A Clinical Framework for Video Head Impulse Testing and Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Assessments in Primary School-Aged Children

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to offer normative data and age trends of an age-appropriate vestibular test protocol in a large group (n = 140) of school-aged children (6 to 13 years old) as well as to provide a practical and clinical framework for accurate performance and interpretation of vestibular test results in this specific age group.

DESIGN

The typically developing participants (mean age of 9.51 ± 2.04 years) were recruited to provide a representative group of 20 children for each of the seven age groups that were composed of children aged from 6 to 13 years in 1-year intervals. Each age group consisted of 10 boys and 10 girls. The protocol comprises the video head impulse test, and cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential assessments to provide a child-friendly, noninvasive, short, and portable test battery, which is equally applicable in the hospital and office-practice, and which provides information on the integrity of all five parts of the peripheral vestibular system.

RESULTS

The study demonstrates that all included tests and methods, with an overall test duration of 25 min 12 sec ± 5 min 10 sec, were feasible to perform in primary school-aged children, taking into account some practical adaptations. Concerning the video head impulse test, no clinically relevant sex and age effects were noted. However, t tests revealed significant differences for the mean gain of the horizontal (right > left; t[139] = 14.563; p < 0.001) and posterior semicircular canals (left > right; t[139] = -4.823; p < 0.001) between both sides. For the cVEMP assessment, no laterality differences were observed for any of the parameters, but a significantly shorter N1 latencies in the youngest age categories (<8 years), compared with the oldest groups were observed [F(6,118) = 8.336; p < 0.001; partial ƞ² = 0.298]. For all oVEMP parameters, no laterality, sex, or age differences were seen. On the basis of the presented normative data, cutoff criteria were proposed with accompanying clinical recommendations to perform vestibular function testing in this target population.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study in a large group of school-aged children offering normative data and age trends of an age-appropriate vestibular test protocol that evaluates the integrity of all parts of the peripheral vestibular organ. The reported normative values and clinical cutoff values will enable appropriate and age-specific interpretation of clinical and scientific results. Moreover, in combination with extensive history taking, and additional vestibular testing (e.g., rotatory chair test, caloric testing) when needed, the results of this study may support clinicians in the diagnosis of side-specific and location-specific vestibular deficits, which is required for accurate counseling and referral for further follow-up and/or intervention.

A cross-sectional study on the neurocognitive outcomes in vestibular impaired school-aged children: are they at higher risk for cognitive deficits?

This study aimed to assess if children with a vestibular impairment (VI) are more prone to have neurocognitive deficits compared to typically developing (TD) peers, taking into account important confounding factors with hearing loss being the most important. The neurocognitive performance of fifteen VI children (6-13 years old) was compared to that of an age-, handedness- and sex-weighted group of TD peers (n = 60). Secondly, their performance was also compared to matched groups of TD and hearing impaired (HI) children to evaluate the involvement of HI. The protocol comprises cognitive tests assessing response inhibition, emotion recognition, visuospatial memory, selective and sustained attention, visual memory and visual-motor integration.Based on the results, the VI group had significantly reduced scores on 'social cognition' (p = 0.018), 'executive functions' (p < 0.01), and 'perceptual-motor functioning' (p = 0.020) compared to their TD and HI peers. For the categories 'complex attention' and 'learning and memory' no differences could be observed. Analogous to the findings of previous literature, the symptoms of a VI are often not limited to the primary functions of the system, but also comprise an impact on emotional and cognitive performance. Therefore, more holistic rehabilitation approaches should be encouraged, with a screening and attention for cognitive, emotional and behavioral dysfunctions in the vestibular population. Since this is one of the first studies to investigate the involvement of a VI in a child's cognitive development, these findings support the need for studies further characterizing the impact of a VI, the underlying pathophysiology and the effect of different rehabilitation procedures.

Self-Reported Cycling Performance and Impact on Falls in Persons With Bilateral Vestibulopathy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate cycling skills, cycling difficulties, fall concern, and fall history while cycling in persons with bilateral vestibulopathy.

DESIGN

Fifty-one persons with bilateral vestibulopathy and 51 healthy control subjects filled out a questionnaire about cycling abilities. This questionnaire consisted of four parts: (1) general information about audiovestibular function, vision, and physical activity; (2) general cycling abilities, history, and difficulties; (3) fall concern while cycling in various situations; and (4) fall history.

RESULTS

Out of the 51 patients, 61% found riding a bicycle difficult, 29% were not able to cycle anymore, and 10% reported not having any problems riding a bicycle. Their mean cycling time decreased from 3.15 hrs weekly before to 1.27 hrs weekly after disease onset ( p = 0.002). The latter also differed significantly from the mean cycling time of 3.51 hrs weekly in control subjects ( p < 0.001). The main complaints while cycling were not being able to look behind (88%), having difficulties with visually stabilizing the environment (65%), and not being able to ride in a straight line (61%). The fall concern was significantly higher in the patient group, with cycling in the dark and at dusk, and turning the head as their main concerns ( p < 0.001). Falls and near-falls were respectively reported in 50% and 65% of the patient group. Only the latter differed significantly from the control group. However, the number of reported falls differed significantly between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates cycling difficulties in persons with bilateral vestibulopathy, related to problems with postural control and gaze stabilization. Knowledge about specific complaints and triggers is important to prevent future falls. A combination of coping strategies and aids, with vestibular rehabilitation focused on gaze stabilization might be considered, as well as avoidance of cycling in specific cases.

The impact of vestibular function on cognitive-motor interference: a case-control study on dual-tasking in persons with bilateral vestibulopathy and normal hearing

Bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) is a chronic vestibular disorder, characterized by bilaterally absent or significantly impaired vestibular function. Symptoms typically include, but are not limited to, unsteadiness and movement-induced blurred vision (oscillopsia). This prospective case-control study aimed to elucidate the impact of BV on cognitive and motor performance and on cognitive-motor interference. Cognitive and motor performance, as well as cognitive-motor interference were measured in persons with BV and normal hearing using the 2BALANCE dual-task protocol. The experimental group was matched to a healthy control group based on age, sex, and educational level. The 2BALANCE protocol comprises cognitive tests assessing visuospatial memory, mental rotation, visual and auditory response inhibition, visual and auditory working memory, and processing speed. The cognitive tests were performed in single-task condition (while seated), and in dual-task condition (during a static and a dynamic motor task). The static motor task consisted of balancing on a force platform with foam pad. The dynamic motor task consisted of walking at a self-selected speed. These motor tasks were also performed in single-task condition. A generalized estimating equations model was used to investigate group differences for all cognitive and motor outcome measures. The estimated marginal means, as well as the odds ratios (OR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. For the backward digit recall test, a baseline measurement was performed and analyzed using a student-t test. A total of 22 patients with BV and normal hearing and 22 healthy control subjects were assessed [mean age (SD), BV = 53.66 (13.35) and HC = 53.21 (13.35), 68% male]. The BV group had poorer mental rotation skills in single-task condition, compared to the control group [odds ratio (OR) = 2.30, confidence interval (CI) = 1.12-4.73, P  =  0.024]. Similarly, auditory and visual working memory were also poorer in the BV group in single-task condition (P = 0.028 and P = 0.003, respectively). The BV group also performed poorer on the mental rotation task and the visual response inhibition task in dual-task condition (OR = 2.96, CI = 1.57-5.59, P  <  0.001 and OR = 1.08, CI = 1.01-1.16, P  =  0.032, respectively). Additionally, an interaction effect, indicating increased cognitive-motor interference in the BV group, was observed for mental rotation, response inhibition, and auditory working memory (P  =  0.003 to 0.028). All static motor outcome parameters indicated more postural sway in the BV group compared to the control group for all test conditions (P  <  0.001 to 0.026). No group differences were noted for the dynamic motor task. These findings suggest a link between vestibular function and cognitive performance, as well as a greater interference between cognitive and motor performance in BV, compared to healthy controls.

Association of Bilateral Vestibulopathy With and Without Hearing Loss With Cognitive-Motor Interference

Importance

The past years, evidence suggested that the primary symptoms traditionally associated with bilateral vestibulopathy (BV) do not represent the full picture of this patient population. Recent literature also demonstrated cognitive impairment. However, although multitasking and dual-tasking are widely present in everyday activities, most of these studies assessed cognitive function only in single-task conditions.

Objective

To uncover the association of BV with and without hearing loss with cognitive and motor performance and cognitive-motor interference.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective case-control study assessed persons with an isolated BV and persons with BV and a concomitant hearing loss compared with a healthy control group. Data were analyzed in December 2022. The study was conducted at Ghent University (Ghent, Belgium). Data collection took place between March 26, 2021, and November 29, 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All participants completed the 2BALANCE dual-task protocol, comprising a static and a dynamic motor task that was combined with 5 visual cognitive tasks. These cognitive tasks assessed mental rotation, visuospatial memory, working memory, response inhibition (executive function), and processing speed. All cognitive tasks were performed in a single-task condition (while seated) and in a dual-task condition (combined with a static and a dynamic motor task). The static task comprised balancing on a force platform with foam pad, and the dynamic task comprised walking at a self-selected speed on the GAITRite Walkway. Both motor tasks were performed in the single-task and dual-task condition.

Results

Nineteen persons with BV and hearing loss (mean [SD] age, 56.70 [10.12] years; 10 women [52.6%]), 22 persons with an isolated BV (mean [SD] age, 53.66 [13.35] years; 7 women [31.8%]), and 28 healthy control participants were included (mean [SD] age, 53.73 [12.77] years; 12 women [42.9%]). Both patient groups had mental rotation and working memory impairment in a single-task condition and slower processing speed when walking (ie, during the dynamic dual-task condition). Additionally, the patient group with hearing loss had impaired visuospatial memory and executive function deficits in single-task and dual-task conditions, while this could only be elicited when performing a motor task in persons with isolated BV (ie, when dual-tasking).

Conclusion and Relevance

The findings of this case-control study suggest an association between vestibular function and cognitive and motor performance, even greater in persons with a concomitant hearing loss than in persons with an isolated BV.

Vestibular Infant Screening-Flanders: What is the Most Appropriate Vestibular Screening Tool in Hearing-Impaired Children?

OBJECTIVES

As children with sensorineural hearing loss have an increased risk for vestibular impairment, the Vestibular Infant Screening-Flanders project implemented a vestibular screening by means of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) at the age of 6 months for each child with hearing loss in Flanders (Belgium). Given that vestibular deficits can affect the child's development, this vestibular screening should allow early detection and intervention. However, less is currently known about which screening tool would be the most ideal and how vestibular impairment can evolve. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the most appropriate tool to screen for vestibular deficits, to assess the necessity of vestibular follow-up, and to set clinical guidelines for vestibular screening in children with hearing loss.

DESIGN

In total, 71 children with congenital or early-onset sensorineural hearing loss were enrolled (mean age at first appointment = 6.7 months). Follow-up was provided at 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years of age. Below three years of age, the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) of the horizontal semicircular canals (SCC), the cVEMP, and the rotatory test at 0.16, 0.04, and 0.01 Hz were applied. At 3 years of age, the vHIT of the vertical SCC and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) were added. To evaluate early motor development, the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) results at 6 months and 1-year old were included.

RESULTS

At 6 months of age, the highest success rate was obtained with the cVEMP (90.0%) compared to the vHIT (70.0%) and the rotatory test (34.3-72.9%). Overall, vestibular deficits were found in 20.0% of the children, consisting of 13.9% with both SCC and otolith deficits (bilateral: 9.3%, unilateral: 4.6%), and 6.1% with unilateral isolated SCC (4.6%) or otolith (1.5%) deficits. Thus, vestibular deficits would not have been detected in 4.6% of the children by only using the cVEMP, whereas 1.5% would have been missed when only using the vHIT. Although vestibular deficits were more frequently found in severe to profound hearing loss (28.6%), characteristics of vestibular function were highly dependent on the underlying etiology. The AIMS results showed significantly weaker early motor development in children with bilateral vestibular deficits ( p = 0.001), but could not differentiate children with bilateral normal vestibular function from those with unilateral vestibular deficits ( p > 0.05). Progressive or delayed-onset vestibular dysfunction was only found in a few cases (age range: 12-36 months), in which the hearing loss was mainly caused by congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV).

CONCLUSIONS

The cVEMP is the most feasible screening tool to assess vestibular function in 6-months-old children with hearing loss. Although the majority of children with vestibular deficits are detected with the cVEMP, the vHIT seems even more sensitive as isolated SCC deficits are associated with specific etiologies of hearing loss. As a result, the cVEMP is an appropriate vestibular screening tool, which is advised at least in severe to profound hearing loss, but certain etiologies require the addition of the vHIT (i.e., cCMV, meningitis, cochleovestibular anomalies with or without syndromic hearing loss).

2BALANCE: Test-retest reliability of a cognitive-motor dual-task protocol

PURPOSE

Aside from typical symptoms such as dizziness and vertigo, persons with vestibular disorders often have cognitive and motor problems. These symptoms have been assessed in single-task condition. However, dual-tasks assessing cognitive-motor interference might be an added value as they reflect daily life situations better. Therefore, the 2BALANCE protocol was developed. In the current study, the test-retest reliability of this protocol was assessed.

METHODS

The 2BALANCE protocol was performed twice in 20 healthy young adults with an in-between test interval of two weeks. Two motor tasks and five different cognitive tasks were performed in single and dual-task condition. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), the standard error of measurement, and the minimal detectable difference were calculated.

RESULTS

All cognitive tasks, with the exception of the mental rotation task, had favorable reliability results (0.26≤ICC≤0.91). The dynamic motor task indicated overall substantial reliability values in all conditions (0.67≤ICC≤0.98). Similar results were found for the static motor task during dual-tasking (0.50≤ICC≤0.92), but were slightly lower in single-task condition (-0.26≤ICC≤0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2BALANCE protocol was overall consistent across trials. However, the mental rotation task showed lowest reliability values.

Postural balance problems in people with intellectual disabilities: Do not forget the sensory input systems

BACKGROUND

This pilot study aimed to explore the impact of visual, auditory and vestibular dysfunctions on the postural balance performance in adults with intellectual disabilities. Additionally, a comparison was made between the subjects with intellectual disabilities and a control group concerning static and dynamic balance tasks.

METHOD

Thirty adults with intellectual disabilities and 25 control subjects received a postural balance assessment. Additionally, the experimental group was subjected to a visual, auditory and vestibular screening.

RESULTS

The experimental group performed significantly worse and/or showed more sway compared to the control group for all balance tasks (p < .01) except the timed up and go test. Within the experimental group, a significant positive correlation (r_s (24) = 0.513, p = .007) was observed between the number of failed sensory screening items and the number of failed balance tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest significant involvement of peripheral sensorial deficits in the balance problems that people with intellectual disabilities often experience.

Balanced Growth project: a protocol of a single-centre observational study on the involvement of the vestibular system in a child's motor and cognitive development

INTRODUCTION

The involvement of the vestibular system in the motor and higher (cognitive) performances of typically developing or vestibular-impaired children is currently unknown or has only scarcely been explored. Interestingly, arguments for an interaction between vestibular, motor and cognitive functions in children can also be supported by research on children known for their difficulties in motor and/or cognitive processing (eg, children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD)), as they often present with vestibular-like characteristics. Therefore, in order to elucidate this interaction, and to increase the understanding of the pathophysiology and symptomatology of vestibular disorders and NDD in children, the Balanced Growth project was developed. It includes the following objectives: (1) to understand the association between motor skills, cognitive performances and the vestibular function in typically developing school-aged children, with special focus on the added value of the vestibular system in higher cognitive skills and motor competence; (2) to investigate whether a vestibular dysfunction (with/without an additional auditory disease) has an impact on motor skills, cognitive performances and motor-cognitive interactions in children and (3) to assess if an underlying vestibular dysfunction can be identified in school-aged children with NDD, with documentation of the occurrence and characteristics of vestibular dysfunctions in this group of children using an extensive vestibular test battery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In order to achieve the objectives of the observational cross-sectional Balanced Growth study, a single-task and dual-task test protocol was created, which will be performed in three groups of school-aged children (6-12 years old): (1) a typically developing group (n=140), (2) (audio) vestibular-impaired children (n=30) and (3) children with an NDD diagnosis (n=55) (ie, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and/or developmental coordination disorder). The test protocol consists of several custom-made tests and already existing validated test batteries and includes a vestibular assessment, an extensive motor assessment, eight neurocognitive tests, a cognitive-motor interaction assessment and includes also additional screenings to control for potential confounding factors (eg, hearing status, intelligence, physical activity, etc).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The current study was approved by the ethics committee of Ghent University Hospital on 4 June 2019 with registration number B670201940165 and is registered at Clinical Trials (clinicaltrials.gov) with identifier NCT04685746. All research findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at vestibular as well as multidisciplinary international conferences and meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04685746.

Vestibular function in adults with intellectual disabilities: feasibility and outcome of a vestibular screening protocol in Special Olympics athletes

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a well-adapted vestibular screening battery to objectively examine the (peripheral) vestibular function, and to explore the characteristics of potential vestibular deficits in the adult ID population.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study design.

STUDY SAMPLE

Compared to an age- and gender-weighted control group, a heterogeneous group of forty-five adults with ID participated in the vestibular screening at the National Games of Special Olympics Belgium (2019), which consisted of a bone conduction cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (cVEMP) measurement and video Head Impulse Test (vHIT).

RESULTS

The screening battery appeared to be feasible in the majority of the participants (cVEMP: 92%; vHIT: 72%). Overall, the occurrence of abnormal cVEMP and vHIT responses was significantly higher in the ID group, with significantly lower corrected peak-to-peak cVEMP amplitudes (p < 0.001), lower vHIT gains (p < 0.001), and higher cVEMP and vHIT asymmetry ratios in the ID group (p = 0.008 and p < 0.001 resp.).

CONCLUSIONS

Vestibular assessment using the cVEMP and vHIT technique shows a promising feasibility in adults with ID. In addition, this study suggests that people with ID exhibit an increased prevalence of (peripheral) vestibular deficits relative to the general population.

2BALANCE: a cognitive-motor dual-task protocol for individuals with vestibular dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Aside from primary vestibular symptoms such as vertigo and dizziness, persons with vestibular dysfunction frequently express cognitive and motor problems. These symptoms have mainly been assessed in single-task setting, which might not represent activities of daily living accurately. Therefore, a dual-task protocol, consisting of the simultaneous performance of cognitive and motor tasks, was developed. This protocol assesses cognitive and motor performance in general, as well as cognitive-motor interference in specific.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The motor component of the 2BALANCE protocol consists of a static and dynamic postural task. These motor tasks are combined with different cognitive tasks assessing visuospatial cognition, processing speed, working memory and response inhibition. First, test-retest reliability will be assessed with an interval of 2 weeks in a group of young adults. Second, the 2BALANCE protocol will be validated in persons with bilateral vestibulopathy. Finally, the protocol will be implemented in persons with unilateral vestibular loss.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The 2BALANCE project aims to elucidate the impact of vestibular dysfunction on cognitive and motor performance in dual-task setting. This protocol represents everyday situations better than single-task protocols, as dual-tasks such as reading street signs while walking are often encountered during daily activities. Ultimately, this project could enable individualised and holistic clinical care in these patients, taking into account single as well as dual-task performance.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The current study was approved by the ethics committee of Ghent University Hospital on 5 July 2019 with registration number B670201940465. All research findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at vestibular as well as multidisciplinary international conferences and meetings.

TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04126798, pre-results phase.