Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment

On December 5, 2022, an indirect drive fusion implosion on the National Ignition Facility (NIF) achieved a target gain G_{target} of 1.5. This is the first laboratory demonstration of exceeding "scientific breakeven" (or G_{target}>1) where 2.05 MJ of 351 nm laser light produced 3.1 MJ of total fusion yield, a result which significantly exceeds the Lawson criterion for fusion ignition as reported in a previous NIF implosion [H. Abu-Shawareb et al. (Indirect Drive ICF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 075001 (2022)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.129.075001]. This achievement is the culmination of more than five decades of research and gives proof that laboratory fusion, based on fundamental physics principles, is possible. This Letter reports on the target, laser, design, and experimental advancements that led to this result.

Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment

For more than half a century, researchers around the world have been engaged in attempts to achieve fusion ignition as a proof of principle of various fusion concepts. Following the Lawson criterion, an ignited plasma is one where the fusion heating power is high enough to overcome all the physical processes that cool the fusion plasma, creating a positive thermodynamic feedback loop with rapidly increasing temperature. In inertially confined fusion, ignition is a state where the fusion plasma can begin "burn propagation" into surrounding cold fuel, enabling the possibility of high energy gain. While "scientific breakeven" (i.e., unity target gain) has not yet been achieved (here target gain is 0.72, 1.37 MJ of fusion for 1.92 MJ of laser energy), this Letter reports the first controlled fusion experiment, using laser indirect drive, on the National Ignition Facility to produce capsule gain (here 5.8) and reach ignition by nine different formulations of the Lawson criterion.

A Multicenter Prospective Registry Study of Lung Transplant Recipients Hospitalized with COVID-19

Purpose

Outcomes of lung transplant recipients (LTR) hospitalized for COVID-19 and comparisons to non-lung solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) are incompletely described.

Methods

Using a multicenter prospective registry of SOTR, we examined 28-day outcomes (mortality [primary outcome], intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and bacterial pneumonia) among both LTR and non-lung SOTR hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between March 1, 2020 and September 21, 2020. Data were analyzed using Stata (StataCorp, College Station, TX); chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for mortality.

Results

The cohort included 72 LTR and 392 non-lung SOTR (Table 1). Overall, 28-day mortality trended higher in LTR vs. non-lung SOTR (27.8% vs. 19.9%, P=0.136). Other 28-day outcomes were similar between LTR and non-lung SOTR: ICU admission (45.8% vs. 39.1%, P=0.28), mechanical ventilation (32.9% vs. 31.1%, P=0.78), and bacterial pneumonia (15.3% vs. 8.2%, P=0.063). Congestive heart failure, diabetes, age >65 years, and obesity (BMI >= 30) were independently associated with mortality in non-lung SOTR, but not in LTR (Table 2).

Conclusion

In this large prospective cohort comparing lung and non-lung SOTR hospitalized for COVID-19, there were high but not significantly different rates of short-term morbidity and mortality. Baseline comorbidities appeared to drive mortality in non-lung SOTR but not LTR. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors for mortality among LTR.

[Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension Using the Example of Collagenosis-associated PAH in the Context of Chronic Lung and Left Heart Disease]

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) can be diagnosed in the context of connective tissue diseases (CTD) as well as in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. A correct clinical differential diagnosis and classification is essential before adequate therapeutic decisions can be made. Differential diagnosis of PH in CTD comprises associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (APAH), group 2 or 3 PH (PH arising from left heart or chronic lung disease), chronic thromboembolic PH (PH) and group 5 (e. g. in the context of terminal renal insufficiency). This is also true of elderly patients in whom the decision has to be made if the increasing number of coincident diseases lead to PH or have to be interpreted as comorbidities. In this manuscript, the differential diagnosis of PH is elucidated, focusing on CTD, in the context of left heart disease and chronic lung disease. Furthermore, criteria are presented facilitating an objective approach in this context.

[Current Aspects of Definition and Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension]

At the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH), which took place from February 27 until March 1, 2018 in Nice, scientific progress over the past 5 years in the field of pulmonary hypertension (PH) was presented by 13 working groups. The results of the discussion were published as proceedings towards the end of 2018. One of the major changes suggested by the WSPH was the lowering of the diagnostic threshold for PH from ≥ 25 to > 20 mmHg mean pulmonary arterial pressure, measured by right heart catheterization at rest. In addition, the pulmonary vascular resistance was introduced into the definition of PH, which underlines the importance of cardiac output determination at the diagnostic right heart catheterization.In this article, we discuss the rationale and possible consequences of a changed PH definition in the context of the current literature. Further, we provide a current overview on non-invasive and invasive methods for diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and prognosis of PH, including exercise tests.

Functional outcomes and quality of life during long-term follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism: analysis of the prospective multicentre FOCUS study

Background

It is unclear to which extent persistence of symptoms and/or residual haemodynamic impairment clinical course of pulmonary embolism are associated with worse quality of life (QoL).

Aims

To study the correlation between symptoms and haemodynamic impairment with QoL during the first year after acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

Methods

The Follow-Up after acute pulmonary embolism (FOCUS) study prospectively enrolled and followed consecutive adult patients diagnosed with acute symptomatic objectively diagnosed PE. In the present analysis, we considered patients who completed the Pulmonary Embolism QoL (PEmb-QoL) Questionnaire at predefined visits 3 and 12 months after acute PE. The PEmb-QoL score ranges from 0% (best QoL) to 100% (worst QoL). We evaluated at these two time points the correlation between persisting symptoms (group: symptoms), elevation of natriuretic peptides or residual right ventricular dysfunction (group: RVD), or their combination (group: symptoms + RVD) and QoL.

Results

A total of 617 patients were included; their median age was 62 years, 44% were women; 8% had active cancer, and 21% previous venous thromboembolism. At 3 months, patients with neither symptoms nor RVD (n=302) had the highest quality of life (median score 18%, 25th–75th percentile: 8%–34%), followed by those without symptoms but with RVD (n=255; median score 19%, 25th–75th percentile: 7%–34%), and by those with symptoms only (n=131; median PEmb-QoL 31%, 25th–75th percentile: 18%–49%). Patients with both symptoms and RVD (n=170) had the worst quality of life (median score 38%, 25th–75th percentile: 19%–53%); Figure 1A. At 12 months, we found an overall improvement of PEmb-QoL score. The degree of this QoL improvement varied across groups, being largest for patients who recovered from having symptoms + RVD at 3 months to normalization of at least one at 12 months. The change in QoL from 3 to 12 months was smaller both in patients who had neither symptoms nor RVD and in patients who had no recovery in either symptoms or RVD; Figure 1B.

Conclusions

Persistent symptoms after PE, especially in patients with elevated biomarkers or residual echocardiographic dysfunction, were the main drivers of QoL at 3 months as well as of the course of QoL over time.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

[Expert Workshop COPD: Lungs and Heart - Quite Often Ill Together]

When caring for patients with respiratory diseases, always think of the heart! This is especially important for COPD patients, but also for a variety of other disorders of the respiratory system. At the workshop "Luftschlösser", held once more at Wiesbaden, Germany in February 2019 the many and important interactions of the lungs and the heart as well as the therapeutic implications were discussed. Based on pathophysiology, the psycho-social consequences of dyspnea, the leading symptom in patients with lung and heart disease became apparent. A particularly demanding diagnostic and therapeutic situation occurs in patients suffering simultaneously of lung and heart disease. It has been shown how frequently the diagnosis myocardial infarction is missed in COPD patients - and vice versa. Surprisingly, this is also the case in asthmatics with coronary heart disease or heart failure, a fact not readily known in clinical practice. In patients with emphysema and no apparent heart disease, hyperinflation leads to significantly restricted heart function. Reducing hyperinflation by inhaling broncholytics thus improves heart function. Biomarkers are increasingly being used for diagnostic purposes. Their role is being investigated in the large German COPD cohort COSYCONET. Lung patients suffering from more severe heart diseases pose a challenge for therapy in intensive care, especially when ventilated, and weaning from the ventilator is prolonged. Lung vessel diseases are "classic" examples of the intimate interaction of the lungs and the heart. In pulmonary arterial hypertension as well as in chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertension the lag time between the first symptoms and the definite diagnosis is often unacceptably long. For both diseases of the lung vessels therapeutic options have improved significantly over the last years. Pulmonologists should take care of this increasingly important patient group. Sleep-related breathing disorders and heart function are closely intertwined. Both conditions need special attention after the results of the SERVE-HF trial have been published. But there is no doubt that obstructive sleep apnea represents an independent and important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and needs to be treated according to existing guidelines.This workshop demonstrated impressively the multiple interactions of the respiratory system with cardiac function, resulting diagnostic and therapeutic problems, and means to overcome these problems. Guidelines for respiratory diseases should appropriately address cardiac comorbidity.

[CF Lung Disease - a German S3 Guideline: Module 2: Diagnostics and Treatment in Chronic Infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa]

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is the most common autosomal-recessive genetic disease affecting approximately 8000 people in Germany. The disease is caused by mutations in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene leading to dysfunction of CFTR, a transmembrane chloride channel. This defect causes insufficient hydration of the epithelial lining fluid which leads to chronic inflammation of the airways. Recurrent infections of the airways as well as pulmonary exacerbations aggravate chronic inflammation, lead to pulmonary fibrosis and tissue destruction up to global respiratory insufficiency, which is responsible for the mortality in over 90 % of patients. The main aim of pulmonary treatment in CF is to reduce pulmonary inflammation and chronic infection. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) is the most relevant pathogen in the course of CF lung disease. Colonization and chronic infection are leading to additional loss of pulmonary function. There are many possibilities to treat Pa-infection. This is a S3-clinical guideline which implements a definition for chronic Pa-infection and demonstrates evidence-based diagnostic methods and medical treatment for Pa-infection in order to give guidance for individual treatment options.

[Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Recommendations of the Cologne Consensus Conference 2016]

The 2015 European Guidelines on Pulmonary Hypertension did not cover only pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), but also other significant subgroups of pulmonary hypertension (PH). In June 2016, a Consensus Conference organized by the PH working groups of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK), the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP) and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) was held in Cologne, Germany to discuss open and controversial issues surrounding the practical implementation of the European Guidelines. Several working groups were initiated, one of which was dedicated to the diagnosis and treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). In every patient with PH of unknown cause CTEPH should be excluded. The primary treatment option is surgical pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in a specialized multidisciplinary CTEPH center. Inoperable patients or patients with persistent or recurrent CTEPH after PEA are candidates for targeted drug therapy. For balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), there is currently only limited experience. This option - as PEA - is reserved to specialized centers with expertise for this treatment method. In addition, a brief overview is given on pulmonary artery sarcoma, since its surgical treatment is often analogous to PEA. The recommendations of this working group are summarized in the present paper.

[Clinical classification and initial diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension: recommendations of the Cologne Consensus Conference 2016]

The 2015 European Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension are also valid for Germany. The guidelines contain detailed information about the clinical classification and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension, and furthermore provide novel recommendations for risk stratification and follow-up assessments. However, the practical implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany requires the consideration of several country-specific issues and already existing novel data. This requires a detailed commentary to the guidelines, and in some aspects an update already appears necessary. In June 2016, a Consensus Conference organized by the PH working groups of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK), the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP) and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology (DGPK) was held in Cologne, Germany. This conference aimed to solve practical and controversial issues surrounding the implementation of the European Guidelines in Germany. To this end, a number of working groups was initiated, one of which was specifically dedicated to the clinical classification and initial diagnosis of PH. This article summarizes the results and recommendations of this working group.

[Dyspnoea in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) - a Survey in Spezialized German PH Centres]

Dyspnoea is the predominant symptom in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) at diagnosis. However, since dyspnoea is nonspecific and often occurs in a number of common diseases, the presence of PH can easily be underdiagnosed.In addition, this symptom underlies a high variability in the subjective perception, therefore further diagnostic procedures are often delayed by the patients.A survey of the incidence and severity of dyspnoea in 372 patients with PAH was conducted by questionnaire in German centres. Age, sex distribution and the range of comorbidities corresponded to the findings of national and international registries.Approximately 99 % of patients reported the presence of dyspnoea on exertion, even at low loads.Remarkably, in 13 % of patients dyspnoea occurs as a paroxysmal symptom, which may lead to the differential diagnosis of bronchial asthma. In addition, the patients who were being followed in specialized PH centres reported an increase in dyspnoea during the last year.The results of the survey on the incidence of dyspnoea in patients with PAH are consistent with the findings of international studies.

[Riociguat: stimulator of soluble guanylate-cyclase. New mode of action for the treatment of pulmonary arterial and non operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension]

Riociguat is the first clinically available soluble Guanylate-cyclase stimulator (sGC) and representative of a completely new class of drugs. Riociguat is approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and non-operable or recurrent/persistent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Moreover, Riociguat is currently under investigation for a wider spectrum of diseases. This article focusses on its mode of action and clinical trial data. Finally, based on these data, the status of approval, as well as the costs a proposal is given how Riociguat can be integrated in the current treatment of PAH and CTEPH.