1
|
Clerke T, Margetts J, Donovan H, Shepherd HL, Makris A, Canty A, Ruhotas A, Catling C, Henry A. Piloting a shared decision-making clinician training intervention in maternity care in Australia: A mixed methods study. Midwifery 2023; 126:103828. [PMID: 37717344 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM Implementation of woman-centred care in evidence-based maternity practice requires clinicians to be skilled in shared decision-making, yet there is limited training or research into such interventions. BACKGROUND Shared decision-making enables women to make informed decisions in partnership with clinicians where there are varied clinical options in relation to indications for and timing of planned birth. AIM We aimed to develop a shared decision-making training intervention and evaluate its feasibility and acceptability to midwives and obstetricians. METHODS The intervention was co-designed by midwifery and medical clinician-researchers, and a consumer representative. Online training and demonstration videos were distributed to midwives and obstetricians in three Sydney hospitals, followed by two online workshops in 2021 and 2022 where participants practised shared decision-making in roleplaying scenarios tailored to timing of birth. Training was evaluated using post-workshop and post-training surveys and semi-structured qualitative interviews. FINDINGS The training workshop format, duration and content were well received. Barriers to the uptake of shared decision-making were time, paternalistic practices and fear of repercussions of centring women in the decision-making process. DISCUSSION The intervention enabled midwifery and medical colleagues to learn communication repertoires from each other in woman-centred discussions around timing of birth. Roleplay scenarios enabled participants to observe and provide feedback on their colleagues' shared decision-making practices, while providing a space for collective reflection on ways to promote, and mitigate barriers to, its implementation in practice. CONCLUSION Shared decision-making training supports maternity clinicians in developing skills that implement woman-centred care in the timing of planned birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teena Clerke
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), Australia; University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Australia.
| | - Jayne Margetts
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), Australia; University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Australia
| | - Helen Donovan
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), Australia; University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Australia
| | - Angela Makris
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), Australia; University of New South Wales, Australia; Liverpool Hospital, South West Sydney Local Health District, Australia; Western Sydney University, Women's Health Initiative Translation Unit (WHITU), Australia
| | - Alison Canty
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), Australia; Liverpool Hospital, South West Sydney Local Health District, Australia; Western Sydney University, Women's Health Initiative Translation Unit (WHITU), Australia
| | - Annette Ruhotas
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), Australia
| | - Christine Catling
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), Australia; University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Australia
| | - Amanda Henry
- Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and Enterprise (SPHERE), Australia; University of New South Wales, Australia; St George Hospital, South East Sydney Local Health District, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Faris MM, Shepherd HL, Butow PN, Kelly P, He S, Rankin N, Masya L, Shaw J. Staff- and service-level factors associated with organisational readiness to implement a clinical pathway for the identification, assessment, and management of anxiety and depression in adults with cancer. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:866. [PMID: 37582818 PMCID: PMC10426102 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09829-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organisational readiness is recognised as a key factor impacting the successful translation of research findings into practice. Within psycho-oncology, measuring organisational readiness and understanding factors impacting organisational readiness is crucial as it is often challenging to implement evidence-based findings into routine cancer care. In this quantitative study, we examined the level of organisational readiness of cancer services preparing to implement a clinical pathway for the screening, assessment, and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (the ADAPT CP) within a cluster randomised controlled trial and sought to identify staff- and service-level factors associated with organisational readiness. METHODS Multidisciplinary staff across 12 Australian cancer services were identified. Their perceptions of their services' readiness to implement the ADAPT CP in the cancer stream or treatment modality selected within their service was assessed prior to implementation using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change scale. Data collection included staff demographic and professional characteristics, and their perception of the ADAPT CP using a set of 13 study-specific survey items. Service characteristics were captured using a site profile audit form and workflows during site engagement. RESULTS Fourteen staff- and service-level factors were identified as potentially impacting organisational readiness. To identify factors that best explained organisational readiness, separate univariate analyses were conducted for each factor, followed by a backward elimination regression. Compared to services that implemented the ADAPT CP in one treatment modality, those opting for four treatment modalities had significantly higher organisational readiness scores. Staff in administrative/technical support/non-clinical roles had significantly higher organisational readiness scores compared to psychosocial staff. Higher organisational readiness scores were also significantly related to more positive perceptions of the ADAPT CP. CONCLUSIONS Readiness to implement an anxiety and depression clinical pathway within 12 oncology services was high. This may be attributed to the extensive engagement with services prior to implementation. The factors associated with organisational readiness highlight the importance of ensuring adequate resourcing and supporting staff to implement change, effectively communicating the value of the change, and taking a whole-of-service approach to implementing the change. Future longitudinal studies may identify factors associated with ongoing readiness and engagement prior to implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION The ADAPT RCT was registered prospectively with the ANZCTR on 22/03/2017. Trial ID ACTRN12617000411347. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372486&isReview=true .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona M Faris
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Patrick Kelly
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Sharon He
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Nicole Rankin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Lindy Masya
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Butow P, Faris MM, Shaw J, Kelly P, He S, Harris M, Cuddy J, Masya L, Geerligs L, Kelly B, Girgis A, Rankin N, Beale P, Hack TF, Kirsten L, Dhillon H, Grimison P, Viney R, Clayton JM, Schlub T, Shepherd HL. Effect of core versus enhanced implementation strategies on adherence to a clinical pathway for managing anxiety and depression in cancer patients in routine care: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci 2023; 18:18. [PMID: 37217928 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01269-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal strategies to facilitate implementation of evidence-based clinical pathways are unclear. We evaluated two implementation strategies (Core versus Enhanced) to facilitate implementation of a clinical pathway for the management of anxiety and depression in cancer patients (the ADAPT CP). METHODS Twelve cancer services in NSW Australia were cluster randomised, stratified by service size, to the Core versus Enhanced implementation strategy. Each strategy was in place for 12 months, facilitating uptake of the ADAPT CP (the intervention being implemented). The Core strategy included a lead team with champions, staff training and awareness campaigns prior to implementation, plus access to feedback reports and telephone or online support during implementation. The Enhanced strategy included all Core supports plus monthly lead team meetings, and proactive, ongoing advice on managing barriers, staff training and awareness campaigns throughout implementation. All patients at participating sites were offered the ADAPT CP as part of routine care, and if agreeable, completed screening measures. They were allocated a severity step for anxiety/depression from one (minimal) to five (severe) and recommended management appropriate to their severity step. Multi-level mixed-effect regression analyses examined the effect of Core versus Enhanced implementation strategy on adherence to the ADAPT CP (binary primary outcome: adherent ≥ 70% of key ADAPT CP components achieved versus non-adherent < 70%), with continuous adherence as a secondary outcome. Interaction between study arm and anxiety/depression severity step was also explored. RESULTS Of 1280 registered patients, 696 (54%) completed at least one screening. As patients were encouraged to re-screen, there were in total 1323 screening events (883 in Core and 440 in Enhanced services). The main effect of implementation strategy on adherence was non-significant in both binary and continuous analyses. Anxiety/depression step was significant, with adherence being higher for step 1 than for other steps (p = 0.001, OR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02-0.10). The interaction between study arm and anxiety/depression step was significant (p = 0.02) in the continuous adherence analysis only: adherence was significantly higher (by 7.6% points (95% CI 0.08-15.1%) for step 3 in the Enhanced arm (p = .048) and trending to significance for step 4. DISCUSSION These results support ongoing implementation effort for the first year of implementation to ensure successful uptake of new clinical pathways in over-burdened clinical services. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR Registration: ACTRN12617000411347 (Trial registered 22/03/2017; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372486&isReview=true ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phyllis Butow
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Mona M Faris
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Patrick Kelly
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sharon He
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marnie Harris
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jessica Cuddy
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lindy Masya
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Liesbeth Geerligs
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian Kelly
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| | - Nicole Rankin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Beale
- Department of Medical Oncology, Concord Hospital, NSW, Concord, Australia
| | - Thomas F Hack
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Laura Kirsten
- Nepean Hospital, Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Kingswood, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana Dhillon
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Grimison
- Chris O'Brien LifehouseCamperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Josephine M Clayton
- HammondCare, The Palliative Centre, Greenwich Hospital, Greenwich, NSW, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy Schlub
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, 31 Ellalong Rd North Turramurra 2074, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kanagaratnam R, Zwi S, Webster AC, Isautier J, Lambert K, Shepherd HL, McCaffery K, Sud K, Muscat DM. Interventions to support decision-making, health literacy and self-management in ethnic-minority adults living with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Clin Kidney J 2023. [DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Optimal patient care is directed by clinical practice guidelines, with emphasis on shared decision-making. However, guidelines –and interventions to support their implementation– often do not reflect needs of ethnic minorities who experience inequities in CKD prevalence and outcomes. This review aims to describe what interventions exist to promote, decision-making, self-management and/or health-literacy for ethnic-minority people living with CKD, describe intervention development and/or adaptation processes, and explore the impact on patient outcomes. Six databases were searched (MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, InformitOnline) and two reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed risk of bias. Twelve studies (n = 291 participants), conducted in six countries and targeting nine distinct ethnic-minority groups were included. Intervention strategies consisted of: i) face-to-face education/skills training (3 studies, n = 160), ii) patient education materials (2 studies, n = unspecified), iii) cultural health liaison officer (6 studies, n = 106) or iv) increasing access to healthcare (3 studies, n = 25). There was limited description of cultural targeting/tailoring. Where written information was translated into languages other than English, the approach was exact translation without other cultural adaptation. Few studies reported on community-based research approaches, intervention adaptations requiring limited or no literacy (e.g. infographics; photographs and interviews with local community members) and the inclusion of Cultural Healthcare Workers as part of intervention design. No community-based interventions were evaluated for their impact on clinical or psychosocial outcomes. All interventions conducted in the hospital settings reported favorable outcomes (e.g. reduction in blood pressure) compared to routine care but were limited by methodological issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshana Kanagaratnam
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health , NSW , Australia
| | - Stephanie Zwi
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health , NSW , Australia
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab , NSW , Australia
| | - Angela C Webster
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health , NSW , Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital , NSW , Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney
| | - Jennifer Isautier
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health , NSW , Australia
| | - Kelly Lambert
- Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong , Wollongong , Australia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute , Wollongong
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED) , NSW , Australia
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil School of Nursing , NSW , Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health , NSW , Australia
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab , NSW , Australia
| | - Kamal Sud
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Nepean Clinical School , NSW , Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital , NSW , Australia
| | - Danielle Marie Muscat
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health , NSW , Australia
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab , NSW , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mavragani A, Bonner C, Muscat DM, Dunn AG, Harrison E, Dalmazzo J, Mouwad D, Aslani P, Shepherd HL, McCaffery KJ. Multiple Automated Health Literacy Assessments of Written Health Information: Development of the SHeLL (Sydney Health Literacy Lab) Health Literacy Editor v1. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e40645. [PMID: 36787164 PMCID: PMC9975914 DOI: 10.2196/40645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Producing health information that people can easily understand is challenging and time-consuming. Existing guidance is often subjective and lacks specificity. With advances in software that reads and analyzes text, there is an opportunity to develop tools that provide objective, specific, and automated guidance on the complexity of health information. This paper outlines the development of the SHeLL (Sydney Health Literacy Lab) Health Literacy Editor, an automated tool to facilitate the implementation of health literacy guidelines for the production of easy-to-read written health information. Target users were any person or organization that develops consumer-facing education materials, with or without prior experience with health literacy concepts. Anticipated users included health professionals, staff, and government and nongovernment agencies. To develop this tool, existing health literacy and relevant writing guidelines were collated. Items amenable to programmable automated assessment were incorporated into the Editor. A set of natural language processing methods were also adapted for use in the SHeLL Editor, though the approach was primarily procedural (rule-based). As a result of this process, the Editor comprises 6 assessments: readability (school grade reading score calculated using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG)), complex language (percentage of the text that contains public health thesaurus entries, words that are uncommon in English, or acronyms), passive voice, text structure (eg, use of long paragraphs), lexical density and diversity, and person-centered language. These are presented as global scores, with additional, more specific feedback flagged in the text itself. Feedback is provided in real-time so that users can iteratively revise and improve the text. The design also includes a "text preparation" mode, which allows users to quickly make adjustments to ensure accurate calculation of readability. A hierarchy of assessments also helps users prioritize the most important feedback. Lastly, the Editor has a function that exports the analysis and revised text. The SHeLL Health Literacy Editor is a new tool that can help improve the quality and safety of written health information. It provides objective, immediate feedback on a range of factors, complementing readability with other less widely used but important objective assessments such as complex and person-centered language. It can be used as a scalable intervention to support the uptake of health literacy guidelines by health services and providers of health information. This early prototype can be further refined by expanding the thesaurus and leveraging new machine learning methods for assessing the complexity of the written text. User-testing with health professionals is needed before evaluating the Editor's ability to improve the health literacy of written health information and evaluating its implementation into existing Australian health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Danielle M Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adam G Dunn
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eliza Harrison
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jason Dalmazzo
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dana Mouwad
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Health Literacy Hub, Sydney, Australia
| | - Parisa Aslani
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bruce BR, Leask J, De Vries BS, Shepherd HL. Midwives' perspectives of intravenous fluid management and fluid balance documentation in labour: A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis study. J Adv Nurs 2023; 79:749-761. [PMID: 36443887 PMCID: PMC10099802 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
AIM To describe current practice, examine the influences and explore barriers and facilitators to accurate documentation, for the administration of intravenous fluids during labour. DESIGN A descriptive qualitative study was performed. METHODS Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with Registered Midwives working across Australia. Midwives were recruited via email and social media advertisements. A maximum variation sampling strategy was used to identify potential participants. Interview questions explored four main areas: (i) understanding of indications for IV fluids in labour; (ii) identification of current practice; (iii) barriers to documentation and (iv) benefits and complications of IV fluid administration. Reflexive thematic analysis of recorded-transcribed interviews was conducted. RESULTS Eleven midwives were interviewed. Clinical practice variation across Australia was recognized. Midwives reported a potential risk of harm for women and babies and a current lack of evidence, education and clinical guidance contributing to uncertainty around the use of IV fluids in labour. Overall, eight major themes were identified: (i) A variable clinical practice; (ii) Triggers and habits; (iii) Workplace and professional culture; (iv) Foundational knowledge; (v) Perception of risk; (vi) Professional standards and regulations; (vii) The importance of monitoring maternal fluid balance and (viii) barriers and facilitators to fluid balance documentation. CONCLUSION There was widespread clinical variation identified and midwives reported a potential risk of harm. The major themes identified will inform future quantitative research examining the impact of IV fluids in labour. IMPACT The implications of this research are important and potentially far-reaching. The administration of IV fluids to women in labour is a common clinical intervention. However, there is limited evidence available to guide practice. This study highlights the need for greater education and evidence examining maternal and neonatal outcomes to provide improved clinical guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda R Bruce
- The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julie Leask
- The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bradley S De Vries
- The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Institute for Women, Children and their Families, RPA Women and Babies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koczwara B, Knowles R, Beatty L, Shepherd HL, Shaw JM, Dhillon HM, Karnon J, Ullah S, Butow P. Implementing a web-based system of screening for symptoms and needs using patient-reported outcomes in people with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:69. [PMID: 36542190 PMCID: PMC9768388 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07547-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the implementation of a web-based system of screening for symptoms and needs in people with diverse cancers in a general hospital in Australia. METHODS This was a prospective, single-arm, pragmatic intervention study. After local adaptation of an online portal and training, cancer nurses were asked to register patients to screen via the portal in clinic or at home. Symptoms were scored according to severity, and scores above cut-off were reported to nurses for assessment and management, according to best practice. RESULTS Fifteen nurses working across diverse tumour types agreed to approach patients for screening. Of these, 7 nurses approached 68 patients, with 5 approaching more than 1 during the 7-month study period. Forty-seven (69%) patients completed screening, and 22 rescreened at least once. At first screening, 33 (70%) patients reported at least one symptom, most commonly tiredness (n = 27; 57%), reduced wellbeing (n = 24; 51%) and drowsiness (n = 17; 36%). Of the total 75 screens undertaken during the study, 56 (75%) identified at least one symptom, and 22 (29%) identified at least one severe symptom. All patients with a positive first screen were followed up by a nurse assessment and intervention-mostly reassurance (n = 19, 59%) or referral to another health professional (n = 11, 34%). CONCLUSION Screening for symptoms and needs using a web-based portal identified many unmet needs, but the uptake of this intervention by nurses and patients was lower than expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogda Koczwara
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Reegan Knowles
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Lisa Beatty
- Flinders University Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing | College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joanne M Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Shahid Ullah
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-Operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zwi S, Isautier J, Webster AC, Lambert K, Shepherd HL, McCaffery KJ, Sud K, Saunders J, O'Lone E, Liu N, Kim J, Robbins A, Muscat DM. A feasibility study of a best practice health literacy app for Australian adults with chronic kidney disease. PEC Innov 2022; 1:100047. [PMID: 37213763 PMCID: PMC10194182 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective To investigate feasibility of the SUCCESS app; a cross-platform e-health innovation to improve health literacy, self-management and shared decision-making among culturally-diverse Australian haemodialysis patients. Methods Multi-site, pre-post, mixed-methods study. Haemodialysis patients ≥18 years used the app for 12 weeks. Qualitative data from 18 interviews were thematically analysed to evaluate app acceptability. Quantitative analysis using paired sampled t-tests evaluated feasibility outcomes pertaining to recruitment, retention, data collection and app efficacy (including health literacy; decision self-efficacy; quality of life; behaviour; knowledge; confidence). Results We successfully recruited diverse participants (N = 116; 45% born overseas; 40% low/moderate health literacy) from four Local Health Districts in Sydney, Australia. However, only 61 participants completed follow-up questionnaires. Qualitative analyses provided insights into acceptability and user engagement. Quantitative analyses showed significant improvements on the health literacy domain 'Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers' (Mean Difference [MD] = 0.2 on a 5-point scale; CI95%: 0.0-0.4; p = 0.03) and decision self-efficacy (MD = 4.3 on a 10-point scale; CI95%: 0.6-7.9; p = 0.02) after 12 weeks app use. Conclusions The SUCCESS app was feasible and acceptable to participants. The app will be adapted to facilitate ongoing use and engagement among diverse haemodialysis patients. Innovation This is the first health literacy-informed app to promote active participation in haemodialysis self-management and decision-making, tailored toward culturally-diverse and low health literacy groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Zwi
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jennifer Isautier
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Angela C. Webster
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Kelly Lambert
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kamal Sud
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | - John Saunders
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma O'Lone
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | - Na Liu
- School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jinman Kim
- School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Telehealth and Technology Centre, Nepean Hospital, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Danielle Marie Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Corresponding author at: Room 127A, Edward Ford Building (A27), The University of Sydney, 2006 New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Isautier J, Webster AC, Lambert K, Shepherd HL, McCaffery K, Sud K, Kim J, Liu N, De La Mata N, Raihana S, Kelly PJ, Muscat DM. Evaluation of the SUCCESS health literacy app for Australian adults with chronic kidney disease: Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e39909. [PMID: 36044265 PMCID: PMC9475407 DOI: 10.2196/39909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We developed a smartphone app—the SUCCESS (Supporting Culturally and Linguistically Diverse CKD Patients to Engage in Shared Decision-Making Successfully) app—to support Australian adults with kidney failure undertaking dialysis to actively participate in self-management and decision-making. The content of the SUCCESS app was informed by a theoretical model of health literacy that recognizes the importance of reducing the complexity of health information as well as providing skills necessary to access, understand, and act on this information. Objective The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of the SUCCESS app intervention. Methods We designed a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare the SUCCESS app plus usual care (intervention) to usual care alone (control). A total of 384 participants receiving in-center or home-based hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis will be recruited from six local health districts in the Greater Sydney region, New South Wales, Australia. To avoid intervention contamination, a pragmatic randomization approach will be used for participants undergoing in-center dialysis, in which randomization will be based on the days they receive hemodialysis and by center (ie, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday or Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday). Participants undergoing home-based dialysis will be individually randomized centrally using simple randomization and two stratification factors: language spoken at home and research site. Consenting participants will be invited to use the SUCCESS app for 12 months. The primary endpoints, which will be assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months of app usage, are health literacy skills, evaluated using the Health Literacy Questionnaire; decision self-efficacy, evaluated using the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale; and rates of unscheduled health encounters. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes (ie, quality of life, evaluated with the 5-level EQ-5D; knowledge; confidence; health behavior; and self-management) and clinical outcomes (ie, symptom burden, evaluated with the Palliative care Outcome Scale–Renal; nutritional status, evaluated with the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment; and intradialytic weight gain). App engagement will be determined via app analytics. All analyses will be undertaken using an intention-to-treat approach comparing the intervention and usual care arms. Results The study has been approved by Nepean Blue Mountains Human Research Ethics Committee (2020/ETH00910) and recruitment has begun at nine sites. We expect to finalize data collection by 2023 and publish the manuscript by 2024. Conclusions Enhancing health literacy skills for patients undergoing hemodialysis is an important endeavor, given the association between poor health literacy and poor health outcomes, especially among culturally diverse groups. The findings from this trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at conferences, and updates will be shared with partners, including participating local health districts, Kidney Health Australia, and consumers. The SUCCESS app will continue to be available to all participants following trial completion. Trial Registration Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12621000235808; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380754&isReview=true International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/39909
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Isautier
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Angela C Webster
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Kelly Lambert
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kamal Sud
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jinman Kim
- School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Na Liu
- The University of Sydney Business School, The University of Sydney, Darlington, Australia
| | - Nicole De La Mata
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shahreen Raihana
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Patrick J Kelly
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Danielle M Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tracy MC, Thompson R, Muscat DM, Bonner C, Hoffmann T, McCaffery K, Shepherd HL. Implementing shared decision-making in Australia. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2022; 171:15-21. [PMID: 35562274 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Person-centred care (PCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) are part of national clinical standards for an increasing number of areas of health care delivery. In addition to existing standards for accrediting hospitals, day surgery facilities, public dental services and medical education in Australia, new standards governing primary health care and digital mental health services have been added. Implementation and measurement of PCC and SDM to comply with standards, and training of health professionals, remain challenges for the Australian health sector. Consumer involvement in health research, policy and clinical service governance continues to increase and the National Health and Medical Research Council has begun to encourage consumer and community involvement in health and medical research. This increased consumer engagement and moves towards more PCC provision is reflected in a focus on encouraging patients to ask questions during their clinical care and supports improvements in consumer health literacy. SDM support tools are now being culturally adapted whilst a need for more systemic approaches to their development and implementation persists. With increasing resources and tools for all aspects of PCC and SDM challenges to find sustainable solutions to ensure tools are kept up to date with the best available evidence remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite C Tracy
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Danielle Marie Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tammy Hoffmann
- Centre for Evidence-Informed Health Decisions in the Institute of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Butow P, Shepherd HL, Cuddy J, Rankin N, Harris M, He S, Grimison P, Girgis A, Faris M, Shaw J. Staff perspectives on the feasibility of a clinical pathway for anxiety and depression in cancer care, and mid-implementation adaptations. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:192. [PMID: 35164772 PMCID: PMC8842573 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07532-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical pathways (CPs) are intended to standardise and improve care but do not always produce positive outcomes, possibly because they were not adapted to suit the specific context in which they were enacted. This qualitative study aimed to explore staff perspectives of implementation of a CP for routine screening, assessment, referral and management of anxiety and depression (the ADAPT CP) for patients with cancer, focussing on perceived feasibility of the CP and negotiated adaptations made during the implementation phase. Methods The ADAPT CP was implemented in 12 urban and regional oncology services in Australia. Services were randomised to receive core versus enhanced implementation strategies. Core sites received support until implementation commencement and could access progress reports. Enhanced sites received proactive, ongoing support during the 12-month implementation. Purposively selected staff were interviewed prior to implementation (n = 88) and 6 months later, half-way through the implementation period (n = 89). Monthly meetings with lead multi-disciplinary teams at the eight enhanced sites were recorded. Data were thematically analysed. Results Six overarching themes were identified: ADAPT is of high value; timing for introducing the CP and screening is difficult; online screening is challenging; a burden too much; no-one to refer patients to; and micro-logistics are key. While early screening was deemed desirable, diverse barriers meant this was complex, with adaptations made to time and screening location. Online screening prompted by email, seen as time-saving and efficient, also proved unsuccessful in some services, with adaptations made to in-clinic or phone screening, or repeated email reminders. Staff negative attitudes to ADAPT, time constraints, and perceived poor fit of ADAPT to work roles and flows, all impacted implementation, with key tasks often devolving to a few key individuals. Nevertheless, services remained committed to the ADAPT CP, and worked hard to create, review and adapt strategies to address challenges to optimise success. Conclusions This study demonstrates the interactive nature of health service change, with staff actively engaging with, forming views on, and problem-solving adaptations of the ADAPT CP to overcome barriers. Obtaining staff feedback is critical to ensure health service change is sustainable, meaningful and achieves its promise of improving patient outcomes. Trial registration The study was registered prospectively with the ANZCTR on 22/3/2017. Trial ID ACTRN12617000411347. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07532-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phyllis Butow
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Jessica Cuddy
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Nicole Rankin
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marnie Harris
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Sharon He
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | | | - Afaf Girgis
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| | - Mona Faris
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | | | - Joanne Shaw
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Davies F, Harris M, Shepherd HL, Butow P, Beatty L, Kemp E, Shaw J. Promise unfulfilled: Implementing web‐based psychological therapy in routine cancer care, a qualitative study of oncology health professionals’ attitudes. Psychooncology 2022; 31:1127-1135. [PMID: 35129251 PMCID: PMC9546389 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Web‐based mental health interventions (e‐MhIs) show promise for increasing accessibility and acceptability of therapy for cancer patients. Aim This study aimed to elicit health professionals' (HPs) views on optimal models for including e‐MhIs within standard cancer care. Materials & Method Cancer HPs who worked in a service where an e‐MhI was available to patients, and multi‐disciplinary HPs interested in supportive care, were invited to participate via email. In semi‐structured phone interviews, participants' views on e‐MhIs were elicited. They were then presented with five model vignettes varying in local and centralised staff input, and asked to indicate their preference and views on each. A thematic analysis was applied to the data. Results Twelve nurses, nine psychologists, seven social workers, and three oncologists participated. Four key themes were identified: looking after patients, relationships and multidisciplinary care, trust, and feasibility, all contributing to a meta‐theme of tension. Participants were motivated to ensure optimal patient outcomes and thus needed to trust the intervention content and process. They believed personal relationships increased patient engagement while affording greater work satisfaction for HPs. Most participants preferred a fully integrated model of care involving local HP assessment and design of a tailored therapy incorporating some e‐MhI components where appropriate, but recognised this gold standard was likely not feasible given current resources. Discussion and Conclusion Co‐design with local staff of optimal models of care for the content and process of implementing e‐MhIs is required, with due consideration of the patient group, staffing levels, local workflows and HP preferences, to ensure sustainability and optimal patient outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration The ADAPT Cluster RCT is registered with the ANZCTR Registration number: ACTRN12617000411347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Davies
- Psycho‐Oncology Co‐operative Research Group (PoCoG) School of Psychology University of Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Marnie Harris
- Psycho‐Oncology Co‐operative Research Group (PoCoG) School of Psychology University of Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho‐Oncology Co‐operative Research Group (PoCoG) School of Psychology University of Sydney NSW Australia
- The University of Sydney Sydney Nursing School Faculty of Medicine and Health Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho‐Oncology Co‐operative Research Group (PoCoG) School of Psychology University of Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Lisa Beatty
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute College of Medicine and Public Health Flinders University Australia
| | - Emma Kemp
- Psycho‐Oncology Co‐operative Research Group (PoCoG) School of Psychology University of Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho‐Oncology Co‐operative Research Group (PoCoG) School of Psychology University of Sydney NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jabbour J, Dhillon HM, Shepherd HL, Sundaresan P, Milross C, Clark JR. A web-based comprehensive head and neck cancer patient education and support needs program: Usability testing. Health Informatics J 2022; 0:14604582221087128. [PMID: 35362344 DOI: 10.1177/14604582221087128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: With increasing accessibility of the World Wide Web, patients are using it to obtain patient education materials (PEM). With this in mind, our group (surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, nursing, allied health professionals and academic researchers) developed a comprehensive information resource for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), the Head and Neck Cancer Australia, formerly Beyond Five website. The aim of this study was to determine patient usability of the Head and Neck Cancer Australia website. Methods: Usability testing (Cognitive walkthrough & Think-Aloud) in 18 patients treated for HNC was undertaken at a Cancer centre (anonymous for reviewers). Results: The tasks rated easiest by patients were finding information on psychological well-being (mean time spent: 66 s, range: 10-565), health and well-being effecting quality of life (mean time spent: 36 s, range 9-117) and carer information (mean time spent: 10 s, range 3-35). Patients indicated the website contained a lot of information, covers most topics, was a trusted source of information and a springboard to other information. Conclusions: The Head and Neck Cancer Australia website provides a wide range of information and support in multiple formats available to HNC patients. Further refinements in design, navigation and website instructions are needed to allow effective patient interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Jabbour
- Central Clinical School, 4334University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (POCOG), School of Psychology, 4334The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-making, 4334The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (POCOG), School of Psychology, 4334The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-making, 4334The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Puma Sundaresan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Services,10138Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,200123Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Chris Milross
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (POCOG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Services, 10138Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Clark
- Central Clinical School, 4334University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, 10138Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Butow P, Shepherd HL, Cuddy J, Harris M, He S, Masya L, Faris M, Rankin NM, Beale P, Girgis A, Kelly B, Grimison P, Shaw J. Acceptability and appropriateness of a clinical pathway for managing anxiety and depression in cancer patients: a mixed methods study of staff perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1243. [PMID: 34789239 PMCID: PMC8600707 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07252-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical pathways (CPs) can improve health outcomes, but to be sustainable, must be deemed acceptable and appropriate by staff. A CP for screening and management of anxiety and depression in cancer patients (the ADAPT CP) was implemented in 12 Australian oncology services for 12 months, within a cluster randomised controlled trial of core versus enhanced implementation strategies. This paper compares staff-perceived acceptability and appropriateness of the ADAPT CP across study arms. Methods Multi-disciplinary lead teams at each service tailored, planned, championed and implemented the CP. Staff at participating services, purposively selected for diversity, completed a survey and participated in an interview prior to implementation (T0), and at midpoint (6 months: T1) and end (12 months: T2) of implementation. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Results Seven metropolitan and 5 regional services participated. Questionnaires were completed by 106, 58 and 57 staff at T0, T1 and T2 respectively. Eighty-eight staff consented to be interviewed at T0, with 89 and 76 at T1 and T2 (response rates 70%, 66% and 57%, respectively). Acceptability/appropriateness, on the quantitative measure, was high at T0 (mean of 31/35) and remained at that level throughout the study, with no differences between staff from core versus enhanced services. Perceived burden was relatively low (mean of 11/20) with no change over time. Lowest scores and greatest variability pertained to perceived impact on workload, time and cost. Four major themes were identified: 1) Mental health is an important issue which ADAPT addresses; 2) ADAPT helps staff deliver best care, and reduces staff stress; 3) ADAPT is fit for purpose, for both cancer care services and patients; 4) ADAPT: a catalyst for change. Opposing viewpoints are outlined. Conclusions This study demonstrated high staff-perceived acceptability and appropriateness of the ADAPT CP with regards to its focus, evidence-base, utility to staff and patients, and ability to create change. However, concerns remained regarding burden on staff and time commitment. Strategies from a policy and managerial level will likely be required to overcome the latter issues. Trial registration The study was registered prospectively with the ANZCTR on 22/3/2017. Trial ID ACTRN12617000411347. https://www.anzctr.org.au/. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07252-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Jessica Cuddy
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marnie Harris
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sharon He
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lindy Masya
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mona Faris
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Beale
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Cancer Services for the Sydney Local Health District, Incorporating Royal Prince Alfred, Concord and Canterbury Hospitals, Campsie, NSW, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian Kelly
- School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Davies F, Harris M, Shaw J, Butow P, Newby J, Murphy M, Kirsten L, Shepherd HL. Uptake of an online psychological therapy program (iCanADAPT-Early) when implemented within a clinical pathway in cancer care centres. Psychooncology 2021; 31:338-341. [PMID: 34519384 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Davies
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marnie Harris
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jill Newby
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Murphy
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Laura Kirsten
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | -
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tracy MC, Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Trevena LJ. Doctors' Attitudes to Patient Question Asking, Patient-Generated Question Lists, and Question Prompt Lists: A Qualitative Study. Med Decis Making 2021; 42:283-292. [PMID: 34455860 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211029579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participation by patients in their own health care improves quality and safety. Question prompt lists (QPLs) can improve participation, particularly with doctors' endorsement. Few data have explored doctors' attitudes on these tools. We sought the experiences and attitudes of general practitioners and other specialists toward patient question asking and QPLs in their practice. METHODS In-depth, semistructured interviews and focus groups with purposively selected Australian doctors were conducted. Interview guides were used to explore doctors' experiences of patient question asking, patients' lists, and a sample QPL created using an Australian government-funded online tool, "Question Builder." Recordings were transcribed verbatim and data analyzed thematically using the method by Braun and Clarke. RESULTS Focus groups with 3 to 9 participants and a further 17 individual interviews were conducted. There was a total of 40 participants, 23 general practitioners and 17 other specialists (e.g., physicians, surgeons, pediatricians). Our analysis was summarized into several themes. 1) The doctors expected, encouraged, and had significant experience of patient question asking and patients' lists. They described many barriers for patients and their efforts to ensure patients had the information they needed. 2) The doctors felt responsible for creating an environment conducive to patient question asking, the delivery of answers, having strategies for unanswered questions, and balancing the agendas of both parties in the consultation. 3) Structured QPLs that prepared patients and facilitated the consultation agenda were viewed positively. The degree of time pressures participating doctors experienced in their context had a strong influence on how they responded to the sample QPL. CONCLUSION Doctors in this study expected patients to ask questions and endorsed the benefits of QPLs. However, there were more diverse views about the feasibility of implementing them in practice. Designing QPLs to fit within current workflows, via more succinct and tailored designs, may result in wider doctor acceptance and endorsement, hence maximizing the benefits of QPLs with improved patient participation and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite Clare Tracy
- ASK-GP Centre for Research Excellence, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Danielle Maree Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Susan Wakil Sydney Nursing School, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia)
| | - Lyndal Jane Trevena
- ASK-GP Centre for Research Excellence, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jabbour J, Shepherd HL, Beddow T, Sundaresan P, Milross C, Palme CE, Clark JR, Dhillon HM. Assessment of an evidence-based laryngeal cancer fact sheet: A mixed methods study. Health Informatics J 2021; 27:1460458221989403. [PMID: 33517836 DOI: 10.1177/1460458221989403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate perceptions of a laryngeal cancer fact sheet amongst people with direct experience of the disease and its treatment. A mixed methods study (questionnaire and interview) evaluating the information resource was conducted across two institutions. In total 20 participants responded to the questionnaire. Overall participants reported the information resource was detailed and understandable. Insufficient information was provided on: impact on family in eight participants (40%); impact on work in six (33%); and, second opinions and long-term side effects in five (25%). The majority (67%) wanted a large amount of information with the preferred source being one-on-one meetings with their doctor. The thematic analysis identified three main themes: preferences for information, self-management; and, information sources. People with direct experience of laryngeal cancer and its treatments reported the information resource was comprehensive and clear. There were some gaps in the information provided, particularly related to survivorship issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Puma Sundaresan
- The University of Sydney, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Australia.,Westmead Hospital, Australia
| | - Chris Milross
- The University of Sydney, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Australia
| | - Carsten E Palme
- The University of Sydney, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Clark
- The University of Sydney, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Australia.,Sydney Local Health District, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Martin RW, Brogård Andersen S, O'Brien MA, Bravo P, Hoffmann T, Olling K, Shepherd HL, Dankl K, Stacey D, Dahl Steffensen K. Providing Balanced Information about Options in Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Med Decis Making 2021; 41:780-800. [PMID: 34196241 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211021397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this International Patient Decision Aids Standard (IPDAS) review is to update and synthesize theoretical and empirical evidence on how balanced information can be presented and measured in patient decision aids (PtDAs). METHODS A multidisciplinary team conducted a scoping review using 2 search strategies in multiple electronic databases evaluating the ways investigators defined and measured the balance of information provided about options in PtDAs. The first strategy combined a search informed by the Cochrane Review of the Effectiveness of Decision Aids with a search on balanced information. The second strategy repeated the search published in the 2013 IPDAS update on balanced presentation. RESULTS Of 2450 unique citations reviewed, the full text of 168 articles was screened for eligibility. Sixty-four articles were included in the review, of which 13 provided definitions of balanced presentation, 8 evaluated mechanisms that may introduce bias, and 42 quantitatively measured balanced with methods consistent with the IPDAS criteria in PtDAs. The revised definition of balanced information is, "Objective, complete, salient, transparent, evidence-informed, and unbiased presentation of text and visual information about the condition and all relevant options (with important elements including the features, benefits, harms and procedures of those options) in a way that does not favor one option over another and enables individuals to focus attention on important elements and process this information." CONCLUSIONS Developers can increase the balance of information in PtDAs by informing their structure and design elements using the IPDAS checklist. We suggest that new PtDA components pertaining to balance be evaluated for cognitive bias with experimental methods as well by objectively evaluating patients' and content experts' beliefs from multiple perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Martin
- Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Stina Brogård Andersen
- Department of Clinical Development, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mary Ann O'Brien
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paulina Bravo
- School of Nursing, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.,Millennium Nucleus Center Authority and Power Asymmetries
| | - Tammy Hoffmann
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Karina Olling
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kathrina Dankl
- Design School Kolding, Lab for Social Design, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology Program.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Masya L, Shepherd HL, Butow P, Geerligs L, Allison KC, Dolan C, Prest G, Shaw J. Impact of Individual, Organizational, and Technological Factors on the Implementation of an Online Portal to Support a Clinical Pathway Addressing Psycho-Oncology Care: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2021; 8:e26390. [PMID: 33851926 PMCID: PMC8082382 DOI: 10.2196/26390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical pathways (CPs) can improve patient outcomes but can be complex to implement. Technologies, such as clinical decision support (CDS) tools, can facilitate their use, but require end-user testing in clinical settings. Objective This study applied the Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the individual, organizational, and technological contexts impacting application of a portal to facilitate a CP for anxiety and depression (the ADAPT Portal) in a metropolitan cancer service. The ADAPT Portal triggers patient screening on patient reported outcomes, alerts staff to high scores, recommends evidence-based management, and triggers review and rescreening at set intervals. Methods Quantitative and qualitative data on portal activity, data accuracy, and health service staff perspectives were collected. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data. Results Overall, 15 (100% of those invited) health service staff agreed to be interviewed. During the pilot, 73 users (36 health service staff members and 37 patients) were registered on the ADAPT Portal. Of the 37 patients registered, 16 (43%) completed screening at least once, with seven screening positive and triaged appropriately. In total, 34 support requests were lodged, resulting in 17 portal enhancements (technical issues). Health service staff considered the ADAPT Portal easy to use and useful; however, some deemed it unnecessary or burdensome (individual issues), particularly in a busy cancer service (organizational issues). Conclusions User testing of a CDS to facilitate screening and assessment of anxiety and depression in cancer patients highlighted some technological issues in implementing the ADAPT CDS, resulting in 17 enhancements. Our results highlight the importance of obtaining health service staff feedback when piloting specialized CDS tools and addressing contextual factors when implementing them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindy Masya
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Liesbeth Geerligs
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karen C Allison
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Gabrielle Prest
- Australian College of Nursing, Sydney, Australia.,College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Nutbeam D, Trevena L, McCaffery KJ. Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:521-524. [PMID: 32472490 PMCID: PMC7878628 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05912-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Research into health literacy and shared decision-making has largely developed along parallel, but distinct lines over the past two decades. There is little evidence that the concepts and related practice have intersected except in the most functional way, for example, to simplify shared decision-making tools by improving readability scores of decision aids. This paper presents an integrated model to strengthen and sustain patient engagement in health care by drawing on the strengths of both concepts. This includes addressing patients' skills and capacities, alongside modifications to written and verbal information. We propose an expanded model of shared decision-making which incorporates health literacy concepts and promotes two-tiered intervention methods to improve the targeting and personalization of communication and support the development of transferable health literacy skills among patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Muscat
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Don Nutbeam
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Geerligs L, Shepherd HL, Butow P, Shaw J, Masya L, Cuddy J, Rankin NM. What factors influence organisational readiness for change? Implementation of the Australian clinical pathway for the screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (ADAPT CP). Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:3235-3244. [PMID: 33095356 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05836-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Translation of evidence-based psycho-oncology interventions into routine care can significantly improve patient outcomes, yet effective implementation remains challenging due to numerous real-world barriers. A key factor that may influence implementation is organisational readiness for change. This mixed method study sought to identify factors associated with organisational readiness for implementing the Australian clinical pathway for the screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (ADAPT CP). METHODS We collected data from multidisciplinary staff across six Australian cancer services who were preparing to implement the ADAPT CP. Services were categorised as having 'high' versus 'mid-range' organisational readiness based on a median split on the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) questionnaire (score range = 12-60). Qualitative data from the semi-structured interviews based on the Promoting Action Research in Health Services (PARiHS) framework were analysed thematically and compared for services with high- versus mid-range organisational readiness. RESULTS Three services with high- (mean ORIC range, 52.25-56.88), and three with mid-range (range, 38.75-46.39) organisational readiness scores were identified. Staff at services reporting higher readiness described a more collaborative and proactive service culture, strong communication processes and greater role flexibility. They also reported greater confidence in overcoming anticipated barriers and clearer strategies for addressing issues. CONCLUSIONS Levels of organisational readiness were related to distinct qualitative themes. Targeting these issues in services where readiness is mid-range or low prior to full-scale roll-out may improve staff levels of confidence and efficacy in implementing psycho-oncology-focused interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Geerligs
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - H L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - P Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - L Masya
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Cuddy
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - N M Rankin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, c/o Charles Perkins Centre Level 2 (D17), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Geerligs L, Shepherd HL, Rankin NM, Masya L, Shaw JM, Price MA, Dhillon H, Dolan C, Prest G, Butow P. The value of real-world testing: a qualitative feasibility study to explore staff and organisational barriers and strategies to support implementation of a clinical pathway for the management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:109. [PMID: 32742718 PMCID: PMC7388211 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00648-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Effective translation of evidence-based research into clinical practice requires assessment of the many factors that can impact implementation success. Research methods that draw on recognised implementation frameworks, such as the Promoting Action Research in Health Services (PARiHS) framework, and that test feasibility to gain information prior to full-scale roll-out, can support a more structured approach to implementation. Objective This paper presents qualitative findings from a feasibility study in one cancer service of an online portal to operationalise a clinical pathway for the screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients. The aim of this study was to explore staff perspectives on the feasibility and acceptance of a range of strategies to support implementation in order to inform the full-scale roll-out. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen hospital staff holding a range of clinical, administrative and managerial roles, and with differing levels of exposure to the pathway. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, and themes were subsequently organised within the constructs of the PARiHS framework. Results Barriers and facilitators that affected the feasibility of the online portal and implementation strategies were organised across eight key themes: staff perceptions, culture, external influences, attitudes to psychosocial care, intervention fit, familiarity, burden and engagement. These themes mapped to the PARiHS framework's three domains of evidence, context and facilitation. Conclusions Implementation success may be threatened by a range of factors related to the real-world context, perceptions of the intervention (evidence) and the process by which it is introduced (facilitation). Feasibility testing of implementation strategies can provide unique insights into issues likely to influence full-scale implementation, allowing for early tailoring and more effective facilitation which may save time, money and effort in the long-term. Use of a determinant implementation framework can assist researchers to synthesise and effectively respond to barriers as they arise. While the current feasibility study related to a specific implementation, strategies such as regular engagement with local stakeholders, and discussion of barriers arising in real-time during early testing is likely to be of benefit to all researchers and clinicians seeking to maximise the likelihood of long-term implementation success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Geerligs
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Lindy Masya
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Joanne M Shaw
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Melanie A Price
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Haryana Dhillon
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | | | | | | | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Davies F, Shepherd HL, Beatty L, Clark B, Butow P, Shaw J. Implementing Web-Based Therapy in Routine Mental Health Care: Systematic Review of Health Professionals' Perspectives. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17362. [PMID: 32706713 PMCID: PMC7413287 DOI: 10.2196/17362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Web-based therapies hold great promise to increase accessibility and reduce costs of delivering mental health care; however, uptake in routine settings has been low. OBJECTIVE Our objective in this review was to summarize what is known about health care professionals' perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of web-based psychological treatments in routine care of adults in health care settings. METHODS We searched 5 major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library) for qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods studies exploring health professionals' views on computer- or internet-based psychological treatment programs. We coded included articles for risk of bias and extracted data using a prepiloted extraction sheet. RESULTS We identified 29 eligible articles: 14 qualitative, 11 quantitative, and 4 mixed methods. We identified the following themes: patient factors, health professional factors, the therapeutic relationship, therapy factors, organizational and system factors, and models of care. Health professionals supported web-based therapies only for patients with relatively straightforward, low-risk diagnoses, strong motivation and engagement, high computer literacy and access, and low need for tailored content. They perceived flexibility with timing and location as advantages of web-based therapy, but preferred blended therapy to facilitate rapport and allow active monitoring and follow-up of patients. They emphasized the need for targeted training and organizational support to manage changed workflows. Health professionals were concerned about the confidentiality and security of client data for web-based programs, suggesting that clear and transparent protocols need to be in place to reassure health professionals before they will be willing to refer. CONCLUSIONS Without health professionals' support, many people will not access web-based therapies. To increase uptake, it is important to ensure that health professionals receive education, familiarization, and training to support them in incorporating web-based therapies into their practice, and to design systems that support health professionals in this new way of working with patients and addressing their concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42018100869; https://tinyurl.com/y5vaoqsk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Davies
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lisa Beatty
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders University South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Brodie Clark
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Muscat DM, Morony S, Nutbeam D, Ayre J, Shepherd HL, Smith SK, Dhillon HM, Hayen A, Luxford K, Meshreky W, McCaffery K. Learners' experience and perceived impact of a health literacy program in adult basic education: a qualitative study. Public Health Res Pract 2020; 30:29231909. [PMID: 32601653 DOI: 10.17061/phrp29231909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives and importance of the study: Adult literacy programs aim to empower learners to participate more effectively in everyday life. This includes programs with health content embedded in curricula to target health literacy. Adult learners who attend these programs represent a heterogeneous population, but include a high proportion of hard-to-reach or socially disadvantaged groups in terms of age, ethnicity, educational background, language and prevalence of learning disabilities. In 2014, we conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a health literacy program in adult basic education classes across New South Wales, Australia. This paper reports findings from a qualitative study exploring learners' experience of the course and its perceived impact on their lives, as well as their understanding and confidence about health. STUDY TYPE Qualitative interview study. METHOD We conducted semistructured interviews as part of the evaluation of the 18-week health literacy program, with participants purposively recruited from six health literacy classes (n = 22). Researchers trained in qualitative methods interviewed adult learners either face to face or over the phone using a topic guide. Data was analysed using the Framework method, a matrix-based approach to thematic analysis. RESULTS The majority of interviewees were female, lived in metropolitan areas and were from non-English-speaking backgrounds. Most had existing self-reported health problems and inadequate functional health literacy. Most participants described positive impacts of the health literacy course on their language, literacy and numeracy skills, functional health literacy skills, and health knowledge. They also reported being able to translate this into health actions including interacting with providers, accessing and using healthcare, and managing health and illness (e.g. making healthier food choices). Learners also described positive social outcomes of the course, including feelings of connectedness and interpersonal trust within a new network of learners, and reported sharing new knowledge with others in their communities. CONCLUSIONS The findings add value to existing limited evidence that has demonstrated the untapped potential of adult basic education to develop health literacy skills among socially disadvantaged groups. Learners valued the opportunity to share experiences in structured group learning, and reported confidence to transfer new knowledge into their home and wider social network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Suzanne Morony
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Don Nutbeam
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sian K Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Andrew Hayen
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Luxford
- Clinical Excellence Commission, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tracy MC, Shepherd HL, Patel P, Trevena LJ. Exploring the Vast Choice of Question Prompt Lists Available to Health Consumers via Google: Environmental Scan. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e17002. [PMID: 32469321 PMCID: PMC7293062 DOI: 10.2196/17002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is increasing interest in shared decision making (SDM) in Australia. Question prompt lists (QPLs) support question asking by patients, a key part of SDM. QPLs have been studied in a variety of settings, and increasingly the internet provides a source of suggested questions for patients. Environmental scans have been shown to be useful in assessing the availability and quality of online SDM tools. Objective This study aimed to assess the number and readability of QPLs available to users via Google.com.au. Methods Our environmental scan used search terms derived from literature and reputable websites to search for QPLs available via Google.com.au. Following removal of duplicates from the 4000 URLs and 22 reputable sites, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to create a list of unique QPLs. A sample of 20 QPLs was further assessed for list length, proxy measures of quality such as a date of review, and evidence of doctor endorsement. Readability of the sample QPL instructions and QPLs themselves was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores. Results Our environmental scan identified 173 unique QPLs available to users. Lists ranged in length from 1 question to >200 questions. Of our sample, 50% (10/20) had a listed date of creation or update, and 60% (12/20) had evidence of authorship or source. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores for instructions were higher than for the QPLs (grades 10.3 and 7.7, respectively). There was over a 1 grade difference between QPLs from reputable sites compared with other sites (grades 4.2 and 5.4, respectively). Conclusions People seeking questions to ask their doctor using Google.com.au encounter a vast number of question lists that they can use to prepare for consultations with their doctors. Markers of the quality or usefulness of various types of online QPLs, either surrogate or direct, have not yet been established, which makes it difficult to assess the value of the abundance of lists. Doctor endorsement of question asking has previously been shown to be an important factor in the effectiveness of QPLs, but information regarding this is not readily available online. Whether these diverse QPLs are endorsed by medical practitioners warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite Clare Tracy
- Ask, Share, Know: Rapid Evidence for General Practice Decisions Centre for Research Excellence, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Ask, Share, Know: Rapid Evidence for General Practice Decisions Centre for Research Excellence, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Pinika Patel
- Ask, Share, Know: Rapid Evidence for General Practice Decisions Centre for Research Excellence, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lyndal Jane Trevena
- Ask, Share, Know: Rapid Evidence for General Practice Decisions Centre for Research Excellence, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tracy MC, Shepherd HL, Ivers RG, Mann M, Chiappini L, Trevena LJ. What patients want to ask their doctors: Data analysis from Question Builder, an online question prompt list tool. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103:937-943. [PMID: 31831304 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 10/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Question prompt lists (QPLs) are one strategy to increase patient participation in healthcare decisions but the extent to which consumers might access them in the 'real world' is largely unknown. This study measured usage of a passively-promoted, government-funded web-based patient-generated QPL tool, called Question Builder (Australia) (QB) hosted on healthdirect.gov.au, a consumer health information website. METHODS 12.5months of post-launch Google Analytics data from QB were analysed. Two existing coding frameworks (RIAS and ACEPP) were used to code QB questions thematically and 107 user-generated lists were analysed further to determine the questions chosen and prioritised. RESULTS QB was accessed 8915 times, 4000 question lists were commenced and 1271 lists completed. Most lists were for general practice (GP) consultations (2444) rather than specialist consultations (1556). The most frequently chosen question was "Do I need any tests?". Shared decision-making questions (SDM) made up 40% of questions prioritised e.g. "Do I need any treatment and what are my treatment options?" CONCLUSIONS There is active use of this online QPL, with strong interest in creating lists for GP consultations. Question Builder users prioritised questions which facilitate SDM. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS More research is required to assess the utilisation of QB in practice and health professionals' views of QB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rowena G Ivers
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
| | - Meghan Mann
- Healthdirect Australia Ltd, Haymarket, Australia.
| | - Lucia Chiappini
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Lyndal J Trevena
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Murphy MJ, Newby JM, Butow P, Loughnan SA, Joubert AE, Kirsten L, Allison K, Shaw J, Shepherd HL, Smith J, Andrews G. Randomised controlled trial of internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for clinical depression and/or anxiety in cancer survivors (iCanADAPT Early). Psychooncology 2019; 29:76-85. [PMID: 31659822 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) on clinical depression and/or anxiety, distress, fear of cancer recurrence, and quality of life in cancer survivors. METHODS Random assignation of 114 participants to iCBT or treatment-as-usual (TAU). The clinician-supervised iCBT program (iCanADAPT Early) consisted of eight lessons over 16 weeks. Self-report questionnaires occurred at baseline, midpoint, and posttreatment for both groups with 3-month follow-up for iCBT participants. A mixed modelling approach to compare groups occurred. RESULTS iCBT was superior to TAU on all outcome measures at posttreatment. Compared with TAU, the iCBT group showed a significant decrease over time in anxiety and depression symptoms (primary outcome, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Hedges g = 1.51). Additionally the iCBT group had significantly lower general distress (Kessler-10, g = 1.56), fear of cancer recurrence (Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory, g = 0.39), and significantly higher quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, g = 0.74) at posttreatment compared with the TAU group. High adherence and satisfaction were found for iCBT with low clinician time. CONCLUSION Clinician-supervised iCBT has significant benefits for cancer survivors with clinical depression and anxiety disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Murphy
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, UNSW, NSW, Australia
| | - J M Newby
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, UNSW, NSW, Australia.,School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, UNSW, NSW, Australia
| | - P Butow
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - S A Loughnan
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, UNSW, NSW, Australia
| | - A E Joubert
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, UNSW, NSW, Australia
| | - L Kirsten
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Nepean Cancer Care Centre, NSW, Australia
| | - K Allison
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Shaw
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - H L Shepherd
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Smith
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, UNSW, NSW, Australia
| | - G Andrews
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression, UNSW, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Munro S, Manski R, Donnelly KZ, Agusti D, Stevens G, Banach M, Boardman MB, Brady P, Bradt CC, Foster T, Johnson DJ, Norsigian J, Nothnagle M, Shepherd HL, Stern L, Trevena L, Elwyn G, Thompson R. Investigation of factors influencing the implementation of two shared decision-making interventions in contraceptive care: a qualitative interview study among clinical and administrative staff. Implement Sci 2019; 14:95. [PMID: 31706329 PMCID: PMC6842477 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0941-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is limited evidence on how to implement shared decision-making (SDM) interventions in routine practice. We conducted a qualitative study, embedded within a 2 × 2 factorial cluster randomized controlled trial, to assess the acceptability and feasibility of two interventions for facilitating SDM about contraceptive methods in primary care and family planning clinics. The two SDM interventions comprised a patient-targeted intervention (video and prompt card) and a provider-targeted intervention (encounter decision aids and training). Methods Participants were clinical and administrative staff aged 18 years or older who worked in one of the 12 clinics in the intervention arm, had email access, and consented to being audio-recorded. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted upon completion of the trial. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Data collection and thematic analysis were informed by the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework, which are relevant to the successful implementation of provider behaviour change interventions. Results Interviews (n = 29) indicated that the interventions were not systematically implemented in the majority of clinics. Participants felt the interventions were aligned with their role and they had confidence in their skills to use the decision aids. However, the novelty of the interventions, especially a need to modify workflows and change behavior to use them with patients, were implementation challenges. The interventions were not deeply embedded in clinic routines and their use was threatened by lack of understanding of their purpose and effect, and staff absence or turnover. Participants from clinics that had an enthusiastic study champion or team-based organizational culture found these social supports had a positive role in implementing the interventions. Conclusions Variation in capabilities and motivation among clinical and administrative staff, coupled with inconsistent use of the interventions in routine workflow contributed to suboptimal implementation of the interventions. Future trials may benefit by using implementation strategies that embed SDM in the organizational culture of clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Munro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, E204 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada. .,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia, 588 - 1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
| | - Ruth Manski
- Society of Family Planning, 225 South 17th Street, Suite 2709, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA
| | - Kyla Z Donnelly
- Dartmouth College, Level 5 Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Daniela Agusti
- Dartmouth College Health Service, 7 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
| | - Gabrielle Stevens
- Dartmouth College, Level 5 Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | | | - Maureen B Boardman
- Dartmouth College, Level 5 Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | | | | | - Tina Foster
- Dartmouth College, Level 5 Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.,Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Deborah J Johnson
- Dartmouth College, Level 5 Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Judy Norsigian
- Our Bodies Ourselves, P.O. Box 590403, Newton Center, MA, 02459, USA
| | - Melissa Nothnagle
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, Natividad Medical Center, 1441 Constitution Blvd, Salinas, CA, 93906, USA
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building (A27), Fisher Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Lisa Stern
- Planned Parenthood Northern California, 2185 Pacheco St, Concord, CA, 94520, USA
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building (A27), Fisher Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Dartmouth College, Level 5 Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building (A27), Fisher Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shepherd HL, Geerligs L, Butow P, Masya L, Shaw J, Price M, Dhillon HM, Hack TF, Girgis A, Luckett T, Lovell M, Kelly B, Beale P, Grimison P, Shaw T, Viney R, Rankin NM. The Elusive Search for Success: Defining and Measuring Implementation Outcomes in a Real-World Hospital Trial. Front Public Health 2019; 7:293. [PMID: 31681724 PMCID: PMC6813570 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective and Study Setting: Research efforts to identify factors that influence successful implementation are growing. This paper describes methods of defining and measuring outcomes of implementation success, using a cluster randomized controlled trial with 12 cancer services in Australia comparing the effectiveness of implementation strategies to support adherence to the Australian Clinical Pathway for the Screening, Assessment and Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Cancer Patients (ADAPT CP). Study Design and Methods: Using the StaRI guidelines, a process evaluation was planned to explore participant experience of the ADAPT CP, resources and implementation strategies according to the Implementation Outcomes Framework. This study focused on identifying measurable outcome criteria, prior to data collection for the trial, which is currently in progress. Principal Findings: We translated each implementation outcome into clearly defined and measurable criteria, noting whether each addressed the ADAPT CP, resources or implementation strategies, or a combination of the three. A consensus process defined measures for the primary outcome (adherence) and secondary (implementation) outcomes; this process included literature review, discussion and clear measurement parameters. Based on our experience, we present an approach that could be used as a guide for other researchers and clinicians seeking to define success in their work. Conclusions: Defining and operationalizing success in real-world implementation yields a range of methodological challenges and complexities that may be overcome by iterative review and engagement with end users. A clear understanding of how outcomes are defined and measured, based on a strong theoretical framework, is crucial to meaningful measurement and outcomes. The conceptual approach described in this article could be generalized for use in other studies. Trial Registration: The ADAPT Program to support the management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: a cluster randomized trial to evaluate different implementation strategies of the Clinical Pathway for Screening, Assessment and Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Cancer Patients was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Registration Number: ACTRN12617000411347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Liesbeth Geerligs
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lindy Masya
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Melanie Price
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas F Hack
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Psychosocial Oncology & Cancer Nursing Research, St. Boniface Hospital Research Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Melanie Lovell
- HammondCare Northern Sydney, Greenwich, NSW, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian Kelly
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Beale
- Cancer Services for the Sydney Local Health District (Incorporating Royal Prince Alfred, Concord and Canterbury Hospitals), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Grimison
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Shaw
- Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, UTS Business School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
McCaffery KJ, Morony S, Muscat DM, Hayen A, Shepherd HL, Dhillon HM, Smith SK, Cvejic E, Meshreky W, Luxford K, Nutbeam D. Evaluation of an Australian Health Literacy Program Delivered in Adult Education Settings. Health Lit Res Pract 2019; 3:S42-S57. [PMID: 31687657 PMCID: PMC6826892 DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20190402-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Adult education targeting health literacy (HL) may bring added value in the form of improved health. Objective: This study evaluated the effects of a HL program as part of an adult education curriculum for adults with low literacy and numeracy. Methods: This was a partial-cluster randomized controlled trial among 308 adults enrolled in basic education programs in Australia. Of the 308 participants, 141 (46%) were randomized to either the standard program (language, literacy, and numeracy [LLN]), or the HL intervention (LLN with embedded health content); the remainder (n = 167) were allocated to standard intervention programs by the education provider at the class level. The main outcomes were functional HL, self-reported confidence, patient activation, generic HL (ie, HLQ, health knowledge, and self-reported health behavior). Data were collected at baseline, immediately after, and at 6 months post-intervention. Key Results: Of the 308 participants, 71% had limited literacy and 60% spoke a language other than English at home. Both interventions benefited participants, with improvements from baseline to immediate follow up on individual-level functional HL (e.g., reading a thermometer; HL group 18.4% vs. standard group 7.2%; p = .001), confidence (HL group 0.34 vs. standard group 0.06; p = .014) and health literacy questionnaire (HLQ) subscales. At 6 months, improvements in confidence (p < .001) and some HLQ measures were retained. A consistent pattern of increased improvement in the HL program was observed compared to the standard program, although only some measures reached statistical significance: reading a food label (HL group 6.03/10 correct vs. standard group 5.49/10 correct; p = .022); confidence (p = .008); ability to actively manage health (HLQ) (p = .017), and health knowledge at 6 months (HL group 68% vs. standard group 60% correct, p = .052). HL participants reported being more likely to share course information and rated the program more useful to understand their health. Conclusions: Improving language, literacy, and numeracy generally has potential public health benefits that are retained at 6 months. Integrating health content adds further value to adult basic learning, is feasible, and potentially scalable. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2019;3(Suppl.):S42–S57.] Plain Language Summary: We compared the effect of an adult education-based health literacy (HL) program versus a standard language, literacy, and numeracy program on students' HL skills and psychosocial outcomes. Although students in both trial arms improved their skills, students in the HL program had better outcomes with higher HL, greater confidence, and higher health knowledge scores at 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Address correspondence to Kirsten J. McCaffery, PhD, Sydney School of Public Health, Room 128B Edward Ford Building, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Muscat DM, Morony S, Trevena L, Hayen A, Shepherd HL, Smith SK, Dhillon HM, Luxford K, Nutbeam D, McCaffery KJ. Skills for Shared Decision-Making: Evaluation of a Health Literacy Program for Consumers with Lower Literacy Levels. Health Lit Res Pract 2019; 3:S58-S74. [PMID: 31687658 PMCID: PMC6826761 DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20190408-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) has been found to be significantly and positively associated with improved patient outcomes. For an SDM process to occur, patients require functional, communicative, and critical health literacy (HL) skills. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a program to improve health literacy skills for SDM in adults with lower literacy. Methods: An HL program including an SDM component (HL + SDM) and teaching of the three “AskShareKnow” questions was delivered in adult basic education settings in New South Wales, Australia. The program was evaluated using a partially cluster-randomized controlled trial comparing it to standard language, literacy, and numeracy (LLN) training. We measured the effect of these programs on (1) HL skills for SDM (conceptual knowledge, graphical literacy, health numeracy), (2) types of questions considered important for health decision-making, (3) preferences for control in decision-making, and (4) decisional conflict. We also measured AskShareKnow question recall, use, and evaluation in HL + SDM participants. Key Results: There were 308 participants from 28 classes enrolled in the study. Most participants had limited functional HL (71%) and spoke a language other than English at home (60%). In the primary analysis, the HL + SDM program compared with the standard LLN program significantly increased conceptual knowledge (19.1% difference between groups in students achieving the competence threshold; p = .018) and health numeracy (10.9% difference; p = .032), but not graphical literacy (5.8% difference; p = .896). HL + SDM participants were significantly more likely to consider it important to ask questions that would enable SDM compared to standard LLN participants who prioritized nonmedical procedural questions (all p < .01). There was no difference in preferences for control in decision-making or in decisional conflict. Among HL + SDM participants, 79% (n = 85) correctly recalled at least one of the AskShareKnow questions immediately post-intervention, and 35% (n = 29) after 6 months. Conclusions: Teaching SDM content increased participants' HL skills for SDM and changed the nature of the questions they would ask health care professionals in a way that would enable shared health decisions. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2019;3(Suppl.):S58–S74.] Plain Language Summary: We developed a health literacy program that included a shared decision-making (SDM) section. The program was delivered in adult basic education classes by trained educators and compared to standard language, literacy, and numeracy training. Teaching SDM content increased participants' health literacy skills for SDM and changed the nature of the questions they would ask health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M. Muscat
- Address correspondence to Danielle M. Muscat, PhD, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, 127A Edward Ford Building, NSW, 2006, Australia;
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gessler D, Juraskova I, Sansom‐Daly UM, Shepherd HL, Patterson P, Muscat DM. Clinician‐patient‐family decision‐making and health literacy in adolescents and young adults with cancer and their families: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Psychooncology 2019; 28:1408-1419. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Gessler
- School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence‐Based Decision‐Making (CeMPED)The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Psycho‐Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence‐Based Decision‐Making (CeMPED)The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Psycho‐Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Ursula M. Sansom‐Daly
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer CentreSydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
- School of Women's and Children's HealthUNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Youth Cancer ServicePrince of Wales Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Heather L. Shepherd
- School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence‐Based Decision‐Making (CeMPED)The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Psycho‐Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), School of PsychologyThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Pandora Patterson
- Cancer Nursing Research UnitThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Research, Evaluation, and Social Policy Unit, CanTeen Australia Newtown New South Wales Australia
| | - Danielle Marie Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Hay L, Shivarev A, Patel B, McKinn S, Bonner C, McCaffery K, Jansen J. Discussions about evidence and preferences in real-life general practice consultations with older patients. Patient Educ Couns 2019; 102:879-887. [PMID: 30578105 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore how decisions are made in real-life general practice consultations with older patients (65+ years), and examine how general practitioners (GPs) communicate risk and benefit information and evidence, and integrate patient preferences. METHODS Secondary analysis of 20 video-recorded consultations with older patients in Australian primary healthcare settings. Consultations were analysed qualitatively using the Framework method and quantitatively using the Observer OPTION5 scale and the Assessing Communication about Evidence and Patient Preferences (ACEPP) tool. RESULTS Overall, Observer OPTION5 and ACEPP scores were low, with mean total scores of 11.3 (out of 100) and 10.4 (out of 40) respectively. Together with qualitative findings, these results suggest that shared decision-making did not occur, and that healthcare options (including anticipated benefits and risks), evidence and patient preferences were rarely discussed in our sample of consultations with older people. GPs often unilaterally made treatment decisions (usually pharmacotherapy) while patients reverted to a passive decision-making role. CONCLUSION We observed a lack of shared decision-making in our primary care study, with little engagement of older patients in decisions about their health. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Training and support tools may be needed to enhance the capacity and self-efficacy of providers and older patients to share healthcare decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Marie Muscat
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia; University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Hay
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alex Shivarev
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bindu Patel
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Australia; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shannon McKinn
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, Australia; University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, Australia; University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, Australia; University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lim BT, Huang YJ, Shepherd HL, Shaw J, Costa D, Durcinoska I, Young JM, White K, Sze M, Butow P. Health literacy and cancer care coordination in Chinese migrant patients and their carers: A cross-sectional survey. Psychooncology 2019; 28:1048-1055. [PMID: 30828923 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to describe the levels of health literacy and experience of care coordination among Chinese migrant patients with cancer and their carers in Australia, and to examine factors associated with these. METHODS Patients' self-reported data were collected using the Health Literacy and Cancer Care Coordination questionnaires. We conducted multivariate linear regression analyses to investigate predictors of patients' health literacy and their care experience. Canonical correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between patients' health literacy and their care experience. RESULTS A total of 68 patients and eight carers participated in the survey. Patients and carers reported similar levels of health literacy, with the lowest scores being in the "Having sufficient information to manage health" and "Navigating the health system" subscales. Gender (P = 0.026, partial η2 = 0.281) and educational attainment (P = 0.015, partial η2 = 0.250) had significant and large effects on patients' health literacy, after controlling for each other. Educational attainment showed a significant and medium association with patients' experience of cancer care coordination (P = 0.041, partial η2 = 0.101). A large and positive correlation was found between patients' health literacy and experience of cancer care coordination (canonical correlation = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS Our findings reveal the health literacy and care coordination needs of Chinese migrant patients with cancer in Australia, especially those with lower educational attainment. Future efforts are necessary to enhance Chinese migrants' health literacy and establish an accessible and easy-to-navigate care environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bee Teng Lim
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yi-Jing Huang
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel Costa
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Pain Management Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ivana Durcinoska
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane M Young
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Local Health District, Institute of Academic Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Nursing Research Unit, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Minglo Sze
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Muscat DM, Kanagaratnam R, Shepherd HL, Sud K, McCaffery K, Webster A. Beyond dialysis decisions: a qualitative exploration of decision-making among culturally and linguistically diverse adults with chronic kidney disease on haemodialysis. BMC Nephrol 2018; 19:339. [PMID: 30482170 PMCID: PMC6258454 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-1131-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, limited research has been dedicated to exploring the experience of decision-making for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who have initiated dialysis and have to make decisions in the context of managing multiple illnesses. Evidence about the experience of decision-making for minority or disadvantaged groups living with CKD (e.g. culturally and linguistically diverse adults; those with lower health literacy or cognitive impairment) is also lacking. This study aimed to explore the experience of healthcare decision-making among culturally and linguistically diverse adults receiving in-centre haemodialysis for advanced CKD. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with English or Arabic-speaking adults recruited from four large haemodialysis units in Greater Western Sydney, Australia using stratified, purposive sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using the Framework method. RESULTS Interviews were conducted with 35 participants from a range of cultural backgrounds (26 English-language; 9 Arabic-language). One quarter had limited health literacy as assessed by the Single Item Literacy Screener. Four major themes were identified from the data, highlighting that participants had limited awareness of decision-points throughout the CKD trajectory (other than the decision to initiate dialysis), expressed passivity regarding their involvement in healthcare decisions, and reported inconsistent information provision within and across dialysis units. There was diversity within cultural and linguistic groups in terms of preferences and beliefs regarding religiosity, decision-making and internalised prototypical cultural values. CONCLUSION Without sustained effort, adults living with CKD may be uninformed about decision points throughout the CKD trajectory and/or unengaged in the process of making decisions. While culture may be an important component of people's lives, cultural assumptions may oversimplify the diverse individual differences that exist within cultural groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Marie Muscat
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Roshana Kanagaratnam
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Heather L. Shepherd
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Kamal Sud
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Nepean Clinical School, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine and Transplantation, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW Australia
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW Australia
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Angela Webster
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine and Transplantation, Westmead Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yip S, Fleming J, Shepherd HL, Walczak A, Clark J, Butow P. "As Long as You Ask": A Qualitative Study of Biobanking Consent-Oncology Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences-the B-PPAE Study. Oncologist 2018; 24:844-856. [PMID: 30413662 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Consent to biobanking remains controversial, with little empirical data to guide policy and practice. This study aimed to explore the attitudes, motivations, and concerns of both oncology patients and health care professionals (HCPs) regarding biobanking. MATERIALS AND METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with oncology patients and HCPs purposively selected from five Australian hospitals. Patients were invited to give biobanking consent as part of a clinical trial and/or for future research were eligible. HCPs were eligible if involved in consenting patients to biobanking or to donate specimens to clinical trials. RESULTS Twenty-two patients participated, with head and neck (36%) and prostate (18%) the most common cancer diagnoses; all had consented to biobanking. Twenty-two HCPs participated, from across eight cancer streams and five disciplines. Themes identified were (a) biobanking is a "no brainer"; (b) altruism or scientific enquiry; (c) trust in clinicians, science, and institutions; (d) no consent-just do it; (e) respecting patient choice ("opt-out"); (f) respectful timing of the request; (g) need for emotional/family support; (h) context of the biobanking request matters; and (i) factors for biobanking success. DISCUSSION These findings reinforced previous findings regarding high public trust in, and support for, biobanking. An initial opt-in consent approach with the option of later opt-out was favored by patients to respect and recognize donor generosity, whereas HCPs preferred an upfront opt-out model. Factors impacting biobanking success included the context of the request for use in a trial or specific research question, pre-existing patient and HCP rapport, a local institution champion, and infrastructure. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Patients and health care professionals (HCPs) who experienced cancer biobanking consent were overwhelmingly supportive of biobanking. The motivations and approaches to seeking consent were largely mirrored between the groups. The findings of this study support the opt-in model of biobanking favored by patients; however, HCPs preferred an opt-out model. Both groups recognize the importance of making the request for biobanking at an appropriate time, preferably with emotional or family support, and respecting the timing of the request and privacy of the patient. Biobanking success can be promoted by hospital departments with a research focus by identifying an institutional biobanking champion and ensuring local infrastructure is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Yip
- Sydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jennifer Fleming
- Sydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Jonathan Clark
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Butow P, Shaw J, Shepherd HL, Price M, Masya L, Kelly B, Rankin NM, Girgis A, Hack TF, Beale P, Viney R, Dhillon HM, Coll J, Kelly P, Lovell M, Grimison P, Shaw T, Luckett T, Cuddy J, White F. Comparison of implementation strategies to influence adherence to the clinical pathway for screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (ADAPT CP): study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2018. [PMID: 30404619 DOI: 10.1186/s12885‐018‐4962‐9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health service change is difficult to achieve. One strategy to facilitate such change is the clinical pathway, a guide for clinicians containing a defined set of evidence-based interventions for a specific condition. However, optimal strategies for implementing clinical pathways are not well understood. Building on a strong evidence-base, the Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG) in Australia developed an evidence and consensus-based clinical pathway for screening, assessing and managing cancer-related anxiety and depression (ADAPT CP) and web-based resources to support it - staff training, patient education, cognitive-behavioural therapy and a management system (ADAPT Portal). The ADAPT Portal manages patient screening and prompts staff to follow the recommendations of the ADAPT CP. This study compares the clinical and cost effectiveness of two implementation strategies (varying in resource intensiveness), designed to encourage adherence to the ADAPT CP over a 12-month period. METHODS This cluster randomised controlled trial will recruit 12 cancer service sites, stratified by size (large versus small), and randomised at site level to a standard (Core) versus supported (Enhanced) implementation strategy. After a 3-month period of site engagement, staff training and site tailoring of the ADAPT CP and Portal, each site will "Go-live", implementing the ADAPT CP for 12 months. During the implementation phase, all eligible patients will be introduced to the ADAPT CP as routine care. Patient participants will be registered on the ADAPT Portal to complete screening for anxiety and depression. Staff will be responsible for responding to prompts to follow the ADAPT CP. The primary outcome will be adherence to the ADAPT CP. Secondary outcomes include staff attitudes to and experiences of following the ADAPT CP, using the ADAPT Portal and being exposed to ADAPT implementation strategies, collected using quantitative and qualitative methods. Data will be collected at T0 (baseline, after site engagement), T1 (6 months post Go-live) and T2 (12 months post Go-live). DISCUSSION This will be the first cluster randomised trial to establish optimal levels of implementation effort and associated costs to achieve successful uptake of a clinical pathway within cancer care. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered prospectively with the ANZCTR on 22/3/2017. Trial ID ACTRN12617000411347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Melanie Price
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Lindy Masya
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Brian Kelly
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| | - Thomas F Hack
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.,CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Philip Beale
- Cancer Services for the Sydney Local Health District (Incorporating Royal Prince Alfred, Concord and Canterbury Hospitals, Campsie, NSW, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joseph Coll
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Patrick Kelly
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Melanie Lovell
- HammondCare Northern Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Grimison
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Shaw
- Charles Perkins Centre Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Jessica Cuddy
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Fiona White
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Butow P, Shaw J, Shepherd HL, Price M, Masya L, Kelly B, Rankin NM, Girgis A, Hack TF, Beale P, Viney R, Dhillon HM, Coll J, Kelly P, Lovell M, Grimison P, Shaw T, Luckett T, Cuddy J, White F. Comparison of implementation strategies to influence adherence to the clinical pathway for screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (ADAPT CP): study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1077. [PMID: 30404619 PMCID: PMC6223096 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4962-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health service change is difficult to achieve. One strategy to facilitate such change is the clinical pathway, a guide for clinicians containing a defined set of evidence-based interventions for a specific condition. However, optimal strategies for implementing clinical pathways are not well understood. Building on a strong evidence-base, the Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG) in Australia developed an evidence and consensus-based clinical pathway for screening, assessing and managing cancer-related anxiety and depression (ADAPT CP) and web-based resources to support it - staff training, patient education, cognitive-behavioural therapy and a management system (ADAPT Portal). The ADAPT Portal manages patient screening and prompts staff to follow the recommendations of the ADAPT CP. This study compares the clinical and cost effectiveness of two implementation strategies (varying in resource intensiveness), designed to encourage adherence to the ADAPT CP over a 12-month period. Methods This cluster randomised controlled trial will recruit 12 cancer service sites, stratified by size (large versus small), and randomised at site level to a standard (Core) versus supported (Enhanced) implementation strategy. After a 3-month period of site engagement, staff training and site tailoring of the ADAPT CP and Portal, each site will “Go-live”, implementing the ADAPT CP for 12 months. During the implementation phase, all eligible patients will be introduced to the ADAPT CP as routine care. Patient participants will be registered on the ADAPT Portal to complete screening for anxiety and depression. Staff will be responsible for responding to prompts to follow the ADAPT CP. The primary outcome will be adherence to the ADAPT CP. Secondary outcomes include staff attitudes to and experiences of following the ADAPT CP, using the ADAPT Portal and being exposed to ADAPT implementation strategies, collected using quantitative and qualitative methods. Data will be collected at T0 (baseline, after site engagement), T1 (6 months post Go-live) and T2 (12 months post Go-live). Discussion This will be the first cluster randomised trial to establish optimal levels of implementation effort and associated costs to achieve successful uptake of a clinical pathway within cancer care. Trial registration The study was registered prospectively with the ANZCTR on 22/3/2017. Trial ID ACTRN12617000411347
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Melanie Price
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Lindy Masya
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Brian Kelly
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Cancer Council NSW, Woolloomooloo, NSW, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| | - Thomas F Hack
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.,CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Philip Beale
- Cancer Services for the Sydney Local Health District (Incorporating Royal Prince Alfred, Concord and Canterbury Hospitals, Campsie, NSW, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joseph Coll
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Patrick Kelly
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Melanie Lovell
- HammondCare Northern Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Grimison
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Shaw
- Charles Perkins Centre Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Jessica Cuddy
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Fiona White
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jabbour J, Dhillon HM, Shepherd HL, Sundaresan P, Milross C, Clark JR. The relationship between role preferences in decision-making and level of psychological distress in patients with head and neck cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2018; 101:1736-1740. [PMID: 29866431 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Revised: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Is there a relationship between decision-making preferences and psychological distress? METHODS Patients who had received treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) at four institutions within NSW, Australia were invited to complete a single questionnaire. RESULTS Five hundred and ninety-seven patients completed the questionnaire. The majority of patients (308, 54%) preferred shared decision making. Significant predictors of a preference towards active decision making were education level (OR 2.1 for tertiary, p < 0.001), primary cancer site (OR 1.9 for thyroid compared to salivary gland, p = 0.024) and gender (OR 1.4 for female, p = 0.028). Mean psychological distress score on Kessler 6 (K6) was 9 (Range: 0-28). Significant predictors of psychological distress were age (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.001), primary site (p < 0.01), and decision preference (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION HNC patients who are either tertiary educated or female are more likely to prefer active involvement in decision-making. Psychological distress is more likely in patients actively involved in decision making, younger patients, and in females. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Patients experienced paternalistic decision-making, but most preferred active or a shared approached. Clinicians need to be aware of potential for psychological distress in active decision-makers and refer patients for psychosocial support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Jabbour
- St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (POCOG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-making, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (POCOG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-making, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Puma Sundaresan
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Chris Milross
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Services, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Clark
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schnitzler L, Smith SK, Shepherd HL, Shaw JM, Dong S, Turner RM, Sørensen K, Dhillon HM. What information is communicated by radiation therapists to patients during education sessions on the first day of treatment? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 28:e12911. [PMID: 30204270 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Revised: 05/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This study examined the content covered by radiation therapists (RTs) during education sessions; the frequency and types of questions asked by patients; and the relationship between patient characteristics and the number of questions asked. Fifty-eight education sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A coding scheme was developed to examine the frequency of topics covered. It comprised 16 topics under four themes: (a) treatment schedule, (b) procedural information, (c) treatment-related side effects and (d) who will be involved in treatment provision. All education sessions covered information about the treatment plan (n = 58, 100%), and the majority described procedural information about what happens in the treatment room (n = 56, 97%). Least information was given about who will be providing treatment. On average, patients asked a mean of 6 questions (SD = 4.95; range = 0-28). Most frequently asked questions concerned the general treatment (logistics, schedule), accounting for 67% of all questions asked. The least common types of questions were related to the impact of treatment (6%). There were no statistically significant differences in the total number of questions and patient demographics. Patients are provided with most, but not all, of the recommended information. Tailoring of information by RTs was enabled in response to questions asked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Schnitzler
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sian K Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joanne M Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Skye Dong
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robin M Turner
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jabbour J, Wykes J, Milross C, Sundaresan P, Ebrahimi A, Shepherd HL, Dhillon HM, Clark JR. Examining clinicians' perceptions of head and neck cancer (HNC) information. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2018; 14:e428-e433. [PMID: 29498200 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providing appropriate educational resources to patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) is important but challenging. The aim of this study was to determine Australian clinicians' perceptions of currently used HNC information resources. METHODS A purpose-designed questionnaire was disseminated electronically to clinician members of the Australian and New Zealand Head and Neck Cancer Society (ANZHNCS) and The Australian Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (ASOHNS). RESULTS Of the 648 clinicians invited, 112 responded to the survey (17.3% response rate). Overall, 85% utilized written information as their primary mode of patient education and 49% received information on treatment details. Areas for improvement include information provision, pain management, emerging risk factors, survivorship and side effects. The majority (66%) of clinicians had a preference for internet patient education materials. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians predominantly utilized written HNC information rather than multimedia or interactive resources. However, they expressed the desire to be able to deliver HNC information resources via an internet-based platform covering the psychosocial effects of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Jabbour
- St Vincent's hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James Wykes
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Chris Milross
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Services, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Puma Sundaresan
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Ardalan Ebrahimi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-making, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (POCOG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-making, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (POCOG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Clark
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Geerligs L, Rankin NM, Shepherd HL, Butow P. Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes. Implement Sci 2018; 13:36. [PMID: 29475440 PMCID: PMC5824580 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0726-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Translation of evidence-based interventions into hospital systems can provide immediate and substantial benefits to patient care and outcomes, but successful implementation is often not achieved. Existing literature describes a range of barriers and facilitators to the implementation process. This systematic review identifies and explores relationships between these barriers and facilitators to highlight key domains that need to be addressed by researchers and clinicians seeking to implement hospital-based, patient-focused interventions. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, PsychInfo, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL using search terms focused specifically on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of patient-focused interventions in hospital settings. To be eligible, papers needed to have collected formal data (qualitative or quantitative) that specifically assessed the implementation process, as experienced by the staff involved. RESULTS Of 4239 papers initially retrieved, 43 papers met inclusion criteria. Staff-identified barriers and facilitators to implementation were grouped into three main domains: system, staff, and intervention. Bi-directional associations were evident between these domains, with the strongest links evident between staff and intervention. CONCLUSIONS Researchers and health professionals engaged in designing patient-focused interventions need to consider barriers and facilitators across all three identified domains to increase the likelihood of implementation success. The interrelationships between domains are also crucial, as resources in one area can be leveraged to address barriers in others. These findings emphasize the importance of careful intervention design and pre-implementation planning in response to the specific system and staff context in order to increase likelihood of effective and sustainable implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION This review was registered on the PROSPERO database: CRD42017057554 in February 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Geerligs
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
- Sydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Level 6, 119-143 Missenden Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- Sydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Level 6, 119-143 Missenden Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Cancer Council NSW, PO Box 572, Sydney, NSW, 1340, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Sydney Catalyst Translational Cancer Research Centre, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Level 6, 119-143 Missenden Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making (CeMPED), The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Nutbeam D, Morony S, Smith SK, Dhillon HM, Trevenal L, Hayen A, Luxford K, McCaffery K. Developing Verbal Health Literacy with Adult Learners Through Training in Shared Decision-Making. Health Lit Res Pract 2017; 1:e257-e268. [PMID: 31294271 PMCID: PMC6607778 DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20171208-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health literacy skills are often assessed in relation to written health materials; however, many important communications are in other formats, especially verbal communication with health care providers. Objective This qualitative study sought to examine adult learners' experiences of developing verbal health literacy skills within an Australian adult basic education program, and to explore verbal communication and shared decision-making as a constituent domain of health literacy. Methods We conducted a semi-structured qualitative interview study between September and November 2014 with adult learners who had participated in a single-semester health literacy program that included an integrated shared decision-making component. We analyzed interviews using the Framework method; a matrix-based approach to thematic analysis. A hybrid process of inductive and deductive coding was used to interpret raw data. Key Results Interviewees were 22 students from six health literacy classes and ranged in age from 18 to 74 years (mean, 48.3). The majority were women (n = 15) and born outside Australia (n = 13). Health literacy was generally limited according to the Newest Vital Sign screening tool (n = 17). The health literacy program appeared to serve two key functions. First, it stimulated awareness that patients have the right to participate in decision-making concerning their treatment and care. Second, it facilitated verbal skill development across the domains of functional (e.g., communicating symptoms), communicative (e.g., asking questions to extract information about treatment options), and critical (e.g., integrating new knowledge with preferences) health literacy. Conclusions Our findings support the conceptualization of health literacy as a modifiable health asset that is subject to change and improvement as a result of deliberate intervention. Results reinforce verbal health literacy as an important component of health literacy, and draw attention to the hierarchy of verbal skills needed for consumers to become more actively involved in decisions about their health. We present a revised model of health literacy based on our findings. [Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2017;1(4):e257-e268.]. Plain Language Summary We developed a health literacy program for adults with lower literacy to help learners develop skills to talk to health care providers and share health decisions. The program was taught in Australian adult education settings. The article explores the range of health literacy skills needed for communication and decision-making in this study, and presents a model in which verbal skills are an important part of health literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Address correspondence to Kirsten McCaffery, PhD, Room 128B, Edward Ford Building (A27), The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Thompson R, Manski R, Donnelly KZ, Stevens G, Agusti D, Banach M, Boardman MB, Brady P, Colón Bradt C, Foster T, Johnson DJ, Li Z, Norsigian J, Nothnagle M, Olson AL, Shepherd HL, Stern LF, Tosteson TD, Trevena L, Upadhya KK, Elwyn G. Right For Me: protocol for a cluster randomised trial of two interventions for facilitating shared decision-making about contraceptive methods. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e017830. [PMID: 29061624 PMCID: PMC5665222 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the observed and theoretical advantages of shared decision-making in a range of clinical contexts, including contraceptive care, there remains a paucity of evidence on how to facilitate its adoption. This paper describes the protocol for a study to assess the comparative effectiveness of patient-targeted and provider-targeted interventions for facilitating shared decision-making about contraceptive methods. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a 2×2 factorial cluster randomised controlled trial with four arms: (1) video+prompt card, (2) decision aids+training, (3) video+prompt card and decision aids+training and (4) usual care. The clusters will be clinics in USA that deliver contraceptive care. The participants will be people who have completed a healthcare visit at a participating clinic, were assigned female sex at birth, are aged 15-49 years, are able to read and write English or Spanish and have not previously participated in the study. The primary outcome will be shared decision-making about contraceptive methods. Secondary outcomes will be the occurrence of a conversation about contraception in the healthcare visit, satisfaction with the conversation about contraception, intended contraceptive method(s), intention to use a highly effective method, values concordance of the intended method(s), decision regret, contraceptive method(s) used, use of a highly effective method, use of the intended method(s), adherence, satisfaction with the method(s) used, unintended pregnancy and unwelcome pregnancy. We will collect study data via longitudinal patient surveys administered immediately after the healthcare visit, four weeks later and six months later. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION We will disseminate results via presentations at scientific and professional conferences, papers published in peer-reviewed, open-access journals and scientific and lay reports. We will also make an anonymised copy of the final participant-level dataset available to others for research purposes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02759939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Thompson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Ruth Manski
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Kyla Z Donnelly
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Gabrielle Stevens
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Daniela Agusti
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | - Maureen B Boardman
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | | | - Tina Foster
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Deborah J Johnson
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Zhongze Li
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | - Melissa Nothnagle
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Ardis L Olson
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa F Stern
- Planned Parenthood Northern California, Concord, California, USA
| | - Tor D Tosteson
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Krishna K Upadhya
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Deciding to defunction after anterior resection can be difficult, requiring cognitive tools or heuristics. From our previous work, increasing age and risk-taking propensity were identified as heuristic biases for surgeons in Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ), and inversely proportional to the likelihood of creating defunctioning stomas. We aimed to assess these factors for colorectal surgeons in the British Isles, and identify other potential biases. METHODS The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) was invited to complete an online survey. Questions included demographics, risk-taking propensity, sensitivity to professional criticism, self-perception of anastomotic leak rate and propensity for creating defunctioning stomas. Chi-squared testing was used to assess differences between ACPGBI and CSSANZ respondents. Multiple regression analysis identified independent surgeon predictors of stoma formation. RESULTS One hundred fifty (19.2%) eligible members of the ACPGBI replied. Demographics between ACPGBI and CSSANZ groups were well-matched. Significantly more ACPGBI surgeons admitted to anastomotic leak in the last year (p < 0.001). ACPGBI surgeon age over 50 (p = 0.02), higher risk-taking propensity across several domains (p = 0.044), self-belief in a lower-than-average anastomotic leak rate (p = 0.02) and belief that the average risk of leak after anterior resection is 8% or lower (p = 0.007) were all independent predictors of less frequent stoma formation. Sensitivity to criticism from colleagues was not a predictor of stoma formation. CONCLUSIONS Unrecognised surgeon factors including age, everyday risk-taking, self-belief in surgical ability and lower probability bias of anastomotic leak appear to exert an effect on decision-making in rectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewan MacDermid
- Department of Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher J Young
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. .,University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Susan J Moug
- Department of Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Muscat DM, Morony S, Smith SK, Shepherd HL, Dhillon HM, Hayen A, Trevena L, Luxford K, Nutbeam D, McCaffery KJ. Qualitative insights into the experience of teaching shared decision making within adult education health literacy programmes for lower-literacy learners. Health Expect 2017; 20:1393-1400. [PMID: 28678433 PMCID: PMC5689229 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Enhancing health literacy can play a major role in improving healthcare and health across the globe. To build higher‐order (communicative/critical) health literacy skills among socially disadvantaged Australians, we developed a novel shared decision making (SDM) training programme for adults with lower literacy. The programme was delivered by trained educators within an adult basic education health literacy course. Objective To explore the experience of teaching SDM within a health literacy programme and investigate whether communicative/critical health literacy content meets learner needs and teaching and institutional objectives. Design and participants Qualitative interview study with 11 educators who delivered the SDM programme. Transcripts were analysed using the Framework approach; a matrix‐based method of thematic analysis. Results Teachers noted congruence in SDM content and the institutional commitment to learner empowerment in adult education. The SDM programme was seen to offer learners an alternative to their usual passive approach to healthcare decision making by raising awareness of the right to ask questions and consider alternative test/treatment options. Teachers valued a structured approach to training building on foundational skills, with language reinforcement and take‐home resources, but many noted the need for additional time to develop learner understanding and cover all aspects of SDM. Challenges for adult learners included SDM terminology, computational numerical risk tasks and understanding probability concepts. Discussion and conclusions SDM programmes can be designed in a way that both supports teachers to deliver novel health literacy content and empowers learners. Collaboration between adult education and healthcare sectors can build health literacy capacity of those most in need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Muscat
- University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Suzanne Morony
- University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sian K Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Hayen
- University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Luxford
- Clinical Excellence Commission, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Don Nutbeam
- University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jabbour J, Dhillon HM, Shepherd HL, Sundaresan P, Milross C, Clark JR. Challenges in Producing Tailored Internet Patient Education Materials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97:866-867. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
48
|
Jabbour J, Milross C, Sundaresan P, Ebrahimi A, Shepherd HL, Dhillon HM, Morgan G, Ashford B, Abdul-Razak M, Wong E, Veness M, Palme CE, Froggatt C, Cohen R, Ekmejian R, Tay J, Roshan D, Clark JR. Education and support needs in patients with head and neck cancer: A multi-institutional survey. Cancer 2017; 123:1949-1957. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2016] [Revised: 11/26/2016] [Accepted: 12/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Jabbour
- Central Clinical School; The University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Chris Milross
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Services; Chris O'Brien Lifehouse; Camperdown New South Wales Australia
- Department of Medicine; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Puma Sundaresan
- Department of Medicine; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital; Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Ardalan Ebrahimi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery; Liverpool Hospital; Liverpool New South Wales Australia
| | - Heather L. Shepherd
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-making; The University of Sydney; Camperdown New South Wales Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (POCOG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney; Camperdown New South Wales Australia
| | - Haryana M. Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-making; The University of Sydney; Camperdown New South Wales Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (POCOG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney; Camperdown New South Wales Australia
| | - Gary Morgan
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital; Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Bruce Ashford
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery; Wollongong Hospital; Wollongong New South Wales Australia
| | - Muzib Abdul-Razak
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital; Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Eva Wong
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital; Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Michael Veness
- Department of Medicine; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital; Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Carsten E. Palme
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital; Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Cate Froggatt
- Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute; Chris O'Brien Lifehouse; Camperdown New South Wales Australia
| | - Ruben Cohen
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery; Liverpool Hospital; Liverpool New South Wales Australia
| | - Rafael Ekmejian
- Department of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Kensington New South Wales Australia
| | - Jessica Tay
- Department of Medicine; University of New England; Armidale New South Wales Australia
| | - David Roshan
- Department of Medicine; University of New South Wales; Kensington New South Wales Australia
| | - Jonathan R. Clark
- Central Clinical School; The University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute; Chris O'Brien Lifehouse; Camperdown New South Wales Australia
- South West Clinical School; University of New South Wales; New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Schnitzler L, Smith SK, Shepherd HL, Shaw J, Dong S, Carpenter DM, Nguyen F, Dhillon HM. Communication during radiation therapy education sessions: The role of medical jargon and emotional support in clarifying patient confusion. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100:112-120. [PMID: 27542311 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Revised: 07/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radiation oncology consultations involve explanation of complex technical concepts using medical jargon. This study aimed to: analyse types and frequency of medical jargon that radiation therapists (RTs) use during education sessions; identify how patients seek clarification from RTs; and, explore RTs communication strategies. METHODS Education sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Medical jargon was analysed using MaxDictio (a vocabulary analysis programme). A distinction was made between specialised (specialised terms used in RT or cancer) and contextual jargon (common everyday words with a different meaning in RT). Qualitative data were analysed using Framework analysis. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients and 10 RTs participated. Contextual treatment jargon were the most frequently used jargon (32.2%) along with general medical terms (34.6%). Patients appeared uncertain about the number of treatments, side effects, and the risks of radiation. Patients sought clarification by asking RTs to explain or repeat information. RTs replaced jargon with a simpler word, used everyday analogies, and diagrams. CONCLUSION Use of medical jargon is common in RT education sessions. RTs used different jargon types to varying degrees, but contextual jargon dominated. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Training RTs how to tailor information to enhance patients' understanding would be beneficial. Future research exploring medical jargon used in other (non-) oncology settings is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Schnitzler
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Level 4, C25 Lowy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Sian K Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Level 4, C25 Lowy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Skye Dong
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Delesha M Carpenter
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Asheville, USA
| | - Frances Nguyen
- Nutrition and Chronic Disease Prevention, Harris County Public Health & Environmental Services, Houston, USA
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Morony S, Smith SK, Dhillon HM, Trevena L, Hayen A, Luxford K, Nutbeam D, McCaffery K. Can adults with low literacy understand shared decision making questions? A qualitative investigation. Patient Educ Couns 2016; 99:1796-1802. [PMID: 27344226 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2015] [Revised: 04/04/2016] [Accepted: 05/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Participation in shared decision-making (SDM) may be difficult for adults with lower literacy. Tools to support consumers to engage in SDM are rarely designed for or evaluated with adults with lower literacy and/or poor English language. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with 26 adults with lower literacy and/or poor English language skills to investigate (a) whether participants where able to read and understand two generic SDM consumer support tools (Smart Health Choices and AskShareKnow question-sets), (b) which question-set was easier for participants and, (c) perceived usefulness of the question-sets and barriers to use. Interviews were analysed using Framework Analysis. RESULTS Participants had difficulties understanding terms embedded within both the AskShareKnow and Smart Health Choices questions. Our findings suggest that the AskShareKnow question-set was easier for our participants than the Smart Health Choices questions, and clarification using a structured response was reasonably effective. While participants appreciated the usefulness of the questions, they identified important barriers to use. CONCLUSIONS Generic question-sets alone are not sufficient to support SDM for adults with lower literacy and/or poor English-language skills. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS To ensure that SDM is accessible to all, we must consider how best to support adults with low literacy and/or poor English-language skills to participate in this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Muscat
- The Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Suzanne Morony
- The Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sian K Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- The Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Hayen
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Luxford
- Patient-based care, Clinical Excellence Commission, NSW, Australia
| | - Don Nutbeam
- Office of the Vice Chancellor, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- The Screening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|