1
|
Spruit JR, Jansen RWMM, de Groot JR, de Vries TAC, Hemels MEW, Douma RA, de Haan LR, Brinkman K, Moeniralam HS, de Kruif M, Dormans T, Appelman B, Reidinga AC, Rusch D, Gritters van den Oever NC, Schuurman RJ, Beudel M, Simsek S. Does atrial fibrillation affect prognosis in hospitalised COVID-19 patients? A multicentre historical cohort study in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071137. [PMID: 38070891 PMCID: PMC10729035 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this multicentre COVID-PREDICT study (a nationwide observational cohort study that aims to better understand clinical course of COVID-19 and to predict which COVID-19 patients should receive which treatment and which type of care) was to determine the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, complications and discharge destination in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. SETTING Data from a historical cohort study in eight hospitals (both academic and non-academic) in the Netherlands between January 2020 and July 2021 were used in this study. PARTICIPANTS 3064 hospitalised COVID-19 patients >18 years old. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the incidence of new-onset AF during hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes were the association between new-onset AF (vs prevalent or non-AF) and mortality, ICU admissions, complications and discharge destination, performed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Of the 3064 included patients (60.6% men, median age: 65 years, IQR 55-75 years), 72 (2.3%) patients had prevalent AF and 164 (5.4%) patients developed new-onset AF during hospitalisation. Compared with patients without AF, patients with new-onset AF had a higher incidence of death (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.71, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.59) an ICU admission (aOR 5.45, 95% CI 3.90 to 7.61). Mortality was non-significantly different between patients with prevalent AF and those with new-onset AF (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.76). However, new-onset AF was associated with a higher incidence of ICU admission and complications compared with prevalent AF (OR 6.34, 95% CI 2.95 to 13.63, OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.67 to 5.55, respectively). CONCLUSION New-onset AF was associated with an increased incidence of death, ICU admission, complications and a lower chance to be discharged home. These effects were far less pronounced in patients with prevalent AF. Therefore, new-onset AF seems to represent a marker of disease severity, rather than a cause of adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joris R de Groot
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Martin E W Hemels
- Department of Cardiology, Rijnstate, Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Renee A Douma
- Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Flevo Hospital, Almere, Netherlands
| | - Lianne R de Haan
- Flevo Hospital, Almere, Netherlands
- Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands
| | - Kees Brinkman
- Department of Internal Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hazra S Moeniralam
- Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martijn de Kruif
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, Netherlands
| | - Tom Dormans
- Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Brent Appelman
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Auke C Reidinga
- Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daisy Rusch
- Research, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Martijn Beudel
- Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Suat Simsek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie VUMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Haan L, Ten Wolde M, Beudel M, Olde Engberink RHG, Appelman B, Haspels-Hogervorst EK, Rusch D, Gritters van den Oever NC, Simsek S, Paternotte N, van den Bergh JP, Wyers CE, de Kruif MD, Dormans T, Moeniralam H, Bokhizzou N, Brinkman K, Douma R. What is the aetiology of dysnatraemia in COVID-19 and how is this related to outcomes in patients admitted during earlier and later COVID-19 waves? A multicentre, retrospective observational study in 11 Dutch hospitals. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075232. [PMID: 37963704 PMCID: PMC10649520 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the relationship among dysnatraemia at hospital presentation and duration of admission, risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and all-cause mortality and to assess the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of hyponatraemia in patients with COVID-19. Our hypothesis is that both hyponatraemia and hypernatraemia at presentation are associated with adverse outcomes. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Secondary care; 11 Dutch hospitals (2 university and 9 general hospitals). PARTICIPANTS An analysis was performed within the retrospective multicentre cohort study COVIDPredict. 7811 patients were included (60% men, 40% women) between 24 February 2020 and 9 August 2022. Patients who were ≥18 years with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 or CT with COVID-19 reporting and data system score≥4 and alternative diagnosis were included. Patients were excluded when serum sodium levels at presentation were not registered in the database or when they had been transferred from another participating hospital. OUTCOME MEASURES We studied demographics, medical history, symptoms and outcomes. Patients were stratified according to serum sodium concentration and urinary sodium excretion. RESULTS Hyponatraemia was present in 2677 (34.2%) patients and hypernatraemia in 126 (1.6%) patients. Patients with hyponatraemia presented more frequently with diarrhoea, lower blood pressure and tachycardia. Hyponatraemia was, despite a higher risk for ICU admission (OR 1.27 (1.11-1.46; p<0.001)), not associated with mortality or the risk for intubation. Patients with hypernatraemia had higher mortality rates (OR 2.25 (1.49-3.41; p<0.001)) and were at risk for ICU admission (OR 2.89 (1.83-4.58)) and intubation (OR 2.95 (1.83-4.74)). CONCLUSIONS Hypernatraemia at presentation was associated with adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Hypovolaemic hyponatraemia was found to be the most common aetiology of hyponatraemia. Hyponatraemia of unknown aetiology was associated with a higher risk for ICU admission and intubation and longer duration of admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne de Haan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Ten Wolde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Beudel
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik H G Olde Engberink
- Center of Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brent Appelman
- Center of Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daisy Rusch
- Department of Intensive Care, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Suat Simsek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke Paternotte
- Department of Pulmonology, Northwest Hospital Group, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | | | - Caroline E Wyers
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn D de Kruif
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Dormans
- Department of Intensive Care, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Hazra Moeniralam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Neyma Bokhizzou
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bovenij Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Brinkman
- Department of Internal Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Renee Douma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Swets MC, Moss RJ, Kor F, Hilarius D, Moes DJAR, Berkhout WE, van den Toorn LM, van den Oever NCG, de Valk R, Rosendaal FR, Hunfeld N, Groeneveld GH, de Boer MGJ. A comparison of the effectiveness of different doses of tocilizumab and sarilumab in the treatment of severe COVID-19: a natural experiment due to drug shortages. Int J Infect Dis 2023; 129:57-62. [PMID: 36738957 PMCID: PMC9893803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors are administered to treat patients hospitalized with COVID-19. In 2021, due to shortages, different dosing regimens of tocilizumab, and a switch to sarilumab, were consecutively implemented. Using real-world data, we compare the effectiveness of these IL-6 inhibitors. METHODS Hospitalized patients with COVID-19, treated with IL-6 inhibitors, were included in this natural experiment study. Sixty-day survival, hospital- and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and progression to ICU or death were compared between 8 mg/kg tocilizumab, fixed-dose tocilizumab, low-dose tocilizumab, and fixed-dose sarilumab treatment groups. RESULTS A total of 5485 patients from 49 hospitals were included. After correction for confounding, increased hazard ratios (HRs) for 60-day mortality were observed for fixed-dose tocilizumab (HR 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.39), low-dose tocilizumab (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.97-1.31), and sarilumab (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42), all relative to 8 mg/kg. The 8 mg/kg dosing regimen had lower odds of progression to ICU or death. Both hospital- and ICU length of stay were shorter for low-dose tocilizumab than for the 8 mg/kg group. CONCLUSION We found differences in the probability of 60-day survival and the incidence of the combined outcome of mortality or ICU admission, mostly favoring 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. Because of potential time-associated residual confounding, further clinical studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike C Swets
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Rob J Moss
- Dutch National Medication Coordination Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Flip Kor
- LOGEX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Doranne Hilarius
- Department of Pharmacy, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Jan A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon M van den Toorn
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Frits R Rosendaal
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Hunfeld
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert H Groeneveld
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine- Acute Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mark G J de Boer
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ottenhoff MC, Ramos LA, Potters W, Janssen MLF, Hubers D, Hu S, Fridgeirsson EA, Piña-Fuentes D, Thomas R, van der Horst ICC, Herff C, Kubben P, Elbers PWG, Marquering HA, Welling M, Simsek S, de Kruif MD, Dormans T, Fleuren LM, Schinkel M, Noordzij PG, van den Bergh JP, Wyers CE, Buis DTB, Wiersinga WJ, van den Hout EHC, Reidinga AC, Rusch D, Sigaloff KCE, Douma RA, de Haan L, Gritters van den Oever NC, Rennenberg RJMW, van Wingen GA, Aries MJH, Beudel M. Predicting mortality of individual patients with COVID-19: a multicentre Dutch cohort. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047347. [PMID: 34281922 PMCID: PMC8290951 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Develop and validate models that predict mortality of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING A multicentre cohort across 10 Dutch hospitals including patients from 27 February to 8 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (age ≥18) admitted to the hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 21-day all-cause mortality evaluated by the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The predictive value of age was explored by comparison with age-based rules used in practice and by excluding age from the analysis. RESULTS 2273 patients were included, of whom 516 had died or discharged to palliative care within 21 days after admission. Five feature sets, including premorbid, clinical presentation and laboratory and radiology values, were derived from 80 features. Additionally, an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)-based data-driven feature selection selected the 10 features with the highest F values: age, number of home medications, urea nitrogen, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, oxygen saturation (%), oxygen saturation is measured on room air, oxygen saturation is measured on oxygen therapy, blood gas pH and history of chronic cardiac disease. A linear logistic regression and non-linear tree-based gradient boosting algorithm fitted the data with an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.85) and 0.82 (0.79 to 0.85), respectively, using the 10 selected features. Both models outperformed age-based decision rules used in practice (AUC of 0.69, 0.65 to 0.74 for age >70). Furthermore, performance remained stable when excluding age as predictor (AUC of 0.78, 0.75 to 0.81). CONCLUSION Both models showed good performance and had better test characteristics than age-based decision rules, using 10 admission features readily available in Dutch hospitals. The models hold promise to aid decision-making during a hospital bed shortage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten C Ottenhoff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas A Ramos
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics/Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter Potters
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus L F Janssen
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Deborah Hubers
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Shi Hu
- Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Egill A Fridgeirsson
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dan Piña-Fuentes
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rajat Thomas
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Herff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Kubben
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul W G Elbers
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk A Marquering
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics/Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Max Welling
- Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suat Simsek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn D de Kruif
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Dormans
- Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas M Fleuren
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Schinkel
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (C.E.M.M.), Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter G Noordzij
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Caroline E Wyers
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - David T B Buis
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Joost Wiersinga
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (C.E.M.M.), Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ella H C van den Hout
- Department of Internal Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Auke C Reidinga
- Department of Intensive Care, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daisy Rusch
- Research, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kim C E Sigaloff
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Renee A Douma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, Flevoland, The Netherlands
| | - Lianne de Haan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, Flevoland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roger J M W Rennenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Guido A van Wingen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel J H Aries
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Beudel
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Duivendrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meijer RI, Hoekstra T, van den Oever NCG, Simsek S, van den Bergh JP, Douma RA, Reidinga AC, Moeniralam HS, Dormans T, Smits MM. Treatment with a DPP-4 inhibitor at time of hospital admission for COVID-19 is not associated with improved clinical outcomes: data from the COVID-PREDICT cohort study in The Netherlands. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2021; 20:1155-1160. [PMID: 34222054 PMCID: PMC8233181 DOI: 10.1007/s40200-021-00833-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-)4 could reduce coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity by reducing inflammation and enhancing tissue repair beyond glucose lowering. We aimed to assess this in a prospective cohort study. Methods We studied in 565 patients with type 2 diabetes in the CovidPredict Clinical Course Cohort whether use of a DPP-4 inhibitor prior to hospital admission due to COVID-19 was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Using crude analyses and propensity score matching (on age, sex and BMI), 28 patients using a DPP-4 inhibitor were identified and compared to non-users. Results No differences were found in the primary outcome mortality (matched-analysis = odds-ratio: 0,94 [95% confidence interval: 0,69 – 1,28], p-value: 0,689) or any of the secondary outcomes (ICU admission, invasive ventilation, thrombotic events or infectious complications). Additional analyses comparing users of DPP-4 inhibitors with subgroups of non-users (subgroup 1: users of metformin and sulphonylurea; subgroup 2: users of any insulin combination), allowing to correct for diabetes severity, did not yield different results. Conclusions We conclude that outpatient use of a DPP-4 inhibitor does not affect the clinical outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes who are hospitalized because of COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick I Meijer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Trynke Hoekstra
- Department of Health Sciences and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Suat Simsek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Renée A Douma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Flevohospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Auke C Reidinga
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hazra S Moeniralam
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Dormans
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mark M Smits
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Diabetes Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vumc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chatterjee A, Wu G, Primakov S, Oberije C, Woodruff H, Kubben P, Henry R, Aries MJH, Beudel M, Noordzij PG, Dormans T, Gritters van den Oever NC, van den Bergh JP, Wyers CE, Simsek S, Douma R, Reidinga AC, de Kruif MD, Guiot J, Frix AN, Louis R, Moutschen M, Lovinfosse P, Lambin P. Can predicting COVID-19 mortality in a European cohort using only demographic and comorbidity data surpass age-based prediction: An externally validated study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0249920. [PMID: 33857224 PMCID: PMC8049248 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish whether one can build a mortality prediction model for COVID-19 patients based solely on demographics and comorbidity data that outperforms age alone. Such a model could be a precursor to implementing smart lockdowns and vaccine distribution strategies. METHODS The training cohort comprised 2337 COVID-19 inpatients from nine hospitals in The Netherlands. The clinical outcome was death within 21 days of being discharged. The features were derived from electronic health records collected during admission. Three feature selection methods were used: LASSO, univariate using a novel metric, and pairwise (age being half of each pair). 478 patients from Belgium were used to test the model. All modeling attempts were compared against an age-only model. RESULTS In the training cohort, the mortality group's median age was 77 years (interquartile range = 70-83), higher than the non-mortality group (median = 65, IQR = 55-75). The incidence of former/active smokers, male gender, hypertension, diabetes, dementia, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic cardiac disease, chronic neurological disease, and chronic kidney disease was higher in the mortality group. All stated differences were statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. LASSO selected eight features, novel univariate chose five, and pairwise chose none. No model was able to surpass an age-only model in the external validation set, where age had an AUC of 0.85 and a balanced accuracy of 0.77. CONCLUSION When applied to an external validation set, we found that an age-only mortality model outperformed all modeling attempts (curated on www.covid19risk.ai) using three feature selection methods on 22 demographic and comorbid features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avishek Chatterjee
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Guangyao Wu
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sergey Primakov
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cary Oberije
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Henry Woodruff
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Kubben
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel J. H. Aries
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Beudel
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter G. Noordzij
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Dormans
- Department of Intensive Care, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Caroline E. Wyers
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Suat Simsek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Renée Douma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Auke C. Reidinga
- Department of Intensive Care, Martiniziekenhuis, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn D. de Kruif
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Julien Guiot
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Anne-Noelle Frix
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Renaud Louis
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Pierre Lovinfosse
- Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Philippe Lambin
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eck RJ, Hulshof L, Wiersema R, Thio CHL, Hiemstra B, van den Oever NCG, Gans ROB, van der Horst ICC, Meijer K, Keus F. Incidence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients: data from two prospective cohort studies. Crit Care 2021; 25:27. [PMID: 33436012 PMCID: PMC7801861 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03457-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence, incidence, prognostic factors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients receiving contemporary thrombosis prophylaxis. Methods We conducted a pooled analysis of two prospective cohort studies. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital pulmonary embolism or lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (PE-LDVT), in-hospital nonleg deep vein thrombosis (NLDVT), and 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between predefined baseline prognostic factors and PE-LDVT or NLDVT. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between PE-LDVT or NLDVT and 90-day mortality. Results A total of 2208 patients were included. The prevalence of any venous thromboembolism during 3 months before ICU admission was 3.6% (95% CI 2.8–4.4%). Out of 2166 patients, 47 (2.2%; 95% CI 1.6–2.9%) developed PE-LDVT and 38 patients (1.8%; 95% CI 1.2–2.4%) developed NLDVT. Renal replacement therapy (OR 3.5 95% CI 1.4–8.6), respiratory failure (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1–3.8), and previous VTE (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.7–7.7) were associated with PE-LDVT. Central venous catheters (OR 5.4; 95% CI 1.7–17.8) and infection (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1–4.3) were associated with NLDVT. Occurrence of PE-LDVT but not NLDVT was associated with increased 90-day mortality (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.6–4.6, respectively, 0.92; 95% CI 0.41–2.1). Conclusion Thrombotic events are common in critically ill patients, both before and after ICU admittance. Development of PE-LDVT but not NLDVT was associated with increased mortality. Prognostic factors for developing PE-LDVT or NLDVT despite prophylaxis can be identified at ICU admission and may be used to select patients at higher risk in future randomized clinical trials. Trial registration NCT03773939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben J Eck
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Lisa Hulshof
- Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Critical Care, Treant Zorggroep Emmen, Emmen, The Netherlands
| | - Renske Wiersema
- Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H L Thio
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Hiemstra
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Reinold O B Gans
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Karina Meijer
- Department of Haematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Keus
- Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ariës MJH, van den Bergh JP, Beudel M, Boersma W, Dormans T, Douma RA, Eerens A, Elbers PWG, Fleuren LM, Gritters van den Oever NC, de Haan L, van der Horst IJCC, Hu S, Hubers D, Janssen MLF, de Kruif M, Kubben PL, van Kuijk SMJ, Noordzij PG, Ottenhoff M, Piña-Fuentes DAI, Potters WV, Reidinga AC, Renckens RSC, Rigter S, Rusch D, Schinkel M, Sigaloff KCE, Simsek S, Stassen P, Stassen R, Thomas RM, van Wingen GA, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Welling M, Wiersinga WJ, Wolvers MDJ, Wyers CE. [Clinical course of COVID-19 in the Netherlands: an overview of 2607 patients in hospital during the first wave]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2021; 165:D5085. [PMID: 33651497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically collect clinical data from patients with a proven COVID-19 infection in the Netherlands. DESIGN Data from 2579 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 10 Dutch centers in the period February to July 2020 are described. The clinical data are based on the WHO COVID case record form (CRF) and supplemented with patient characteristics of which recently an association disease severity has been reported. METHODS Survival analyses were performed as primary statistical analysis. These Kaplan-Meier curves for time to (early) death (3 weeks) have been determined for pre-morbid patient characteristics and clinical, radiological and laboratory data at hospital admission. RESULTS Total in-hospital mortality after 3 weeks was 22.2% (95% CI: 20.7% - 23.9%), hospital mortality within 21 days was significantly higher for elderly patients (> 70 years; 35, 0% (95% CI: 32.4% - 37.8%) and patients who died during the 21 days and were admitted to the intensive care (36.5% (95% CI: 32.1% - 41.3%)). Apart from that, in this Dutch population we also see a risk of early death in patients with co-morbidities (such as chronic neurological, nephrological and cardiac disorders and hypertension), and in patients with more home medication and / or with increased urea and creatinine levels. CONCLUSION Early death due to a COVID-19 infection in the Netherlands appears to be associated with demographic variables (e.g. age), comorbidity (e.g. cardiovascular disease) but also disease char-acteristics at admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shi Hu
- Universiteit van Amsterdam
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peters EJ, Collard D, Van Assen S, Beudel M, Bomers MK, Buijs J, De Haan LR, De Ruijter W, Douma RA, Elbers PW, Goorhuis A, Gritters van den Oever NC, Knarren LG, Moeniralam HS, Mostard RL, Quanjel MJ, Reidinga AC, Renckens R, Van Den Bergh JP, Vlasveld IN, Sikkens JJ. Outcomes of persons with coronavirus disease 2019 in hospitals with and without standard treatment with (hydroxy)chloroquine. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 27:264-268. [PMID: 33068758 PMCID: PMC7554450 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Objective To compare survival of individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treated in hospitals that either did or did not routinely treat patients with hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine. Methods We analysed data of COVID-19 patients treated in nine hospitals in the Netherlands. Inclusion dates ranged from 27 February to 15 May 2020, when the Dutch national guidelines no longer supported the use of (hydroxy)chloroquine. Seven hospitals routinely treated patients with (hydroxy)chloroquine, two hospitals did not. Primary outcome was 21-day all-cause mortality. We performed a survival analysis using log-rank test and Cox regression with adjustment for age, sex and covariates based on premorbid health, disease severity and the use of steroids for adult respiratory distress syndrome, including dexamethasone. Results Among 1949 individuals, 21-day mortality was 21.5% in 1596 patients treated in hospitals that routinely prescribed (hydroxy)chloroquine, and 15.0% in 353 patients treated in hospitals that did not. In the adjusted Cox regression models this difference disappeared, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.09 (95% CI 0.81–1.47). When stratified by treatment actually received in individual patients, the use of (hydroxy)chloroquine was associated with an increased 21-day mortality (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.24–2.02) in the full model. Conclusions After adjustment for confounders, mortality was not significantly different in hospitals that routinely treated patients with (hydroxy)chloroquine compared with hospitals that did not. We compared outcomes of hospital strategies rather than outcomes of individual patients to reduce the chance of indication bias. This study adds evidence against the use of (hydroxy)chloroquine in hospitalised patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar Jg Peters
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Didier Collard
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sander Van Assen
- Treant Zorggroep, Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, Emmen, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Beudel
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marije K Bomers
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline Buijs
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Heerlen/Sittard, the Netherlands
| | - Lianne R De Haan
- Flevoziekenhuis, Department of Internal Medicine, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter De Ruijter
- Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Intensive Care Unit, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - Renée A Douma
- Flevoziekenhuis, Department of Internal Medicine, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Wg Elbers
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Abraham Goorhuis
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Lieve Ghh Knarren
- Viecuri MC Noord-Limburg, Department of Internal Medicine, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | - Hazra S Moeniralam
- St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Department of Internal Medicine and Intensive Care Unit, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Remy Lm Mostard
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Pulmonology, Heerlen/Sittard, the Netherlands
| | - Marian Jr Quanjel
- St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Department of Pulmonology, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Auke C Reidinga
- Martini Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Roos Renckens
- Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Department of Internal Medicine, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | | | - Imro N Vlasveld
- Martini Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Groningen, the Netherlands; Martini Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jonne J Sikkens
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|