Systematic review and meta-analysis of church-based interventions to improve cardiovascular disease risk factors

BACKGROUND

Church-based interventions have been shown to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and could reduce health disparities in groups with a high burden of CVD. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of church-based interventions for CVD risk factor improvement and to examine the types of interventions that are effective.

METHODS

Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and manual reference searches were conducted through November 2021. Study inclusion criteria were church-based interventions delivered in the United States to address CVD risk factors. Interventions targeted barriers to improving blood pressure, weight, diabetes, physical activity, cholesterol, diet, or smoking. Two investigators independently extracted study data. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 81 studies with 17,275 participants were included. The most common interventions included increasing physical activity (n = 69), improving diet (n = 67), stress management (n = 20), medication adherence (n = 9), and smoking cessation (n = 7). Commonly used approaches for implementation included cultural tailoring of the intervention, health coaching, group education sessions, inclusion of spiritual components in the intervention, and home health monitoring. Church-based interventions were associated with significant reductions in body weight (-3.1 lb, [95% CI, -5.8, -1.2], N = 15), waist circumference (-0.8 in, [CI, -1.4, -0.1], N = 6), and systolic blood pressure (-2.3 mm Hg, [CI, -4.3, -0.3], N = 13).

CONCLUSIONS

Church-based interventions targeting CVD risk factors are effective for reducing CVD risk factors, particularly in populations with health disparities. These findings can be used to design future church-based studies and programs to improve cardiovascular health.

eHealth literacy and web-based patient portal usage among kidney and liver transplant recipients

Patient portals promote self-management, but require skills with electronic health information which can be measured by a patient's eHealth literacy. We aimed to describe eHealth literacy among a population of kidney transplant (KT) and liver transplant (LT) recipients and to investigate the relationship between eHealth literacy and Web-based patient portal utilization. We conducted phone surveys (August 2016-March 2017) among 178 KT and 110 LT recipients at two large transplant centers, including the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and items assessing routine portal usage. Portal users were defined as routine if usage was every day, weekly, or monthly. The mean eHEALS score was 30.9 (SD: 5.4), and 45.4% routinely used the patient portal more than a few times per month. Routine users had higher eHealth literacy than non-routine users and non-users (31.97 vs. 29.97 vs. 28.20, p < .001). Routine users had higher eHealth literacy scores compared with non-users after adjusting for transplant organ type, age, educational level, employment status, mobile Internet access, and transplant center (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.17). KT and LT recipients who routinely use patient portals have high eHealth literacy compared with other diseased populations, which should be leveraged by encouraging routine usage to improve post-transplant health and medication adherence.