Developing and evaluating risk prediction models with panel current status data

Panel current status data arise frequently in biomedical studies when the occurrence of a particular clinical condition is only examined at several prescheduled visit times. Existing methods for analyzing current status data have largely focused on regression modeling based on commonly used survival models such as the proportional hazards model and the accelerated failure time model. However, these procedures have the limitations of being difficult to implement and performing sub-optimally in relatively small sample sizes. The performance of these procedures is also unclear under model misspecification. In addition, no methods currently exist to evaluate the prediction performance of estimated risk models with panel current status data. In this paper, we propose a simple estimator under a general class of nonparametric transformation (NPT) models by fitting a logistic regression working model and demonstrate that our proposed estimator is consistent for the NPT model parameter up to a scale multiplier. Furthermore, we propose nonparametric estimators for evaluating the prediction performance of the risk score derived from model fitting, which is valid regardless of the adequacy of the fitted model. Extensive simulation results suggest that our proposed estimators perform well in finite samples and the regression parameter estimators outperform existing estimators under various scenarios. We illustrate the proposed procedures using data from the Framingham Offspring Study.

Design and analysis of drop-the-losers studies using binary endpoints in the rare disease setting

The drop-the-losers design combines a phase 2 trial of k treatments and a confirmatory phase 3 trial under a single adaptive protocol, thereby gaining efficiency over a traditional clinical development approach. Such designs may be particularly useful in the rare disease setting, where conserving sample size is paramount, and control arms may not be feasible. We propose an unconditional exact likelihood (UEL) testing and inference procedure for these designs for a binary endpoint using small sample sizes, comparing its operating characteristics to existing methods. Additional practical considerations are evaluated, including the choice of stagewise sample sizes and effect of ties.

Estimation and inference for semi-competing risks based on data from a nested case-control study

In semi-competing risks, the occurrence of some non-terminal event is subject to a terminal event, usually death. While existing methods for semi-competing risks data analysis assume complete information on all relevant covariates, data on at least one covariate are often not readily available in practice. In this setting, for standard univariate time-to-event analyses, researchers may choose from several strategies for sub-sampling patients on whom to collect complete data, including the nested case-control study design. Here, we consider a semi-competing risks analysis through the reuse of data from an existing nested case-control study for which risk sets were formed based on either the non-terminal or the terminal event. Additionally, we introduce the supplemented nested case-control design in which detailed data are collected on additional events of the other type. We propose estimation with respect to a frailty illness-death model through maximum weighted likelihood, specifying the baseline hazard functions either parametrically or semi-parametrically via B-splines. Two standard error estimators are proposed: (i) a computationally simple sandwich estimator and (ii) an estimator based on a perturbation resampling procedure. We derive the asymptotic properties of the proposed methods and evaluate their small-sample properties via simulation. The designs/methods are illustrated with an investigation of risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease among N = 8838 patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, for which death is a significant competing risk.

Design and analysis of nested case-control studies for recurrent events subject to a terminal event

The process by which patients experience a series of recurrent events, such as hospitalizations, may be subject to death. In cohort studies, one strategy for analyzing such data is to fit a joint frailty model for the intensities of the recurrent event and death, which estimates covariate effects on the two event types while accounting for their dependence. When certain covariates are difficult to obtain, however, researchers may only have the resources to subsample patients on whom to collect complete data: one way is using the nested case-control (NCC) design, in which risk set sampling is performed based on a single outcome. We develop a general framework for the design of NCC studies in the presence of recurrent and terminal events and propose estimation and inference for a joint frailty model for recurrence and death using data arising from such studies. We propose a maximum weighted penalized likelihood approach using flexible spline models for the baseline intensity functions. Two standard error estimators are proposed: a sandwich estimator and a perturbation resampling procedure. We investigate operating characteristics of our estimators as well as design considerations via a simulation study and illustrate our methods using two studies: one on recurrent cardiac hospitalizations in patients with heart failure and the other on local recurrence and metastasis in patients with breast cancer.

Beyond Composite Endpoints Analysis: Semicompeting Risks as an Underutilized Framework for Cancer Research

BACKGROUND

Composite endpoints (CEP), such as progression-free survival, are commonly used in cancer research. Notwithstanding their popularity, however, CEP analyses suffer from a number of drawbacks, especially when death is combined with a nonterminal event (ie, progression or recurrence), exemplifying the semicompeting risks setting. We investigated the semicompeting risks framework as a complementary analysis strategy that avoids certain drawbacks of CEPs.

METHODS

The illness-death model under the semicompeting risks framework was compared with standard analysis approaches: CEP analyses and (separate) univariate analyses for each component endpoint. Data from a previously published phase III randomized clinical trial in metastatic colon cancer including 1419 participants in the N9741 trial (conducted between 1997 and 2003) were used to determine the impact of the loss of information associated with combining multiple endpoints, as well as of ignoring the potentially informative role of death. A simulation study was conducted to further explore these issues.

RESULTS

Failure to account for critical features of semicompeting risks data can lead to potentially severely misleading conclusions. Advantages of semicompeting risks analyses include a clear delineation of treatment effects on both events, the ability to draw conclusions about a patient's joint risk of the two events, and an assessment of the dependence between the two event types.

CONCLUSIONS

Embedding and analyzing component outcomes in the semicompeting risks framework, either as a supplement or alternative to CEP analyses, represents an important, underutilized, and feasible opportunity for cancer research.