Chemical ecology in conservation biocontrol: new perspectives for plant protection

Threats to food security require novel sustainable agriculture practices to manage insect pests. One strategy is conservation biological control (CBC), which relies on pest control services provided by local populations of arthropod natural enemies. Research has explored manipulative use of chemical information from plants and insects that act as attractant cues for natural enemies (predators and parasitoids) and repellents of pests. In this review, we reflect on past strategies using chemical ecology in CBC, such as herbivore-induced plant volatiles and the push-pull technique, and propose future directions, including leveraging induced plant defenses in crop plants, repellent insect-based signaling, and genetically engineered crops. Further, we discuss how climate change may disrupt CBC and stress the importance of context dependency and yield outcomes.

Plant Water Stress Reduces Aphid Performance: Exploring Mechanisms Driven by Water Stress Intensity

Drought alters plant traits in ways that affect herbivore performance. However, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the plant-derived mechanisms that mediate insect responses to drought. Water stress occurs along gradients of intensity, and the impacts of drought intensity on plant-insect interactions is understudied. Here, we assessed aphid performance on wheat plants exposed to a gradient of water stress and measured plant nutrients and phytohormones that may mediate aphid response to drought. We show that water stress reduced aphid performance, and the negative effect grew stronger as the magnitude of water stress increased. The plant response to water limitation was not consistent across the stress gradient and was reliant on the trait measured. Water limitation did not affect whole-plant nitrogen; however, water limitation did reduce amino acid concentration and increase sugars, but only under high stress intensity. The phytohormones abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA), and the expression of their associated gene transcripts, were also differentially affected by water stress intensity. In well-watered conditions, aphid feeding increased concentrations of the defense-related hormones SA and JA over time; however, any amount of water limitation prevented aphid induction of JA. Although aphids may experience a reprieve from JA-related defenses in stressed conditions, SA levels remain high in response to aphid feeding, indicating aphids are still vulnerable to SA-related defenses. Any level of water stress also increased the expression of a callose-associated gene transcript, a physical defense that impairs feeding. Thus, poor aphid performance on mildly-stressed plants was correlated with increased plant defenses, whereas poor performance on highly-stressed plants was correlated with stronger plant defense induction and reduced plant nutritional quality. Understanding the mechanisms driving aphid and plant performance under water stress conditions can improve our ability to predict how aphid populations will respond to climate change.

Effects of Plant Stress on Aphid-Parasitoid Interactions: Drought Improves Aphid Suppression

Drought events have the potential to mediate tri-trophic interactions. Changes in plant quality influence herbivore performance, which affects prey availability and quality for natural enemies. Parasitoid wasps are particularly vulnerable to these changes since their development is inextricably linked to that of their prey. However, we know little about the indirect effects of plant water limitation on parasitoid performance, especially the consequences of mild water limitation. This study investigated the ability of a parasitoid wasp (Aphidius colemani Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)) to suppress aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi L. (Hemiptera: Aphididae)) populations on well-watered, mildly stressed, or highly stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L. (Poales: Poaceae)). We then investigated the role that aphid body size and behavioral interactions might play in wasp acceptance of aphid hosts. We found improved aphid suppression under mild and high-water limitation, but the underlying mechanisms were different. Mild-stress appeared to maximize parasitoid performance, as indicated by the highest mummy production. Aphids were larger when feeding on mildly stressed plants than on any other treatment, which suggests improved aphid quality for parasitoids. Improved aphid suppression under high-stress may have been driven by enhanced nonconsumptive effects. Despite improved aphid suppression, mummy formation was lowest on highly stressed plants. High-stress conditions have been shown to negatively affect aphid performance, so improved aphid suppression may be driven by poor aphid performance exacerbating the cost of interactions with parasitoids, such as stinging. No differences were observed in parasitoid foraging behaviors such as antennation or stinging across any treatments. This study highlights the importance of plant water stress intensity in affecting outcomes of parasitoid-host interactions.