Coping with COVID in corrections: a qualitative study among the recently incarcerated on infection control and the acceptability of wastewater-based surveillance

BACKGROUND

Correctional settings are hotspots for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Social and biological risk factors contribute to higher rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among justice-involved individuals. Rapidly identifying new cases in congregate settings is essential to promote proper isolation and quarantine. We sought perspectives of individuals incarcerated during COVID-19 on how to improve carceral infection control and their perspectives on acceptability of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) accompanying individual testing.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 adults who self-reported being incarcerated throughout the United States between March 2020 and May 2021. We asked participants about facility enforcement of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 guidelines, and acceptability of integrating WBS into SARS-CoV-2 monitoring strategies at their most recent facility. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the study sample and report on acceptability of WBS. We analyzed qualitative data thematically using an iterative process.

RESULTS

Participants were predominantly Black or multiple races (50%) and men (75%); 46 years old on average. Most received a mask during their most recent incarceration (90%), although only 40% received counseling on proper mask wearing. A quarter of participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 at intake. Most (70%) believed they were exposed to the virus while incarcerated. Reoccurring themes included (1) Correctional facility environment leading to a sense of insecurity, (2) Perceptions that punitive conditions in correctional settings were exacerbated by the pandemic; (3) Importance of peers as a source of information about mitigation measures; (4) Perceptions that the safety of correctional environments differed from that of the community during the pandemic; and (5) WBS as a logical strategy, with most (68%) believing WBS would work in the last correctional facility they were in, and 79% preferred monitoring SARS-CoV-2 levels through WBS rather than relying on just individual testing.

CONCLUSION

Participants supported routine WBS to monitor for SARS-CoV-2. Integrating WBS into existing surveillance strategies at correctional facilities may minimize the impact of future COVID-19 outbreaks while conserving already constrained resources. To enhance the perception and reality that correctional systems are maximizing mitigation, future measures might include focusing on closer adherence to CDC recommendations and clarity about disease pathogenesis with residents.

The effects of multiple shunt revisions on neuropsychological functioning and memory

The focus of this study was to determine the effect of multiple shunt revisions on cognition and memory. The present study attempted to document a discrepancy in the functioning of children with hydrocephalus having numerous shunt revisions compared to those with only an initial shunt surgery. Researchers have found an increasing number of children with hydrocephalus requiring shunt revisions. In the current literature there are many conflicting views regarding the effects of hydrocephalus on cognition and memory. Many researchers report that properly treated hydrocephalus will not have a negative impact on cognitive functioning. Furthermore, researchers found that factors such as the total number of shunt revisions do not negatively impact global intellectual ability. Forty-six subjects between the ages of six and 16 years participated in the study. The subjects were recruited from the Department of Neurosurgery at an urban pediatric hospital. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. Independent variables for the study included shunt revisions, seizures, and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Subject groupings were based on whether the subjects required multiple shunt revisions or single shunt placement and the presence or absence of seizures and ADHD. Dependent variables included the subject's performance on measures of cognition and memory. Measures of functioning included the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Third Edition and the Wide Range Assessment of Learning and Memory-Screener. The results of this study did not support the presence of cognitive or memory impairments as a result of multiple shunt revisions. Anecdotal findings noted that seizures were the only independent variable to significantly account for the observed variance in scores of cognition, specifically Full Scale IQ, Verbal Comprehension, and Perceptual Organization.