Protecting Caribbean patients diagnosed with cancer from compounding disasters

Caribbean small island developing states are becoming increasingly vulnerable to compounding disasters, prominently featuring climate-related hazards and pandemic diseases, which exacerbate existing barriers to cancer control in the region. We describe the complexities of cancer prevention and control efforts throughout the Caribbean small island developing states, including the unique challenges of people diagnosed with cancer in the region. We highlight potential solutions and strategies that concurrently address disaster adaptation and cancer control. Because Caribbean small island developing states are affected first and worst by the hazards of compounding disasters, the innovative solutions developed in the region are relevant for climate mitigation, disaster adaptation, and cancer control efforts globally. In the age of complex and cascading disaster scenarios, developing strategies to mitigate their effect on the cancer control continuum, and protecting the health and safety of people diagnosed with cancer from extreme events become increasingly urgent. The equitable development of such strategies relies on collaborative efforts among professionals whose diverse expertise from complementary fields infuses the local community perspective while focusing on implementing solutions.

Racial Disparities in Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the United States

PURPOSE

Young individuals racialized as Black are more likely to die after a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis than individuals racialized as White in the United States. This study examined racial disparities in receipt of timely and guideline-concordant care among individuals racialized as Black and White with early-onset CRC.

METHODS

Individuals age 18-49 years racialized as non-Hispanic Black and White (self-identified) and newly diagnosed with CRC during 2004-2019 were selected from the National Cancer Database. Patients who received recommended care (staging, surgery, lymph node evaluation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) were considered to have received guideline-concordant care. Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age and sex. The decomposition method was used to estimate the relative contribution of demographic characteristics (age and sex), comorbidities, health insurance, and facility type to the racial disparity in receipt of guideline-concordant care. The product-limit method was used to evaluate differences in time to treatment between patients racialized as Black and White.

RESULTS

Of the 84,882 patients with colon cancer and 62,573 patients with rectal cancer, 20.8% and 14.5% were racialized as Black, respectively. Individuals racialized as Black were more likely to not receive guideline-concordant care for colon (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.14 to 1.22]) and rectal (aOR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.33]) cancers. Health insurance explained 28.2% and 21.6% of the disparity among patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. Individuals racialized as Black had increased time to adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.24 to 1.32]) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.37 to 1.47]) compared with individuals racialized as White.

CONCLUSION

Patients with early-onset CRC racialized as Black receive worse and less timely care than individuals racialized as White. Health insurance, a modifiable factor, was the largest contributor to racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care in this study.

Changes in cancer incidence rates by stage during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to health care disruptions and declines in cancer diagnoses in the United States. However, the impact of the pandemic on cancer incidence rates by stage at diagnosis and race and ethnicity is unknown. This cross-sectional study calculated delay- and age-adjusted incidence rates, stratified by stage at diagnosis and race and ethnicity, and rate ratios (RRs) comparing changes in year-over-year incidence rates (eg, 2020 vs 2019) from 2016 to 2020 for 22 cancer types based on data obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 22-registry database. From 2019 to 2020, the incidence of local-stage disease statistically significantly declined for 19 of the 22 cancer types, ranging from 4% (RR = 0.96; 95%CI, 0.93-0.98) for urinary bladder cancer to 18% for colorectal (RR = 0.82; 95%CI, 0.81-0.84) and laryngeal (RR = 0.82; 95%CI, 0.78-0.88) cancers, deviating from pre-COVID stable year-over-year changes. Incidence during the corresponding period also declined for 16 cancer types for regional-stage and six cancer types for distant-stage disease. By race and ethnicity, the decline in local-stage incidence for screening-detectable cancers was generally greater in historically marginalized populations. The decline in cancer incidence rates during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic occurred mainly for local- and regional-stage diseases across racial and ethnic groups. Whether these declines will lead to increases in advanced-stage disease and mortality rates remain to be investigated with additional data years. Nevertheless, the findings reinforce the importance of strengthening the return to preventive care campaigns and outreach for detecting cancers at early and more treatable stages.

Effects of Wildfire Events on California Radiation Oncology Clinics and Patients

Purpose

The effect of climate-driven events, such as wildfires, on health care delivery and cancer care is a growing concern. Patients with cancer undergoing radiation therapy are particularly vulnerable to treatment interruptions, which have a direct effect on survival. We report the results of a study characterizing the effect of wildfires on radiation oncology clinics and their patients.

Methods and Materials

A survey of California radiation oncologists was used to evaluate emergency preparedness and the effect of wildfires on the delivery of radiation therapy services between 2017 and 2022. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's χ2 tests were performed to investigate potential relationships between provider characteristics, practice settings, and perceptions of the effect of wildfire events. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection data were employed to map the geographic distribution of wildfires to clinic locations.

Results

Response rate was 12.3% (51/415 radiation oncologists), representing 25% of clinics (43/176) in 41% (24/58) of California counties. Sixty-one percent (31/51) of respondents reported being affected by a wildfire, 2 of which are rural clinics (100%, 2/2) and 29 are (59%, 29/49) metropolitan practices. Of these, 18% (9/51) reported a clinic closure, and 29% (15/51) reported staffing shortages. Respondents reported effects on patients, including having to evacuate (55%, 28/51), cancel/reschedule treatments (53%, 27/51), and experiencing physical, mental, or financial hardship due to wildfires (45%, 23/51). Respondents described effects on clinical operations, including being forced to transfer patients (24%, 12/51), transportation interruptions (37%, 19/51), regional/community evacuations (35%, 18/51), and physical/mental health effects (27%, 14/51) on clinic personnel. Less than half of the respondents (47%, 24/51) reported their workplace had a wildfire emergency preparedness plan. Additionally, geographic analysis revealed that 100% (176/176) of clinics were located within 25 miles of a wildfire.

Conclusions

This study highlights the effects of wildfires on radiation oncology clinics and patients and underscores the need for emergency preparedness planning to minimize the consequences of such disasters.

Association of Historical Housing Discrimination and Colon Cancer Treatment and Outcomes in the United States

PURPOSE

In the 1930s, the federally sponsored Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) used racial composition in its assessment of areas worthy of receiving loans. Neighborhoods with large proportions of Black residents were mapped in red (ie, redlining) and flagged as hazardous for mortgage financing. Redlining created a platform for systemic disinvestment in these neighborhoods, leading to barriers in access to resources that persist today. We investigated the association between residing in areas with different HOLC ratings and receipt of quality cancer care and outcomes among individuals diagnosed with colon cancer-a leading cause of cancer deaths amenable to early detection and treatment.

METHODS

Individuals who resided in zip code tabulation areas in 196 cities with HOLC rating and were diagnosed with colon cancer from 2007 to 2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database and assigned a HOLC grade (A, best; B, still desirable; C, definitely declining; and D, hazardous and mapped in red). Multivariable logistic regression models investigated association of area-level HOLC grade and late stage at diagnosis and receipt of guideline-concordant care. The product-limit method evaluated differences in time to adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models investigated differences in overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

There were 149,917 patients newly diagnosed with colon cancer with a median age of 68 years. Compared with people living in HOLC A areas, people living in HOLC D areas were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease (adjusted odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.12]). In addition, people living in HOLC B, C, and D areas had 8%, 16%, and 24% higher odds of not receiving guideline-concordant care, including lower receipt of surgery, evaluation of ≥12 lymph nodes, and chemotherapy. People residing in HOLC B, C, or D areas also experienced delays in initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. People residing in HOLC C (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.13]) and D (aHR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.18]) areas had worse OS, including 13% and 20% excess risk of death for individuals diagnosed with early- and 6% and 8% for late-stage disease for HOLC C and D, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Historical housing discrimination is associated with worse contemporary access to colon cancer care and outcomes.

Incarceration History and Access to and Receipt of Health Care in the US

Importance

People with a history of incarceration may experience barriers in access to and receipt of health care in the US.

Objective

To examine the associations of incarceration history and access to and receipt of care and the contribution of modifiable factors (educational attainment and health insurance coverage) to these associations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Individuals with and without incarceration history were identified from the 2008 to 2018 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 cohort. Analyses were conducted from October 2022 to December 2023.

Main Measures and Outcomes

Access to and receipt of health care were measured as self-reported having usual source of care and preventive service use, including physical examination, influenza shot, blood pressure check, blood cholesterol level check, blood glucose level check, dental check, and colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings across multiple panels. To account for the longitudinal study design, we used the inverse probability weighting method with generalized estimating equations to evaluate associations of incarceration history and access to care. Separate multivariable models examining associations between incarceration history and receipt of each preventive service adjusted for sociodemographic factors; sequential models further adjusted for educational attainment and health insurance coverage to examine their contribution to the associations of incarceration history and access to and receipt of health care.

Results

A total of 7963 adults with 41 614 person-years of observation were included in this study; of these, 586 individuals (5.4%) had been incarcerated, with 2800 person-years of observation (4.9%). Compared with people without incarceration history, people with incarceration history had lower percentages of having a usual source of care or receiving preventive services, including physical examinations (69.6% vs 74.1%), blood pressure test (85.6% vs 91.6%), blood cholesterol level test (59.5% vs 72.2%), blood glucose level test (61.4% vs 69.4%), dental check up (51.1% vs 66.0%), and breast (55.0% vs 68.2%) and colorectal cancer screening (65.6% vs 70.3%). With additional adjustment for educational attainment and health insurance, the associations of incarceration history and access to care were attenuated for most measures and remained statistically significant for measures of having a usual source of care, blood cholesterol level test, and dental check up only.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this survey study suggest that incarceration history was associated with worse access to and receipt of health care. Educational attainment and health insurance may contribute to these associations. Efforts to improve access to education and health insurance coverage for people with an incarceration history might mitigate disparities in care.

Climate change and cancer: the Environmental Justice perspective

Despite advances in cancer control-prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship-racial disparities in cancer incidence and survival persist and, in some cases, are widening in the United States. Since 2020, there's been growing recognition of the role of structural racism, including structurally racist policies and practices, as the main factor contributing to historical and contemporary disparities. Structurally racist policies and practices have been present since the genesis of the United States and are also at the root of environmental injustices, which result in disproportionately high exposure to environmental hazards among communities targeted for marginalization, increased cancer risk, disruptions in access to care, and worsening health outcomes. In addition to widening cancer disparities, environmental injustices enable the development of polluting infrastructure, which contribute to detrimental health outcomes in the entire population, and to climate change, the most pressing public health challenge of our time. In this commentary, we describe the connections between climate change and cancer through an Environmental Justice perspective (defined as the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of people of all racialized groups, nationalities, or income, in all aspects, including development, implementation, and enforcement, of policies and practices that affect the environment and public health), highlighting how the expertise developed in communities targeted for marginalization is crucial for addressing health disparities, tackling climate change, and advancing cancer control efforts for the entire population.

Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Early Mortality Following Lung Cancer Surgery

Importance

Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is associated with gains in health insurance coverage, earlier stage diagnosis, and improved survival among patients with cancer.

Objective

To examine the association of Medicaid expansion with changes in early mortality among adults undergoing surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a setting in which access to care is a major determinant of survival.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used the National Cancer Database to identify 14 984 adults 45 to 64 years of age who underwent surgical resection of NSCLC between 2008 and 2019. Analysis was conducted between March 28, 2021, and September 1, 2023.

Exposure

State of residence Medicaid expansion status.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Descriptive statistics were used to compare study population characteristics by Medicaid expansion status of patients' state of residence. Difference-in-differences analyses were used to evaluate the association between Medicaid expansion and postoperative mortality before implementation of the ACA (2008-2013) vs after (2014-2019).

Results

Among 14 984 adults included, the mean (SD) age was 56.3 (5.1) years, 54.6% were women, and 62.1% lived in Medicaid expansion states. Both 30-day (from 0.97% to 0.26%) and 90-day (from 2.63% to 1.32%) postoperative mortality decreased from before the ACA to after among patients residing in Medicaid expansion states (both P < .001) but not in nonexpansion states (30-day mortality before the ACA, 0.75% vs after the ACA, 0.68%; P = .74; and 90-day mortality before the ACA, 2.43% vs after the ACA, 2.20%; P = .57), leading to a difference-in-differences of -0.64 percentage points (95% CI, -1.19 to -0.08; P = .03) for 30-day mortality and -1.08 percentage points (95% CI, -2.08 to -0.08; P = .03) for 90-day mortality. The difference-in-differences for in-hospital mortality was not significant (P = .34) between expansion states (1.41% before the ACA to 0.77% after the ACA; 0.63 percentage point decrease; P = .004) and nonexpansion states (1.49% before the ACA to 1.20% after the ACA; 0.30 percentage point decrease; P = .29).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with NSCLC, Medicaid expansion was associated with declines in 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality following hospital discharge. These findings suggest that Medicaid expansion may be an effective strategy for improving access to care and cancer outcomes in this population.

Derailing Carcinogens-Oncologists and the Ohio Train Derailment

This Viewpoint discusses how oncologists can support environmental strategies to reduce dependence on petrochemicals, which are associated with cancer risk.

Assessment of Changes in Cancer Treatment During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US

Importance

The COVID-19 pandemic led to disruptions in access to health care, including cancer care. The extent of changes in receipt of cancer treatment is unclear.

Objective

To evaluate changes in the absolute number, proportion, and cancer treatment modalities provided to patients with newly diagnosed cancer during 2020, the first year of the pandemic.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with any solid tumor between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were identified using the National Cancer Database. Data analysis was conducted from September 19, 2022, to July 28, 2023.

Exposure

First year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The expected number of procedures for each treatment modality (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and hormonal therapy) in 2020 were calculated using historical data (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019) with the vector autoregressive method. The difference between expected and observed numbers was evaluated using a generalized estimating equation under assumptions of the Poisson distribution for count data. Changes in the proportion of different types of cancer treatments initiated in 2020 were evaluated using the additive outlier method.

Results

A total of 3 504 342 patients (1 214 918 in 2018, mean [SD] age, 64.6 [13.6] years; 1 235 584 in 2019, mean [SD] age, 64.8 [13.6] years; and 1 053 840 in 2020, mean [SD] age, 64.9 [13.6] years) were included. Compared with expected treatment from previous years' trends, there were approximately 98 000 fewer curative intent surgical procedures performed, 38 800 fewer chemotherapy regimens, 55 500 fewer radiotherapy regimens, 6800 fewer immunotherapy regimens, and 32 000 fewer hormonal therapies initiated in 2020. For most cancer sites and stages evaluated, there was no statistically significant change in the type of cancer treatment provided during the first year of the pandemic, the exception being a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy with a simultaneous statistically significant increase in the proportion of patients undergoing mastectomy for treatment of stage I breast cancer during the first months of the pandemic.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this large national cohort study, a significant deficit was noted in the number of cancer treatments provided in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data indicated that this deficit in the number of cancer treatments provided was associated with decreases in the number of cancer diagnoses, not changes in treatment strategies.

The Intersectionality of Climate Change and Post-Stroke Aphasia

Persons with communication disabilities including persons with post-stroke aphasia (PWAs) possess a vulnerability to climate change as a result of their communication impairments. The disproportionate effects of climate change are likely to exacerbate preexisting inequities in social determinants of health. Communication disability intersecting with other characteristics subject to discrimination (e.g., race, age, sex, income) may lead to inequities in climate-related adaptive capacity. This article echoes earlier concerns related to climate change and further educates healthcare professionals about the impact of climate change on the global human population, with particular consideration of PWAs. The aims of this article are the following: (1) to broaden the understanding of aphasiologists and clinicians caring for PWAs about climate change and the contributions of human activity (anthropogenic) to this crisis; (2) to describe climate change and its impact on health; (3) to detail the intersectionality of climate and health; (4) to explore climate change and its potential effects on PWAs; and (5) to offer hope through emissions reduction, adaptation, resilience, and immediate change.

Protecting vulnerable patient populations from climate hazards: the role of the nation's cancer centers

Individuals diagnosed with cancer are a vulnerable population during disasters. Emergency preparedness efforts are crucial for meeting the health and safety needs of patients, health-care professionals, health-care facilities, and communities before, during, and after a disaster. Recognizing the importance of advancing emergency preparedness expertise to cancer control efforts nationwide, especially in the era of climate change, we searched National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers' websites to examine emergency preparedness information sharing and evidence of research efforts focused on disaster preparedness. Of 71 centers, 56 (78.9%) presented some emergency preparedness information, and 36 (50.7%) presented information specific to individuals diagnosed with cancer. Only 17 (23.9%) centers provided emergency preparedness information for climate-driven disasters. Informed by these data, this commentary describes an opportunity for cancer centers to lead knowledge advancement on an important aspect of climate change adaptation: disaster preparedness.

Association of Wildfire Exposure While Recovering From Lung Cancer Surgery With Overall Survival

Importance

With a changing climate, wildfire activity in the US has increased dramatically, presenting multifaceted and compounding health hazards. Individuals discharged from the hospital following surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are potentially at higher risk from wildfires' health hazards.

Objective

To assess the association between wildfire exposure and postoperative long-term overall survival among patients with lung cancer in the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, individuals who underwent curative-intent NSCLC resection between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019, were selected from the National Cancer Database. Daily wildfire information was aggregated at the zip code level from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Fire Information for Resource Management System. The data analysis was performed between July 19, 2022, and April 14, 2023.

Exposure

An active wildfire detected at the zip code of residence between 0 and 3, 4 and 6, or 7 and 12 months after NSCLC surgery.

Main Outcome

Overall survival was defined as the interval between age at hospital discharge and age at death, last contact, or study end, whichever came first. Cox proportional hazards were used for estimating hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for sex, region, metropolitan category, health insurance type, comorbidities, tumor size, lymph node involvement, era, and facility type.

Results

A total of 466 912 individuals included in the study (249 303 female and [53.4] and 217 609 male [46.6%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67.3 [9.9] years), with 48 582 (10.4%) first exposed to a wildfire between 0 and 3 months, 48 328 (10.6%) between 4 and 6 months, and 71 735 (15.3%) between 7 and 12 months following NSCLC surgery. Individuals exposed to a wildfire within 3 months (adjusted HR [AHR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.41-1.45), between 4 and 6 months (AHR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.37-1.41), and between 7 and 12 months (AHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15-1.19) after discharge from the hospital following stage I to III NSCLC resection had worse overall survival than unexposed individuals.

Conclusions

In this cohort study, wildfire exposure was associated with worse overall survival following NSCLC surgical resection, suggesting that patients with lung cancer are at greater risk from the health hazards of wildfires and need to be prioritized in climate adaptation efforts.

Climate Change and Cancer

Climate change, the greatest threat to human health of our time, has implications for cancer control efforts throughout the cancer care continuum. The direct and indirect impacts of climate change on cancer risk, access to care, and outcomes are numerous and compounding, yet many oncology professionals might not be familiar with the strong connection between climate change and cancer. Thus, to increase awareness of this topic among cancer researchers, practitioners, and other professionals, this commentary discusses the links between climate change and cancer prevention and control, provides examples of adaptation and mitigation efforts, and describes opportunities and resources for future research. See related article by xxxx, p. xxxx.

Disruption of National Cancer Database Data Models in the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Importance

Each year, the National Cancer Database (NCDB) collects and analyzes data used in reports to support research, quality measures, and Commission on Cancer program accreditation. Because data models used to generate these reports have been historically stable, year-to-year variances have been attributed to changes within the cancer program rather than data modeling. Cancer submissions in 2020 were anticipated to be significantly different from prior years because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study involved a validation analysis of the variances in observed to expected 2020 NCDB cancer data in comparison with 2019 and 2018.

Observations

The NCDB captured a total of 1 223 221 overall cancer cases in 2020, a decrease of 14.4% (Δ = -206 099) compared with 2019. The early months of the COVID-19 pandemic (March-May 2020) coincided with a nadir of cancer cases in April 2020 that did not recover to overall prepandemic levels through the remainder of 2020. In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the proportion of early-stage disease decreased sharply overall, while the proportion of late-stage disease increased. However, differences in observed to expected stage distribution in 2020 varied by primary disease site. Statistically significant differences in the overall observed to expected proportions of race and ethnicity, sex, insurance type, geographic location, education, and income were identified, but consistent patterns were not evident.

Conclusions and Relevance

Historically stable NCDB data models used for research, administrative, and quality improvement purposes were disrupted during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. NCDB data users will need to carefully interpret disease- and program-specific findings for years to come to account for pandemic year aberrations when running models that include 2020.

Evaluation of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Reliability of Cancer Surveillance Data in the National Cancer Database

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the reliability of cancer cases reported to the National Cancer Database (NCDB) during 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Total number of cancer cases reported to the NCDB between January 2018 and December 2020 were calculated for all cancers and 21 selected cancer sites. The additive outlier method was used to identify structural breaks in trends compared with previous years. The difference between expected (estimated using the vector autoregressive method) and observed number of cases diagnosed in 2020 was estimated using generalized estimating equation under assumptions of the Poisson distribution for count data. Interrupted time series analysis was used to compare changes in the number of records processed by registrars each month of 2020. All models accounted for seasonality, regional variation, and random error.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant decrease (structural break) in the number of cases diagnosed in April 2020, with no recovery in number of cases during subsequent months, leading to a 12.4% deficit in the number of cases diagnosed during the first year of the pandemic. While the number of cancer records initiated by cancer registrars also decreased, the number of records marked completed increased during the first months of the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant deficit in the number of cancer diagnoses in 2020 that was not due to cancer registrars' inability to extract data during the pandemic. Future studies can use NCDB data to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on cancer care and outcomes.

Past Disruptions in Health Insurance Coverage and Access to Care Among Insured Adults

INTRODUCTION

Although the association between health insurance coverage and access to care is well documented, it is unclear whether the deleterious effects of being uninsured are strictly contemporaneous or whether previous disruptions in coverage have persistent effects. This study addresses this issue using nationally representative data covering 2011-2019 to estimate the extent to which disruptions in health insurance coverage continued to be associated with poor access even after coverage was regained.

METHODS

Analysis was conducted in 2022. Using a nationally representative cohort of insured adults aged 18-64 years (N=39,904) and multivariable logistic regression models, the authors estimated the association between past disruptions in coverage (occurring at least 1 year before) and the risks of lacking a usual source of care provider and having unmet medical need.

RESULTS

Among insured nonelderly adults, the risk of being without a usual source of care provider was between 18% (risk ratio=1.18; 95% CI=1.00, 1.38) and 75% higher (risk ratio=1.75; 95% CI=1.56, 1.93) than for those with continuous coverage; the risk of having unmet medical needs was between 41% (risk ratio=1.41; 95% CI=1.00, 1.83) and 66% (risk ratio=1.66; 95% CI=1.26, 2.06) higher. Longer insurance disruptions were associated with a higher risk of lacking a usual source of care provider.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous disruptions in health insurance coverage continued to be negatively associated with access to care for more than a year after coverage was regained. Improving access to care in the U.S. may require investing in policies and programs that help to strengthen coverage continuity among individuals with insurance coverage rather than focusing exclusively on helping uninsured individuals to gain coverage.

Access to Care Among Adults with Limited English Proficiency

BACKGROUND

There are approximately 25.6 million individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) in the USA, and this number is increasing.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate associations between LEP and access to care in adults.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional nationally representative survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with (n = 18,908) and without (n = 98,060) LEP aged ≥ 18 years identified from the 2014-2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey MAIN MEASURES: Associations between LEP and access to healthcare and preventive services were evaluated with multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by age group (18-64 and ≥ 65 years). The official government definition of LEP (answers "not at all/not well/well" to the question "How well do you speak English?") was used. Access to care included having a usual source of care (and if so, distance from usual source of care, difficulty contacting usual source of care, and provision of extended hours), visiting a medical provider in the past 12 months, having to forego or delay care, and having trouble paying for medical bills. Preventive services included blood pressure and cholesterol check, flu vaccination, and cancer screening.

KEY RESULTS

Adults aged 18-64 years with LEP were significantly more likely to lack a usual source of care (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.27-2.70), not have visited a medical provider (aOR = 2.02; CI = 1.89-2.16), and to be overdue for receipt of preventive services, including blood pressure check (aOR = 2.00; CI = 1.79-2.23), cholesterol check (aOR = 1.22; CI = 1.03-1.44), and colorectal cancer screening (aOR = 1.58; CI = 1.37-1.83) than adults without LEP. Results were similar among adults aged ≥ 65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with LEP had consistently worse access to care than adults without LEP. System-level interventions, such as expanding access to health insurance coverage, providing language services, improving provider training in cultural competence, and increasing diversity in the medical workforce may minimize barriers and improve equity in access to care.

Climate change and health equity: A research agenda for psychological science

Climate change poses unique and substantial threats to public health and well-being, from heat stress, flooding, and the spread of infectious disease to food and water insecurity, conflict, displacement, and direct health hazards linked to fossil fuels. These threats are especially acute for frontline communities. Addressing climate change and its unequal impacts requires psychologists to consider temporal and spatial dimensions of health, compound risks, as well as structural sources of vulnerability implicated by few other public health challenges. In this review, we consider climate change as a unique context for the study of health inequities and the roles of psychologists and health care practitioners in addressing it. We conclude by discussing the research infrastructure needed to broaden current understanding of these inequities, including new cross-disciplinary, institutional, and community partnerships, and offer six practical recommendations for advancing the psychological study of climate health equity and its societal relevance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Association of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion and receipt of palliative care among individuals newly diagnosed with advanced stage cancers

73

Background: Receipt of palliative care is a guideline-based practice but is low among patients with advanced cancer is low in the U.S. Lack of insurance is a major barrier to accessing palliative care. It is unknown, however, whether Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the associated increase in insurance coverage among individuals diagnosed with cancer has led to increased palliative care. We use a nationwide dataset to examine the association between Medicaid expansion and receipt of palliative care among individuals newly diagnosed with advanced stage cancers. Methods: Individuals aged 18-64 years with newly diagnosed stage-IV solid cancers pre- (2010-2013) and post- (2014-2019) ACA Medicaid expansion were identified from the National Cancer Database. We used difference-in-differences (DD) analyses to estimate the association between Medicaid expansion and changes in receipt of palliative care as part of first-line therapy, adjusting for age group, sex, race/ethnicity, area-level poverty, metropolitan status, comorbidity, facility type, palliative care specialist availability, diagnosis year and state of residence. Stratified analyses were conducted by cancer type and sociodemographic factors. Results: A total of 685,781 individuals diagnosed with stage IV cancers were included from Medicaid expansion (N = 439,142) and non-expansion (N = 246,639) states. The percentage of eligible patients who received palliative care as part of first-line therapy increased from 17.0% pre-ACA to 18.9% post-ACA in Medicaid expansion states and from 15.7% to 16.7% in non-expansion states, resulting in a net increase (DD) of 1.4 (95%CI = 1.0-1.8) percentage points in expansion states after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. The increase in receipt of palliative care in expansion states compared to non-expansion states was greater for patients with advanced pancreatic (DD = 2.5; 95%CI = 0.8-4.3), colorectal (DD = 2.2; 95%CI = 1.1-3.3), female breast (DD = 1.9; 95%CI = 0.1-3.7), lung (DD = 1.6; 95%CI = 0.7-2.5), oral cavity and pharynx (DD = 1.1;95%CI = 0.5-1.6) cancers, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (DD = 0.9; 95%CI = 0.2-1.5). The improvement in receipt of palliative care was larger among individuals aged 55-64 years, non-Hispanic White patients, and patients residing in middle-income areas and nonmetropolitan areas. Conclusions: Among individuals newly diagnosed with stage-IV cancer, Medicaid expansion was associated with increases in receipt of palliative care, although overall use was low. Furthermore, the increase varied by cancer type and sociodemographic factors. Improving access to insurance can facilitate access to guideline-based palliative care.

Association of area-level mortgage discrimination and guideline-concordant non–small cell lung cancer care in the United States

3

Background: Disparities in receipt of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are well described. Discriminatory mortgage lending, which limits access to home ownership in specific neighborhoods overall and disproportionately for racialized groups, is a marker of systemic racism and lower levels of neighborhood investment. This may, in turn, decrease access to high quality care. We used the mortgage denial rate as a measure of housing discrimination and investigated its association with guideline-concordant NSCLC care. Methods: Mortgage denial rates were estimated at the zip code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) level using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) database (2014-2019). Mortgage denial rates represent the proportion of denied home loans to total loans and were categorized into quartiles. Individuals ≥ 18 years diagnosed with NSCLC 2014-2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database and combined with HMDA. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between mortgage discrimination and receipt of guideline-concordant care, including surgery, chemotherapy, and chemoradiation. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model examined the association between mortgage discrimination and time to chemotherapy initiation. Results: Cohort included 450,614 patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC resided in 33,120 ZCTAs. Individuals residing in ZCTAs with higher mortgage denial rates were more likely to be aged 45-64 years, male, non-Hispanic White, with private health insurance coverage and income < $40,000/year. 69% of all patients received guideline-concordant care. Likelihood of guideline-concordant care was lower in neighborhoods with higher mortgage denial rates, adjusting for age and sex (Table). This disparity was present in all care subgroups. Time to chemotherapy initiation was longer for patients in neighborhoods with higher mortgage denial rates. Conclusions: Mortgage discrimination is adversely associated with receipt of guideline-concordant NSCLC care. Our examination of institutional practices leading to barriers in access to resources highlights the critical need to understand the pathways through which area-level mortgage denials impact receipt of equitable cancer care.[Table: see text]

Association of historical housing discrimination and colon cancer treatment and outcomes in the United States

69

Background: In the 1930s, the federally-sponsored Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC) created maps that directed mortgage financing based largely on a neighborhood’s racial composition. American neighborhoods were subdivided into four risk-based rankings (A – best neighborhood, B – still desirable, C – in decline, and D – hazardous and mapped in red) for mortgage approvals and denials. “Redlining” resulted in racial segregation and systemic disinvestment in communities targeted for marginalization. We investigated the association between historical housing discrimination and contemporary diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes in colon cancer – a leading cause of cancer deaths amenable to early detection and treatment. Methods: Individuals diagnosed with colon cancer from 2007-2017 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Individuals residing within known zip code tabulation areas (ZCTA) in 196 cities with ≥10% HOLC coverage were included. Residences were assigned a HOLC grade (A, B, C, or D) based on the majority HOLC area represented. Multivariable logistic regression models (adjusted for age and sex) were used to investigate the association of housing discrimination and late stage (stages III/IV) diagnosis, time to chemotherapy initiation, and non-guideline-concordant care (no chemotherapy, surgery, or < 12 lymph node dissection). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with age as time scale were used to investigate the association of housing discrimination and overall survival. Results: There were 98,335 patients with new diagnoses of colon cancer with median age 68 years. Individuals residing in HOLC D were more likely to be non-Hispanic White (59%), have public insurance (46%), and income < $40,000/year. Compared to people living in majority HOLC A ZCTAs, living in majority HOLC D had higher odds of a late-stage diagnosis, and living in majority HOLC B, C, or D had higher odds of non-guideline concordant colon cancer care with longer time to chemotherapy initiation. For people living in majority HOLC C and D, overall survival for all stages and late stage was worse when compared to HOLC A ZCTAs. Findings were consistent in sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: Historical housing discrimination is adversely associated with contemporary colon cancer care and outcomes. Findings underscore the importance of state-and federal-level practices on mortgage lending regulation and fair housing practices in determining equitable cancer risk, access to care, and outcomes.[Table: see text]

The first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and health among cancer survivors in the United States

Background

Cancer survivors represent a population with high health care needs. If and how cancer survivors were affected by the first year of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic are largely unknown.

Methods

Using data from the nationwide, population‐based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2017–2020), the authors investigated changes in health‐related measures during the COVID‐19 pandemic among cancer survivors and compared them with changes among adults without a cancer history in the United States. Sociodemographic and health‐related measures such as insurance coverage, employment status, health behaviors, and health status were self‐reported. Adjusted prevalence ratios of health‐related measures in 2020 versus 2017–2019 were calculated with multivariable logistic regressions and stratified by age group (18–64 vs. ≥65 years).

Results

Among adults aged 18–64 years, the uninsured rate did not change significantly in 2020 despite increases in unemployment. The prevalence of unhealthy behaviors, such as insufficient sleep and smoking, decreased in 2020, and self‐rated health improved, regardless of cancer history. Notably, declines in smoking were larger among cancer survivors than nonelderly adults without a cancer history. Few changes were observed for adults aged ≥65 years.

Conclusions

Further research is needed to confirm the observed positive health behavior and health changes and to investigate the role of potential mechanisms, such as the national and regional policy responses to the pandemic regarding insurance coverage, unemployment benefits, and financial assistance. As polices related to the public health emergency expire, ongoing monitoring of longer term effects of the pandemic on cancer survivorship is warranted.

Among cancer survivors aged 18–64 years, the uninsured rate did not change significantly in 2020 despite increases in unemployment. The prevalence of unhealthy behaviors, such as insufficient sleep and smoking, decreased in 2020, and self‐rated health improved, regardless of cancer history.

Suicide risk among patients with cancer in the United States, 2000-2016

12119

Background: Individuals diagnosed with cancer have elevated suicide risk in the US, although little is known about risk associated with state of residence, health insurance coverage, or time since diagnosis by cancer types. This study used a recent national dataset to examine a wide range of patients’ sociodemographic and clinical factors that may be associated with suicide risks. Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with cancer from 43 population-based state cancer registries in 2000-2016 with follow-up through Dec 31, 2016. Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMR) and 95% confidence intervals (95CI) were calculated by state of residence, attained age group, sex, and race/ethnicity to compare suicide risks in the cohort vs. the general US population. Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95CI from multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were derived to identify cancer-specific risk factors of suicide among the cohort, controlling for competing risks from other causes of death. Results: Among 16,771,397 patients, 7,972,782 (47.5%) died during the study period, and 20,792 (0.3%) from suicide. The overall SMR for suicide was 1.26 (95CI = 1.24-1.28), decreasing from 1.67 (95CI 1.47-1.88) in 2000 to 1.16 (95CI 1.11-1.21) in 2016. Patients from Alaska, Colorado and Idaho, those aged 65-69 years (SMR = 1.44, 95CI = 1.39-1.50), Hispanic patients (SMR = 1.48, 95CI = 1.38-1.58), those uninsured (SMR = 1.66, 95CI = 1.53-1.80) or insured with Medicaid (SMR = 1.72, 95CI = 1.61-1.84) or ≤64 years of age with Medicare (SMR = 1.94, 95CI = 1.80-2.07) had the highest suicide risks compared to the general population. Moreover, the highest suicide risk occurred within two years of diagnosis (SMR [95CI] = 7.19 [6.97-7.41], 5.60 [5.35-5.84] and 4.18 [4.03-4.33] for ≤5 months, 6-11 months, and 12-23 months after cancer diagnosis, respectively). In the first two years following diagnosis, the risk of suicide was higher in patients diagnosed with distant-stage than early-stage diseases (HR = 1.29, 95CI = 1.21-1.37), and in patients with more cancer types with poor prognoses and high symptom burdens, such as cancers of oral cavity & pharynx, esophagus, stomach, brain, lung and pancreas (HRs ranged 1.23-2.10 vs. colorectal cancer, all P≤0.001). After two years, patients diagnosed with cancers subject to long-term quality of life impairment, such as cancers of oral cavity & pharynx, female breast, bladder, and leukemia (HRs ranged 1.17-1.54 vs. colorectal cancer, all P≤0.01), had higher suicide risks. Conclusions: Suicide risk among patients diagnosed with cancer decreased during the past two decades but remained elevated compared to the general population. Different geographic, racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors, some of which are modifiable, contribute to increased suicide risk among patients diagnosed with cancer. Tailored social and psych-oncological interventions are warranted for suicide prevention in this vulnerable population.

Oncologist consideration of patient health insurance coverage and out-of-pocket costs for genomic testing in treatment decision

6600

Background: Use of genomic testing, especially multi-marker tumor panels, is increasing in the United States. Not all tests and related treatments are covered by health insurance, which can result in substantial patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Although most patients are concerned about OOP costs, little is known about oncologists’ treatment decisions with respect to patient health insurance coverage and OOP costs for genomic testing. Methods: We identified 1,049 oncologists who reported using multi-marker tumor panels from the 2017 National Survey of Precision Medicine in Cancer Treatment. Separate multivariable ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to assess the associations of oncologist, practice, and patient characteristics and the oncologist ratings of the importance of health insurance coverage and OOP cost for genomic testing as part of treatment decisions. Results: Among oncologists, 47.3%, 32.7% and 20.0% reported that patient insurance coverage for genomic testing was very important, somewhat important, and a little/not important, respectively, in treatment decisions. 56.9%, 28.0%, and 15.2% reported patient OOP costs for genomic testing were very, somewhat, or a little/not important in treatment decisions, respectively. In adjusted ordinal logistic regression analyses, oncologists who used next-generation gene sequencing tests were more likely to report patient health insurance and OOP costs for testing as important (odds ratio (OR) = 2.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2, 3.5) and (OR = 2.1; 95%CI: 1.2, 3.7), respectively) in treatment decisions. Oncologists with more years of experience, who treated solid tumors (rather than only hematological cancers), worked in practices without molecular tumor boards for genomic tests, and with higher percentages of patients insured by Medicaid or self-paid/uninsured also reported insurance coverage or OOP costs for testing were important in treatment decisions (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Physician, practice, and patient characteristics were associated with oncologists’ ratings of the importance of patient health insurance and OOP costs in treatment decisions. Identifying factors that influence physicians’ priorities in treatment decisions may inform the development and targeting of interventions to support patient and physician discussions about oncology care.

Racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care for early-onset colorectal cancer in the U.S

6544

Background: Early-onset colorectal cancer patients who are Black are less likely to survive than white patients, even for early-stage disease, possibly due to differences in receipt of guideline-concordant care. This study evaluated racial disparities in receipt of timely and guideline-concordant colon and rectal cancer care in a large nationwide sample. Methods: Non-Hispanic Black and white individuals aged 20-49 years newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer during 2004-2019 were selected from the National Cancer Database. Patients who received all care recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (staging, surgery, lymph node evaluation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy) for which they were eligible according to cancer subsite and clinical and pathological TNM stage were considered guideline concordant. Demographic characteristics (age and sex), comorbidities, and health insurance coverage type were added sequentially to a series of multivariable models to estimate contribution to racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care. Racial disparities in time from diagnosis date (among rectal cancer patients eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and surgery date (among colon cancer patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy) to date of chemotherapy initiation was evaluated using restricted mean survival time. Results: Of the 84,728 colon and 62,483 rectal cancer patients, 20.8% and 14.5% were Black, respectively. Black patients were less likely to receive guideline concordant care than white patients diagnosed with colon and rectal cancer, respectively (Table). Demographic characteristics and comorbidities combined explained less than 5% of the disparity, while health insurance coverage type explained 28.6% and 19.4% of the disparity among colon and rectal cancer patients, respectively. Restricted mean time to chemotherapy was statistically significantly longer among Black than white patients for colon (54.0 vs 48.7 days, p <.001) and rectal cancers (49.6 vs 40.9 days, p <.001), respectively. Conclusions: Black patients diagnosed with early-onset colorectal cancer receive worse and less timely care than their white counterparts. Differences in health insurance coverage type, a modifiable factor, were the largest identified contributor to the racial disparities in receipt of guideline-concordant care, suggesting that improved access to care could help mitigate disparities in cancer outcomes. [Table: see text]

Changes in cancer-related mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States

6581

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in delayed medical care that may have led to increased death rates in 2020 among people with medical conditions such as cancer. This study examined changes in cancer-related mortality between 2019 and 2020. Methods: We used the US 2019-2020 Multiple Cause of Death database from the CDC WONDER to identify cancer-related deaths, defined as decedents with invasive or noninvasive cancer as a contributing cause of death (ICD-10 codes: C00-C97 and D00-D09). We compared age-standardized cancer-related annual and monthly mortality rates (per 100,000 person-years and person-months, respectively) in January-December 2020 (pandemic) versus January-December 2019 (pre-pandemic) overall and stratified by rurality and place of death. We calculated the 2020 excess death by comparing the numbers of observed death with the projected death based on age-specific cancer-related death rate from 2015 to 2019. Results: The number of cancer-related deaths was 686 054 in 2020, up from 664 888 in 2019, with an annual increase of 3.2%. Compared to the number of projected deaths for 2020 (666 286), the number of cancer-related excess deaths was 19 768 in 2020. Annual age-standardized cancer-related mortality rate (per 100,000 person-years) continuously decreased from 173.7 in 2015 to 162.1 in 2019, while it increased to 164.1 in 2020 (2020 vs 2019 rate ratio (RR): 1.013, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.009 - 1.016). The cancer-related monthly mortality rate was higher in April 2020 (RR: 1.032, 95% CI: 1.020 – 1.044) when healthcare capacity was most challenged by the pandemic, subsequently declined in May and June 2020, and higher mortality rates were again observed each month from July to December 2020 compared to 2019. In large metropolitan areas, the largest increase in cancer-related mortality was observed in April 2020, while in non-metropolitan areas, the largest increases occurred from July to December 2020, coinciding with the time-spatial pattern of COVID-19 incidence in the country. Compared to 2019, cancer-related mortality rates were lower from March to December 2020 in medical facilities, hospice facilities, and nursing homes or long-term care settings but higher in decedent's homes. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant increases in cancer-related deaths in 2020 versus 2019. Ongoing evaluation of the spatial-temporal effects of the pandemic on cancer care and outcomes is warranted, especially in relation to patterns in vaccine uptake and COVID-19 hospitalization rates.[Table: see text]

Cancer Groundshot: Building a Robust Cancer Control Platform in Addition To Launching the Cancer Moonshot

Cancer Groundshot is a philosophy that calls for prioritization of strategies in global cancer control. The underlying principle of Cancer Groundshot is that one must ensure access to interventions that are already proven to work before focusing on the development of new interventions. In this article, we discuss the philosophy of Cancer Groundshot as it pertains to priorities in cancer care and research in low- and middle-income countries and the utility of technology in addressing global cancer disparities; we also address disparities seen in high-income countries. The oncology community needs to realign our priorities and focus on improving access to high-value cancer control strategies, rather than allocating resources primarily to the development of technologies that provide only marginal gains at a high cost. There are several "low-hanging fruit" actions that will improve access to quality cancer care in low- and middle-income countries and in high-income countries. Worldwide, cancer morbidity and mortality can be averted by implementing highly effective, low-cost interventions that are already known to work, rather than investing in the development of resource-intensive interventions to which most patients will not have access (i.e., we can use Cancer Groundshot to first save more lives before we focus on the "moonshots").

Association of Race With Receipt of Proton Beam Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer in the US, 2004-2018

IMPORTANCE

Black patients are less likely than White patients to receive guideline-concordant cancer care in the US. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a potentially superior technology to photon radiotherapy for tumors with complex anatomy, tumors surrounded by sensitive tissues, and childhood cancers.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether there are racial disparities in the receipt of PBT among Black and White individuals diagnosed with all PBT-eligible cancers in the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study evaluated Black and White individuals diagnosed with PBT-eligible cancers between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018, in the National Cancer Database, a nationwide hospital-based cancer registry that collects data on radiation treatment, even when it is received outside the reporting facility. American Society of Radiation Oncology model policies were used to classify patients into those for whom PBT is the recommended radiation therapy modality (group 1) and those for whom evidence of PBT efficacy is still under investigation (group 2). Propensity score matching was used to ensure comparability of Black and White patients' clinical characteristics and regional availability of PBT according to the National Academy of Medicine's definition of disparities. Data analysis was performed from October 4, 2021, to February 22, 2022.

EXPOSURE

Patients' self-identified race was ascertained from medical records.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was receipt of PBT, with disparities in this therapy's use evaluated with logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 5 225 929 patients who were eligible to receive PBT and included in the study, 13.6% were Black, 86.4% were White, and 54.3% were female. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 63.2 (12.4) years. Black patients were less likely to be treated with PBT than their White counterparts (0.3% vs 0.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.64-0.71). Racial disparities were greater for group 1 cancers (0.4% vs 0.8%; OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.55) than group 2 cancers (0.3% vs 0.4%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80). Racial disparities in PBT receipt among group 1 cancers increased over time (annual percent change = 0.09, P < .001) and were greatest in 2018, the most recent year of available data.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, Black patients were less likely to receive PBT than their White counterparts, and disparities were greatest for cancers for which PBT was the recommended radiation therapy modality. These findings suggest that efforts other than increasing the number of facilities that provide PBT will be needed to eliminate disparities.

Assessment of Proton Beam Therapy Use Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer in the US, 2004-2018

IMPORTANCE

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a potentially superior technology to photon radiotherapy for tumors with complex anatomy, those surrounded by sensitive tissues, and childhood cancers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patterns of use of PBT according to the present American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) clinical indications in the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Individuals newly diagnosed with cancer between 2004 and 2018 were selected from the National Cancer Database. Data analysis was performed from October 4, 2021, to February 22, 2022. ASTRO's Model Policies (2017) were used to classify patients into group 1, for which health insurance coverage for PBT treatment is recommended, and group 2, for which coverage is recommended only if additional requirements are met.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Use of PBT.

RESULTS

Of the 5 919 368 patients eligible to receive PBT included in the study, 3 206 902 were female (54.2%), and mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 62.6 (12.3) years. Use of PBT in the US increased from 0.4% in 2004 to 1.2% in 2018 (annual percent change [APC], 8.12%; P < .001) due to increases in group 1 from 0.4% in 2010 to 2.2% in 2018 (APC, 21.97; P < .001) and increases in group 2 from 0.03% in 2014 to 0.1% in 2018 (APC, 30.57; P < .001). From 2010 to 2018, among patients in group 2, PBT targeted to the breast increased from 0.0% to 0.9% (APC, 51.95%), and PBT targeted to the lung increased from 0.1% to 0.7% (APC, 28.06%) (P < .001 for both). Use of PBT targeted to the prostate decreased from 1.4% in 2011 to 0.8% in 2014 (APC, -16.48%; P = .03) then increased to 1.3% in 2018 (APC, 12.45; P < .001). Most patients in group 1 treated with PBT had private insurance coverage in 2018 (1039 [55.4%]); Medicare was the most common insurance type among those in group 2 (1973 [52.5%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study show an increase in the use of PBT in the US between 2004 to 2018; prostate was the only cancer site for which PBT use decreased temporarily between 2011 and 2014, increasing again between 2014 and 2018. These findings may be especially relevant for Medicare radiation oncology coverage policies.

Abstract PO-215: Racial disparities in proton beam therapy use for newly diagnosed cancer patients in the United States

Background: Black patients are less likely than White patients in the US to receive guideline-concordant cancer care, including radiation therapy. Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) is a potentially superior technology to photon radiotherapy for the treatment of pediatric cancers, where decreasing late effects of radiation treatment is a main concern, and in cancers where pituitary, visual, auditory, and intellectual functions might be disrupted because of radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of racial disparities in PBT use in the US. Methods: We identified 4,919,975 Black and White patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) based on data collected from Commission on Cancer (CoC) accredited hospitals. Once a patient is diagnosed and/or treated at a CoC accredited facility, the patient is followed and all treatment is reported (including treatment received outside of the reporting facility). Therefore, NCDB captures PBT received both at CoC-accredited hospitals (59.5% of patients who received PBT in this study) and PBT received at hospitals not accredited by CoCs (40.5% of PBT patients in this study). American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Model Policies were used to classify patients into Group 1, for which PBT is the recommended radiation therapy modality, and Group 2, for which evidence of PBT efficacy is still under investigation. Propensity score matching was used to ensure comparability of Black and White patients' clinical characteristics and regional availability of PBT. Results: Black cancer patients were less likely to be treated with PBT than White cancer patients with similar characteristics (Odds Ratios [OR]: 0.72; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.68, 0.76). Racial disparities were greater for Group 1 cancers (OR = 0.61; CI: 0.54, 0.69) than for Group 2 cancers (OR: 0.75; CI: 0.70, 0.81). Disparities were greatest for Group 1 cancers commonly diagnosed in children, such as central nervous system (OR: 0.54; CI: 0.46, 0.63) and rhabdomyosarcoma (OR: 0.47; CI: 0.31, 0.70). Racial disparities in PBT receipt among Group 1 cancers increased during the study period and were greatest in 2018 despite the increase in the number of facilities offering PBT from 4 to 28 during the corresponding period, Conclusion and Relevance: Racial disparities in PBT receipt are greatest for cancers for which PBT is the recommended radiation therapy modality. The racial disparities identified in our study suggest undertreatment of Black patients with the greatest need (e.g. children diagnosed with central nervous system cancers). Future studies are needed to identify modifiable factors contributing to the racial disparity in receipt of PBT as efforts other than increasing the number of facilities providing PBT will be needed to eliminate disparities.

Citation Format: Leticia M. Nogueira, Ahmedin Jemal, Jason A. Efstathiou, K. Robin Yabroff. Racial disparities in proton beam therapy use for newly diagnosed cancer patients in the United States [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-215.

Health Insurance Disruptions and Care Access and Affordability in the U.S

INTRODUCTION

Health insurance is associated with better care in the U.S., but little is known about the associations of coverage disruptions (i.e., periods without insurance) with care access, receipt, and affordability.

METHODS

Adults aged 18-64 years with current private (n=124,746), public (n=30,932), or no (n=31,802) insurance coverage were identified from the 2011-2018 National Health Interview Survey. Data were analyzed in 2020. Separate multivariable logistic regressions evaluated the associations of having coverage disruptions or being uninsured with care access, receipt, and affordability.

RESULTS

Overall, 5.0% of currently insured adults with private and 10.7% with public insurance reported a coverage disruption in the previous year, representing nearly 9.1 million adults in 2018. Among currently uninsured, 24.9% reported coverage loss within the previous year, representing nearly 8.1 million adults in 2018. Among adults with current private or current public coverage, disruptions were associated with lower receipt of all preventive services (AOR=0.42, 95% CI=0.37, 0.46 and AOR=0.48, 95% CI=0.40, 0.58, respectively), with forgoing any needed care because of cost (AOR=4.79, 95% CI=4.44, 5.17 and AOR=4.28, 95% CI=3.86, 4.75), and with medication nonadherence because of cost (AOR=3.55, 95% CI=3.13, 4.03 and AOR=4.09, 95% CI=3.43, 4.88) compared with that among adults with continuous coverage (p<0.05). Longer disruptions among currently insured adults were significantly associated with worse care access, receipt, and affordability, with dose-response patterns. Currently uninsured adults, especially those with longer uninsured periods, reported significantly worse care access, receipt, and affordability than currently insured adults with coverage disruptions or continuous coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight the importance of continuous insurance coverage; disruptions owing to the COVID-19 pandemic will likely have adverse consequences for care access and affordability.

Abstract D085: Differences in the use of proton beam therapy among patients diagnosed with American Society for Radiation Oncology Group 1 proton beam therapy indication cancer types in the United States

Purpose: To examine the extent of racial/ethnic and geographic differences in the use of proton beam therapy (PBT) among newly diagnosed cancer patients in the United States. Methods: We included all patients diagnosed from 2009 to 2016 with invasive single or first primary cancer categorized as Group 1 indication (recommended) for PBT by the American Society for Radiation Oncology. We conducted descriptive and multivariable multinomial logistic regression analyses to assess patient and facility characteristics associated with receipt of PBT. Results: Of the total 246,932 patients diagnosed with Group 1 indication cancer types, 0.6% received PBT. PBT use was lower in non-Hispanic (NH) blacks compared with NH whites (0.3% vs 0.6%). Patients who were older, uninsured, with low median income, higher comorbidity score, treated at low volume or community programs or at facilities located in the south, and residing in rural areas had the lowest PBT use. There was a 46% relative difference in PBT use between NH blacks and NH whites, with marked variation by geographic region of facility. NH black had 37% lower odds of receiving PBT compared with NH whites (odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.79), which became nonsignificant after accounting for difference in cancer type. Further, minority race/ethnicity, older age, high comorbidity score, uninsurance/non-private insurance, treatment out of NCI-designated center, and treatment out of facilities in the northeast region were significantly associated with lower odds of PBT use versus no radiation treatment. Conclusions: Despite very low overall PBT use in the United States, there were marked differences in PBT use among patients diagnosed with Group 1 indication cancer types by race/ethnicity and geographic region of treatment facility.

Citation Format: Helmneh M. Sineshaw, K. Robin Yabroff, Ahmedin Jemal, Leticia M. Nogueira, Jason A. Efstathiou. Differences in the use of proton beam therapy among patients diagnosed with American Society for Radiation Oncology Group 1 proton beam therapy indication cancer types in the United States [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr D085.

Association Between Declared Hurricane Disasters and Survival of Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Radiation Treatment

This study uses National Cancer Database data to estimate associations between hurricane disaster declarations, which could disrupt electrical power, and survival of patients undergoing radiotherapy for nonoperative locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer between 2004 and 2014.

Patterns of Coverage Gains Among Young Adult Cancer Patients Following the Affordable Care Act

The dependent coverage expansion (DCE) and Medicaid expansions (ME) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may differentially affect eligibility for health insurance coverage in young adult cancer patients. Studies examining temporal patterns of coverage changes in young adults following these policies are lacking. We used data from the National Cancer Database 2003–2015 to conduct a quasi-experimental study of cancer patients ages 19–34 years, grouped as DCE-eligible (19- to 25-year-olds) and DCE-ineligible (27- to 34-year-olds). Although private insurance coverage in DCE-eligible cancer patients increased incrementally following DCE implementation (0.5 per quarter; P < .001), an immediate effect on Medicaid coverage gains was observed after ME in all young adult cancer patients (3.01 for DCE-eligible and 1.62 for DCE-ineligible, both P < .001). Therefore, DCE and ME each had statistically significant and distinct effects on insurance coverage gains. Distinct temporal patterns of ACA policies’ impact on insurance coverage gains likely affect patterns of receipt of cancer care. Temporal patterns should be considered when evaluating the impact of health policies.

Diet and biliary tract cancer risk in Shanghai, China

Trends in biliary tract cancer incidence rates have increased in Shanghai, China. These trends have coincided with economic and developmental growth, as well as a shift in dietary patterns to a more Westernized diet. To examine the effect of dietary changes on incident disease, we evaluated associations between diet and biliary tract cancers amongst men and women from a population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China. Biliary tract cancer cases were recruited from 42 collaborating hospitals in urban Shanghai, and population-based controls were randomly selected from the Shanghai Household Registry. Food frequency questionnaire data were available for 225 gallbladder, 190 extrahepatic bile duct, and 68 ampulla of Vater cancer cases. A total of 39 food groups were created and examined for associations with biliary tract cancer. Interestingly, only four food groups demonstrated a suggested association with gallbladder, extrahepatic bile duct, or ampulla of Vater cancers. The allium food group, consisting of onions, garlic, and shallots showed an inverse association with gallbladder cancer (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.97). Similar trends were seen in the food group containing seaweed and kelp (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.96). In contrast, both preserved vegetables and salted meats food groups showed positive associations with gallbladder cancer (OR:1.27, 95% CI: 1.06-1.52; OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.37, respectively). Each of these four food groups showed similar trends for extrahepatic bile duct and ampulla of Vater cancers. The results of our analysis suggest intake of foods with greater anti-inflammatory properties may play a role in decreasing the risk of biliary tract cancers. Future studies should be done to better understand effects of cultural changes on diet, and to further examine the impact diet and inflammation have on biliary tract cancer incidence.

Abstract P4-05-01: Diet, development and predisposition to breast cancer: The impact of sugar derived metabolites (AGEs) on pubertal mammary gland development

The mammary gland is one of the few organs that continues to develop postnatally through stages including puberty, pregnancy, lactation, and involution. The gland is composed of epithelial and stromal cells that include fibroblasts, adipocytes, endothelial cells, nerve cells, and macrophages. Terminal end bud (TEB) structures are found exclusively in the pubertal developmental stage. The formation of TEBs and side branching drives mammary gland epithelial cell invasion into the mammary fat pad, continuing until the entire fat pad is filled. Pubertal mammary gland morphogenesis integrates a balance of epithelial cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Several studies have shown that the interaction between mammary epithelial and stromal cells is crucial for the proper postnatal development of the mammary ductal tree. Interestingly, studies have shown that processes important in mammary gland development are often deregulated during breast cancer tumorigenesis. Thus, understanding the complex signaling network as well as the interactions between the different cell types during mammary gland development will be vital for elucidating the mechanisms underlying breast cancer progression and metastasis.

Glycation is the non-enzymatic glycosylation of sugar moieties to biological macromolecules such as protein and DNA which produces reactive metabolites known as advanced glycation end products (AGE's). AGE content in the Western Diet has consistently increased over the last 50 years due to increased consumption of sugar laden and cheap processed/manufactured foods which are high in reactive AGE metabolites. AGE containing food can lead to the accumulation of AGEs in the body overtime leading to pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidant effects when signaling through receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). Leading too many complications associated with diseases including diabetes, Alzheimer's, heart disease and cancer. Preliminary data in our lab has shown that AGEs also have an effect on phosphorylation and signaling of estrogen receptor α (ERα), a key receptor and signaling pathway in the regulation of mammary gland development during puberty. This observation, together with the links between diet, mammary gland development and immune cell recruitment lead us to examine the biological effects of a diet high in AGEs on pubertal mammary gland development in mice. We observed a significant disruption of normal pubertal mammary gland development in mice fed a high AGE diet when compared to mice fed a control diet. Mice fed the high AGE diet showed increases in TEB number as well as width, length and area. We also observed an increase in ductal branching and a decrease in ductal extension. Future studies will assess the role of macrophage recruitment to the developing gland, specifically around the TEBs based on its reported role in normal TEB function. We also plan to assess ERa signaling in mice fed the high AGE diet based on the reported role of estrogen signaling in ductal elongation.

Citation Format: Krisanits BA, Nogueira LM, Findlay VJ, Turner DP. Diet, development and predisposition to breast cancer: The impact of sugar derived metabolites (AGEs) on pubertal mammary gland development [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-05-01.

Serum C-peptide, Total and High Molecular Weight Adiponectin, and Pancreatic Cancer: Do Associations Differ by Smoking?

Background: Studies examining associations between circulating concentrations of C-peptide and total adiponectin, two biomarkers related to obesity and insulin secretion and sensitivity and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) risk have shown inconsistent results and included limited numbers of smokers.Methods: We examined associations of these biomarkers and high molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin with PDA, overall, and by smoking status. We conducted a pooled nested case-control analysis in 3 cohorts (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Trial, Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study, and Cancer Prevention Study-II), with 758 cases (435 current smokers) and 1,052 controls (531 smokers) matched by cohort, age, sex, race, blood draw date and follow-up time. We used conditional logistic regression adjusted for age, smoking, diabetes, and body mass index to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results: Circulating C-peptide concentration was not associated with PDA in never or former smokers, but was inversely associated with PDA in current smokers (per SD OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.84; P_interaction = 0.005). HMW adiponectin was inversely associated with PDA in never smokers (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.81), not associated in former smokers, and positively associated in smokers (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.45; P_interaction = 0.009). Total adiponectin was not associated with PDA in nonsmokers or current smokers.Conclusions: Associations of biomarkers of insulin secretion and sensitivity with PDA differ by smoking status. Smoking-induced pancreatic damage may explain the associations in smokers while mechanisms related to insulin resistance associations in nonsmokers.Impact: Future studies of these biomarkers and PDA should examine results by smoking status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(6); 914-22. ©2017 AACR.