Community-Based Point-of-Diagnosis Hepatitis C Treatment for Marginalized Populations: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Disparities persist in testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV), leaving socially marginalized populations less likely to benefit from curative treatment. Linkage services are often insufficient to overcome barriers to navigating the medical system and contextual factors.

Objective

To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of HCV treatment at the point of HCV infection diagnosis disclosure in a nonclinical community setting.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this single-arm nonrandomized controlled trial conducted between July 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, street-outreach recruitment targeted people experiencing homelessness and injecting drugs in an urban US community who were eligible for simplified HCV treatment.

Interventions

Study procedures were designed to reflect the community environment and services needed to provide HCV testing, disclosure, and treatment in a nonclinical site. The test-and-treat No One Waits (NOW) model of care provided a 2-week starter pack of 400 mg of sofosbuvir and 100 mg of velpatasvir at time of HCV RNA results disclosure. Participants were transitioned to insurance-provided sofosbuvir-velpatasvir when feasible to complete a 12-week treatment course.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 or later (SVR12). Acceptability end points were treatment initiation and completion. Safety end points were treatment discontinuation because of a late exclusion criterion and adverse events.

Results

Of the 492 people (median [IQR] age, 48 [37-58] years; 62 [71%] male) who underwent anti-HCV testing, 246 (50%) tested anti-HCV positive, and 111 (23%) tested HCV RNA positive and were eligible for simplified HCV treatment. Eighty-nine of the 111 eligible participants (80%) returned for confirmatory RNA results, and 87 (98%) accepted and initiated HCV treatment. Seventy (80%) were currently injecting drugs, 83 (97%) had an income below the poverty line, and 53 (61%) were currently unsheltered. Most had HCV genotype 1a (45 [52%]) or 3 (20 [23%]). Sixty-nine (79%) completed 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir treatment, 2 stopped treatment because of low adherence, and 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 66 participants who completed treatment and had a successful blood draw, 61 (92%) had undetectable HCV RNA at treatment completion. Of the 87 treated patients, 58 achieved SVR12, leading to a treatment response of 67% (95% CI, 56%-76%) among the intention-to-treat group and 84% (95% CI, 73%-92%) among the per-protocol group. There were no adverse events, late exclusions, or deaths.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this nonrandomized controlled trial of HCV treatment at the point of diagnosis, the NOW model of care reduced steps between HCV testing and treatment initiation and resulted in high levels of treatment initiation, completion, and cure. The NOW model of care can expand the current HCV test-and-treat toolkit by reaching a broader population of marginalized communities and expediting curative therapy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03987503.

Naloxone distribution and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for injection drug users to prevent heroin overdose death: a pilot intervention study

Fatal heroin overdose has become a leading cause of death among injection drug users (IDUs). Several recent feasibility studies have concluded that naloxone distribution programs for heroin injectors should be implemented to decrease heroin over-dose deaths, but there have been no prospective trials of such programs in North America. This pilot study was undertaken to investigate the safety and feasibility of training injection drug using partners to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and administer naloxone in the event of heroin overdose. During May and June 2001, 24 IDUs (12 pairs of injection partners) were recruited from street settings in San Francisco. Participants took part in 8-hour training in heroin overdose prevention, CPR, and the use of naloxone. Following the intervention, participants were prospectively followed for 6 months to determine the number and outcomes of witnessed heroin overdoses, outcomes of participant interventions, and changes in participants' knowledge of overdose and drug use behavior. Study participants witnessed 20 heroin overdose events during 6 months follow-up. They performed CPR in 16 (80%) events, administered naloxone in 15 (75%) and did one or the other in 19 (95%). All overdose victims survived. Knowledge about heroin overdose management increased, whereas heroin use decreased. IDUs can be trained to respond to heroin overdose emergencies by performing CPR and administering naloxone. Future research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this peer intervention to prevent fatal heroin overdose.

Secondary syringe exchange among injection drug users

Syringe-exchange programs (SEPs) have proven to prevent the spread of bloodborne pathogens, primarily human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), among injection drug users (IDUs). In the United States, only about 7% of IDUs have access to and use SEPs. Some IDUs engage in secondary syringe exchange (SSE), meaning that one IDU (a "provider") obtains syringes at an SEP to distribute to other IDUs ("recipients"). This formative qualitative research was conducted to understand why and how IDUs engage in SSE to aid in the development of a large-scale peer HIV prevention intervention. Interviews with 47 IDUs in Oakland and Richmond, California, indicated that SSE was embedded in existing social networks, which provided natural opportunities for peer education. SSE providers reported a desire to help other IDUs as their primary motivation, while recipients reported convenience as their primary reason for using SSE. Building SSE into SEP structures can facilitate an effective provision of risk reduction supplies and information to IDUs who do not access SEPs directly.