A balancing act: heterochromatin protein 1a and the Polycomb group coordinate their levels to silence chromatin in Drosophila

BACKGROUND

The small non-histone protein Heterochromatin protein 1a (HP1a) plays a vital role in packaging chromatin, most notably in forming constitutive heterochromatin at the centromeres and telomeres. A second major chromatin regulating system is that of the Polycomb/trithorax groups of genes which, respectively, maintain the repressed/activated state of euchromatin. Recent analyses suggest they affect the expression of a multitude of genes, beyond the homeotics whose alteration in expression lead to their initial discovery.

RESULTS

Our data suggest that early in Drosophila development, HP1a collaborates with the Polycomb/trithorax groups of proteins to regulate gene expression and that the two chromatin systems do not act separately as convention describes. HP1a affects the levels of both the Polycomb complexes and RNA polymerase II at promoters, as assayed by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis. Deposition of both the repressive (H3K27me3) and activating (H3K4me3) marks promoted by the Polycomb/trithorax group genes at gene promoters is affected. Additionally, depending on which parent contributes the null mutation of the HP1a gene, the levels of the H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 silencing marks at both promoters and heterochromatin are different. Changes in levels of the H3K27me3 and H3K9me3 repressive marks show a mostly reciprocal nature. The time around the mid-blastula transition, when the zygotic genome begins to be actively transcribed, appears to be a transition/decision point for setting the levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We find that HP1a, which is normally critical for the formation of constitutive heterochromatin, also affects the generation of the epigenetic marks of the Polycomb/trithorax groups of proteins, chromatin modifiers which are key to maintaining gene expression in euchromatin. At gene promoters, deposition of both the repressive H3K27me3 and activating H3K4me3 marks of histone modifications shows a dependence on HP1a. Around the mid-blastula transition, when the zygotic genome begins to be actively transcribed, a pivotal decision for the level of silencing appears to take place. This is also when the embryo organizes its genome into heterochromatin and euchromatin. A balance between the HP1a and Polycomb group silencing systems appears to be set for the chromatin types that each system will primarily regulate.

Long noncoding RNAs as metazoan developmental regulators

The study of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) is still in its infancy with more putative RNAs identified than those with ascribed functions. Defined as transcripts that are longer than 200 nucleotides without a coding sequence, their numbers are on the rise and may well challenge protein coding transcripts in number and diversity. lncRNAs are often expressed at low levels and their sequences are frequently poorly conserved, making it unclear if they are transcriptional noise or bonafide effectors. Despite these limitations, inroads into their functions are being made and it is clear they make a contribution in regulating all aspects of biology. The early verdict on their activity, however, suggests the majority function as chromatin modifiers. A good proportion show a connection to disease highlighting their importance and the need to determine their function. The focus of this review is on lncRNAs which influence developmental processes which in itself covers a large range of known activities.

An interactive network of long non-coding RNAs facilitates the Drosophila sex determination decision

Genome analysis in several eukaryotes shows a surprising number of transcripts which do not encode conventional messenger RNAs. Once considered noise, these non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) appear capable of controlling gene expression by various means. We find that Drosophila sex determination, specifically the master-switch gene Sex-lethal (Sxl), is regulated by long ncRNAs (>200nt). The lncRNAs influence the dose sensitive establishment promoter of Sxl, SxlPe, which must be activated to specify female sex. They are primarily from two regions, R1 and R2, upstream of SxlPe and show a dynamic developmental profile. Of the four lncRNA strands only one, R2 antisense, has its peak coincident with SxlPe transcription, suggesting that it may promote activation. Indeed, its expression is regulated by the X chromosome counting genes, whose dose determines whether SxlPe is transcribed. Transgenic lines which ectopically express each of the lncRNAs show they can act in trans, not only impacting the process of sex determination but also altering the levels of the other lncRNAs. Generally, expression of R1 is negative whereas R2 is positive to females. This ectopic expression also results in a change in the local chromatin marks, affecting the timing and strength of SxlPe transcription. The chromatin marks are those deposited by the Polycomb and trithorax groups of chromatin modifying proteins, which we find bind to the lncRNAs. We suggest that the increasing numbers of non-coding transcripts being identified are a harbinger of interacting networks similar to the one we describe.

Balancing sex chromosome expression and satisfying the sexes

Equalizing sex chromosome expression between the sexes when they have largely differing gene content appears to be necessary, and across species, is accomplished in a variety of ways. Even in birds, where the process is less than complete, a mechanism to reduce the difference in gene dose between the sexes exists. In early development, while the dosage difference is unregulated and still in flux, it is frequently exploited by sex determination mechanisms. The Drosophila female sex determination process is one clear example, determining the sexes based on X chromosome dose. Recent data show that in Drosophila, the female sex not only reads this gene balance difference, but at the same time usurps the moment. Taking advantage of the transient default state of male dosage compensation, the sex determination master-switch Sex-lethal which resides on the X, has its expression levels enhanced before it works to correct the gene imbalance. Intriguingly, key developmental genes which could create developmental havoc if their levels were unbalanced show more exquisite regulation, suggesting nature distinguishes them and ensures their expression is kept in the desirable range.

Cooperative and antagonistic contributions of two heterochromatin proteins to transcriptional regulation of the Drosophila sex determination decision

Eukaryotic nuclei contain regions of differentially staining chromatin (heterochromatin), which remain condensed throughout the cell cycle and are largely transcriptionally silent. RNAi knockdown of the highly conserved heterochromatin protein HP1 in Drosophila was previously shown to preferentially reduce male viability. Here we report a similar phenotype for the telomeric partner of HP1, HOAP, and roles for both proteins in regulating the Drosophila sex determination pathway. Specifically, these proteins regulate the critical decision in this pathway, firing of the establishment promoter of the masterswitch gene, Sex-lethal (Sxl). Female-specific activation of this promoter, Sxl(Pe), is essential to females, as it provides SXL protein to initiate the productive female-specific splicing of later Sxl transcripts, which are transcribed from the maintenance promoter (Sxl(Pm)) in both sexes. HOAP mutants show inappropriate Sxl(Pe) firing in males and the concomitant inappropriate splicing of Sxl(Pm)-derived transcripts, while females show premature firing of Sxl(Pe). HP1 mutants, by contrast, display Sxl(Pm) splicing defects in both sexes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays show both proteins are associated with Sxl(Pe) sequences. In embryos from HP1 mutant mothers and Sxl mutant fathers, female viability and RNA polymerase II recruitment to Sxl(Pe) are severely compromised. Our genetic and biochemical assays indicate a repressing activity for HOAP and both activating and repressing roles for HP1 at Sxl(Pe).

Requirement of male-specific dosage compensation in Drosophila females--implications of early X chromosome gene expression

Dosage compensation equates between the sexes the gene dose of sex chromosomes that carry substantially different gene content. In Drosophila, the single male X chromosome is hypertranscribed by approximately two-fold to effect this correction. The key genes are male lethal and appear not to be required in females, or affect their viability. Here, we show these male lethals do in fact have a role in females, and they participate in the very process which will eventually shut down their function—female determination. We find the male dosage compensation complex is required for upregulating transcription of the sex determination master switch, Sex-lethal, an X-linked gene which is specifically activated in females in response to their two X chromosomes. The levels of some X-linked genes are also affected, and some of these genes are used in the process of counting the number of X chromosomes early in development. Our data suggest that before the female state is set, the ground state is male and female X chromosome expression is elevated. Females thus utilize the male dosage compensation process to amplify the signal which determines their fate.

When substantially different, sex chromosomes present the challenge of not only gene dose inequity between the sexes, in the heterogametic sex where one chromosome (frequently the Y) carries few genes, but also an inequity relative to the autosomes which are diploid. Dosage compensation refers to the process which equates gene dose between the sexes. Recent results, however, indicate that the mammalian X chromosome avoids monosomy and has a level of expression that is two-fold relative to the autosomes. Hyperactive X chromosome expression in Caenorhabditis elegans has also been suggested, and dosage compensation in the hermaphrodite appears to lower expression of the X chromosomes to match autosome levels. We find that, before the female state is set in Drosophila, the X chromosomes may also express their genes at the two-fold male level and that this level of expression is used to female advantage to consolidate their sex determination. Together, the results suggest that elevated X chromosome expression may be the norm, and that the various dosage compensation processes different organisms utilize reflect a mechanism to counteract an initial hyperactive X chromosome state.

A large complex containing Patched and Smoothened initiates Hedgehog signaling in Drosophila

Hedgehog acts as an organizer during development. Its signaling involves the receptor Patched, signal transducer Smoothened and a cytoplasmic complex containing the transcription factor Cubitus interruptus tethered to the Smoothened carboxyl tail. Without Hedgehog, Patched represses Smoothened resulting in proteolysis of Cubitus interruptus to its repressor form. With Hedgehog, Patched repression of Smoothened is relieved and Cubitus interruptus is activated. Sex-lethal, the master switch for sex determination in Drosophila, has been shown to associate with Cubitus interruptus and the cytoplasmic components of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Additionally, Sex-lethal responds to the presence of Hedgehog in a Patched-dependent manner. The latter prompted us to examine the role of Patched in signaling. We find that Cubitus interruptus, Sex-lethal, Patched and Smoothened co-immunoprecipitate and co-fractionate, suggesting a large complex of both membrane and cytoplasmic components of the Hedgehog pathway. The entire complex is present at the plasma membrane and the association of Patched changes depending on the activation state of the pathway; it also is not female specific. Colocalization analyses suggest that Sex-lethal alters the endocytic cycling of the Hedgehog components and may augment the Hedgehog signal in females by decreasing the proteolytic cleavage of Cubitus interruptus, availing more of it for activation.

Splitting the Hedgehog signal: sex and patterning in Drosophila

Sex-lethal (Sxl), the Drosophilasex-determination master switch, is on in females and controls sexual development as a splicing and translational regulator. Hedgehog (Hh) is a secreted protein that specifies cell fate during development. Previous work has demonstrated that Sxl protein is part of the Hh cytoplasmic signaling complex and that Hh promotes Sxl nuclear entry. In the wing disc anterior compartment, Patched (Ptc), the Hh receptor, acts positively in this process. Here, it is shown that the levels and rate of nuclear entry of full-length Cubitus interruptus (Ci), the Hh signaling target, are enhanced by Sxl. This effect requires the cholesterol but not palmitoyl modification on Hh, and expands the zone of full-length Ci expression. Expansion of Ci activation and its downstream targets, particularly decapentaplegic the Drosophila TGFβ homolog, suggests a mechanism for generating different body sizes in the sexes; in Drosophila, females are larger and this difference is controlled by Sxl. Consistent with this proposal, discs expressing ectopic Sxl show an increase in growth. In keeping with the idea of the involvement of a signaling system, this growth effect by Sxl is not cell autonomous. These results have implications for all organisms that are sexually dimorphic and use Hh for patterning.

A positive role for Patched in Hedgehog signaling revealed by the intracellular trafficking of Sex-lethal, the Drosophila sex determination master switch

The sex determination master switch, Sex-lethal(Sxl), controls sexual development as a splicing and translational regulator. Hedgehog (Hh) is a secreted protein that specifies cell fate during development. We show that Sxl is in a complex that contains all of the known Hh cytoplasmic components, including Cubitus interruptus (Ci)the only known target of Hh signaling. Hh promotes the entry of Sxl into the nucleus in the wing disc. In the anterior compartment, the Hh receptor Patched(Ptc) is required for this effect, revealing Ptc as a positive effector of Hh. Some of the downstream components of the Hh signaling pathway also alter the rate of Sxl nuclear entry. Mutations in Suppressor of Fused or Fused with altered ability to anchor Ci are also impaired in anchoring Sxl in the cytoplasm. The levels, and consequently, the ability of Sxl to translationally repress downstream targets in the sex determination pathway, can also be adversely affected by mutations in Hh signaling genes. Conversely,overexpression of Sxl in the domain that Hh patterns negatively affects wing patterning. These data suggest that the Hh pathway impacts on the sex determination process and vice versa and that the pathway may serve more functions than the regulation of Ci.

Antizyme is a target of sex-lethal in the Drosophila germline and appears to act downstream of hedgehog to regulate sex-lethal and cyclin B

The sex determination master switch, Sex-lethal, has been shown to regulate the mitosis of early germ cells in Drosophila melanogaster. Sex-lethal is an RNA binding protein that regulates splicing and translation of specific targets in the soma, but the germline targets are unknown. In an experiment aimed at identifying targets of Sex-lethal in early germ cells, the RNA encoded by gutfeeling, the Drosophila homolog of Ornithine Decarboxylase Antizyme, was isolated. gutfeeling interacts genetically with Sex-lethal. It is not only a target of Sex-lethal, but also appears to regulate the nuclear entry and overall levels of Sex-lethal in early germ cells. This regulation of Sex-lethal by gutfeeling appears to occur downstream of the Hedgehog signal. We also show that Hedgehog, Gutfeeling, and Sex-lethal function to regulate Cyclin B, providing a link between Sex-lethal and mitosis.

The sex determination master switch, Sex-lethal, responds to Hedgehog signaling in theDrosophilagermline

Sex-lethal is the Drosophila melanogaster sex determination master switch. It is also required in female germ cells to control mitosis and meiotic recombination. As early germ cells mature, distinct changes in both Sex-lethal protein levels and localization occur. By manipulating the levels of Hedgehog and making germline clones of components in the hedgehog signaling pathway, we demonstrate that Hedgehog affects the nuclear translocation of Sex-lethal and the levels of the protein in early germ cells. This effect is mediated primarily through degradation. Consistent with the Hedgehog pathway regulating Sex-lethal, we find Sex-lethal in a complex with Fused and Costal-2, both downstream components of the pathway. This is the first demonstration that downstream components of the Hedgehog signaling pathway regulate a target other than Cubitus interruptus.

Sex determination in the Drosophila germline is dictated by the sexual identity of the surrounding soma

It has been suggested that sexual identity in the germline depends upon the combination of a nonautonomous somatic signaling pathway and an autonomous X chromosome counting system. In the studies reported here, we have examined the role of the sexual differentiation genes transformer (tra) and doublesex (dsx) in regulating the activity of the somatic signaling pathway. We asked whether ectopic somatic expression of the female products of the tra and dsx genes could feminize the germline of XY animals. We find that Tra(F) is sufficient to feminize XY germ cells, shutting off the expression of male-specific markers and activating the expression of female-specific markers. Feminization of the germline depends upon the constitutively expressed transformer-2 (tra-2) gene, but does not seem to require a functional dsx gene. However, feminization of XY germ cells by Tra(F) can be blocked by the male form of the Dsx protein (Dsx(M)). Expression of the female form of dsx, Dsx(F), in XY animals also induced germline expression of female markers. Taken together with a previous analysis of the effects of mutations in tra, tra-2, and dsx on the feminization of XX germ cells in XX animals, our findings indicate that the somatic signaling pathway is redundant at the level tra and dsx. Finally, our studies call into question the idea that a cell-autonomous X chromosome counting system plays a central role in germline sex determination.

Sex-specific control of Sex-lethal is a conserved mechanism for sex determination in the genus Drosophila

In D. melanogaster the binary switch gene Sex-lethal (Sxl) plays a pivotal role in somatic sex determination -- when the Sxl gene is on the female pathway is followed, while the male pathway is followed when the gene is off. In the present study we have asked whether the Sxl gene is present in other species of the genus Drosophila and whether it is subject to a similar sex-specific on-off regulation. Sxl proteins were found in all of the drosophilids examined, and they display a sex-specific pattern of expression. Furthermore, characterization of the Sxl gene in the distant drosophilan relative, D. virilis, reveals that the structure and sequence organization of the gene has been well conserved and that, like melanogaster, alternative RNA processing is responsible for its sex-specific expression. Hence, this posttranscriptional on-off regulatory mechanism probably existed before the separation of the drosophilan and sophophoran subgenera and it seems likely that Sxl functions as a sex determination switch gene in most species in the Drosophila genus. Although alternative splicing appears to be responsible for the on-off regulation of the Sxl gene in D. virilis, this species is unusual in that Sxl proteins are present not only in females but also in males. The D. virilis female and male proteins appear to be identical over most of the length except for the amino-terminal approx. 25 aa which are encoded by the differentially spliced exons. In transcriptionally active polytene chromosomes, the male and female proteins bind to the same cytogenetic loci, including the sites corresponding to the D. virilis Sxl and tra genes. Hence, though the male proteins are able to interact with appropriate target pre-mRNAs, they are apparently incapable of altering the splicing pattern of these pre-mRNAs.

Splicing of the drosophila Sex-lethal early transcripts involves exon skipping that is independent of Sex-lethal protein

mRNAs from the early Sex-lethal promoter, Sxl-Pe, encode embryonic Sxl proteins that function to activate the Sxl autoregulatory loop. They do so by directing the female-specific splicing of the first transcripts expressed from the late or maintenance promoter, Sxl-Pm. The early promoter is located, however, upstream not downstream of the translation terminating male-specific exon, L3, and upstream of the second Sxl-Pm exon, L2. If the Sxl proteins expressed from Sxl-Pe are to provide the mechanism for bypassing the normal requirement for Sxl protein in the female-specific splicing of transcripts from Sxl-Pm, then what is the mechanism for skipping L2 and L3 in the processing of transcripts from Sxl-Pe? In the studies reported here, we have generated a report construct to examine the splicing of Sxl-Pe transcripts. Our results indicate that neither specific maternal products, Sxl protein, nor an X chromosome to autosome ratio of 1 are required for the processing of the embryonic mRNAs. We also found that none of the three genes, snf, virilizer, and fl(2)d, which when mutated alter the female-specific processing of Sxl-Pm transcripts, alter the generation of the early splice. Skipping to intervening exons to generate an open reading frame that will encode the Sxl early proteins appears to be an intrinsic property of initiating the early Sxl RNAs within the first intron of the Sxl-Pm maintenance transcription unit.

Selection and maintenance of sexual identity in the Drosophila germline

Unlike sex determination in the soma, which is an autonomous process, sex determination in the germline of Drosophila has both inductive and autonomous components. In this paper, we examined how sexual identity is selected and maintained in the Drosophila germline. We show that female-specific expression of genes in the germline is dependent on a somatic signaling pathway. This signaling pathway requires the sex-non-specific transformer 2 gene but, surprisingly, does not appear to require the sex-specific genes, transformer and doublesex. Moreover, in contrast to the soma where pathway initiation and maintenance are independent processes, the somatic signaling pathway appears to function continuously from embryogenesis to the larval stages to select and sustain female germline identity. We also show that the primary target for the somatic signaling pathway in germ cells can not be the Sex-lethal gene.

The Drosophila orb RNA-binding protein is required for the formation of the egg chamber and establishment of polarity

The orb gene of Drosophila encodes sex-specific germ-line proteins that contain two RRM-type RNA-binding domains. Here we report the distribution of Orb protein in wild-type, tumorous, and orb mutant ovaries. The wild-type distribution of Orb protein during oogenesis resembles that of its RNA, preferentially accumulating in the cytoplasm of the developing oocyte shortly after the formation of the 16-cell cyst. As anticipated from its germ-line expression, mutations in orb lead to female sterility. Analysis of the effect of orb mutants on the distribution of RNAs known to be required for oocyte differentiation and polarity suggests that orb functions in RNA localization at multiple points during oogenesis. In addition, phenotypic characterization of the orb mutants indicates that the gene is required early in oogenesis for formation of the 16-cell cyst. It then functions in the differentiation of the oocyte and is required for the three-dimensional reorganization of the germ cells in the cyst as well as for the establishment of normal germ-line-soma interactions in the egg chamber.

Sex-lethal autoregulation requires multiple cis-acting elements upstream and downstream of the male exon and appears to depend largely on controlling the use of the male exon 5' splice site

The on/off state of the binary switch gene Sex-lethal (Sxl), which controls somatic sexual development in Drosophila melanogaster, is regulated at the level of alternative splicing. In males, in which the gene is off, the default splicing machinery produces nonfunctional mRNAs; in females, in which the gene is on, the autoregulatory activity of the Sxl proteins directs the splicing machinery to produce functional mRNAs. We have used germ line transformation to analyze the mechanism of default and regulated splicing. Our results demonstrate that a blockage mechanism is employed in Sxl autoregulation. However, in contrast to transformer, in which Sxl appears to function by preventing the interaction of splicing factors with the default 3' splice site, a different strategy is used in autoregulation. (i) Multiple cis-acting elements, both upstream and downstream of the male exon, are required. (ii) These cis-acting elements are distant from the splice sites they regulate, suggesting that the Sxl protein cannot function in autoregulation by directly competing with splicing factors for interaction with the regulated splice sites. (iii) The 5' splice site of the male exon appears to be dominant in regulation while the 3' splice site plays a subordinate role.

Expression of the Sex-lethal gene is controlled at multiple levels during Drosophila oogenesis

In addition to controlling somatic sexual development in Drosophila melanogaster, the Sex-lethal (Sxl) gene is required for proper differentiation of female germ cells. To investigate its role in germ-line development, we have examined the expression of Sxl in wild-type ovaries and ovaries that are defective in early steps of germ cell differentiation. As in the soma, the basic mechanism for on/off regulation of Sxl relies on sex-specific processing of its transcripts in germ cells. One class of female-sterile mutations, which includes fs(1)1621 and the tumorous-ovary-producing allele of the ovarian tumor gene, otu1, is defective in the splicing process. These mutants have germ lines with high amounts of Sxl RNA spliced in the male mode and a severe reduction of protein levels in the germ cells. Another class of female-sterile mutations produces a phenotype similar to that seen in fs(1)1621 and otu1 but appears to express normal levels of Sxl protein in the germ cells. However, this second class does not show the changes in protein distribution normally observed in wild-type germ cells. In the wild-type germarium, the non-differentiated germ cells show a strong cytoplasmic accumulation of Sxl protein followed, as the germ cells differentiate, by a dramatic reduction and redistribution of the protein into nuclear foci. Interestingly, two female-sterile alleles of Sxl, Sxlf4 and Sxlf5 belong to the second class, which shows persistent cytoplasmic accumulation of Sxl protein. These Sxl female-sterile mutants encode an altered protein indicating that Sxl regulates processes that eventually lead to the changes in Sxl protein distribution. Lastly, we demonstrate that during the final stages of oogenesis several mechanisms must operate to prevent the progeny from inheriting Sxl protein. Conceivably, this regulation safeguards the inadvertent activation of the Sxl autoregulatory feedback loop in the male zygote.

Regulated splicing of the Drosophila sex-lethal male exon involves a blockage mechanism

In Drosophila melanogaster, sex determination in somatic cells is controlled by a cascade of genes whose expression is regulated by alternative splicing [B. S. Baker, Nature (London) 340:521-524, 1989; J. Hodgkin, Cell 56:905-906, 1989]. The master switch gene in this hierarchy is Sex-lethal. Sex-lethal is turned on only in females, and an autoregulatory feedback loop which controls alternative splicing maintains this state (L. R. Bell, J. I. Horabin, P. Schedl, and T. W. Cline, Cell 65:229-239, 1991; L. N. Keyes, T. W. Cline, and P. Schedl, Cell 68:933-943, 1992). Sex-lethal also promotes female differentiation by controlling the splicing of RNA from the next gene in the hierarchy, transformer. Sosnowski et al. (B. A. Sosnowski, J. M. Belote, and M. McKeown, Cell 58:449-459, 1989) have shown that the mechanism for generating female transformer transcripts is not through the activation of the alternative splice site but by the blockage of the default splice site. We have tested whether an activation or a blockage mechanism is involved in Sex-lethal autoregulation. The male exon of Sex-lethal with flanking splice sites was placed into the introns of heterologous genes. Our results support the blockage mechanism. The poly(U) run at the male exon 3' splice site is required for sex-specific splicing. However, unlike transformer, default splicing to the male exon is sensitive to the sequence context within which the exon resides. This and the observation that the splice signals at the exon are suboptimal are discussed with regard to alternate splicing.

Positive autoregulation of sex-lethal by alternative splicing maintains the female determined state in Drosophila

Sex-lethal is a binary switch gene that controls all aspects of Drosophila sexual dimorphism. It must be active in females and inactive in males. The on/off regulation reflects alternative RNA splicing in which full-length proteins are produced only in females. Here we investigate the role of Sxl in maintaining sexual pathway commitments. By ectopic expression of a female Sxl cDNA in transgenic male flies, we show that Sxl protein induces a rapid switch from male- to female-specific splicing. The ectopically expressed Sxl protein wil trans-activate an endogenous wild-type Sxl gene. This establishes a feedback loop in which Sxl proteins induce their own synthesis by directing the female-specific splicing of Sxl transcripts. We conclude that the female determined state is maintained by Sxl through positive autoregulation, while the male determined state is maintained by default.

An amino acid sequence which directs membrane insertion causes loss of membrane potential

A 55-amino acid segment, normally present between residues 241 and 295 of the 348-residue gene I protein of the filamentous bacteriophage f1, acts as an internal signal sequence for gene I protein or, when present in fusion proteins, for EcoRI endonuclease or alkaline phosphatase. The resulting proteins are inserted so that they span the membrane with sequences on the amino side of the 55-residue segment in the cytoplasm and those near the carboxy side outside the cytoplasmic membrane. The presence of these proteins in the membrane results in the rapid inhibition of cell growth, probably from a loss of the membrane potential. We describe some of the elements in this 55-residue segment that appear to be crucial for its interaction with the membrane.

Morphogenesis of f1 filamentous bacteriophage. Increased expression of gene I inhibits bacterial growth

We have cloned the gene I sequence of the filamentous bacteriophage f1 downstream from the lambda leftward promoter on a plasmid that also contains the temperature-sensitive lambda repressor, cI857. Temperature induction of gene I protein (pI) resulted in rapid cessation of growth. This inhibition appears to involve a rapid decrease in synthesis of host protein and RNA. The ability of pI to cause this inhibition is not dependent on thioredoxin, a host factor that is necessary for phage morphogenesis and has been shown by genetic data to interact with pI. The inhibition does not appear to be mediated by the amino half of the protein, as induction of an identical plasmid construction of an amber mutant positioned two-thirds along gene I, does not affect cell growth. Analysis of the transcription products from the cloned gene I confirmed previous suggestions that a transcription terminator exists in the amino-terminal portion of the gene. In addition, there is no detectable promoter activity in the 152 bases immediately upstream from the gene. These data and the inability to overproduce pI argue for down-regulation of pI production. Radioactive labeling of proteins in maxi-cells and normal Escherichia coli cells identifies pI as a protein of about 39,000 Mr that partitions with the cell envelope. Pulse-chase experiments suggest that pI is not processed to any appreciable extent.

Temperature-inducible amber suppressor: construction of plasmids containing the Escherichia coli serU- (supD-) gene under control of the bacteriophage lambda pL promoter

An Escherichia coli DNA fragment containing the structural gene serU132 for the nonsense suppressor tRNASer2am was identified and purified by being cloned into a plasmid vector. Information obtained from DNA sequence analysis was used to select a serU132 fragment for insertion downstream from the bacteriophage lambda pL promoter in two pBR322-lambda derivatives. In nonsense mutant strains bearing the resulting serU132 hybrid plasmids, the presence of the lambda cI857 repressor gene carried on the same plasmid or in a prophage genome permits thermal regulation of suppressor synthesis.