1
|
Cunningham M, Schiewer MJ. PARP-ish: Gaps in Molecular Understanding and Clinical Trials Targeting PARP Exacerbate Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res 2024:743102. [PMID: 38635890 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-3458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
PARP is a nuclear enzyme with a major function in the DNA damage response. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been developed for treating tumors harboring homologous recombination repair (HRR) defects that lead to a dependency on PARP. There are currently three PARPi approved for use in advanced prostate cancer (PCa), and several others are in clinical trials for this disease. Recent clinical trial results have reported differential efficacy based on the specific PARPi utilized as well as patient race. There is a racial disparity in PCa, where African American (AA) males are twice as likely to develop and die from the disease compared to European American (EA) males. Despite the disparity, there continues to be a lack of diversity in clinical trial cohorts for PCa. In this review, PARP nuclear functions, inhibition, and clinical relevance are explored through the lens of racial differences. This review will touch on the biological variations that have been explored thus far between AA and EA males with PCa to offer rationale for investigating PARPi response in the context of race at both the basic science and the clinical development levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moriah Cunningham
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santasusagna S, Zhu S, Jawalagatti V, Carceles-Cordon M, Ertel A, Garcia-Longarte S, Song WM, Fujiwara N, Li P, Mendizabal I, Petrylak DP, Kelly WK, Reddy EP, Wang L, Schiewer MJ, Lujambio A, Karnes J, Knudsen KE, Cordon-Cardo C, Dong H, Huang H, Carracedo A, Hoshida Y, Rodriguez-Bravo V, Domingo-Domenech J. Master Transcription Factor Reprogramming Unleashes Selective Translation Promoting Castration Resistance and Immune Evasion in Lethal Prostate Cancer. Cancer Discov 2023; 13:2584-2609. [PMID: 37676710 PMCID: PMC10714140 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Signaling rewiring allows tumors to survive therapy. Here we show that the decrease of the master regulator microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF) in lethal prostate cancer unleashes eukaryotic initiation factor 3B (eIF3B)-dependent translation reprogramming of key mRNAs conferring resistance to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and promoting immune evasion. Mechanistically, MITF represses through direct promoter binding eIF3B, which in turn regulates the translation of specific mRNAs. Genome-wide eIF3B enhanced cross-linking immunoprecipitation sequencing (eCLIP-seq) showed specialized binding to a UC-rich motif present in subsets of 5' untranslated regions. Indeed, translation of the androgen receptor and major histocompatibility complex I (MHC-I) through this motif is sensitive to eIF3B amount. Notably, pharmacologic targeting of eIF3B-dependent translation in preclinical models sensitizes prostate cancer to ADT and anti-PD-1 therapy. These findings uncover a hidden connection between transcriptional and translational rewiring promoting therapy-refractory lethal prostate cancer and provide a druggable mechanism that may transcend into effective combined therapeutic strategies. SIGNIFICANCE Our study shows that specialized eIF3B-dependent translation of specific mRNAs released upon downregulation of the master transcription factor MITF confers castration resistance and immune evasion in lethal prostate cancer. Pharmacologic targeting of this mechanism delays castration resistance and increases immune-checkpoint efficacy. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2489.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Santasusagna
- Department of Urology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Shijia Zhu
- Department of Medicine, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Vijayakumar Jawalagatti
- Department of Urology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Adam Ertel
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Saioa Garcia-Longarte
- Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences (CIC bioGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Derio, Spain
| | - Won-Min Song
- Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Tisch Cancer Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Naoto Fujiwara
- Department of Medicine, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Peiyao Li
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Isabel Mendizabal
- Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences (CIC bioGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Derio, Spain
| | - Daniel P. Petrylak
- Department of Oncology, Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - William Kevin Kelly
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - E. Premkumar Reddy
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Tisch Cancer Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Liguo Wang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Matthew J. Schiewer
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amaia Lujambio
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Tisch Cancer Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey Karnes
- Department of Urology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Carlos Cordon-Cardo
- Department of Pathology. Tisch Cancer Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Haidong Dong
- Department of Urology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Haojie Huang
- Department of Urology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Arkaitz Carracedo
- Center for Cooperative Research in Biosciences (CIC bioGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Derio, Spain
- Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
- Traslational prostate cancer Research Lab, CIC bioGUNE-Basurto, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute CIC bioGUNE, Bizkaia Technology Park, Derio, Spain
- CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain
| | - Yujin Hoshida
- Department of Medicine, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Veronica Rodriguez-Bravo
- Department of Urology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Josep Domingo-Domenech
- Department of Urology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oyer HM, Steck AR, Longen CG, Venkat S, Bayrak K, Munger EB, Fu D, Castagnino PA, Sanders CM, Tancler NA, Mai MT, Myers JP, Schiewer MJ, Chen N, Mostaghel EA, Kim FJ. Sigma1 Regulates Lipid Droplet-mediated Redox Homeostasis Required for Prostate Cancer Proliferation. Cancer Res Commun 2023; 3:2195-2210. [PMID: 37874216 PMCID: PMC10615122 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-22-0371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Lipid droplets (LD) are dynamic organelles that serve as hubs of cellular metabolic processes. Emerging evidence shows that LDs also play a critical role in maintaining redox homeostasis and can mitigate lipid oxidative stress. In multiple cancers, including prostate cancer, LD accumulation is associated with cancer aggressiveness, therapy resistance, and poor clinical outcome. Prostate cancer arises as an androgen receptor (AR)-driven disease. Among its myriad roles, AR mediates the biosynthesis of LDs, induces autophagy, and modulates cellular oxidative stress in a tightly regulated cycle that promotes cell proliferation. The factors regulating the interplay of these metabolic processes downstream of AR remain unclear. Here, we show that Sigma1/SIGMAR1, a unique ligand-operated scaffolding protein, regulates LD metabolism in prostate cancer cells. Sigma1 inhibition triggers lipophagy, an LD selective form of autophagy, to prevent accumulation of LDs which normally act to sequester toxic levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This disrupts the interplay between LDs, autophagy, buffering of oxidative stress and redox homeostasis, and results in the suppression of cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Consistent with these experimental results, SIGMAR1 transcripts are strongly associated with lipid metabolism and ROS pathways in prostate tumors. Altogether, these data reveal a novel, pharmacologically responsive role for Sigma1 in regulating the redox homeostasis required by oncogenic metabolic programs that drive prostate cancer proliferation. SIGNIFICANCE To proliferate, cancer cells must maintain productive metabolic and oxidative stress (eustress) while mitigating destructive, uncontrolled oxidative stress (distress). LDs are metabolic hubs that enable adaptive responses to promote eustress. Targeting the unique Sigma1 protein can trigger distress by disrupting the LD-mediated homeostasis required for proliferation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halley M. Oyer
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexandra R. Steck
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles G. Longen
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sanjana Venkat
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Konuralp Bayrak
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eleanor B. Munger
- Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Dan Fu
- Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paola A. Castagnino
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christina M. Sanders
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathalia A. Tancler
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - My T. Mai
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Justin P. Myers
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J. Schiewer
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nan Chen
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elahe A. Mostaghel
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Felix J. Kim
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gordon N, Gallagher PT, Neupane NP, Mandigo AC, McCann JK, Dylgjeri E, Vasilevskaya I, McNair C, Paller CJ, Kelly WK, Knudsen KE, Shafi AA, Schiewer MJ. PARP inhibition and pharmacological ascorbate demonstrate synergy in castration-resistant prostate cancer. bioRxiv 2023:2023.03.23.533944. [PMID: 36993449 PMCID: PMC10055378 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.23.533944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer death for men in the United States. While organ-confined disease has reasonable expectation of cure, metastatic PCa is universally fatal upon recurrence during hormone therapy, a stage termed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Until such time as molecularly defined subtypes can be identified and targeted using precision medicine, it is necessary to investigate new therapies that may apply to the CRPC population as a whole. The administration of ascorbate, more commonly known as ascorbic acid or Vitamin C, has proved lethal to and highly selective for a variety of cancer cell types. There are several mechanisms currently under investigation to explain how ascorbate exerts anti-cancer effects. A simplified model depicts ascorbate as a pro-drug for reactive oxygen species (ROS), which accumulate intracellularly and generate DNA damage. It was therefore hypothesized that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, by inhibiting DNA damage repair, would augment the toxicity of ascorbate. Results Two distinct CRPC models were found to be sensitive to physiologically relevant doses of ascorbate. Moreover, additional studies indicate that ascorbate inhibits CRPC growth in vitro via multiple mechanisms including disruption of cellular energy dynamics and accumulation of DNA damage. Combination studies were performed in CRPC models with ascorbate in conjunction with escalating doses of three different PARP inhibitors (niraparib, olaparib, and talazoparib). The addition of ascorbate augmented the toxicity of all three PARP inhibitors and proved synergistic with olaparib in both CRPC models. Finally, the combination of olaparib and ascorbate was tested in vivo in both castrated and non-castrated models. In both cohorts, the combination treatment significantly delayed tumor growth compared to monotherapy or untreated control. Conclusions These data indicate that pharmacological ascorbate is an effective monotherapy at physiological concentrations and kills CRPC cells. Ascorbate-induced tumor cell death was associated with disruption of cellular energy dynamics and accumulation of DNA damage. The addition of PARP inhibition increased the extent of DNA damage and proved effective at slowing CRPC growth both in vitro and in vivo. These findings nominate ascorbate and PARPi as a novel therapeutic regimen that has the potential to improve CRPC patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Gordon
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Peter T. Gallagher
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | | | - Amy C. Mandigo
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Jennifer K. McCann
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Irina Vasilevskaya
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Christopher McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Channing J. Paller
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Wm. Kevin Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
- Department of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Ayesha A. Shafi
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
- Center for Prostate Disease Research, Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA. The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Matthew J. Schiewer
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
- Department of Pharmacology/Physiology/Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
- Department of Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dhital B, Santasusagna S, Kirthika P, Xu M, Li P, Carceles-Cordon M, Soni RK, Li Z, Hendrickson RC, Schiewer MJ, Kelly WK, Sternberg CN, Luo J, Lujambio A, Cordon-Cardo C, Alvarez-Fernandez M, Malumbres M, Huang H, Ertel A, Domingo-Domenech J, Rodriguez-Bravo V. Harnessing transcriptionally driven chromosomal instability adaptation to target therapy-refractory lethal prostate cancer. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:100937. [PMID: 36787737 PMCID: PMC9975292 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) inevitably acquires resistance to standard therapy preceding lethality. Here, we unveil a chromosomal instability (CIN) tolerance mechanism as a therapeutic vulnerability of therapy-refractory lethal PCa. Through genomic and transcriptomic analysis of patient datasets, we find that castration and chemotherapy-resistant tumors display the highest CIN and mitotic kinase levels. Functional genomics screening coupled with quantitative phosphoproteomics identify MASTL kinase as a survival vulnerability specific of chemotherapy-resistant PCa cells. Mechanistically, MASTL upregulation is driven by transcriptional rewiring mechanisms involving the non-canonical transcription factors androgen receptor splice variant 7 and E2F7 in a circuitry that restrains deleterious CIN and prevents cell death selectively in metastatic therapy-resistant PCa cells. Notably, MASTL pharmacological inhibition re-sensitizes tumors to standard therapy and improves survival of pre-clinical models. These results uncover a targetable mechanism promoting high CIN adaptation and survival of lethal PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittiny Dhital
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Urology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Sandra Santasusagna
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Urology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Perumalraja Kirthika
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Urology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Michael Xu
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Peiyao Li
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | | | - Rajesh K Soni
- Microchemistry and Proteomics Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Zhuoning Li
- Microchemistry and Proteomics Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Ronald C Hendrickson
- Microchemistry and Proteomics Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - William K Kelly
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Department of Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Jun Luo
- Urology Department, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Amaia Lujambio
- Oncological Sciences Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Carlos Cordon-Cardo
- Pathology Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Monica Alvarez-Fernandez
- Head & Neck Cancer Department, Institute de Investigación Sanitaria Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Institute Universitario de Oncología Principado de Asturias (IUOPA), 33011 Oviedo, Spain
| | - Marcos Malumbres
- Cell Division & Cancer Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain; Cancer Cell Cycle group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), 08035 Barcelona, Spain. Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Haojie Huang
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Urology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Adam Ertel
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Josep Domingo-Domenech
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Urology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Veronica Rodriguez-Bravo
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Urology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dylgjeri E, Kothari V, Shafi AA, Semenova G, Gallagher PT, Guan YF, Pang A, Goodwin JF, Irani S, McCann JJ, Mandigo AC, Chand S, McNair CM, Vasilevskaya I, Schiewer MJ, Lallas CD, McCue PA, Gomella LG, Seifert EL, Carroll JS, Butler LM, Holst J, Kelly WK, Knudsen KE. A Novel Role for DNA-PK in Metabolism by Regulating Glycolysis in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1446-1459. [PMID: 35078861 PMCID: PMC9365345 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs, herein referred as DNA-PK) is a multifunctional kinase of high cancer relevance. DNA-PK is deregulated in multiple tumor types, including prostate cancer, and is associated with poor outcomes. DNA-PK was previously nominated as a therapeutic target and DNA-PK inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical investigation. Although DNA-PK is well studied in DNA repair and transcriptional regulation, much remains to be understood about the way by which DNA-PK drives aggressive disease phenotypes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Here, unbiased proteomic and metabolomic approaches in clinically relevant tumor models uncovered a novel role of DNA-PK in metabolic regulation of cancer progression. DNA-PK regulation of metabolism was interrogated using pharmacologic and genetic perturbation using in vitro cell models, in vivo xenografts, and ex vivo in patient-derived explants (PDE). RESULTS Key findings reveal: (i) the first-in-field DNA-PK protein interactome; (ii) numerous DNA-PK novel partners involved in glycolysis; (iii) DNA-PK interacts with, phosphorylates (in vitro), and increases the enzymatic activity of glycolytic enzymes ALDOA and PKM2; (iv) DNA-PK drives synthesis of glucose-derived pyruvate and lactate; (v) DNA-PK regulates glycolysis in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo; and (vi) combination of DNA-PK inhibitor with glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose leads to additive anti-proliferative effects in aggressive disease. CONCLUSIONS Findings herein unveil novel DNA-PK partners, substrates, and function in prostate cancer. DNA-PK impacts glycolysis through direct interaction with glycolytic enzymes and modulation of enzymatic activity. These events support energy production that may contribute to generation and/or maintenance of DNA-PK-mediated aggressive disease phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vishal Kothari
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ayesha A. Shafi
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Galina Semenova
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter T. Gallagher
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yi F. Guan
- School of Medical Sciences and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Angel Pang
- School of Medical Sciences and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan F. Goodwin
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Swati Irani
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School and Freemasons Foundation Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Jennifer J. McCann
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amy C. Mandigo
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Saswati Chand
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher M. McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Irina Vasilevskaya
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J. Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter A. McCue
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Erin L. Seifert
- Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology and MitoCare Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason S. Carroll
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, England, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa M. Butler
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School and Freemasons Foundation Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Jeff Holst
- School of Medical Sciences and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - William K. Kelly
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mandigo AC, Shafi AA, McCann JJ, Yuan W, Laufer TS, Bogdan D, Gallagher L, Dylgjeri E, Semenova G, Vasilevskaya IA, Schiewer MJ, McNair CM, de Bono JS, Knudsen KE. Novel Oncogenic Transcription Factor Cooperation in RB-Deficient Cancer. Cancer Res 2022; 82:221-234. [PMID: 34625422 PMCID: PMC9397633 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-1159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) is a critical regulator of E2F-dependent transcription, controlling a multitude of protumorigenic networks including but not limited to cell-cycle control. Here, genome-wide assessment of E2F1 function after RB loss in isogenic models of prostate cancer revealed unexpected repositioning and cooperation with oncogenic transcription factors, including the major driver of disease progression, the androgen receptor (AR). Further investigation revealed that observed AR/E2F1 cooperation elicited novel transcriptional networks that promote cancer phenotypes, especially as related to evasion of cell death. These observations were reflected in assessment of human disease, indicating the clinical relevance of the AR/E2F1 cooperome in prostate cancer. Together, these studies reveal new mechanisms by which RB loss induces cancer progression and highlight the importance of understanding the targets of E2F1 function. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies that RB loss in prostate cancer drives cooperation between AR and E2F1 as coregulators of transcription, which is linked to the progression of advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C Mandigo
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ayesha A Shafi
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer J McCann
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Wei Yuan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Talya S Laufer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Denisa Bogdan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lewis Gallagher
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Galina Semenova
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Irina A Vasilevskaya
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chris M McNair
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McCann JJ, Vasilevskaya IA, McNair C, Gallagher P, Neupane NP, de Leeuw R, Shafi AA, Dylgjeri E, Mandigo AC, Schiewer MJ, Knudsen KE. Mutant p53 elicits context-dependent pro-tumorigenic phenotypes. Oncogene 2022; 41:444-458. [PMID: 34773073 PMCID: PMC8755525 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-021-01903-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The tumor suppressor gene TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in numerous cancer types, including prostate cancer (PCa). Specifically, missense mutations in TP53 are selectively enriched in PCa, and cluster to particular "hot spots" in the p53 DNA binding domain with mutation at the R273 residue occurring most frequently. While this residue is similarly mutated to R273C-p53 or R273H-p53 in all cancer types examined, in PCa selective enrichment of R273C-p53 is observed. Importantly, examination of clinical datasets indicated that TP53 heterozygosity can either be maintained or loss of heterozygosity (LOH) occurs. Thus, to mimic tumor-associated mutant p53, R273C-p53 and R273H-p53 isogenic PCa models were developed in the presence or absence of wild-type p53. In the absence of wild-type p53, both R273C-p53 and R273H-p53 exhibited similar loss of DNA binding, transcriptional profiles, and loss of canonical tumor suppressor functions associated with wild-type p53. In the presence of wild-type p53 expression, both R273C-p53 and R273H-p53 supported canonical p53 target gene expression yet elicited distinct cistromic and transcriptional profiles when compared to each other. Moreover, heterozygous modeling of R273C-p53 or R273H-p53 expression resulted in distinct phenotypic outcomes in vitro and in vivo. Thus, mutant p53 acts in a context-dependent manner to elicit pro-tumorigenic transcriptional profiles, providing critical insight into mutant p53-mediated prostate cancer progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J. McCann
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Irina A. Vasilevskaya
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Christopher McNair
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Peter Gallagher
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Neermala Poudel Neupane
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Renée de Leeuw
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Ayesha A. Shafi
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Emanuela Dylgjeri
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Amy C. Mandigo
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Matthew J. Schiewer
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- grid.265008.90000 0001 2166 5843Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Androgen receptor function, tumor cell plasticity, loss of tumor suppressors, and defects in DNA repair genes affect aggressive features of prostate cancer. Prostate cancer development, progression, and aggressive behavior are often attributable to function of the androgen receptor. Tumor cell plasticity, neuroendocrine features, and loss of tumor suppressors lend aggressive behavior to prostate cancer cells. DNA repair defects have ramifications for prostate cancer cell behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Laboratory, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 804, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Urology Research Laboratory, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 804, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 1050, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 1050, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 1050, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 South 10th Street BLSB 1050, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. https://twitter.com/SKCCDirector
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mandigo AC, Yuan W, Xu K, Gallagher P, Pang A, Guan YF, Shafi AA, Thangavel C, Sheehan B, Bogdan D, Paschalis A, McCann JJ, Laufer TS, Gordon N, Vasilevskaya IA, Dylgjeri E, Chand SN, Schiewer MJ, Domingo-Domenech J, Den RB, Holst J, McCue PA, de Bono JS, McNair C, Knudsen KE. RB/E2F1 as a Master Regulator of Cancer Cell Metabolism in Advanced Disease. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:2334-2353. [PMID: 33879449 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Loss of the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor protein is a critical step in reprogramming biological networks that drive cancer progression, although mechanistic insight has been largely limited to the impact of RB loss on cell-cycle regulation. Here, isogenic modeling of RB loss identified disease stage-specific rewiring of E2F1 function, providing the first-in-field mapping of the E2F1 cistrome and transcriptome after RB loss across disease progression. Biochemical and functional assessment using both in vitro and in vivo models identified an unexpected, prominent role for E2F1 in regulation of redox metabolism after RB loss, driving an increase in the synthesis of the antioxidant glutathione, specific to advanced disease. These E2F1-dependent events resulted in protection from reactive oxygen species in response to therapeutic intervention. On balance, these findings reveal novel pathways through which RB loss promotes cancer progression and highlight potentially new nodes of intervention for treating RB-deficient cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: This study identifies stage-specific consequences of RB loss across cancer progression that have a direct impact on tumor response to clinically utilized therapeutics. The study herein is the first to investigate the effect of RB loss on global metabolic regulation and link RB/E2F1 to redox control in multiple advanced diseases.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2113.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C Mandigo
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Wei Yuan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kexin Xu
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Peter Gallagher
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Angel Pang
- School of Medical Sciences and Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yi Fang Guan
- School of Medical Sciences and Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ayesha A Shafi
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chellappagounder Thangavel
- Departments of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Dermatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Beshara Sheehan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Denisa Bogdan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alec Paschalis
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer J McCann
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Talya S Laufer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicolas Gordon
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Irina A Vasilevskaya
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Saswati N Chand
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Robert B Den
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Departments of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeff Holst
- Department of Dermatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter A McCue
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. .,Departments of Urology, Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Welti J, Sharp A, Brooks N, Yuan W, McNair C, Chand SN, Pal A, Figueiredo I, Riisnaes R, Gurel B, Rekowski J, Bogdan D, West W, Young B, Raja M, Prosser A, Lane J, Thomson S, Worthington J, Onions S, Shannon J, Paoletta S, Brown R, Smyth D, Harbottle GW, Gil VS, Miranda S, Crespo M, Ferreira A, Pereira R, Tunariu N, Carreira S, Neeb AJ, Ning J, Swain A, Taddei D, Schiewer MJ, Knudsen KE, Pegg N, de Bono JS. Targeting the p300/CBP Axis in Lethal Prostate Cancer. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:1118-1137. [PMID: 33431496 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Resistance to androgen receptor (AR) blockade in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is associated with sustained AR signaling, including through alternative splicing of AR (AR-SV). Inhibitors of transcriptional coactivators that regulate AR activity, including the paralog histone acetyltransferase proteins p300 and CBP, are attractive therapeutic targets for lethal prostate cancer. Herein, we validate targeting p300/CBP as a therapeutic strategy for lethal prostate cancer and describe CCS1477, a novel small-molecule inhibitor of the p300/CBP conserved bromodomain. We show that CCS1477 inhibits cell proliferation in prostate cancer cell lines and decreases AR- and C-MYC-regulated gene expression. In AR-SV-driven models, CCS1477 has antitumor activity, regulating AR and C-MYC signaling. Early clinical studies suggest that CCS1477 modulates KLK3 blood levels and regulates CRPC biopsy biomarker expression. Overall, CCS1477 shows promise for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. SIGNIFICANCE: Treating CRPC remains challenging due to persistent AR signaling. Inhibiting transcriptional AR coactivators is an attractive therapeutic strategy. CCS1477, an inhibitor of p300/CBP, inhibits growth and AR activity in CRPC models, and can affect metastatic CRPC target expression in serial clinical biopsies.See related commentary by Rasool et al., p. 1011.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Welti
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Sharp
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Wei Yuan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Abhijit Pal
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ruth Riisnaes
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bora Gurel
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Rekowski
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Denisa Bogdan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Barbara Young
- Sygnature Discovery Services, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Meera Raja
- Sygnature Discovery Services, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Prosser
- Sygnature Discovery Services, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jordan Lane
- Sygnature Discovery Services, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Thomson
- Sygnature Discovery Services, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Stuart Onions
- Sygnature Discovery Services, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Richard Brown
- Sygnature Discovery Services, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Don Smyth
- Sygnature Discovery Services, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Veronica S Gil
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susana Miranda
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mateus Crespo
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Ferreira
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rita Pereira
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nina Tunariu
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Antje J Neeb
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jian Ning
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda Swain
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Taddei
- Sygnature Discovery Services, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Neil Pegg
- CellCentric Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
- The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McCann JJ, Vasilevskaya IA, Poudel Neupane N, Shafi AA, McNair C, Dylgjeri E, Mandigo AC, Schiewer MJ, Schrecengost RS, Gallagher P, Stanek TJ, McMahon SB, Berman-Booty LD, Ostrander WF, Knudsen KE. USP22 Functions as an Oncogenic Driver in Prostate Cancer by Regulating Cell Proliferation and DNA Repair. Cancer Res 2020; 80:430-443. [PMID: 31740444 PMCID: PMC7814394 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-1033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Emerging evidence indicates the deubiquitinase USP22 regulates transcriptional activation and modification of target substrates to promote pro-oncogenic phenotypes. Here, in vivo characterization of tumor-associated USP22 upregulation and unbiased interrogation of USP22-regulated functions in vitro demonstrated critical roles for USP22 in prostate cancer. Specifically, clinical datasets validated that USP22 expression is elevated in prostate cancer, and a novel murine model demonstrated a hyperproliferative phenotype with prostate-specific USP22 overexpression. Accordingly, upon overexpression or depletion of USP22, enrichment of cell-cycle and DNA repair pathways was observed in the USP22-sensitive transcriptome and ubiquitylome using prostate cancer models of clinical relevance. Depletion of USP22 sensitized cells to genotoxic insult, and the role of USP22 in response to genotoxic insult was further confirmed using mouse adult fibroblasts from the novel murine model of USP22 expression. As it was hypothesized that USP22 deubiquitylates target substrates to promote protumorigenic phenotypes, analysis of the USP22-sensitive ubiquitylome identified the nucleotide excision repair protein, XPC, as a critical mediator of the USP22-mediated response to genotoxic insult. Thus, XPC undergoes deubiquitylation as a result of USP22 function and promotes USP22-mediated survival to DNA damage. Combined, these findings reveal unexpected functions of USP22 as a driver of protumorigenic phenotypes and have significant implications for the role of USP22 in therapeutic outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: The studies herein present a novel mouse model of tumor-associated USP22 overexpression and implicate USP22 in modulation of cellular survival and DNA repair, in part through regulation of XPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J McCann
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Irina A Vasilevskaya
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Ayesha A Shafi
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amy C Mandigo
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Randy S Schrecengost
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter Gallagher
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Timothy J Stanek
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven B McMahon
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lisa D Berman-Booty
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William F Ostrander
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dylgjeri E, McNair C, Goodwin JF, Raymon HK, McCue PA, Shafi AA, Leiby BE, de Leeuw R, Kothari V, McCann JJ, Mandigo AC, Chand SN, Schiewer MJ, Brand LJ, Vasilevskaya I, Gordon N, Laufer TS, Gomella LG, Lallas CD, Trabulsi EJ, Feng FY, Filvaroff EH, Hege K, Rathkopf D, Knudsen KE. Pleiotropic Impact of DNA-PK in Cancer and Implications for Therapeutic Strategies. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:5623-5637. [PMID: 31266833 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PK) is a pleiotropic kinase involved in DNA repair and transcriptional regulation. DNA-PK is deregulated in selected cancer types and is strongly associated with poor outcome. The underlying mechanisms by which DNA-PK promotes aggressive tumor phenotypes are not well understood. Here, unbiased molecular investigation in clinically relevant tumor models reveals novel functions of DNA-PK in cancer.Experimental Design: DNA-PK function was modulated using both genetic and pharmacologic methods in a series of in vitro models, in vivo xenografts, and patient-derived explants (PDE), and the impact on the downstream signaling and cellular cancer phenotypes was discerned. Data obtained were used to develop novel strategies for combinatorial targeting of DNA-PK and hormone signaling pathways. RESULTS Key findings reveal that (i) DNA-PK regulates tumor cell proliferation; (ii) pharmacologic targeting of DNA-PK suppresses tumor growth both in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo; (iii) DNA-PK transcriptionally regulates the known DNA-PK-mediated functions as well as novel cancer-related pathways that promote tumor growth; (iv) dual targeting of DNA-PK/TOR kinase (TORK) transcriptionally upregulates androgen signaling, which can be mitigated using the androgen receptor (AR) antagonist enzalutamide; (v) cotargeting AR and DNA-PK/TORK leads to the expansion of antitumor effects, uncovering the modulation of novel, highly relevant protumorigenic cancer pathways; and (viii) cotargeting DNA-PK/TORK and AR has cooperative growth inhibitory effects in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS These findings uncovered novel DNA-PK transcriptional regulatory functions and led to the development of a combinatorial therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced prostate cancer, currently being tested in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonathan F Goodwin
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Peter A McCue
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ayesha A Shafi
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Benjamin E Leiby
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Renée de Leeuw
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vishal Kothari
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer J McCann
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Amy C Mandigo
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Saswati N Chand
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lucas J Brand
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Irina Vasilevskaya
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicolas Gordon
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Talya S Laufer
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Costas D Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Edouard J Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Dana Rathkopf
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. .,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mandigo AC, McNair C, Schiewer MJ, Knudsen KE. Abstract 5217: RB loss reprograms AR and E2F1 signaling in models of prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-5217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed non-cutaneous malignancy, and the third leading cause of cancer death in males in the United States. A crucial component to the development and progression of PCa is the activity of the androgen receptor (AR). As such, targeting the AR-signaling axis through androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the first line of therapy for PCa. However, cells invariably become resistant to this therapy and men relapse with the incurable form of the disease termed, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). In addition to AR, another principal component aiding in the progression of disease is the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB). RB functions to repress tumor development by negatively regulating the activity of the E2F family of transcription factors, preventing cell cycle progression. RB is lost in roughly 30% of CRPC tumors and is sufficient to induce a CRPC phenotype in hormone-sensitive cells under ADT conditions. Analyses into the molecular significance of RB loss on disease progression identified a potential cooperation between AR and the RB-E2F1 signaling axis. Biological assessment performed in isogenic RB knockdown (i.e. hormone-sensitive and CRPC models) identified distinct functional consequences of RB loss depending on AR status and disease state. Transcriptome analysis identified divergently regulated gene signatures between disease stages in the presence of AR activation, which were not seen under ADT conditions, implicating a unique role of AR in transcriptional regulation with the loss of RB. Data to be discussed will also include further comparison of the E2F1 and AR cistromes in the absence of RB to identify the mechanism by which the AR-RB-E2F1 signaling axis function in promoting the progression of disease.
Citation Format: Amy C. Mandigo, Chris McNair, Matthew J. Schiewer, Karen E. Knudsen. RB loss reprograms AR and E2F1 signaling in models of prostate cancer progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5217.
Collapse
|
15
|
Shafi AA, Schiewer MJ, Leeuw RD, Dylgjeri E, McCue PA, Shah N, Gomella L, Lallas C, Trabulsi E, Centerera M, Hickey T, Butler L, Raj G, Tilley W, Cukierman E, Knudsen KE. Abstract 112: Patient derived models reveal impact of the tumor microenvironment on therapeutic response. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutanenous cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in American men. Androgen receptor (AR) is a hormone-activated transcription factor that plays an important role in both the development and progression of PCa. Androgen deprivation therapy is a common first-line therapy for disseminated disease. However, virtually all tumors become resistant to such therapy and the tumor recurs. Thus, there is a vital need for the development of novel, more effective drugs. One major hurdle in this aspect is the lack of adequate preclinical models. Current models do not effectively recapitulate the heterogeneity and the microenvironment of human PCa tumors, significantly hindering the ability to accurately predict therapeutic response. Our collaborative group has utilized and characterized a method to culture patient tumors ex vivo, termed Patient Derived Explant (PDE). This approach maintains the integrity of the native tumor microenvironment, tumor tissue morphology, and molecular signaling. Importantly, our PDE model can be manipulated both chemically (drugs/compounds) and genetically (shRNA) in order to determine specific reactions and mechanisms of response on individual tumor growth. Furthermore, with this model we can quantitatively assess drug efficacy on numerous parameters (i.e. AR levels, Ki67 staining, apoptosis screening, and desmoplasmic indices). Data to be discussed will assess the variances in response to AR-directed therapeutics and underlying mechanisms of action, while also utilizing TME characteristics as a means to predict response to therapy. In addition, we can potentially identify clinically relevant subpopulations of patients and molecularly profile their cultured tissue to uncover new pathways for therapeutic intervention. Thus, the PDE model allows for a comprehensive evaluation of individual tumors in their native microenvironment to ultimately develop more effective therapies. This study will have transformative clinical impact discerning novel metrics for the inclusion of precision medicine for advanced PCa.
Citation Format: Ayesha A. Shafi, Matthew J. Schiewer, Renée de Leeuw, Emanuela Dylgjeri, Peter A. McCue, Neelima Shah, Leonard Gomella, Costas Lallas, Edouard Trabulsi, Margaret Centerera, Theresa Hickey, Lisa Butler, Ganesh Raj, Wayne Tilley, Edna Cukierman, Karen E. Knudsen. Patient derived models reveal impact of the tumor microenvironment on therapeutic response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 112.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ganesh Raj
- 4University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) remains a significant health concern. Although localized PCa can be effectively treated, disseminated disease remains uniformly fatal. PCa is reliant on androgen receptor (AR); as such, first-line therapy for metastatic PCa entails suppression of AR signaling. Although initially effective, recurrent tumors reactivate AR function, leading to a lethal stage of disease termed castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). Recent findings implicate AR signaling in control of DNA repair and show that alterations in DNA damage repair pathways are strongly associated with disease progression and poor outcome. This review will address the DNA repair alterations observed in the clinical setting, explore the anticipated molecular and cellular consequence of DNA repair dysfunction, and consider clinical strategies for targeting tumors with altered DNA repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,19107.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,19107.,Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.,Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.,The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schiewer MJ, Mandigo AC, Gordon N, Huang F, Gaur S, de Leeuw R, Zhao SG, Evans J, Han S, Parsons T, Birbe R, McCue P, McNair C, Chand SN, Cendon-Florez Y, Gallagher P, McCann JJ, Poudel Neupane N, Shafi AA, Dylgjeri E, Brand LJ, Visakorpi T, Raj GV, Lallas CD, Trabulsi EJ, Gomella LG, Dicker AP, Kelly WK, Leiby BE, Knudsen B, Feng FY, Knudsen KE. PARP-1 regulates DNA repair factor availability. EMBO Mol Med 2018; 10:e8816. [PMID: 30467127 PMCID: PMC6284389 DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201708816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PARP-1 holds major functions on chromatin, DNA damage repair and transcriptional regulation, both of which are relevant in the context of cancer. Here, unbiased transcriptional profiling revealed the downstream transcriptional profile of PARP-1 enzymatic activity. Further investigation of the PARP-1-regulated transcriptome and secondary strategies for assessing PARP-1 activity in patient tissues revealed that PARP-1 activity was unexpectedly enriched as a function of disease progression and was associated with poor outcome independent of DNA double-strand breaks, suggesting that enhanced PARP-1 activity may promote aggressive phenotypes. Mechanistic investigation revealed that active PARP-1 served to enhance E2F1 transcription factor activity, and specifically promoted E2F1-mediated induction of DNA repair factors involved in homologous recombination (HR). Conversely, PARP-1 inhibition reduced HR factor availability and thus acted to induce or enhance "BRCA-ness". These observations bring new understanding of PARP-1 function in cancer and have significant ramifications on predicting PARP-1 inhibitor function in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy C Mandigo
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nicolas Gordon
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Renée de Leeuw
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shuang G Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Joseph Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sumin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Theodore Parsons
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ruth Birbe
- Cooper University Health, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Peter McCue
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Saswati N Chand
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ylenia Cendon-Florez
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter Gallagher
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer J McCann
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Neermala Poudel Neupane
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ayesha A Shafi
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lucas J Brand
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Costas D Lallas
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Edouard J Trabulsi
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wm Kevin Kelly
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin E Leiby
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Felix Y Feng
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
de Leeuw R, McNair C, Schiewer MJ, Neupane NP, Brand LJ, Augello MA, Li Z, Cheng LC, Yoshida A, Courtney SM, Hazard ES, Hardiman G, Hussain MH, Diehl JA, Drake JM, Kelly WK, Knudsen KE. MAPK Reliance via Acquired CDK4/6 Inhibitor Resistance in Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:4201-4214. [PMID: 29739788 PMCID: PMC6125187 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 04/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Loss of cell-cycle control is a hallmark of cancer, which can be targeted with agents, including cyclin-dependent kinase-4/6 (CDK4/6) kinase inhibitors that impinge upon the G1-S cell-cycle checkpoint via maintaining activity of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB). This class of drugs is under clinical investigation for various solid tumor types and has recently been FDA-approved for treatment of breast cancer. However, development of therapeutic resistance is not uncommon.Experimental Design: In this study, palbociclib (a CDK4/6 inhibitor) resistance was established in models of early stage, RB-positive cancer.Results: This study demonstrates that acquired palbociclib resistance renders cancer cells broadly resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Acquired resistance was associated with aggressive in vitro and in vivo phenotypes, including proliferation, migration, and invasion. Integration of RNA sequencing analysis and phosphoproteomics profiling revealed rewiring of the kinome, with a strong enrichment for enhanced MAPK signaling across all resistance models, which resulted in aggressive in vitro and in vivo phenotypes and prometastatic signaling. However, CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant models were sensitized to MEK inhibitors, revealing reliance on active MAPK signaling to promote tumor cell growth and invasion.Conclusions: In sum, these studies identify MAPK reliance in acquired CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance that promotes aggressive disease, while nominating MEK inhibition as putative novel therapeutic strategy to treat or prevent CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 24(17); 4201-14. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée de Leeuw
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Lucas J Brand
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael A Augello
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhen Li
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Larry C Cheng
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
- Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey
- Graduate Program in Quantitative Biomedicine, School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - Akihiro Yoshida
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Sean M Courtney
- Center for Genomic Medicine Bioinformatics, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - E Starr Hazard
- Center for Genomic Medicine Bioinformatics, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina
- Library Science and Informatics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Gary Hardiman
- Center for Genomic Medicine Bioinformatics, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Maha H Hussain
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - J Alan Diehl
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Justin M Drake
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
- Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey
- Graduate Program in Quantitative Biomedicine, School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Wm Kevin Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Urology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Urology and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferon University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Centenera MM, Hickey TE, Jindal S, Ryan NK, Ravindranathan P, Mohammed H, Robinson JL, Schiewer MJ, Ma S, Kapur P, Sutherland PD, Hoffmann CE, Roehrborn CG, Gomella LG, Carroll JS, Birrell SN, Knudsen KE, Raj GV, Butler LM, Tilley WD. A patient-derived explant (PDE) model of hormone-dependent cancer. Mol Oncol 2018; 12:1608-1622. [PMID: 30117261 PMCID: PMC6120230 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Revised: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast and prostate cancer research to date has largely been predicated on the use of cell lines in vitro or in vivo. These limitations have led to the development of more clinically relevant models, such as organoids or murine xenografts that utilize patient-derived material; however, issues related to low take rate, long duration of establishment, and the associated costs constrain use of these models. This study demonstrates that ex vivo culture of freshly resected breast and prostate tumor specimens obtained from surgery, termed patient-derived explants (PDEs), provides a high-throughput and cost-effective model that retains the native tissue architecture, microenvironment, cell viability, and key oncogenic drivers. The PDE model provides a unique approach for direct evaluation of drug responses on an individual patient's tumor, which is amenable to analysis using contemporary genomic technologies. The ability to rapidly evaluate drug efficacy in patient-derived material has high potential to facilitate implementation of personalized medicine approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret M. Centenera
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's HealthAdelaide Medical SchoolUniversity of AdelaideSAAustralia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteAdelaideSAAustralia
| | - Theresa E. Hickey
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research LaboratoriesAdelaide Medical SchoolUniversity of AdelaideSAAustralia
| | - Shalini Jindal
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research LaboratoriesAdelaide Medical SchoolUniversity of AdelaideSAAustralia
| | - Natalie K. Ryan
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's HealthAdelaide Medical SchoolUniversity of AdelaideSAAustralia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteAdelaideSAAustralia
| | | | - Hisham Mohammed
- Knight Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research CenterOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandORUSA
| | - Jessica L. Robinson
- Transcription Factor LaboratoryCancer Research UKCambridge InstituteCambridge UniversityUK
| | | | - Shihong Ma
- Department of UrologyUT Southwestern Medical Center at DallasTXUSA
| | - Payal Kapur
- Department of UrologyUT Southwestern Medical Center at DallasTXUSA
| | | | - Clive E. Hoffmann
- Breast ClinicBurnside War Memorial HospitalToorak GardensSAAustralia
| | | | | | - Jason S. Carroll
- Transcription Factor LaboratoryCancer Research UKCambridge InstituteCambridge UniversityUK
| | | | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Kimmel Cancer CenterThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Ganesh V. Raj
- Department of UrologyUT Southwestern Medical Center at DallasTXUSA
| | - Lisa M. Butler
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's HealthAdelaide Medical SchoolUniversity of AdelaideSAAustralia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteAdelaideSAAustralia
| | - Wayne D. Tilley
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's HealthAdelaide Medical SchoolUniversity of AdelaideSAAustralia
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research LaboratoriesAdelaide Medical SchoolUniversity of AdelaideSAAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schiewer MJ, Mandigo A, Gordon N, Huang F, Gaur S, Zhao G, Evans J, Han S, Parsons T, Birbe R, McCue P, Visakorpi T, Raj G, Rubin M, Bono JD, Lallas C, Trabulsi E, Gomella L, Dicker A, Kelly WK, Knudsen B, Feng F, Knudsen KE. Abstract B017: PARP-1 and E2F1 collaborate to transcriptionally regulate DNA repair factor availability. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.prca2017-b017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
PARP-1 holds at least four major functions on chromatin: DNA damage repair, telomeric maintenance, chromatin dynamics, and transcriptional regulation—all of which are relevant in the context of cancer. Notably, PARP-1 has been found to be a key modulator of androgen receptor (AR) function and AR-dependent phenotypes, which is a driving factor in prostate cancer (PCa) biology and therapeutic management. Recent studies indicate an unanticipated prevalence of DNA repair alterations in advanced PCa and showed that PARP-1 inhibitors (PARPi) can effectively manage a subset of these tumors. Despite the functions of PARP-1 in DNA repair having been exploited as a therapeutic target for tumors with BRCA1/2 aberrations, factors beyond DNA repair alterations clearly play a role in the response to PARPi. Notably, while DNA repair defects enrich for PARPi responders, BRCA1/2 alterations do not appear to be necessary or sufficient to induce PARPi clinical response. Given the preclinical and clinical data, pursuing a deeper understanding of the molecular underpinnings of PARPi action in PCa may yield significant benefit. Human tissue microarrays were utilized to quantify PARP-1 levels and activity as a function of PCa progression. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling in response to PARPi was performed and the PARP-1-regulated transcriptome was identified. Both the PARP-1-regulated transcriptome and PARP-1 enzymatic activity were found to be elevated as a function of PCa progression. Further interrogation of the PARP-1-regulated transcriptome revealed a major impact on E2F1-regulated genes, and chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses indicated that PARP-1 functions to regulate the chromatin architecture and E2F1 occupancy at E2F1 target gene loci. Most prominent among the E2F1-regulated genes responsive to PARPi were genes associated with DNA damage repair, with a particular enrichment for genes involved in homologous recombination (HR). In sum, these data indicate that PARP-1 regulates the function of key oncogenic transcription factors (AR and E2F1) in PCa, and part of the effect of PARPi may be through downregulation of DNA repair factors.
Citation Format: Matthew J. Schiewer, Amy Mandigo, Nicolas Gordon, Fangjin Huang, Sanchaika Gaur, George Zhao, Joseph Evans, Sumin Han, Theodore Parsons, Ruth Birbe, Peter McCue, Tapio Visakorpi, Ganesh Raj, Mark Rubin, Johann de Bono, Costas Lallas, Edouard Trabulsi, Leonard Gomella, Adam Dicker, Wm. Kevin Kelly, Beatrice Knudsen, Felix Feng, Karen E. Knudsen. PARP-1 and E2F1 collaborate to transcriptionally regulate DNA repair factor availability [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Prostate Cancer: Advances in Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research; 2017 Dec 2-5; Orlando, Florida. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(16 Suppl):Abstract nr B017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy Mandigo
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sumin Han
- 3University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI,
| | | | - Ruth Birbe
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Peter McCue
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | | | | | | | - Johann de Bono
- 7Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom,
| | | | | | | | - Adam Dicker
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Leeuw RD, McNair CM, Schiewer MJ, Neupane NP, Augello MA, Li Z, Cheng L, Yoshida A, Diehl JA, Hazard ES, McCourtney SM, Hardiman G, Hussain MH, Drake JM, Kelly WK, Knudsen KE. Abstract A043: Bypass kinase pathways lead to acquired CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.prca2017-a043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Cyclin dependent kinase-4/6 (CDK4/6) kinase inhibitors have shown clinical benefit in treatment of solid tumor types, including breast cancer. However, resistance is common, and the underpinning mechanisms of action are not well understood. Given the dependence of CDK4/6 inhibitors on retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) function for activity, this class of agents may be particularly effective in tumor types for which RB loss is infrequent or occurs late in tumor progression. Here, models of acquired palbociclib resistance were generated in early-stage, RB-positive cancers, wherein it was shown that acquired palbociclib resistance resulted in cross-resistance to other CDK4/6 inhibitors under clinical testing. Furthermore, cells showing acquired resistance exhibited aggressive in vitro and in vivo phenotypes without genetic loss of RB or RB pathway members, including enhanced proliferative capacity, migratory potential, and characteristics of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Further analyses through integration of RNA sequencing and phospho-proteomics identified activation of the MAPK signaling pathway as a mediator of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance, capable of bypassing CDK4/6 activity. However, this altered kinase dependence resulted in sensitization to MEK inhibitors, suggestive of new clinical opportunities in CDK4/6-resistant tumors. In sum, the studies herein not only identify activation of the MAPK pathway as capable of bypassing the CDK4/6 requirement and promoting aggressive tumor characteristics, but also nominate MEK inhibitors as potential mechanisms to treat or prevent CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance.
Citation Format: Renee de Leeuw, Christopher M. McNair, Matthew J. Schiewer, Neermala P. Neupane, Michael A. Augello, Zhen Li, Larry Cheng, Akihiro Yoshida, J. Alan Diehl, E Starr Hazard, Sean M. McCourtney, Gary Hardiman, Maha H. Hussain, Justin M. Drake, Wm. Kevin Kelly, Karen E. Knudsen. Bypass kinase pathways lead to acquired CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Prostate Cancer: Advances in Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research; 2017 Dec 2-5; Orlando, Florida. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(16 Suppl):Abstract nr A043.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhen Li
- 2Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ,
| | - Larry Cheng
- 2Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ,
| | | | - J. Alan Diehl
- 3Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,
| | | | | | - Gary Hardiman
- 3Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shafi AA, Schiewer MJ, de Leeuw R, Dylgjeri E, McCue PA, Shah N, Gomella LG, Lallas CD, Trabulsi EJ, Centenera MM, Hickey TE, Butler LM, Raj G, Tilley WD, Cukierman E, Knudsen KE. Patient-derived Models Reveal Impact of the Tumor Microenvironment on Therapeutic Response. Eur Urol Oncol 2018; 1:325-337. [PMID: 30467556 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Androgen deprivation therapy is a first-line treatment for disseminated prostate cancer (PCa). However, virtually all tumors become resistant and recur as castration-resistant PCa, which has no durable cure. One major hurdle in the development of more effective therapies is the lack of preclinical models that adequately recapitulate the heterogeneity of PCa, significantly hindering the ability to accurately predict therapeutic response. Objective To leverage the ex vivo culture method termed patient-derived explant (PDE) to examine the impact of PCa therapeutics on a patient-by-patient basis. Design setting and participants Fresh PCa tissue from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was cultured as PDEs to examine therapeutic response. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The impact of genomic and chemical perturbations in PDEs was assessed using various parameters (eg, AR levels, Ki67 staining, and desmoplastic indices). Results and limitations PDE maintained the integrity of the native tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor tissue morphology, viability, and endogenous hormone signaling. Tumor cells in this model system exhibited de novo proliferative capacity. Examination of the native TME in the PDE revealed a first-in-field insight into patient-specific desmoplastic stromal indices and predicted responsiveness to AR-directed therapeutics. Conclusions The PDE model allows for a comprehensive evaluation of individual tumors in their native TME to ultimately develop more effective therapeutic regimens tailored to individuals. Discernment of novel stromal markers may provide a basis for applying precision medicine in treating advanced PCa, which would have a transformative effect on patient outcomes. Patient summary In this study, an innovative model system was used to more effectively mimic human disease. The patient-derived explant (PDE) system can be used to predict therapeutic response and identify novel targets in advanced disease. Thus, the PDE will be an asset for the development of novel metrics for the implementation of precision medicine in prostate cancer.The patient-derived explant (PDE) model allows for a comprehensive evaluation of individual human tumors in their native tumor microenvironment (TME). TME analysis revealed first-in-field insight into predicted tumor responsiveness to AR-directed therapeutics through evaluation of patient-specific desmoplastic stromal indices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha A Shafi
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Renée de Leeuw
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter A McCue
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Neelima Shah
- Cancer Biology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Costas D Lallas
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Edouard J Trabulsi
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Margaret M Centenera
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Prostate Cancer Research Centre and Freemason's Foundation Centre for Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medician Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Theresa E Hickey
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Prostate Cancer Research Centre and Freemason's Foundation Centre for Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Lisa M Butler
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Prostate Cancer Research Centre and Freemason's Foundation Centre for Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medician Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ganesh Raj
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Wayne D Tilley
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Prostate Cancer Research Centre and Freemason's Foundation Centre for Men's Health, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Edna Cukierman
- Cancer Biology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Departments of Cancer Biology and Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hartsough EJ, Kugel CH, Vido MJ, Berger AC, Purwin TJ, Goldberg A, Davies MA, Schiewer MJ, Knudsen KE, Bollag G, Aplin AE. Response and Resistance to Paradox-Breaking BRAF Inhibitor in Melanomas In Vivo and Ex Vivo. Mol Cancer Ther 2017; 17:84-95. [PMID: 29133617 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Revised: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
FDA-approved BRAF inhibitors produce high response rates and improve overall survival in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma, but are linked to pathologies associated with paradoxical ERK1/2 activation in wild-type BRAF cells. To overcome this limitation, a next-generation paradox-breaking RAF inhibitor (PLX8394) has been designed. Here, we show that by using a quantitative reporter assay, PLX8394 rapidly suppressed ERK1/2 reporter activity and growth of mutant BRAF melanoma xenografts. Ex vivo treatment of xenografts and use of a patient-derived explant system (PDeX) revealed that PLX8394 suppressed ERK1/2 signaling and elicited apoptosis more effectively than the FDA-approved BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib. Furthermore, PLX8394 was efficacious against vemurafenib-resistant BRAF splice variant-expressing tumors and reduced splice variant homodimerization. Importantly, PLX8394 did not induce paradoxical activation of ERK1/2 in wild-type BRAF cell lines or PDeX. Continued in vivo dosing of xenografts with PLX8394 led to the development of acquired resistance via ERK1/2 reactivation through heterogeneous mechanisms; however, resistant cells were found to have differential sensitivity to ERK1/2 inhibitor. These findings highlight the efficacy of a paradox-breaking selective BRAF inhibitor and the use of PDeX system to test the efficacy of therapeutic agents. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(1); 84-95. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Hartsough
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Curtis H Kugel
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael J Vido
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam C Berger
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Timothy J Purwin
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Allison Goldberg
- Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Andrew E Aplin
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. .,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chand SN, Zarei M, Schiewer MJ, Kamath AR, Romeo C, Lal S, Cozzitorto JA, Nevler A, Scolaro L, Londin E, Jiang W, Meisner-Kober N, Pishvaian MJ, Knudsen KE, Yeo CJ, Pascal JM, Winter JM, Brody JR. Posttranscriptional Regulation of PARG mRNA by HuR Facilitates DNA Repair and Resistance to PARP Inhibitors. Cancer Res 2017; 77:5011-5025. [PMID: 28687616 PMCID: PMC5663502 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-2704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2016] [Revised: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) rely on the mRNA stability factor HuR (ELAV-L1) to drive cancer growth and progression. Here, we show that CRISPR-Cas9-mediated silencing of the HuR locus increases the relative sensitivity of PDAC cells to PARP inhibitors (PARPi). PDAC cells treated with PARPi stimulated translocation of HuR from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, specifically promoting stabilization of a new target, poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) mRNA, by binding a unique sequence embedded in its 3' untranslated region. HuR-dependent upregulation of PARG expression facilitated DNA repair via hydrolysis of polyADP-ribose on related repair proteins. Accordingly, strategies to inhibit HuR directly promoted DNA damage accumulation, inefficient PAR removal, and persistent PARP-1 residency on chromatin (PARP-1 trapping). Immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that the PARP-1 protein binds and posttranslationally modifies HuR in PARPi-treated PDAC cells. In a mouse xenograft model of human PDAC, PARPi monotherapy combined with targeted silencing of HuR significantly reduced tumor growth compared with PARPi therapy alone. Our results highlight the HuR-PARG axis as an opportunity to enhance PARPi-based therapies. Cancer Res; 77(18); 5011-25. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- Apoptosis
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology
- Cell Nucleus/drug effects
- Cell Nucleus/genetics
- Cell Proliferation
- DNA Damage/drug effects
- DNA Damage/genetics
- DNA Repair/drug effects
- DNA Repair/genetics
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics
- ELAV-Like Protein 1/antagonists & inhibitors
- ELAV-Like Protein 1/genetics
- ELAV-Like Protein 1/metabolism
- Female
- Glycoside Hydrolases/genetics
- Humans
- Mice
- Mice, Nude
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism
- Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
- Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/pharmacology
- Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/chemistry
- RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional
- RNA, Messenger/genetics
- Tumor Cells, Cultured
- Up-Regulation
- Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saswati N Chand
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mahsa Zarei
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Akshay R Kamath
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Carmella Romeo
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Shruti Lal
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph A Cozzitorto
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Avinoam Nevler
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Laura Scolaro
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric Londin
- Computational Medicine Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Michael J Pishvaian
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles J Yeo
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John M Pascal
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan M Winter
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jonathan R Brody
- Department of Surgery, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Paolillo C, Mu Z, Rossi G, Schiewer MJ, Nguyen T, Austin L, Capoluongo E, Knudsen K, Cristofanilli M, Fortina P. Detection of Activating Estrogen Receptor Gene ( ESR1) Mutations in Single Circulating Tumor Cells. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:6086-6093. [PMID: 28679775 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Early detection is essential for treatment plans before onset of metastatic disease. Our purpose was to demonstrate feasibility to detect and monitor estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene mutations at the single circulating tumor cell (CTC) level in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).Experimental Design: We used a CTC molecular characterization approach to investigate heterogeneity of 14 hotspot mutations in ESR1 and their correlation with endocrine resistance. Combining the CellSearch and DEPArray technologies allowed recovery of 71 single CTCs and 12 WBC from 3 ER-positive MBC patients. Forty CTCs and 12 WBC were subjected to whole genome amplification by MALBAC and Sanger sequencing.Results: Among 3 selected patients, 2 had an ESR1 mutation (Y537). One showed two different ESR1 variants in a single CTC and another showed loss of heterozygosity. All mutations were detected in matched cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Furthermore, one had 2 serial blood samples analyzed and showed changes in both cfDNA and CTCs with emergence of mutations in ESR1 (Y537S and T570I), which has not been reported previously.Conclusions: CTCs are easily accessible biomarkers to monitor and better personalize management of patients with previously demonstrated ER-MBC who are progressing on endocrine therapy. We showed that single CTC analysis can yield important information on clonal heterogeneity and can be a source of discovery of novel and potential driver mutations. Finally, we also validate a workflow for liquid biopsy that will facilitate early detection of ESR1 mutations, the emergence of endocrine resistance and the choice of further target therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6086-93. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmela Paolillo
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania.,Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory of Clinical Molecular and Personalized Diagnostics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Zhaomei Mu
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Giovanna Rossi
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas Nguyen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Laura Austin
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Ettore Capoluongo
- Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory of Clinical Molecular and Personalized Diagnostics, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Karen Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Paolo Fortina
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania. .,Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shafi AA, Schiewer MJ, Leeuw RD, McCue PA, Gomella LG, Lallas CD, Trabulsi EJ, Hickey T, Shah N, Cukierman E, Butler LM, Tilley W, Raj G, Knudsen KE. Abstract LB-109: PDeX (Patient Derived eXplant) models to determine the basis for response to targeted agents in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-lb-109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutanenous cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death in American men. Androgen receptor (AR) is a hormone-activated transcription factor that plays an important role in both the development and progression of PCa. Androgen deprivation therapy is a common first-line therapy for disseminated disease. However, virtually all tumors become resistant to such therapy and the tumor recurs. Thus, there is a vital need for the development of novel, more effective drugs. One major hurdle in this aspect is the lack of adequate preclinical models. Current models do not effectively recapitulate the heterogeneity and the microenvironment of human PCa tumors, significantly hindering the ability to accurately predict therapeutic response. Our collaborative group has utilized and characterized a method to culture patient tumors ex vivo, termed Patient Derived eXplant (PDeX). This approach maintains the integrity of the native tumor microenvironment, tumor tissue morphology, and molecular signaling. Importantly, our PDeX model can be manipulated both chemically (drugs/compounds) and genetically (shRNA) in order to determine specific reactions and mechanisms of response on individual tumor growth. Furthermore, with this model we can quantitatively assess drug efficacy on numerous parameters (i.e. AR levels, Ki67 staining, apoptosis screening, and desmoplasmic indices). Data to be discussed will assess the variances in response to AR-directed therapeutics and underlying mechanisms of action, while also utilizing TME characteristics as a means to predict response to therapy. In addition, we can potentially identify clinically relevant subpopulations of patients and molecularly profile their cultured tissue to uncover new pathways for therapeutic intervention. Thus, the PDeX model allows for a comprehensive evaluation of individual tumors in their native microenvironment to ultimately develop more effective therapies. This study will have transformative clinical impact discerning novel metrics for the inclusion of precision medicine for advanced PCa.
Citation Format: Ayesha A. Shafi, Matthew J. Schiewer, Renee de Leeuw, Peter A. McCue, Leonard G. Gomella, Costas D. Lallas, Edouard J. Trabulsi, Theresa Hickey, Neelima Shah, Edna Cukierman, Lisa M. Butler, Wayne Tilley, Ganesh Raj, Karen E. Knudsen. PDeX (Patient Derived eXplant) models to determine the basis for response to targeted agents in prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-109. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-109
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha A. Shafi
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Renee de Leeuw
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter A. McCue
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Neelima Shah
- 3Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Edna Cukierman
- 3Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Karen E. Knudsen
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
McCann JJ, Dean JL, Leeuw RD, Schiewer MJ, McNair CM, Knudsen KE. Abstract LB-030: Specific missense mutations in TP53 elicit contrasting biochemical and biological outcomes affecting prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-lb-030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer type and the third leading cause of cancer death in men in the United States. While organ-confined disease is manageable, treatment options for disseminated PCa remain limited. First-line therapy for metastatic PCa functions through targeting the androgen receptor (AR) signaling axis, as AR activity is required for tumor maintenance. However, while treatment is initially effective, these tumors invariably recur, displaying reactivation of AR signaling despite continued therapeutic targeting. Moreover, no durable treatment currently exists for this ultimately fatal disease stage, termed castrate-resistant PCa (CRPC). Significantly, recent high profile, genome-wide studies have revealed that missense mutations in the TP53 gene occur in nearly all cancer types, and these mutations frequently occur at specific TP53 “hotspots”. Interestingly, enrichment of certain hotspot p53 mutants specifically occurs in PCa. While the underlying causes of PCa-enriched mutations remain undefined, their presence elicits contrasting, pro-oncogenic biochemical and biological phenotypes. Unpublished data suggests that mutant p53 isoforms act in a mutation-specific fashion to drive PCa progression through alterations in the canonical activity of p53, identified through characterization of their related transcriptomes and cistromes. Biologically, these mutant p53 isoforms also confer differential proliferative and survival phenotypes. Moreover they act in a mutation-dependent fashion in response to castration therapy both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, pro-oncogenic mutant p53 appears to manipulate both conventional and novel pathways leading to PCa progression. These findings both corroborate and expand the recent findings that mutations in p53 drive cancer progression, and further suggest a critical role for p53 mutations as regulators of disease progression in PCa.
Citation Format: Jennifer J. McCann, Jeffry L. Dean, Renee De Leeuw, Matthew J. Schiewer, Christopher M. McNair, Karen E. Knudsen. Specific missense mutations in TP53 elicit contrasting biochemical and biological outcomes affecting prostate cancer progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-030. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-030
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J. McCann
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffry L. Dean
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Renee De Leeuw
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Schiewer MJ, Mandigo AC, Gordon N, Huang F, Gaur S, Zhao S, Evans J, Han S, Parsons T, Birbe R, McCue P, Visakorpi T, Raj G, Rubin M, Bono JD, Lallas C, Trabulsi E, Gomella LG, Dicker AP, Kelly K, Knudsen B, Feng F, Knudsen KE. Abstract LB-086: PARP-1 controls the DNA damage response by regulating E2F1 transcriptional activity. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-lb-086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
PARP-1 holds two major functions on chromatin, DNA damage repair and transcriptional regulation, both of which are relevant in the context of cancer. Notably, PARP-1 has been found to be a key modulator of androgen receptor (AR) function and AR-dependent phenotypes, which is a driving factor in prostate cancer (PCa) biology and therapeutic management. Recent studies indicate an unanticipated prevalence of DNA repair alterations in advanced PCa and showed that PARP-1 inhibitors (PARPi) can effectively manage of a subset of these tumors. Despite the functions of PARP-1 in DNA repair having been exploited as a therapeutic target for tumors with BRCA1/2 aberrations, factors beyond DNA repair alterations clearly play a role in the response to PARPi. Notably, in the TO-PARP trial, not all patients with DNA repair aberrations responded to PARPi; conversely, tumors lacking BRCA1/2 or other DNA repair alterations show objective response to PARPi in PCa and other tumor types. These clinical data suggest that the genetic (e.g. BRCA-ness) and pharmacologic interplay is complex in the context of PARPi. Given the preclinical and clinical data, pursuing a deeper understanding of the molecular underpinnings of PARPi action in PCa may yield significant benefit. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling in response to PARPi was performed and the PARP-1-regulated transcriptome was identified. Human tissue microarrays were utilized to quantify PARP-1 levels and activity as a function of PCa progression. Both the PARP-1-regulated transcriptome, as well as PARP-1 enzymatic activity, were found to be elevated as a function of PCa progression. Further interrogation of the PARP-1-regulated transcriptome revealed a major impact on E2F1-regulated genes, and chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses indicated that PARP-1 functions to regulate the chromatin architecture and E2F1 occupancy at E2F1 target gene loci. Most prominent among the E2F1-regulated genes responsive to PARPi were genes associated with DNA damage repair, with a particular enrichment for genes involved in homologous recombination (HR). In sum, these data indicate PARP-1 regulates the function of key oncogenic transcription factors (AR and E2F1) in PCa, and part of the effect of PARPi may be through down-regulation of DNA repair factors.
Citation Format: Matthew J. Schiewer, Amy C. Mandigo, Nicolas Gordon, Fangjin Huang, Sanchaika Gaur, Shuang Zhao, Joseph Evans, Sumin Han, Theodore Parsons, Ruth Birbe, Peter McCue, Tapio Visakorpi, Ganesh Raj, Mark Rubin, Johann de Bono, Costas Lallas, Edouard Trabulsi, Leonard G. Gomella, Adam P. Dicker, Kevin Kelly, Beatrice Knudsen, Felix Feng, Karen E. Knudsen. PARP-1 controls the DNA damage response by regulating E2F1 transcriptional activity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-086. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-086
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy C. Mandigo
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nicolas Gordon
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | - Sumin Han
- 3University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Theodore Parsons
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ruth Birbe
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter McCue
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Mark Rubin
- 6Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Johann de Bono
- 7Institute for Cancer Research, Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | - Costas Lallas
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Edouard Trabulsi
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam P. Dicker
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kevin Kelly
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Felix Feng
- 8University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mandigo AC, McNair C, Xu K, Li F, Schiewer MJ, Brown M, Knudsen KE. Abstract LB-087: Stage specific re-calibration of E2F1 function after RB loss. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-lb-087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed non-cutaneous malignancy, and the third leading cause of cancer death in males in the United States. The development of the disease is reliant on the activity of the androgen receptor (AR), which promotes proliferation and is required for cell growth and survival. Deregulation of AR leads to the progression of PCa to the incurable form of disease termed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). One of the underlying mechanisms of AR deregulation is the loss of function of the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor protein. RB loss is almost exclusively seen in CRPC and is sufficient to induce a CRPC phenotype in primary PCa models. However, RB function is only lost in roughly 30% of tumors. The remaining 70% of tumors that progress to CRPC do so via other mechanisms and retain RB function. A subset of RB positive CRPC tumors progress to lose RB function even in this post-CRPC transition stage of disease. Biological assessment performed in isogenic RB knockdown, both hormone-sensitive and CRPC models, identified distinct functional consequences of RB loss depending on disease state. Transcriptome analysis identified opposing regulated gene signatures between disease stages. Further investigation of the E2F1 cistrome revealed differential E2F1 binding with RB loss in hormone sensitive and CRPC models, identifying distinct roles of E2F1, in the absence of RB, in different disease states. Data to be discussed reveal the stage-specific molecular pathways driven by E2F1 upon RB loss with the potential to promote disease progression.
Citation Format: Amy C. Mandigo, Christopher McNair, Kexin Xu, Fugen Li, Matthew J. Schiewer, Myles Brown, Karen E. Knudsen. Stage specific re-calibration of E2F1 function after RB loss [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-087. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-087
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C. Mandigo
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher McNair
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kexin Xu
- 2University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | | | | | | | - Karen E. Knudsen
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Leeuw RD, Schiewer MJ, McNair C, Augello MA, Yoshida A, Hazard ES, Courtney S, Hardiman GT, Drake J, Feng FY, Tomlins S, Hussain MH, Diehl JA, Kelly WK, Knudsen KE. Abstract 5874: Cdk4/6 kinase inhibitor resistance in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-5874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Non-organ confined prostate cancer (PCa) is often effectively, but only transiently treated by targeting the androgen receptor (AR) signaling axis through androgen depletion strategies, often coupled with AR antagonists. Unfortunately, disease recurs within a median of 3-4 years, presenting as castration resistant PCa (CRPC), for which there are limited therapeutic options. This emphasizes the need for more efficacious drugs and a patient-tailored approach towards cancer therapy to improve disease outcome. One class of drugs currently tested clinically, Cdk4/6 kinase inhibitors, blocks phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor, thereby boosting its function, and likely preventing castration resistance. As Cdk4/6 inhibitor resistance has already been reported in other cancers, some PCa patients are anticipated to develop drug resistance. Here, we created palbociclib-resistant PCa cell models by continuously culturing them in presence of the drug to unravel mechanisms of acquired resistance, and assessed them for cross-resistance to ribociclib and response to other therapeutics. While the parental PCa cell models, Cdk4/6 inhibitors efficiently induce a G1 cell cycle arrest, the resistant cell lines bypass this cell cycle checkpoint. Although loss of RB is a known mechanism for Cdk4/6i resistance, none of the models lost RB expression. Strikingly, these originally hormone-sensitive cell lines, upon developing Cdk4/6 inhibitor resistance display altered response to selected therapeutic regimens. Mechanisms of resistance, as informed by Whole Exome Sequencing and RNASeq, will be discussed.
Citation Format: Renee de Leeuw, Matthew J. Schiewer, Christopher McNair, Michael A. Augello, Akihiro Yoshida, Edward S. Hazard, Sean Courtney, Gerard T. Hardiman, Justin Drake, Felix Y. Feng, Scott Tomlins, Maha H. Hussain, J Alan Diehl, William K. Kelly, Karen E. Knudsen. Cdk4/6 kinase inhibitor resistance in prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5874. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5874
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sean Courtney
- 2Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | | | - Felix Y. Feng
- 4University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - J Alan Diehl
- 2Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
In this issue of Cancer Cell, Hydbring and colleagues define a novel class of microRNAs (miRNAs), deemed "cell-cycle-targeting miRNAs," that target several cyclins/CDKs, reduce tumor cell growth, and induce apoptosis. These miRNAs effectively suppressed chemoresistant patient-derived xenograft growth in vivo, and efficacy could be prospectively predicted with an expression-based algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schiewer MJ, Mandigo AC, Gordon N, Han S, Zhao S, Evans J, Parsons T, Birbe R, McCue P, Visakorpi T, Raj G, Rubin M, Bono JD, Lallas C, Trabulsi E, Gomella LG, Dicker AP, Kelly WK, Feng FY, Knudsen KE. Abstract A08: PARP1-mediated E2F1 regulation of DNA repair capacity. Mol Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3125.dnarepair16-a08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
PARP1 holds two major functions on chromatin, DNA damage repair and transcriptional regulation, both of which are relevant in the context of cancer. Notably, PARP1 has been found to be a key modulator of androgen receptor (AR) function and AR-dependent phenotypes, which is a driving factor in prostate cancer (PCa) biology and therapeutic management. Recent studies indicate an unanticipated prevalence of DNA repair alterations in advanced PCa and showed that PARP1 inhibitors (PARPi) can effectively manage of a subset of these tumors. Despite the functions of PARP1 in DNA repair having been exploited as a therapeutic target for tumors with BRCA1/2 aberrations, factors beyond DNA repair alterations clearly play a role in the response to PARPi. Notably, in the TO-PARP trial, not all patients with DNA repair aberrations responded to PARPi; conversely, tumors lacking BRCA1/2 or other DNA repair alterations show objective response to PARPi in PCa and other tumor types. These clinical data suggest that the genetic (e.g. BRCA-ness) and pharmacologic interplay is complex in the context of PARPi. Given the preclinical and clinical data, pursuing a deeper understanding of the molecular underpinnings of PARPi action in PCa may yield significant benefit. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling in response to PARPi was performed and the PARP1-regulated transcriptome was identified. Both the PARP1-regulated transcriptome, as well as PARP1 enzymatic activity were found to be elevated as a function of PCa progression. Further interrogation of the PARP1-regulated transcriptome revealed a major impact on E2F1-regulated genes, and chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses indicated that PARP1 functions to regulate the chromatin architecture and E2F1 occupancy at E2F1 target gene loci. Most prominent among the E2F1-regulated genes responsive to PARPi were genes associated with DNA damage repair, with a particular enrichment for genes involved in homologous recombination (HR). In sum, these data indicate PARP1 regulates function of key oncogenic transcription factors (AR and E2F1) in PCa, and part of the effect of PARPi may be through down-regulation of DNA repair factors.
Citation Format: Matthew J. Schiewer, Amy C. Mandigo, Nicholas Gordon, Sumin Han, Shuang Zhao, Joseph Evans, Theodore Parsons, Ruth Birbe, Peter McCue, Tapio Visakorpi, Ganesh Raj, Mark Rubin, Johann de Bono, Costas Lallas, Edouard Trabulsi, Leonard G. Gomella, Adam P. Dicker, Wm. Kevin Kelly, Felix Y. Feng, Karen E. Knudsen. PARP1-mediated E2F1 regulation of DNA repair capacity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr A08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Schiewer
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Amy C. Mandigo
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Nicholas Gordon
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Sumin Han
- 2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,
| | | | - Joseph Evans
- 2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,
| | - Theodore Parsons
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Ruth Birbe
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Peter McCue
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | | | | | - Mark Rubin
- 6Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY,
| | - Johann de Bono
- 7The Institute of Cancer Research The Royal Marsden, London, United Kingdom
| | - Costas Lallas
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Edouard Trabulsi
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Adam P. Dicker
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Wm. Kevin Kelly
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- 2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- 1Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA,
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
McNair C, Urbanucci A, Comstock CES, Augello MA, Goodwin JF, Launchbury R, Zhao SG, Schiewer MJ, Ertel A, Karnes J, Davicioni E, Wang L, Wang Q, Mills IG, Feng FY, Li W, Carroll JS, Knudsen KE. Cell cycle-coupled expansion of AR activity promotes cancer progression. Oncogene 2017; 36:1655-1668. [PMID: 27669432 PMCID: PMC5364060 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The androgen receptor (AR) is required for prostate cancer (PCa) survival and progression, and ablation of AR activity is the first line of therapeutic intervention for disseminated disease. While initially effective, recurrent tumors ultimately arise for which there is no durable cure. Despite the dependence of PCa on AR activity throughout the course of disease, delineation of the AR-dependent transcriptional network that governs disease progression remains elusive, and the function of AR in mitotically active cells is not well understood. Analyzing AR activity as a function of cell cycle revealed an unexpected and highly expanded repertoire of AR-regulated gene networks in actively cycling cells. New AR functions segregated into two major clusters: those that are specific to cycling cells and retained throughout the mitotic cell cycle ('Cell Cycle Common'), versus those that were specifically enriched in a subset of cell cycle phases ('Phase Restricted'). Further analyses identified previously unrecognized AR functions in major pathways associated with clinical PCa progression. Illustrating the impact of these unmasked AR-driven pathways, dihydroceramide desaturase 1 was identified as an AR-regulated gene in mitotically active cells that promoted pro-metastatic phenotypes, and in advanced PCa proved to be highly associated with development of metastases, recurrence after therapeutic intervention and reduced overall survival. Taken together, these findings delineate AR function in mitotically active tumor cells, thus providing critical insight into the molecular basis by which AR promotes development of lethal PCa and nominate new avenues for therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - A Urbanucci
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway (NCMM), Nordic EMBL Partnership, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway
| | - C E S Comstock
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - M A Augello
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J F Goodwin
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - R Launchbury
- Cambridge Research Institute, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - S G Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - M J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - A Ertel
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J Karnes
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - L Wang
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Q Wang
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - I G Mills
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway (NCMM), Nordic EMBL Partnership, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway
- Prostate Cancer UK/Movember Centre of Excellence for Prostate Cancer Research, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - F Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Medicine and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - W Li
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J S Carroll
- Cambridge Research Institute, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - K E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Evans JR, Zhao SG, Chang SL, Tomlins SA, Erho N, Sboner A, Schiewer MJ, Spratt DE, Kothari V, Klein EA, Den RB, Dicker AP, Karnes RJ, Yu X, Nguyen PL, Rubin MA, de Bono J, Knudsen KE, Davicioni E, Feng FY. Patient-Level DNA Damage and Repair Pathway Profiles and Prognosis After Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2:471-80. [PMID: 26746117 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE A substantial number of patients diagnosed with high-risk prostate cancer are at risk for metastatic progression after primary treatment. Better biomarkers are needed to identify patients at the highest risk to guide therapy intensification. OBJECTIVE To create a DNA damage and repair (DDR) pathway profiling method for use as a prognostic signature biomarker in high-risk prostate cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cohort of 1090 patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent prostatectomy and were treated at 3 different academic institutions were divided into a training cohort (n = 545) and 3 pooled validation cohorts (n = 232, 130, and 183) assembled for case-control or case-cohort studies. Profiling of 9 DDR pathways using 17 gene sets for GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) of high-density microarray gene expression data from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostatectomy samples with median 10.3 years follow-up was performed. Prognostic signature development from DDR pathway profiles was studied, and DDR pathway gene mutation in published cohorts was analyzed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Biochemical recurrence-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival. RESULTS Across the training cohort and pooled validation cohorts, 1090 men were studied; mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 65.3 (6.4) years. We found that there are distinct clusters of DDR pathways within the cohort, and DDR pathway enrichment is only weakly correlated with clinical variables such as age (Spearman ρ [ρ], range, -0.07 to 0.24), Gleason score (ρ, range, 0.03 to 0.20), prostate-specific antigen level (ρ, range, -0.07 to 0.10), while 13 of 17 DDR gene sets are strongly correlated with androgen receptor pathway enrichment (ρ, range, 0.33 to 0.82). In published cohorts, DDR pathway genes are rarely mutated. A DDR pathway profile prognostic signature built in the training cohort was significantly associated with biochemical recurrence-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival in the pooled validation cohorts independent of standard clinicopathological variables. The prognostic performance of the signature for metastasis-free survival appears to be stronger in the younger patients (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.12-2.50) than in the older patients (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.29-2.07) on multivariate Cox analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE DNA damage and repair pathway profiling revealed patient-level variations and the DDR pathways are rarely affected by mutation. A DDR pathway signature showed strong prognostic performance with the long-term outcomes of metastasis-free and overall survival that may be useful for risk stratification of high-risk prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Shuang G Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor2Beaumont Hospital - Dearborn, Transitional Year Program, Dearborn, Michigan
| | - S Laura Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Nicholas Erho
- GenomeDx Biosciences Inc, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrea Sboner
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Vishal Kothari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Eric A Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robert B Den
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Paul L Nguyen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mark A Rubin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Johann de Bono
- Drug Development Unit and Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elai Davicioni
- GenomeDx Biosciences Inc, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor13Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor14Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chand SN, Zarei M, Kamath AR, Schiewer MJ, Romeo C, Cozzitorto JA, Meisner-Kober N, Londin E, Rigoutsos I, Knudsen K, Pascal JM, Yeo CJ, Winter JM, Brody JR. Abstract 1995: HuR dependent inhibition of PARG enhances PARP inhibitor therapy for DNA repair proficient and deficient pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-1995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Despite our deep understanding of genetic drivers of the disease, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) continues to be associated with dismal survival rates. Targeting the DNA repair machinery has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy to treat pancreatic cancer patients carrying DNA damage repair (DDR) mutations. Such mutations promote tumorigenesis, but also paradoxically render tumor cells particularly susceptible to platinum-based agents and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). However, despite promising preclinical and clinical results, early data demonstrate that eventually most tumors, regardless of DDR status, become resistant to PARPi-therapies.
The mRNA-binding protein HuR, predominantly expressed in the nucleus, translocates to the cytoplasm upon tumor-associated stress where it post-transcriptionally regulates select mRNA cargo, resulting in resistance to DNA damaging agents in a harsh tumor microenvironment. Here, we sought to evaluate the role of HuR in regulating PARPi efficacy.
Results: In response to cellular stress induced by IC50 dosages of a panel of PARPis such as Veliparib, Olaparib, Rucaparib, Talazoparib and Niraparib, nuclear localized HuR undergoes cytoplasmic translocation. Silencing of HuR via siRNA, CRISPR and a DOX-inducible system resulted in significant decrease in long and short- term PDA cell survival, irrespective of DDR status. To complement and validate in vitro findings, we employed a heterotropic mouse xenograft model using Mia.sh290 cells wherein DOX induction significantly reduced HuR expression. Olaparib mediated PARP inhibition (50mg/kg, 5 days a week) combined with DOX-induced HuR silencing resulted in significant reduction in tumor volumes, compared to Olaparib alone or DOX alone.
Mechanistically, we demonstrate that the pro-survival protein HuR facilitates PDA cells to recover from PARPi insult by, in part, regulating poly ADP ribose glycohydrolase (PARG), the major enzyme responsible for hydrolyzing poly-ADP ribose (PAR) polymers, on chromatin and associated proteins. HuR binds to two 41- 43bp long sites in the 3’ untranslated region (3’UTR) of PARG, increasing its mRNA stability and protein expression. Increased PARG activity, further validated via exogenous overexpression, promotes DNA repair efficiency and increases PDA cell survival. Functional analysis indicate that such inhibition of HuR and/or PARG significantly enhances PARPi sensitivity in PDA cells, via increased accumulation of DNA damage γH2AX foci, preventing efficient removal of PAR polymers, and enhancing detrimental trapping of PARP1 on chromatin.
Conclusions: Taken together, our results indicate that HuR- mediated upregulation of PARG acts as a universal pro-survival mechanism and HuR inhibition could significantly potentiate PARPi therapy in PDA, irrespective of DNA repair status.
Citation Format: Saswati N. Chand, Mahsa Zarei, Akshay R. Kamath, Matthew J. Schiewer, Carmella Romeo, Joseph A. Cozzitorto, Nicole Meisner- Kober, Eric Londin, Isidore Rigoutsos, Karen Knudsen, John M. Pascal, Charles J. Yeo, Jordan M. Winter, Jonathan R. Brody. HuR dependent inhibition of PARG enhances PARP inhibitor therapy for DNA repair proficient and deficient pancreatic cancer cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mahsa Zarei
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Londin
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
DNA damage response and repair (DDR) is a tightly controlled process that serves as a barrier to tumorigenesis. Consequently, DDR is frequently altered in human malignancy, and can be exploited for therapeutic gain either through molecularly targeted therapies or as a consequence of therapeutic agents that induce genotoxic stress. In select tumor types, steroid hormones and cognate receptors serve as major drivers of tumor development/progression, and as such are frequently targets of therapeutic intervention. Recent evidence suggests that the existence of crosstalk mechanisms linking the DDR machinery and hormone signaling pathways cooperate to influence both cancer progression and therapeutic response. These underlying mechanisms and their implications for cancer management will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Schiewer
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S 10th St Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S 10th St Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S 10th St Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S 10th St Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S 10th St Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S 10th St Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Augello MA, Berman-Booty LD, Carr R, Yoshida A, Dean JL, Schiewer MJ, Feng FY, Tomlins SA, Gao E, Koch WJ, Benovic JL, Diehl JA, Knudsen KE. Consequence of the tumor-associated conversion to cyclin D1b. EMBO Mol Med 2016; 7:628-47. [PMID: 25787974 PMCID: PMC4492821 DOI: 10.15252/emmm.201404242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical evidence suggests that cyclin D1b, a variant of cyclin D1, is associated with tumor progression and poor outcome. However, the underlying molecular basis was unknown. Here, novel models were created to generate a genetic switch from cyclin D1 to cyclin D1b. Extensive analyses uncovered overlapping but non-redundant functions of cyclin D1b compared to cyclin D1 on developmental phenotypes, and illustrated the importance of the transcriptional regulatory functions of cyclin D1b in vivo. Data obtained identify cyclin D1b as an oncogene, wherein cyclin D1b expression under the endogenous promoter induced cellular transformation and further cooperated with known oncogenes to promote tumor growth in vivo. Further molecular interrogation uncovered unexpected links between cyclin D1b and the DNA damage/PARP1 regulatory networks, which could be exploited to suppress cyclin D1b-driven tumors. Collectively, these data are the first to define the consequence of cyclin D1b expression on normal cellular function, present evidence for cyclin D1b as an oncogene, and provide pre-clinical evidence of effective methods to thwart growth of cells dependent upon this oncogenic variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Augello
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lisa D Berman-Booty
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Richard Carr
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Akihiro Yoshida
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jeffry L Dean
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Scott A Tomlins
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Erhe Gao
- Pharmacology & Center for Translational Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Walter J Koch
- Pharmacology & Center for Translational Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Benovic
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John Alan Diehl
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schrecengost RS, Keller SN, Schiewer MJ, Knudsen KE, Smith CD. Downregulation of Critical Oncogenes by the Selective SK2 Inhibitor ABC294640 Hinders Prostate Cancer Progression. Mol Cancer Res 2015; 13:1591-601. [PMID: 26271487 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-14-0626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2014] [Accepted: 07/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The bioactive sphingolipid sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) drives several hallmark processes of cancer, making the enzymes that synthesize S1P, that is, sphingosine kinase 1 and 2 (SK1 and SK2), important molecular targets for cancer drug development. ABC294640 is a first-in-class SK2 small-molecule inhibitor that effectively inhibits cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Given that AR and Myc are two of the most widely implicated oncogenes in prostate cancer, and that sphingolipids affect signaling by both proteins, the therapeutic potential for using ABC294640 in the treatment of prostate cancer was evaluated. This study demonstrates that ABC294640 abrogates signaling pathways requisite for prostate cancer growth and proliferation. Key findings validate that ABC294640 treatment of early-stage and advanced prostate cancer models downregulate Myc and AR expression and activity. This corresponds with significant inhibition of growth, proliferation, and cell-cycle progression. Finally, oral administration of ABC294640 was found to dramatically impede xenograft tumor growth. Together, these pre-clinical findings support the hypotheses that SK2 activity is required for prostate cancer function and that ABC294640 represents a new pharmacological agent for treatment of early stage and aggressive prostate cancer. IMPLICATIONS Sphingosine kinase inhibition disrupts multiple oncogenic signaling pathways that are deregulated in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Staci N Keller
- Apogee Biotechnology Corporation, Hummelstown, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Urology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Radiation Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles D Smith
- Apogee Biotechnology Corporation, Hummelstown, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Goodwin JF, Kothari V, Drake JM, Zhao S, Dylgjeri E, Dean JL, Schiewer MJ, McNair C, Magee MS, Den RB, Zhu Z, Graham NA, Vashisht AA, Wohlschlegel JA, Graeber TG, Karnes RJ, Takhar M, Davicioni E, Tomlins SA, Sharifi N, Witte ON, Feng FY, Knudsen KE. Abstract 1860: DNA-PK-mediated transcriptional regulation drives tumor progression and metastasis. Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-1860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Emerging evidence demonstrates that the DNA repair kinase DNA-PK exerts divergent roles in transcriptional regulation of unsolved consequence. Here, in vitro and in vivo interrogation demonstrate that DNA-PK functions as a selective modulator of transcriptional networks that induce cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Accordingly, suppression of DNA-PK inhibits tumor metastases. Clinical assessment revealed that DNA-PK is significantly elevated in advanced disease, and independently predicts for metastases, recurrence, and reduced overall survival. Further investigation demonstrated that DNA-PK in advanced tumors is highly activated, independently of DNA damage indicators. Combined, these findings put forth new paradigms for DNA-PK function, identify DNA-PK as a potent driver of tumor progression and metastases, and nominate DNA-PK as a therapeutic target for advanced malignancies.
Citation Format: Jonathan F. Goodwin, Vishal Kothari, Justin M. Drake, Shuang Zhao, Emanuela Dylgjeri, Jeffry L. Dean, Matthew J. Schiewer, Christopher McNair, Michael S. Magee, Robert B. Den, Ziqi Zhu, Nicholas A. Graham, Ajay A. Vashisht, James A. Wohlschlegel, Thomas G. Graeber, R Jeffrey Karnes, Mandeep Takhar, Elai Davicioni, Scott A. Tomlins, Nima Sharifi, Owen N. Witte, Felix Y. Feng, Karen E. Knudsen. DNA-PK-mediated transcriptional regulation drives tumor progression and metastasis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1860. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1860
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ziqi Zhu
- 4Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mandeep Takhar
- 6GenomeDx Biosciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elai Davicioni
- 6GenomeDx Biosciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schiewer MJ, Han S, Evans J, Augello MA, Berman-Booty L, Parsons T, Birbe R, Dicker AP, Kelly WK, Gomella LG, Feng F, Knudsen KE. Abstract 5054: Discerning the PARP-dependent AR cistrome/transcriptome in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-5054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) is an abundant nuclear enzyme that modifies substrates by poly (ADP-ribose)-ylation. Although PARP-1 has a number of well-described roles in the response to and repair of DNA damage (especially as associated with base excision repair), significant studies have demonstrated that PARP-1 functions in transcriptional regulation in multiple contexts. In the context of prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa), our group recently discovered that PARP-1 enzymatic activity is a critical effector of androgen receptor (AR) function, and is recruited to regulatory sites of select AR target genes. Pharmacological inhibition of PARP-1 enzymatic activity results in diminished AR and PARP-1 residency at AR target gene regulatory loci, reduced AR target gene expression, and reduced AR-driven, PCa-associated phenotypes, including castrate-resistant PCa (CRPC) AR function, tumor cell growth, and transition to CRPC. Accordingly, to gain further mechanistic insight in to the PARP-1-dependent AR cistrome/transcriptome, unbiased genome-wide analyses were undertaken in both hormone therapy-sensitive PCa and CRPC model systems. Data to be discussed provide essential insight into the mechanisms by which PARP-1 modulates gene regulation and AR function, but also identifies new and unexpected functions of PARP-1 in human malignancies.
Citation Format: Matthew J. Schiewer, Sumin Han, Joseph Evans, Michael A. Augello, Lisa Berman-Booty, Theodore Parsons, Ruth Birbe, Adam P. Dicker, William Kevin Kelly, Leonard G. Gomella, Felix Feng, Karen E. Knudsen. Discerning the PARP-dependent AR cistrome/transcriptome in prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 5054. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-5054
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sumin Han
- 2Univeristy of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | | | | | - Ruth Birbe
- 1Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Goodwin JF, Kothari V, Drake JM, Zhao S, Dylgjeri E, Dean JL, Schiewer MJ, McNair C, Jones JK, Aytes A, Magee MS, Snook AE, Zhu Z, Den RB, Birbe RC, Gomella LG, Graham NA, Vashisht AA, Wohlschlegel JA, Graeber TG, Karnes RJ, Takhar M, Davicioni E, Tomlins SA, Abate-Shen C, Sharifi N, Witte ON, Feng FY, Knudsen KE. DNA-PKcs-Mediated Transcriptional Regulation Drives Prostate Cancer Progression and Metastasis. Cancer Cell 2015; 28:97-113. [PMID: 26175416 PMCID: PMC4531387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Revised: 04/02/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Emerging evidence demonstrates that the DNA repair kinase DNA-PKcs exerts divergent roles in transcriptional regulation of unsolved consequence. Here, in vitro and in vivo interrogation demonstrate that DNA-PKcs functions as a selective modulator of transcriptional networks that induce cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Accordingly, suppression of DNA-PKcs inhibits tumor metastases. Clinical assessment revealed that DNA-PKcs is significantly elevated in advanced disease and independently predicts for metastases, recurrence, and reduced overall survival. Further investigation demonstrated that DNA-PKcs in advanced tumors is highly activated, independent of DNA damage indicators. Combined, these findings reveal unexpected DNA-PKcs functions, identify DNA-PKcs as a potent driver of tumor progression and metastases, and nominate DNA-PKcs as a therapeutic target for advanced malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan F Goodwin
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Vishal Kothari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Justin M Drake
- Departments of Microbiology, Immunology, & Molecular Genetics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Shuang Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Emanuela Dylgjeri
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Jeffry L Dean
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Christopher McNair
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Jennifer K Jones
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Alvaro Aytes
- Departments of Urology, Pathology & Cell Biology, Systems Biology, Institute for Cancer Genetics, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Michael S Magee
- Department of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Adam E Snook
- Department of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Ziqi Zhu
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Robert B Den
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Ruth C Birbe
- Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Nicholas A Graham
- Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Ajay A Vashisht
- Department of Biological Chemistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | - Thomas G Graeber
- Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; California NanoSystems Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | | | | | | | - Scott A Tomlins
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Cory Abate-Shen
- Departments of Urology, Pathology & Cell Biology, Systems Biology, Institute for Cancer Genetics, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Owen N Witte
- Departments of Microbiology, Immunology, & Molecular Genetics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Eli & Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
de Leeuw R, Berman-Booty LD, Schiewer MJ, Ciment SJ, Den RB, Dicker AP, Kelly WK, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD, Gomella LG, Knudsen KE. Novel actions of next-generation taxanes benefit advanced stages of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21:795-807. [PMID: 25691773 PMCID: PMC4333741 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve the outcomes of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), there is an urgent need for more effective therapies and approaches that individualize specific treatments for patients with CRPC. These studies compared the novel taxane cabazitaxel with the previous generation docetaxel, and aimed to determine which tumors are most likely to respond. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Cabazitaxel and docetaxel were compared via in vitro modeling to determine the molecular mechanism, biochemical and cell biologic impact, and cell proliferation, which was further assessed ex vivo in human tumor explants. Isogenic pairs of RB knockdown and control cells were interrogated in vitro and in xenograft tumors for cabazitaxel response. RESULTS The data herein show that (i) cabazitaxel exerts stronger cytostatic and cytotoxic response compared with docetaxel, especially in CRPC; (ii) cabazitaxel induces aberrant mitosis, leading to pyknotic and multinucleated cells; (iii) taxanes do not act through the androgen receptor (AR); (iv) gene-expression profiling reveals distinct molecular actions for cabazitaxel; and (v) tumors that have progressed to castration resistance via loss of RB show enhanced sensitivity to cabazitaxel. CONCLUSIONS Cabazitaxel not only induces improved cytostatic and cytotoxic effects, but also affects distinct molecular pathways, compared with docetaxel, which could underlie its efficacy after docetaxel treatment has failed in patients with CRPC. Finally, RB is identified as the first potential biomarker that could define the therapeutic response to taxanes in metastatic CRPC. This would suggest that loss of RB function induces sensitization to taxanes, which could benefit up to 50% of CRPC cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée de Leeuw
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lisa D Berman-Booty
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen J Ciment
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert B Den
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William K Kelly
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Edouard J Trabulsi
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Costas D Lallas
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Leonard G Gomella
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) is an abundant, ubiquitously expressed NAD(+)-dependent nuclear enzyme that has prognostic value for a multitude of human cancers. PARP1 activity serves to poly (ADP-ribose)-ylate the vast majority of known client proteins and affects a number of cellular and biologic outcomes, by mediating the DNA damage response (DDR), base-excision repair (BER), and DNA strand break (DSB) pathways. PARP1 is also critically important for the maintenance of genomic integrity, as well as chromatin dynamics and transcriptional regulation. Evidence also indicates that PARP-directed therapeutics are "synthetic lethal" in BRCA1/2-deficient model systems. Strikingly, recent studies have unearthed exciting new transcriptional-regulatory roles for PARP1, which has profound implications for human malignancies and will be reviewed herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen E Knudsen
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Departments of Cancer Biology, Urology, and Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dressing GE, Knutson TP, Schiewer MJ, Daniel AR, Hagan CR, Diep CH, Knudsen KE, Lange CA. Progesterone receptor-cyclin D1 complexes induce cell cycle-dependent transcriptional programs in breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol 2014; 28:442-57. [PMID: 24606123 DOI: 10.1210/me.2013-1196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The progesterone receptor (PR) and its coactivators are direct targets of activated cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) in response to peptide growth factors, progesterone, and deregulation of cell cycle inhibitors. Herein, using the T47D breast cancer model, we probed mechanisms of cell cycle-dependent PR action. In the absence of exogenous progestin, the PR is specifically phosphorylated during the G2/M phase. Accordingly, numerous PR target genes are cell cycle regulated, including HSPB8, a heat-shock protein whose high expression is associated with tamoxifen resistance. Progestin-induced HSPB8 expression required cyclin D1 and was insensitive to antiestrogens but blocked by antiprogestins or inhibition of specificity factor 1 (SP1). HSPB8 expression increased with or without ligand when cells were G2/M synchronized or contained high levels of cyclin D1. Knockdown of PRs abrogated ligand-independent HSPB8 expression in synchronized cells. Notably, PRs and cyclin D1 copurified in whole-cell lysates of transiently transfected COS-1 cells and in PR-positive T47D breast cancer cells expressing endogenous cyclin D1. PRs, cyclin D1, and SP1 were recruited to the HSPB8 promoter in progestin-treated T47D breast cancer cells. Mutation of PR Ser345 to Ala (S345A) or inhibition of CDK2 activity using roscovitine disrupted PR/cyclin D1 interactions with DNA and blocked HSPB8 mRNA expression. Interaction of phosphorylated PRs with SP1 and cyclin D1 provides a mechanism for targeting transcriptionally active PRs to selected gene promoters relevant to breast cancer progression. Understanding the functional linkage between PRs and cell cycle regulatory proteins will provide keys to targeting novel PR/cyclin D1 cross talk in both hormone-responsive disease and HSPB8-high refractory disease with high HSPB8 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwen E Dressing
- Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology (G.E.D., T.P.K., A.R.D., C.R.H., C.H.D., C.A.L.), Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455; and Departments of Cancer Biology, Urology, and Radiation Oncology (M.J.S., K.E.K.), Kimmel Cancer Center Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Despite recent advances in the treatment for metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma, clinical management of this tumor type remains a major challenge, and there is as of yet no durable cure for advanced disease. Developing pathways that could be co-targeted alongside the androgen receptor or that would otherwise thwart the development of the CRPC is a current translational and clinical priority. In this issue, a new study by Zadra et al identifies the energy sensor AMPK (5′ AMP-activated kinase) as a viable therapeutic target in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schrecengost RS, Dean JL, Goodwin JF, Schiewer MJ, Urban MW, Stanek TJ, Sussman RT, Hicks JL, Birbe RC, Draganova-Tacheva RA, Visakorpi T, DeMarzo AM, McMahon SB, Knudsen KE. USP22 regulates oncogenic signaling pathways to drive lethal cancer progression. Cancer Res 2013; 74:272-86. [PMID: 24197134 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-1954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Increasing evidence links deregulation of the ubiquitin-specific proteases 22 (USP22) deubitiquitylase to cancer development and progression in a select group of tumor types, but its specificity and underlying mechanisms of action are not well defined. Here we show that USP22 is a critical promoter of lethal tumor phenotypes that acts by modulating nuclear receptor and oncogenic signaling. In multiple xenograft models of human cancer, modeling of tumor-associated USP22 deregulation demonstrated that USP22 controls androgen receptor accumulation and signaling, and that it enhances expression of critical target genes coregulated by androgen receptor and MYC. USP22 not only reprogrammed androgen receptor function, but was sufficient to induce the transition to therapeutic resistance. Notably, in vivo depletion experiments revealed that USP22 is critical to maintain phenotypes associated with end-stage disease. This was a significant finding given clinical evidence that USP22 is highly deregulated in tumors, which have achieved therapeutic resistance. Taken together, our findings define USP22 as a critical effector of tumor progression, which drives lethal phenotypes, rationalizing this enzyme as an appealing therapeutic target to treat advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy S Schrecengost
- Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Cancer Biology, Urology, Radiation Oncology, Pathology, and Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Institute of Biomedical Technology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Steffen JD, Tholey RM, Langelier MF, Planck JL, Schiewer MJ, Lal S, Bildzukewicz NA, Yeo CJ, Knudsen KE, Brody JR, Pascal JM. Targeting PARP-1 allosteric regulation offers therapeutic potential against cancer. Cancer Res 2013; 74:31-7. [PMID: 24189460 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-1701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PARP-1 is a nuclear protein that has important roles in maintenance of genomic integrity. During genotoxic stress, PARP-1 recruits to sites of DNA damage where PARP-1 domain architecture initiates catalytic activation and subsequent poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent DNA repair. PARP-1 inhibition is a promising new way to selectively target cancers harboring DNA repair deficiencies. However, current inhibitors target other PARPs, raising important questions about long-term off-target effects. Here, we propose a new strategy that targets PARP-1 allosteric regulation as a selective way of inhibiting PARP-1. We found that disruption of PARP-1 domain-domain contacts through mutagenesis held no cellular consequences on recruitment to DNA damage or a model system of transcriptional regulation, but prevented DNA-damage-dependent catalytic activation. Furthermore, PARP-1 mutant overexpression in a pancreatic cancer cell line (MIA PaCa-2) increased sensitivity to platinum-based anticancer agents. These results not only highlight the potential of a synergistic drug combination of allosteric PARP inhibitors with DNA-damaging agents in genomically unstable cancer cells (regardless of homologous recombination status), but also signify important applications of selective PARP-1 inhibition. Finally, the development of a high-throughput PARP-1 assay is described as a tool to promote discovery of novel PARP-1 selective inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamin D Steffen
- Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Surgery, Division of Surgical Research, The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center; and Department of Cancer Biology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Goodwin JF, Schiewer MJ, Dean JL, Schrecengost RS, de Leeuw R, Han S, Ma T, Den RB, Dicker AP, Feng FY, Knudsen KE. A hormone-DNA repair circuit governs the response to genotoxic insult. Cancer Discov 2013; 3:1254-71. [PMID: 24027197 PMCID: PMC3823813 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 274] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Alterations in DNA repair promote tumor development, but the impact on tumor progression is poorly understood. Here, discovery of a biochemical circuit linking hormone signaling to DNA repair and therapeutic resistance is reported. Findings show that androgen receptor (AR) activity is induced by DNA damage and promotes expression and activation of a gene expression program governing DNA repair. Subsequent investigation revealed that activated AR promotes resolution of double-strand breaks and resistance to DNA damage both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNAPKcs) was identified as a key target of AR after damage, controlling AR-mediated DNA repair and cell survival after genotoxic insult. Finally, DNAPKcs was shown to potentiate AR function, consistent with a dual role in both DNA repair and transcriptional regulation. Combined, these studies identify the AR-DNAPKcs circuit as a major effector of DNA repair and therapeutic resistance and establish a new node for therapeutic intervention in advanced disease. SIGNIFICANCE The present study identifies for the fi rst time a positive feedback circuit linking hormone action to the DNA damage response and shows the significant impact of this process on tumor progression and therapeutic response. These provocative findings provide the foundation for development of novel nodes of therapeutic intervention for advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan F. Goodwin
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J. Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffry L. Dean
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Randy S. Schrecengost
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Renee de Leeuw
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sumin Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Teng Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Robert B. Den
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Adam P. Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan*
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Goodwin JF, Schiewer MJ, Feng FY, Knudsen KE. Abstract 1071: Impact of AR activation status on the DNA damage response. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-1071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Recent evidence implicates the androgen receptor (AR) as a critical modulator of the DNA damage response in prostate cancer. Treatment for locally advanced disease depends on combined radiation therapy and ablation of AR function, and clinical evidence strongly supports the contention that active AR reduces the response to radiotherapy. Moreover, it was reported in vitro that AR activation can induce DNA damage at sites of active transcription, thus providing additional evidence for crosstalk between the DNA damage response and AR pathways. Despite these observations, the underpinning mechanism by which AR alters the response to DNA damage remains unknown.
Several lines of evidence will be discussed which illuminate a role for AR in the response to DNA damage. First, investigation in a battery of hormone-therapy sensitive prostate cancer cells (in which AR activity remains dependent on ligand binding) and in castrate resistant tumor cells (reflecting advanced disease wherein AR activity is enhanced) showed that androgen depletion enhances the response to ionizing radiation. Restoration of dihydrotestosterone reduced the response to radiation, thus demonstrating that ligand-induced AR activity promotes a resistance to radiation. Second, the mechanism by which AR promotes radioresistance was addressed. Preliminary findings indicate that in the presence of DNA damage, AR dramatically alters the rate of DNA damage repair independent of significant effects on cell cycle. Moreover, these studies uncovered an unexpected role for androgen-activated AR to alter expression and subsequent activity of genes critical for the DNA damage response, possibly through differential recruitment of AR to loci of key players in the response to damage. Finally, a series radioresistant prostate cancer model systems were developed, wherein the impact of AR on acquired radioresistance is under investigation; early studies in these models indicate that altered AR output is associated with acquired radioresistance. Combined, the studies to be presented reveal novel functions of androgen and AR in controlling the molecular and cellular response to DNA damage, and provide the basis for future studies directed at targeting DNA-damage specific AR activity in the course of human disease.
Citation Format: Jonathan F. Goodwin, Matthew J. Schiewer, Felix Y. Feng, Karen E. Knudsen. Impact of AR activation status on the DNA damage response. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1071. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1071
Collapse
|
50
|
Schiewer MJ, Goodwin JF, Han S, Brenner JC, Augello MA, Dean JL, Liu F, Planck JL, Ravindranathan P, Chinnaiyan AM, McCue P, Gomella LG, Raj GV, Dicker AP, Brody JR, Pascal JM, Centenera MM, Butler LM, Tilley WD, Feng FY, Knudsen KE. Dual roles of PARP-1 promote cancer growth and progression. Cancer Discov 2012; 2:1134-49. [PMID: 22993403 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 316] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED PARP-1 is an abundant nuclear enzyme that modifies substrates by poly(ADP-ribose)-ylation. PARP-1 has well-described functions in DNA damage repair and also functions as a context-specific regulator of transcription factors. With multiple models, data show that PARP-1 elicits protumorigenic effects in androgen receptor (AR)-positive prostate cancer cells, in both the presence and absence of genotoxic insult. Mechanistically, PARP-1 is recruited to sites of AR function, therein promoting AR occupancy and AR function. It was further confirmed in genetically defined systems that PARP-1 supports AR transcriptional function, and that in models of advanced prostate cancer, PARP-1 enzymatic activity is enhanced, further linking PARP-1 to AR activity and disease progression. In vivo analyses show that PARP-1 activity is required for AR function in xenograft tumors, as well as tumor cell growth in vivo and generation and maintenance of castration resistance. Finally, in a novel explant system of primary human tumors, targeting PARP-1 potently suppresses tumor cell proliferation. Collectively, these studies identify novel functions of PARP-1 in promoting disease progression, and ultimately suggest that the dual functions of PARP-1 can be targeted in human prostate cancer to suppress tumor growth and progression to castration resistance. SIGNIFICANCE These studies introduce a paradigm shift with regard to PARP-1 function in human malignancy, and suggest that the dual functions of PARP-1 in DNA damage repair and transcription factor regulation can be leveraged to suppress pathways critical for promalignant phenotypes in prostate cancer cells by modulation of the DNA damage response and hormone signaling pathways. The combined studies highlight the importance of dual PARP-1 function in malignancy and provide the basis for therapeutic targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Schiewer
- Departments of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|