1
|
Prater AR, McConnell JT, Yedulla NR, Peterson EL, Banka TR, Day CS. The Impact of Experience Versus Decision Aids on Patient Preference Toward Virtual Care. Telemed Rep 2024; 5:59-66. [PMID: 38558954 PMCID: PMC10979688 DOI: 10.1089/tmr.2024.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Virtual care utilization has increased in recent years bringing questions of how to best inform patients regarding their use. Decision aids (DAs) are tools created to assist patients in making informed decisions about their health care. This study seeks to determine whether a DA or previous experience could better educate and influence patient's preference on virtual care. Methods One hundred fifty participants from an orthopedic clinic of a multi-hospital system were divided into three groups. Group 1 (Virtual Care Cohort) had at least one previous virtual care visit and was surveyed with the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ). Group 2 (In-person with Decision Aid) and Group 3 (In-person without Decision Aid) had no virtual care experience. Group 2 received a validated virtual care DA with a knowledge test. Both groups were also administered the TSQ. Results After the DA, patients improved their score on 3 of 4 virtual care knowledge questions. Each cohort demonstrated a positive perception of virtual care; however, the specific reasons for their favorable views varied. The DA cohort did not show increased preference toward virtual care compared with the non-DA group and only responded significantly higher regarding encounter comfort. Patients with previous experience in virtual care responded most favorably to the majority of survey questions regarding their virtual care preferences when compared with both virtual care naive cohorts. Discussion and Conclusion We found that patient experience was the most important factor in influencing patient preference toward virtual care. Although the DA increased their virtual care knowledge it did not increase their preference; therefore, efforts should be placed at encouraging patient to experience virtual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron R. Prater
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Jack T. McConnell
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Nikhil R. Yedulla
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Trevor R. Banka
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Charles S. Day
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yedulla NR, Mehta N, Bernstein DN, Cross AG, Elhage KG, Moutzouros V, Makhni EC. When Do Patients Achieve PROMIS Milestones After Rotator Cuff Repair? Orthop J Sports Med 2024; 12:23259671241231608. [PMID: 38510320 PMCID: PMC10953020 DOI: 10.1177/23259671241231608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Given the variability of the questions asked, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) computer adaptive test (CAT) Version 2.0 item bank aids in the evaluation of rotator cuff repair (RCR) rehabilitation by determining when recovery milestones are possible based on the quality of patient responses at certain time points. Purpose To assess the time point at which patients with RCR were able to achieve specific functional milestones, determined as positive responses to the 5 most frequently asked items on the PROMIS UE CAT Version 2.0. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods The postoperative PROMIS UE CAT Version 2.0 scores of patients who underwent RCR between February 16, 2017, and July 30, 2019, were reviewed with respect to individual PROMIS item, response, and timing of response. A functional milestone was considered achieved if the patient response was "without any difficulty" or "with a little difficulty" to any of the 5 most frequently asked PROMIS items. The percentage of patients in each monthlong postoperative interval who answered with either response was recorded. The logit generalized estimating equations method was used to analyze the association between milestone achievement for each PROMIS item and predictor variables (age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, race, ethnicity, and employment status). Results A total of 1131 responses from 371 patients were included. The majority of patients attained milestone achievement on 4 of the 5 most frequently asked PROMIS items at time points ranging from 1 to 5 months postoperatively: "Are you able to carry a shopping bag or briefcase?" (by 1 month), "Are you able to put on and take off a coat or jacket?" (by 3 months), "Are you able to pour liquid from a bottle into a glass?" (by 3 months), and "Are you able to carry a heavy object (over 10 pounds/5 kg)?" (by 5 months). For the item "Are you able to put on a shirt or blouse?", the majority of patients did not achieve the milestone by 1 year. Conclusion These findings support the application of PROMIS UE CAT Version 2.0 milestone achievement in the shared decision-making process and postoperative monitoring, as patients can use this information to determine when they can return to certain activities and providers can apply these standards to identify patients needing additional clinical support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R. Yedulla
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Nabil Mehta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David N. Bernstein
- Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Austin G. Cross
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Kareem G. Elhage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Vasilios Moutzouros
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Eric C. Makhni
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keith KM, Castle JP, Abed V, Wager SG, Patel M, Gaudiani MA, Yedulla NR, Makhni EC. Many patients fail to achieve MCID for PROMIS upper extremity and pain interference following nonoperative management of rotator cuff tears. JSES Int 2023; 7:2337-2343. [PMID: 37969490 PMCID: PMC10638566 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Efficacy of nonoperative treatment for rotator cuff tears has been debated, especially for full-thickness tears. The purpose of this study was to a) define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of nonoperative treatment with regard to Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) and upper extremity (UE), and b) determine the proportion of patients with both partial and full-thickness tears (PTRCT, FTRCT) who achieve this improvement following initial nonoperative treatment. We hypothesized that >75% of PTRCT and FTRTC patients would achieve MCID for PROMIS PI and UE. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating nonoperatively managed patients with image-confirmed PTRCT and FTRCT. Treatment modalities and follow-up PROMIS scores at least 6 months after their initial visit were recorded. Using a distribution technique, MCID was calculated. Results A total of 111 FTRCT and 68 PTRCT patients were included with at least 6 months of follow-up. At 6 months from initial presentation, the MCID for PROMIS UE was 3.75 and 3.95 for FTRCT and PTRCT patients, respectively. For PROMIS PI, the MCID was 3.35 and 3.90 for FTRCT and PTRCT, respectively. In total, 41% of FTRCT and 41% of PTRCT achieved MCID for PROMIS UE. Thirty-four percent of FTRCT and 35% of PTRCT achieved MCID for PROMIS PI. Conclusion The majority of patients undergoing nonoperative treatment for supraspinatus/infraspinatus rotator cuff tears did not achieve MCID at 6 months for PROMIS PI (34% for FTRCT and 35% for PTRCT) or UE (41% for FTRCT and 41% for PTRCT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M. Keith
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI USA
| | - Joshua P. Castle
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI USA
| | - Varag Abed
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI USA
| | - Susan G. Wager
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI USA
| | - Mit Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI USA
| | - Michael A. Gaudiani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI USA
| | - Nikhil R. Yedulla
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI USA
| | - Eric C. Makhni
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yedulla NR, Faraj MT, Hazime AA, Gong JH, Tang A, Day CS. Decision Aid on Orthopedic Virtual Care: Patient Preferences in Orthopedic Hand Clinic. Telemed J E Health 2023; 29:1730-1737. [PMID: 37074349 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The objectives of this study are to develop a decision aid for orthopedic patients to decide between virtual or in-person care and assess patient preferences for these modalities in hand clinic. Methods: An orthopedic virtual care decision aid was developed alongside orthopedic surgeons and a virtual care expert. Subject participation involved 5 steps: Orientation, Memory, and Concentration Test (OMCT), knowledge pretest, decision aid, postdecision aid questionnaire, and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) assessment. Patients presenting to hand clinic were initially provided the OMCT to assess decision-making capacity, with those failing excluded. Subjects were then administered a pretest to assess their understanding of virtual and in-person care. Subsequently, the validated decision aid was provided to patients, after which a postdecision aid questionnaire and DCS assessment were administered. Results: This study enrolled 124 patients. Pre- to postdecision aid knowledge test scores increased by 15.3% (p < 0.0001), and the average patient DCS score was 18.6. After reading the decision aid, 47.6% of patients believed that virtual and in-person care provided similar physician interaction, 46.0% felt little difference in effectiveness between the modalities, and 39.5% had no preference for either. Most patients understood their options (79.8%) and were ready to make a care modality decision (65.4%) following decision aid administration. Conclusion: Significant improvements in knowledge scores, strong DCS scores, and high levels of understanding and decision-making readiness support decision aid validity. Hand patients appear to have no consensus preferences for care modality, emphasizing the need for a decision aid to help determine individual care preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R Yedulla
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Majd T Faraj
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA
| | - Alaa A Hazime
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Jung Ho Gong
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Amy Tang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Charles S Day
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
- Michigan State College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yedulla NR, Hester JD, Patel MM, Cross AG, Peterson EL, Makhni EC. Pre-Visit Digital Messaging Improves Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Participation Prior to the Orthopaedic Ambulatory Visit: Results from a Double-Blinded, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:20-26. [PMID: 36598473 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.00506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are metrics that assess physical health, mental health, pain, and satisfaction. However, PROM collection in orthopaedic clinics presents numerous logistical and financial challenges. These challenges are reduced when PROMs are completed before clinic encounters, relieving the workflow constraints of in-office PROM collection. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of 3 different methods with respect to pre-visit electronic PROM completion. METHODS Consecutive adult orthopaedic patients with no previous PROM participation were enrolled. Patients who registered with the electronic medical record (EMR) patient portal (MyChart) and with active e-mail addresses were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 arms: control (no pre-visit messages), MyChart (EMR patient portal pre-visit messages), and e-mail (e-mail pre-visit messages). The primary outcome measure was pre-visit PROM completion rates in orthopaedic patients, and the secondary outcome measures were time to pre-visit PROM form completion and PROM form completion rates according to patient demographic characteristics. By default, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) forms were available for completion through the portal by 7 days before scheduled visits. Pre-visit messages were sent 7 days prior to the scheduled visit except in the control group, with reminders sent 3 days prior if still not completed. The patients in each arm who completed all assigned forms were labeled as having total PROM completion, and those who completed at least 1 completed form were considered as having partial PROM completion. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess differences in PROM completion rates between study arms. Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to compare the date of the form completion. RESULTS A total of 291 patients were included. The pre-visit total completion rates for assigned PROMs were higher in the MyChart arm (49% of 97 patients; p = 0.005) and the e-mail arm (52% of 100 patients; p = 0.002) in comparison with the control arm (30% of 94 patients). Male patients were more likely than female patients to have partial pre-visit PROM completion (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; p = 0.03), and Caucasian patients were more likely to have partial pre-visit PROM completion than African American patients (OR, 2.28; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Orthopaedic patients receiving either e-mail or patient portal messages demonstrated higher pre-visit PROM completion rates. Pre-visit messaging appears to be a useful strategy for increasing PROM completion rates and limiting the clinical workflow strain imposed by in-clinic PROM administration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R Yedulla
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yedulla NR, Olszewski A, Elhage KG, Makhni MC. Online access to spine care: do institutions advertise themselves as multidisciplinary? J Spine Surg 2022; 8:436-442. [PMID: 36606000 PMCID: PMC9808106 DOI: 10.21037/jss-22-38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background The primary aim of our study is to assess the extent to which healthcare systems advertise their spine care programs as multidisciplinary and furthermore clarify whether these institutions accurately reflect this description in their online access to spine care. The secondary aim of our study is to determine what proportion of institutions enable patients to self-schedule appointments online and select providers. Methods Newsweek's 2021 list entitled "Best Hospitals 2021-United States" was utilized to obtain an extensive list of top-rated hospitals in the country. Institutions were considered to be advertising themselves as multidisciplinary if they used this term or similar wording (such as "care encompassing broad range of specialties", "interdisciplinary", "multidisciplinary"). Each institution's website was additionally assessed for the existence of: (I) a standard overview website or multiple individual sites for respective spine-focused divisions (i.e., orthopaedic surgery, neurosurgery, physical medicine and rehabilitation, anesthesiology); (II) online self-scheduling; (III) triage questions prior to requesting appointments; and (IV) selection choice for specific providers. Results In total, 334 institutions were included in analysis, with 66% utilizing multidisciplinary terminology in describing their institution on their website. However, most institutions only had a standard overview website with no separate websites for respective divisions (54%). Institutions described as multidisciplinary were more likely to have a link on a central page to each division (31% vs. 4%, P<0.001). No significant differences were found between institutions described as multidisciplinary and those not described as such when considering triage questions, online self-scheduling, and choice of provider. Conclusions Though the majority of spine care centers are described as multidisciplinary, the patient experience when navigating websites online does not always meet this standard. Further progress in website design, automated triaging, and online scheduling are needed to truly achieve multidisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R. Yedulla
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Adam Olszewski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Kareem G. Elhage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Melvin C. Makhni
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cross AG, Yedulla NR, Ziedas AC, Elhage KG, Guo EW, Hessburg LT, Moutzouros V, Muh SJ, Makhni EC. Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Exist Between Day of Surgical Scheduling and Day of Surgery. Arthroscopy 2022; 38:139-144. [PMID: 34126217 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores among orthopedic sports medicine patients undergoing surgery who completed PROMIS forms both in the ambulatory (preoperative) setting at the time of surgical scheduling, as well as on the day of surgery (perioperative) prior to their procedure. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing various sports medicine-related surgeries were recruited. Patients were included if they were scheduled for surgery and completed preoperative PROMIS on the day of surgical scheduling and on the day of surgery. Patients were excluded if they refused the questionnaire or had been administered perioperative anesthesia, which would interfere with questionnaire completion. Paired samples t-tests were run between preoperative and perioperative PROMIS scores to determine statistical significance. RESULTS 153 patients were included with an average age of 46.5 years. The average (SD) time between completion of PROMIS questionnaires was 46.5 (44.4) days. The absolute value change in scores between preoperative and perioperative visits was 4.09 for PROMIS UE, 3.59 for PROMIS PF, 3.67 for PROMIS PI, and 4.13 for PROMIS D. The overall net change of scores between preoperative and perioperative visits were -.57 for PROMIS UE CAT, .16 points for PROMIS PF CAT, -.85 points for PROMIS PI CAT, and -2.14 points for PROMIS D CAT. Statistically significant differences in preoperative and perioperative PROMIS PI (P =.042) and PROMIS D (P =.004) scores were found. CONCLUSIONS Health states-as measured by PROMIS CAT forms completed among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery-can either improve or worsen preoperatively between the time of administration in both the ambulatory and perioperative setting. Despite the existence of these preoperative trends, it is important to consider patient and surgery-specific causes, such as the anatomic region, type of surgical intervention, and timing of preoperative PROMIS administration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, prognostic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin G Cross
- Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, U.S.A
| | - Nikhil R Yedulla
- Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, U.S.A
| | - Alexander C Ziedas
- Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, U.S.A
| | - Kareem G Elhage
- Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, U.S.A
| | - Eric W Guo
- Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, U.S.A
| | - Luke T Hessburg
- Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, U.S.A
| | - Vasilios Moutzouros
- Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, U.S.A
| | - Stephanie J Muh
- Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, U.S.A
| | - Eric C Makhni
- Henry Ford Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Detroit, Michigan, 48202, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guo EW, Yedulla NR, Cross AG, Hessburg LT, Elhage KG, Koolmees DS, Makhni EC. Older, Male Orthopaedic Surgeons From Southern Geographies Prescribe Higher Doses of Post-Operative Narcotics Than do their Counterparts: A Medicare Population Study. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e1577-e1583. [PMID: 34977609 PMCID: PMC8689220 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods Results Conclusion Level of Evidence
Collapse
|
9
|
Yedulla NR, Tramer JS, Koolmees DS, Franovic S, Elhage KG, Moutzouros V, Makhni EC. Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Testing (PROMIS CAT) Scores Predict Achievement of Minimum Clinically Important Difference Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Anchor-Based Methodology. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3:e1891-e1898. [PMID: 34977645 PMCID: PMC8689251 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Testing (PROMIS CAT) scores for physical function, pain interference, and depression that constitute minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using an anchor-based technique and to identify pre-operative clinical thresholds in anchor-based MCID that predict likelihood of achieving MCID following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS Adult patients aged 18 years or older undergoing ACL reconstruction that completed both preoperative and postoperative PROMIS CAT assessments and an anchor-based questionnaire were identified over a 23-month period. Anchor-based MCID was determined for PROMIS CAT forms for physical function (PROMIS PF CAT), pain interference (PROMIS PI CAT), and depression (PROMIS D CAT). RESULTS A total of 137 patients were included for statistical analysis, with pre-operative PROMIS CAT forms completed 27.9 ± 31.2 days before surgery and 492.5 ± 219.9 days postoperatively on average. Statistically significant improvements were observed for all PROMIS CAT domains. PROMIS PF CAT improved from 39.5 ± 8.2 to 55.0 ± 9.7 (P < .0005), PROMIS PI CAT from 59.8 ± 7.2 to 48.2 ± 8.3 (P < .0005), and PROMIS D CAT from 47.9 ± 8.8 to 41.5 ± 8.6 (P < .0005). Anchor-based MCID for each PROMIS CAT form was calculated to be +4.5, -5.4, and -4.1 for PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS PI CAT, and PROMIS D CAT, respectively. Mean difference between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS CAT scores exceeded MCID for all domains. The percentage of patients achieving MCID for PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS PI CAT, and PROMIS D CAT was 85%, 72%, and 55%, respectively. After introduction of 95% specificity cutoffs, the percentage of patients achieving MCID for PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS PI CAT, and PROMIS D CAT increased to 100% (<35.6 cutoff score), 92% (>65.7 cutoff score), and 83% (>57.5 cutoff score), respectively. CONCLUSIONS According to anchor-based analysis of PROMIS CAT MCID, ACL reconstruction is effective in improving physical function, pain interference, and depression symptoms. In addition, preoperative PROMIS CAT scores can predict the likelihood of achieving MCID postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, prognostic case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R Yedulla
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Joseph S Tramer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Dylan S Koolmees
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Sreten Franovic
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Kareem G Elhage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Vasilios Moutzouros
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Eric C Makhni
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yedulla NR, Faraj MT, Koolmees DS, Battista EB, Montgomery ZA, Day CS. Assessing Orthopedic Patient Preferences for Mandated Virtual Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Elective Virtual Care in Non-Pandemic Circumstances. Orthopedics 2021; 44:e471-e476. [PMID: 34292825 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20210618-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare orthopedic patient preferences for mandated virtual care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and elective virtual care during non-pandemic circumstances. An orthopedic virtual care questionnaire was administered to adult orthopedic patients undergoing their first orthopedic virtual visit between March 15, 2020, and May 18, 2020. The questionnaire had 13 items rated on a 1-to-5 Likert scale ("strongly agree" to "strongly disagree"). Responses were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Patients showed higher preferences for mandated virtual care during the pandemic when compared with elective virtual care during non-pandemic circumstances (2.25±1.31 vs 4.10±1.25, P<.0001) and also preferred virtual visits in other specialties compared with orthopedics (2.17±1.35 vs 2.79±1.42, P<.0001). Patients older than 50 years were more likely to view virtual care as the best option during the pandemic (2.06±1.25 vs 2.48±1.35, P<.0165) and equally as effective as in-person visits in non-pandemic circumstances (2.45±1.36 vs 2.83±1.18, P<.0150). Female patients were more likely to pursue future orthopedic virtual visits (2.61±1.37 vs 3.07±1.45, P<.0203) and view their virtual visit as equally effective as an in-person visit (2.47±1.33 vs 2.87±1.18, P<.0181). Orthopedic patient preference for mandated virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic seems to be higher than for elective virtual care during non-pandemic circumstances, and older and female patients appear to favor virtual care. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e471-e476.].
Collapse
|
11
|
Montgomery ZA, Yedulla NR, Koolmees D, Battista E, Parsons Iii TW, Day CS. Are orthopaedic providers willing to work overtime to address COVID-19-related patient backlogs and financial deficits? Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:562-568. [PMID: 34320326 PMCID: PMC8325977 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.27.bjo-2021-0030.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims COVID-19-related patient care delays have resulted in an unprecedented patient care backlog in the field of orthopaedics. The objective of this study is to examine orthopaedic provider preferences regarding the patient care backlog and financial recovery initiatives in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods An orthopaedic research consortium at a multi-hospital tertiary care academic medical system developed a three-part survey examining provider perspectives on strategies to expand orthopaedic patient care and financial recovery. Section 1 asked for preferences regarding extending clinic hours, section 2 assessed surgeon opinions on expanding surgical opportunities, and section 3 questioned preferred strategies for departmental financial recovery. The survey was sent to the institution’s surgical and nonoperative orthopaedic providers. Results In all, 73 of 75 operative (n = 55) and nonoperative (n = 18) providers responded to the survey. A total of 92% of orthopaedic providers (n = 67) were willing to extend clinic hours. Most providers preferred extending clinic schedule until 6pm on weekdays. When asked about extending surgical block hours, 96% of the surgeons (n = 53) were willing to extend operating room (OR) block times. Most surgeons preferred block times to be extended until 7pm (63.6%, n = 35). A majority of surgeons (53%, n = 29) believe that over 50% of their surgical cases could be performed at an ambulatory surgery centre (ASC). Of the strategies to address departmental financial deficits, 85% of providers (n = 72) were willing to work extra hours without a pay cut. Conclusion Most orthopaedic providers are willing to help with patient care backlogs and revenue recovery by working extended hours instead of having their pay reduced. These findings provide insights that can be incorporated into COVID-19 recovery strategies. Level of Evidence: III Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):562–568.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Montgomery
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Nikhil R Yedulla
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Dylan Koolmees
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Eric Battista
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Charles S Day
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health Systems, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yedulla NR, Montgomery ZA, Koolmees DS, Battista EB, Day CS. Orthopaedic provider perceptions of virtual care : which providers prefer virtual care? Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:405-410. [PMID: 34155903 PMCID: PMC8244795 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.26.bjo-2020-0198.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The purpose of our study was to determine which groups of orthopaedic providers favour virtual care, and analyze overall orthopaedic provider perceptions of virtual care. We hypothesize that providers with less clinical experience will favour virtual care, and that orthopaedic providers overall will show increased preference for virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic and decreased preference during non-pandemic circumstances. METHODS An orthopaedic research consortium at an academic medical system developed a survey examining provider perspectives regarding orthopaedic virtual care. Survey items were scored on a 1 to 5 Likert scale (1 = "strongly disagree", 5 = "strongly agree") and compared using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS Providers with less experience were more likely to recommend virtual care for follow-up visits (3.61 on the Likert scale (SD 0.95) vs 2.90 (SD 1.23); p = 0.006) and feel that virtual care was essential to patient wellbeing (3.98 (SD 0.95) vs 3.00 (SD 1.16); p < 0.001) during the pandemic. Less experienced providers also viewed virtual visits as providing a similar level of care as in-person visits (2.41 (SD 1.02) vs 1.76 (SD 0.87); p = 0.006) and more time-efficient than in-person visits (3.07 (SD 1.19) vs 2.34 (SD 1.14); p = 0.012) in non-pandemic circumstances. During the pandemic, most providers viewed virtual care as effective in providing essential care (83.6%, n = 51) and wanted to schedule patients for virtual care follow-up (82.2%, n = 50); only 10.9% (n = 8) of providers preferred virtual visits in non-pandemic circumstances. CONCLUSION Orthopaedic providers with less clinical experience seem to favourably view virtual care both during the pandemic and under non-pandemic circumstances. Providers in general appear to view virtual care positively during the pandemic but are less accommodating towards it in non-pandemic circumstances. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(6):405-410.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R Yedulla
- Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Zachary A Montgomery
- Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Dylan S Koolmees
- Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Eric B Battista
- Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Charles S Day
- Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Battista EB, Yedulla NR, Koolmees DS, Montgomery ZA, Ravi K, Day CS. Manufacturing Workers Have a Higher Incidence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Occup Environ Med 2021; 63:e120-e126. [PMID: 33394876 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is unclear whether clerical or labor-type work is more associated with risk for developing work-related carpal tunnel syndrome (WrCTS). METHODS National employment, demographic, and injury data were examined from the Bureau of Labor Statistics databases for the years 2003 to 2018. Injuries for clerical and labor industries were compared using linear regression, two-group t test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis. RESULTS WrCTS injuries are decreasing over time (B = -1002.62, P < 0.001). The labor industry demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of WrCTS when compared with the clerical industries (P < 0.001). Within labor industries, the manufacturing industry had the highest incidence of WrCTS over time (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our study showed WrCTS injuries have declined over time. Additionally, our findings may suggest that the labor industry has a stronger association with WrCTS than the clerical industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric B Battista
- Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan (Dr Day); Wayne State University School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI (Mr Battista, Mr Yedulla, Mr Koolmees, Mr Montgomery, Dr Day); University of Michigan (Mr Ravi), Detroit, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tramer JS, Cross AG, Yedulla NR, Guo EW, Makhni EC. Comprehensive Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization in the Lateral Decubitus Position. Arthrosc Tech 2020; 9:e1601-e1606. [PMID: 33134067 PMCID: PMC7587928 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization offers a safe and effective means for restoring glenohumeral mechanics in the setting of shoulder instability. Modern arthroscopic techniques have allowed improved access and efficiency when treating patients with shoulder instability. However, access to certain areas of the labrum and the creation of safe accessory portals can still prove difficult for the arthroscopic surgeon. Currently, there is debate as to the ideal patient position, portal location, equipment, and technique for addressing anterior-inferior labral pathology. The following article presents a safe and effective approach to accessing the labrum for treatment of shoulder instability in the lateral decubitus position. In addition, this paper highlights the use of accessory portals, including a percutaneous "7-o'clock" portal for suture anchor placement, along with multiple types of suture anchor and suture shuttling techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Eric C. Makhni
- Address correspondence to Eric C. Makhni, M.D, M.B.A., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202.
| |
Collapse
|