1
|
Himelhoch S, Njie-Carr VPS, Peeples A, Awuah C, Federline A, Morton I. Evaluation of smoking cessation interventions for veterans in HIV clinics in the United States: a theory-informed concurrent mixed-method study. Health Psychol Behav Med 2021; 9:724-740. [PMID: 34484974 PMCID: PMC8409937 DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2021.1967159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Although veterans living with HIV infection are burdened with smoking-related morbidities, few studies have explored theory-informed, evidence-based smoking cessation interventions in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System. Method In this concurrent mixed-method study, we sought to better understand factors influencing the adoption of existing evidence-based smoking cessation interventions (reminders, telephone quit lines, pharmacological) for veterans in VA HIV clinics. We explored the alignment of the revised Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services Framework (i-PARIHS) with study results. Results Nineteen clinicians working at eight HIV clinics in the VA System participated in the study. Seven themes were identified with relative quantitative and qualitative data convergence of clinicians’ perceptions of the importance of integrating evidence-based smoking cessation interventions for veterans with HIV infection. Conclusion Identified themes underscore the need for clinicians to provide smoking cessation training, supportive care, and motivate veterans living with HIV infection to quit smoking. Integrating smoking cessation programs into HIV treatment plans in the veteran patient population is critical. Dedicated time to fully implement these efforts will maximize smoking cessation intervention efforts and will yield successful utilization and subsequent patient compliance. Importantly, combination strategies will ensure cessation program impact and sustainability. Trial registration:Netherlands National Trial Register identifier: ntr050..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth Himelhoch
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
| | | | - Amanda Peeples
- Education and Clinical Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Mental Illness Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Education and Academic Affairs, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Crystal Awuah
- School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amanda Federline
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Education and Academic Affairs, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morton I, Hurley B, Castillo EG, Tang L, Gilmore J, Jones F, Watkins K, Chung B, Wells K. Outcomes of two quality improvement implementation interventions for depression services in adults with substance use problems. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2020; 46:251-261. [PMID: 31935133 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1708085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: Comorbid depression and substance use disorders (SUDs) are associated with poor health and social outcomes disproportionately affecting under-resourced communities.Objectives: To test the hypothesis that a coalition approach to collaborative care (CC) for depression would improve outcomes of hazardous drinking and behavioral health hospitalizations, relative to technical assistance, for individuals with comorbid substance use problems. Substance use problems were defined by meeting criteria for DSM-IV substance abuse or dependence, hazardous drinking by AUDIT-C, or treatment in a SUD program within the prior 6 months.Methods: Two depression CC implementation approaches were compared: Resources for Services (RS) provided expert technical support for CC toolkits to individual programs. Community engagement and planning (CEP) supported multi-sector coalitions in collaborating in planning, adapting, implementing and monitoring CC toolkits. One thousand eighteen individuals with depression (PHQ-8 ≥10) enrolled. Regression analyses estimated intervention effects in participants with comorbid substance use problems (n = 588, 281 females, 307 males). Substance use problems were defined by meeting criteria for DSM-IV substance abuse or dependence, hazardous drinking by AUDIT-C, or treatment in a SUD program within the prior 6 months.Results: There were no significant baseline differences by intervention status among participants with depression and substance use problems. Intervention effects on primary outcomes including depression were not significant at 6 months. Compared to RS, CEP significantly reduced alcohol consumption (CEP = 1.6, RS = 2.1, p = .038), probability of behavioral health hospitalizations (OR = 0.50, p = .036), and use of specialty mental health visits (IRR = 0.52, p = .027), while increasing use of faith-based depression services (IRR = 3.4, p = .001).Conclusions: Given feasibility and possible benefits, CEP should be considered a promising approach to implementing depression CC with potential benefits to adults with comorbid substance use problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Morton
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brian Hurley
- Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Enrico G Castillo
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lingqi Tang
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Felica Jones
- Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Bowen Chung
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth Wells
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.,Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs West Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Castillo EG, Ijadi-Maghsoodi R, Shadravan S, Moore E, Mensah MO, Docherty M, Aguilera Nunez MG, Barcelo N, Goodsmith N, Halpin LE, Morton I, Mango J, Montero AE, Rahmanian Koushkaki S, Bromley E, Chung B, Jones F, Gabrielian S, Gelberg L, Greenberg JM, Kalofonos I, Kataoka SH, Miranda J, Pincus HA, Zima BT, Wells KB. Community Interventions to Promote Mental Health and Social Equity. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019; 21:35. [PMID: 30927093 PMCID: PMC6440941 DOI: 10.1007/s11920-019-1017-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We review recent community interventions to promote mental health and social equity. We define community interventions as those that involve multi-sector partnerships, emphasize community members as integral to the intervention, and/or deliver services in community settings. We examine literature in seven topic areas: collaborative care, early psychosis, school-based interventions, homelessness, criminal justice, global mental health, and mental health promotion/prevention. We adapt the social-ecological model for health promotion and provide a framework for understanding the actions of community interventions. RECENT FINDINGS There are recent examples of effective interventions in each topic area. The majority of interventions focus on individual, family/interpersonal, and program/institutional social-ecological levels, with few intervening on whole communities or involving multiple non-healthcare sectors. Findings from many studies reinforce the interplay among mental health, interpersonal relationships, and social determinants of health. There is evidence for the effectiveness of community interventions for improving mental health and some social outcomes across social-ecological levels. Studies indicate the importance of ongoing resources and training to maintain long-term outcomes, explicit attention to ethics and processes to foster equitable partnerships, and policy reform to support sustainable healthcare-community collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico G Castillo
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Roya Ijadi-Maghsoodi
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Population Behavioral Health, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- VA Health Service Research and Development Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sonya Shadravan
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Moore
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael O Mensah
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mary Docherty
- Harkness Fellow in Healthcare Policy and Practice, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Gabriela Aguilera Nunez
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicolás Barcelo
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nichole Goodsmith
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laura E Halpin
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Isabella Morton
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joseph Mango
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alanna E Montero
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sara Rahmanian Koushkaki
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Bromley
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- UCLA Department of Anthropology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bowen Chung
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Felica Jones
- Healthy African American Families II, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sonya Gabrielian
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- VA Health Service Research and Development Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lillian Gelberg
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- UCLA Jonathan Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jared M Greenberg
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- VA Health Service Research and Development Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ippolytos Kalofonos
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- UCLA International Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sheryl H Kataoka
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeanne Miranda
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- UCLA Jonathan Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Harold A Pincus
- Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York State Psychiatric Institute, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bonnie T Zima
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth B Wells
- Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Health Services and Society, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
- UCLA Jonathan Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Burkey MD, Hosein M, Morton I, Purgato M, Adi A, Kurzrok M, Kohrt BA, Tol WA. Psychosocial interventions for disruptive behaviour problems in children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2018; 59:982-993. [PMID: 29633271 DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most of the evidence for psychosocial interventions for disruptive behaviour problems comes from Western, high-income countries. The transferability of this evidence to culturally diverse, low-resource settings with few mental health specialists is unknown. METHODS We conducted a systematic review with random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of psychosocial interventions on reducing behaviour problems among children (under 18) living in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). RESULTS Twenty-six randomized controlled trials (representing 28 psychosocial interventions), evaluating 4,441 subjects, met selection criteria. Fifteen (54%) prevention interventions targeted general or at-risk populations, whereas 13 (46%) treatment interventions targeted children selected for elevated behaviour problems. Most interventions were delivered in group settings (96%) and half (50%) were administered by non-specialist providers. The overall effect (standardized mean difference, SMD) of prevention studies was -0.25 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.41 to -0.09; I2 : 78%) and of treatment studies was -0.56 (95% CI: -0.51 to -0.24; I2 : 74%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated effectiveness for child-focused (SMD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.14) and behavioural parenting interventions (SMD: -0.43; 95% CI: -0.66 to -0.20), and that interventions were effective across age ranges. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis supports the use of psychosocial interventions as a feasible and effective way to reduce disruptive behaviour problems among children in LMIC. Our study provides strong evidence for child-focused and behavioural parenting interventions, interventions across age ranges and interventions delivered in groups. Additional research is needed on training and supervision of non-specialists and on implementation of effective interventions in LMIC settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Burkey
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Isabella Morton
- University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marianna Purgato
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ahmad Adi
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mark Kurzrok
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Wietse A Tol
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burkey MD, Hosein M, Purgato M, Adi A, Morton I, Kohrt BA, Tol WA. Psychosocial interventions for disruptive behavioural problems in children living in low- and middle-income countries: study protocol of a systematic review. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e007377. [PMID: 25995239 PMCID: PMC4442205 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Disruptive behaviour disorders (DBDs) are among the most common forms of child psychopathology and have serious long-term academic, social, and mental health consequences worldwide. Psychosocial treatments are the first line of evidence-based treatments for DBDs, yet their effectiveness often varies according to patient sociodemographic characteristics, practice setting, and implementation procedures. While a large majority of the world's children live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), most studies have evaluated psychosocial treatments for DBDs in high-income Anglo countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the effects of psychosocial treatments for DBDs in children and adolescents (under age 18) diagnosed with oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, or other disruptive behavioural problems living in LMIC. The secondary objectives are to: (1) describe the range and types of psychosocial treatments used to address DBDs in LMIC and (2) identify key dissemination and implementation factors (adaptation processes, training/supervision processes, and financial costs). All controlled trials comparing psychosocial treatments versus waiting list, no treatment, or treatment as usual in children living in LMIC will be included. Studies will be identified using the methods outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines without restrictions on language, publication type, status, or date of publication. The primary outcome measures will be disruptive behavioural problems (eg, oppositionality, defiance, aggression or deceit). Secondary outcomes will be positive mental health outcomes (eg, prosocial behaviour), function impairment, institutionalisation (or hospitalisation), academic outcomes and caregiver outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study uses data from published studies; therefore ethical review is not required. Findings will be presented in a published manuscript. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42014015334.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Burkey
- Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Megan Hosein
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marianna Purgato
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Section of Psychiatry, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ahmad Adi
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Isabella Morton
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brandon A Kohrt
- Duke University Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wietse A Tol
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|