Calderón Vicente DMª, Marco Martínez A, Gómez García I, Quílez Toboso R, Quiroga López I, Delgado Rey M, Gargallo Vaamonde J, Olmos Alemán M, Miralles Moragrega R, Gonzalvo Díaz C, González López J. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on gestational diabetes in Castilla-La Mancha (Spain).
ENDOCRINOL DIAB NUTR 2024;
71:53-60. [PMID:
38493008 DOI:
10.1016/j.endien.2024.03.005]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
SUBJECT-MATTER
To assess the effect of the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on gestational diabetes (GDM).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
In this retrospective, multicentre, non-interventional study carried out in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, we compared 663 women with GDM exposed to the pandemic (pandemic group), with 622 women with GDM seen one year earlier (pre-pandemic group). The primary endpoint was a Large for Gestational Age (LGA) newborn as an indicator of poor GDM control. Secondary endpoints included obstetric and neonatal complications.
RESULTS
During the pandemic, the gestational week at diagnosis (24.2 ± 7.4 vs 22.9 ± 7.7, p = 0.0016) and first visit to Endocrinology (26.6 ± 7.2 vs 25.3 ± 7.6, p = 0.0014) were earlier. Face-to-face consultations were maintained in most cases (80.3%). The new diagnostic criteria for GDM were used in only 3% of cases. However, in the pandemic group, the final HbA1c was higher (5.2 ± 0.48 vs 5.29 ± 0.44%, p = 0.047) and there were more LGA newborns (8.5% vs 12.8%, p = 0.015). There were no differences in perinatal complications.
CONCLUSIONS
Care for GDM in our Public Health System did not significantly deteriorate during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this did not prevent a higher number of LGA newborns.
Collapse