1
|
Rahman EZ, Beck KD, Wong RW, Sohn JH, Diaz-Rohena RD, Harper CA. Bilateral Combined Rhegmatogenous and Tractional Retinal Detachments Due to Persistent High-Titer Syphilis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024; 55:46-50. [PMID: 38189796 DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20231023-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
A 23-year-old man developed bilateral rhegmatogenous retinal detachments secondary to high-titer ocular syphilis. The patient's titer increased four-fold after completing a 14-day course of intravenous penicillin (IVP). He underwent bilateral pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil fill in both eyes. In this article, the authors propose an updated treatment method for patients with advanced ocular syphilis that includes oral doxycycline for 30 days following 14 days of IVP to optimally minimize the patient's infectious burden. Following surgery and this new treatment regime, this patient's best-corrected visual acuity 10 weeks postoperatively measured 20/50 in the right eye and 20/30 in the left eye. This case highlights a rare but devastating complication of ocular syphilis. We suggest the addition of oral doxycycline to IVP for patients with syphilis titers ≥ 1:256, HIV co-infection, and presence of posterior retinitis. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:46-50.].
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahearn BE, Nguyen H, Sohn JH. Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Requiring Vitrectomy Over Clinic Management During COVID-19: Impact of Delayed Care. Korean J Ophthalmol 2023; 37:292-298. [PMID: 37336513 PMCID: PMC10427906 DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2022.0147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the impact of delayed retinal clinical care during the COVID-19 pandemic on the severity of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and drivers of follow-up delay. We compared disease severity and follow-up rates of PDR patients requiring vitrectomy to those managed nonsurgically, and identified factors associated with need for vitrectomy. METHODS The study included 739 patients diagnosed with PDR between January 1, 2018, and March 4, 2021, categorized into two groups based on outcome: vitrectomy nonvitrectomy. Statistical methods such as t-tests and chi-square tests were used to analyze differences in disease severity and follow-up rates before and after COVID-19 shutdown. A multivariate regression evaluated factors leading to vitrectomy by comparing initial ETDRS (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study) DR staging, disease stability, DR progression, proliferative complications, appointment intervals, follow-up variance, rescheduling rate, and no-show rate. RESULTS Of the 739 patients, 202 required vitrectomy, 537 were managed nonsurgically. The vitrectomy group had more severe or unstable disease before shutdown. The interval between patient visits preshutdown was 29.76 ± 45.11 days in the vitrectomy group and 40.23 ± 56.73 days in the nonvitrectomy group (p < 0.001). Both groups experienced a significant increase in appointment intervals after shutdown, with the vitrectomy group having a greater increase. Both groups had significantly increased rescheduling rate and minimally increased no-show rate. Patient-directed rescheduling was the main driver of appointment delays. Disease factors, such as tractional retinal detachment and higher ETDRS DR staging, increased the odds of vitrectomy, while appointment burden and follow-up variability had a minimal impact. CONCLUSIONS Patients with more severe PDR and greater delay in appointments due to the pandemic were more likely to require vitrectomy for proliferative complications. Patient-directed rescheduling was identified as the main driver of care delays, as opposed to clinic-directed rescheduling. This study highlights the importance of maintaining regular follow-up appointments for PDR patients during pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bennett E Ahearn
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Huy Nguyen
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bae LJ, Kang GB, Kim M, Lee GS, Sohn JH, Nam CH, Cho BI. Diagnosis of ultrafast surface dynamics of thin foil targets irradiated by intense laser pulses. Opt Express 2023; 31:5767-5776. [PMID: 36823849 DOI: 10.1364/oe.474759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The temporal modulation of an electron bunch train accelerated from a foil target irradiated by an intense laser pulse is studied by measuring the coherent transition radiation (CTR) from the rear surface of a target. We experimentally obtained CTR spectra from a 1 µm thick foil target irradiated at a maximum intensity of 6.5 × 1019 W/cm2. Spectral redshifts of the emitted radiation corresponding to increases in laser intensity were observed. These measurements were compared with the theoretical calculation of CTR spectra considering ultrafast surface dynamics, such as plasma surface oscillation and relativistically induced transparency. Plasma surface oscillations induce a spectral redshift, while relativistic transparency causes a spectral blueshift. Both effects are required to find reasonable agreement with the experiment over the entire range of laser intensities.
Collapse
|
4
|
Soekamto C, Rosignoli L, Zhu C, Johnson DA, Sohn JH, Bahadorani S. Visual outcomes of acute bacterial endophthalmitis treated with adjuvant intravitreal dexamethasone: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Indian J Ophthalmol 2022; 70:2835-2841. [PMID: 35918923 PMCID: PMC9672767 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_955_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjunctive treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis with intravitreal steroids is a topic of controversy among many ophthalmologists. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of intravitreal dexamethasone on the visual outcomes of patients with acute bacterial endophthalmitis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to include studies on the visual outcomes of adjuvant intravitreal dexamethasone in patients with acute bacterial endophthalmitis. The review is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol. A total of 1545 articles met our search criteria and after further review, two randomized controlled trials and three retrospective case series were included in the final analysis. A total of 126 eyes were treated with intravitreal dexamethasone combined with antibiotics, and another 139 eyes were treated with antibiotics alone. All cases of endophthalmitis were post-operative or post-intravitreal injection, with pooled results demonstrating no visual benefit with supplementation of intravitreal dexamethasone. Our meta-analysis does not show any visual benefit from steroid supplementation and yet, considering a relatively small number of patients included in each study, larger randomized controlled trials are required to further clarify the role of steroids in the treatment of acute bacterial endophthalmitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Soekamto
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Luca Rosignoli
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Christopher Zhu
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Daniel A Johnson
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Sepehr Bahadorani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosignoli L, Chu ER, Carter JE, Johnson DA, Sohn JH, Bahadorani S. The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Central Retinal Artery Occlusion - A Retrospective Study, Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Korean J Ophthalmol 2021; 36:108-113. [PMID: 34743490 PMCID: PMC9013555 DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2021.0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a vision-threatening condition with a potentially poor visual prognosis. Many different treatment modalities are suggested but controversy remains regarding effectiveness of these treatments. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis in addition to analyzing retrospective data at our own tertiary care center regarding effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in treatment of CRAO. Methods The PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library are searched from the date of database inception to September 2021 to conduct a review based on the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis), evaluating the role of HBOT in visual recovery of CRAO patients. In addition, a retrospective chart review of patients clinically diagnosed with CRAO at our university-based hospital (University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX, USA) from year 2011 to 2021 was conducted. Results After a review of 376 articles, three articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis, where a total of 207 patients received HBOT versus 89 patients that did not receive any form of oxygen therapy. Analysis of these results demonstrate that HBOT in CRAO patients does not enhance the final visual outcome (p = 0.83). Similar conclusion was also drawn from retrospective analysis of 48 patients (15 HBOT versus 33 controls) at our tertiary care center, where no visual benefit was observed in the HBOT group. Conclusions HBOT does not appear to improve final visual outcome and concerns remain regarding adverse reactions such as barotrauma and generalized seizures. Large, randomized studies are required for further understanding of the role of HBOT in treatment of CRAO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Rosignoli
- Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Health at San Antonio San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Edward R Chu
- Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Health at San Antonio San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - John E Carter
- Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Health at San Antonio San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Daniel A Johnson
- Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Health at San Antonio San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Health at San Antonio San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Sepehr Bahadorani
- Department of Ophthalmology University of Texas Health at San Antonio San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rahman EZ, Beck KD, Waldman CW, Sohn JH. Unusual presentation of CREST retinal vasculitis. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2021; 23:101172. [PMID: 34368496 PMCID: PMC8326344 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2021.101172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report a case of CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud's phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, telangiectasias) syndrome-induced retinal vasculitis in the setting of ocular inflammation soon after recent micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (mTS-CPC). Observations Our patient developed CREST associated retinal vasculitis in both eyes (right > left) eight days after receiving mTS-CPC in her left eye. There was initial concern for sympathetic ophthalmia due to the resulting bilateral inflammation. The patient was treated with prednisone with resolution of her symptoms. Conclusions This is the first case of CREST retinal vasculitis that appears to be directly triggered by inflammation caused by mTS-CPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Effie Z Rahman
- University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Kinley D Beck
- University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Corey W Waldman
- University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Soekamto C, Chu ER, Johnson DA, Sohn JH, Bahadorani S. Protective Role of 360° Laser Retinopexy in Patients with Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Korean J Ophthalmol 2021; 35:215-222. [PMID: 34120420 PMCID: PMC8200595 DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2021.0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Visual impairment from retinal re-detachment could be debilitating. The aim of this review is to evaluate the role of 360° laser retinopexy on success rate of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair by a meta-analysis study. METHODS The PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched comprehensively from the date of database inception to January 2021, evaluating the role of 360° laser retinopexy in visual and anatomical success rate of RRD repair. This review was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocols. RESULTS Among 202 articles screened for eligibility, six studies were found to be eligible for inclusion in our final analysis. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that prophylactic treatment with circumferential laser photocoagulation has no significant effect on the initial rate of retinal re-detachment or final best-corrected visual acuity following pars plana vitrectomy repair of RRD. Subgroup analysis of studies (n = 3) with 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, however, favors attachment rate in patients undergoing 360° prophylactic laser treatment. CONCLUSIONS Three hundred and sixty degree laser retinopexy appears to have favorable outcomes in patients undergoing 23-gauge retinal detachment repair. This protective effect, however, is not apparent with inclusion of 20-gauge vitrectomy studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Soekamto
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Edward R Chu
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Daniel A Johnson
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Sepehr Bahadorani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bahadorani S, Sohn J. Use of "Chopstick" Technique for Enhanced Visualization of the Vitrectomy Port in Endophthalmitis Patients. Korean J Ophthalmol 2020; 34:418-419. [PMID: 33099566 PMCID: PMC7597621 DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2020.0059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sepehr Bahadorani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - JeongHyeon Sohn
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fortepiani LA, Adams K, Varela C, Akimov NP, Sohn JH, Renteria RC. PKA Inhibition Mimics Dopamine 2 receptor‐driven Inhibition of VEGF‐induced Proliferation of Human Retinal Microvascular Endothelial Cells. FASEB J 2020. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.07000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Ahn D, Lee GJ, Sohn JH. Recurrence following hemithyroidectomy in patients with low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma. Br J Surg 2020; 107:687-694. [PMID: 32026467 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the incidence, patterns and risk factors for recurrence after hemithyroidectomy in patients with low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and verified the predictive role of the risk staging systems in current use. METHODS The clinicopathological characteristics and risk categories were analysed according to recurrence in patients who underwent hemithyroidectomy for low- and intermediate-risk conventional PTC, and were followed up for at least 24 months. Five risk staging systems were used to stratify risk: the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) system; Age, Metastases, Extent and Size (AMES) system; Metastases, Age, Complete resection, Invasion and Size (MACIS) system; Grade, Age, Metastases, Extent and Size (GAMES) system; and the eighth AJCC system. RESULTS The study included 561 patients; 93·9 per cent of the study population (527 of 561) had a papillary thyroid microcarcinoma 1 cm or smaller in size. At a mean follow-up of 83 months, 25 patients (4·5 per cent) had recurrence; among these patients, 23 (92%) presented with a remaining thyroid lobe. Multifocality was significantly associated with recurrence in univariable and multivariable analyses (adjusted hazard ratio 3·16, 95 per cent c.i. 1·25 to 7·98; P = 0·015). Disease-free survival (DFS) varied according to multifocality (P = 0·010). The five risk staging systems were not associated with recurrence, and their Harrell's C-index ranged from 0·500 to 0·531. DFS rates did not differ between the risk categories in each system. CONCLUSION Although the recurrence rate after hemithyroidectomy in patients with low- and intermediate-risk PTC was low, meticulous follow-up focusing on the remaining thyroid lobe is needed for early detection and timely management of recurrence. The risk scoring systems in current use have no predictive role in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ahn
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kyungpook National University, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Korea
| | - G J Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kyungpook National University, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Korea
| | - J H Sohn
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kyungpook National University, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bahadorani S, Maclean K, Wannamaker K, Chu ER, Gresores N, Sohn JH, Diaz-Rohena R, Singer MA. Treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy with topical NSAIDs. Clin Ophthalmol 2019; 13:1543-1548. [PMID: 31616132 PMCID: PMC6699520 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s202047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is a common retinopathy that is often observed until resolution. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on timing of CSCR recovery. Methods An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted on patients that had been diagnosed with a new-onset, symptomatic case of CSCR. Patients were either observed only (13 untreated eyes) or treated with topical bromfenac or nepafenac (14 eyes) over an average of about a 4-5 week follow-up period. Results There was no statistical significance between central macular thickness (CMT) and visual acuity of treatment and control groups at the initial presentation. However, at the follow-up visit, CMT reductions in the treatment group were significantly higher than in the control group (p<0.006). Conclusion Use of topical NSAIDs in the treatment of acute CSCR leads to a faster rate of reduction in the subretinal fluid volume over a follow-up period of a few weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepehr Bahadorani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Kyle Maclean
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Kendall Wannamaker
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Edward Rickie Chu
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Nathan Gresores
- Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Roberto Diaz-Rohena
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wannamaker KW, Kenny S, Das R, Mendlovitz A, Comstock JM, Chu ER, Bahadorani S, Gresores NJ, Beck KD, Krambeer CJ, Kermany DS, Diaz-Rohena R, Nolan DP, Sohn JH, Singer MA. The effects of temporary intraocular pressure spikes after intravitreal dexamethasone implantation on the retinal nerve fiber layer. Clin Ophthalmol 2019; 13:1079-1086. [PMID: 31417237 PMCID: PMC6602526 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s201395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objective: The dexamethasone (DEX) implant is known to cause temporary intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes after implantation. The purpose of this study is to determine if IOP spikes after DEX implant cause significant thinning in the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). Study design, patients, and methods: A total of 306 charts were reviewed with 48 and 21 patients meeting inclusion criteria for the cross-sectional and prospective groups, respectively. Cross-sectional inclusion criteria: IOP spike ≥22 mmHg up to 16 weeks after DEX implant, DEX implant in only 1 eye per patient, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) RNFL imaging of both eyes ≥3 months after IOP spike. Prospective inclusion criteria: OCT RNFL performed within 1 year prior to DEX implantation, IOP spike ≥22 mmHg up to 16 weeks after DEX implant, and OCT RNFL performed ≥3 months after IOP spike. The average RNFL thickness in the contralateral eye was used as the control in the cross-sectional group. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Results: In the cross-sectional group, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean RNFL thicknesses in the treated vs untreated eyes (80.4±15.5 μm and 82.6±15.8 μm, respectively; P=0.33) regardless of treatment diagnosis, magnitude of IOP spike, or history of glaucoma. In the prospective group, mean RNFL thicknesses before and after IOP spikes ≥22 mmHg were similar (78.0±14.8 μm and 75.6±13.6 μm, respectively; P=0.13). Conclusion and relevance: Temporary elevation of IOP after DEX implantation when treated with topical IOP lowering drops does not appear to lead to a meaningful change in RNFL thickness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendall W Wannamaker
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Sarah Kenny
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Rishi Das
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Jordan M Comstock
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Edward R Chu
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Sepehr Bahadorani
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Kinley D Beck
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Roberto Diaz-Rohena
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Daniel P Nolan
- Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates , San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sim SH, Park IH, Jung KH, Kim SB, Ahn JH, Lee KH, Im SA, Im YH, Park YH, Sohn JH, Kim YJ, Lee S, Kim HJ, Chae YS, Park KH, Nam BH, Lee KS, Ro J. Abstract P6-17-23: Randomized phase II study of lapatinib plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer progressed after lapatinib and trastuzumab treatment. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-17-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The continuum of anti-HER2 agents is regarded as a standard strategy for HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients who had progressed disease with anti-HER2 agent- containing treatments. However, there has been lack of data on which agents should be continued and how long continuous anti-HER2 therapies would be effective. This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lapatinib plus vinorelbine in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients who had progressed on both trastuzumab and lapatinib treatments.
Methods
A total of 149 patients were randomly assigned to lapatinib with vinorelbine (LV) (n=75; laptinib, 1000mg daily ; vinorelbine 20mg/m2 D1,D8 q3w) or vinorelbine alone (V) (n=74; 30mg/m2 D1,D8 q3w). The stratification factors were followings; 1) visceral metastasis, 2) previous response to lapatinib treatment, CR+PR vs. SD ≥ 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) rate at 18 weeks. The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and overall survival (OS).
Results :
Both arms were well balanced in various clinical factors. The median number of previous anti-HER2 therapies were 2 (range 2-5). There was no significant difference in PFS rate at 18 weeks between LV and V arms (44.0% vs 36.5%, p=0.44). ORR was 19.7% in LV arm and 16.9% in V arm (p=0.881). PFS and OS did not differ between two arms (LV vs V; median PFS, 16weeks vs 12 weeks, HR= 0.86, 95% CI 0.61-1.22, p=0.41; median OS, 15.0 months vs 18.9 months, HR= 1.07, 95% CI 0.72-1.58, p=0.72). In subgroup analysis, there was no difference in PFS and OS between two arms according to previous response to lapatinib (median PFS, CR+PR vs. SD ≥ 12 weeks, 12.1weeks vs.17.4 weeks; HR= 1.242, 95% CI 0.881-1.751, p=0.215; median OS, 14.9 months vs. 19.4 months; HR= 1.179, 95% CI 0.797-1.744, p=0.41). Most common adverse events in both arms were neutropenia which was more often observed in V arm (55% vs 73%, p=0.03). Overall, the profiles of adverse events were similar in both arms and all were manageable.
Conclusion
Lapatinib plus vinorelbine treatment was tolerable, however, it did not demonstrate the clinical benefits compared to vinorelbine alone in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients after progression on both trastuzumab and lapatinib.
Citation Format: Sim SH, Park IH, Jung KH, Kim S-B, Ahn J-H, Lee K-H, Im S-A, Im Y-H, Park YH, Sohn JH, Kim YJ, Lee S, Kim H-J, Chae YS, Park K-H, Nam B-H, Lee KS, Ro J. Randomized phase II study of lapatinib plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer progressed after lapatinib and trastuzumab treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-23.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SH Sim
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - IH Park
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - KH Jung
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - S-B Kim
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - J-H Ahn
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - K-H Lee
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - S-A Im
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Y-H Im
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - YH Park
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - JH Sohn
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - YJ Kim
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - S Lee
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - H-J Kim
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - YS Chae
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - K-H Park
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - B-H Nam
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - KS Lee
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - J Ro
- National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Republic of Korea; Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bahadorani S, Krambeer C, Wannamaker K, Tie W, Jansen M, Espitia J, Sohn JH, Singer MA. The effects of repeated Ozurdex injections on ocular hypertension. Clin Ophthalmol 2018; 12:639-642. [PMID: 29662300 PMCID: PMC5892964 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s148990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to correlate the degree of ocular hypertension with the number of Ozurdex injections. Methods Intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations for a total of 183 injections were studied over a period of at least 12 months. The main indications for treatment were uveitis, diabetic macular edema, and retinal vein occlusion. Results Results of the study demonstrate that repeated Ozurdex injections do not increase the frequency of IOP spikes beyond 30 mmHg. For lower IOPs, however, a positive correlation exists. Furthermore, patients with primary open angle glaucoma and uveitis had the highest IOP response to repeated injections. On average, patients with an IOP of ≥28.6 mmHg received pressure lowering medications, after which their IOP reached a stable level (16.7 mmHg) without the need for additional interventions. Conclusion The data support the conclusion that multiple Ozurdex injections does not increase the frequency of IOP spikes beyond 30 mmHg, but patients still must be closely monitored if they have a history of primary open angle glaucoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepehr Bahadorani
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Kendall Wannamaker
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Wayne Tie
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Michael Jansen
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jason Espitia
- Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim JY, Lee E, Park K, Jung HH, Park WY, Lee KH, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Jung KH, Kim JH, Lee KH, Im SA, Park YH. Abstract P2-09-21: Molecular alterations and poziotinib, a pan-HER inhibitor efficacy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2) positive breast cancers: Combined exploratory biomarker analysis from phase II clinical trial of poziotinib for refractory HER2 positive breast cancer(BC) patients. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p2-09-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Poziotinib is a novel, pan-HER kinase inhibitor which showed potent anti-tumor activities through irreversible inhibition of HER family tyrosine kinases in preclinical and early clinical studies. Recent the open-label, multicenter phase II trial of poziotinib monotherapy evaluated that poziotinib is a new promising option for patients with HER2-positive metastatic BC who have failed more than two HER2 targeted therapy (NCT02418689). We evaluated genetic profiles of HER2-positive metastatic BC and investigated potential biomarkers of poziotinib for HER2-positive metastatic BC (MBC). Methods: All participants were diagnosed as HER2-positive BCs according to American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 guideline and provided tissue specimens that would be possible to extract DNA and RNA for next generation sequencing. We performed targeted deep sequencing with a customized 381 cancer gene panel (CancerSCAN™) and analyzed the relationship among the sequencing data, immunohistochemistry and clinical outcome.
Results: From Apr 2015 to Feb 2016, 106 patients were enrolled in the trial from 7 institutes in Korea. Of 106 patients, biomarker data were available for 79 patients. TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene (70.8%) followed by PIK3CA (45.6%). HER2 single nucleotide variant (SNV) was detected in 13 BCs (16.5%) and HER3 SNV was in 9 (11.4%). The score of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was 3+ in 68 BCs and 2+ with positive in situ hybridization in 11 BCs. In copy number variant (CNV) analysis, HER2 amplification (86.1%) was most frequently observed and followed by CDK12 amplification (58.2%) and APOBEC3B deletion (30.4%). IHC score of HER2 was positively correlated to copy number (CN) of HER2 (P=0.001) but 11 breast cancer tissue did not have copy number amplification of HER2 (13.9%) (Six of HER2 IHC score 2+ and 5 of 3+). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.04 months (95% CI, 2.96 - 4.40) for patients who treated with poziotinib in this study. PIK3CA activating mutations were associated with short PFS compared to wild type (WT) and other SNVs (Median PFS of activating mutations vs. WT and others: 2.66 vs. 4.40 (months), P=0.009). HER2 CN amplification was positively correlated to duration of PFS (Median PFS of no amplification vs. 4 ≤ CN < 16 vs. 16 ≤ CN: 2.56 vs. 3.02 vs. 4.86 (months), P=0.032). HER2 SNVs prolonged duration of PFS without statistical significance (Median PFS of HER2 SNVs vs. WT: 4.24 vs. 3.19 (months), P=0.114), but 10 of 13 BCs with HER2 SNV (76.9%) had clinical benefit from poziotinib and 5 BCs (38.5%) had durable response more than 6 months. Conclusion: In this biomarker analysis, SNV of HER2 was frequently observed in HER2 positive MBCs and HER2 CN amplification was detected not in all. High CN amplification of HER2 derived longer PFS than those with low CN. To contrary to this, activating PIK3CA mutations shorten PFS compared to those with WT. In addition, HER2 SNVs might be a potential biomarker of poziotinib in HER2-positive MBC. Further functional study would be warranted.
Citation Format: Kim J-Y, Lee E, Park K, Jung HH, Park W-Y, Lee K-H, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Jung KH, Kim J-H, Lee KH, Im S-A, Park YH. Molecular alterations and poziotinib, a pan-HER inhibitor efficacy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2) positive breast cancers: Combined exploratory biomarker analysis from phase II clinical trial of poziotinib for refractory HER2 positive breast cancer(BC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-Y Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - E Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - K Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - HH Jung
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - W-Y Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - K-H Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - JH Sohn
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - KS Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - KH Jung
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - J-H Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - KH Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - S-A Im
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| | - YH Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Im SA, Xu B, Li W, Robson M, Ouyang Q, Yeh DC, Iwata H, Park YH, Sohn JH, Tseng LM, Goessl C, Wu W, Runswick S, Masuda N. Abstract P5-21-13: Olaparib monotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation: Asian subgroup analysis from the phase III OlympiAD trial. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p5-21-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In the Phase III OlympiAD trial (NCT02000622, D0819C00003), olaparib (Lynparza™) showed a significant progression-free survival (PFS) improvement compared with chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm) (Robson et al. NEJM 2017). Here, we present data from a subgroup analysis of Asian pts. It is not yet known whether Asian pts, in comparison with the global patient population, may experience instances of differential toxicity with olaparib therapy.
Methods
OlympiAD, an open-label, multicenter, Phase III trial, randomized (2:1) pts with HER2-negative mBC and a gBRCAm to olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or single-agent TPC (21-day cycles of capecitabine, eribulin or vinorelbine). Pts must have received ≤2 lines of chemotherapy for mBC and prior anthracycline and taxane in the adjuvant, neo-adjuvant or metastatic setting. Primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). Region (Asia, Europe, North America, South America) was a pre-defined subgroup for PFS.
Results
The Asian subgroup analysis included pts randomized at centers in China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Of 87 Asian pts randomized (median age 46 years), 86 received study treatment (n=59, olaparib; n=27, TPC). In the olaparib group, 29/59 (49%) had estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and/or progesterone receptor positive (PR+) tumors, and 30/59 (51%) had triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the TPC group, 13/28 (46%) had ER+/PR+ tumors and 15/28 (54%) had TNBC. The primary endpoint, PFS by BICR, favored olaparib with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29–0.97; median 5.7 vs 4.2 months; 77% maturity), and was supported by investigator-assessed PFS (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16–0.55). In the overall OlympiAD study population (N=302), the PFS by BICR favored olaparib with a HR of 0.58 (95% CI 0.43–0.80; P=0.0009). Within the Asian subgroup, objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST) was 64% for olaparib versus 38% for the TPC group. Time to second progression, PFS2, was longer for pts receiving olaparib versus TPC (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22–0.84; 57% maturity). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 46% and 59% of pts receiving olaparib and TPC, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AE was anemia (olaparib, 20%; TPC, 15%). In both treatment groups, 7% of pts discontinued study treatment due to AEs (n=4, olaparib; n=2, TPC). The tolerability profile of olaparib between the subgroup of Asian pts and the overall OlympiAD population will be examined in our data presentation.
Conclusion
Olaparib demonstrated an efficacy benefit compared with TPC in pts with HER2-negative mBC and a gBRCAm in this subgroup analysis of Asian pts from the Phase III OlympiAD trial. Discontinuation rates due to toxicity were low, highlighting that olaparib was generally well-tolerated. The efficacy of olaparib within the subgroup of Asian pts was consistent with that shown for the full OlympiAD dataset; consistent hazard ratios were shown in favor of olaparib using the primary endpoint of PFS by BICR, and for the key secondary endpoints of PFS by investigator assessment, PFS2, and ORR.
Citation Format: Im S-A, Xu B, Li W, Robson M, Ouyang Q, Yeh D-C, Iwata H, Park Y-H, Sohn JH, Tseng L-M, Goessl C, Wu W, Runswick S, Masuda N. Olaparib monotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation: Asian subgroup analysis from the phase III OlympiAD trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S-A Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - B Xu
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - W Li
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - M Robson
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Q Ouyang
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - D-C Yeh
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - H Iwata
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Y-H Park
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - JH Sohn
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - L-M Tseng
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - C Goessl
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - W Wu
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - S Runswick
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - N Masuda
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Medical Oncology Center, Hunan Tumor Hospital, Changsha, China; Taichung Tzu-Chi Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan; Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Astrazeneca, Gaithersburg; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pyo JS, Sohn JH, Kang G. Diagnostic assessment of intraoperative cytology for papillary thyroid carcinoma: using a decision tree analysis. J Endocrinol Invest 2017; 40:305-311. [PMID: 27761885 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-016-0563-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to elucidate the cytological characteristics and the diagnostic usefulness of intraoperative cytology (IOC) for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). In addition, using decision tree analysis, effective features for accurate cytological diagnosis were sought. METHODS We investigated cellularity, cytological features and diagnosis based on the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in IOC of 240 conventional PTCs. The cytological features were evaluated in terms of nuclear score with nuclear features, and additional figures such as presence of swirling sheets, psammoma bodies, and multinucleated giant cells. The nuclear score (range 0-7) was made via seven nuclear features, including (1) enlarged, (2) oval or irregularly shaped nuclei, (3) longitudinal nuclear grooves, (4) intranuclear cytoplasmic pseudoinclusion, (5) pale nuclei with powdery chromatin, (6) nuclear membrane thickening, and (7) marginally placed micronucleoli. RESULTS Nuclear scores in PTC, suspicious for malignancy, and atypia of undetermined significance cases were 6.18 ± 0.80, 4.48 ± 0.82, and 3.15 ± 0.67, respectively. Additional figures more frequent in PTC than in other diagnostic categories were identified. Cellularity of IOC significantly correlated with tumor size, nuclear score, and presence of additional figures. Also, IOCs with higher nuclear scores (4-7) significantly correlated with larger tumor size and presence of additional figures. In decision tree analysis, IOCs with nuclear score >5 and swirling sheets could be considered diagnostic for PTCs. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that IOCs using nuclear features and additional figures could be useful with decreasing the likelihood of inconclusive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-S Pyo
- Department of Pathology, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - J H Sohn
- Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29 Saemunanro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03181, Republic of Korea.
| | - G Kang
- Department of Pathology, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Park YH, Im SA, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Chae YS, Lee KH, Kim JH, Im YH, Ahn JS, Kim TY, Lee KH, Kim SB, Ahn JH, Kim GM, Park IH, Lee SJ, Han HS, Kim SH, Jung KH. Abstract OT1-01-12: A phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine (EG) vs. paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG) in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer as first-line chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-ot1-01-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and is needed to improve effective chemotherapy. Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine (PG) combination chemotherapy is one of the preferred chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with MBC, and was found to be proper as a maintenance chemotherapy regimen with survival benefit and feasible toxicity profile. Eribulin mesylate is a non-taxane inhibitor of microtubule dynamics of the halichondrin class of antineoplastic drugs. A recent pooled analysis of two phase II studies with eribulin showed improved overall survival in in various patient subgroups with advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had previously received an anthracycline and a taxane. Furthermore, eribulin may have rational benefit compared with paclitaxel in terms of neurotoxicity. Therefore, Eribulin plus Gemcitabine (EG) combination chemotherapy may have less neurotoxocity comparing to PG.
Trial Design: Prospective randomized phase 2, open-label, two-arm, multi-center study comparing EG chemotherapy with PG chemotherapy for patients with HER-2 negative MBC as first-line chemotherapy.
Eligibility Criteria: Histologically confirmed breast cancer patients, at least 19 years of age, with no prior history of chemotherapy for metastatic, recurrent breast cancer with evaluable lesions (as per RECIST, 1.1) who have adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. Patients either may or may not have a prior anthracycline containing regimen. Prior hormonal therapy as a treatment of metastatic disease is allowed.
Specific Aims:
The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial is Progression-Free Survival (PFS). The secondary efficacy endpoints are: Time to Treatment Failure (TTF); Overall Survival (OS); neuropathic scale (FACT for Taxane QOL assessment); toxicity; duration of response; Objective Response Rate (ORR); Clinical Benefit Rate. The exploratory endpoint of the study includes pharmacogenetic profile.
Statistical Methods:
The initial sample size of the present study was determined based on the data derived from a previous trial on PG maintenance chemotherapy design; 6-month PFS is 70% for PG chemotherapy. This design was hypothesized that EG chemotherapy would not be inferior to PG chemotherapy. Thus, estimated PFS for each arm is 70%. Based on this estimate, we would plan to recruit a total of 100 patients (50 per arm). Considering drop-out rate of 10%, total 112 MBC patients planned to be enrolled.
Present Accrual and Target Accrual:Enrollment has been completed as of March, 2016 with a target enrollment of 112 patients.
Contact information:Kyung Hae Jung MD, Ph.D. khjung@amc.seoul.kr
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02263495.
Citation Format: Park YH, Im S-A, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Chae YS, Lee KH, Kim J-H, Im Y-H, Ahn JS, Kim T-Y, Lee K-H, Kim S-B, Ahn J-H, Kim GM, Park IH, Lee SJ, Han HS, Kim SH, Jung KH. A phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine (EG) vs. paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG) in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer as first-line chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YH Park
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - S-A Im
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - JH Sohn
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - KS Lee
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - YS Chae
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - KH Lee
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - J-H Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - Y-H Im
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - JS Ahn
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - T-Y Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - K-H Lee
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - S-B Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - J-H Ahn
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - GM Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - IH Park
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - SJ Lee
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - HS Han
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - SH Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - KH Jung
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brufsky A, Kim SB, Velu T, García-Saenz JA, Tan-Chiu E, Sohn JH, Dirix L, Borms MV, Liu MC, Moezi MM, Kozloff MF, Sparano JA, Xu N, Wongchenko M, Simmons B, McNally V, Miles D. Abstract P4-22-22: Cobimetinib (C) combined with paclitaxel (P) as a first-line treatment in patients (pts) with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (COLET study): Updated clinical and biomarker results. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p4-22-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Resistance to standard taxane-based chemotherapy is common in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Mutations and gene amplifications in the MAPK pathway that upregulate MAPK signaling are present in many TNBC tumors. Upregulation of the MAPK signaling pathway can result in degradation of the pro-apoptotic protein BIM and upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins, including BCL-2, BCL-XL, and MCL-1, thus promoting cell survival and desensitizing tumor cells to the pro-apoptotic effects of taxane chemotherapy. Updated data on clinical safety and efficacy are presented along with biomarker data evaluating the effects of treatment on induction of apoptosis.The COLET study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02322814; EudraCT number, 2014-002230-32) consisted of a safety run-in (n∼12) followed by a blinded 1:1 randomized expansion stage (n∼90) to C + P or placebo (PBO) + P. The safety stage is complete and the randomized stage is enrolling pts. Two additional cohorts investigating the effect of adding atezolizumab will be recruiting and are out of scope of this submission. Pts in cohort I were treated with P 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and C/PBO 60 mg/day on days 3–23 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Gene expression and apoptotic index were measured by RNA-Seq and TUNEL staining, respectively, to assess the biologic activity of C + P.Sixteen women (median age, 55.5 years) were enrolled in the safety run-in stage. At data snapshot (April 22, 2016), all 16 pts had received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Median time on treatment was 116 days (range, 7-336) for C and 84 days (range, 0-351) for P. Fifteen (94%) pts had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 5 (31%) pts had grade 1/2 AEs and 10 (63%) pts had grade 3 AEs (Table). No pts experienced grade 4–5 AEs. Among the 16 safety run-in patients, responses to date include partial response (PR; n = 8 [50.0%]), stable disease (SD, n = 4 [25.0%]), and progressive disease (n = 2 [12.5%]), as well as 2 pts with no post-baseline tumor assessment. Six pts maintained a PR at ∼20 weeks and three maintained a PR at ≥40 weeks. To date, matched pre- and on-treatment biopsies were evaluable for 2 pts, 1 with a PR and 1 with SD. In the patient who attained a PR, increased expression of pro-apoptosis genes, including BIM, was observed; but this was not seen in the patient experiencing SD. The PR patient also had an increase in apoptotic index. Updated biomarker data will be reported.This is the first study to evaluate C + P in TNBC. The safety profile of C + P is consistent with that of known safety profiles. Efficacy and safety will be further evaluated in the ongoing randomized stage.
Most common (any grade ≥20%) AEsTreatment-emergent AEs, n (%)C + P (safety run-in stage), N = 16 All gradesGrade 3Diarrhea10 (63)1 (6)Rash8 (50)0Nausea7 (44)0Alopecia5 (31)0Blood CPK level increase5 (31)1 (6)Stomatitis4 (25)2 (13)Asthenia4 (25)1 (6)Constipation4 (25)0Dyspnea4 (25)0Edema peripheral4 (25)0Pyrexia4 (25)0Vomiting4 (25)0AEs, adverse events; C, cobimetinib; CPK, creatinine phosphokinase; P, paclitaxel.
Citation Format: Brufsky A, Kim S-B, Velu T, García-Saenz JA, Tan-Chiu E, Sohn JH, Dirix L, Borms MV, Liu M-C, Moezi MM, Kozloff MF, Sparano JA, Xu N, Wongchenko M, Simmons B, McNally V, Miles D. Cobimetinib (C) combined with paclitaxel (P) as a first-line treatment in patients (pts) with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (COLET study): Updated clinical and biomarker results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Brufsky
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - S-B Kim
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - T Velu
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - JA García-Saenz
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - E Tan-Chiu
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - JH Sohn
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - L Dirix
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - MV Borms
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - M-C Liu
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - MM Moezi
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - MF Kozloff
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - JA Sparano
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - N Xu
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Wongchenko
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - B Simmons
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - V McNally
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - D Miles
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Chirec Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Florida Cancer Research Institute, Plantation, FL; Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea; Sint-Augustinuskliniek, Antwerp, Belgium; AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL; Ingalls Memorial Hospital, Harvey, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Roche Products Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim SH, Lee JM, Yun HG, Park US, Hwang SU, Pyo JS, Sohn JH. Overall accuracy of cervical cytology and clinicopathological significance of LSIL cells in ASC-H cytology. Cytopathology 2016; 28:16-23. [PMID: 27245707 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were (i) to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Papanicolaou (Pap) smears and (ii) to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of the presence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cells in atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (ASC-H) cytology. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed paired cytological and histological findings from 3141 patients. ASC-H cytology was classified as either ASC-H or LSIL with some features suggestive of the presence of a concurrent HSIL (LSIL-H). Clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated through a retrospective study and meta-analysis. RESULTS The accuracy of the cytological diagnosis was 93.7% (2942 of 3141 cases). The positive predictive value (PPV) of ASC-H for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN 2+ ) was 51.4%. In cases of LSIL-H, CIN 2+ histology was more prevalent in the pre-menopausal period (19-44 years) than in peri- and postmenopausal periods (older than 45 years) (P = 0.024). There was no difference in the ability of LSIL-H and ASC-H to predict CIN 2+. CONCLUSION The Pap smear is a good cervical cancer screening method. Although there was no difference in the predictive value for CIN 2+ between LSIL-H and ASC-H, the presence of definite LSIL cells was more predictive of CIN 2+ in younger patients than in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S H Kim
- Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - J M Lee
- Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - H G Yun
- Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - U S Park
- Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - S U Hwang
- Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - J-S Pyo
- Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - J H Sohn
- Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kim TY, Ahn JH, Yoon JH, Sohn JH, Kim GM, Lee KH, Park YH, Koh SJ, Lee SE, Chae Y, Lee KS, Lee KE, Won HS, Kim JH, Jeong J, Park KH, Cho EK, Im YH, Im SA, Jung KH. Abstract P1-09-09: Role of endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, compared with postmenopausal patients: Diachronic analyses from nationwide cohort in Korea (KCSG BR 14-07). Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p1-09-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Endocrine therapy (E) has a major role in treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, in contrast to western countries, premenopausal patients (PRE) more prevalent (50% of all breast cancer patients) and have less options of E than postmenopausal patients (POST) in Korea where the use of LHRH agonist in combination aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in PRE is restricted. Recently we have been successfully established nationwide cohort for the patients MBC (575 patients from 26 institutes). This study was designed to evaluate the role of E especially in PRE.
Methods
The patients with MBC were prospectively or retrospectively enrolled between September 2014 and May 2015. Only menopausal status-confirmed patients (296) were analyzed. Postmenopause was defined, based on NCCN guideline. Total duration of treatment was defined as the time from start day of any first treatment to end of any last treatment. Total duration of E was defined as the sum of time duration of each E. Overall survival was calculated from the start day of any treatment for MBC to any causes of death. This work is supported by National Strategic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (H110C2020).
Results
A total of 296 patients with HR-positive MBC were analyzed [PRE, 169 (57.1%) and POST, 127 (42.9%)]. Except age (mean 44 and 60 years), baseline characteristics including in pathology, HER2 status, initial pathologic stage, de novo metastasis versus recurrence, surgery and adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and radiotherapy) were well balanced. 92 (54.4%) of PRE and 77 (60.6%) of POST received at least one or more E through all treatment course. 41 (24.2%) of PRE and 44 (34.6%) received E as 1st-line treatment (p=0.034). Among PRE who received 1st-line of E, 30 (71.4%) and 9 (21.4%) of PRE received 2nd- and 3rd-line E. 20 (45.4%) and 10 (22.7%) of POST received 2nd- and 3rd- or more line of E. Most of PRE (54%) received tamoxifen+/-goserelin and 32% of PRE received AIs along with ovarian suppression. 71% of POST received AIs. As initial treatment, E was more frequently used in POST than in PRE (34.6% and 24.3%, p=0.053). Overall survival (OS) of all patients was 18.2 months (95% CI, 14.8-21.5). There was no difference in OS between PRE (17.8 months, 10.9-24.8) and POST (18.5 months, 95% CI, 13.2-23.9) (P=0.337). No difference of OS was observed (E, 18.1 moths, 95% CI, 13.0-23.3; chemotherapy 21.2 moths, 95% CI, 16.8-25.5), regardless of initial treatment. Total duration of treatment of PRE and POST were 15.2 and 13.6 months, respectively with no significant difference (p=0.389). PRE (8.3 moths, 95% CI,5.7-10.8) showed the trend toward longer duration of E in comparison with POST (5.5 moths, 95% CI,4.4-6.7), however the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.051).
Conclusion
E was more commonly used as 1st-line therapy in POST than in PRE. Although PRE had limited options of E, E was used in long duration of treatment especially in PRE. These findings suggested that E had a role in treatment for PRE with HR-positive MBC and could be used in treatment for PRE with good efficacy.
Citation Format: Kim T-Y, Ahn J-H, Yoon JH, Sohn JH, Kim GM, Lee KH, Park YH, Koh S-J, Lee SE, Chae Y, Lee KS, Lee KE, Won HS, Kim JH, Jeong J, Park KH, Cho EK, Im Y-H, Im S-A, Jung KH. Role of endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, compared with postmenopausal patients: Diachronic analyses from nationwide cohort in Korea (KCSG BR 14-07). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T-Y Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J-H Ahn
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - JH Yoon
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - JH Sohn
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - GM Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - KH Lee
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - YH Park
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - S-J Koh
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - SE Lee
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Y Chae
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - KS Lee
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - KE Lee
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - HS Won
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - JH Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - J Jeong
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - KH Park
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - EK Cho
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Y-H Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - S-A Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - KH Jung
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Patients with breast cancer who received chemotherapy have distressing side effects such as mucositis, alopecia, gastritis, and BM suppression. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia(CIA) is one of considerable psychological events in self-esteem in patients with breast cancer, but the possibility of irreversible alopecia is often overlooked by physician.
We investigated clinical characteristics of CIA and prevalence of irreversible severe hair loss in patient with breast cancer who received chemotherapy.
Methods
We conducted a survey to collect demographic information about CIA with 150 breast cancer patients who had passed at least 6 months since their last day of chemotherapy from February 2015 to May 2015 in Yonsei Cancer Center. We obtained clinical information as age, elapsed time from end of chemotherapy, chemotherapy regimen, and other adjuvant therapy using their electrical medical records. We compared irreversible CIA characters between anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) and taxane based regimen groups. The severe alopecia was defined as the hair density loss over 50% compared to the hair density before chemotherapy.
Results
The mean age at chemotherapy was 48 years old (±17.3) and the mean elapsed time after chemotherapy was 37 months (±9.5) in total patients.
Remnant alopecia was reported in 71 patients (47.3%). Wig or hat were used in 39 patients (26.0%).
The mean satisfaction score with a five-point scale was 4 in patients without alopecia or hair character change and 2.2 in patients with irreversible alopecia (p<0.001). The severe irreversible hair loss was complained by the 12 (8.2%) patients.
AC and taxane based chemotherapy were carried out in 65 and 85 patients, respectively. In AC group, remnant alopecia was shown in 18 patients (27.7%), and more than a half of patients in taxane group, 53 patients (62.4%), showed remnant alopecia (p<0.001). While only five patients (7.8%) in AC group suffered for severe hair loss, 26 patients (31.3%) in taxane group were affected by severe hair loss (p=0.001). The mean satisfaction level of hair status in patients in taxane group was 2.5 as compared to 3.6 in those in AC group (p<0.001).
Conclusion
Contrary to general expectation, About a half of breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy complained of irreversible hair loss even though at least 6 months has elapsed since the end of chemotherpy. In particular, patients with taxane based chemotherapy had more irreversible and severe alopecia than those with AC chemotherapy.
Citation Format: Kim S, Park HS, Kim JY, Nam S, Kim GM, Sohn JH, Kim SI. Irriversible chemotherapy-induced alopecia in breast cancer patient. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kim
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - HS Park
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - JY Kim
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - S Nam
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - GM Kim
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - JH Sohn
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - SI Kim
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim TY, Sohn JH, Kim SB, Yoon JH, Kim GM, Lee KH, Koh SJ, Park YH, Lee SE, Chae Y, Lee KS, Lee KE, Won HS, Kim JH, Jeong J, Park KH, Cho EK, Im YH, Im SA, Jung KH. Abstract P6-10-03: Does participation in clinical trials influence on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer? Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p6-10-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Recently, many clinical trials (TRIAL) especially incorporated with molecular-targeted agents are being conducted in treatment for breast cancer worldwide. However, the relation of participating clinical trials with survival has not been actively studied. This study was designed to evaluate whether participation in clinical trials could improve overall survival (OS) or not in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), compared with conventional treatment.
Method
Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) has successfully established Nationwide Cohort in KOREA to conduct diachronic analysis (KCSG BR 14-07). Clinical data for patients with MBC were collected from this Cohort. OS was defined as the time duration from first diagnosis of metastasis to any cause of death. This work is supported by National Strategic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research (H110C2020).
Results
A total of 575 patients with metastatic breast from 26 institutes in KOREA cancer MBC were consequently enrolled between September 2014 and May 2015. 156 (27.1%) of patients were enrolled to at least one or more clinical trials and 419 patients received only conventional treatment (CONV). Age, hormone status, HER2 status, initial pathologic stage, metastasis versus recurrence, adjuvant treatment, ECOG performance status (PS) (0, 1 vs 2 or more) were similar between TRIAL and CONV. 30% of trials were associated with HER2-targeted agents. As initial treatment, chemotherapy was more frequently used in TRIAL (85.9%) than in CONV (79.0%) (P=0.038). Number of regimens of chemotherapy was greater in TRIAL (2.9+/-1.8) than CONV (2.1+/-1.6) (P<0.001). Number of regimens of endocrine therapy (E) was similar between TRIAL (1.4+/-0.6) and CONV (1.5+/-0.7) (P=0.474). Overall survival of all patients was 16.2 months (95% CI, 14.1-18.1). TRIAL showed significant prolongation of survival, compared with CONV [21.1 (95% CI, 17.7-24.6) vs 15.1 months (95% CI, 13.1-17.2); P=0.005]. The differences in OS was constantly observed in HER2-positive [23.8 (16.7-30.9) vs 17.2 months (95% CI, 12.4-21.9); P=0.018] and Triple-negative [15.4 (10.5-20.3) vs 12.0 months (95% CI, 10.2-13.8); P=0.025]. In multivariate analysis, initial metastasis, hormone status, ECOG PS did not influence on OS between TRIAL and CONV (P=0.849)
Conclusion
Participating in clinical trials could be associated with prolongation of survival. This results constantly maintained in HER2-positive and triple-negative MBC. These findings suggested that clinical trials are useful for the patients with MBC, even if the patients do not complete the standard treatment.
Citation Format: Kim T-Y, Sohn JH, Kim S-B, Yoon JH, Kim GM, Lee KH, Koh S-J, Park YH, Lee SE, Chae Y, Lee KS, Lee KE, Won HS, Kim JH, Jeong J, Park KH, Cho EK, Im Y-H, Im S-A, Jung KH. Does participation in clinical trials influence on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer?. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T-Y Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - JH Sohn
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - S-B Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - JH Yoon
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - GM Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - KH Lee
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - S-J Koh
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - YH Park
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - SE Lee
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Y Chae
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - KS Lee
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - KE Lee
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - HS Won
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - JH Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - J Jeong
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - KH Park
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - EK Cho
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Y-H Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - S-A Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - KH Jung
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Division of Breast-Endocrine Surgery, Chonnam National Univ. Hwasun Hospital, Kwangju, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea; Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea; Dong-A University Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea; Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Republic of Korea; Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Park YH, Jung KH, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Lee KH, Kim JH, Kim JY, Jung J, Han H, Park WY, Im SA. Abstract OT3-01-10: A prospective, open-label, single-arm, multi-center, phase II exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of poziotinib (NOV120101) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have received at least two prior HER2-directed regimens. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-ot3-01-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Poziotinib is a novel, oral, irreversible pan-HER inhibitor that has shown promising clinical activity in Phase 1 studies of patients (pts) with advance HER2 positive breast cancer who have failed at least 2 prior lines of HER2-directed therapy. A Phase 2 study of poziotinib was initiated in Korea in March 2015 in pts with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. This phase 2 study is designed to seek accelerated approval for poziotinib for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in Korea.
Trial Design: Prospective Phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multi-center study in pts with recurrent, Stage IV breast cancer with HER2-overexpression who had received at least 2 prior HER2-directed regimens
Eligibility Criteria: Histologically confirmed breast cancer patients, at least 19 years of age, with confirmed HER2 positive evaluable tumors (per RECIST, 1.1) who have adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function and have failed at least two HER2-directed regimens that included a taxane-containing anticancer chemotherapy, with a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
Specific Aims: The Primary Efficacy Endpoint of the study was Progression-Free Survival (PFS). The Secondary Efficacy Endpoints included: PFS rate at 12 weeks post-dose; Objective Response Rate (ORR) including Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) rates; Disease Control Rate (DCR) including CR, PR, and Stable Disease (SD); Duration of Disease Control; Overall Survival (OS); Time to Progression (TTP); Time to Objective Response and Duration of Objective Response. The Exploratory Endpoints included: Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile and Exploratory Genomic and Biomarker Analyses.
Statistical Methods: In the randomized, multicenter, 2-arm, open-label study of trastuzumab emtansine (TH3RESA18), the median PFS was shown to be 3.3 months in subjects with optimal treatment per Investigator's Choice. This ongoing study with poziotinib expects a median PFS of 4.5 months based on data from a previous Phase 1 study of poziotinib (NOV120101). Based on the following assumptions, a 5% one-sided significance level, and 80% power, and 2 months of accrual and 12 months of follow-up, 66 subjects will be required. Accounting for a 10% drop-out rate, a total of 74 subjects will be recruited into this ongoing Phase 2 study.
Present Accrual and Target Accrual: 17 patients enrolled as of May 20, 2015 with a total target enrollment of 74 patients
Contact information:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02418689.
Citation Format: Park Y-H, Jung KH, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Lee KH, Kim J-H, Kim J-Y, Jung J, Han H, Park W-Y, Im S-A. A prospective, open-label, single-arm, multi-center, phase II exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of poziotinib (NOV120101) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have received at least two prior HER2-directed regimens. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y-H Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - KH Jung
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - JH Sohn
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - KS Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - KH Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - J-H Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - J-Y Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - J Jung
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - H Han
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - W-Y Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - S-A Im
- Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea; National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam, Korea; National OncoVenture, Goyang, Korea; Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sohn JH, Rha SY, Jeung HC, Shin HJ, Goo YS, Chung HC, Yang WI, Hahn SB, Shin KH, Min JS, Kim BS, Roh JK, Jang WI. Efficacy of Pre- and Postoperative Chemotherapy in Patients with Osteosarcoma of the Extremities. Cancer Res Treat 2015; 33:520-6. [PMID: 26680832 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2001.33.6.520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the treatment efficacy including survival and recurrence, and factors associated with recurrence in osteosarcoma patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty nine patients with osteosarcoma were treated with preoperative chemotherapy with intra-arterial cisplatin and adriamycin infusion for 3 cycles, followed by surgery. According to the pathologic response, if tumor was necrotized more than 90%, the same adjuvant chemotherapy was reintroduced for 3 cycles, and if the response was not enough, then the salvage regimen was introduced. Plain chest film and chest CT scan were taken monthly and every 3 months, respectively. When tumor recurred, the metastasectomy was performed whenever possible. RESULTS Forty three patients were evaluable with amedian follow up of 53 months. Five-year disease-free and overallsurvival rate was 47.0% and 66.9%, respectively. The recurrence was observed in 22 patients (51.2%) with median time of 12.5 months. Baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was the only significant factor for recurrence (p=0.03) and the patients with the possibility of metastasectomy recurrence showed higher post-relapse survival compared to other treatment modalities (26 momths vs 5~12 months). CONCLUSION These results indicates that pre- and postoperative chemotherapy with intra-arterial cisplatin and adriamycin infusion showed comparable treatment efficacy and acceptable toxicities.
Collapse
|
26
|
Sohn JH, Hong SD, Kim JH, Dhong HJ, Chung SK, Kim HY, Oh SY. Extraocular muscle injury during endoscopic sinus surgery: a series of 10 cases at a single center. Rhinology 2014; 52:238-45. [PMID: 25271529 DOI: 10.4193/rhino13.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extraocular muscle (EOM) injury is a rare but serious complication of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The aim of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics and course of EOM injury occurring during ESS. DESIGN Retrospective case series. METHODS Medical records and CT images of patients who suffered from EOM injury after ESS between 2006 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, endoscopic anatomy, type of surgery (primary or revision), predisposing risk factors, site and extent of injury on CT imaging, and associated complications were evaluated. In addition, data regarding ophthalmologic management and clinical outcomes were collected. RESULTS Ten patients with EOM injuries after ESS were included in this study. One patient was undergoing revision ESS. All patients sustained medial rectus muscle injury and one patient suffered concurrent ipsilateral inferior rectus muscle injury. A microdebrider was used in nine cases. Right-sided injury (90% of patients) was more prevalent than left-sided injury, and 70% of injured medial rectus muscles were completely transected. After subsequent strabismus surgery, 8/9 patients regained binocular single vision in primary gaze despite residual diplopia in some gaze positions. CONCLUSION Although proper ophthalmologic surgery after EOM injury may improve deviation in the primary gaze position, none of the patients regained normal EOM movement. Therefore, prevention of this complication through adequate surgical technique and precautions is important.
Collapse
|
27
|
Jang JY, Kim TY, Sohn JH, Lee TH, Jeong SW, Park EJ, Lee SH, Kim SG, Kim YS, Kim HS, Kim BS. Relative adrenal insufficiency in chronic liver disease: its prevalence and effects on long-term mortality. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 40:819-26. [PMID: 25078874 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2014] [Revised: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 07/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI) and chronic liver disease is unclear. AIM To determine the frequency with which RAI is observed in noncritically ill patients at various stages of chronic liver disease, and the correlation between RAI and disease severity and long-term mortality. METHODS In total, 71 non-critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis (n = 54) and chronic hepatitis (n = 17) were evaluated prospectively. A short stimulation test (SST) with 250 μg of corticotrophin was performed to detect RAI. RAI was defined as an increase in serum cortisol of <9 μg/dL in patients with a basal total cortisol of <35 μg/dL. RESULTS RAI was observed in only 13 (24.1%) of 54 patients with cirrhosis. Compared to those without RAI, cirrhotic patients with RAI had significantly higher Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (10.3 ± 1.7 vs. 7.1 ± 1.8, mean ± s.d., P < 0.001) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (14.5 ± 6.6 vs. 9.4 ± 3.7, P = 0.017). The cortisol response to corticotropin was negatively correlated with the severity of cirrhosis (P < 0.05). In addition, the mortality rate was higher in cirrhotic patients with RAI (69.2%) than in those without RAI (4.9%; P < 0.001) during the follow-up period of 20.1 ± 13.5 months (range, 5.8-51.1 months). The cumulative 1-year survival rates in cirrhotic patients with and without RAI were 69.2% and 95.0%, respectively (P = 0.05), while the corresponding cumulative 3-year survival rates were 0% and 95.0% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Relative adrenal insufficiency is more commonly observed in those with severe cirrhosis, and is clearly associated with more advanced liver disease and a shortened long-term survival. This suggests that relative adrenal insufficiency is an independent prognostic factor in non-critically ill patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Jang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Digestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ahn D, Sohn JH, Jeon JH, Jeong JY. Clinical impact of microscopic extrathyroidal extension in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma treated with hemithyroidectomy. J Endocrinol Invest 2014; 37:167-73. [PMID: 24497215 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-013-0025-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2013] [Accepted: 11/17/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathologically confirmed microscopic extrathyroidal extension (ETE) is often identified after hemithyroidectomy in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). Without the presence of microscopic ETE, these patients would be optimal candidates for hemithyroidectomy. AIM The present study aimed at evaluating the clinical impact of microscopic ETE on the recurrence of PTMC treated with hemithyroidectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and 5-year outcomes for 262 PTMC patients without ETE and 86 with microscopic ETE who were treated with hemithyroidectomy between January 2004 and December 2010. RESULTS The mean tumour size was larger (0.67 vs. 0.54 cm, p < 0.001) and the proportion of tumours measuring ≥0.5 cm was higher (84.9 vs. 66.8 %, p = 0.001) in patients with microscopic ETE as compared with patients without ETE. Occult multifocal disease was more frequent in patients with microscopic ETE than in those without ETE (14.0 vs. 6.5 %, p = 0.030). However, the recurrence rate was not different between the two groups during the mean 55.8-month follow-up period. In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no meaningful association between recurrence and microscopic ETE in patients with PTMC treated with hemithyroidectomy. CONCLUSIONS Although microscopic ETE was associated with large tumour size and multifocal disease, its clinical impact on disease recurrence was not significant in PTMC patients treated with hemithyroidectomy. Therefore, microscopic ETE identified after hemithyroidectomy would not be an absolute indication for completion thyroidectomy in patients with PTMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ahn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Park KH, Sohn JH, Lee S, Park JH, Kang SY, Kim HY, Park IH, Park YH, Im YH, Lee HJ, Hong DS, Park S, Shin SH, Kwon HC, Seo JH. A randomized, multi-center, open-label, phase II study of once-per-cycle DA-3031, a biosimilar pegylated G-CSF, compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving TAC chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Invest New Drugs 2013; 31:1300-6. [PMID: 23677653 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-013-9973-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2013] [Accepted: 05/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS A pegylated form of recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was developed for prophylactic use in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-per-cycle DA-3031 in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS A total of 61 patients receiving docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) chemotherapy were randomized in cycle 1 to receive daily injections of filgrastim (100 μg/m(2)) or a single subcutaneous injection of pegylated filgrastim DA-3031 at a dose of either 3.6 mg or 6 mg. RESULTS The mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was comparable among the treatment groups (2.48, 2.20, and 2.05 days for filgrastim, DA-3031 3.6 mg and 6 mg, respectively; P=0.275). No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of febrile neutropenia between the treatment groups (9.5 %, 15.0 %, and 5.0 % for filgrastim, DA-3031 3.6 mg and 6 mg, respectively; P=0.681) in cycle 1. The incidences of adverse events attributable to G-CSF were similar among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Fixed doses of 3.6 mg or 6 mg DA-3031 have an efficacy comparable to that of daily injections of filgrastim in ameliorating grade 4 neutropenia in patients receiving TAC chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H Park
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 97 Guro-dong Gil, Guro-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yap YS, Cornelio GH, Devi BCR, Khorprasert C, Kim SB, Kim TY, Lee SC, Park YH, Sohn JH, Sutandyo N, Wong DWY, Kobayashi M, Landis SH, Yeoh EM, Moon H, Ro J. Brain metastases in Asian HER2-positive breast cancer patients: anti-HER2 treatments and their impact on survival. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:1075-82. [PMID: 22918394 PMCID: PMC3461152 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2012] [Revised: 07/10/2012] [Accepted: 07/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Asia, large-scale studies on anti-HER2 treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases are limited. We studied the treatment patterns of these patients in Asia to evaluate the impact of anti-HER2 treatment on the time to occurrence of brain metastases (TTBM) and survival after brain metastasis (BM). METHODS A retrospective study of HER2-positive breast cancer patients diagnosed with BM between January 2006 and December 2008 in six Asian countries was conducted. Demographics, tumour characteristics, treatment details, and events dates were collected from medical records. RESULTS Data from 280 patients were analysed. Before BM, 63% received anti-HER2 treatment. These patients had significantly longer TTBM than those without anti-HER2 treatment (median 33 vs 19 months; P<0.002). After BM, 93% received radiotherapy, 57% received chemotherapy, and 41% received anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab and/or lapatinib). Use of both anti-HER2 agents, primarily sequentially, after BM demonstrated the longest survival after BM and was associated with a significant survival benefit over no anti-HER2 treatment (median 26 vs 6 months; hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI 0.19-0.72). CONCLUSION Anti-HER2 treatment before BM was associated with longer TTBM. Anti-HER2 treatment after BM was associated with a survival benefit, especially when both trastuzumab and lapatinib were utilised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y S Yap
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610, Singapore
| | - G H Cornelio
- Saint Peregrine Oncology Unit, San Juan de Dios Hospital, 2772 Roxas Boulevard, Pasay City 1300, Philippines
| | - B C R Devi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Oncology and Palliative Care, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching 93586, Malaysia
| | - C Khorprasert
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama 4 Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - S B Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea
| | - T Y Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea
| | - S C Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119228, Singapore
| | - Y H Park
- Samsung Medical Center, 50 Irwon-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea
| | - J H Sohn
- Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea
| | - N Sutandyo
- Dharmais Hospital National Cancer Center, Jl. Let. Jend. S. Parman Kav. 84-86, Slipi, Jakarta Barat 11420, Indonesia
| | - D W Y Wong
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - M Kobayashi
- GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive 17.2136K.2A, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - S H Landis
- European Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline, 1-3 Iron Bridge Road, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB11 1BT, UK
| | - E M Yeoh
- Oncology R&D, GlaxoSmithKline Pte Ltd, 150 Beach Road, Gateway West, Singapore 189720, Singapore
| | - H Moon
- GlaxoSmithKline (China) R&D Co. Ltd, 917 Halei Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - J Ro
- National Cancer Center, 111 Jeongbalsanro, Ilsan-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do 410-769, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hwang G, Jeong EA, Sohn JH, Park H, Bang JS, Jin SC, Kim BC, Oh CW, Kwon OK. The characteristics and risk factors of headache development after the coil embolization of an unruptured aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33:1676-8. [PMID: 22492572 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a3018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Development of a headache after aneurysm coil embolization is not uncommon but has received little attention. The authors prospectively analyze the characteristics and risk factors of a headache after coiling in patients treated for an unruptured cerebral aneurysm. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety patients treated for an unruptured cerebral aneurysm over a period of 1 year, and without a headache history within a month before coiling, were enrolled in this study. All coilings were successfully performed without neurologic complications. After coiling, headache development and intensities were recorded. RESULTS Fifty (55.6%) patients experienced a headache (VAS score, 4.5 ± 2.02) at 7.9 (range, 0-72) hours, on average, after coiling, and all headaches resolved within an average of 73.0 (range, 3-312) hours. Univariate analysis showed that the following were significantly associated with the development of a headache: age ≤ 50 years (OR 4.636, 95% CI, 1.414-15.198), hypertension (OR 0.232, 95% CI, 0.095-0.571), a packing attenuation of >25% (OR 3.619, 95% CI, 1.428-9.174), and a previous headache history (OR 2.769, 95% CI, 1.120-6.849). However, binary logistic regression showed that only a packing attenuation of >25% (P = .013, adjusted OR 3.774, 95% CI, 1.320-10.790) and no history of hypertension (P = .019, adjusted OR 3.515, 95% CI, 1.233-10.021) were independently associated with the development of a headache. CONCLUSIONS A headache frequently developed after the coiling of unruptured aneurysms. However, headaches were relatively benign and resolved within several days. The present study shows that no hypertension history and a packing attenuation of >25% are risk factors of headache development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Hwang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Affiliation(s)
- Y S Hyun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Gyomun-Dong, Guri City, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Moon YW, Park S, Sohn JH, Kang DR, Koo JS, Park HS, Chung HC, Park BW. Abstract P3-10-11: Clinical Significance of Progesterone Receptor and HER2 Status in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Operable Breast Cancer with Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Consistent Prognostic Impact of HER2 Status Over Time. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p3-10-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate prognostic factors in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, operable breast cancer, focusing on the progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 over time.
Patients and Methods: A total of 819 patients with ER-positive, operable breast cancer were enrolled. All received adjuvant tamoxifen. Prognostic value of the PR status and HER2 status was evaluated using Cox regression before and after 5 years post-surgery.
Results: PR and HER2 status were inversely correlated (P = .014). PR-negativity was a time-dependent poor prognostic factor for recurrence before 5 years post-surgery (P = .049), but not after 5 years post-surgery (P = .566).
However, HER2 overexpression and younger age (35 years or less) were consistent prognostic factors for recurrence over all time periods, whereas N stage and histologic grade, which are known prognostic factors, were no longer informative after 5 years post-surgery, except for N3 disease. Conclusion: In ER-positive, operable breast cancer, the prognostic impact of PR status along with N stage and histologic grade were strong for the first 5 years post-surgery, but disappeared thereafter. However, HER2 overexpression was a consistent poor prognostic factor, suggesting that an alternative adjuvant strategy, possibly involving incorporation of prolonged HER2-targeted therapy should be evaluated for HER2-overexpressing tumors.
Figure available in online version.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YW Moon
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - S Park
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - JH Sohn
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - DR Kang
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - JS Koo
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - HS Park
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - HC Chung
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - B-W Park
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To report resolution of bilateral macular edema secondary to radiation retinopathy after intravenous diuresis. METHODS Observational case report, consisting of clinical examination, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography. RESULTS A 38-year-old woman developed radiation retinopathy and severe macular edema secondary to whole brain radiation therapy for metastatic breast cancer. After diuresis with intravenous furosemide for pleural effusion, the bilateral macular edema resolved. CONCLUSION In select patients, systemic diuresis may aid in resolving macular edema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Sarah Ko
- From the Retina Division, the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cramp AP, Sohn JH, James PJ. Detection of cutaneous myiasis in sheep using an 'electronic nose'. Vet Parasitol 2009; 166:293-8. [PMID: 19781857 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2009] [Revised: 08/20/2009] [Accepted: 08/26/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous myiasis (flystrike), in Australia caused primarily by Lucilia cuprina [Diptera: Calliphoridae], is a debilitating, painful and potentially lethal disease of sheep. Early detection of flystrike is difficult and continual flock surveillance is required to enable timely treatment of struck sheep. Electronic nose technology offers the potential for early and automated detection of flystrike. An electronic nose consisting of six metal oxide semiconductor sensors and temperature and humidity sensors was used to measure odours collected by dynamic headspace sampling during flystrike development in four experiments and from urine- and faeces-stained fleece in one experiment. Non-linear signal measurement techniques and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used to extract signal features and process those features for analysis of categorical separation of odour groups. The results from LDA indicated that the electronic nose accurately distinguished flystrike odour on days 1, 2 and 3 of development from that of dry wool in all experiments (P<0.05). The electronic nose was also able to discriminate flystrike odour on the day of larval implantation (day 0) in three of the four studies. In the experiment with urine- and faeces-stained wool, these odours were accurately distinguished from both dry wool and flystrike (P<0.05). This study provides proof-of-concept for the detection of flystrike using electronic nose technology. Practical methods for collection of odour in the field and suitable detection algorithms will be required for development to commercial application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A P Cramp
- Animal Research Institute, Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries,Yeerongpilly 4105, Queensland, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cho EY, Choi YL, Chae SW, Sohn JH, Ahn GH. Relationship between p53-associated proteins and estrogen receptor status in ovarian serous neoplasms. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007; 16:1000-6. [PMID: 16803476 DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00553.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
We studied the immunoexpression of p14ARF, MDM2, and p53, in addition to relationships between those protein expressions and estrogen receptor (ER)alpha in ovarian serous tumors including benign (n= 23), borderline (n= 41), and malignant (n= 94). The aberrant expressions of p14ARF, MDM2, and p53 were observed in 19.6% (31/158), 47.5% (75/158), and 39.9% (63/158) of cases, respectively. The expression of MDM2 was significantly higher in borderline tumors compared to benign (P= 0.04) and malignant (P < 0.01) tumors. p53 expression in borderline tumors was uncommon, and p14ARF expression loss was mainly observed in carcinomas. Altered expression of p14ARF, MDM2, and p53 shows significant relationship with stage. Overexpression of MDM2 (P= 0.01) and loss of p14ARF expression (P= 0.04) were significantly associated with ER expression. Our results suggest that alteration of p14ARF-MDM2-p53 pathway proteins may contribute significantly to the tumorigenesis of ovarian serous neoplasms, and ER is involved in cellular regulation of p14ARF-MDM2-p53 pathway in ovarian serous neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Y Cho
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kim HJ, Yoo TW, Park DI, Park JH, Cho YK, Sohn CI, Jeon WK, Kim BI, Kim MK, Chae SW, Sohn JH. Gene amplification and protein overexpression of HER-2/neu in human extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as detected by chromogenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry: its prognostic implication in node-positive patients. Ann Oncol 2007; 18:892-7. [PMID: 17322545 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In cholangiocarcinoma (CC), HER-2/neu protein overexpression has rarely been reported and the results are conflicting. The present study aimed to clarify the rates of HER-2/neu protein overexpression and gene amplification in human extrahepatic CC and to evaluate the correlation between HER-2/neu and several clinicopathologic features. PATIENTS AND METHODS We investigated HER-2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and HER-2/neu protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry in 55 extrahepatic CC patients who underwent curative surgery at our institution. RESULTS Overexpression of HER-2/neu protein (staining intensity score > or = 2) was found in 16 out of 55 patients (29.1%). CISH revealed that HER-2 gene signals were increased in 10 out of 55 patients (18.1%). There was a positive and significant correlation between HER-2 gene amplification and HER-2/neu protein overexpression (Spearman's rho = 0.718, P < 0.01). In subgroup with lymph node metastases, HER-2 gene amplification by CISH was significant prognostic factor for survival (OR 43.6, 95% confidence interval 1.6-1219.6). CONCLUSIONS HER-2/neu protein overexpression by HER-2 gene amplification may occur in human extrahepatic CC and constitute an independent prognostic factor in patients with lymph node metastases. In subgroup with lymph node metastases who exhibit HER-2/neu overexpression might constitute potential candidates for new adjuvant therapy, such as humanized monoclonal antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyukwan University School of Medicine, Pyung-Dong, Jongro-Ku, Seoul, South Korea.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
- Purushottam Jha
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jones Eye Institute, 4301 West Markham, #523, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
The complement system is a major component of innate immunity. During an inflammatory reaction, the eye is potentially threatened by homologous complement attack, and unregulated complement activation could lead to tissue damage and vision loss. The complement system is continuously activated at low levels in the normal eye, and intraocular complement-regulatory proteins (CRPs) tightly regulate this spontaneous complement activation so that there is elimination of potential pathogens without the induction of destructive intraocular inflammation. The presence of a complement activation product (iC3b) during the early phase of antigen and antigen-presenting cell contact is essential for the induction of systemic tolerance to antigen injected into the anterior chamber of the eye and the establishment of ocular immune privilege. The complement system and complement-regulatory proteins control intraocular inflammation in autoimmune anterior uveitis and may play an important role in the development of age-related macular degeneration. Thus, in the eye, complement functions as a double-edged sword - on one hand it provides innate immunity against pathogens while simultaneously instructing the adaptive immune response to develop tolerance to such pathogens to avoid inadvertent tissue damage in a critical organ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Ark., USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chung YW, Han DS, Park YK, Son BK, Paik CH, Lee HL, Jeon YC, Sohn JH. Association of obesity, serum glucose and lipids with the risk of advanced colorectal adenoma and cancer: a case-control study in Korea. Dig Liver Dis 2006; 38:668-72. [PMID: 16790371 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2005] [Revised: 04/03/2006] [Accepted: 05/12/2006] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies on colorectal cancer risk suggest that obesity, serum lipids and glucose might be related to colorectal carcinogenesis. This case-control study was conducted to investigate the association between obesity, serum lipids and glucose, and the risk of advanced colorectal adenoma and cancer. METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed colorectal cancers (n=105), same number of patients with advanced colorectal adenomas matched by age and sex, and the same number of controls matched by age and sex were selected in Hanyang University Guri Hospital between January 2002 and June 2004. RESULTS Adenoma and cancer group showed significantly higher levels of mean body mass index and serum glucose. Cancer group also showed significantly lower mean serum lipids levels than controls. We used an unordered polytomous logistic model to calculate multivariate odds ratios for advanced adenoma and cancer relative to controls. Higher serum glucose level was more strongly associated with increased risk of cancer relative to controls (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-9.8) than with increased risk of advanced adenoma (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-5.4). Higher body mass index was strongly associated with increased risk of advanced adenoma (odds ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 4.6-25.3), but associated with attenuated risk of cancer (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-5.8). Serum triglycerides and cholesterol levels were strongly associated with reduced risk of cancer (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.8 and odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.6, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Obesity and hyperglycaemia are positively related to advanced colorectal adenoma formation. Furthermore, hyperglycaemia plays an important role in progression to cancer. Findings on an inverse relationship between serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels and the risk of colorectal cancer may be the secondary results from metabolic or nutritional changes in advanced colorectal cancer patients and should be clarified in further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y W Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bora NS, Kaliappan S, Jha P, Xu Q, Sohn JH, Dhaulakhandi DB, Kaplan HJ, Bora PS. Complement Activation via Alternative Pathway Is Critical in the Development of Laser-Induced Choroidal Neovascularization: Role of Factor B and Factor H. J Immunol 2006; 177:1872-8. [PMID: 16849499 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.3.1872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore the role of classical, lectin, and alternative pathways of complement activation in laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV). The classical and alternative pathways were blocked in C57BL/6 mice by small interfering RNAs (siRNA) directed against C1q and factor B, respectively. C4(-/-) mice developed CNV similar to their wild-type controls and inhibition of C1q by siRNA had no effect on the development of CNV. In contrast, CNV was significantly inhibited (p < 0.001) in C5(-/-) mice and C57BL/6 mice treated with factor B siRNA. Inhibition of the alternative pathway by factor B siRNA resulted in decreased levels of membrane attack complex and angiogenic factors-vascular endothelial growth factor and TGF-beta2. Furthermore, factor B was up-regulated in complement sufficient C57BL/6 mice at day 1 postlaser and remained elevated at day 7. Significantly reduced levels of factor H were observed at day 3 in these animals. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that activation of the factor B-dependent alternative pathway, but not the classical or lectin pathways, was essential for the development of CNV in mouse model of laser-induced CNV. Thus, specific blockade of the alternative pathway may represent a therapeutically relevant strategy for the inhibition of CNV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalini S Bora
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jones Eye Institute, Pat and Willard Walker Eye Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jha P, Sohn JH, Xu Q, Wang Y, Kaplan HJ, Bora PS, Bora NS. Suppression of complement regulatory proteins (CRPs) exacerbates experimental autoimmune anterior uveitis (EAAU). J Immunol 2006; 176:7221-31. [PMID: 16751365 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.12.7221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
This study was undertaken to explore the role of complement regulatory proteins (CRPs) in experimental autoimmune anterior uveitis (EAAU). We observed that the levels of CRPs, Crry and CD59, in the eyes of Lewis rats increased during EAAU and remained elevated when the disease resolved. The in vivo role of these CRPs in EAAU was explored using neutralizing mAbs, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (AS-ODNs), and small interfering RNAs against rat Crry and CD59. Suppression of Crry in vivo at days 9, 14, or 19 by neutralizing mAb or AS-ODNs resulted in the early onset of disease, the exacerbation of intraocular inflammation, and delayed resolution. Suppression of CD59 was only effective when the Abs and ODNs were given before the onset of disease. The most profound effect on the disease was observed when a mixture of Crry and CD59 mAbs or AS-ODNs was administered. A similar effect was observed with a combination of Crry and CD59 small interfering RNA. There was no permanent histologic damage to ocular tissue after the inflammation cleared in these animals. Increased complement activation as determined by increased deposition of C3, C3 activation fragments, and membrane attack complex was observed in the eyes of Lewis rats when the function and/or expression of Crry and CD59 was suppressed. Thus, our results suggest that various ocular tissues up-regulate the expression of Crry and CD59 to avoid self-injury during autoimmune uveitis and that these CRPs play an active role in the resolution of EAAU by down-regulating complement activation in vivo.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Antibodies, Blocking/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage
- Antigens, Surface
- Autoantigens/biosynthesis
- Autoantigens/immunology
- Autoantigens/physiology
- CD59 Antigens/biosynthesis
- CD59 Antigens/genetics
- CD59 Antigens/immunology
- CD59 Antigens/physiology
- Cattle
- Complement C3/metabolism
- Complement C3-C5 Convertases/metabolism
- Complement Inactivator Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors
- Complement Inactivator Proteins/biosynthesis
- Complement Inactivator Proteins/genetics
- Complement Inactivator Proteins/physiology
- Complement Membrane Attack Complex/metabolism
- Down-Regulation/genetics
- Down-Regulation/immunology
- Male
- Melanins/immunology
- Melanins/metabolism
- Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Antisense/administration & dosage
- Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Antisense/chemical synthesis
- RNA, Small Interfering/administration & dosage
- Rats
- Rats, Inbred Lew
- Receptors, Cell Surface
- Receptors, Complement/antagonists & inhibitors
- Receptors, Complement/biosynthesis
- Receptors, Complement/genetics
- Receptors, Complement/immunology
- Uveitis, Anterior/immunology
- Uveitis, Anterior/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Purushottam Jha
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, 72205, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chung YW, Han DS, Park YK, Son BK, Paik CH, Jeon YC, Sohn JH. Huge gastric diospyrobezoars successfully treated by oral intake and endoscopic injection of Coca-Cola. Dig Liver Dis 2006; 38:515-7. [PMID: 16330268 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2005] [Revised: 10/13/2005] [Accepted: 10/27/2005] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
A diospyrobezoar is a type of phytobezoar that is considered to be harder than any other types of phytobezoars. Here, we describe a new treatment modality, which effectively and easily disrupted huge gastric diospyrobezoars. A 41-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus was admitted with lower abdominal pain and vomiting. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed three huge, round diospyrobezoars in the stomach. He was made to drink two cans of Coca-Cola every 6 h. At endoscopy the next day, the bezoars were partially dissolved and turned to be softened. We performed direct endoscopic injection of Coca-Cola into each bezoar. At repeated endoscopy the next day, the bezoars were completely dissolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y W Chung
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jha P, Sohn JH, Xu Q, Nishihori H, Wang Y, Nishihori S, Manickam B, Kaplan HJ, Bora PS, Bora NS. The complement system plays a critical role in the development of experimental autoimmune anterior uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47:1030-8. [PMID: 16505038 PMCID: PMC1975680 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of complement in ocular autoimmunity was explored in a experimental autoimmune anterior uveitis (EAAU) animal model. METHODS EAAU was induced in Lewis rats by immunization with bovine melanin-associated antigen. Complement activation in the eye was monitored by Western blot for iC3b. The importance of complement to the development of EAAU was studied by comparing the course of intraocular inflammation in normal Lewis rats (complement-sufficient) with cobra venom factor-treated rats (complement-depleted). Eyes were harvested from both complement-sufficient and complement-depleted rats for mRNA and protein analysis for IFN-gamma, IL-10, and interferon-inducible protein (IP)-10. Intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 and leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion molecule (LECAM)-1 were detected by immunofluorescent staining. OX-42 was used to investigate the importance of iC3b and CR3 interaction in EAAU. RESULTS There was a correlation between ocular complement activation and disease progression in EAAU. The incidence, duration, and severity of disease were dramatically reduced after active immunization in complement-depleted rats. Complement depletion also completely suppressed adoptive transfer EAAU. The presence of complement was critical for local production of cytokines (IFN-gamma and IL-10), chemokines (IP-10), and adhesion molecules (ICAM-1 and LECAM-1) during EAAU. Furthermore, intraocular complement activation, specifically iC3b production and engagement of complement receptor 3 (CR3), had a significant impact on disease activity in EAAU. CONCLUSIONS The study provided the novel finding that complement activation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of ocular autoimmunity and may serve as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Purushottam Jha
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Jeong-Hyeon Sohn
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Qin Xu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Hiroki Nishihori
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Yali Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Saori Nishihori
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Balasubramanian Manickam
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Henry J. Kaplan
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Puran S. Bora
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Nalini S. Bora
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kim JG, Sohn SK, Kim DH, Baek JH, Jeon SB, Chae YS, Lee KB, Park JS, Sohn JH, Kim JC, Park IK. Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 2005; 93:1117-21. [PMID: 16251869 PMCID: PMC2361495 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). In total, 37 patients with stage III or IV SCCHN were enrolled on the study. The chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of intravenous cisplatin of 80 mg m−2 on day 1 and oral capecitabine 825 mg m−2 twice daily from day 1 to day 14 at 3-week intervals. The radiotherapy (1.8–2.0 Gy 1 fraction day−1 to a total dose of 70–70.2 Gy) was delivered to the primary tumour site and neck. The primary tumour sites were as follows: oral cavity (n=6), oropharynx (n=11), hypopharynx (n=8), larynx (n=3), nasopharynx (n=6), and paranasal sinus (n=3). After the chemoradiotherapy, 29 complete responses (78.4%) and 6 partial responses (16.2%) were confirmed. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred only in two patients, plus grade 3 febrile neutropenia was observed only in one patient. At a median follow-up duration of 19.8 months, the estimated overall survival and progression-free survival rate at 2-year was 76.8 and 57.9%, respectively. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with locally advanced SCCHN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J G Kim
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - S K Sohn
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - D H Kim
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - J H Baek
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - S B Jeon
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Y S Chae
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - K B Lee
- Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - J S Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 50 Samduck 2-Ga, Jung-Gu, Daegu 700-712, Korea; E-mail:
| | - J H Sohn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - J C Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - I K Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University, College of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bora NS, Sohn JH, Bora PS, Kaplan HJ, Kulkarni P. Anti-inflammatory effects of specific cyclooxygenase 2,5-lipoxygenase, and inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on experimental autoimmune anterior uveitis (EAAU). Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2005; 13:183-9. [PMID: 16019677 PMCID: PMC1851916 DOI: 10.1080/09273940590928643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Inflammation, in general, causes the release of a variety of inflammatory mediators that in turn induce cyclooxygenase (COX) 2, nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and 5-lipoxygense (LP) synthesis, producing large amounts of inflammatory prostaglandins (PG), nitric oxide (NO), and leukotriene (LT) B4. Therefore, inhibition of these enzymes may abrogate intraocular inflammation in experimental autoimmune anterior uveitis (EAAU). METHODS Lewis rats were immunized with melanin-associated antigen (MAA) isolated from bovine iris and ciliary body. These animals were divided into three groups. The first group of rats received subcutaneous injection of COX 2 inhibitor CS 236 at different time points. The second and third groups of animals received subcutaneous aminoguanidine (AG), an iNOS inhibitor, and nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), a 5-LP inhibitor, respectively. Control animals received vehicle. Rat eyes were examined daily by slit-lamp biomicroscopy from Day 7 to 30 post injection for uveitis. Animals were also sacrificed at various time points for histologic analysis. RESULTS Control animals developed severe EAAU in both eyes. The disease started in these animals on Day 12 post immunization and lasted for ten days. Interestingly, CS 236, a potent COX 2 inhibitor, completely abrogated EAAU when the animals were treated daily from the Day 0 to 14 or Day 0 to 20 after MAA injection. Furthermore, daily CS 236 treatment after the onset of EAAU (Day 14-20) significantly reduced the severity (both clinical and histologic) of EAAU and shortened the duration of disease. iNOS inhibitor (AG) and 5-LP inhibitor (NDGA) partially attenuated EAAU. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that EAAU was partially attenuated by AG and NDGA. Interestingly, CS 236, a potent COX 2 inhibitor, completely inhibited EAAU in male Lewis rats most likely by inhibiting the initial phase and onset of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalini S Bora
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, 40202, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sohn JH, Song JW, Seo JB, Do KH, Lee JS, Kim DK, Song KS, Lim TH. Case report: pericardial rupture and cardiac herniation after blunt trauma: a case diagnosed using cardiac MRI. Br J Radiol 2005; 78:447-9. [PMID: 15845942 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/31146905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Pericardial rupture following blunt chest trauma is rare, and is not usually diagnosed pre-operatively. If pericardial rupture is not recognized and treated promptly, it may be fatal owing to cardiac herniation. We report a case of traumatic herniation of the heart for which a CT scan and MRI made a major contribution to the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Sohn
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bora PS, Sohn JH, Cruz JMC, Jha P, Nishihori H, Wang Y, Kaliappan S, Kaplan HJ, Bora NS. Role of complement and complement membrane attack complex in laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. J Immunol 2005; 174:491-7. [PMID: 15611275 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.1.491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Choroidal neovascularization (CNV), or choroidal angiogenesis, is the hallmark of age-related macular degeneration and a leading cause of visual loss after age 55. The pathogenesis of new choroidal vessel formation is poorly understood. Although inflammation has been implicated in the development of CNV, the role of complement in CNV has not been explored experimentally. A reliable way to produce CNV in animals is to rupture Bruch's membrane with laser photocoagulation. A murine model of laser-induced CNV in C57BL/6 mice revealed the deposition of C3 and membrane attack complex (MAC) in the neovascular complex. CNV was inhibited by complement depletion using cobra venom factor and did not develop in C3(-/-) mice. Anti-murine C6 Abs in C57BL/6 mice inhibited MAC formation and also resulted in the inhibition of CNV. Vascular endothelial growth factor, TGF-beta2, and beta-fibroblast growth factor were elevated in C57BL/6 mice after laser-induced CNV; complement depletion resulted in a marked reduction in the level of these angiogenic factors. Thus, activation of complement, specifically the formation of MAC, is essential for the development of laser- induced choroidal angiogenesis in mice. It is possible that a similar mechanism may be involved in the pathophysiology of other angiogenesis essential diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puran S Bora
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, University of Louisville, 301E Muhammad Ali Boulevard, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bora NS, Sohn JH, Kang SG, Cruz JMC, Nishihori H, Suk HJ, Wang Y, Kaplan HJ, Bora PS. Type I collagen is the autoantigen in experimental autoimmune anterior uveitis. J Immunol 2004; 172:7086-94. [PMID: 15153531 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.7086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
This study was undertaken to identify and characterize the Ag responsible for the induction of experimental autoimmune anterior uveitis (EAAU). Melanin-associated Ag isolated from bovine iris and ciliary body was digested with the proteolytic enzyme V8 protease to solubilize the proteins and the pathogenic protein was purified to homogeneity. Lewis rats were sensitized to various fractions and investigated for the development of anterior uveitis and an immune response to the purified Ag. The uveitogenic Ag had a mass of 22 kDa (SDS-PAGE) and an isoelectric point of 6.75. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of this protein demonstrated 100% homology with the bovine type I collagen alpha-2 chain starting from amino acid 385 and will be referred to as CI-alpha2 (22 kDa). Animals immunized with bovine CI-alpha2 (22 kDa) developed both cellular and humoral immunity to the Ag. They developed anterior uveitis only if the CI-alpha2 chain underwent proteolysis and if the bound carbohydrates were intact. EAAU induced by CI-alpha2 (22 kDa) can be adoptively transferred to naive syngenic rats by primed CD4(+) T cells. EAAU could not be induced by the adoptive transfer of sera obtained from animals immunized with CI-alpha2 (22 kDa). The alpha-1 and alpha-2 chains (intact or proteolytically cleaved) of type I collagen from calfskin were not pathogenic. Although human anterior uveitis has been historically characterized as a collagen disease, this is first time collagen has been directly identified as the target autoantigen in uveitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalini S Bora
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kentucky Lions Eye Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sohn JH, Smith R, Yoong E, Hudson N, Kim TI. Evaluation of a novel wind tunnel for the measurement of the kinetics of odour emissions from piggery effluent. Water Sci Technol 2004; 50:49-55. [PMID: 15484742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
A novel laboratory wind tunnel, with the capability to control factors such as air flow-rate, was developed to measure the kinetics of odour emissions from liquid effluent. The tunnel allows the emission of odours and other volatiles under an atmospheric transport system similar to ambient conditions. Sensors for wind speed, temperature and humidity were installed and calibrated. To calibrate the wind tunnel, trials were performed to determine the gas recovery efficiency under different air flow-rates (ranging from 0.001 to 0.028m3/s) and gas supply rates (ranging from 2.5 to 10.0 L/min) using a standard CO gas mixture. The results have shown gas recovery efficiencies ranging from 61.7 to 106.8%, while the average result from the trials was 81.14%. From statistical analysis, it was observed that the highest, most reliable gas recovery efficiency of the tunnel was 88.9%. The values of air flow-rate and gas supply rate corresponding to the highest gas recovery efficiency were 0.028 m3/s and 10.0 L/min respectively. This study suggested that the wind tunnel would provide precise estimates of odour emission rate. However, the wind tunnel needs to be calibrated to compensate for errors caused by different air flow-rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Sohn
- Intensive Livestock Systems Unit, Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PO Box 102, 203 Tor street, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|