|
1
|
Prazyan A, Podlutskii M, Volkova P, Kazakova E, Bitarishvili S, Shesterikova E, Saburov V, Makarenko E, Lychenkova M, Korol M, Kazakov E, Moiseev A, Geras’kin S, Bondarenko E. Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Gamma-, Electron, and Proton Irradiation on Transcriptomic Profile of Hordeum vulgare L. Seedlings: In Search for Molecular Contributors to Abiotic Stress Resilience. Plants (Basel) 2024; 13:342. [PMID: 38337875 PMCID: PMC10857502 DOI: 10.3390/plants13030342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
The development of adaptation strategies for crops under ever-changing climate conditions is a critically important food security issue. Studies of barley responses to ionising radiation showed that this evolutionarily ancient stress factor can be successfully used to identify molecular pathways involved in adaptation to a range of abiotic stressors. In order to identify potential molecular contributors to abiotic stress resilience, we examined the transcriptomic profiles of barley seedlings after exposure to γ-rays, electrons, and protons. A total of 553 unique differentially expressed genes with increased expression and 124 with decreased expression were detected. Among all types of radiation, the highest number of differentially expressed genes was observed in electron-irradiated samples (428 upregulated and 56 downregulated genes). Significant upregulation after exposure to the three types of radiation was shown by a set of ROS-responsive genes, genes involved in DNA repair, cell wall metabolism, auxin biosynthesis and signalling, as well as photosynthesis-related genes. Most of these genes are known to be involved in plant ROS-mediated responses to other abiotic stressors, especially with genotoxic components, such as heavy metals and drought. Ultimately, the modulation of molecular pathways of plant responses to ionising radiation may be a prospective tool for stress tolerance programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Prazyan
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Mikhail Podlutskii
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| | | | - Elizaveta Kazakova
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Sofia Bitarishvili
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Shesterikova
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Vyacheslav Saburov
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre—Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Makarenko
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Maria Lychenkova
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Marina Korol
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Evgeniy Kazakov
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre—Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Alexander Moiseev
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Centre—Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 249036 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Stanislav Geras’kin
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Bondarenko
- Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Kazakova E, Gorbatova I, Khanova A, Shesterikova E, Pishenin I, Prazyan A, Podlutskii M, Blinova Y, Bitarishvili S, Bondarenko E, Smirnova A, Lychenkova M, Bondarenko V, Korol M, Babina D, Makarenko E, Volkova P. Radiation Hormesis in Barley Manifests as Changes in Growth Dynamics Coordinated with the Expression of PM19L-like, CML31-like, and AOS2-like. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:974. [PMID: 38256048 PMCID: PMC10815718 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25020974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The stimulation of growth and development of crops using ionising radiation (radiation hormesis) has been reported by many research groups. However, specific genes contributing to the radiation stimulation of plant growth are largely unknown. In this work, we studied the impact of the low-dose γ-irradiation of barley seeds on the growth dynamics and gene expression of eight barley cultivars in a greenhouse experiment. Our findings confirmed that candidate genes of the radiation growth stimulation, previously established in barley seedlings (PM19L-like, CML31-like, and AOS2-like), are significant in radiation hormesis throughout ontogeny. In γ-stimulated cultivars, the expression of these genes was aligned with the growth dynamics, yield parameters, and physiological conditions of plants. We identified contrasting cultivars for future gene editing and found that the γ-stimulated cultivar possessed some specific abiotic stress-responsive elements in the promotors of candidate genes, possibly revealing a new level of radiation hormesis effect execution. These results can be used in creating new productive barley cultivars, ecological toxicology of radionuclides, and eustress biology studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizaveta Kazakova
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Irina Gorbatova
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Anastasia Khanova
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Ekaterina Shesterikova
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Ivan Pishenin
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Alexandr Prazyan
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Mikhail Podlutskii
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Yana Blinova
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Sofia Bitarishvili
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Ekaterina Bondarenko
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Alena Smirnova
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Maria Lychenkova
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Vladimir Bondarenko
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Marina Korol
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Daria Babina
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | - Ekaterina Makarenko
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Radiobiology, Russian Institute of Radiology and Agroecology of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 249035 Obninsk, Russia; (E.K.); (I.G.); (A.K.); (E.S.); (I.P.); (A.P.); (Y.B.); (S.B.); (E.B.); (A.S.); (M.L.); (V.B.); (M.K.); (D.B.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the psychological impact of living near a nuclear waste disaster that involved ongoing threat of radioactive contamination. METHOD Participants were an exposed sample (residence within a 5-mile radius of the nuclear plant) of 120 children (7-15 years old) and their parents and a nonexposed comparison sample of 60 children and their parents. Parent and self-ratings of the children's psychological functioning and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms were obtained, along with cognitive variables. RESULTS Minimal differences between the 2 samples were found. In the exposed sample, stress responses for the child self-reports showed several age group by gender interactions. Girls' PTSD symptoms tended to increase with age while boys' symptoms decreased, with intrusion showing the strongest effects. While child and parent PTSD symptom ratings were correlated, children reported approximately twice as many symptoms. Cognitive understanding increased with age and was greater in boys. Exposure and parent functioning significantly predicted outcome. CONCLUSIONS Age and gender effects after disaster might best be explored as an interaction. While disaster effects were mild, the psychological health of the parents may be an important determinant of psychological health in children in this type of disaster.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Korol
- Mount Saint Mary's College, Emmitsburg, MD 21727, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Abstract
Psychiatric reports of 179 children aged 2 to 15 who were exposed to the Buffalo Creek dam collapse in 1972 were rated for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms 2 years after the disaster. Age and gender effects and the impact of the level of exposure and parental functioning were examined according to a conceptual model addressing factors contributing to adaptation to a traumatic event. Results showed fewer PTSD symptoms in the youngest age group and higher symptom levels for girls than boys. Approximately 37% of the children were given a "probable" diagnosis of PTSD. Multiple regression analysis showed that life threat, gender, parental psychopathology, and an irritable and/or depressed family atmosphere all contributed to the prediction of PTSD symptomatology in the children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B L Green
- Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC 20007-2197
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|