Spatially coordinated heterochromatinization of long synaptic genes in fragile X syndrome

Short tandem repeat (STR) instability causes transcriptional silencing in several repeat expansion disorders. In fragile X syndrome (FXS), mutation-length expansion of a CGG STR represses FMR1 via local DNA methylation. Here, we find megabase-scale H3K9me3 domains on autosomes and encompassing FMR1 on the X chromosome in FXS patient-derived iPSCs, iPSC-derived neural progenitors, EBV-transformed lymphoblasts, and brain tissue with mutation-length CGG expansion. H3K9me3 domains connect via inter-chromosomal interactions and demarcate severe misfolding of TADs and loops. They harbor long synaptic genes replicating at the end of S phase, replication-stress-induced double-strand breaks, and STRs prone to stepwise somatic instability. CRISPR engineering of the mutation-length CGG to premutation length reverses H3K9me3 on the X chromosome and multiple autosomes, refolds TADs, and restores gene expression. H3K9me3 domains can also arise in normal-length iPSCs created with perturbations linked to genome instability, suggesting their relevance beyond FXS. Our results reveal Mb-scale heterochromatinization and trans interactions among loci susceptible to instability.

CTCF-Mediated Genome Architecture Regulates the Dosage of Mitotically Stable Mono-allelic Expression of Autosomal Genes

The mechanisms that guide the clonally stable random mono-allelic expression of autosomal genes remain enigmatic. We show that (1) mono-allelically expressed (MAE) genes are assorted and insulated from bi-allelically expressed (BAE) genes through CTCF-mediated chromatin loops; (2) the cell-type-specific dynamics of mono-allelic expression coincides with the gain and loss of chromatin insulator sites; (3) dosage of MAE genes is more sensitive to the loss of chromatin insulation than that of BAE genes; and (4) inactive alleles of MAE genes are significantly more insulated than active alleles and are de-repressed upon CTCF depletion. This alludes to a topology wherein the inactive alleles of MAE genes are insulated from the spatial interference of transcriptional states from the neighboring bi-allelic domains via CTCF-mediated loops. We propose that CTCF functions as a typical insulator on inactive alleles, but facilitates transcription through enhancer-linking on active allele of MAE genes, indicating widespread allele-specific regulatory roles of CTCF.

Biased visibility in Hi-C datasets marks dynamically regulated condensed and decondensed chromatin states genome-wide

Background

Proximity ligation based techniques, like Hi-C, involve restriction digestion followed by ligation of formaldehyde cross-linked chromatin. Distinct chromatin states can impact the restriction digestion, and hence the visibility in the contact maps, of engaged loci. Yet, the extent and the potential impact of digestion bias remain obscure and under-appreciated in the literature.

Results

Through analysis of 45 Hi-C datasets, lamina-associated domains (LADs), inactive X-chromosome in mammals, and polytene bands in fly, we first established that the DNA in condensed chromatin had lesser accessibility to restriction endonucleases used in Hi-C as compared to that in decondensed chromatin. The observed bias was independent of known systematic biases, was not appropriately corrected by existing computational methods, and needed an additional optimization step. We then repurposed this bias to identify novel condensed domains outside LADs, which were bordered by insulators and were dynamically associated with the polycomb mediated epigenetic and transcriptional states during development.

Conclusions

Our observations suggest that the corrected one-dimensional read counts of existing Hi-C datasets can be reliably repurposed to study the gene-regulatory dynamics associated with chromatin condensation and decondensation, and that the existing Hi-C datasets should be interpreted with cautions.

Does genome surveillance explain the global discrepancy between binding and effect of chromatin factors?

Knocking out a chromatin factor often does not alter the transcription of its binding targets. What explains the observed disconnect between binding and effect? We hypothesize that this discrepancy could be associated with the role of chromatin factors in maintaining genetic and epigenetic integrity at promoters, and not necessarily with transcription. Through re-analysis of published datasets, we present several lines of evidence that support our hypothesis and deflate the popular assumptions. We also tested the hypothesis through mutation accumulation assays on yeast knockouts of chromatin factors. Altogether, the proposed hypothesis presents a simple explanation for the global discord between chromatin factor binding and effect. Future work in this direction might fortify the hypothesis and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.