Disparities in Patient Portal Use Among Adults With Chronic Conditions

Importance

Disparities in patient access and use of health care portals have been documented. Limited research has evaluated disparities in portal use during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective

To assess prevalence of health care portal use before, during, and after the most restrictive phase of the pandemic (2019-2022) among the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions (C3) cohort and to investigate any disparities in use by sociodemographic factors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study uses data from the C3 study, an ongoing, longitudinal, telephone-based survey of participants with multiple chronic conditions. Participants were middle aged and older-adult primary care patients who had an active portal account, recruited from a single academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois, between 2019 and 2022. Data were analyzed between March and June 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes of portal use (ie, number of days of portal login by year) were recorded for all study participants by the electronic data warehouse. All parent studies had uniform sociodemographic data and measures of social support, self-efficacy, health literacy, and health activation.

Results

Of 536 participants (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [12.0] years; 336 [62.7%] female), 44 (8.2%) were Hispanic or Latinx, 142 (26.5%) were non-Hispanic Black, 322 (60.1%) were non-Hispanic White, and 20 individuals (3.7%) identified as other race, including Asian, Native American or Alaskan Native, and self-reported other race. In multivariable analyses, portal login activity was higher during the 3 years of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the 2019 baseline. Higher portal login activity was associated with adequate health literacy (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.18-1.94) and multimorbidity (IRR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.17-1.64). Lower portal activity was associated with older age (≥70 years: IRR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85) and female sex (IRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.91). Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, lower portal activity was observed among Hispanic or Latinx patients (IRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89), non-Hispanic Black patients (IRR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.83), and patients who identified as other race (IRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.64).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study using data from the C3 study identified changes in portal use over time and highlighted populations that had lower access to health information. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in portal use. Sociodemographic disparities by sex and age were reduced, although disparities by health literacy widened. A brief validated health literacy measure may serve as a useful digital literacy screening tool to identify patients who need further support.

Longitudinal Associations Between Multimorbidities and Patient-Reported Quality of Life

OBJECTIVES

The global prevalence of multimorbidity is increasing as the population ages. As individuals get older, they are likely to develop multiple chronic conditions, and nearly two-thirds of older adults in the United States are estimated to experience 2 or more chronic conditions. The present preregistered study examined whether multimorbidity was associated with longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (i.e., anxiety, depression, and physical function) and whether these associations were moderated by sociodemographic factors (i.e., sex, race, marital status, income, insurance, and education).

METHODS

Data come from the Health Literacy and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults Longitudinal Study (LitCog), a prospective cohort study of English-speaking older adults (N = 900). At each measurement occasion, participants reported anxiety, depression, and physical function using the Patient Reported Outcomes Information System, chronic conditions, and sociodemographic characteristics. We employed multilevel growth models to estimate changes in health-related quality of life, with multimorbidities as a predictor and sociodemographics as covariates.

RESULTS

Results indicated that individuals with multiple chronic conditions reported persistently high levels of anxiety and depression, and worse physical function. We found evidence for racial health disparities, such that individuals who identified as non-White experienced worse health-related quality of life as multimorbidities increased, relative to White participants.

DISCUSSION

These results contribute to the current conversation about the long-term impacts of structural and systemic barriers experienced by minoritized groups. We further discuss the public health implications of multimorbidity in older adulthood.

Caregiver health literacy and health task performance: Findings from the LitCog caregiver cohort study

Objective

Many older adults receive assistance in managing their chronic conditions. Yet complicating the utility of caregiver support is whether caregivers have sufficient skills to aid in older adults' health management at home. We examined associations between caregiver health literacy and performance on health tasks.

Methods

Caregivers to older adults enrolled in a cognitive aging cohort were recruited to participate in a supplemental interview (n = 97). Caregivers completed one structured interview that included assessments of health literacy and health task performance.

Results

Caregivers demonstrated a range of health literacy skills (44% adequate, 36% marginal, 20% low health literacy). In adjusted analyses, caregivers with marginal and low health literacy demonstrated worse overall performance on the health tasks, and poorer interpretation of health information presented on print documents and recall of spoken communication (p's < 0.05).

Conclusion

Caregivers with marginal or low health literacy demonstrated poorer performance on everyday health tasks that they commonly assist older adults with. The application of health literacy best-practices to support better training and capacity-building for caregivers is warranted.

Innovation

Few studies have considered the health literacy skills of caregivers and its application to caregivers' abilities to carry out common supportive tasks.

Impact of COVID-19 on the capacity to self-manage health and chronic conditions

Objective

To investigate well-being, lifestyle behaviors, self-management capacity and healthcare utilization among adults with chronic conditions at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Data was collected from two interviewer-administered telephone surveys conducted between March 27 - May 22, 2020. Participants were patients at Chicago-area clinics. Self-report and validated measures were used for study-related outcomes.

Results

A total of 553 participants (age range 23-88) completed data collection at both timepoints. One in five (20.7%) participants experienced stress due to the coronavirus most or all the time and rates of negative well-being were high (WHO-5 Index mean = 58.7%). Almost a quarter (22.3%) engaged in hazardous drinking and 79.7% reported insufficient physical activity. Nearly one in four participants (23.7%) avoided seeking medical care due to worry about COVID-19. In multivariable analyses, greater COVID-19 related stress was associated with less physical activity, lower self-efficacy, greater difficulty managing health and medications, and delays in seeking medical care due to the coronavirus.

Conclusions

Mental well-being, lifestyle behaviors, self-management capacity, and healthcare utilization were impacted in the months following the COVID outbreak.

Innovation

These findings suggest health systems should implement proactive measures for detecting and treating emotional and behavioral COVID-related concerns.

LitCog Caregiver Cohort: a prospective, observational cohort study investigating US caregivers' health literacy, self-care skills and cognitive function

INTRODUCTION

Many older adults receive assistance in managing chronic conditions. Yet complicating the utility of caregiver support is whether caregivers have sufficient skills to aid in a patient's self-care. Health literacy and cognition are important determinants of older adults' health outcomes, but few studies have examined caregiver health literacy, cognition and self-care skills and their relations to patient outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will expand an ongoing cognitive ageing cohort study (LitCog) to enroll a parallel caregiver cohort. Caregivers are eligible if they are (1) ≥18 years of age, (2) provided care for ≥6 months and (3) assisted with at least one activity of daily living, instrumental activity of daily living or health management task. Caregivers will complete interviews at time points corresponding with the LitCog participant interviews. Caregivers will complete assessments of health literacy, self-care skills, cognitive function, caregiver healthcare task difficulty, caregiver burden, caregiver self-efficacy, activation, technology use, busyness and routine and relationship quality. Caregivers will self-report the nature and intensity of care provided, and their own health status. Associations between caregiver presence and caregiver capacity with patient outcomes will be examined in a series of regression models, and mediating and moderating factors will be tested.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University has approved the study protocol (STU00026255). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the funders of the study as well as patients and caregivers.

Early COVID-19 Attitudes and Behaviors and Their Associations With Later Infection: A Local Perspective From One U.S. City

BACKGROUND

At the onset of the pandemic, there was poor public awareness and inaction in response to COVID-19; it is less known whether this translated to subsequent infections.

OBJECTIVES

To explore whether adults who perceived COVID-19 as less of a threat and who were not taking early actions were more likely to become infected over the following year.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Survey data from the ongoing (COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions (C3) anonymized for review) cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Six hundred forty-two adults with a mean age of 63 and ≥1 chronic condition.

MEASURES

Self-reported attitudes and behaviors regarding COVID-19 were assessed from March 13 to April 3, 2020, and COVID-19 infection status was captured between May 2020 and January 2021. Bivariate and multivariable analyses examined associations between early perceptions and behaviors with later infection.

RESULTS

Approximately 7% reported infection with COVID-19 (N = 46). Adults who perceived the threat of COVID-19 less seriously at the initial outbreak were more likely to test positive over the following year [odds ratio (OR): 0.81, CI: 0.70-0.94; P = 0.006]. Those who were less likely to believe their actions would affect whether they would become infected were more likely to test positive (OR: 0.87, CI: 0.77-0.99; P = 0.03), as were adults who reported not changing their routines (OR: 0.45; CI: 0.24-0.85; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with delayed responses in acknowledging the threat of COVID-19 and in changing behaviors were more likely to contract the virus. This investigation provides insight into the consequences of inadequate public understanding and response to COVID-19, and it highlights the importance of promoting early awareness among high-risk groups during public health crises.

Medication Dosing Schedules, Medication Knowledge, and Dosing Errors of Adults Taking Complex Drug Regimens

This study examined how patients take complex medication regimens at home. Participants were primary care patients, 21 years or older, and prescribed three or more medications. Interviews assessed medication dosing schedules, medication knowledge, and dosing errors. Participants (N=441) were middle aged (mean 56.9); the majority were Hispanic/Latino (73.4%), had limited English proficiency (59.0%), and had limited health literacy (89.0%). One in five participants dosed medication five or more times per day, although no participants in the sample had a label instructing them to take medication more than times times daily. On average, participants correctly identified the purpose of 65% of their medications. Half of participants made one or more dosing errors. Less than high school education and a regimen size of six or more medications were independently associated with less medication knowledge, whereas language discordant label instructions were associated with dosing errors. Screening for regimen dosing complication and interventions to simplify dosing schedules are needed.

Trajectories of Sleep Disturbance and Self-Management of Chronic Conditions during COVID-19 among Middle-aged and Older Adults

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a widespread impact on sleep quality, yet little is known about the prevalence of sleep disturbance and its impact on self-management of chronic conditions during the ongoing pandemic.

Objective

To evaluate trajectories of sleep disturbance, and their associations with one's capacity to self-manage chronic conditions.

Design

A longitudinal cohort study linked to 3 active clinical trials and 2 cohort studies with 5 time points of sleep data collection (July 15, 2020 - May 23, 2022).

Participants

Adults living with chronic conditions who completed sleep questionnaires for two or more time points.

Exposure

Trajectories of self-reported sleep disturbance across 5 time points.

Main Outcomes

3 self-reported measures of self-management capacity, including subjective cognitive decline, medication adherence, and self-efficacy for managing chronic disease.

Results

549 adults aged 23 to 91 years were included in the analysis. Two thirds had 3 or more chronic conditions; 42.4% of participants followed a trajectory of moderate or high likelihood of persistent sleep disturbance across the study period. Moderate or high likelihood of sleep disturbance was associated with older age (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.09, 2.26, P<.05), persistent stress (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16, 2.06, P=.003), poorer physical function (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.17, 2.13, P=.003), greater anxiety (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.04, 1.87, P=.03) and depression (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.20, 2.22, P=.002). Moderate or high likelihood of sleep disturbance was also independently associated with subjective cognitive decline, poorer medication adherence, and worse self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases (all P<.001).

Conclusions

Persistent sleep disturbance during the pandemic may be an important risk factor for inadequate chronic disease self-management and potentially poor health outcomes in adults living with chronic conditions. Public health and health system strategies might consider monitoring sleep quality in adults with chronic conditions to optimize health outcomes.

Association between medication regimen complexity and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and comorbid conditions require patients to take complex medication regimens. Greater regimen complexity has been associated with poorer T2DM management; however, the relationship between overall regimen complexity and glycemic control is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were: (1) to examine associations between regimen complexity (with the Medication Regimen Complexity Index [MRCI]) and glycemic control (A1C), and (2) to compare overall MRCI with other measures of regimen complexity (overall and diabetes-specific medication count) and diabetes-specific MRCI.

METHODS

This was a secondary data analysis of cross-sectional data from a parent trial. Participants were patients with T2DM taking at least 3 chronic medications followed in safety net clinics in the Chicago area. The MRCI measures complexity based on dosing frequency, route of administration, and special instructions for prescribed medications. MRCI scores were created for overall regimens and diabetes-specific medications. Sociodemographics and outpatient visit utilization were included in models as covariates. Linear regression was used to examine the associations between variables of interest and hemoglobin A1C.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 432) had a mean age of 56.9 years, most were female (66.0%), and Hispanic or Latino (73.3%). Regimen complexity was high based on overall medications (mean = 6.6 medications, SD: 3.09) and MRCI (mean = 21.4, SD: 11.3). Higher diabetes-specific MRCI was associated with higher A1C in bivariate and multivariable models. In multivariable models, overall MRCI greater than 14, fewer outpatient health care visits, male gender, and absence of health insurance were independently associated with higher A1C. The variance in A1C explained by MRCI was higher compared to medication count for overall and diabetes-specific regimen complexity.

CONCLUSIONS

More complex regimens are associated with worse A1C and measuring complexity with MRCI may have advantages. Deprescribing, increasing insurance coverage, and promoting engagement in health care may improve A1C among underserved populations with complex regimens.

CAREGIVER HEALTH LITERACY AS A MODIFIABLE TARGET TO PROMOTE OLDER ADULT HEALTH

Many older adults receive assistance in managing chronic conditions. Yet complicating the utility of caregiver support is whether caregivers have sufficient skills to aid in a patient’s self-care. Health literacy (HL) is as an important determinant of older adults’ health outcomes, but few studies have examined caregiver HL and patient outcomes. We interviewed 162 patient-caregiver dyads during an ongoing cognitive aging cohort study to examine associations between caregiver HL, measured using the Newest Vital Sign, and older adults’ health outcomes. Physical function and mental health symptoms were assessed using PROMIS short form assessments. Patients’ also self-reported emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations over the past 12 months. Chi-square and t-tests were performed, as appropriate. Patients were on average 73 years old and managing 4 comorbidities. The majority were female (70%), identified as Black (35%) or White (60%). Caregivers’ mean age was 64 years; half were female (56%) and had limited HL (48%). Limited caregiver HL was associated with poorer physical function (M=43.0 (8.5) vs. M=46.0 (9.1), p=0.05), greater comorbidities (M=4.0 (1.9) vs M=3.3 (1.8), p=0.02) and more ED visits in the past year (36.7% vs. 19.3%, p=0.01). No differences by caregiver HL were observed for patients’ mental health or hospitalization. Findings suggest that caregivers with limited HL are caring for medically complex patients, and further research should examine whether limited caregiver HL leads to poorer self-management of chronic conditions. The development of HL training for caregivers may better equip them to assist older adults and improve older adult health.

Prevalence and risk factors of sleep disturbance in adults with underlying health conditions during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic

To determine the prevalence of sleep disturbance during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among US adults who are more vulnerable to complications because of age and co-morbid conditions, and to identify associated sociodemographic and psychosocial factors. Cross-sectional survey linked to 3 active clinical trials and 2 cohort studies, conducted between 11/30/2020 and 3/3/2021. Five academic internal medicine practices and 2 federally qualified health centers. A total of 715 adults ages 23 to 91 years living with one or more chronic conditions. A fifth (20%) of participants reported poor sleep. Black adults were twice as likely to report poor sleep compared to Whites. Self-reported poor physical function (51%), stress (42%), depression (28%), and anxiety (36%) were also common and all significantly associated with poor sleep. Age ≥70 years and having been vaccinated for COVID-19 were protective against poor sleep. Sex, education, income, alcohol use, and employment status were not significantly associated with sleep quality. In this diverse sample of adults with chronic conditions, by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, disparities in sleep health amid the ongoing pandemic were apparent. Worse physical function and mental health were associated with poor sleep and should be considered targets for health system interventions to prevent the many subsequent consequences of disturbed sleep on health outcomes. Measurements: self-reported sleep quality, physical function, stress, depression, and anxiety.

Aspects of cognition that impact aging-in-place and long-term care planning

BACKGROUND

Older adults frequently defer decisions about their aging-in-place/long-term care (AIP-LTC) needs. As a result, when older adults experience worsening Alzheimer's disease, family members/friends become surrogate decision makers. We sought to understand what aspects of cognition impact older adult AIP-LTC planning.

METHODS

As part of the PlanYourLifespan (PYL)-LitCog study, we longitudinally examined AIP-LTC decision-making among a cohort (LitCog) of community-based older adults (65 years and older) recruited from hospital-associated primary care clinics in Chicago, Illinois, with extensive cognitive testing. PlanYourLifespan.org (PYL) is an evidence-based online intervention that facilitates AIP-LTC planning. Subjects underwent baseline testing, received the PYL online intervention, and then were surveyed at 1, 6, and 12 months about AIP-LTC decision-making. Cross-sectional logistic regression analysis was conducted examining cognitive variables that impacted AIP-LTC decision-making.

RESULTS

Of the 293 older adults interviewed (mean age 73.0 years, 40.4% non-White), subjects were more likely to have made AIP-LTC decisions if they had adequate inductive reasoning (ETS letter sets total-OR = 1.14 (95% CI = 1.03-1.27; p < 0.05)) and adequate working memory (size judgment span total-OR = 1.76 (95% CI = 1.13-2.73; p < 0.05)). There were no differences in decision-making observed in verbal abilities, long-term memory, or processing speed. All analyses were adjusted for participant gender, race, age, and decision-making response at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Inductive reasoning and working memory are critical to AIP-LTC decision-making. Screening routinely for these specific cognitive domains is important in targeting and helping older adults prepare in time for their future AIP-LTC needs.

The Roles of Busyness and Daily Routine in Medication Management Behaviors Among Older Adults

Busyness (the density of activities) and daily routine (patterns of organizing time) are two understudied factors that likely impact medication-taking behaviors. We examined the association between busyness and routine with medication adherence (MA) in 405 older adults with adequate cognition using multivariable models. The final model included an interaction term between daily routine and busyness. MA scores (measured by the ASK-12, higher scores mean more barriers to adherence) were higher for individuals reporting low and moderate levels of daily routine versus those with high daily routine. MA scores were higher for individuals reporting moderate and high busyness versus those reporting low busyness. The busyness/routine interaction term was significant for MA; among highly busy individuals, those with high daily routine had lower MA scores than those with low routine. A daily routine may be a modifiable factor for improving MA among older adults, particularly among those with busy lives.

Prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms and impact on self-management among adults with chronic conditions in Chicago, Illinois, USA, during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES

To examine the prevalence of mental health symptoms during the first surge of COVID-19 in the USA, and their associations with COVID-19-related emotional distress, health self-management and healthcare utilisation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of wave 3 (1-22 May 2020) survey data from the ongoing Chicago COVID-19 Comorbidities (C3) study.

SETTING

Seven academic and community health centres in Chicago, Illinois.

PARTICIPANTS

565 adults aged 23-88 with one or more chronic conditions completing at least one prior C3 study wave.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinically relevant anxiety and depressive symptoms as measured using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short forms. Self-reported emotional and health-related responses to COVID-19 were measured through a combination of single-item questions and validated measures.

RESULTS

Rates of anxiety and depressive symptoms were 14% (81/563) and 15% (84/563), respectively. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were then each separately associated with greater worry about contracting COVID-19 (relative risk (RR) 2.32, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.53; RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.54), greater stress (RR 4.93, 95% CI 3.20 to 7.59; RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.96 to 4.61) and loneliness (RR 3.82, 95% CI 2.21 to 6.60; RR 5.37, 95% CI 3.21 to 8.98), greater avoidance of the doctor (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.49; RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.36) and difficulty managing health (least square means (LS Means) 6.09, 95% CI 5.25 to 6.92 vs 4.23, 95% CI 3.70 to 4.75; LS Means 5.85, 95% CI 5.04 to 6.65 vs 4.22, 95% CI 3.70 to 4.75) and medications (LS Means 3.71, 95% CI 2.98 to 4.43 vs 2.47, 95% CI 2.02 to 2.92) due to the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying and addressing mental health concerns may be an important factor to consider in COVID-19 prevention and management among high-risk medical populations.

Characteristics of Older Adults who Receive Assistance with Management of Multidrug Regimens

Many older adults manage multiple chronic conditions requiring adherence to multidrug regimens, yet half are non-adherent, increasing their risk of hospitalization for poorly controlled chronic conditions. Few studies have investigated whether caregivers support medication-related behaviors of community-dwelling older adults. We interviewed 97 patient-caregiver dyads participating in a cognitive aging cohort study to identify factors associated with caregiver assistance in managing multidrug regimens. Patients completed a neuropsychological battery covering five cognitive domains. Health literacy and patient activation were measured using the Newest Vital Sign and Consumer Health Activation Index, respectively. Caregivers reported their medication-related involvement. Predictors of involvement in medication-related tasks were examined using logistic regression models. Patients were on average 71 years old, managing 4 comorbidities and prescribed 5 medications. The majority were female (73%) and identified as Black (46%) or White (47%). Caregivers’ mean age was 65 years; half were female (53%), were predominantly spouses (57%) or children (26%), and lived with the patient (61%). 31% of caregivers ordered patients’ prescribed medications, 40% helped manage their medications, and 50% spoke with the patient’s clinician about their clinical care. Cognitive impairment (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.08-6.25), limited health literacy (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.26-6.97), and ≥3 comorbidities (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.06-9.30) were associated with medication management assistance. Patient activation, gender, cohabitation, or relationship were not associated. These findings suggest that caregivers are assisting with older adults’ medication management and should be included in clinical discussions about medication management, especially among patients with cognitive impairment, low health literacy or multimorbidities.

Increased Self-Efficacy among Older Adults Aging-in-Place during COVID-19

Self-efficacy is defined as a person's belief in their capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments. It also reflects confidence in the ability to exert control over motivation, behavior, and environment. During the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults were stressed with forced isolation, concerns over mortality, and finding alternate means of fulfilling their home-based needs. We sought to assess how COVID-19 pandemic affected the self-efficacy of a cohort of older adults aging-in-place. The LITCOG cohort is a group of community-dwelling older adults (65 years and older) who have had longitudinally assessment of cognition, health literacy, and functional skills over the past 15 years. As part of a larger study of the LITCOG cohort assessing decision making for aging-in-place, we assessed self-efficacy using validated PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) measures with older adults prior to COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Survey results were obtained from 214 subjects (n=66 pre-COVID and n=148 during COVID). Nearly half of the sample (48.2%) had either marginal (25.5%) or low health literacy (22.7%). PROMIS General Self Efficacy was higher among those assessed during the COVID-19 pandemic (45.8 (7.7) pre-COVID vs 43.7 (8.0), p=0.07). PROMIS Self Efficacy for managing social interactions was higher during the COVID pandemic (45.0 (6.1) pre-COVID-19 vs. 48.7 (8.3) during COVID-19, p=0.02). During the stress and social isolation of the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults exhibited increased levels of self-efficacy. Ongoing longitudinal follow-up will determine how this self-efficacy evolves after the COVID-19 pandemic and impacts the ability to age-in-place.

Caregiver involvement in managing medications among older adults with multiple chronic conditions

OBJECTIVE

We sought to characterize caregiver medication assistance for older adults with multiple chronic conditions.

DESIGN

Semi-structured qualitative interviews.

SETTING

Community and academic-affiliated primary care practices.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 25 caregivers to older adults participating in an ongoing cohort study with ≥3 chronic conditions.

MEASUREMENTS

A semi-structured interview guide, informed by the Medication Self-Management model, aimed to understand health-related and medication-specific assistance caregivers provided.

RESULTS

Three typologies of caregiver assistance with medications emerged: Actively Involved, Peripherally Involved, and Not Involved. A total of 10 caregivers were Actively Involved, which was defined as when the caregiver perceived a need for and offered assistance, and the patient accepted the assistance. Peripherally Involved (n = 6) was defined as when the caregiver perceived a need and offered assistance; however, the patient rejected this assistance, yet relied on the caregiver as a backup in managing his or her medications. To combat resistance from the patient, caregivers in this typology disguised assistance and deployed workaround strategies to monitor medication-taking behaviors to ensure safety. Lastly, nine caregivers were classified as Not Involved, defined as when the caregiver did not perceive a need to offer assistance with medications, and the patient managed his or her medicines independently. A strong preference toward autonomy in medication management was shared across all three typologies.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that caregivers value independent medication management by their care recipient, up until safety is seriously questioned. Clinicians should not assume caregivers are actively and consistently involved in older adults' medication management; instead, they should initiate conversations with patients and caregivers to better understand and facilitate co-management responsibilities, especially among those whose assistance is rejected by older adults.

Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine trust and hesitancy among adults with chronic conditions

In a survey of older adults at higher risk for COVID-19 complications, we sought to describe expectations of trust in the safety and efficacy of a future COVID-19 vaccine, and level of hesitancy about receiving it. We also assessed whether these expectations were associated with known or suspected contributors to vaccine hesitancy, disparities in vaccine receipt, and potential targets for public health outreach.

From May 1–22, 2020, we performed telephone surveys of 601 older adults with chronic conditions in metro Chicago about their COVID-19 experiences and levels of vaccine trust and hesitancy. All participants previously completed assessments of demographics, health status, health literacy and activation. Bivariate associations were performed using t-tests or one-way ANOVA, and multivariate analyses using least square means.

Younger age (<60), Black race, greater complacency about contracting COVID-19, and lower confidence in state or local government were associated with significantly lower trust in a vaccine’s safety and efficacy. Black race and greater complacency about contracting COVID-19 were associated with a significantly greater vaccine hesitancy. Amongst Black participants, vaccine hesitancy varied significantly by confidence in the federal government.

Trust and hesitancy regarding a future COVID-19 vaccine were associated with age, race, complacency regarding contracting COVID-19, and confidence in government response to the pandemic, but not education, health literacy or activation. Therefore, efforts to vaccinate higher risk older adults must aim not only to educate and provide vaccine access, but engender trust in the vaccine development process and vaccination strategies at both the federal and the local level.

Perceived Adequacy of Tangible Support during Stay-at-Home Orders in Chicago and New York

Objectives:

Physical distancing precautions during the COVID-19 pandemic may challenge the provision of tangible support many middle age and older adults receive in managing their health. We examined the association between unmet tangible support needs and self-management behaviors and mental health status during the stay-at-home orders in Chicago and New York.

Methods:

We used data from the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions study collected between May 1st and May 22nd, 2020. A total of 801 middle age and older adults with ≥1 chronic condition in Chicago and New York City completed the telephone interview. Adequacy of tangible social support was measured using a brief, validated scale that determined whether an individual needed assistance managing his or her health, and if yes, whether this need was met. Participants reported their level of difficulty engaging in self-management behaviors using 2 discrete items; they also self-reported medication adherence using the ASK-12 medication adherence scale. Mental health status was measured using the depression and anxiety PROMIS short-form instruments.

Results:

Participants’ mean age was 63 years; 30% identified as Black, 26% identified as Latino, and 12% identified unmet support needs. Inadequacy of tangible support was associated with greater difficulty managing one’s health and accessing medications due to COVID-19, as well as poorer medication adherence, increased anxiety and depressive symptoms, and poorer overall well-being (P’s < .05).

Conclusions:

Perceived unmet support needs during stay-at-home orders were associated with greater difficulty engaging in self-management behaviors and poorer overall well-being. Two brief items quickly identified individuals with unmet support needs.

Change in Health Literacy over a Decade in a Prospective Cohort of Community-Dwelling Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Health literacy is often viewed as a static trait in longitudinal studies, which may over or underestimate an individual's ability to manage one's health.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine health literacy over time among older adults using three widely used measures.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling adults ages 55 to 74 at baseline with at least one follow-up visit (N = 656) recruited from one academic internal medicine clinic and six community health centers in Chicago, IL.

MEASURES

Health literacy was measured using the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA), Newest Vital Sign (NVS), and Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) at baseline and up to three follow-up time points.

RESULTS

In unadjusted analyses, significant changes since baseline were found beginning at the second follow-up (mean (M) = 6.0 years, SD = 0.6) for the TOFHLA (M = - 0.9, SD = 0.95, p = 0.049) and the REALM (M = 0.3, SD = 2.5, p = 0.004) and at the last follow-up (M = 8.6 years, SD = 0.5) for the NVS (M = - 0.2, SD = 1.4, p = 0.02). There were non-linear effects of baseline age on TOFHLA and NVS scores over time (piecewise cubic spline p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) and no effect on REALM scores (B = 0.02, 95% CI - 0.01 to 0.04, p = 0.17) using multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models, controlling for race, education, income, and comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

We found a negative relationship between age and health literacy over time as measured by the TOFHLA and NVS. Health literacy barriers appear to be more prevalent among individuals in later life, when self-care demands are similarly increasing. Clinicians might consider strategies to assess and respond to limited health literacy, particularly among patients 70 and older. REALM performance remained stable over 10 years of follow-up. This questions whether health literacy tools measure the same attribute. Prospective health literacy studies should carefully consider what measures to use, depending on their objective.

Rationale and study design for decision making & implementation of aging-in-place/long term care plans among older adults

Background

Remaining in one's own home and community is a priority for many older adults as they age. Decision-making and planning is critical to ensure successful aging-in-place (AIP), especially when individuals experience age-related changes such as cognitive decline. Objectives: We are testing how decision-making and planning for AIP is impacted by changes in older adults' cognition and function, chronic conditions, social influences, environmental factors and identifying the mediating/moderating interactions between factors. We will also assess whether decision-making and planning for AIP translates into timely adoption of plans and goal concordance between older adults and their surrogate/caregiver decision makers.

Methods

We will conduct a longitudinal single-group interventional clinical trial of community-dwelling older adults who are enrolled in LitCog, (R01AG03611) and expose them to an online intervention, PlanYourLifespan.org, which facilitates decision-making and planning for AIP. Enrolled participants (n = 398) will complete interviews at baseline, one month, and every six months up to 42 months in conjunction with the LitCog study, where cognitive, social, functional, and health literacy data is collected. Additionally, we will collect data on decision-making, resource use, communication of plans, timing of plan implementation, and goal concordance.

Projected outcomes

Findings from this study may generate evidence on how age-related changes in older adults may affect decision-making and implementation in relation to AIP as well as the impact of social relationships and support. Ultimately these findings may help shape the design of programs and practices that may improve the lives of older adults and the capacity of institutions to adapt to societal aging and AIP.

Medication Management Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: What Role Do Caregivers Play?

Many older adults manage multiple chronic conditions (MCC) that require adherence to complex medication regimens. Few studies have investigated the degree to which caregivers support medication-related behaviors. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 caregivers of older adults with MCC to characterize caregiver medication assistance. Two coders used content and constant comparative analysis to analyze transcripts. The mean age of caregivers was 61 years; the majority were female (68%) and identified as non-white (Black, 52%; Hispanic, 8%). Caregivers were predominantly spouses (n=10), or children (n=11). Older adults were on average 73 years old, managing 5 chronic conditions and prescribed 7 medications. Caregivers acknowledged the importance of medications to the older adult’s health, but their involvement in daily medication management was limited. Some caregivers preferred that the older adult continue these tasks to maintain autonomy, especially when caring for older adults who valued maintaining independence. Caregivers assumed medication responsibilities after older adults experienced sudden changes in health or upon observing non-adherence (e.g. full pill bottles). Older adults with higher medication burden (12+ medicines) adopted inefficient, cumbersome medication management practices; caregivers suggested simplified strategies, but the older adults refused to adopt recommended strategies. To combat resistance from the older adult, caregivers disguised assistance and deployed workaround strategies to monitor medication-taking behaviors. These findings suggest older adults and caregivers share a value of promoting independence of medication management, up until safety is seriously questioned. Additionally, there is a breakdown in communication at the time when older adults may benefit from increased caregiver involvement.

Preliminary Results of MyCog, a Brief Assessment for the Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care

Early detection of Cognitive impairment (CI) is imperative to identify potentially treatable underlying conditions or provide supportive services when due to progressive conditions such as Alzheimer’s Disease. While primary care settings are ideal for identifying CI, it frequently goes undetected. We developed ‘MyCog’, a brief technology-enabled, 2-step assessment to detect CI and dementia in primary care settings. We piloted MyCog in 80 participants 65 and older recruited from an ongoing cognitive aging study. Cases were identified either by a documented diagnosis of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or based on a comprehensive cognitive battery. Administered via an iPad, Step 1 consists of a single self-report item indicating concern about memory or other thinking problems and Step 2 includes two cognitive assessments from the NIH Toolbox: Picture Sequence Memory (PSM) and Dimensional Change Card Sorting (DCCS). 39%(31/80) participants were considered cognitively impaired. Those who expressed concern in Step 1 (n=52, 66%) resulted in a 37% false positive and 3% false negative rate. With the addition of the PSM and DCCS assessments in Step 2, the paradigm demonstrated 91% sensitivity, 75% specificity and an area under the ROC curve (AUC)=0.82. Steps 1 and 2 had an average administration time of <7 minutes. We continue to optimize MyCog by 1) examining additional items for Step 1 to reduce the false positive rate and 2) creating a self-administered version to optimize use in clinical settings. With further validation, MyCog offers a practical, scalable paradigm for the routine detection of cognitive impairment and dementia.

eHealth literacy and web-based patient portal usage among kidney and liver transplant recipients

Patient portals promote self-management, but require skills with electronic health information which can be measured by a patient's eHealth literacy. We aimed to describe eHealth literacy among a population of kidney transplant (KT) and liver transplant (LT) recipients and to investigate the relationship between eHealth literacy and Web-based patient portal utilization. We conducted phone surveys (August 2016-March 2017) among 178 KT and 110 LT recipients at two large transplant centers, including the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) and items assessing routine portal usage. Portal users were defined as routine if usage was every day, weekly, or monthly. The mean eHEALS score was 30.9 (SD: 5.4), and 45.4% routinely used the patient portal more than a few times per month. Routine users had higher eHealth literacy than non-routine users and non-users (31.97 vs. 29.97 vs. 28.20, p < .001). Routine users had higher eHealth literacy scores compared with non-users after adjusting for transplant organ type, age, educational level, employment status, mobile Internet access, and transplant center (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.17). KT and LT recipients who routinely use patient portals have high eHealth literacy compared with other diseased populations, which should be leveraged by encouraging routine usage to improve post-transplant health and medication adherence.

Awareness, Attitudes, and Actions Related to COVID-19 Among Adults With Chronic Conditions at the Onset of the U.S. Outbreak: A Cross-sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

The evolving outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is requiring social distancing and other measures to protect public health. However, messaging has been inconsistent and unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine COVID-19 awareness, knowledge, attitudes, and related behaviors among U.S. adults who are more vulnerable to complications of infection because of age and comorbid conditions.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey linked to 3 active clinical trials and 1 cohort study.

SETTING

5 academic internal medicine practices and 2 federally qualified health centers.

PATIENTS

630 adults aged 23 to 88 years living with 1 or more chronic conditions.

MEASUREMENTS

Self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to COVID-19.

RESULTS

A fourth (24.6%) of participants were "very worried" about getting the coronavirus. Nearly a third could not correctly identify symptoms (28.3%) or ways to prevent infection (30.2%). One in 4 adults (24.6%) believed that they were "not at all likely" to get the virus, and 21.9% reported that COVID-19 had little or no effect on their daily routine. One in 10 respondents was very confident that the federal government could prevent a nationwide outbreak. In multivariable analyses, participants who were black, were living below the poverty level, and had low health literacy were more likely to be less worried about COVID-19, to not believe that they would become infected, and to feel less prepared for an outbreak. Those with low health literacy had greater confidence in the federal government response.

LIMITATION

Cross-sectional study of adults with underlying health conditions in 1 city during the initial week of the COVID-19 U.S. outbreak.

CONCLUSION

Many adults with comorbid conditions lacked critical knowledge about COVID-19 and, despite concern, were not changing routines or plans. Noted disparities suggest that greater public health efforts may be needed to mobilize the most vulnerable communities.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

Rationale and design of the regimen education and messaging in diabetes (REMinD) trial

BACKGROUND

Individuals with type 2 diabetes manage complex multi-drug regimens, but nearly half of all patients do not consistently take the dose prescribed for them, and therefore may not receive the full potential therapeutic benefit. Both patient and health system factors contribute to achieving and maintaining medication adherence. To determine if patients with type 2 diabetes who are concurrently managing other chronic conditions could improve their adherence, we devised and are testing a multifaceted, primary care-based strategy to provide health literacy-appropriate and language concordant regimen information, guidance and reminders.

OBJECTIVE

We are testing the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR) based strategy and short message service (SMS) text reminders to help patients with type 2 diabetes adhere to their medications.

METHODS

We are conducting a 3-arm, multi-site trial to test and compare the effectiveness of the EHR, and EHR + SMS text reminder strategies compared to usual care on medication adherence. Our goal is to enroll a total of 900 English or Spanish-speaking patients with type 2 diabetes and hemoglobin A1C value ≥7.5%. Enrolled participants will complete interviews at baseline and 3 and 6 months following their baseline interview.

CONCLUSIONS

Our trial is evaluating practical, clinic-based, scalable, evidence-based solutions for patients with type 2 diabetes managing complex medication regimens. Our findings will evaluate strategies that can be implemented broadly in primary care practices, and programmed as defaults within EHRs to support appropriate medication adherence to allow the widespread implementation of those strategies.