1
|
Kasting ML, Laily A, Burney HN, Head KJ, Daggy JK, Zimet GD, Schwab-Reese LM. County-Level Factors Associated With Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccination in Indiana, 2020‒2022. Am J Public Health 2024; 114:415-423. [PMID: 38386970 PMCID: PMC10937598 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2023.307553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
Objectives. To assess COVID-19 and influenza vaccination rates across Indiana's 92 counties and identify county-level factors associated with vaccination. Methods. We analyzed county-level data on adult COVID-19 vaccination from the Indiana vaccine registry and 2021 adult influenza vaccination from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We used multiple linear regression (MLR) to determine county-level predictors of vaccinations. Results. COVID-19 vaccination ranged from 31.2% to 87.6% (mean = 58.0%); influenza vaccination ranged from 33.7% to 53.1% (mean = 42.9%). In MLR, COVID-19 vaccination was significantly associated with primary care providers per capita (b = 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02, 0.05), median household income (b = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.12, 0.34), percentage Medicare enrollees with a mammogram (b = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.08, 0.51), percentage uninsured (b = -1.22; 95% CI = -1.57, -0.87), percentage African American (b = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.19, 0.42), percentage female (b = -0.97; 95% CI = -1.79, ‒0.15), and percentage who smoke (b = -0.75; 95% CI = -1.26, -0.23). Influenza vaccination was significantly associated with percentage uninsured (b = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.22, 1.21), percentage African American (b = -0.07; 95% CI = -0.13, -0.01), percentage Hispanic (b = -0.28; 95% CI = -0.40, -0.17), percentage who smoke (b = -0.85; 95% CI = -1.06, -0.64), and percentage who completed high school (b = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.21, 0.87). The MLR models explained 86.7% (COVID-19) and 70.2% (influenza) of the variance. Conclusions. Factors associated with COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations varied. Variables reflecting access to care (e.g., insurance) and higher risk of severe disease (e.g., smoking) are notable. Programs to improve access and target high-risk populations may improve vaccination rates. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(4):415-423. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307553).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica L Kasting
- Monica L. Kasting, Alfu Laily, and Laura M. Schwab-Reese are with the Department of Public Health at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Heather N. Burney and Joanne K. Daggy are with the Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. Katharine J. Head is with the Department of Communication Studies at Indiana University‒Purdue University, Indianapolis. Gregory D. Zimet is professor emeritus of Pediatrics and Psychiatry at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Alfu Laily
- Monica L. Kasting, Alfu Laily, and Laura M. Schwab-Reese are with the Department of Public Health at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Heather N. Burney and Joanne K. Daggy are with the Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. Katharine J. Head is with the Department of Communication Studies at Indiana University‒Purdue University, Indianapolis. Gregory D. Zimet is professor emeritus of Pediatrics and Psychiatry at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Heather N Burney
- Monica L. Kasting, Alfu Laily, and Laura M. Schwab-Reese are with the Department of Public Health at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Heather N. Burney and Joanne K. Daggy are with the Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. Katharine J. Head is with the Department of Communication Studies at Indiana University‒Purdue University, Indianapolis. Gregory D. Zimet is professor emeritus of Pediatrics and Psychiatry at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Katharine J Head
- Monica L. Kasting, Alfu Laily, and Laura M. Schwab-Reese are with the Department of Public Health at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Heather N. Burney and Joanne K. Daggy are with the Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. Katharine J. Head is with the Department of Communication Studies at Indiana University‒Purdue University, Indianapolis. Gregory D. Zimet is professor emeritus of Pediatrics and Psychiatry at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Joanne K Daggy
- Monica L. Kasting, Alfu Laily, and Laura M. Schwab-Reese are with the Department of Public Health at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Heather N. Burney and Joanne K. Daggy are with the Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. Katharine J. Head is with the Department of Communication Studies at Indiana University‒Purdue University, Indianapolis. Gregory D. Zimet is professor emeritus of Pediatrics and Psychiatry at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Monica L. Kasting, Alfu Laily, and Laura M. Schwab-Reese are with the Department of Public Health at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Heather N. Burney and Joanne K. Daggy are with the Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. Katharine J. Head is with the Department of Communication Studies at Indiana University‒Purdue University, Indianapolis. Gregory D. Zimet is professor emeritus of Pediatrics and Psychiatry at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Laura M Schwab-Reese
- Monica L. Kasting, Alfu Laily, and Laura M. Schwab-Reese are with the Department of Public Health at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Heather N. Burney and Joanne K. Daggy are with the Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. Katharine J. Head is with the Department of Communication Studies at Indiana University‒Purdue University, Indianapolis. Gregory D. Zimet is professor emeritus of Pediatrics and Psychiatry at the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Presa J, Findlow J, Zimet GD. Meningococcal Vaccination of Adolescents in the United States: Past Successes and Future Considerations. J Adolesc Health 2024:S1054-139X(24)00052-1. [PMID: 38430074 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a rare but serious illness, and adolescents and young adults in the United States are at increased risk. Here, we discuss US IMD history and how successful disease prevention through routine vaccination against the most common disease-causing serogroups (A, B, C, W, and Y) can inform future recommendations. Before the introduction of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) vaccines, most US cases of IMD were caused by serogroups B, C, and Y. After recommendation by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for routine MenACWY vaccination of 11-12-year-olds in 2005, followed by a 2010 booster recommendation, MenCWY disease incidence declined dramatically, and vaccine coverage remains high. Two serogroup B (MenB) vaccines are licensed in the United States, but uptake is low compared with MenACWY vaccines, likely because Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends MenB vaccination subject to shared clinical decision-making rather than routinely for all adolescents. The proportion of adolescent IMD caused by MenB has now increased. Pentavalent vaccines that protect against serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y may provide an optimal strategy for improving vaccination rates to ultimately reduce MenB incidence while maintaining the historically low rates of IMD caused by serogroups A, C, W, and Y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Presa
- Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
| | - Jamie Findlow
- Vaccines Medical Development & Scientific/Clinical Affairs, Pfizer Ltd, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miller ME, Rahim MQ, Coven SL, Jacob SA, Zimet GD, Meagher CG, Ott MA. Pediatric hematology and oncology physician and nurse practitioner views of the HPV vaccine and barriers to administration. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2224089. [PMID: 37350478 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2224089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Rates of Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination among pediatric survivors of cancer and patients with sickle cell disease are lower than the national average. While recent attention has focused on patient HPV vaccine hesitancy and refusal, less is known about provider-level and system-level barriers to vaccinations in pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) populations. Applying thematic analysis to qualitative interviews with 20 pediatric hematology/oncology physicians and nurse practitioners, we examine their views regarding HPV vaccination, with a focus on access and barriers to providing HPV vaccination in PHO practices. Results demonstrated that despite 90% of interviewees supporting HPV vaccination in their population, the number of pediatric hematology/oncology providers who reported that they counsel about HPV or provide HPV vaccination was 45%, even in stem cell and sickle cell clinics, where other childhood vaccines are commonly provided. Clinicians identified provider-level, clinic-level, and system-level barriers to giving the HPV vaccination, including but not limited to time/flow constraints, lack of resources, and continued education regarding the HPV vaccine. These barriers impede the ability for pediatric hematology/oncology providers to counsel and provide HPV vaccination to this specialized population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meagan E Miller
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Adult Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IA, USA
| | - Mahvish Q Rahim
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IA, USA
| | - Scott L Coven
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IA, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IA, USA
| | - Seethal A Jacob
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Division Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IA, USA
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Comparative Effectiveness Research, Indianpolis, IA, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IA, USA
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IA, USA
| | - Carolyn G Meagher
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IA, USA
| | - Mary A Ott
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IA, USA
- IU Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harris JN, Mauro CM, Morgan TL, de Roche A, Zimet GD, Rosenthal SL. Factors impacting parental uptake of COVID-19 vaccination for U.S. Children ages 5-17. Vaccine 2023; 41:3151-3155. [PMID: 37045680 PMCID: PMC10080272 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccination of U.S. children lags behind adult vaccination, but remains critical in mitigating the pandemic. Using a subset of a nationally representative survey, this study examined factors contributing to parental uptake of COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 12-17 and 5-11, stratified by parental COVID-19 vaccination status. Among vaccinated parents, uptake was higher for 12-17-year-olds (78.6%) than 5-11-year-olds (50.7%); only two unvaccinated parents vaccinated their children. Child influenza vaccination was predictive of uptake for both age groups, while side effect concerns remained significant only for younger children. Although parents were more likely to involve adolescents in vaccine decision-making than younger children, this was not predictive of vaccine uptake. These results highlight the importance of addressing the unique and shared concerns parents have regarding COVID-19 vaccination for children of varying ages. Future work should further explore adolescent/child perspectives of involvement in COVID-19 vaccination decision-making to support developmentally appropriate involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julen N Harris
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine M Mauro
- Department of Biostatistics at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tucker L Morgan
- Department of Biostatistics at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ariel de Roche
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Susan L Rosenthal
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry at Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Srivastava T, Head KJ, O'Dell SM, Feemster KA, Panozzo CA, Zimet GD, Kornides ML. Characterizing U.S. mothers with high human papillomavirus vaccine intent yet unvaccinated adolescents. Prev Med 2023; 169:107472. [PMID: 36854366 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
HPV vaccination rates remain suboptimal in the United States. While the current literature focuses on expressly hesitant parents, few studies have examined parents with "high intent", or those indicating they definitely will vaccinate and have had the opportunity but not yet vaccinated their adolescents. Our objective was to differentiate characteristics of mothers with high intent from those who already vaccinated their adolescents using various socioeconomic, previous vaccine decision-making, and healthcare provider relationship-related variables. English-speaking mothers or female guardians of adolescents ages 11-14 years living in low HPV vaccine uptake states within the U.S. in September 2018 were recruited from a national survey panel as part of a larger study. We assessed HPV vaccine status of their adolescents and categorized respondents into two categories: Already Vaccinated and High Intent. We assessed differences using a multivariable logistic regression model. Among 2406 mothers, 18% reported high intent vs. 82% already having vaccinated. Mothers with high intent were more likely to identify as non-Hispanic White (p = 0.01), to have a younger adolescent (p < 0.001), and to report not receiving a provider HPV vaccination recommendation (p < 0.001). Mothers who estimated that half/more (vs. less) of their child's friends have received/will receive the vaccine had higher odds of already vaccinating (p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that clinicians may be able to improve HPV vaccination uptake within their practices by giving repeated, high-quality recommendations to parents of children who are not yet vaccinated. Additionally, these findings indicate perceived social norms may play a large role in on-time vaccine uptake. Reassuring hesitant parents that most parents accept the vaccine may also improve uptake in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuhina Srivastava
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Cavanaugh Hall 307C, 425 University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Sean M O'Dell
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Kristen A Feemster
- Vaccine Education Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10(th) Street, HS 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Melanie L Kornides
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harris JN, Mauro C, Andresen JA, Zimet GD, Rosenthal SL. COVID-19 vaccine uptake and attitudes towards mandates in a nationally representative U.S. sample. J Behav Med 2023; 46:25-39. [PMID: 35486335 PMCID: PMC9051757 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-022-00317-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Widespread uptake of COVID-19 vaccination is vital to curtailing the pandemic, yet rates remain suboptimal in the U.S. Vaccine mandates have previously been successful, but are controversial. An April 2021 survey of a nationally representative sample (N = 1208) examined vaccine uptake, attitudes, and sociodemographic characteristics. Sixty-seven percent were vaccine acceptors, 14% wait-and-see, and 19% non-acceptors. Compared to wait-and-see and non-acceptors, acceptors were more likely to have a household member over age 65, have received a flu shot, have positive COVID-19 vaccine attitudes, and view COVID-19 vaccination as beneficial. Mandate support was higher among respondents who were vaccine acceptors, had positive views about COVID-19 vaccines, believed in COVID-19 preventive strategies, perceived COVID-19 as severe, were liberal, resided in the Northeast, were non-White, and had incomes < $75,000. Public health campaigns should target attitudes that appear to drive hesitancy and prepare for varying mandate support based on demographics, COVID-19 vaccine attitudes, and the scope of the mandate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julen N Harris
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th St, 17th Fl Room 102A, New York, NY, 10032, USA
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine Mauro
- Department of Biostatistics at the Mailman School of Public Health at, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jane A Andresen
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th St, 17th Fl Room 102A, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Susan L Rosenthal
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th St, 17th Fl Room 102A, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry at Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morales-Campos DY, Zimet GD, Kahn JA. Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States. Pediatr Clin North Am 2023; 70:211-226. [PMID: 36841591 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
Although the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends vaccinating adolescents against the human papillomavirus (HPV) to prevent HPV-associated cancers, vaccine initiation and completion rates are suboptimal. Parental and provider hesitancy contributes significantly to low HPV vaccine uptake. This review describes sources of HPV vaccine hesitancy using a World Health Organization framework that categorizes determinants of vaccine hesitancy as follows: contextual factors (historical, sociocultural, environmental, or political factors), individual and group factors (personal perception or influences of the social/peer environment), and vaccine/vaccination-specific issues (directly related to vaccine or vaccination).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisy Y Morales-Campos
- Department of Mexican American and Latino/a Studies, Latino Research Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, 210 West 24th Street, GWB 1.102, F9200, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 West 10th Street, HS 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Jessica A Kahn
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 4000, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Allen JD, Matsunaga M, Lim E, Zimet GD, Nguyen KH, Fontenot HB. Parental Decision Making Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines for Children under Age 5: Does Decision Self-Efficacy Play a Role? Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:478. [PMID: 36851355 PMCID: PMC9959902 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 vaccines are now available under Emergency Use Authorization for children ages 6 months to 5 years. We examined parents' intentions to vaccinate their children under the age of 5 years and assessed whether their confidence in making an informed decision about vaccination (decision self-efficacy) was associated with these intentions. METHOD We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of U.S. parents between 23 March and 5 April 2022. We examined associations between parental intention to vaccinate their young children ( RESULTS Of the 591 parents in this sample, 49% indicated that they intended to vaccinate their child(ren), 29% reported that they would not, and 21% were undecided. In bivariate analyses, race/ethnicity, health insurance, flu vaccination in the past 12 months, and parental COVID-19 vaccination status were significantly related to parental intention to vaccinate their child(ren). In the multivariable analyses, which controlled for these factors, parents who intended to vaccinate their child(ren) had greater confidence in their ability to make informed decisions about COVID-19 vaccinations compared to those who were unsure about vaccination. Each one standard deviation in the Decision Self-Efficacy score was associated with a 39% increase in intention to vaccinate one's child versus being unsure about vaccination (AOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09, 1.77). CONCLUSIONS Parents who are unsure about vaccinating their children against COVID-19 may benefit from interventions designed to increase their ability to obtain, understand, and utilize information to make informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer D. Allen
- Department of Community Health, Tufts University School of Arts and Sciences, 574 Boston Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA
| | - Masako Matsunaga
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Eunjung Lim
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 West 10th Street, Suite 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Kimberly H. Nguyen
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University Medical School, 136 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | - Holly B. Fontenot
- Nancy Atmospera-Walch School of Nursing, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2528 McCarthy Mall, Webster Hall, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tatar O, Haward B, Zhu P, Griffin-Mathieu G, Perez S, McBride E, Lofters AK, Smith LW, Mayrand MH, Daley EM, Brotherton JML, Zimet GD, Rosberger Z. Understanding the Challenges of HPV-Based Cervical Screening: Development and Validation of HPV Testing and Self-Sampling Attitudes and Beliefs Scales. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1206-1219. [PMID: 36661742 PMCID: PMC9858121 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The disrupted introduction of the HPV-based cervical screening program in several jurisdictions has demonstrated that the attitudes and beliefs of screening-eligible persons are critically implicated in the success of program implementation (including the use of self-sampling). As no up-to-date and validated measures exist measuring attitudes and beliefs towards HPV testing and self-sampling, this study aimed to develop and validate two scales measuring these factors. In October-November 2021, cervical screening-eligible Canadians participated in a web-based survey. In total, 44 items related to HPV testing and 13 items related to HPV self-sampling attitudes and beliefs were included in the survey. For both scales, the optimal number of factors was identified using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and parallel analysis. Item Response Theory (IRT) was applied within each factor to select items. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to assess model fit. After data cleaning, 1027 responses were analyzed. The HPV Testing Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (HTABS) had four factors, and twenty-two items were retained after item reduction. The HPV Self-sampling Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (HSABS) had two factors and seven items were retained. CFA showed a good model fit for both final scales. The developed scales will be a valuable resource to examine attitudes and beliefs in anticipation of, and to evaluate, HPV test-based cervical screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ovidiu Tatar
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Ben Haward
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Patricia Zhu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Gabrielle Griffin-Mathieu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Samara Perez
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
| | - Emily McBride
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Aisha K. Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1B3, Canada
| | | | - Marie-Hélène Mayrand
- Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
- Département d’Obstétrique-Gynécologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Ellen M. Daley
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Julia M. L. Brotherton
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VI 3010, Australia
- Population Health, Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Melbourne, VI 3053, Australia
| | - Gregory D. Zimet
- School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada
- Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Footman A, Kanney N, Niccolai LM, Zimet GD, Overton ET, Davies SL, Van Der Pol B. Parents' Acceptance of COVID-19 Compared to Human Papillomavirus Vaccines. J Adolesc Health 2022; 71:673-678. [PMID: 36208985 PMCID: PMC9533113 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The first vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) for adolescents 16 years and older in the United States received Emergency Use Authorization in December 2020. Soon after its approval, parents expressed concerns about vaccine safety for adolescents. Similar concerns about vaccine safety partially explain suboptimal human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake. This qualitative study explores similarities and differences in parents' attitudes about these two vaccines. METHODS Parents were recruited through social media and at health centers in Alabama. Semi-structured interviews with parents of adolescents aged 9-17 years were conducted before and after Alabama expanded age eligibility to those 16 and older. Topics included knowledge about HPV and COVID-19 vaccines, and parents' intentions to have children vaccinated. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS From March 11, 2021 to April 24, 2021, 21 in-depth interviews were conducted. Parents discussed the importance of HPV and COVID-19 vaccines for protecting their children's health but differences between the two related to community protection. Parents were concerned about vaccine safety but media coverage about the COVID-19 vaccine led to more favorable attitudes about the benefits of vaccination, which was not observed for HPV vaccines. Instead for HPV vaccination, parents wanted their healthcare providers' opinions about the vaccine before making a vaccination decision. DISCUSSION Parents had similar concerns about HPV and COVID-19 vaccines. Although provider recommendations can improve vaccine uptake, local news reports were seen to have a positive impact on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in lieu of provider recommendation. Disseminating information online could be beneficial to promote HPV and COVID-19 vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Footman
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama.
| | - Nita Kanney
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Linda M Niccolai
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Susan L Davies
- Tulane University, School of Social Work, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Barbara Van Der Pol
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, Alabama; University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Miller ME, Rahim MQ, Coven SL, Jacob SA, Zimet GD, Meagher CG, Ott MA. Pediatric hematology/oncology physician and nurse practitioner attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative study. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2048560. [PMID: 35344683 PMCID: PMC9225389 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2048560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
As of 05/28/2021, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) had caused 3.9 million infections in the United States (US) pediatric population since its discovery in December of 2019. The development and expansion of vaccination has markedly changed the shape of the epidemic. In this qualitative study, we report on pediatric hematology/oncology provider views on the COVID-19 vaccine prior to approval in the adolescent population <16 years of age. Results from interviews with 20 providers across the state of Indiana showed that most were supportive of the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy adults. However, the majority also expressed a need to see more data on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccinations in pediatric hematology/oncology populations. While they recognized the public health importance of vaccination, their duty to protect their patients led to a need for more specific safety and efficacy data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meagan E Miller
- Department of Adult Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
| | - Mahvish Q Rahim
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
| | - Scott L Coven
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
| | - Seethal A Jacob
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
| | - Carolyn G Meagher
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
| | - Mary A Ott
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States.,IU Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lin Y, Cai CZ, Hu Z, Zimet GD, Alias H, Wong LP. The influence of men on HPV vaccination of their spouse/partner in China. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2049132. [PMID: 35380926 PMCID: PMC9196783 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2049132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Men involvement in HPV vaccine advocacy is important in a patriarchal society. This study aimed to investigate the influence of men on HPV vaccination of adult women. An online cross-sectional survey was undertaken between June and August 2019. Participants were fathers of children enrolled in schools in Fujian Province. A total of 1953 participants responded to our survey. Just over 60% reported they would definitely or likely support their spouse/partner to receive HPV vaccine. Physician recommendation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.68, 95%CI = 3.89–6.86) and spouse/partner communication about HPV vaccination (aOR = 5.30, 95%CI = 3.72–7.55) were significant covariates associated with higher willingness to support women’s HPV vaccination. Perceiving HPV vaccination as only for women who have had multiple sex partners and HPV vaccination as a sensitive topic were significantly associated with lower willingness to support HPV vaccination. Over two-thirds (67.3%) reported joint HPV vaccination decision-making and 2.8% reported that it was entirely the man’s decision. The role of men in HPV vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among adult women is evident in China and warrants educational interventions to target men to enhance women’s HPV vaccination uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulan Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Carla Zi Cai
- Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Zhijian Hu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - Haridah Alias
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Li Ping Wong
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.,Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Haward B, Tatar O, Zhu P, Griffin-Mathieu G, Perez S, Shapiro GK, McBride E, Zimet GD, Rosberger Z. Development and validation of the cervical cancer knowledge scale and HPV testing knowledge scale in a sample of Canadian women. Prev Med Rep 2022; 30:102017. [PMID: 36281348 PMCID: PMC9587520 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge of cervical cancer and HPV testing are important factors in proactive and continued engagement with screening and are critical considerations as countries move towards the implementation of HPV-based primary screening programs. However, existing scales measuring knowledge of both cervical cancer and HPV testing are not up to date with the current literature, lack advanced psychometric testing, or have suboptimal psychometric properties. Updated, validated scales are needed to ensure accurate measurement of these factors. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate two scales measuring cervical cancer knowledge and HPV testing knowledge. A pool of items was generated by retaining relevant existing items identified in a 2019 literature search and developing new items according to themes identified in recent systematic reviews. Items were assessed for relevance by the research team and then refined through seven cognitive interviews with Canadian women. A web-based survey including the remaining items (fourteen for each scale development) was administered to a sample of Canadian women in October and November of 2021. After data cleaning, N = 1027 responses were retained. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were conducted, and Item Response Theory was used to select items. The final cervical cancer knowledge scale (CCKS) and HPV testing knowledge scale (HTKS) were unidimensional, and each consisted of eight items. CFA demonstrated adequate model fit for both scales. The developed scales will be important tools to identify knowledge gaps and inform communications about cervical cancer screening, particularly in the context of HPV-based screening implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Haward
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ovidiu Tatar
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada,Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada,Corresponding author at: Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Patricia Zhu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Samara Perez
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada,Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gilla K. Shapiro
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emily McBride
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Zeev Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (LDI), Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada,Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Andresen JA, Harris JN, Mauro C, Zimet GD, Rosenthal SL. The impact of financial incentives on COVID-19 vaccination intention among a sample of U.S. adults. Prev Med Rep 2022; 29:101962. [PMID: 36065257 PMCID: PMC9434908 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Financial incentives are one of several strategies that have been explored to enhance COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Although widely discussed, it is unclear how much of an incentive and for which subset of individuals incentives would be effective. This study explored the impact of hypothetical $600 or $1200 incentives on COVID-19 vaccination intention. From a nationally representative panel of U.S. adults, 346 individuals reported hesitance towards COVID-19 vaccination and were then asked about their willingness to accept a vaccine if offered hypothetical incentives. Results indicated 26.89% would get vaccinated if offered $600, and 30.06% if offered $1200. In the multivariable model that included sociodemographic and attitudinal predictors of vaccine uptake, those classified as ‘wait-and-see’ compared to those classified as non-acceptors were more likely to accept COVID-19 vaccines when given financial incentives, and those who believed more strongly in the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines were more likely to accept a vaccine when first offered hypothetical $600 and then $1200 incentives. Individuals unsure if they ever had COVID-19 were significantly less likely to be willing to get the vaccine for $1200 as compared to those who believed they previously had COVID-19. These results suggest that financial incentives can increase intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane A Andresen
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julen N Harris
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine Mauro
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Susan L Rosenthal
- Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Capasso M, Caso D, Zimet GD. The Mediating Roles of Attitude Toward COVID-19 Vaccination, Trust in Science and Trust in Government in the Relationship Between Anti-vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs and Vaccination Intention. Front Psychol 2022; 13:936917. [PMID: 36118432 PMCID: PMC9479343 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, many conspiracy theories have spread widely, which has the potential to reduce adherence to recommended preventive measures. Specifically, anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs can have a strong negative impact on COVID-19 vaccination attitude and intention. The present study aimed to clarify how such beliefs can reduce vaccination intention, exploring the possible mediating roles of attitude toward vaccination, trust in science, and trust in government, among a sample of 822 unvaccinated Italian adults (Women = 67.4%; Mage = 38.1). Path analysis showed that anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs influenced intention to get vaccinated both directly and indirectly through the mediating effects of attitude, trust in science, and trust in government. In particular, the simple mediating effect of attitude was the strongest one, followed by the serial mediating effect of trust in science and attitude itself. Findings provide insights into the design of interventions aimed at reducing misinformation and subsequent vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Capasso
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Caso
- Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- *Correspondence: Daniela Caso,
| | - Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wong LP, Alias H, Seheli FN, Zimet GD, Hu Z, Lin Y. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination intent and its associated factors: a study of ethnically diverse married women aged 27 to 45 in Malaysia, a Southeast Asian country. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2076525. [PMID: 35714272 PMCID: PMC9481129 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2076525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study aimed to investigate HPV vaccination intention among adult married women aged 27 to 45 years and its associated factors, and their spouse/partner’s influence on HPV vaccination decision-making. Methods This is a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study. Study participants were recruited through simple random sampling of patients attending obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinics in a university teaching hospital. Participants were selected based on a computer-generated list of a random list of patients attending the clinic. Results A total of 794 complete responses were received (response rate 88.2%). The mean age of the respondents was 32.2 years with a standard deviation (SD) of ±3.9 years.The vast majority (85.3%) would communicate with their spouse/partner with regard to HPV vaccination decision-making. Nearly 30% (over half were of the Malay ethnic group) perceived their spouse/partner would not consent to their HPV vaccination. Over half (54.9%) reported joint decision-making, and 9.1% (the majority of whom were Malay) reported that HPV vaccination was dependent on their spouse/partner’s decision. Intention to vaccinate against HPV was high (74.5%). Factors influencing HPV vaccination intention were spouse/partner’s consent to HPV vaccination (odds ratio [OR] = 4.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.08–6.62), being a postgraduate student (OR = 4.55; 95% CI, 2.13–9.72 vs. unemployed/housewife), average household income MYR2000–4000 (OR = 2.09; 95%CI, 1.16–3.78 vs. below MYR2000), and an HPV-related knowledge score of 9–20 (OR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.10–2.32 vs. score 0–8). Conclusion Findings highlight the importance of culture-centered interventions to enhance male partner’s awareness and support for the HPV vaccination of married women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Ping Wong
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Haridah Alias
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Farhana Nishat Seheli
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zhijian Hu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yulan Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brennan LP, Rodriguez NM, Head KJ, Zimet GD, Kasting ML. Obstetrician/gynecologists' HPV vaccination recommendations among women and girls 26 and younger. Prev Med Rep 2022; 27:101772. [PMID: 35321213 PMCID: PMC8935521 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) are well poised to vaccinate girls and young women against HPV, however little is known about if and how they recommend the HPV vaccine. This study aims to understand factors associated with strong and frequent HPV vaccine recommendations among OB/GYNs for patients 26 years and younger. Methods 224 practicing U.S. OB/GYNs were surveyed for how strongly and frequently they recommend the HPV vaccine to patients 26 and younger. Provider beliefs, knowledge, and preferences surrounding the vaccine, as well as clinic and patient-level variables were examined as covariates. We then examined the relationships using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results Of the 224 respondents, 205 were included in the analysis, with 57% (n = 116) reporting strongly and frequently recommending the HPV vaccination to eligible patients 26 and younger. The regression showed two provider beliefs and two clinic-level attributes to be strongly associated with strong and frequent recommendations. Being a strong and frequent recommender was positively associated with believing other gynecologists frequently recommend the vaccine (aOR 24.33 95%CI[2.56-231.14]) and believing that 50% or more of their patients are interested in receiving the vaccine (aOR 2.77 95%CI[1.25-6.13]). The clinic-level attributes were having the vaccine stocked (aOR 2.66 95%CI[1.02-6.93]) and suburban (aOR 3.31 95%CI[1.07-10.19]) or urban (aOR 3.54 95%CI[1.07-11.76]) location versus rural. Conclusions These findings suggest that OB/GYN peer support and educating OB/GYN about patients' interest in HPV vaccination may improve HPV vaccination. This work can inform clinic-level interventions including stocking the vaccine and focusing improvement efforts on rural clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke P Brennan
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 206 S Martin Jischke Dr, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
- Indiana University Medical Scientist/Engineer Training Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Natalia M Rodriguez
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, 206 S Martin Jischke Dr, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
- Department of Public Health, Purdue University, Matthews Hall, 812 W State St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 425 University Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Monica L Kasting
- Department of Public Health, Purdue University, Matthews Hall, 812 W State St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lake PW, Head KJ, Christy SM, DeMaria AL, Thompson EL, Vadaparampil ST, Zimet GD, Kasting ML. Association between patient characteristics and HPV vaccination recommendation for postpartum patients: A national survey of Obstetrician/Gynecologists. Prev Med Rep 2022; 27:101801. [PMID: 35518719 PMCID: PMC9061621 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in the U.S. are relatively low. Provider recommendation rates for HPV vaccination often vary by patient age and relationship status. Obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) represent a key provider group that can recommend the HPV vaccine. This study examined differences in OB/GYN recommendation of HPV vaccination for inpatient postpartum patients by age, parity, and marital status. Data were collected from OB/GYNs nationally via a cross-sectional survey. Participants were randomized to two vignette groups (23-year-old patient or 33-year-old patient). Within each group, participants received 4 vignettes that were identical except for patient marital status (married/not in a committed relationship) and number of children (first/third child), and were asked to indicate HPV vaccination recommendation likelihood on a scale of 0 (definitely would not) to 100 (definitely would). A 2 × 2 × 2 general linear model with repeated measures was used to examine main and interaction effects of patient age, relationship status, and parity. 207 OB/GYNs were included in the final analyses. Recommendation was high for 23-year-old patients (range: 64.5–84.6 out of 100). When marital status and parity were held constant, recommendation likelihood was higher for the younger vs. older patient and was also higher for patients not in a committed relationship, compared to married patients (all p-values < 0.001). Differences in recommendation exist when considering age and relationship status, which provides insight into OB/GYN clinical decision-making. Findings highlight the need to address barriers to HPV vaccination recommendation, including awareness of risk factors to consider when recommending the vaccine.
Collapse
|
19
|
Head KJ, Zimet GD, Yiannoutsos CT, Silverman RD, Sanner L, Menachemi N. Factors that differentiate COVID-19 vaccine intentions among Indiana parents: Implications for targeted vaccine promotion. Prev Med 2022; 158:107023. [PMID: 35307370 PMCID: PMC8928699 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Given low rates of uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine for children 12-17 and 5-11 years old, research is needed to understand parental behaviors and behavioral intentions related to COVID-19 vaccination for their children. In the state of Indiana, we conducted a non-random, online survey of parents or caregivers (N = 10,266) about their COVID-19 vaccine intentions or behaviors, demographic characteristics, and potential motivating reasons for getting the vaccine. In terms of behaviors/intentions, 44.8% of participants indicated they were vaccine acceptors (i.e., had already had their children vaccinated or would as soon as it was possible), 13.0% indicated they were vaccine hesitators (i.e., wanted to wait and see), and 42.2% indicated they were vaccine rejecters (i.e., would not vaccinate or only would if mandated). Compared to vaccine rejecters, vaccine hesitators were more likely to be motivated by perceptions of vaccine safety and efficacy, normative influences such as close friends/family who had been vaccinated and a recommendation from a provider, as well as if they were vaccinated themselves. These findings have implications for the development of targeted vaccine promotion strategies, such as social norms messaging and a focus on vaccine safety, in order to increase COVID-19 vaccination for eligible children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, United States of America.
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States of America.
| | - Constantin T Yiannoutsos
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, United States of America.
| | - Ross D Silverman
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, United States of America
| | - Lindsey Sanner
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, United States of America.
| | - Nir Menachemi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nakhostin-Ansari A, Zimet GD, Khonji MS, Aghajani F, Teymourzadeh A, Rastegar Kazerooni AA, Pirayandeh P, Aghajani R, Safari S, Khalaj K, Memari AH. Acceptance or Rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Study on Iranian People's Opinions toward the COVID-19 Vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10050670. [PMID: 35632426 PMCID: PMC9143028 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10050670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to assess the Iranian people’s attitude and confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine, their concerns about the safety of vaccines, and their reasons for accepting or rejecting the COVID-19 vaccine. We conducted a web-based cross-sectional study with a mixed qualitative−quantitative approach from December 2020 to February 2021. Our questionnaire consisted of a COVID-19 vaccine attitude questionnaire, a COVID-19 vaccine confidence inventory, a modified vaccine safety scale, and questions about participants’ decision to accept or refuse the COVID-19 vaccine, and their explanations for their decisions. The research included 1928 people with an average age of 34.88 years with 1236 (64.1%) being female. A total of 1330 participants desired to have the COVID-19 vaccine (69%). Female gender, lower educational levels, following COVID-19 news through sources other than websites and social media, not following COVID-19 news, and loss of a first-degree relative due to COVID-19 were all associated with a more negative attitude toward the COVID-19 vaccine (p < 0.01). To conclude, the acceptance rate of the COVID-19 vaccine among Iranians is comparable to the international average; however, it is still unfavorable. There are serious challenges to the vaccination program in Iran, such as older adults’ lower intention to undergo the COVID-19 vaccine and misinformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amin Nakhostin-Ansari
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran;
| | - Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA;
| | - Mohammad Saeid Khonji
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran; (M.S.K.); (A.T.); (R.A.); (K.K.)
| | - Faezeh Aghajani
- Research Development Center, Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran;
| | - Azin Teymourzadeh
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran; (M.S.K.); (A.T.); (R.A.); (K.K.)
| | | | - Pendar Pirayandeh
- School of Medicine, Tonekabon Islamic Azad University, Mazandaran 4684161167, Iran;
| | - Reyhaneh Aghajani
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran; (M.S.K.); (A.T.); (R.A.); (K.K.)
| | - Sepideh Safari
- School of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1949635881, Iran;
| | - Kamand Khalaj
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran; (M.S.K.); (A.T.); (R.A.); (K.K.)
| | - Amir Hossein Memari
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417613151, Iran;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +98-92-1575-2817; Fax: +98-21-8800-3539
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Griffin-Mathieu G, Haward B, Tatar O, Zhu P, Perez S, Shapiro GK, McBride E, Thompson EL, Smith LW, Lofters AK, Daley EM, Guichon JR, Waller J, Steben M, Decker KM, Mayrand MH, Brotherton JML, Ogilvie GS, Zimet GD, Norris T, Rosberger Z. Ensuring a successful transition from Pap to HPV-based primary cervical cancer screening in Canada by investigating the psychosocial correlates of women’s intentions: Protocol for an observational study (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e38917. [PMID: 35708742 PMCID: PMC9247817 DOI: 10.2196/38917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Objective Methods Results Conclusions International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Griffin-Mathieu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ben Haward
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ovidiu Tatar
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patricia Zhu
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Samara Perez
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Cedars Cancer Center, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- HPV Global Action, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gilla K Shapiro
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emily McBride
- Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erika L Thompson
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, The University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | | | - Aisha K Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ellen M Daley
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Juliet R Guichon
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jo Waller
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Steben
- HPV Global Action, Montreal, QC, Canada
- School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kathleen M Decker
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Cancer Care Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Marie-Helene Mayrand
- Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Département d'obstétrique-gynécologie, Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julia M L Brotherton
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Population Health, Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gina S Ogilvie
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- School of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States
| | | | - Zeev Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- HPV Global Action, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wong LP, Alias H, Danaee M, Ahmed J, Lachyan A, Cai CZ, Lin Y, Hu Z, Tan SY, Lu Y, Cai G, Nguyen DK, Seheli FN, Alhammadi F, Madhale MD, Atapattu M, Quazi-Bodhanya T, Mohajer S, Zimet GD, Zhao Q. COVID-19 vaccination intention and vaccine characteristics influencing vaccination acceptance: a global survey of 17 countries. Infect Dis Poverty 2021; 10:122. [PMID: 34620243 PMCID: PMC8496428 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-021-00900-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The availability of various types of COVID-19 vaccines and diverse characteristics of the vaccines present a dilemma in vaccination choices, which may result in individuals refusing a particular COVID-19 vaccine offered, hence presenting a threat to immunisation coverage and reaching herd immunity. The study aimed to assess global COVID-19 vaccination intention, vaccine characteristics influencing vaccination acceptance and desirable vaccine characteristics influencing the choice of vaccines. METHODS An anonymous cross-sectional survey was conducted between 4 January and 5 March 2021 in 17 countries worldwide. Proportions and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and vaccine characteristics influencing vaccination acceptance were generated and compared across countries and regions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS Of the 19,714 responses received, 90.4% (95% CI 81.8-95.3) reported likely or extremely likely to receive COVID-19 vaccine. A high proportion of likely or extremely likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine was reported in Australia (96.4%), China (95.3%) and Norway (95.3%), while a high proportion reported being unlikely or extremely unlikely to receive the vaccine in Japan (34.6%), the U.S. (29.4%) and Iran (27.9%). Males, those with a lower educational level and those of older age expressed a higher level of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Less than two-thirds (59.7%; 95% CI 58.4-61.0) reported only being willing to accept a vaccine with an effectiveness of more than 90%, and 74.5% (95% CI 73.4-75.5) said they would accept a COVID-19 vaccine with minor adverse reactions. A total of 21.0% (95% CI 20.0-22.0) reported not accepting an mRNA vaccine and 51.8% (95% CI 50.3-53.1) reported that they would only accept a COVID-19 vaccine from a specific country-of-origin. Countries from the Southeast Asia region reported the highest proportion of not accepting mRNA technology. The highest proportion from Europe and the Americas would only accept a vaccine produced by certain countries. The foremost important vaccine characteristic influencing vaccine choice is adverse reactions (40.6%; 95% CI 39.3-41.9) of a vaccine and effectiveness threshold (35.1%; 95% CI 33.9-36.4). CONCLUSIONS The inter-regional and individual country disparities in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy highlight the importance of designing an efficient plan for the delivery of interventions dynamically tailored to the local population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Ping Wong
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China.
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| | - Haridah Alias
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mahmoud Danaee
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jamil Ahmed
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Department of Community Health Science, Muhammad Medical College, Mirpurkhas, Sindh, 69000, Pakistan
| | - Abhishek Lachyan
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- World Health Organization National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP) Unit Belgaum World Customs Organization, Hindu Nagar, Tilakwadi, Belgaum, Karnataka, 590006, India
| | - Carla Zi Cai
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China
| | - Yulan Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China.
| | - Zhijian Hu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China.
| | - Si Ying Tan
- Leadership Institute for Global Health Transformation, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive, Singapore, 117549, Singapore
| | - Yixiao Lu
- Department of Public Health, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
| | - Guoxi Cai
- Department of Public Health, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
| | - Di Khanh Nguyen
- Department of Academic Affairs and Testing, Dong Nai Technology University, Dong Nai, Vietnam
| | - Farhana Nishat Seheli
- Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control & Research (IEDCR), Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Fatma Alhammadi
- Ministry of Health and Prevention (MOHAP), Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Milkar D Madhale
- Vijaya College of Nursing, Belgaum, Ayodhya Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka, 590001, India
| | - Muditha Atapattu
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
| | | | - Samira Mohajer
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W, 10th St., HS 1001, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Qinjian Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kasting ML, Christy SM, Stout ME, Zimet GD, Mosher CE. Attitudinal Correlates of HPV Vaccination in College Women. Clin Nurs Res 2021; 31:826-835. [PMID: 34538128 DOI: 10.1177/10547738211045227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study examined associations between general attitudes toward seeking medical care, attitudes about vaccines/fear of shots, and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake and intentions in college women. Hypothesized associations were framed by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Participants (N = 330, mean age = 18.9 years, 75% White) completed a one-time survey. The majority (61%; n = 201) had received ≥1 HPV vaccine dose. Hierarchical logistic regression examined relationships between attitudes and vaccine uptake. Pearson correlation coefficients and Kruskal-Wallis tests examined associations between attitudes and vaccine intentions. Results were partially consistent with the TPB. In the final model, perceived benefits, but not fear of shots, were associated with vaccine uptake. Among the unvaccinated, perceived benefits, but not fear of shots, were associated with vaccine intentions. Provider recommendation was the strongest predictor of vaccine uptake. Findings suggest interventions incorporating discussion of perceived benefits and provider recommendation may improve HPV vaccine receipt among college women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica L Kasting
- Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.,Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | | | | | - Catherine E Mosher
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, USA.,Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thompson EL, Daley EM, Washburn T, Salisbury-Keith K, Saslow D, Fontenot HB, Zimet GD. School-entry requirements for HPV vaccination: part of the patchwork for HPV-related cancer prevention. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:1975-1979. [PMID: 33327839 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1851130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination can prevent six types of HPV-related cancers, and approximately, 54.2% of adolescents are up-to-date with the HPV vaccine in the United States. While moderate success has been achieved with provider- and parent-focused interventions, HPV vaccination in the U.S. lags well behind desired goals. In order to maximize HPV vaccination and prevention of HPV-related cancers, it may be prudent to consider state policy approaches, such as school-entry requirements as part of the patchwork of provider, parent, and structural interventions. In this paper, we reviewed the history of efforts to implement school-entry requirements for HPV vaccine, the challenges and benefits associated with implementing these requirements, and the evidence for the effectiveness of school-entry requirements. In addition, we presented new data from Rhode Island's Immunization Information System (IIS) showing how their school-entry requirement, implemented in 2015, has impacted HPV vaccination rates. These registry data indicate that HPV vaccination rates improved significantly after the 2014-2015 school year and policy implementation, and add to the ongoing evidence supporting the value of school-entry requirements for HPV vaccination. School-entry requirements should be considered alongside other initiatives and policies for promoting HPV vaccine uptake. Taking a comprehensive systems approach to HPV vaccination is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika L Thompson
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Systems, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Ellen M Daley
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Tricia Washburn
- Office of Immunization, State of Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Kim Salisbury-Keith
- Office of Immunization, State of Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Debbie Saslow
- Department of Cancer Control, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Holly B Fontenot
- School of Nursing and Dental Hygiene, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gioia SA, Russell MA, Zimet GD, Stupiansky NW, Rosenberger JG. The role of disclosure & perceptions about providers in health discussions among gay and bisexual young men. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:1712-1718. [PMID: 33451881 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Gay and bisexual men may feel discomfort discussing sensitive topics such as sexual behaviors and substance use with their health providers, which may prevent them from receiving important health information. This study investigates whether patients' perceptions of their provider's sexual orientation predicts patient-provider discussions of sexual and general health topics, and whether this relationship is moderated by patients' disclosure of sexual orientation to providers. METHODS Data were collected online from a sample of 576 gay and bisexual men living in the USA, aged 18-26. Adjusted risk ratios were estimated by using modified Poisson regression with robust error variance. RESULTS Participants who believed their providers were gay or bisexual were more likely to have discussed sexual health topics, but not general health topics; simple slopes analyses revealed that this effect was stronger among those who had not disclosed to their providers. Disclosure was also consistently associated with increased likelihood of discussing almost all topics. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight differences in communication based on disclosure and perceived sexual orientation of provider, suggesting the need to further explore how these differences influence young gay and bisexual men's health. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Dyads may be more likely to discuss sexual health topics when patients believe their providers are sexual minorities themselves. In addition, patient-provider dyads may be likelier to discuss various health topics when providers are aware of patients' sexual minority statuses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Gioia
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.
| | - Michael A Russell
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
| | - Nathan W Stupiansky
- Health Behavior Consultants International, 7575 E Indian Bend Rd, Scottsdale, AZ 85250, USA.
| | - Joshua G Rosenberger
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Walker KK, Head KJ, Owens H, Zimet GD. A qualitative study exploring the relationship between mothers' vaccine hesitancy and health beliefs with COVID-19 vaccination intention and prevention during the early pandemic months. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:3355-3364. [PMID: 34187310 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1942713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy is a top ten global health threat that can negatively impact COVID-19 vaccine uptake. It is assumed that vaccine refusers hold deep, negative beliefs, while acceptors hold strong, positive beliefs. However, vaccine hesitancy exists along a continuum and is multidimensional, varying by time, place, vaccine, subgroup, and person. Guided by the Health Belief Model and vaccine hesitancy frameworks, the study purpose was to qualitatively explore maternal COVID-19 threat perceptions and willingness to accept a COVID-19 vaccine in light of their expressed vaccine hesitancy toward past school required and routinely recommended vaccines and the HPV vaccine for their children. Researchers conducted twenty-five interviews with US Midwestern mothers during the early COVID-19 pandemic months. Mothers were grouped by vaccine hesitancy categories and thematic analysis was used to analyze the data within and across categories. Results showed that prior vaccine hesitancy attitudes and behavior did not fully capture maternal acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine or perception of COVID-19 threat. Perceptions of COVID-19 threat did influence mothers' decisions about COVID-19 protective behaviors (e.g., handwashing, mask wearing, and distancing). However, mothers were hesitant to accept the COVID-19 vaccine across vaccine hesitancy categories, primarily citing concerns about safety, efficacy, and confusion over conflicting information as barriers to immediate COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Findings indicate that mothers cannot be grouped together based on hesitancy about, or acceptance of, other vaccines for purposes of assuming COVID-19 preventive behavior adherence or anticipated COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly K Walker
- Zimmerman School of Advertising and Mass Communications, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Heather Owens
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Feemster KA, Head KJ, Panozzo CA, O'Dell SM, Zimet GD, Kornides ML. Efficacy of tailored messages to improve behavioral intent to accept HPV vaccination among mothers may be moderated by sociodemographics. Prev Med Rep 2021; 23:101413. [PMID: 34150474 PMCID: PMC8192722 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of a tailored video intervention differed by sociodemographics. Further research should evaluate interventions tailored by sociodemographics. Tailoring interventions by child age and other factors may improve efficacy.
We assessed differences in response to a tailored recommendation intervention for HPV vaccine by participants’ sociodemographic characteristics in this exploratory sub-analysis of a larger web-based, randomized-controlled trial on tailored messaging among mothers with low intent to vaccinate their 11–14-year-old child against HPV. The intervention consisted of pre-recorded video messages tailored to 1–5 common concerns about HPV vaccine. In these exploratory analyses, we used generalized linear models to assess differences in post-intervention intent across intervention arms, stratified by sociodemographic characteristics among 496 trial participants. We found significantly higher post-intervention intent in the intervention participants versus the control group among mothers: 1) with younger children; 2) with white vs. black children; 3) with Non-Hispanic children; 4) who were younger; 5) with some college or vocational training; with household incomes of ≥$100,000; and 7) with 1–2 children. Our findings of effect modification by certain sociodemographic factors such as age, race/ethnicity, and household income should be considered when designing similar tailored messaging interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen A Feemster
- Vaccine Education Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- Indiana University School of Liberal Arts, Department of Communication Studies, Cavanaugh Hall 307C, 425 University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | | | - Sean M O'Dell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 West 10 Street Suite 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Melanie L Kornides
- Department of Family & Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, 418 Curie Boulevard, Office 401, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Spinola SM, Zimet GD, Ott MA, Katz BP. Corrigendum to: Human Challenge Studies Are Unlikely to Accelerate Coronavirus Vaccine Licensure due to Ethical and Practical Issues. J Infect Dis 2021; 223:1837. [PMID: 33871610 PMCID: PMC8083306 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiab109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley M Spinola
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Mary A Ott
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Barry P Katz
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zimet GD, Silverman RD, Fortenberry JD. Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Vaccination of Children and Adolescents: Prospects and Challenges. J Pediatr 2021; 231:254-258. [PMID: 33161025 PMCID: PMC7644179 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,Reprint requests: Gregory D. Zimet, PhD, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10 St, HS 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202
| | - Ross D. Silverman
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN,Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, Indianapolis, IN
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zimet GD, Silverman RD, Bednarczyk RA, English A. Adolescent Consent for Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Ethical, Legal, and Practical Considerations. J Pediatr 2021; 231:24-30. [PMID: 33484694 PMCID: PMC8005441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
We address ethical, legal, and practical issues related to adolescent self-consent for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. HPV vaccination coverage continues to lag well behind the national goal of 80% series completion. Structural and behavioral interventions have improved vaccination rates, but attitudinal, behavioral, and access barriers remain. A potential approach for increasing access and improving vaccination coverage would be to permit adolescents to consent to HPV vaccination for themselves. We argue that adolescent self-consent is ethical, but that there are legal hurdles to be overcome in many states. In jurisdictions where self-consent is legal, there can still be barriers due to lack of awareness of the policy among healthcare providers and adolescents. Other barriers to implementation of self-consent include resistance from antivaccine and parent rights activists, reluctance of providers to agree to vaccinate even when self-consent is legally supported, and threats to confidentiality. Confidentiality can be undermined when an adolescent's self-consented HPV vaccination appears in an explanation of benefits communication sent to a parent or if a parent accesses an adolescent's vaccination record via state immunization information systems. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has led to a substantial drop in HPV vaccination, there may be even more reason to consider self-consent. The atmosphere of uncertainty and distrust surrounding future COVID-19 vaccines underscores the need for any vaccine policy change to be pursued with clear communication and consistent with ethical principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,Reprint requests: Gregory D. Zimet, PhD, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W 10th Street, HS 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202
| | - Ross D. Silverman
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health and Robert H. McKinney School of Law, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Robert A. Bednarczyk
- Hubert Department of Global Health and Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, and Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sturm L, Kasting ML, Head KJ, Hartsock JA, Zimet GD. Influenza vaccination in the time of COVID-19: A national U.S. survey of adults. Vaccine 2021; 39:1921-1928. [PMID: 33715898 PMCID: PMC7931729 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Decisions about influenza vaccination for fall-winter 2020 were made against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. During May 2020, the authors examined intended vaccination in the next 12 months in relationship to demographic variables, healthcare attitudes, and personal COVID-19 experiences for two samples of adults--those who did not receive influenza vaccine during the prior 12 months, and those who did. Methods In May 2020, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a national US sample. Participants reported prior influenza vaccination (yes/no during prior 12 months) and anticipated vaccination (yes/no during next 12 months). Covariates included demographic characteristics (e.g., gender, race-ethnicity, political ideology), general beliefs (e.g., benefits of vaccines, altruistic attitudes), and COVID-19 health beliefs and experiences (COVID-19 worry and severity, perception of COVID-19 as a community threat, knowing someone with COVID-19). For each group, hierarchical multivariable logistic regression was conducted with intent to vaccinate as the outcome. Results Among participants (n = 3502), 47% did not receive influenza vaccine in the prior 12 months and 53% had; 25.5% of non-vaccinators and 91.9% of vaccinators intended future vaccination. For non-vaccinators, odds of intending vaccination was associated with race/ethnicity (Hispanics were more likely to intend than white-NH; AOR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.23–2.4), greater perceived benefits of vaccination (AOR = 2.19; 95% CI = 1.88–2.54), and perception of COVID-19 as a community threat (AOR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.49–2.45). For vaccinators, odds of intending vaccination was associated with age (AOR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.03–1.05), race/ethnicity (Black-NH and Other-NH were less likely to intend than white-NH, AOR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.36–0.999; and AOR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.24–0.84, respectively), greater perceived benefits of vaccination (AOR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.45–2.45) and greater perception of collective benefits of vaccines (AOR = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.15–1.90). Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic may have served as a cue to action for influenza vaccination intention among some prior non-vaccinators whereas intention among prior vaccinators is more related to positive attitudes toward vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne Sturm
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Suite 3120 Riley Pediatric Care Center, 1002 Wishard Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Monica L Kasting
- Purdue University, Department of Public Health, Matthews Hall 216, 812 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
| | - Katharine J Head
- Indiana University, Purdue University Indianapolis, Department of Communication Studies, 307C Cavanaugh Hall, 425 University Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202 USA.
| | - Jane A Hartsock
- Indiana University Health, 1800 N. Capitol Ave., Noyes Pavilion Suite E644, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 410 W. 10th Street. Ste 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ravert RD, Fu LY, Zimet GD. Young Adults' COVID-19 Testing Intentions: The Role of Health Beliefs and Anticipated Regret. J Adolesc Health 2021; 68:460-463. [PMID: 33610234 PMCID: PMC7887449 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Young adults are at high risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and transmission due to their social behaviors. The purpose of this study was to determine their attitudes toward coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing, an important approach for minimizing infection and transmission. METHODS One hundred seventy eight US individuals aged 19-25 years completed an online survey measuring COVID-19 health beliefs and testing intentions. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of heath belief measures (perceived COVID-19 susceptibility, COVID-19 severity, barriers and benefits to testing, and social concerns) with testing intentions. RESULTS Most respondents (86.0%) intended to accept a COVID-19 test if recommended by a health professional. High social concern and low perceived obstacles were associated with intent to get tested. CONCLUSIONS In this sample, most young adults intended to accept COVID-19 testing. Health beliefs predicted testing intention and point to possible intervention approaches to increase willingness to accept COVID-19 testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell D Ravert
- Human Development & Family Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
| | - Linda Y Fu
- General and Community Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, Washington District of Columbia
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kasting ML, Head KJ, DeMaria AL, Neuman MK, Russell AL, Robertson SE, Rouse CE, Zimet GD. A National Survey of Obstetrician/Gynecologists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Regarding Adult Human Papillomavirus Vaccination. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2021; 30:1476-1484. [PMID: 33428518 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Many women see an obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN) annually and receive their primary care from an OB/GYN. Understanding OB/GYNs' human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination practices, including knowledge of and barriers to vaccination, is essential to design effective interventions to increase vaccination. This study evaluated OB/GYN knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding vaccinating both younger (18-26 years) and mid-adult (27-45 years) women. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from OB/GYN providers in October 2019 through a nationwide web-based survey. Items included the following: HPV-related vaccination practices, recommendation strength, knowledge (seven items), benefits (four items), and barriers (eight items). Results: The sample (n = 224) was majority were White (69%), men (56%), and practice in suburban clinics (55%). Most (84%) reported they usually or always recommend HPV vaccine to eligible patients, but estimated only about half (51%) of other OB/GYNs did the same. Recommendation strength varied by patient age with 84% strongly recommending it to patients ≤18 years, compared with 79% and 25% strongly recommending to younger and mid-adult patients, respectively (p < 0.01). Participants reported lower benefits (p = 0.007) and higher barriers (p < 0.001) for 27- to 45-year-old patients compared with younger patients. Cost was the most frequently reported barrier, regardless of patient age. Overall knowledge was high (m = 5.2/7) but 33% of participants did not know the vaccine was safe while breastfeeding. Conclusions: Although providers reported strongly and consistently recommending the HPV vaccination to their adult patients, there were gaps in knowledge and attitudinal barriers that need to be addressed. Provider performance feedback may be important in improving HPV vaccination awareness among providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica L Kasting
- Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.,Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Andrea L DeMaria
- Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Monica K Neuman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Allissa L Russell
- Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Sharon E Robertson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Caroline E Rouse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Spinola SM, Broderick C, Zimet GD, Ott MA. Human Challenge Studies With Wild-Type Severe Acute Respiratory Sydrome Coronavirus 2 Violate Longstanding Codes of Human Subjects Research. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020; 8:ofaa615. [PMID: 33506070 PMCID: PMC7798584 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
This manuscript explores the ethics of human inoculation experiments in young healthy adults with wild-type severe acute respiratory sydrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as a tool to evaluate vaccine efficacy in the context of the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Belmont Report, and in the context of dose-response relationships with infectious agents. Despite societal pressure to develop a SARS-CoV-2 challenge model to evaluate vaccines, we argue that there are substantial risks that cannot be adequately defined because the dose of SARS-CoV-2 that causes severe disease in young adults is unknown. In the absence of curative therapy, even if a volunteer consents, longstanding ethical codes governing human subjects research preclude the conduct of such experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley M Spinola
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Mary A Ott
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kasting ML, Head KJ, Hartsock JA, Sturm L, Zimet GD. Public perceptions of the effectiveness of recommended non-pharmaceutical intervention behaviors to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241662. [PMID: 33147261 PMCID: PMC7641367 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented public health threat, both in scope and response. With no vaccine available, the public is advised to practice non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) including social distancing, mask-wearing, and washing hands. However, little is known about public perceptions of the effectiveness of these measures, and high perceived effectiveness is likely to be critical in order to achieve widespread adoption of NPI. Methods In May 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among U.S. adults (N = 3,474). The primary outcome was a six-item measure assessing perceived effectiveness of recommended behaviors to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection from 1 (not at all effective) to 5 (extremely effective). The sample was divided into “higher” and “lower” perceived effectiveness groups. Covariates included demographics, healthcare characteristics, and health beliefs. Variables that were significant at p<0.01 in bivariate analyses were entered into a multivariable logistic regression and a best-fit model was created using a cutoff of p<0.01 to stay in the model. Results Mean age was 45.5 years and most participants were non-Hispanic White (63%) and female (52.4%). The high perceived effectiveness group was slightly larger than the low perceived effectiveness group (52.7% vs. 47.3%). Almost all health belief variables were significant in the best-fit regression model. COVID-19-related worry (aOR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.64–2.02), and perceived threat to physical health (aOR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.20–1.45) were positively associated with perceived effectiveness while perceived severity of COVID-19 (0.84; 95% CI = 0.73–0.96) and perceived likelihood of infection (0.85; 95% CI = 0.77–0.94) switched directions in the adjusted model and were negatively associated with perceived effectiveness. Conclusions This research indicates people generally believe NPI are effective, but there was variability based on health beliefs and there are mixed rates of engagement in these behaviors. Public health efforts should focus on increasing perceived severity and threat of SARS-CoV-2-related disease, while promoting NPI as effective in reducing threat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica L. Kasting
- Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Katharine J. Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Jane A. Hartsock
- Department of Clinical and Organizational Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
- Center for Bioethics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
- Medical Humanities & Health Studies Program, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Lynne Sturm
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Paykani T, Zimet GD, Esmaeili R, Khajedaluee AR, Khajedaluee M. Perceived social support and compliance with stay-at-home orders during the COVID-19 outbreak: evidence from Iran. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1650. [PMID: 33148209 PMCID: PMC7609821 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09759-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Strong evidence demonstrates that social support plays a key role in facilitating preventive health behaviors. The aim of the current study was to assess the effects of perceived social support on compliance with stay-at-home orders in response to a COVID-19 outbreak during the Persian New Year (Nowruz) holydays, since Nowruz holidays of 2020 coincided with the peak of the coronavirus epidemic in Iran. METHODS This cross-sectional survey was carried out based on phone interviews of 1073 adults aged over 18 years from 4 to 12 April 2020 in Mashhad, Khorasan-Razavi Province, as the second largest city of Iran. A systematic random sampling was carried out using fixed phone number lists provided by Telecommunication Company of Khorasan-Razavi Province. Phone interviews were carried out by trained interviewers from the Iranian Students Polling Agency (ISPA) at various times of the day. The survey included sociodemographic questions, perceived social support scale (MSPSS) and questions about self-isolation during the Nowruz holiday. Statistical analysis included Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS 20.5% of participants reported poor compliance with stay at home orders during the first 2 weeks of Nowruz. Clear social gradients were not found in stay-at-home compliance. When controlling socio-demographic factors, perceived social support, interestingly, both fostered and hindered people's compliance with stay at home orders, depending on the source of support from family members (OR = .874, 95% CI = .803, .950, p < .005), friends (OR = 1.147, 95% CI = 1.076, 1.222, p < .001) and a significant other person (OR = .926, 95% CI = .849, 1.010, p = .084). CONCLUSIONS Public health messaging may need to emphasize the role that friends and families can play in helping to protect those in their friendship/family groups by promoting compliance with social distancing. Further in-depth studies are recommended to evaluate how this kind of messaging can most effectively encourage people to engage in social distancing practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toktam Paykani
- Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Reza Esmaeili
- Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
| | | | - Mohammad Khajedaluee
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gilkey MB, Bednarczyk RA, Gerend MA, Kornides ML, Perkins RB, Saslow D, Sienko J, Zimet GD, Brewer NT. Getting Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Back on Track: Protecting Our National Investment in Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the COVID-19 Era. J Adolesc Health 2020; 67:633-634. [PMID: 32933839 PMCID: PMC7834295 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa B Gilkey
- Department of Health Behavior and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Robert A Bednarczyk
- Department of Global Health and Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mary A Gerend
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida
| | - Melanie L Kornides
- Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rebecca B Perkins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Debbie Saslow
- Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer Sienko
- Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Department of Health Behavior and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Spinola SM, Zimet GD, Ott MA, Katz BP. Human Challenge Studies Are Unlikely to Accelerate Coronavirus Vaccine Licensure Due to Ethical and Practical Issues. J Infect Dis 2020; 222:1572-1574. [PMID: 32845303 PMCID: PMC7499586 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley M Spinola
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Mary A Ott
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.,Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Barry P Katz
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Head KJ, Kasting ML, Sturm LA, Hartsock JA, Zimet GD. A National Survey Assessing SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Intentions: Implications for Future Public Health Communication Efforts. Sci Commun 2020; 42:698-723. [PMID: 38602991 PMCID: PMC7520657 DOI: 10.1177/1075547020960463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
With SARS-CoV-2 vaccines under development, research is needed to assess intention to vaccinate. We conducted a survey (N = 3,159) with U.S. adults in May 2020 assessing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intentions, intentions with a provider recommendation, and sociodemographic and psychosocial variables. Participants had high SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intentions (M = 5.23/7-point scale), which increased significantly with a provider recommendation (M = 5.47). Hierarchical linear regression showed that less education and working in health care were associated with lower intent, and liberal political views, altruism, and COVID-19-related health beliefs were associated with higher intent. This work can inform interventions to increase vaccine uptake, ultimately reducing COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine J Head
- Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Lynne A Sturm
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jane A Hartsock
- Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Szilagyi PG, Albertin CS, Gurfinkel D, Saville AW, Vangala S, Rice JD, Helmkamp L, Zimet GD, Valderrama R, Breck A, Rand CM, Humiston SG, Kempe A. Prevalence and characteristics of HPV vaccine hesitancy among parents of adolescents across the US. Vaccine 2020; 38:6027-6037. [PMID: 32758380 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While many clinicians encounter parents or adolescents who refuse HPV vaccine, little is known about the prevalence of hesitancy for HPV vaccine nationally or its association with vaccination. METHODS In April 2019, we surveyed families with adolescents 11-17 years using a national online panel (Knowledge Panel®) as the sampling frame. We assessed the prevalence of HPV vaccine hesitancy with the validated 9-item Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS). We used multivariate analyses to assess demographic factors associated with HPV vaccine hesitancy. We also assessed practical barriers to receipt of HPV vaccine and the relationship between barriers and hesitancy. Finally, we evaluated the association between both HPV vaccine hesitancy and practical barriers on HPV vaccine receipt or refusal. RESULTS 2,177 parents out of 4,185 sampled (52%) completed the survey, 2,020 qualified (lived with adolescent). Using a VHS cut-off score > 3 out of 5 points, 23% of US parents were hesitant about HPV vaccine. Hesitancy was lower among those with Hispanic ethnicity. At least one out of five parents disagreed that the HPV vaccine is beneficial for their adolescent, that the vaccine is effective, protects against HPV-related cancers, or that they followed their adolescent's health-care provider's recommendation about the vaccine. Many were concerned about vaccine side effects and the novelty of the vaccine. Adolescents living with vaccine-hesitant parents were less than one-third as likely to have received the vaccine (RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.24, 0.35) or completed the vaccine series (RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.23, 0.36), and were 6-fold more likely to have refused the vaccine because of parental vaccine-related concerns (RR = 6.09, 95% CI = 5.26, 7.04). Most practical barriers were independently associated with vaccine receipt but not with vaccine refusal. CONCLUSIONS HPV vaccine hesitancy is common nationally and strongly related to both under-vaccination and vaccine refusal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Szilagyi
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Christina S Albertin
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Dennis Gurfinkel
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Alison W Saville
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Sitaram Vangala
- Department of Medicine, Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - John D Rice
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Laura Helmkamp
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Rebecca Valderrama
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Abigail Breck
- Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Cynthia M Rand
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | | | - Allison Kempe
- Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wong LP, Wong PF, Megat Hashim MMAA, Han L, Lin Y, Hu Z, Zhao Q, Zimet GD. Multidimensional social and cultural norms influencing HPV vaccine hesitancy in Asia. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 16:1611-1622. [PMID: 32429731 PMCID: PMC7482900 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1756670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
HPV vaccine hesitancy in Asia is unique compared to Western countries due to multidimensional social-cultural norms that influence beliefs regarding vaccination. Reviews on HPV vaccine hesitancy in Asia lack of in-depth discussion regarding the traditional and social-cultural norms dimensions. This paper puts forward opinions in which culture, normative beliefs, and religion influence HPV vaccine hesitancy in Asian countries. Issues surrounding HPV hesitancy among parents, young adult women, adult women, men and the sexual and gender minority people in Asian countries were highlighted. The shortage of HPV vaccine supply would soon be reduced as some Asian countries are on the way to producing the HPV vaccine which production is currently dominated by Western European countries. The culture of favoring imported Western products among many in Asia and in addition to long-existing fake vaccine crisis pose a challenge for the newly emerging HPV vaccine produced in Asia. Some recommendations, research gaps, and future research needs were discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Ping Wong
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Pooi-Fong Wong
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Liyuan Han
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yulan Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Zhijian Hu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qinjian Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian Province, China
| | - Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, U.S
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Johnson NL, Head KJ, Scott SF, Zimet GD. Persistent Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: Knowledge and Sociodemographic Determinants of Papanicolaou and Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Women in the United States. Public Health Rep 2020; 135:483-491. [PMID: 32516053 DOI: 10.1177/0033354920925094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cervical cancer is the second-most common type of cancer among women aged 15-44, and racial, ethnic, and economic disparities exist in survival rates despite widely available screening tests and early treatment options. The objective of this study was to describe the association among knowledge, sociodemographic characteristics, and cervical cancer screening, with the goal of developing interventions to prevent cervical cancer in populations at risk of the disease. METHODS In 2017, we conducted a nationwide survey of women in the United States aged ≥18 who had ever received a Papanicolaou (Pap) test (N = 630). We conducted t tests and one-way analysis of variance to determine sociodemographic differences (age, education, race, ethnicity, income, type of health insurance) in knowledge about cervical cancer screening (Pap test and human papillomavirus [HPV] test). We used logistic regressions to define significant determinants of cervical cancer screening behaviors in the previous 5 years. RESULTS Of 629 respondents, 407 (64.7%) had an annual household income <$30 000, and 322 of 536 (60.1%) respondents had government-provided health insurance. Of 630 women who had ever had a Pap test, 425 (67.5%) had an HPV test. Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women were more likely than Hispanic and non-Hispanic black women (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49; 95% CI, 1.12-4.54; P = .02) and women with government-provided health insurance (OR = 1.91; 95% CI, 1.08-3.37; P = .03) were more likely than women with private health insurance to have received a Pap test in the previous 5 years. Knowledge of HPV was a significant predictor of having received an HPV test in the previous 5 years (OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.22-1.54; P < .001). CONCLUSION Disparities in cervical cancer screening among sociodemographic groups of women suggest the need for targeted interventions to improve knowledge about Pap and HPV tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole L Johnson
- 10668 Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- 10668 Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Gregory D Zimet
- 10668 Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Head KJ, Johnson NL, Scott SF, Zimet GD. Communicating Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Light of New Guidelines: Clinical Practices at Federally Qualified Health Centers. Health Commun 2020; 35:815-821. [PMID: 30945950 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1593079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
New guidelines for cervical cancer screening (CCS) incorporate both HPV and Pap tests, and there is a need to understand communication of these cotesting results to patients, especially in at-risk populations disproportionally affected by cervical cancer. This study used computer-assisted telephone interviews in 2017 at 51 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Indiana to evaluate the characteristics of clinical communication CCS results to women. Results revealed that clinical communication practices varied on channel, timing, and content. Almost half of the clinics (n = 23, 45%) communicate results to patients by phone. Most clinics (n = 47, 92%) notify patients of results in two weeks or less. For cotesting, 70% (n = 36) always communicate Pap/HPV results at the same time. The majority of clinics (n = 42, 82%) explain the type of abnormal Pap test, while only 43% (n = 22) discuss the cervical cancer risk as indicated by the HPV test result. Even though 98% (n = 48) of participants rated their communication strategy as effective, qualitatively participants acknowledged difficulties in communicating cotesting results with their often transient and low health literate patients populations. These results indicate considerable variation and potential deficits in clinical communication of cotesting results in FQHCs, but several promising communication strategies were identified that may inform improved screening communication for other clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
| | - Nicole L Johnson
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
| | - Susanna Foxworthy Scott
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lin Y, Su Z, Chen F, Zhao Q, Zimet GD, Alias H, He S, Hu Z, Wong LP. Chinese mothers' intention to vaccinate daughters against human papillomavirus (HPV), and their vaccine preferences: a study in Fujian Province. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 17:304-315. [PMID: 32401617 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1756152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Little is known regarding Chinese mothers' intention to vaccinate their daughters against human papillomavirus (HPV) since the HPV vaccine was approved for use in China in 2016. The aim was to explore maternal HPV vaccination acceptance, preference for 2-, 4- or 9-valent HPV vaccine and acceptance of domestically manufactured HPV vaccines. Study participants were mothers of primary school children in Southeastern region of Fujian. An online cross-sectional survey was undertaken between June and August 2019. Among the total of 3,586 completed responses (response rate 28.5%), the intention to vaccinate daughter against HPV was high (83.3%). Higher maternal education and perceived benefit and barriers were associated with greater intention to vaccinate. Among mothers who did not intend to vaccinate their daughters, the three most common reasons were daughter being too young to receive HPV vaccination (40.6%), fear of side effects (31.9%) and vaccine price is too high (16.0%). The largest proportion (41.4%) preferred their daughter to be vaccinated with the 9-valent HPV vaccine (9vHPV). Greater preference for 9vHPVwas strongly associated with higher maternal education level and annual household income. The majority of mothers expressed a preference for imported HPV vaccine (56.3%). Our result indicates that lower intentions to vaccinate daughters against HPV among less educated and lower-income mothers may lead to significant social inequalities in HPV vaccine uptake in the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulan Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University , Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zhitai Su
- Yongding Health Inspection Bureau , Longyan City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Fulian Chen
- Longyan Health Inspection Bureau , Longyan City, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qinjian Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xiamen University , Xiamen, Fujian, PR China
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University , Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Haridah Alias
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Shuqiong He
- Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Fujian Provincial Maternity andChildren's Hospital of Fujian Medical University , Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Zhijian Hu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Environment Factors and Cancer, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University , Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Li Ping Wong
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pushkarev GS, Zimet GD, Kuznetsov VA, Yaroslavskaya EI. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Reliability and Validity of Russian Version. Clin Gerontol 2020; 43:331-339. [PMID: 30587089 DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2018.1558325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To assess factorial and construct validity along with reliability of the Russian version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) in cardiac patients.Methods: The study included 1018 patients with coronary artery disease. All patients were offered the opportunity to complete a questionnaire to detect psychosocial risk and protective factors, including the MSPSS.Results: Internal consistency of the Russian version of the MSPSS was high: Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the group of patients with stable angina was .91 vs. .90 in the group with acute coronary syndrome. The three-factor structure of the MSPSS was proved with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. As expected, the Russian version of the MSPSS was negatively correlated with measures of anxiety and depression, and positively correlated with curiosity.Conclusions: The Russian version of MSPSS corresponds closely with the English version in reliability, consistency, and internal structure. Test-retest reliability was satisfactorally high and construct validity was supported with the results of the correlation analysis.Clinical Implications: Our study confirms that MSPSS questionnaire is a high valid tool to estimate social support and it can be successfully applied to define social support in patients with cardiac pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G S Pushkarev
- Tyumen Cardiology Research Center, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
| | - G D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| | - V A Kuznetsov
- Tyumen Cardiology Research Center, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
| | - E I Yaroslavskaya
- Tyumen Cardiology Research Center, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Knopf A, Ott MA, Draucker CB, Fortenberry JD, Reirden DH, Arrington-Sanders R, Schneider J, Straub D, Baker R, Bakoyannis G, Zimet GD. Innovative Approaches to Obtain Minors' Consent for Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials: Multi-Site Quasi-Experimental Study of Adolescent and Parent Perspectives. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e16509. [PMID: 32224493 PMCID: PMC7154935 DOI: 10.2196/16509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Revised: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the high burden of new HIV infections in minor adolescents, they are often excluded from biomedical HIV prevention trials, largely owing to the ethical complexities of obtaining consent for enrollment. Researchers and ethics regulators have a duty to protect adolescents-as a special category of human subjects, they must have protection that extends beyond those afforded to all human subjects. Typically, additional protection includes parental consent for enrollment. However, parental consent can present a risk of harm for minor adolescents. Research involving minor adolescents indicate that they are unwilling to join biomedical trials for stigmatized health problems, such as HIV, when parental consent is required. This presents a significant barrier to progress in adolescent HIV prevention by creating delays in research and the translation of new scientific evidence generated in biomedical trials in adult populations. OBJECTIVE This protocol aims to examine how parental involvement in the consent process affects the acceptability of hypothetical participation in biomedical HIV prevention trials from the perspectives of minor adolescents and parents of minor adolescents. METHODS In this protocol, we use a quasi-experimental design that involves a simulated consent process for 2 different HIV prevention trials. The first trial is modeled after an open-label study of the use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine as preexposure prophylaxis for HIV. The second trial is modeled after a phase IIa trial of an injectable HIV integrase inhibitor. There are 2 groups in the study-minor adolescents aged 14 to 17 years, inclusive, and parents of minor adolescents in the same age range. The adolescent participants are randomized to 1 of 3 consent conditions with varying degrees of parental involvement. After undergoing a simulated consent process, they rate their willingness to participate (WTP) in each of the 2 trials if offered the opportunity. The primary outcome is WTP, given the consent condition. Parents undergo a similar process but are asked to rate the acceptability of each of the 3 consent conditions. The primary outcome is acceptability of the consent method for enrollment. The secondary outcomes include the following: capacity to consent among both participant groups, the prevalence of medical mistrust, and the effects of the study phase (eg, phase IIa vs the open-label study) and drug administration route (eg, oral vs injection) on WTP (adolescents) and acceptability (parents) of the consent method. RESULTS Enrollment began in April 2018 and ended mid-September 2019. Data are being analyzed and dissemination is expected in April 2020. CONCLUSIONS The study will provide the needed empirical data about minor adolescents' and parents' perspectives on consent methods for minors. The evidence generated can be used to guide investigators and ethics regulators in the design of consent processes for biomedical HIV prevention trials. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/16509.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Knopf
- Department of Community & Health Services, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Mary A Ott
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Claire Burke Draucker
- Department of Community & Health Services, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - J Dennis Fortenberry
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Daniel H Reirden
- Children's Hospital Colorado, School of Medicine, The University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Renata Arrington-Sanders
- Division of General Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - John Schneider
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Diane Straub
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Rebecca Baker
- Department of Community & Health Services, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Giorgos Bakoyannis
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory D Zimet
- a Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University , Indianapolis , IN , USA
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- b Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Saint Louis University , St Louis , MO , USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
You D, Han L, Li L, Hu J, D. Zimet G, Alias H, Danaee M, Cai L, Zeng F, Wong LP. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Uptake and the Willingness to Receive the HPV Vaccination among Female College Students in China: A Multicenter Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8:E31. [PMID: 31963370 PMCID: PMC7157221 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8010031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake and willingness to receive HPV vaccination among female college students, in China, and its associated factors. METHODS An online cross-sectional survey of female college students across the eastern, central, and western regions of China was undertaken between April and September 2019. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to examine factors associated with the HPV vaccine uptake and willingness to receive the HPV vaccine. RESULTS Among the total 4220 students who participated in this study, 11.0% reported having been vaccinated against HPV. There are direct effects of indicators of higher socioeconomic status, older age (β = 0.084 and p = 0.006), and geographical region (residing in Eastern China, β = 0.033, and p = 0.024) on HPV vaccine uptake. Higher knowledge (β = 0.062 and p < 0.000) and perceived susceptibility (β = 0.043 and p = 0.002) were also predictors of HPV vaccine uptake. Of those who had not received the HPV vaccine, 53.5% expressed a willingness to do so. Likewise, social economic status indicators were associated with the willingness to receive the HPV vaccine. Total knowledge score (β = 0.138 and p < 0.001), both perceived susceptibility (β = 0.092 and p < 0.001) and perceived benefit (β = 0.088 and p < 0.001), and sexual experience (β = 0.041 and p = 0.007) had a positive and significant direct effect on the willingness to receive the HPV vaccine, while perceived barriers (β = -0.071 and p < 0.001) had a negative effect on the willingness to receive the HPV vaccine. CONCLUSIONS Geographical region and socioeconomic disparities in the HPV vaccination uptake rate and willingness to receive the HPV vaccine provide valuable information for public health planning that aims to improve vaccination rates in underserved areas in China. The influence of knowledge and perceptions of HPV vaccination suggests the importance of communication for HPV immunization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dingyun You
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650500, China;
| | - Liyuan Han
- Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315200, China; (L.H.); (L.L.); (J.H.)
| | - Lian Li
- Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315200, China; (L.H.); (L.L.); (J.H.)
| | - Jingcen Hu
- Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315200, China; (L.H.); (L.L.); (J.H.)
| | - Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W, 10th St., HS 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA;
| | - Haridah Alias
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia; (H.A.); (M.D.)
| | - Mahmoud Danaee
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia; (H.A.); (M.D.)
| | - Le Cai
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650500, China;
| | - Fangfang Zeng
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
| | - Li Ping Wong
- Department of Epidemiology, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315200, China; (L.H.); (L.L.); (J.H.)
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia; (H.A.); (M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Thompson EL, Galvin AM, Daley EM, Tatar O, Zimet GD, Rosberger Z. Recent changes in cervical cancer screening guidelines: U.S. women's willingness for HPV testing instead of Pap testing. Prev Med 2020; 130:105928. [PMID: 31756351 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening guidelines in the United States were revised in 2018 to include the option of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. The transition to this screening method may face difficulties as Pap testing has been the primary screening modality in the United States. The objective of this study is to assess information, motivation, and behavioral skills associated with willingness to receive an HPV test instead of a Pap test among women. The sample included U.S. 812 women, ages 30 to 65 years. Participants completed an online survey in 2018. The Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills (IMB) model was used to measure predictors of willingness for HPV testing. The outcome variables were willingness to receive the HPV test instead of the Pap test, with and without time interval details. Logistic regression modeling was used with SAS 9.4. Over half of the sample (55%) were willing to receive the HPV test. For the information domain, HPV knowledge was significantly associated with willingness for HPV testing (OR = 1.08, 95%CI 1.04-1.13). Significant motivating factors included: positive attitudes, social norms, perceived benefits, worry about cervical cancer, and worry about abnormal HPV tests. For behavioral skills, women were significantly more willing to get the HPV test if a provider recommended it (OR = 2.43, 95%CI 1.53-3.87) and currently up-to-date on cervical cancer screening guidelines (OR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.52-2.26). Addressing barriers and facilitators to willingness to transition to primary HPV testing over Pap testing is needed as the United States has updated guidelines for cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika L Thompson
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
| | - Annalynn M Galvin
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Ellen M Daley
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ovidiu Tatar
- Research Center-Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Departments of Oncology, Psychology, & Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Discrete choice experiments (DCE), conjoint analysis (CA), and best-worst scaling (BWS) are quantitative techniques for estimating consumer preferences for products or services. These methods are increasingly used in healthcare research, but their applications within the field of HIV research have not yet been described. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically map the extent and nature of published DCE, CA, and BWS studies in the field of HIV and identify priority areas where these methods can be used in the future. Online databases were searched to identify published HIV-related DCE, CA and BWS studies in any country and year as the primary outcome. After screening 1,496 citations, 57 studies were identified that were conducted in 26 countries from 2000-2017. The frequency of published studies increased over time and covered HIV themes relating to prevention (n = 25), counselling and testing (n = 10), service delivery (n = 10), and antiretroviral therapy (n = 12). Most studies were DCEs (63%) followed by CA (37%) and BWS (4%). The median [IQR] sample size was 288 [138-496] participants, and 74% of studies used primary qualitative data to develop attributes. Only 30% of studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa where the burden of HIV is highest. Moreover, few studies surveyed key populations including men who have sex with men, transgender people, pregnant and postpartum women, adolescents, and people who inject drugs. These populations represent priorities for future stated-preference research. This scoping review can help researchers, policy makers, program implementers, and health economists to better understand the various applications of stated-preference research methods in the field of HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M. Humphrey
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Violet Naanyu
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya
- AMPATH Program, Eldoret, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya
| | - Katherine R. MacDonald
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Kara Wools-Kaloustian
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Gregory D. Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|