International validation of the Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score in heart failure

AIMS

Current European heart failure (HF) guidelines suggest the use of risk score: among them, the Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score has demonstrated to be one of the most accurate. However, the risk scores are still poorly implemented in clinical practice, also due to the lack of strong evidence regarding their external validation in different populations. Thus, the current study was designed as an external validation test of the MECKI score in an international multicentre setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of patients diagnosed with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) across international centres (not Italian), retrospectively recruited. Collected data included demographics, HF aetiology, laboratory testing, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiographic findings, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) results as described in the original MECKI score publication. A total of 1042 patients across 8 international centres (7 European and 1 Asian) were included and followed up from 1998 till 2019. Patients were divided according to the calculated MECKI scores into three subgroups: (i) MECKI score <10%, (ii) 10-20%, and (iii) ≥ 20%. Survival analysis comparison among the three MECKI score subgroups showed a worse prognosis in patients with higher MECKI score value: median event-free survival times were 4396 days for MECKI score <10%, 3457 days for 10-20%, and 1022 days for ≥20% (P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves (AUC) were like those reported in the original internal validation studies.

CONCLUSION

In patients diagnosed with HFrEF, the power of the MECKI score was confirmed in terms of prognosis and risk stratification, supporting its implementation as advised by the HF guidelines.

Return to sports after COVID-19: a position paper from the Dutch Sports Cardiology Section of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to preventive measures worldwide. With the decline of infection rates, less stringent restrictions for sports and exercise are being implemented. COVID-19 is associated with significant cardiovascular complications; however there are limited data on cardiovascular complications and long-term outcomes in both competitive (elite) athletes and highly active individuals. Based on different categories of disease severity (asymptomatic, regional/systemic symptoms, hospitalisation, myocardial damage, and/or myocarditis), in this point-of-view article we offer the (sports) cardiologist or sports physician in the Netherlands a practical guide to pre-participation screening, and diagnostic and management strategies in all athletes >16 years of age after COVID-19 infection.

P1927A European randomised controlled trial for m-health guided cardiac rehabilitation in the elderly; results of the EU-CaRE RCT study

Introduction

Knowledge about effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in the elderly is limited. Participation rates in supervised CR are consistently lower in the elderly and innovative interventions are needed. The EU has granted a CR study project; a randomised controlled trial conducted in 5 European countries, investigating the effectiveness of mobile telemonitoring guided CR (mCR) in elderly cardiac patients who declined regular CR.

Methods

Patients ≥65 years with indication for CR who declined regular CR were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomised between regular care (without CR) and a 6-month mCR programme: dedicated programmed smartphone, heartrate monitoring (target HR zones) and coaching. The primary endpoint is the difference in VO2peak between 6-months follow-up and baseline.

Results

Between 2015 and 2018 179 patients were included. Baseline characteristics between groups (table 1) did not differ significantly, except for hypertension. The difference in VO2peak was significantly better in the mCR group (table 1). After correction (mixed linear model) for baseline VO2 peak (fixed factor) and centre (random factor) this difference remained significant. Mean number of registered activity sessions was 4.79 (95% CI; 4.07–5.50) per patient per week.

Table 1. Baseline and primary outcome parameters Baseline Control Programme (n=90) mCR Programme (n=89) P-value Gender (m/f) 76/14 69/20 0.238 Age (mean±SD) 73.57±5.46 72.38±5.37 0.121 Diabetes 15 (16.7%) 23 (25.8%) 0.133 Hypertension 60 (66.7%) 73 (82.0%) 0.019* Hypercholesteremia 71 (78.3%) 74 (83.1%) 0.468 Normal LV-function 48/89 (53.9%) 53/89 (59.6%) 0.497 Index event (CABG/Valve/PCI/none) 0.735   Cardiac history prior to index event 48/89 (53.9%) 53/89 (59.6%) 0.702   Non cardiac comorbidity 40 (44.4%) 44 (49.4%) 0.503 Results   Baseline VO2peak (ml/kg/min) (95% CI) 19.83 (18.65–21.01) 18.78 (18.67–19.89) 0.191   Delta VO2peak at 6 months (ml/kg/min) (95% CI) 0.20 4 (−0.34–0.83) 1.62 (0.86–2.39) 0.005*   Corrected delta VO2peak at 6 months (ml/kg/min) 0.50 (−1.04–2.04) 1.65 (0.11–3.2) 0.015* *Significant.

Conclusions

The application of mCR in elderly patients who declined regular CR results in a better physical condition after 6 months. Compliance to mCR was excellent.

Acknowledgement/Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 634439, and funding from the Swiss Government.