuerdo con el riesgo cardiovascular de las poblaciones.

Métodos

Se incluyeron estudios que evaluaron el uso de la aspirina en comparación con placebo en la prevención primaria. Se analizó la combinación de muerte cardiovascular, infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM) y accidente cerebrovascular (ACV) isquémico. El punto final de seguridad fue la combinación de ACV hemorrágico y sangrado mayor. Se clasificaron los estudios en riesgo bajo y moderado/ alto, de acuerdo con el número de episodios en la rama de placebo.

Resultados

Se evaluaron 13 estudios (n = 164,225), ocho de riesgo cardiovascular bajo (n = 118,455) y cinco de moderado/alto (n = 45,770). Se observó una reducción del punto final combinado en el grupo de aspirina (OR 0.90; IC 95%, 0.85-0.94), sin diferencias en mortalidad cardiovascular (OR 0.94; IC 95%, 0.86-1.04). No se identificaron diferencias entre los subgrupos de riesgo. Se reconocieron mayores complicaciones hemorrágicas en el grupo de aspirina (OR 1.45; IC 95%, 1.32-1.60), sin diferencias entre los subgrupos de riesgo.

Conclusión

La aspirina se relacionó con una leve disminución de IAM y ACV isquémico en términos absolutos, sin diferencias en la mortalidad cardiovascular. Esto, junto con el aumento de las complicaciones hemorrágicas, se traduce en una ausencia de beneficio clínico neto. El riesgo cardiovascular basal de la población no modificó los resultados.

Background

The usefulness of aspirin in primary prevention continues to be the subject of debate. Medical advances and the variability of cardiovascular risk could explain the heterogeneity of the published studies. High risk populations would have greater benefit.

Objective

Analyzing the effects of aspirin in patients without cardiovascular disease and evaluating the results according to the cardiovascular risk of the populations.

Methods

Studies evaluating aspirin versus placebo in primary prevention were included. The primary endpoint was the combined cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ischemic stroke. The final safety point was the combination of hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding. The studies were classified into low and moderate/high risk, according to the number of events in the placebo arm.

Results

Thirteen studies were evaluated (n = 164,225), eight of low cardiovascular risk (n = 118,455) and five of moderate/high risk (n = 45,770). There was a reduction of the combined endpoint in the aspirin group (odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.94), without differences in cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.04). No differences were observed when comparing the risk subgroups. Greater hemorrhagic complications were observed in the aspirin group (OR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.32-1.60), without differences between the risk subgroups.

Conclusion

Aspirin was associated with a slight decrease in AMI and ischemic stroke in absolute terms, with no differences in cardiovascular mortality. This accompanied by the increase in hemorrhagic complications, results in an absence of net clinical benefit. The baseline cardiovascular risk of the population did not affect the results.

Prognostic value of statin therapy in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the complex aetiology and a limited amount of evidence, the medical treatment (including statin use) of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) remains uncertain. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on major cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality in MINOCA patients.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes were performed of studies of statin therapy on MINOCA patients, reporting data from MACE or mortality, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. A fixed-effects meta-analysis model was then applied.

RESULTS

Six observational studies of statin therapy on MINOCA, involving a total of 11,171 patients, were identified and considered eligible for analysis (9129 subjects received statin therapy while 2042 patients were part of the respective control arms). Quantitative analysis (5 studies were included) showed that statin use was associated with lower mortality (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.56-0.75, I²: 0%). Also, the meta-analysis showed that statin therapy was associated with a lower incidence of MACE (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69-0.88, I²:27%).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that in a population with MINOCA, the use of statin therapy results in significant reduction on MACE and mortality. These results must be confirmed in future clinical trials.

Effect of anti-inflammatory therapy on major cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with coronary artery disease anti-inflammatory drugs have been shown to be effective in reducing cardiovascular events. The effect of this intervention in the population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is poorly explored. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of anti-inflammatory therapy on the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of randomized studies that evaluated the use of anti-inflammatory therapy in patients with T2DM and reported MACE was performed, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scielo, Google Scholar and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. A fixed or random effects models were used.

RESULTS

Five studies were selected for the analysis (2075 subjects in the anti-inflammatory therapy arm and 2490 patients in the placebo/control arm). All studies included patients with T2DM and history of coronary artery disease. Four studies evaluated the use of colchicine and one of them canakinumab. The use of anti-inflammatory therapy was associated with a lower risk of MACE (HR: 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; I² = 24%). The sensitivity analysis shows that the results are robust.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of anti-inflammatory therapy in patients with T2DM and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was associated with reduced risk of MACE. These results suggest the need to consider the inflammatory pathway as a potential therapeutic target in patients with T2DM.

Statin use in patients with elevated serum hepatic transaminases at baseline: A meta-analysis

AIMS

Clinical trials showed that statin therapy decreased cardiovascular events without significantly raising the level of transaminases. However, the information in subjects with altered liver test at baseline is more limited. The objectives of this meta-analysis were to analyze the liver safety and cardiovascular benefit when using a statin-based lipid-lowering treatment compared to a less intensive treatment or placebo, in subjects with abnormal liver tests at baseline.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We performed a meta-analysis including randomized trials of statin-based lipid-lowering therapy versus less intensive lipid-lowering therapy or placebo, reporting worsening hepatic test (>3 ULN) and cardiovascular events in patients with abnormal liver tests at baseline. The random-effects model was performed. This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Five eligible trials, including 2548 patients were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. A more intensive statin-based lipid-lowering therapy were associated with a similar occurrence of serious alteration of liver tests (OR: 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.21-3.99; I²: 64%) compared to less intensive or placebo treatments. Likewise, more intensive lipid-lowering strategies were associated with a significant reduction in major cardiovascular events (OR: 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.70; I²: 66%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a more intensive statin-based lipid-lowering treatment, compared with less intensive treatment or placebo, showed a similar incidence of worsening transaminases levels in patients with abnormal liver tests at baseline. Also, a reduction in cardiovascular events was observed when a more intensive lipid-lowering therapy was used.

Effect of Bempedoic Acid on atherogenic lipids and inflammation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bempedoic acid is a novel non-statin drug that was developed to treat hyperlipidemia in combination with other lipid-lowering drugs in those patients who need additional lipid lowering.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To investigate the lipid efficacy of bempedoic acid; (2) to analyze the anti-inflammatory effects of bempedoic acid estimated through high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis including randomized trials of bempedoic acid therapy, reporting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B and hsCRP with a minimum of 4 weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was defined as the percentage change in lipids and hsCRP levels measured from baseline to follow-up, comparing groups of subjects on bempedoic acid versus placebo.

RESULTS

Seven eligible trials of bempedoic acid (3892 patients) were included. The bempedoic acid therapy was associated with a significant reduction in LDL-C levels [-20.3% (CI 95% -23.5 to -17.1)]; I²=43%]. Similarly, a significant percentage reduction in the apolipoprotein B levels [-14.3% (CI 95% -16.4 to -12.1)]; p<0.05; I²=46%], non-HDL-C levels [-15.5% (CI 95% -18.1 to -13.0)]; p<0.05; I²=53%] and hsCRP [-23.4% (CI 95% -32.6 to -14.2)]; p<0.05; I²=69%] was demonstrated with the bempedoic acid use. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that the use of bempedoic acid significantly reduces the levels of all atherogenic lipid markers, including LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B. Furthermore, considering hsCRP levels, the drug produces an anti-inflammatory effect.

LDL-C Levels Below 55 mg/dl and Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of very low levels of LDL-C (< 55 mg/dl) achieved with lipid-lowering therapy on hemorrhagic stroke incidence.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis including randomized trials that achieved LDL-C levels under 55 mg/dl in more intensive lipid-lowering arms, regardless of the lipid-lowering drug used. A fixed-effects model was used. This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight eligible trials including 122.802 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. A total of 62.526 subjects were allocated to receive more intensive lipid-lowering therapy while 60.276 subjects were allocated to the respective control arms. There were no differences in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke between the group that received a more intensive lipid-lowering therapy (achieved LDL-C level <55 mg/dl), and the group that received a less intense scheme (OR, 1.05; 95%CI, 0.85-1.31). The statistical heterogeneity was low (I2 = 2%). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of more intensive lipid-lowering therapy that achieved an LDL-C level lower than 55 mg/dl in patients with high cardiovascular risk, is not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Considering the cardiovascular benefit and safety observed with the achievement of very low LDL-C values, the challenging lipid goals recommended by the new guidelines seem consistent.

Non-statin lipid-lowering therapy in coronary atherosclerosis regression: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

Introduction

Several studies have investigated the association between non-statin lipid-lowering therapy and regression of atherosclerosis. However, the studies were mostly small and their results were not always robust.

Objectives

(1) to define if a dual lipid-lowering therapy (statin ± non-statin drugs) is associated with coronary atherosclerosis regression, estimated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS); (2) to assess the association between dual lipid-lowering-induced changes in LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels and atherosclerosis regression.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis including trials of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy, reporting C-LDL, non-HDL-C and total atheroma volume (TAV) with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. The primary endpoint was defined as the change in TAV measured from baseline to follow-up, comparing groups of subjects on statins alone versus combination of statin and non-statin drugs. The random-effects model and meta-regression were performed.

Results

Eight eligible trials of non-statin lipid-lowering drugs (1759 patients) were included. Overall, the dual lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a significant reduction in TAV [−3.5 mm3 (95% CI: −4.5 to −2.6)]; I2=11%]. In the analysis stratified according to the lipid-lowering drug class (ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors), the findings were similar. In a meta-regression, a 10% decrease in LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels, was associated, respectively, with 0.92 mm3 and 1.05 mm3 regressions in TAV.

Conclusion

Our data suggest the addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors to statin therapy results in significantly increased regression of TAV. When the LDL-C and non-HDL-C levels reached were lower, the observed effect was also greater.

Forest Plot by Drugs Group

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Role of colchicine in stroke prevention: an updated meta-analysis

Background

Colchicine is a microtubule inhibitor with anti-inflammatory proprieties. As the body and quality of evidence regarding the efficacy of colchicine for cardiovascular prevention is controversial, the aims of this study was to evaluate the effect of colchicine therapy on vascular events.

Methods

A meta-analysis was performed of randomized controlled clinical trials of colchicine on high cardiovascular risk populations, reporting data from stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. A random-effects meta-analysis model was then applied.

Results

Nine eligible trials of colchicine therapy, involving a total of 6630 patients, were considered eligible for analysis (3359 subjects were allocated to receive colchicine while 3271 subjects were allocated to the respective control arms). The stroke incidence was lower in the colchicine group compared with placebo arm (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15–0.70; six studies evaluated). We did not find a significant reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality or all-cause mortality.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that in a population with high cardiovascular risk, the use of colchicine results in significantly reduction on stroke risk. Colchicine is an accessible drug that could be successfully utilized for the prevention of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease. The tolerability and benefits should be confirmed in ongoing clinical trials.

Forest Plot Primary endpoint

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Effect of bempedoic acid on new onset or worsening diabetes: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Bempedoic acid is a new agent that reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Since inhibits cholesterol synthesis through a different mechanism than statins, the adverse effects related to it may also be different. Therefore, the objective of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of bempedoic acid on new onset or worsening diabetes.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis including randomized trials of bempedoic acid therapy, reporting new onset or worsening diabetes with a minimum of 4 weeks of follow-up. The fixed-effects model was performed. This meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Five eligible trials of bempedoic acid, including 3629 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. A total of 2419 subjects were allocated to receive bempedoic acid while 1210 subjects were allocated to the respective control arms. Bempedoic acid therapy is associated with a significant reduction in new onset or worsening diabetes [Odds Ratio: 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.90; I2: 0%].

CONCLUSION

This data suggests that the use of bempedoic acid significantly reduces the new onset or worsening diabetes risk. This finding should be confirmed with future studies.

Novel antidiabetic drugs and risk of cardiovascular events in patients without baseline metformin use: a meta-analysis

AIMS

To evaluate the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on major cardiovascular events (MACE) in metformin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A meta-analysis was performed of randomized controlled clinical trials of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors on T2D populations, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. The primary endpoint was MACE. The secondary endpoint, explored in the subgroup of SGLT-2 inhibitors studies, was cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. A random-effects meta-analysis model was applied. Six eligible trials (three studies of SGLT-2 inhibitors and three trials of GLP-1RAs), including 13 049 patients, were identified and considered eligible for the analyses. The new antidiabetic drugs were associated with a significant reduction in MACE [odds ratio (OR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.93; I2: 53%]. The subgroup analysis showed the following findings: GLP-1RAs group, OR: 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.67-0.88); SGLT-2 inhibitors, OR: 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.63-1.15). SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a significant reduction in hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular mortality incidence (OR: 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.95; I2: 78%).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, new antidiabetic drugs reduced the incidence of MACE in metformin-naïve T2D patients. The beneficial effect was especially observed in the GLP-1RAs subgroup. The use of SGLT-2 inhibitors was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure. These results support the fact that metformin would not be indispensable to obtain positive cardiovascular effects when new antidiabetic drugs are administered.

Role of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy in coronary atherosclerosis regression: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Several studies have investigated the association between non-statin lipid-lowering therapy and regression of atherosclerosis. However, these studies were mostly small and their results were not always robust. The objectives were: (1) to define if a dual lipid-lowering therapy (statin + non-statin drugs) is associated with coronary atherosclerosis regression, estimated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS); (2) to assess the association between dual lipid-lowering-induced changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels and atherosclerosis regression.

METHODS

A meta-analysis including trials of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy, reporting LDL-C, non-HDL-C and total atheroma volume (TAV) with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up was performed. The primary endpoint was defined as the change in TAV measured from baseline to follow-up, comparing groups of subjects on statins alone versus combination of statin and non-statin drugs. The random-effects model and meta-regression were performed.

RESULTS

Eight eligible trials of non-statin lipid-lowering drugs (1759 patients) were included. Overall, the dual lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a significant reduction in TAV [- 4.0 mm³ (CI 95% -5.4 to - 2.6)]; I² = 0%]. The findings were similar in the stratified analysis according to the lipid-lowering drug class (ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors). In the meta-regression, a 10% decrease in LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels, was associated, respectively, with 1.0 mm³ and 1.1 mm³ regressions in TAV.

CONCLUSION

These data suggests the addition of ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors to statin therapy results in a significant regression of TAV. Reduction of coronary atherosclerosis observed with non-statin lipid-lowering therapy is associated to the degree of LDL-C and non-HDL-C lowering. Therefore, it seems reasonable to achieve lipid goals according to cardiovascular risk and regardless of the lipid-lowering strategy used (statin monotherapy or dual treatment).

Psoriasis and Cardiovascular Risk: A Comprehensive Review

Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disorder that involves complex pathogenic interactions between the innate and adaptive immune systems. Individuals with psoriasis have an increased risk of developing other chronic health diseases such cardiovascular disorders. The high incidence of cardiovascular events in the population with psoriasis could be explained by several mechanisms. The high prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic abnormalities contributes to the high cardiovascular burden in patients with psoriasis. Likewise, the presence of systemic inflammation in combination with metabolic abnormalities may act in a synergistic manner to increase cardiovascular risk in these patients. This review focused on epidemiologic and clinical evidence linking psoriasis to cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease. We described the possible pathophysiological mechanisms that justify this association and analyzed the best way to stratify the cardiovascular risk in patients with psoriasis. We also described the usefulness of the therapies frequently used in cardiovascular prevention and analyzed the impact of the specific psoriasis medication on cardiovascular risk factors or major atherosclerotic events. Knowledge of the application of different cardiovascular prevention strategies could mean an advantage in performing the difficult task of estimating cardiovascular risk and treating cardiovascular risk factors in this particular group of patients.

P667Aspirin in primary prevention. Risks and benefits. Up date 2019. A meta-analysis

Objectives

1. Perform an updated meta-analysis on the use of aspirin in primary cardiovascular prevention. 2. Analyze the results by risk.

Methods

This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, AMI, and ischemic stroke. The measures of effect size are expressed as odds ratios. The level of statistical significance was established at 0.05.

Characteristics of the studies Trials Year N Follow-up Risk RTPDABMD 1988 5,139 5.5 Middle PHS 1989 22,071 5 Low HOT 1998 18,790 3.8 Middle TPT 1998 5,085 6.7 Middle PPP 2001 44,95 3.6 Low WHS 2005 39,876 10.1 Low JPAD 2008 2,539 4.4 Low POPADAD 2008 1276 6.7 High AAA 2010 3,350 8.2 Low JPPP 2014 14,464 5 Low ASCEND 2018 15,480 7.4 Middle ARRIVE 2018 12,546 5 Low ASPREE 2018 19,114 4.7 Low RTPDABMD, Randomised trial of prophylactic daily aspirin in British male doctors; PHS, Physicians' Health Study; HOT, Hypertension Optimal Treatment; TPT, Thrombosis Prevention Trial; PPP, Primary Prevention Project; WHS, Women's Health Study; JPAD, Japanese Primary Prevention of Atherosclerosis With Aspirin for Diabetes; POPADAD, Prevention of Progression of Arterial Disease and Diabetes; AAA, Aspirin for Asymptomatic Atherosclerosis; JPPP, Japanese Primary Prevention Project; ASCEND, A Study of Cardiovascular Events in Diabetes; ARRIVE, Aspirin to Reduce Risk of Initial Vascular Events; ASPREE, Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly.

Figure 1

Results

Thirteen works were considered for the analysis (Table 1). A total of 164,225 patients were included, 82,900 in the aspirin arm and 81,325 in the control group. A reduction of the primary endpoint was observed in the AAS group (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85–0.94). No differences by risk group (Figure 1). Risk of severe bleeding was significantly higher in patients treated with ASA (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.34–1.56), this difference was maintained by risk (Figure 1).

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

Association between non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and carotid atherosclerosis in postmenopausal middle-aged women

Background: A novel lipid relation, the non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C/HDL-C) ratio gathers information on all atherogenic and antiatherogenic particles on a single date. The relationship between this lipid marker and the presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) in postmenopausal women is unknown. Methods: Postmenopausal women in primary prevention up to 70 years of age were recruited. Association between the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and presence of CAP, assessed by ultrasonography, was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. Results: A total of 440 females with a mean age of 58.1 ± 5.3 years were recruited. The mean non-HDL-C/HDL ratio was 3.1 ± 1.2 and 28.2% of woman had CAP. A positive relationship was seen between quintiles of the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and prevalence of CAP (p < 0.001). Regardless of other risk factors, women with higher non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratios had a greater chance of having CAP (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.58, p = 0.009). In the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve of the non-HDL-C/HDL ratio for detecting CAP was 0.703 (95% confidence interval: 0.640-0.765) and the optimal cut-off point was 3.0 (Youden index 0.395). Conclusion: The present study suggests that the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio might be a strong marker for predicting the risk of CAP in postmenopausal women.

Plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors and cataract risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The marked decrease in LDL-C levels produced by the inhibitors of the plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (iPCSK9) could be associated with an increased risk of cataracts.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed that included randomised clinical trials controlled with iPCSK9, alone, or in combination with other lipid-lowering drugs, which reported new cases of cataracts, by searching PubMed/Medline, databases of EMBASE and Cochrane Clinical Trials. A fixed-effect model was used, and a meta-regression was carried out evaluating the relationship between intra-treatment LDL-C and the risk of developing cataracts.

RESULTS

Five eligible studies of iPCSK9 including 83,492 patients were taken into account for the analysis, and 531 new cases of cataracts in iPCSK9 group vs. 532 in placebo group were diagnosed. The iPCSK9 therapy was not associated with an increased risk of cataracts [OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85-1.08; P=.86, I²: 0%]. Likewise, no significant association was found between on-treatment LDL-C levels, differences between study arms, and new cases of cataracts.

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, the use of iPCSK9 was not associated with an increased risk of cataracts.

Therapy with cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors and diabetes risk

BACKGROUND

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors are a class of drugs that targets the CETP enzyme to significantly increase serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. As HDL-C has potential antidiabetic properties, and the beneficial effects of CETP drugs on glucose homoeostasis have not been sufficiently studied, the aims of this study were: (1) to evaluate the effect of CETP inhibitors on the incidence of diabetes; and (2) to assess the association between CETP inhibitor-induced changes in HDL-C levels and incidence of diabetes.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed of randomized controlled clinical trials of CETP inhibitor therapy, either alone or combined with other lipid-lowering drugs, reporting data from new cases of diabetes with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, after searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Trials databases. A fixed-effects meta-regression model was then applied.

RESULTS

Four eligible trials of CETP inhibitors, involving a total of 73,479 patients, were considered for the analyses, including 960 newly diagnosed cases of diabetes in the CTEP inhibitor group vs 1086 in the placebo group. CETP inhibitor therapy was associated with a significant 12% reduction in incidence of diabetes (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96; P=0.005). Assessment of the relationship between on-treatment HDL-C and the effect of CETP inhibitors showed a statistically non-significant trend (Z=-1.13, P=0.26).

CONCLUSION

CETP inhibitors reduced the incidence of diabetes. The improvement in glucose metabolism may have been related, at least in part, to the increase in HDL-C concentration.

Lipid discordance and carotid plaque in obese patients in primary prevention

INTRODUCTION

Obese patients with lipid discordance (non-HDL cholesterol levels 30mg/dL above the LDL-c value) may have a greater prevalence of carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP). Our study objectives were: 1) To assess the prevalence of lipid discordance in a primary prevention population of obese patients; 2) To investigate the association between lipid discordance and presence of CAP.

METHODS

Obese subjects aged >18 years (BMI ≥30kg/m²) with no cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or lipid-lowering treatment from six cardiology centers were included. Lipid discordance was defined when, regardless of the LDL-c level, the non-HDL cholesterol value exceeded the LDL-c value by 30mg/dL. Presence of CAP was identified by ultrasonography. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the association between lipid discordance and presence of CAP.

RESULTS

The study simple consisted of 325 obese patients (57.2% men; mean age, 52.3 years). Prevalence of lipid discordance was 57.9%. CAP was found in 38.6% of patients, but the proportion was higher in subjects with lipid discordance as compared to those without this lipid pattern (44.4% vs. 30.7%, P=.01). In both the univariate (OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.14-2.87; P=.01) and the multivariate analysis (OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.22-3.54; P=.007), presence of lipid discordance was associated to an increased probability of CAP.

CONCLUSION

In these obese patients, lipid discordance was associated to greater prevalence of CAP. Evaluation of obese patients with this strategy could help identify subjects with higher residual cardiovascular risk.

Discordant Lipid Pattern and Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque. Importance of Remnant Cholesterol

BACKGROUND:

Subjects with levels of non-HDL-C 30 mg/dL above those of LDL-C (lipid discordance) or with high remnant cholesterol levels could have a greater residual cardiovascular risk.

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the prevalence of lipid discordance in a primary prevention population and analyze the clinical variables associated with it; To investigate the association between lipid discordance and remnant cholesterol with the presence of carotid plaque.

METHODS:

Primary prevention patients without diabetes or lipid-lowering therapy were included. Regardless of the LDL-C level, we define "lipid discordance" if the non-HDL-C value exceeded 30 mg/dL that of LDL-C. Remnant cholesterol was calculated as total cholesterol minus HDL-C minus LDL-C when triglycerides were < 4.0 mmol/L. Ultrasound was used to assess carotid plaque occurrence. Multiple regression logistic models were performed.

RESULTS:

The study included 772 patients (mean age 52 ± 11 years, 66% women). The prevalence of lipid discordance was 34%. Male sex and body mass index were independently associated with discordant lipid pattern. The prevalence of carotid plaque was higher in subjects with lipid discordance (40.2% vs. 29.2, p = 0.002). The multivariate analysis showed that the discordant lipid pattern was associated with the greater probability of carotid plaque (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.08-2.34, p = 0.02). Similarly, a significant association between calculated remnant cholesterol and carotid plaque was found.

CONCLUSION:

Lipid discordance and presence of a higher level of calculated remnant cholesterol are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. Our findings could be used to improve the residual cardiovascular risk evaluation.

FUNDAMENTO:

Indivíduos com níveis de não HDL-C excedendo em 30 mg/dl aqueles de LDL-C (discordância lipídica) ou com altos níveis de colesterol remanescente poderiam ter maior risco cardiovascular residual.

OBJETIVOS:

determinar a prevalência de discordância lipídica em uma população de prevenção primária e analisar as variáveis clínicas com ela associadas; investigar a associação de discordância lipídica e colesterol remanescente calculado com a presença de placa carotídea.

MÉTODOS:

Pacientes de prevenção primária sem diabetes ou sem terapia hipolipemiante foram incluídos. Independentemente do nível de LDL-C, definiu-se "discordância lipídica" como um valor de não HDL-C excedendo em 30 mg/dl aquele de LDL-C. Calculou-se o colesterol remanescente como colesterol total menos HDL-C menos LDL-C na presença de triglicerídeos < 4,0 mmol/l. Usou-se ultrassom para avaliar a presença de placa carotídea. Modelos de regressão logística múltipla foram construídos.

RESULTADOS:

Este estudo incluiu 772 pacientes (idade média, 52 ± 11 anos; 66% mulheres). A prevalência de discordância lipídica foi de 34%. Sexo masculino e índice de massa corporal mostraram associação independente com padrão lipídico discordante. A prevalência de placa carotídea foi maior em indivíduos com discordância lipídica (40,2% vs. 29,2; p = 0,002). A análise multivariada mostrou associação do padrão lipídico discordante com maior probabilidade de placa carotídea (OR: 1,58; IC95%: 1,08-2,34; p = 0,02). Da mesma forma, identificou-se uma significativa associação entre colesterol remanescente calculado e placa carotídea.

CONCLUSÃO:

Discordância lipídica e presença de nível mais alto de colesterol remanescente calculado acham-se associados com aterosclerose subclínica. Nossos achados podem ser usados para aprimorar a avaliação de risco cardiovascular residual.

Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome Without Diabetes or Cardiovascular Disease: Usefulness of Metabolic Syndrome Severity Score

INTRODUCTION

The estimated cardiovascular risk determined by the different risk scores, could be heterogeneous in patients with metabolic syndrome without diabetes or vascular disease. This risk stratification could be improved by detecting subclinical carotid atheromatosis.

AIMS

To estimate the cardiovascular risk measured by different scores in patients with metabolic syndrome and analyze its association with the presence of carotid plaque.

METHODS

Non-diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome (Adult Treatment Panel III definition) without cardiovascular disease were enrolled. The Framingham score, the Reynolds score, the new score proposed by the 2013 ACC/AHA Guidelines and the Metabolic Syndrome Severity Calculator were calculated. Prevalence of carotid plaque was determined by ultrasound examination. A Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients were enrolled. Most patients were stratified as "low risk" by Framingham score (64%) and Reynolds score (70.1%). Using the 2013 ACC/AHA score, 45.3% of the population had a risk ≥7.5%. A significant correlation was found between classic scores but the agreement (concordance) was moderate. The correlation between classical scores and the Metabolic Syndrome Severity Calculator was poor. Overall, the prevalence of carotid plaque was 28.2%. The continuous metabolic syndrome score used in our study showed a good predictive power to detect carotid plaque (area under the curve 0.752).

CONCLUSION

In this population, the calculated cardiovascular risk was heterogenic. The prevalence of carotid plaque was high. The Metabolic Syndrome Severity Calculator showed a good predictive power to detect carotid plaque.

Estimation of cardiovascular risk and detection of subclinical carotid atheromatosis in patients with diabetes without a history of cardiovascular disease

Objectives

Cardiovascular risk estimated by several scores in patients with diabetes mellitus without a cardiovascular disease history and the association with carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP) were the aims of this study.

Materials and methods

Cardiovascular risk was calculate using United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk engine, Framingham risk score for cardiovascular (FSCV) and coronary disease (FSCD), and the new score (NS) proposed by the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol. Ultrasound was used to assess CAP occurrence. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed.

Results

One hundred seventy patients (mean age 61.4 ± 11 years, 58.8% men) were included. Average FSCV, FSCD and NS values were 33.6% ± 21%, 20.6% ± 12% and 24.8% ± 18%, respectively. According to the UKPDS score, average risk of coronary disease and stroke were 22.1% ± 16% and 14.3% ± 19% respectively. Comparing the risks estimated by the different scores a significant correlation was found. The prevalence of CAP was 51%, in patients with the higher scores this prevalence was increased. ROC analysis showed a good discrimination power between subjects with or without CAP.

Conclusion

The cardiovascular risk estimated was high but heterogenic. The prevalence of CAP increased according to the strata of risk. Understanding the relationship between CAP and scores could improve the risk estimation in subjects with diabetes.

Association between LDL-C, Non HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B Levels with Coronary Plaque Regression

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have inferred a linear relationship between LDL-C and changes in coronary plaque volume (CPV) measured by intravascular ultrasound. However, these publications included a small number of studies and did not explore other lipid markers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between changes in lipid markers and regression of CPV using published data.

METHODS

We collected data from the control, placebo and intervention arms in studies that compared the effect of lipidlowering treatments on CPV, and from the placebo and control arms in studies that tested drugs that did not affect lipids. Baseline and final measurements of plaque volume, expressed in mm3, were extracted and the percentage changes after the interventions were calculated. Performing three linear regression analyses, we assessed the relationship between percentage and absolute changes in lipid markers and percentage variations in CPV.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were selected. Correlations between percentage changes in LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and percentage changes in CPV were moderate (r = 0.48, r = 0.47, and r = 0.44, respectively). Correlations between absolute differences in LDL-C, non‑HDL-C, and ApoB with percentage differences in CPV were stronger (r = 0.57, r = 0.52, and r = 0.79). The linear regression model showed a statistically significant association between a reduction in lipid markers and regression of plaque volume.

CONCLUSION

A significant association between changes in different atherogenic particles and regression of CPV was observed. The absolute reduction in ApoB showed the strongest correlation with coronary plaque regression.

[The role of the occupational physician in disabled return to work]

Workers, former workers or unemployed workers with disabilities of various kinds often come to the Occupational Health Hospital Department (UOOML), requiring a report on their fitness for work that often is generic or not suitable for specific situations: a detailed knowledge of both working and health conditions, mainly disabilities and job items are needed. The UOOML was never directly involved in the proceedings of targeted fitting-up of the disabled people, while some Doctors of the Department of Prevention of ASL have an advisory role participating in the Technical Committee under Law 68 and the 'Disabled Commission'. INAIL (the National Insurance Institute for Occupational Accidents and Diseases), in case of allocation of percentages of disability higher than 33% (necessary requirement for the targeted employment) provides an assessment of the 'residual capacity'. The Company Occupational Physician cooperates and intervenes in the management of the employment of the disabled worker in very different ways and at several stages of the path of integration or reintegration. Considering the prolonged and effective cooperation among the Doctors of the UOOML and the Psysiatrists of our Hospital, we are developing a specific out-patients' department where a report on the fitness for job, as close as possible to the patient/work-task compliance, is provided to the disabled.

[Manual lifting of patients: experience at the Riuniti di Bergamo Hospital]

The manual lifting of patients is a risk factor in the working activity of hospital nurses and it causes a high prevalence of low-back pain in these workers. The evaluation of risk has been performed in various Occupational Units of our hospital in accordance with art. 4 of Legislative Decree 626/94. The results of this evaluation, have led to implement the following preventive measures: health surveillance, professional training, purchase of special furniture and ergonomic supports.

[Repetitive movement of the upper limbs: results of exposure evaluation and clinical investigation in wood sanding in Bergamo]

The authors report their findings regarding a risk assessment study and clinical tests carried out among a group of 121 workers whose job was to sandpaper and buff timber products. The results of the risk assessment indicate that the job in question is at significant risk for the development of WMSDs in relation to the principal risk factors (repetitiveness, force, posture, short recovery periods). The clinical tests, undertaken by medical staff, complied with the anamnestic models proposed by EPM. The results showed that 21 workers were above the anamnestic threshold, and were thus referred for specialist examinations. As a result of the latter, the relevant diagnoses were made. A positive correlation was reported between the occupational exposure level and the clinical abnormalities detected.