"We Eat Without Thinking: We Just Eat, Eat, Eat" - A Thematic Exploration of Cultural Practices of Ethnically Diverse Youth and Their Parents Who Are at Risk for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE

Cultural beliefs and practices influence management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in youth and their parents, and have been minimally explored, limiting our understanding and implementation of preventative healthcare. An enhanced evidence base may inform comprehensive, effective community health nursing (CHN). Thus, the purpose of this research was to explore the influence of youths' and their parents' understandings of cultural practices on risk for prediabetes and T2D.

DESIGN

A secondary thematic analysis was conducted. Qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with 24 participants who were purposefully recruited from two mid-western Canadian high schools.

FINDINGS

Three themes and one subtheme were developed including: 1) Food Culture and related subtheme, Acculturation to New Food Choices; 2) Exercise Culture: Adapting Physical Activity in a New Country; and, 3) Risk Perception of the Effects of T2D on Loved Ones: Behavior Modifications and Motivation. Cultural practices and acculturation to food such as dietary choices, preparation, large portions, different dietary staples, food availability, and food gathering patterns influenced health behaviors. Similarly, changes in exercise patterns including adapting to Western video game culture, weather in Canada, and the new way of life emerged as important factors that impacted health. Participants who perceived a familial risk of diabetes identified behavior modifications such as regular diabetes screening, nutrition counseling, healthier food choices, smaller food portions, and an increase in physical activity as strategies to reduce risk of prediabetes and diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a critical need for research aimed at prediabetes and T2D prevention, and intervention programs targeting ethnically diverse groups where prediabetes and T2D is most prevalent.

CLINICAL EVIDENCE

Community health nurses are at the core of implementing and supporting disease prevention and, therefore, may consider the findings from this research to develop family-focused, intergenerational, and culturally-based interventions.

A investigation into hope, self-efficacy, distress and uncertainty in parents who have a child with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness

PURPOSE

To examine the experiences of parents who are caring for a child with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness (LTI/LLI) including levels of uncertainty, distress, hope, and self-efficacy to determine if there are significant variations with respect to demographic characteristics.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data for this analysis are derived from a quasi-experimental evaluation of a support intervention with a purposeful sample of parental caregivers from a western Canadian province. Participants completed a demographic survey and four quantitative measures at baseline and following use of the support intervention.

RESULTS

Many parents had high scores of hope and self-efficacy, with highest levels of hope amongst parents who could stay at home with their children, and higher self-efficacy expressed by parents without financial concerns. Increased levels of uncertainty and distress were found amongst parents without other children living in the home, and those with financial concerns, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory analysis found that many parents experienced clinically significant distress along with uncertainty. The results determined that caring for children in the home other than the ill child significantly decreased uncertainty. High levels of parental hope and self-efficacy were frequently identified, with variations reflecting differences in social roles and stressors. The results contribute to an increased understanding of the value of support resources including parental leave and financial support.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Pediatric nurses may consider adopting an approach to caring for families with children in treatment for LLIs/LTIs that gives high priority to promoting hope and self-efficacy while ensuring access to support resources.

Co-Developed Indigenous Educational Materials for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Canadian Indigenous populations experience significantly more chronic kidney disease (CKD) than the general population. Indigenous people who live in rural and remote areas may also have difficulty accessing both information and care for their CKD. Informed decision making about treatment options for advancing kidney disease may be delayed, which can result in poor health outcomes and decreased quality of life. Moreover, Indigenous people may experience marginalization within Western health care systems.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this scoping review is to identify culturally appropriate and co-developed Indigenous educational tools that will ultimately support CKD learning and end-stage kidney treatment decision making.

DESIGN

Scoping Review.

SETTING

Databases included Embase, CINAHL, Medline (OVID), ERIC, and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology Gray Matters.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS

Community-based Indigenous patients, families, health care workers, and community members.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the literature to explore the availability of co-developed Indigenous educational tools and material for CKD treatment options. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were reviewed independently by 2 reviewers with disagreements resolved through a third. All aspects of this project, including searching the databases were done in consultation with an Indigenous Elder.

RESULTS

Only one retrieved article identified a comprehensive CKD tool co-developed by researchers, health care providers, and an Indigenous community. Three themes emerged from the scoping review that may inform characteristics of co-developed tools: cultural appropriateness; appraisal of utility and effectiveness and; content informed by co-development of traditional and Western chronic disease knowledge.

LIMITATIONS

Consistent with scoping review methodology, the methodological quality of included studies was not assessed. In addition, it was difficult to synthesize the findings from the research and gray literature.

CONCLUSION

Little is known about the co-development of Indigenous educational tools for CKD. Further in-depth understanding is required about how to best engage with Indigenous communities, specifically to co-develop contextualized CKD tools that are acceptable to Indigenous people.Trial registration: Not applicable as this review described secondary data.