1
|
Hajibandeh S, Ashar S, Parry C, Ellis-Owen R, Kumar N. The risk and predictors of gallbladder cancer in patients with gallbladder polyps: A retrospective cohort study with an insight into confounding by indication. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:2247-2253. [PMID: 37926936 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM We aimed to determine the risk and predictors of gallbladder cancer in all individuals with gallbladder polyps (GP) including those who did not have cholecystectomy. METHODS The STROCSS guideline was followed to conduct a retrospective cohort study. All individuals with GP between 2010 and 2019 were followed up to determine the risk and predictors of gallbladder cancer. The primary outcomes were gallbladder cancer and gallbladder dysplasia, and the secondary outcomes included polyp growth rate and polyp disappearance rate. Binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were conducted to evaluate the outcomes. RESULTS Analysis of 438 patients showed risk of gallbladder cancer was 0.7% in all polyps (0% in polyps < 10 mm; 5.9% in polyps ≥ 10 mm). The risk of gallbladder dysplasia or cancer was 1.1% in all polyps (0% in polyps < 10 mm; 10% in polyps ≥ 10 mm). The polyp size (P = 0.0001) was predictor of cancer; however, patient's age (P = 0.1085), number of polyps (P = 0.9983), symptomatic polyps (P = 0.3267), and change in size (P = 0.9012) were not. Size of 21 mm was cut-off for risk of cancer (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.995, P < 0.001) and 11.8 mm for risk of dysplasia or cancer (AUC: 0.986, P < 0.001). The mean polyp growth rate was 0.3 mm/year and polyp disappearance rate was 16%. CONCLUSIONS The GP size remains the only predictor of malignant changes regardless of patient's age, patient's symptoms and number of polyps. The polyp growth rate is unremarkable, and a significant proportion disappears during follow-up. We changed our follow-up protocol with reduced number of scans and early discharge policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahab Hajibandeh
- Cardiff Liver Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sana Ashar
- Cardiff Liver Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Craig Parry
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Rwth Ellis-Owen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Nagappan Kumar
- Cardiff Liver Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Torkington J, Harries R, O'Connell S, Knight L, Islam S, Bashir N, Watkins A, Fegan G, Cornish J, Rees B, Cole H, Jarvis H, Jones S, Russell I, Bosanquet D, Cleves A, Sewell B, Farr A, Zbrzyzna N, Fiera N, Ellis-Owen R, Hilton Z, Parry C, Bradbury A, Wall P, Hill J, Winter D, Cocks K, Harris D, Hilton J, Vakis S, Hanratty D, Rajagopal R, Akbar F, Ben-Sassi A, Francis N, Jones L, Williamson M, Lindsey I, West R, Smart C, Ziprin P, Agarwal T, Faulkner G, Pinkney T, Vimalachandran D, Lawes D, Faiz O, Nisar P, Smart N, Wilson T, Myers A, Lund J, Smolarek S, Acheson A, Horwood J, Ansell J, Phillips S, Davies M, Davies L, Bird S, Palmer N, Williams M, Galanopoulos G, Rao PD, Jones D, Barnett R, Tate S, Wheat J, Patel N, Rahmani S, Toynton E, Smith L, Reeves N, Kealaher E, Williams G, Sekaran C, Evans M, Beynon J, Egan R, Qasem E, Khot U, Ather S, Mummigati P, Taylor G, Williamson J, Lim J, Powell A, Nageswaran H, Williams A, Padmanabhan J, Phillips K, Ford T, Edwards J, Varney N, Hicks L, Greenway C, Chesters K, Jones H, Blake P, Brown C, Roche L, Jones D, Feeney M, Shah P, Rutter C, McGrath C, Curtis N, Pippard L, Perry J, Allison J, Ockrim J, Dalton R, Allison A, Rendell J, Howard L, Beesley K, Dennison G, Burton J, Bowen G, Duberley S, Richards L, Giles J, Katebe J, Dalton S, Wood J, Courtney E, Hompes R, Poole A, Ward S, Wilkinson L, Hardstaff L, Bogden M, Al-Rashedy M, Fensom C, Lunt N, McCurrie M, Peacock R, Malik K, Burns H, Townley B, Hill P, Sadat M, Khan U, Wignall C, Murati D, Dhanaratne M, Quaid S, Gurram S, Smith D, Harris P, Pollard J, DiBenedetto G, Chadwick J, Hull R, Bach S, Morton D, Hollier K, Hardy V, Ghods M, Tyrrell D, Ashraf S, Glasbey J, Ashraf M, Garner S, Whitehouse A, Yeung D, Mohamed SN, Wilkin R, Suggett N, Lee C, Bagul A, McNeill C, Eardley N, Mahapatra R, Gabriel C, Datt P, Mahmud S, Daniels I, McDermott F, Nodolsk M, Park L, Scott H, Trickett J, Bearn P, Trivedi P, Frost V, Gray C, Croft M, Beral D, Osborne J, Pugh R, Herdman G, George R, Howell AM, Al-Shahaby S, Narendrakumar B, Mohsen Y, Ijaz S, Nasseri M, Herrod P, Brear T, Reilly JJ, Sohal A, Otieno C, Lai W, Coleman M, Platt E, Patrick A, Pitman C, Balasubramanya S, Dickson E, Warman R, Newton C, Tani S, Simpson J, Banerjee A, Siddika A, Campion D, Humes D, Randhawa N, Saunders J, Bharathan B, Hay O. Incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery according to suture technique: Hughes Abdominal Repair Randomized Trial (HART). Br J Surg 2022; 109:943-950. [PMID: 35979802 PMCID: PMC10364691 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incisional hernias cause morbidity and may require further surgery. HART (Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial) assessed the effect of an alternative suture method on the incidence of incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS A pragmatic multicentre single-blind RCT allocated patients undergoing midline incision for colorectal cancer to either Hughes closure (double far-near-near-far sutures of 1 nylon suture at 2-cm intervals along the fascia combined with conventional mass closure) or the surgeon's standard closure. The primary outcome was the incidence of incisional hernia at 1 year assessed by clinical examination. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS Between August 2014 and February 2018, 802 patients were randomized to either Hughes closure (401) or the standard mass closure group (401). At 1 year after surgery, 672 patients (83.7 per cent) were included in the primary outcome analysis; 50 of 339 patients (14.8 per cent) in the Hughes group and 57 of 333 (17.1 per cent) in the standard closure group had incisional hernia (OR 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.55 to 1.27; P = 0.402). At 2 years, 78 patients (28.7 per cent) in the Hughes repair group and 84 (31.8 per cent) in the standard closure group had incisional hernia (OR 0.86, 0.59 to 1.25; P = 0.429). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, apart from the rate of surgical-site infection, which was higher in the Hughes group (13.2 versus 7.7 per cent; OR 1.82, 1.14 to 2.91; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION The incidence of incisional hernia after colorectal cancer surgery is high. There was no statistical difference in incidence between Hughes closure and mass closure at 1 or 2 years. REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN25616490 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
Collapse
|
4
|
Cornish J, Harries RL, Bosanquet D, Rees B, Ansell J, Frewer N, Dhruva Rao PK, Parry C, Ellis-Owen R, Phillips SM, Morris C, Horwood J, Davies ML, Davies MM, Hargest R, Davies Z, Hilton J, Harris D, Ben-Sassi A, Rajagopal R, Hanratty D, Islam S, Watkins A, Bashir N, Jones S, Russell IR, Torkington J. Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART) - Abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:454. [PMID: 27634489 PMCID: PMC5025615 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1573-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Incisional hernias are common complications of midline closure following abdominal surgery and cause significant morbidity, impaired quality of life and increased health care costs. The ‘Hughes Repair’ combines a standard mass closure with a series of horizontal and two vertical mattress sutures within a single suture. This theoretically distributes the load along the incision length as well as across it. There is evidence to suggest that this technique is as effective as mesh repair for the operative management of incisional hernias; however, no trials have compared the Hughes Repair with standard mass closure for the prevention of incisional hernia formation following a midline incision. Methods/design This is a 1:1 randomised controlled trial comparing two suture techniques for the closure of the midline abdominal wound following surgery for colorectal cancer. Full ethical approval has been gained (Wales REC 3, MREC 12/WA/0374). Eight hundred patients will be randomised from approximately 20 general surgical units within the United Kingdom. Patients undergoing open or laparoscopic (more than a 5-cm midline incision) surgery for colorectal cancer, elective or emergency, are eligible. Patients under the age of 18 years, those having mesh inserted or undergoing musculofascial flap closure of the perineal defect in abdominoperineal wound closure, and those unable to give informed consent will be excluded. Patients will be randomised intraoperatively to either the Hughes Repair or standard mass closure. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of incisional hernias at 1 year as assessed by standardised clinical examination. The secondary outcomes include quality of life patient-reported outcome measures, cost-utility analysis, incidence of complete abdominal wound dehiscence and C-POSSUM scores. The incidence of incisional hernia at 1 year, assessed by computerised tomography, will form a tertiary outcome. Discussion A feasibility phase has been completed. The results of the study will be used to inform current and future practice and potentially reduce the risk of incisional hernia formation following midline incisions. Trial registration Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN 25616490. Registered on 1 January 2012. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1573-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Cornish
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - R L Harries
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - D Bosanquet
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - B Rees
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - J Ansell
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - N Frewer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - P K Dhruva Rao
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - C Parry
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - R Ellis-Owen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - S M Phillips
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - C Morris
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - J Horwood
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - M L Davies
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - M M Davies
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - R Hargest
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - Z Davies
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK
| | - J Hilton
- Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend, UK
| | | | | | | | - D Hanratty
- Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK
| | - S Islam
- Swansea Clinical Trials Unit, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - A Watkins
- Swansea Clinical Trials Unit, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - N Bashir
- Swansea Clinical Trials Unit, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - S Jones
- Involving People, Health and Care Research Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - I R Russell
- Swansea Clinical Trials Unit, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - J Torkington
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|