1
|
Coomans EM, de Koning LA, Rikken RM, Verfaillie SCJ, Visser D, den Braber A, Tomassen J, van de Beek M, Collij LE, Lemstra AW, Windhorst AD, Barkhof F, Golla SSV, Visser PJ, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele R, van Berckel BNM, van de Giessen E. Performance of a [ 18F]Flortaucipir PET Visual Read Method Across the Alzheimer Disease Continuum and in Dementia With Lewy Bodies. Neurology 2023; 101:e1850-e1862. [PMID: 37748892 PMCID: PMC10663007 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the tau-binding radiotracer [18F]flortaucipir and an accompanying visual read method to support the diagnostic process in cognitively impaired patients assessed for Alzheimer disease (AD). Studies evaluating this visual read method are limited. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the visual read method in participants along the AD continuum and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) by determining its reliability, accordance with semiquantitative analyses, and associations with clinically relevant variables. METHODS We included participants who underwent tau-PET at Amsterdam University Medical Center. A subset underwent follow-up tau-PET. Two trained nuclear medicine physicians visually assessed all scans. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Cohen κ. To examine the concordance of visual read tau positivity with semiquantification, we defined standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) positivity using different threshold approaches. To evaluate the prognostic value of tau-PET visual read, we performed linear mixed models with longitudinal Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS We included 263 participants (mean age 68.5 years, 45.6% female), including 147 cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants, 97 amyloid-positive participants with mild cognitive impairment or AD dementia (AD), and 19 participants with DLB. The visual read inter-reader agreement was excellent (κ = 0.95, CI 0.91-0.99). None of the amyloid-negative CU participants (0/92 [0%]) and 1 amyloid-negative participant with DLB (1/12 [8.3%]) were tau-positive. Among amyloid-positive participants, 13 CU participants (13/52 [25.0%]), 85 with AD (85/97 [87.6%]), and 3 with DLB (3/7 [42.9%]) were tau-positive. Two-year follow-up visual read status was identical to baseline. Tau-PET visual read corresponded strongly to SUVr status, with up to 90.4% concordance. Visual read tau positivity was associated with a decline on the MMSE in CU participants (β = -0.52, CI -0.74 to -0.30, p < 0.001) and participants with AD (β = -0.30, CI -0.58 to -0.02, p = 0.04). DISCUSSION The excellent inter-reader agreement, strong correspondence with SUVr, and longitudinal stability indicate that the visual read method is reliable and robust, supporting clinical application. Furthermore, visual read tau positivity was associated with prospective cognitive decline, highlighting its additional prognostic potential. Future studies in unselected cohorts are needed for a better generalizability to the clinical population. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that [18F]flortaucipir visual read accurately distinguishes patients with low tau-tracer binding from those with high tau-tracer binding and is associated with amyloid positivity and cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M Coomans
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden.
| | - Lotte A de Koning
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Roos M Rikken
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Denise Visser
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Anouk den Braber
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Jori Tomassen
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Marleen van de Beek
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Afina W Lemstra
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Philip Scheltens
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| | - Elsmarieke van de Giessen
- From the Radiology & Nuclear Medicine (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Brain Imaging (E.M.C., L.A.d.K., R.M.R., S.C.J.V., D.V., L.E.C., A.D.W., F.B., S.S.V.G., B.N.M.v.B., E.v.d.G.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Medical Psychology (S.C.J.V.), Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc; Neurodegeneration (A.d.B., J.T., M.v.d.B., A.W.L., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F., R.O.), Amsterdam Neuroscience; Department of Biological Psychology (A.d.B.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing (F.B.), University College London, United Kingdom; Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands; Division of Neurogeriatrics (P.J.V.), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology & Data Science (W.M.v.d.F.), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands; and Clinical Memory Research Unit (R.O.), Lund University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tuncel H, Visser D, Timmers T, Wolters EE, Ossenkoppele R, van der Flier WM, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R, Golla SSV. Head-to-head comparison of relative cerebral blood flow derived from dynamic [ 18F]florbetapir and [ 18F]flortaucipir PET in subjects with subjective cognitive decline. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:93. [PMID: 37889456 PMCID: PMC10611685 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01041-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dynamic PET imaging studies provide accurate estimates of specific binding, but also measure the relative tracer delivery (R1), which is a proxy for relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Recently, studies suggested that R1 obtained from different tracers could be used interchangeably and is irrespective of target tissue. However, the similarities or differences of R1 obtained from different PET tracers still require validation. Therefore, the goal of the current study was to compare R1 estimates, derived from dynamic [18F]florbetapir (amyloid) and [18F]flortaucipir (tau) PET, in the same subjects with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). RESULTS Voxel-wise analysis presented a small cluster (1.6% of the whole brain) with higher R1 values for [18F]flortaucipir compared to [18F]florbetapir in the Aβ-negative group. These voxels were part of the hippocampus and the left middle occipital gyrus. In part of the thalamus, midbrain and cerebellum, voxels (2.5% of the whole brain) with higher R1 values for [18F]florbetapir were observed. In the Aβ-positive group, a cluster (0.2% of the whole brain) of higher R1 values was observed in part of the hippocampus, right parahippocampal gyrus and in the left sagittal stratum for [18F]flortaucipir compared to [18F]florbetapir. Furthermore, in part of the thalamus, left amygdala, midbrain and right parahippocampal gyrus voxels (0.4% of the whole brain) with higher R1 values for [18F]florbetapir were observed. Despite these differences, [18F]florbetapir R1 had high correspondence with [18F]flortaucipir R1 across all regions of interest (ROIs) and subjects (Aβ-:r2 = 0.79, slope = 0.85, ICC = 0.76; Aβ+: r2 = 0.87, slope = 0.93, ICC = 0.77). CONCLUSION [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]florbetapir showed similar R1 estimates in cortical regions. This finding, put together with previous studies, indicates that R1 could be considered a surrogate for relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the cortex and may be used interchangeably, but with caution, regardless of the choice of these two tracers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schoonhoven DN, Coomans EM, Millán AP, van Nifterick AM, Visser D, Ossenkoppele R, Tuncel H, van der Flier WM, Golla SSV, Scheltens P, Hillebrand A, van Berckel BNM, Stam CJ, Gouw AA. Tau protein spreads through functionally connected neurons in Alzheimer's disease: a combined MEG/PET study. Brain 2023; 146:4040-4054. [PMID: 37279597 PMCID: PMC10545627 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent studies on Alzheimer's disease (AD) suggest that tau proteins spread through the brain following neuronal connections. Several mechanisms could be involved in this process: spreading between brain regions that interact strongly (functional connectivity); through the pattern of anatomical connections (structural connectivity); or simple diffusion. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we investigated which spreading pathways influence tau protein spreading by modelling the tau propagation process using an epidemic spreading model. We compared the modelled tau depositions with 18F-flortaucipir PET binding potentials at several stages of the AD continuum. In this cross-sectional study, we analysed source-reconstructed MEG data and dynamic 100-min 18F-flortaucipir PET from 57 subjects positive for amyloid-β pathology [preclinical AD (n = 16), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (n = 16) and AD dementia (n = 25)]. Cognitively healthy subjects without amyloid-β pathology were included as controls (n = 25). Tau propagation was modelled as an epidemic process (susceptible-infected model) on MEG-based functional networks [in alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) bands], a structural or diffusion network, starting from the middle and inferior temporal lobe. The group-level network of the control group was used as input for the model to predict tau deposition in three stages of the AD continuum. To assess performance, model output was compared to the group-specific tau deposition patterns as measured with 18F-flortaucipir PET. We repeated the analysis by using networks of the preceding disease stage and/or using regions with most observed tau deposition during the preceding stage as seeds. In the preclinical AD stage, the functional networks predicted most of the modelled tau-PET binding potential, with best correlations between model and tau-PET [corrected amplitude envelope correlation (AEC-c) alpha C = 0.584; AEC-c beta C = 0.569], followed by the structural network (C = 0.451) and simple diffusion (C = 0.451). Prediction accuracy declined for the MCI and AD dementia stages, although the correlation between modelled tau and tau-PET binding remained highest for the functional networks (C = 0.384; C = 0.376). Replacing the control-network with the network from the preceding disease stage and/or alternative seeds improved prediction accuracy in MCI but not in the dementia stage. These results suggest that in addition to structural connections, functional connections play an important role in tau spread, and highlight that neuronal dynamics play a key role in promoting this pathological process. Aberrant neuronal communication patterns should be taken into account when identifying targets for future therapy. Our results also suggest that this process is more important in earlier disease stages (preclinical AD/MCI); possibly, in later stages, other processes may be influential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah N Schoonhoven
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma M Coomans
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ana P Millán
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M van Nifterick
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Hillebrand
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Systems and Network Neuroscience, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J Stam
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alida A Gouw
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferrández MC, Golla SSV, Eertink JJ, de Vries BM, Wiegers SE, Zwezerijnen GJC, Pieplenbosch S, Schilder L, Heymans MW, Zijlstra JM, Boellaard R. Sensitivity of an AI method for [ 18F]FDG PET/CT outcome prediction of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients to image reconstruction protocols. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:88. [PMID: 37758869 PMCID: PMC10533444 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01036-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), applied to baseline [18F]-FDG PET/CT maximum intensity projections (MIPs), show potential for treatment outcome prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The aim of this study is to investigate the robustness of CNN predictions to different image reconstruction protocols. Baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT scans were collected from 20 DLBCL patients. EARL1, EARL2 and high-resolution (HR) protocols were applied per scan, generating three images with different image qualities. Image-based transformation was applied by blurring EARL2 and HR images to generate EARL1 compliant images using a Gaussian filter of 5 and 7 mm, respectively. MIPs were generated for each of the reconstructions, before and after image transformation. An in-house developed CNN predicted the probability of tumor progression within 2 years for each MIP. The difference in probabilities per patient was then calculated between both EARL2 and HR with respect to EARL1 (delta probabilities or ΔP). We compared these to the probabilities obtained after aligning the data with ComBat using the difference in median and interquartile range (IQR). RESULTS CNN probabilities were found to be sensitive to different reconstruction protocols (EARL2 ΔP: median = 0.09, interquartile range (IQR) = [0.06, 0.10] and HR ΔP: median = 0.1, IQR = [0.08, 0.16]). Moreover, higher resolution images (EARL2 and HR) led to higher probability values. After image-based and ComBat transformation, an improved agreement of CNN probabilities among reconstructions was found for all patients. This agreement was slightly better after image-based transformation (transformed EARL2 ΔP: median = 0.022, IQR = [0.01, 0.02] and transformed HR ΔP: median = 0.029, IQR = [0.01, 0.03]). CONCLUSION Our CNN-based outcome predictions are affected by the applied reconstruction protocols, yet in a predictable manner. Image-based harmonization is a suitable approach to harmonize CNN predictions across image reconstruction protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Ferrández
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jakoba J Eertink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart M de Vries
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne E Wiegers
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerben J C Zwezerijnen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Pieplenbosch
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Louise Schilder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coomans EM, Tomassen J, Ossenkoppele R, Tijms BM, Lorenzini L, ten Kate M, Collij LE, Heeman F, Rikken RM, van der Landen SM, den Hollander ME, Golla SSV, Yaqub M, Windhorst AD, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, de Geus EJC, Visser PJ, van Berckel BNM, den Braber A. Genetically identical twin-pair difference models support the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Brain 2023; 146:3735-3746. [PMID: 36892415 PMCID: PMC10473566 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The amyloid cascade hypothesis has strongly impacted the Alzheimer's disease research agenda and clinical trial designs over the past decades, but precisely how amyloid-β pathology initiates the aggregation of neocortical tau remains unclear. We cannot exclude the possibility of a shared upstream process driving both amyloid-β and tau in an independent manner instead of there being a causal relationship between amyloid-β and tau. Here, we tested the premise that if a causal relationship exists, then exposure should be associated with outcome both at the individual level as well as within identical twin-pairs, who are strongly matched on genetic, demographic and shared environmental background. Specifically, we tested associations between longitudinal amyloid-β PET and cross-sectional tau PET, neurodegeneration and cognitive decline using genetically identical twin-pair difference models, which provide the unique opportunity of ruling out genetic and shared environmental effects as potential confounders in an association. We included 78 cognitively unimpaired identical twins with [18F]flutemetamol (amyloid-β)-PET, [18F]flortaucipir (tau)-PET, MRI (hippocampal volume) and cognitive data (composite memory). Associations between each modality were tested at the individual level using generalized estimating equation models, and within identical twin-pairs using within-pair difference models. Mediation analyses were performed to test for directionality in the associations as suggested by the amyloid cascade hypothesis. At the individual level, we observed moderate-to-strong associations between amyloid-β, tau, neurodegeneration and cognition. The within-pair difference models replicated results observed at the individual level with comparably strong effect sizes. Within-pair differences in amyloid-β were strongly associated with within-pair differences in tau (β = 0.68, P < 0.001), and moderately associated with within-pair differences in hippocampal volume (β = -0.37, P = 0.03) and memory functioning (β = -0.57, P < 0.001). Within-pair differences in tau were moderately associated with within-pair differences in hippocampal volume (β = -0.53, P < 0.001) and strongly associated with within-pair differences in memory functioning (β = -0.68, P < 0.001). Mediation analyses showed that of the total twin-difference effect of amyloid-β on memory functioning, the proportion mediated through pathways including tau and hippocampal volume was 69.9%, which was largely attributable to the pathway leading from amyloid-β to tau to memory functioning (proportion mediated, 51.6%). Our results indicate that associations between amyloid-β, tau, neurodegeneration and cognition are unbiased by (genetic) confounding. Furthermore, effects of amyloid-β on neurodegeneration and cognitive decline were fully mediated by tau. These novel findings in this unique sample of identical twins are compatible with the amyloid cascade hypothesis and thereby provide important new knowledge for clinical trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, 205 02 Lund, Sweden
| | - Betty M Tijms
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luigi Lorenzini
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mara ten Kate
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona Heeman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roos M Rikken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie M van der Landen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke E den Hollander
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eco J C de Geus
- Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferrández MC, Golla SSV, Eertink JJ, de Vries BM, Lugtenburg PJ, Wiegers SE, Zwezerijnen GJC, Pieplenbosch S, Kurch L, Hüttmann A, Hanoun C, Dührsen U, de Vet HCW, Zijlstra JM, Boellaard R. An artificial intelligence method using FDG PET to predict treatment outcome in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:13111. [PMID: 37573446 PMCID: PMC10423266 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40218-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) may improve response prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a CNN using maximum intensity projection (MIP) images from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) baseline scans to predict the probability of time-to-progression (TTP) within 2 years and compare it with the International Prognostic Index (IPI), i.e. a clinically used score. 296 DLBCL 18F-FDG PET/CT baseline scans collected from a prospective clinical trial (HOVON-84) were analysed. Cross-validation was performed using coronal and sagittal MIPs. An external dataset (340 DLBCL patients) was used to validate the model. Association between the probabilities, metabolic tumour volume and Dmaxbulk was assessed. Probabilities for PET scans with synthetically removed tumors were also assessed. The CNN provided a 2-year TTP prediction with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, outperforming the IPI-based model (AUC = 0.68). Furthermore, high probabilities (> 0.6) of the original MIPs were considerably decreased after removing the tumours (< 0.4, generally). These findings suggest that MIP-based CNNs are able to predict treatment outcome in DLBCL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Ferrández
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jakoba J Eertink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart M de Vries
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieternella J Lugtenburg
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne E Wiegers
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerben J C Zwezerijnen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Pieplenbosch
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lars Kurch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinic and Polyclinic for Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Hüttmann
- Department of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christine Hanoun
- Department of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Dührsen
- Department of Hematology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Henrica C W de Vet
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Methodology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Engelen MPE, Verfaillie SCJ, Dols A, Oudega ML, Boellaard R, Golla SSV, den Hollander M, Ossenkoppele R, Scheltens P, van Berckel BNM, Pijnenburg YAL, Vijverberg EGB. Altered brain metabolism in frontotemporal dementia and psychiatric disorders: involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:71. [PMID: 37493827 PMCID: PMC10371967 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01020-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioural symptoms and frontotemporal hypometabolism overlap between behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and primary psychiatric disorders (PPD), hampering diagnostic distinction. Voxel-wise comparisons of brain metabolism might identify specific frontotemporal-(hypo)metabolic regions between bvFTD and PPD. We investigated brain metabolism in bvFTD and PPD and its relationship with behavioural symptoms, social cognition, severity of depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning. RESULTS Compared to controls, bvFTD showed decreased metabolism in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) (p < 0.001), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), temporal pole, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and caudate, whereas PPD showed no hypometabolism. Compared to PPD, bvFTD showed decreased metabolism in the dACC (p < 0.001, p < 0.05FWE), insula, Broca's area, caudate, thalamus, OFC and temporal cortex (p < 0.001), whereas PPD showed decreased metabolism in the motor cortex (p < 0.001). Across bvFTD and PPD, decreased metabolism in the temporal cortex (p < 0.001, p < 0.05FWE), dACC and frontal cortex was associated with worse social cognition. Decreased metabolism in the dlPFC was associated with compulsiveness (p < 0.001). Across bvFTD, PPD and controls, decreased metabolism in the PFC and motor cortex was associated with executive dysfunctioning (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate subtle but distinct metabolic patterns in bvFTD and PPD, most strongly in the dACC. The degree of frontotemporal and cingulate hypometabolism was related to impaired social cognition, compulsiveness and executive dysfunctioning. Our findings suggest that the dACC might be an important region to differentiate between bvFTD and PPD but needs further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Paule E van Engelen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Dols
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mardien L Oudega
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Sleep & Stress Program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke den Hollander
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- EQT Life Sciences Partners, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Everard G B Vijverberg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Visser D, Verfaillie SCJ, Bosch I, Brouwer I, Tuncel H, Coomans EM, Rikken RM, Mastenbroek SE, Golla SSV, Barkhof F, van de Giessen E, van Berckel BNM, van der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele R. Tau pathology as determinant of changes in atrophy and cerebral blood flow: a multi-modal longitudinal imaging study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2409-2419. [PMID: 36976303 PMCID: PMC10250461 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06196-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tau pathology is associated with concurrent atrophy and decreased cerebral blood flow (CBF) in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but less is known about their temporal relationships. Our aim was therefore to investigate the association of concurrent and longitudinal tau PET with longitudinal changes in atrophy and relative CBF. METHODS We included 61 individuals from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (mean age 65.1 ± 7.5 years, 44% female, 57% amyloid-β positive [Aβ +], 26 cognitively impaired [CI]) who underwent dynamic [18F]flortaucipir PET and structural MRI at baseline and 25 ± 5 months follow-up. In addition, we included 86 individuals (68 CI) who only underwent baseline dynamic [18F]flortaucipir PET and MRI scans to increase power in our statistical models. We obtained [18F]flortaucipir PET binding potential (BPND) and R1 values reflecting tau load and relative CBF, respectively, and computed cortical thickness from the structural MRI scans using FreeSurfer. We assessed the regional associations between i) baseline and ii) annual change in tau PET BPND in Braak I, III/IV, and V/VI regions and cortical thickness or R1 in cortical gray matter regions (spanning the whole brain) over time using linear mixed models with random intercepts adjusted for age, sex, time between baseline and follow-up assessments, and baseline BPND in case of analyses with annual change as determinant. All analyses were performed in Aβ- cognitively normal (CN) individuals and Aβ+ (CN and CI) individuals separately. RESULTS In Aβ+ individuals, greater baseline Braak III/IV and V/VI tau PET binding was associated with faster cortical thinning in primarily frontotemporal regions. Annual changes in tau PET were not associated with cortical thinning over time in either Aβ+ or Aβ- individuals. Baseline tau PET was not associated with longitudinal changes in relative CBF, but increases in Braak III/IV tau PET over time were associated with increases in parietal relative CBF over time in Aβ + individuals. CONCLUSION We showed that higher tau load was related to accelerated cortical thinning, but not to decreases in relative CBF. Moreover, tau PET load at baseline was a stronger predictor of cortical thinning than change of tau PET signal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Bosch
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Iman Brouwer
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roos M Rikken
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie E Mastenbroek
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elsmarieke van de Giessen
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Coomans EM, Verberk IMW, Ossenkoppele R, Verfaillie SCJ, Visser D, Gouda M, Tuncel H, Wolters EE, Timmers T, Windhorst AD, Golla SSV, Scheltens P, van WM, Flier D, van Berckel BNM, Teunissen CE. A Head-to-Head Comparison Between Plasma pTau181 and Tau PET Along the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:437-443. [PMID: 36229187 PMCID: PMC10071811 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Both plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine-181 (pTau181) and tau PET show potential for detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and predicting clinical progression. In this study, we performed a head-to-head comparison between plasma pTau181 and tau PET along the AD continuum. Methods: We included participants from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort who underwent 18F-flortaucipir (tau) PET and had a plasma sample biobanked within 12 mo from tau PET. Fifty subjective cognitive decline (SCD) participants (31 Aβ-negative and 19 Aβ-positive) and 60 Aβ-positive participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to AD were included. A subset had 2-y longitudinal plasma pTau181 and tau PET available (n = 40). Longitudinal neuropsychological test data covering 3.2 ± 2.7 y from both before and after tau PET were available. Plasma pTau181 and tau PET were compared in their accuracies in discriminating between cognitive stage (MCI/AD vs. SCD) and preclinical Aβ status (SCD Aβ-positive vs. SCD Aβ-negative), their associations with cross-sectional and longitudinal neuropsychological test performance, and their longitudinal changes over time. Results: When discriminating between preclinical Aβ status, the area under the curve (AUC) for plasma pTau181 (0.83) and tau PET (entorhinal, 0.87; temporal, 0.85; neocortical, 0.67) were equally high (all DeLong P > 0.05), but tau PET outperformed plasma pTau181 in discriminating MCI/AD from SCD (AUC for plasma pTau181: 0.74; AUCs for tau PET: entorhinal, 0.89; temporal, 0.92; neocortical, 0.89) (all P < 0.01). Overall, tau PET showed stronger associations with cognitive decline and was associated with a wider variety of cognitive tests than plasma pTau181 (plasma pTau181, -0.02 > β < -0.12; tau PET, -0.01 > β < -0.22). Both plasma pTau181 and tau PET increased more steeply over time in MCI/AD than in SCD (P < 0.05), but only tau PET annual changes were associated with cognitive decline. Conclusion: Our results suggest that plasma pTau181 and tau PET perform equally well in identifying Aβ pathology but that tau PET better monitors disease stage and clinical progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Inge M W Verberk
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Laboratory, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mariam Gouda
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Laboratory, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neurochemistry Laboratory, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huiskamp M, Yaqub M, van Lingen MR, Pouwels PJW, de Ruiter LRJ, Killestein J, Schwarte LA, Golla SSV, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R, Geurts JJG, Hulst HE. Cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis: what is the role of the gamma-aminobutyric acid system? Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad140. [PMID: 37180993 PMCID: PMC10174207 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognitive impairment occurs in 40-65% of persons with multiple sclerosis and may be related to alterations in glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine how glutamatergic and GABAergic changes relate to cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis in vivo. Sixty persons with multiple sclerosis (mean age 45.5 ± 9.6 years, 48 females, 51 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis) and 22 age-matched healthy controls (45.6 ± 22.0 years, 17 females) underwent neuropsychological testing and MRI. Persons with multiple sclerosis were classified as cognitively impaired when scoring at least 1.5 standard deviations below normative scores on ≥30% of tests. Glutamate and GABA concentrations were determined in the right hippocampus and bilateral thalamus using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. GABA-receptor density was assessed using quantitative [11C]flumazenil positron emission tomography in a subset of participants. Positron emission tomography outcome measures were the influx rate constant (a measure predominantly reflecting perfusion) and volume of distribution, which is a measure of GABA-receptor density. Twenty persons with multiple sclerosis (33%) fulfilled the criteria for cognitive impairment. No differences were observed in glutamate or GABA concentrations between persons with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls, or between cognitively preserved, impaired and healthy control groups. Twenty-two persons with multiple sclerosis (12 cognitively preserved and 10 impaired) and 10 healthy controls successfully underwent [11C]flumazenil positron emission tomography. Persons with multiple sclerosis showed a lower influx rate constant in the thalamus, indicating lower perfusion. For the volume of distribution, persons with multiple sclerosis showed higher values than controls in deep grey matter, reflecting increased GABA-receptor density. When comparing cognitively impaired and preserved patients to controls, the preserved group showed a significantly higher volume of distribution in cortical and deep grey matter and hippocampus. Positive correlations were observed between both positron emission tomography measures and information processing speed in the multiple sclerosis group only. Whereas concentrations of glutamate and GABA did not differ between multiple sclerosis and control nor between cognitively impaired, preserved and control groups, increased GABA-receptor density was observed in preserved persons with multiple sclerosis that was not seen in cognitively impaired patients. In addition, GABA-receptor density correlated to cognition, in particular with information processing speed. This could indicate that GABA-receptor density is upregulated in the cognitively preserved phase of multiple sclerosis as a means to regulate neurotransmission and potentially preserve cognitive functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijn Huiskamp
- Correspondence to: M. Huiskamp Department of Anatomy & Neurosciences Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail:
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Marike R van Lingen
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Petra J W Pouwels
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Lodewijk R J de Ruiter
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Joep Killestein
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Lothar A Schwarte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and nuclear medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J G Geurts
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke E Hulst
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferrández MC, Eertink JJ, Golla SSV, Wiegers SE, Zwezerijnen GJC, Pieplenbosch S, Zijlstra JM, Boellaard R. Combatting the effect of image reconstruction settings on lymphoma [ 18F]FDG PET metabolic tumor volume assessment using various segmentation methods. EJNMMI Res 2022; 12:44. [PMID: 35904645 PMCID: PMC9338209 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00916-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background [18F]FDG PET-based metabolic tumor volume (MTV) is a promising prognostic marker for lymphoma patients. The aim of this study is to assess the sensitivity of several MTV segmentation methods to variations in image reconstruction methods and the ability of ComBat to improve MTV reproducibility. Methods Fifty-six lesions were segmented from baseline [18F]FDG PET scans of 19 lymphoma patients. For each scan, EARL1 and EARL2 standards and locally clinically preferred reconstruction protocols were applied. Lesions were delineated using 9 semiautomatic segmentation methods: fixed threshold based on standardized uptake value (SUV), (SUV = 4, SUV = 2.5), relative threshold (41% of SUVmax [41M], 50% of SUVpeak [A50P]), majority vote-based methods that select voxels detected by at least 2 (MV2) and 3 (MV3) out of the latter 4 methods, Nestle thresholding, and methods that identify the optimal method based on SUVmax (L2A, L2B). MTVs from EARL2 and locally clinically preferred reconstructions were compared to those from EARL1. Finally, different versions of ComBat were explored to harmonize the data.
Results MTVs from the SUV4.0 method were least sensitive to the use of different reconstructions (MTV ratio: median = 1.01, interquartile range = [0.96–1.10]). After ComBat harmonization, an improved agreement of MTVs among different reconstructions was found for most segmentation methods. The regular implementation of ComBat (‘Regular ComBat’) using non-transformed distributions resulted in less accurate and precise MTV alignments than a version using log-transformed datasets (‘Log-transformed ComBat’). Conclusion MTV depends on both segmentation method and reconstruction methods. ComBat reduces reconstruction dependent MTV variability, especially when log-transformation is used to account for the non-normal distribution of MTVs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-022-00916-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Ferrández
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jakoba J Eertink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne E Wiegers
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerben J C Zwezerijnen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Pieplenbosch
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Vries BM, Golla SSV, Zwezerijnen GJC, Hoekstra OS, Jauw YWS, Huisman MC, van Dongen GAMS, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt WC, Zijlstra-Baalbergen JJM, Mesotten L, Boellaard R, Yaqub M. 3D Convolutional Neural Network-Based Denoising of Low-Count Whole-Body 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose and 89Zr-Rituximab PET Scans. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12030596. [PMID: 35328149 PMCID: PMC8946936 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Acquisition time and injected activity of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET should ideally be reduced. However, this decreases the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which impairs the diagnostic value of these PET scans. In addition, 89Zr-antibody PET is known to have a low SNR. To improve the diagnostic value of these scans, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) denoising method is proposed. The aim of this study was therefore to develop CNNs to increase SNR for low-count 18F-FDG and 89Zr-antibody PET. Super-low-count, low-count and full-count 18F-FDG PET scans from 60 primary lung cancer patients and full-count 89Zr-rituximab PET scans from five patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma were acquired. CNNs were built to capture the features and to denoise the PET scans. Additionally, Gaussian smoothing (GS) and Bilateral filtering (BF) were evaluated. The performance of the denoising approaches was assessed based on the tumour recovery coefficient (TRC), coefficient of variance (COV; level of noise), and a qualitative assessment by two nuclear medicine physicians. The CNNs had a higher TRC and comparable or lower COV to GS and BF and was also the preferred method of the two observers for both 18F-FDG and 89Zr-rituximab PET. The CNNs improved the SNR of low-count 18F-FDG and 89Zr-rituximab PET, with almost similar or better clinical performance than the full-count PET, respectively. Additionally, the CNNs showed better performance than GS and BF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart M. de Vries
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-643628806
| | - Sandeep S. V. Golla
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
| | - Gerben J. C. Zwezerijnen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
| | - Otto S. Hoekstra
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
| | - Yvonne W. S. Jauw
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc C. Huisman
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
| | - Guus A. M. S. van Dongen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
| | | | - Josée J. M. Zijlstra-Baalbergen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbet Mesotten
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building D, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, B-3600 Genk, Belgium
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (S.S.V.G.); (G.J.C.Z.); (O.S.H.); (Y.W.S.J.); (M.C.H.); (G.A.M.S.v.D.); (J.J.M.Z.-B.); (R.B.); (M.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tuncel H, Boellaard R, Coomans EM, Hollander-Meeuwsen MD, de Vries EFJ, Glaudemans AWJM, Feltes PK, García DV, Verfaillie SCJ, Wolters EE, Sweeney SP, Ryan JM, Ivarsson M, Lynch BA, Schober P, Scheltens P, Schuit RC, Windhorst AD, De Deyn PP, van Berckel BNM, Golla SSV. Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [11C]UCB-J PET. EJNMMI Res 2022; 12:3. [PMID: 35072802 PMCID: PMC8786991 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00874-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
[11C]UCB-J is a PET radioligand that binds to the presynaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. Therefore, [11C]UCB-J PET may serve as an in vivo marker of synaptic integrity. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the quantitative accuracy and the 28-day test–retest repeatability (TRT) of various parametric quantitative methods for dynamic [11C]UCB-J studies in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC). Eight HCs and seven AD patients underwent two 60-min dynamic [11C]UCB-J PET scans with arterial sampling over a 28-day interval. Several plasma-input based and reference-region based parametric methods were used to generate parametric images using metabolite corrected plasma activity as input function or white matter semi-ovale as reference region. Different parametric outcomes were compared regionally with corresponding non-linear regression (NLR) estimates. Furthermore, the 28-day TRT was assessed for all parametric methods. Spectral analysis (SA) and Logan graphical analysis showed high correlations with NLR estimates. Receptor parametric mapping (RPM) and simplified reference tissue model 2 (SRTM2) BPND, and reference Logan (RLogan) distribution volume ratio (DVR) regional estimates correlated well with plasma-input derived DVR and SRTM BPND. Among the multilinear reference tissue model (MRTM) methods, MRTM1 had the best correspondence with DVR and SRTM BPND. Among the parametric methods evaluated, spectral analysis (SA) and SRTM2 were the best plasma-input and reference tissue methods, respectively, to obtain quantitatively accurate and repeatable parametric images for dynamic [11C]UCB-J PET.
Collapse
|
14
|
Coomans EM, Tomassen J, Ossenkoppele R, Golla SSV, den Hollander M, Collij LE, Weltings E, van der Landen S, Wolters EE, Windhorst AD, Barkhof F, de Geus EJ, Scheltens P, Visser PJ, van Berckel BNM, den Braber A. Genetically identical twins show comparable tau PET load and spatial distribution. Brain 2022; 145:3571-3581. [PMID: 35022652 PMCID: PMC9586544 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Tau accumulation starts during the preclinical phase of Alzheimer’s disease and is closely associated with cognitive decline. For preventive purposes, it is important to identify factors associated with tau accumulation and spread. Studying genetically identical twin-pairs may give insight into genetic and environmental contributions to tau pathology, as similarities in identical twin-pairs largely result from genetic factors, while differences in identical twin-pairs can largely be attributed to non-shared, environmental factors. This study aimed to examine similarities and dissimilarities in a cohort of genetically identical older twin-pairs in (i) tau load; and (ii) spatial distribution of tau, measured with 18F-flortaucipir PET. We selected 78 genetically identical twins (39 pairs; average age 73 ± 6 years), enriched for amyloid-β pathology and APOE ε4 carriership, who underwent dynamic 18F-flortaucipir PET. We extracted binding potentials (BPND) in entorhinal, temporal, widespread neocortical and global regions, and examined within-pair similarities in BPND using age and sex corrected intra-class correlations. Furthermore, we tested whether twin-pairs showed a more similar spatial 18F-flortaucipir distribution compared to non-twin pairs, and whether the participant’s co-twin could be identified solely based on the spatial 18F-flortaucipir distribution. Last, we explored whether environmental (e.g. physical activity, obesity) factors could explain observed differences in twins of a pair in 18F-flortaucipir BPND. On visual inspection, Alzheimer’s disease-like 18F-flortaucipir PET patterns were observed, and although we mainly identified similarities in twin-pairs, some pairs showed strong dissimilarities. 18F-flortaucipir BPND was correlated in twins in the entorhinal (r = 0.40; P = 0.01), neocortical (r = 0.59; P < 0.01) and global (r = 0.56; P < 0.01) regions, but not in the temporal region (r = 0.20; P = 0.10). The 18F-flortaucipir distribution pattern was significantly more similar between twins of the same pair [mean r = 0.27; standard deviation (SD) = 0.09] than between non-twin pairings of participants (mean r = 0.01; SD = 0.10) (P < 0.01), also after correcting for proxies of off-target binding. Based on the spatial 18F-flortaucipir distribution, we could identify with an accuracy of 86% which twins belonged to the same pair. Finally, within-pair differences in 18F-flortaucipir BPND were associated with within-pair differences in depressive symptoms (0.37 < β < 0.56), physical activity (−0.41 < β < −0.42) and social activity (−0.32 < β < −0.36) (all P < 0.05). Overall, identical twin-pairs were comparable in tau load and spatial distribution, highlighting the important role of genetic factors in the accumulation and spreading of tau pathology. Considering also the presence of dissimilarities in tau pathology in identical twin-pairs, our results additionally support a role for (potentially modifiable) environmental factors in the onset of Alzheimer’s disease pathological processes, which may be of interest for future prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M. Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jori Tomassen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sandeep S. V. Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke den Hollander
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lyduine E. Collij
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Weltings
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie van der Landen
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E. Wolters
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D. Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Eco J.C. de Geus
- Department of Biological Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sweden
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biological Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tuncel H, Visser D, Yaqub M, Timmers T, Wolters EE, Ossenkoppele R, van der Flier WM, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R, Golla SSV. Effect of Shortening the Scan Duration on Quantitative Accuracy of [ 18F]Flortaucipir Studies. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:604-613. [PMID: 33496930 PMCID: PMC8277654 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01581-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) protocols allow for accurate quantification of [18F]flortaucipir-specific binding. However, dynamic acquisitions can be challenging given the long required scan duration of 130 min. The current study assessed the effect of shorter scan protocols for [18F]flortaucipir on its quantitative accuracy. PROCEDURES Two study cohorts with Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC) were included. All subjects underwent a 130-min dynamic [18F]flortaucipir PET scan consisting of two parts (0-60/80-130 min) post-injection. Arterial sampling was acquired during scanning of the first cohort only. For the second cohort, a second PET scan was acquired within 1-4 weeks of the first PET scan to assess test-retest repeatability (TRT). Three alternative time intervals were explored for the second part of the scan: 80-120, 80-110 and 80-100 min. Furthermore, the first part of the scan was also varied: 0-50, 0-40 and 0-30 min time intervals were assessed. The gap in the reference TACs was interpolated using four different interpolation methods: population-based input function 2T4k_VB (POP-IP_2T4k_VB), cubic, linear and exponential. Regional binding potential (BPND) and relative tracer delivery (R1) values estimated using simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) and/or receptor parametric mapping (RPM). The different scan protocols were compared to the respective values estimated using the original scan acquisition. In addition, TRT of the RPM BPND and R1 values estimated using the optimal shortest scan duration was also assessed. RESULTS RPM BPND and R1 obtained using 0-30/80-100 min scan and POP-IP_2T4k_VB reference region interpolation had an excellent correlation with the respective parametric values estimated using the original scan duration (r2 > 0.95). The TRT of RPM BPND and R1 using the shortest scan duration was - 1 ± 5 % and - 1 ± 6 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that [18F]flortaucipir PET scan can be acquired with sufficient quantitative accuracy using only 50 min of dual-time-window scanning time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Singleton E, Hansson O, Pijnenburg YAL, La Joie R, Mantyh WG, Tideman P, Stomrud E, Leuzy A, Johansson M, Strandberg O, Smith R, Berendrecht E, Miller BL, Iaccarino L, Edwards L, Strom A, Wolters EE, Coomans E, Visser D, Golla SSV, Tuncel H, Bouwman F, Van Swieten JC, Papma JM, van Berckel B, Scheltens P, Dijkstra AA, Rabinovici GD, Ossenkoppele R. Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021; 92:jnnp-2020-325497. [PMID: 33850001 PMCID: PMC8292599 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The clinical phenotype of the rare behavioural variant of Alzheimer's disease (bvAD) is insufficiently understood. Given the strong clinico-anatomical correlations of tau pathology in AD, we investigated the distribution of tau deposits in bvAD, in-vivo and ex-vivo, using positron emission tomography (PET) and postmortem examination. METHODS For the tau PET study, seven amyloid-β positive bvAD patients underwent [18F]flortaucipir or [18F]RO948 PET. We converted tau PET uptake values into standardised (W-)scores, adjusting for age, sex and mini mental state examination in a 'typical' memory-predominant AD (n=205) group. W-scores were computed within entorhinal, temporoparietal, medial and lateral prefrontal, insular and whole-brain regions-of-interest, frontal-to-entorhinal and frontal-to-parietal ratios and within intrinsic functional connectivity network templates. For the postmortem study, the percentage of AT8 (tau)-positive area in hippocampus CA1, temporal, parietal, frontal and insular cortices were compared between autopsy-confirmed patients with bvAD (n=8) and typical AD (tAD;n=7). RESULTS Individual regional W-scores ≥1.96 (corresponding to p<0.05) were observed in three cases, that is, case #5: medial prefrontal cortex (W=2.13) and anterior default mode network (W=3.79), case #2: lateral prefrontal cortex (W=2.79) and salience network (W=2.77), and case #7: frontal-to-entorhinal ratio (W=2.04). The remaining four cases fell within the normal distributions of the tAD group. Postmortem AT8 staining indicated no group-level regional differences in phosphorylated tau levels between bvAD and tAD (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both in-vivo and ex-vivo, patients with bvAD showed heterogeneous distributions of tau pathology. Since key regions involved in behavioural regulation were not consistently disproportionally affected by tau pathology, other factors are more likely driving the clinical phenotype in bvAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Singleton
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renaud La Joie
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - William G Mantyh
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Pontus Tideman
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - Antoine Leuzy
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maurits Johansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Olof Strandberg
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ruben Smith
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Evi Berendrecht
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bruce L Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Leonardo Iaccarino
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- In Vivo Human Molecular and Structural Neuroimaging Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Lauren Edwards
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Amelia Strom
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emma Coomans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Bouwman
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Janne M Papma
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anke A Dijkstra
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Coomans EM, Schoonhoven DN, Tuncel H, Verfaillie SCJ, Wolters EE, Boellaard R, Ossenkoppele R, den Braber A, Scheper W, Schober P, Sweeney SP, Ryan JM, Schuit RC, Windhorst AD, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Golla SSV, Hillebrand A, Gouw AA, van Berckel BNM. In vivo tau pathology is associated with synaptic loss and altered synaptic function. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021; 13:35. [PMID: 33546722 PMCID: PMC7866464 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-021-00772-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The mechanism of synaptic loss in Alzheimer's disease is poorly understood and may be associated with tau pathology. In this combined positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we aimed to investigate spatial associations between regional tau pathology ([18F]flortaucipir PET), synaptic density (synaptic vesicle 2A [11C]UCB-J PET) and synaptic function (MEG) in Alzheimer's disease. METHODS Seven amyloid-positive Alzheimer's disease subjects from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort underwent dynamic 130-min [18F]flortaucipir PET, dynamic 60-min [11C]UCB-J PET with arterial sampling and 2 × 5-min resting-state MEG measurement. [18F]flortaucipir- and [11C]UCB-J-specific binding (binding potential, BPND) and MEG spectral measures (relative delta, theta and alpha power; broadband power; and peak frequency) were assessed in cortical brain regions of interest. Associations between regional [18F]flortaucipir BPND, [11C]UCB-J BPND and MEG spectral measures were assessed using Spearman correlations and generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS Across subjects, higher regional [18F]flortaucipir uptake was associated with lower [11C]UCB-J uptake. Within subjects, the association between [11C]UCB-J and [18F]flortaucipir depended on within-subject neocortical tau load; negative associations were observed when neocortical tau load was high, gradually changing into opposite patterns with decreasing neocortical tau burden. Both higher [18F]flortaucipir and lower [11C]UCB-J uptake were associated with altered synaptic function, indicative of slowing of oscillatory activity, most pronounced in the occipital lobe. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that in Alzheimer's disease, tau pathology is closely associated with reduced synaptic density and synaptic dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Deborah N Schoonhoven
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anouk den Braber
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiep Scheper
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Department of Functional Genomics, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Schober
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Robert C Schuit
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UCL Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Hillebrand
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alida A Gouw
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Verwer EE, Golla SSV, Kaalep A, Lubberink M, van Velden FHP, Bettinardi V, Yaqub M, Sera T, Rijnsdorp S, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R. Harmonisation of PET/CT contrast recovery performance for brain studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2856-2870. [PMID: 33517517 PMCID: PMC8263427 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05201-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In order to achieve comparability of image quality, harmonisation of PET system performance is imperative. In this study, prototype harmonisation criteria for PET brain studies were developed. METHODS Twelve clinical PET/CT systems (4 GE, 4 Philips, 4 Siemens, including SiPM-based "digital" systems) were used to acquire 30-min PET scans of a Hoffman 3D Brain phantom filled with ~ 33 kBq·mL-1 [18F]FDG. Scan data were reconstructed using various reconstruction settings. The images were rigidly coregistered to a template (voxel size 1.17 × 1.17 × 2.00 mm3) onto which several volumes of interest (VOIs) were defined. Recovery coefficients (RC) and grey matter to white matter ratios (GMWMr) were derived for eroded (denoted in the text by subscript e) and non-eroded grey (GM) and white (WM) matter VOIs as well as a mid-phantom cold spot (VOIcold) and VOIs from the Hammers atlas. In addition, left-right hemisphere differences and voxel-by-voxel differences compared to a reference image were assessed. RESULTS Systematic differences were observed for reconstructions with and without point-spread-function modelling (PSFON and PSFOFF, respectively). Normalising to image-derived activity, upper and lower limits ensuring image comparability were as follows: for PSFON, RCGMe = [0.97-1.01] and GMWMre = [3.51-3.91] for eroded VOI and RCGM = [0.78-0.83] and GMWMr = [1.77-2.06] for non-eroded VOI, and for PSFOFF, RCGMe = [0.92-0.99] and GMWMre = [3.14-3.68] for eroded VOI and RCGM = [0.75-0.81] and GMWMr = [1.72-1.95] for non-eroded VOI. CONCLUSIONS To achieve inter-scanner comparability, we propose selecting reconstruction settings based on RCGMe and GMWMre as specified in "Results". These proposed standards should be tested prospectively to validate and/or refine the harmonisation criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E E Verwer
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Kaalep
- Department of Medical Technology, North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia.,EANM Research Limited (EARL), Vienna, Austria
| | - M Lubberink
- Department of Surgical Sciences / Nuclear Medicine & PET, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - F H P van Velden
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V Bettinardi
- IRCCS Scientific Institute San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M Yaqub
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Sera
- EANM Research Limited (EARL), Vienna, Austria.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - S Rijnsdorp
- Department of Medical Physics, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
de Vries BM, Timmers T, Wolters EE, Ossenkoppele R, Verfaillie SCJ, Schuit RC, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Windhorst AD, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R, Golla SSV. Non-invasive Standardised Uptake Value for Verification of the Use of Previously Validated Reference Region for [ 18F]Flortaucipir and [ 18F]Florbetapir Brain PET Studies. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:550-559. [PMID: 33443720 PMCID: PMC8277631 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) is commonly applied for the quantification of brain positron emission tomography (PET) studies, particularly because it avoids arterial cannulation. SRTM requires a validated reference region which is obtained by baseline-blocking or displacement studies. Once a reference region is validated, the use should be verified for each new subject. This verification normally requires volume of distribution (VT) of a reference region. However, performing dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not always possible, specifically in elderly subjects and in advanced disease stages. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of non-invasive standardised uptake value (SUV) approaches, in comparison to VT, as a verification of the previously validated grey matter cerebellum reference region for [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]florbetapir PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and controls. Procedures Dynamic 130-min [18F]flortaucipir PET scans obtained from nineteen subjects (10 AD patients) and 90-min [18F]florbetapir dynamic scans obtained from fourteen subjects (8 AD patients) were included. Regional VT’s were estimated for both tracers and were considered the standard verification of the previously validated reference region. Non-invasive SUVs corrected for body weight (SUVBW), lean body mass (SUL), and body surface area (SUVBSA) were obtained by using later time intervals of the dynamic scans. Simulations were also performed to assess the effect of flow and specific binding (BPND) on the SUVs. Results A low SUV corresponded well with a low VT for both [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]florbetapir. Simulation confirmed that SUVs were only slightly affected by flow changes and that increases in SUV were predominantly determined by the presence of specific binding. Conclusions In situations where dynamic scanning and arterial sampling is not possible, a low SUV(80–100 min) for [18F]flortaucipir and a low SUV(50–70 min) for [18F]florbetapir may be used as indication for absence of specific binding in the grey matter cerebellum reference region. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11307-020-01572-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart M de Vries
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Schuit
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schoonhoven DN, Coomans EM, van Nifterick AM, Ossenkoppele R, Scheltens P, Stam CJ, Golla SSV, Arjan H, Van Berckel BNM, Gouw AA. Increased
18
F‐flortaucipir load correlates with changes in MEG functional connectivity and network topology, as well as oscillatory slowing. Alzheimers Dement 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/alz.045911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah N. Schoonhoven
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Emma M. Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Anne M. van Nifterick
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | | | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J. Stam
- Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S. V. Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Hillebrand Arjan
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Bart N. M. Van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| | - Alida A. Gouw
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and MEG Center Department of Neurology Amsterdam Neuroscience Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wolters EE, van de Beek M, Ossenkoppele R, Golla SSV, Verfaillie SCJ, Coomans EM, Timmers T, Visser D, Tuncel H, Barkhof F, Boellaard R, Windhorst AD, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Lemstra AW, van Berckel BNM. Tau PET and relative cerebral blood flow in dementia with Lewy bodies: A PET study. Neuroimage Clin 2020; 28:102504. [PMID: 33395993 PMCID: PMC7714680 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Alpha-synuclein often co-occurs with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology in Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB). From a dynamic [18F]flortaucipir PET scan we derived measures of both tau binding and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF). We tested whether regional tau binding or rCBF differed between DLB patients and AD patients and controls and examined their association with clinical characteristics of DLB. METHODS Eighteen patients with probable DLB, 65 AD patients and 50 controls underwent a dynamic 130-minute [18F]flortaucipir PET scan. DLB patients with positive biomarkers for AD based on cerebrospinal fluid or amyloid PET were considered as DLB with AD pathology (DLB-AD+). Receptor parametric mapping (cerebellar gray matter reference region) was used to extract regional binding potential (BPND) and R1, reflecting (AD-specific) tau pathology and rCBF, respectively. First, we performed regional comparisons of [18F]flortaucipir BPND and R1 between diagnostic groups. In DLB patients only, we performed regression analyses between regional [18F]flortaucipir BPND, R1 and performance on ten neuropsychological tests. RESULTS Regional [18F]flortaucipir BPND in DLB was comparable with tau binding in controls (p > 0.05). Subtle higher tau binding was observed in DLB-AD+ compared to DLB-AD- in the medial temporal and parietal lobe (both p < 0.05). Occipital and lateral parietal R1 was lower in DLB compared to AD and controls (all p < 0.01). Lower frontal R1 was associated with impaired performance on digit span forward (standardized beta, stβ = 0.72) and category fluency (stβ = 0.69) tests. Lower parietal R1 was related to lower delayed (stβ = 0.50) and immediate (stβ = 0.48) recall, VOSP number location (stβ = 0.70) and fragmented letters (stβ = 0.59) scores. Lower occipital R1 was associated to worse performance on VOSP fragmented letters (stβ = 0.61), all p < 0.05. CONCLUSION The amount of tau binding in DLB was minimal and did not differ from controls. However, there were DLB-specific occipital and lateral parietal relative cerebral blood flow reductions compared to both controls and AD patients. Regional rCBF, but not tau binding, was related to cognitive impairment. This indicates that assessment of rCBF may give more insight into disease mechanisms in DLB than tau PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E E Wolters
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M van de Beek
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - S S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M Coomans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Timmers
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Visser
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Tuncel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Barkhof
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - R Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ph Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A W Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Vries BM, Golla SSV, Ebenau J, Verfaillie SCJ, Timmers T, Heeman F, Cysouw MCF, van Berckel BNM, van der Flier WM, Yaqub M, Boellaard R. Classification of negative and positive 18F-florbetapir brain PET studies in subjective cognitive decline patients using a convolutional neural network. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:721-728. [PMID: 32875431 PMCID: PMC8036183 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05006-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Visual reading of 18F-florbetapir positron emission tomography (PET) scans is used in the diagnostic process of patients with cognitive disorders for assessment of amyloid-ß (Aß) depositions. However, this can be time-consuming, and difficult in case of borderline amyloid pathology. Computer-aided pattern recognition can be helpful in this process but needs to be validated. The aim of this work was to develop, train, validate and test a convolutional neural network (CNN) for discriminating between Aß negative and positive 18F-florbetapir PET scans in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Methods 18F-florbetapir PET images were acquired and visually assessed. The SCD cohort consisted of 133 patients from the SCIENCe cohort and 22 patients from the ADNI database. From the SCIENCe cohort, standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) images were computed. From the ADNI database, SUVR images were extracted. 2D CNNs (axial, coronal and sagittal) were built to capture features of the scans. The SCIENCe scans were randomly divided into training and validation set (5-fold cross-validation), and the ADNI scans were used as test set. Performance was evaluated based on average accuracy, sensitivity and specificity from the cross-validation. Next, the best performing CNN was evaluated on the test set. Results The sagittal 2D-CNN classified the SCIENCe scans with the highest average accuracy of 99% ± 2 (SD), sensitivity of 97% ± 7 and specificity of 100%. The ADNI scans were classified with a 95% accuracy, 100% sensitivity and 92.3% specificity. Conclusion The 2D-CNN algorithm can classify Aß negative and positive 18F-florbetapir PET scans with high performance in SCD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Marius de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jarith Ebenau
- Alzheimer Center and department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Alzheimer Center and department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Alzheimer Center and department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona Heeman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs C F Cysouw
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center and department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center and department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Collij LE, Heeman F, Salvadó G, Ingala S, Altomare D, de Wilde A, Konijnenberg E, van Buchem M, Yaqub M, Markiewicz P, Golla SSV, Wottschel V, Wink AM, Visser PJ, Teunissen CE, Lammertsma AA, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Boellaard R, van Berckel BNM, Molinuevo JL, Gispert JD, Schmidt ME, Barkhof F, Lopes Alves I. Multitracer model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET imaging. Neurology 2020; 95:e1538-e1553. [PMID: 32675080 PMCID: PMC7713745 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and evaluate a model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET with high generalizability. METHODS Three thousand twenty-seven individuals (1,763 cognitively unimpaired [CU], 658 impaired, 467 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, 111 with non-AD dementia, and 28 with missing diagnosis) from 6 cohorts (European Medical Information Framework for AD, Alzheimer's and Family, Alzheimer's Biomarkers in Daily Practice, Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, Open Access Series of Imaging Studies [OASIS]-3, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [ADNI]) who underwent amyloid PET were retrospectively included; 1,049 individuals had follow-up scans. With application of dataset-specific cutoffs to global standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) values from 27 regions, single-tracer and pooled multitracer regional rankings were constructed from the frequency of abnormality across 400 CU individuals (100 per tracer). The pooled multitracer ranking was used to create a staging model consisting of 4 clusters of regions because it displayed a high and consistent correlation with each single-tracer ranking. Relationships between amyloid stage, clinical variables, and longitudinal cognitive decline were investigated. RESULTS SUVr abnormality was most frequently observed in cingulate, followed by orbitofrontal, precuneal, and insular cortices and then the associative, temporal, and occipital regions. Abnormal amyloid levels based on binary global SUVr classification were observed in 1.0%, 5.5%, 17.9%, 90.0%, and 100.0% of individuals in stage 0 to 4, respectively. Baseline stage predicted decline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (ADNI: n = 867, F = 67.37, p < 0.001; OASIS: n = 475, F = 9.12, p < 0.001) and faster progression toward an MMSE score ≤25 (ADNI: n = 787, hazard ratio [HR]stage1 2.00, HRstage2 3.53, HRstage3 4.55, HRstage4 9.91, p < 0.001; OASIS: n = 469, HRstage4 4.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The pooled multitracer staging model successfully classified the level of amyloid burden in >3,000 individuals across cohorts and radiotracers and detects preglobal amyloid burden and distinct risk profiles of cognitive decline within globally amyloid-positive individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyduine E Collij
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Fiona Heeman
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Silvia Ingala
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Daniele Altomare
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Arno de Wilde
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Elles Konijnenberg
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Marieke van Buchem
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Pawel Markiewicz
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Viktor Wottschel
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Alle Meije Wink
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Philip Scheltens
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Mark E Schmidt
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- From Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (L.E.C., F.H., S.I., M.Y., S.S.V.G., V.W., A.M.W., A.A.L., R.B., B.N.M.v.B., F.B., I.L.A.), Neurochemistry Laboratory (C.E.T.), Alzheimer Center (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), and Department of Neurology (D.A., A.d.W., E.K., M.v.B., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands; Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (J.D.G.); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (J.L.M.), Madrid; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) (G.S., J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (J.L.M., J.D.G.), Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (D.A.), University of Geneva; Memory Clinic (D.A.), University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Centre for Medical Image Computing (P.M., F.B.), Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; and Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (M.E.S.), Beerse, Belgium.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wolters EE, Ossenkoppele R, Verfaillie SCJ, Coomans EM, Timmers T, Visser D, Tuncel H, Golla SSV, Windhorst AD, Boellaard R, van der Flier WM, Teunissen CE, Scheltens P, van Berckel BNM. Regional [ 18F]flortaucipir PET is more closely associated with disease severity than CSF p-tau in Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:2866-2878. [PMID: 32291510 PMCID: PMC7567681 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04758-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In vivo Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarkers for tau pathology are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylated tau (p-tau) and [18F]flortaucipir positron emission tomography (PET). Our aim was to assess associations between CSF p-tau with [18F]flortaucipir PET and the associations of both tau biomarkers with cognition and atrophy. Methods We included 78 amyloid positive cognitively impaired patients (clinical diagnoses mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 8) and AD dementia (n = 45) and 25 cognitively normal subjects with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) (40% amyloid-positive)). Dynamic 130 min [18F]flortaucipir PET scans were acquired to generate binding potential (BPND) images using receptor parametric mapping and standardized uptake values ratios of 80–100 min (SUVr80-100min) post injection. We obtained regional BPND and SUVr from entorhinal, limbic, and neocortical regions-of-interest (ROIs), closely aligning to the neuropathological tau staging schemes. Cognition was assessed using MMSE and composite scores of four cognitive domains, and atrophy was measured using gray matter volume covering the major brain lobes. First, we used linear regressions to investigate associations between CSF p-tau (independent variable) and tau PET (dependent variable). Second, we used linear regressions to investigate associations between CSF p-tau, tau PET (separate independent variables, model 1), and cognition (dependent variable). We then assessed the independent effects of CSF p-tau and tau PET on cognition by simultaneously adding the other tau biomarker as a predictor (model 2). Finally, we performed the same procedure for model 1 and 2, but replaced cognition with atrophy. Models were adjusted for age, sex, time lag between assessments, education (cognition only), and total intracranial volume (atrophy only). Results Higher [18F]flortaucipir BPND was associated with higher CSF p-tau (range of standardized betas (sβ) across ROIs, 0.43–0.46; all p < 0.01). [18F]flortaucipir BPND was more strongly associated with cognition and atrophy than CSF p-tau. When [18F]flortaucipir BPND and CSF p-tau were entered simultaneously, [18F]flortaucipir BPND (range sβ = − 0.20 to – 0.57, all p < 0.05) was strongly associated with multiple cognitive domains and atrophy regions. SUVr showed comparable results to BPND. Conclusion Regional [18F]flortaucipir BPND correlated stronger with cognition and neurodegeneration than CSF p-tau, suggesting that tau PET more accurately reflects disease severity in AD. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-04758-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma M Coomans
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hayel Tuncel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hagens MHJ, Golla SSV, Janssen B, Vugts DJ, Beaino W, Windhorst AD, O’Brien-Brown J, Kassiou M, Schuit RC, Schwarte LA, de Vries HE, Killestein J, Barkhof F, van Berckel BNM, Lammertsma AA. The P2X 7 receptor tracer [ 11C]SMW139 as an in vivo marker of neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis: a first-in man study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 47:379-389. [PMID: 31705174 PMCID: PMC6974509 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04550-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The novel PET tracer [11C]SMW139 binds with high affinity to the P2X7 receptor, which is expressed on pro-inflammatory microglia. The purposes of this first in-man study were to characterise pharmacokinetics of [11C]SMW139 in patients with active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and healthy controls (HC) and to evaluate its potential to identify in vivo neuroinflammation in RRMS. Methods Five RRMS patients and 5 age-matched HC underwent 90-min dynamic [11C]SMW139 PET scans, with online continuous and manual arterial sampling to generate a metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input function. Tissue time activity curves were fitted to single- and two-tissue compartment models, and the model that provided the best fits was determined using the Akaike information criterion. Results The optimal model for describing [11C]SMW139 kinetics in both RRMS and HC was a reversible two-tissue compartment model with blood volume parameter and with the dissociation rate k4 fixed to the whole-brain value. Exploratory group level comparisons demonstrated an increased volume of distribution (VT) and binding potential (BPND) in RRMS compared with HC in normal appearing brain regions. BPND in MS lesions was decreased compared with non-lesional white matter, and a further decrease was observed in gadolinium-enhancing lesions. In contrast, increased VT was observed in enhancing lesions, possibly resulting from disruption of the blood-brain barrier in active MS lesions. In addition, there was a high correlation between parameters obtained from 60- to 90-min datasets, although analyses using 60-min data led to a slight underestimation in regional VT and BPND values. Conclusions This first in-man study demonstrated that uptake of [11C]SMW139 can be quantified with PET using BPND as a measure for specific binding in healthy controls and RRMS patients. Additional studies are warranted for further clinical evaluation of this novel neuroinflammation tracer. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04550-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes H. J. Hagens
- MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S. V. Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bieneke Janssen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle J. Vugts
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wissam Beaino
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D. Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michael Kassiou
- School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robert C. Schuit
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lothar A. Schwarte
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helga E. de Vries
- MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joep Killestein
- MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Bart N. M. van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A. Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Timmers T, Ossenkoppele R, Wolters EE, Verfaillie SCJ, Visser D, Golla SSV, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Boellaard R, van der Flier WM, van Berckel BNM. Associations between quantitative [ 18F]flortaucipir tau PET and atrophy across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. Alzheimers Res Ther 2019; 11:60. [PMID: 31272512 PMCID: PMC6610969 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-019-0510-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Neuropathological studies have linked tau aggregates to neuronal loss. To describe the spatial distribution of neurofibrillary tangle pathology in post-mortem tissue, Braak staging has been used. The aim of this study was to examine in vivo associations between tau pathology, quantified with [18F]flortaucipir PET in regions corresponding to Braak stages, and atrophy across the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) spectrum. Methods We included 100 subjects, including 58 amyloid-β positive patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 6) or AD dementia (n = 52) and 42 controls with subjective cognitive decline (36% amyloid-β positive). All subjects underwent a dynamic [18F]flortaucipir PET to generate non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) maps. We extracted average [18F]flortaucipir BPND entorhinal, Braak III–IV (limbic) and Braak V–VI (neocortical) regions of interest (ROIs). T1-weighted MRI was used to assess gray matter (GM) volumes. We performed linear regression analyses using [18F]flortaucipir BPND ROIs as independent and GM density (ROI or voxelwise) as dependent variable. Results In MCI/AD subjects (age [mean ± SD] 65 ± 8 years, MMSE 23 ± 4), [18F]flortaucipir BPND was higher than in controls (age 65 ± 8, MMSE 29 ± 1) across all ROIs (entorhinal 0.06 ± 0.21 vs 0.46 ± 0.25 p < 0.001, Braak III–IV 0.11 ± 0.10 vs 0.46 ± 0.26, p < 0.001, Braak V–VI 0.07 ± 0.07 vs 0.38 ± 0.29, p < 0.001). In MCI/AD, greater [18F]flortaucipir BPND in entorhinal cortex was associated with lower GM density in medial temporal lobe (β − 0.40, p < 0.001). Greater [18F]flortaucipir BPND in ROI Braak III–IV and Braak V–VI was associated with smaller GM density in lateral and inferior temporal, parietal, occipital, and frontal lobes (range standardized βs − 0.30 to − 0.55, p < 0.01), but not in medial temporal lobe (β − 0.22, p 0.07). [18F]Flortaucipir BPND in ROI Braak I–II was not associated with GM density loss anywhere. When quantifying [18F]flortaucipir BPND across brain lobes, we observed both local and distant associations with GM atrophy. In controls, there were no significant associations between [18F]flortaucipir BPND and GM density (standardized βs ranging from − 0.24 to 0.02, all p > 0.05). Conclusions In MCI/AD patients, [18F]flortaucipir binding in entorhinal, limbic, and neocortical regions was associated with cortical atrophy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0510-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Amsterdam Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Amsterdam Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Emma E Wolters
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Visser
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCLK, London, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Amsterdam Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Amsterdam Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Metaxas A, van Berckel BNM, Klein PJ, Verbeek J, Nash EC, Kooijman EJM, Renjaän VA, Golla SSV, Boellaard R, Christiaans JAM, Windhorst AD, Leysen JE. Binding characterization of N-(2-chloro-5-thiomethylphenyl)-N'-(3-[ 3 H] 3 methoxy phenyl)-N'-methylguanidine ([ 3 H]GMOM), a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2019; 7:e00458. [PMID: 30784206 PMCID: PMC6381215 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Revised: 12/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Labeled with carbon‐11, N‐(2‐chloro‐5‐thiomethylphenyl)‐N′‐(3‐methoxyphenyl)‐N′‐methylguanidine ([11C]GMOM) is currently the only positron emission tomography (PET) tracer that has shown selectivity for the ion‐channel site of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors in human imaging studies. The present study reports on the selectivity profile and in vitro binding properties of GMOM. The compound was screened on a panel of 80 targets, and labeled with tritium ([3H]GMOM). The binding properties of [3H]GMOM were compared to those of the reference ion‐channel ligand [3H](+)‐dizocilpine maleate ([3H]MK‐801), in a set of concentration‐response, homologous and heterologous inhibition, and association kinetics assays, performed with repeatedly washed rat forebrain preparations. GMOM was at least 70‐fold more selective for NMDA receptors compared to all other targets examined. In homologous inhibition and concentration‐response assays, the binding of [3H]GMOM was regulated by NMDA receptor agonists, albeit in a less prominent manner compared to [3H]MK‐801. Scatchard transformation of homologous inhibition data produced concave upward curves for [3H]GMOM and [3H]MK‐801. The radioligands showed bi‐exponential association kinetics in the presence of 100 μmol L−1l‐glutamate/30 μmol L−1 glycine. [3H]GMOM (3 nmol L−1 and 10 nmol L−1) was inhibited with dual affinity by (+)‐MK‐801, (R,S)‐ketamine and memantine, in both presence and absence of agonists. [3H]MK‐801 (2 nmol L−1) was inhibited in a monophasic manner by GMOM under baseline and combined agonist conditions, with an IC50 value of ~19 nmol L−1. The non‐linear Scatchard plots, biphasic inhibition by open channel blockers, and bi‐exponential kinetics of [3H]GMOM indicate a complex mechanism of interaction with the NMDA receptor ionophore. The implications for quantifying the PET signal of [11C]GMOM are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasios Metaxas
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Klein
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Verbeek
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emily C Nash
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther J M Kooijman
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Véronique A Renjaän
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes A M Christiaans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Josée E Leysen
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
van der Aart J, Golla SSV, van der Pluijm M, Schwarte LA, Schuit RC, Klein PJ, Metaxas A, Windhorst AD, Boellaard R, Lammertsma AA, van Berckel BNM. First in human evaluation of [ 18F]PK-209, a PET ligand for the ion channel binding site of NMDA receptors. EJNMMI Res 2018; 8:69. [PMID: 30054846 PMCID: PMC6063804 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0424-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Efforts to develop suitable positron emission tomography (PET) tracers for the ion channel site of human N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors have had limited success. [18F]PK-209 is a GMOM derivative that binds to the intrachannel phencyclidine site with high affinity and selectivity. Primate PET studies have shown that the volume of distribution in the brain was reduced by administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801, consistent with substantial specific binding. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate [18F]PK-209 in 10 healthy humans by assessing test–retest reproducibility and binding specificity following intravenous S-ketamine administration (0.5 mg ∙ kg−1). Five healthy subjects underwent a test–retest protocol, and five others a baseline-ketamine protocol. In all cases dynamic, 120-min PET scans were acquired together with metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input functions. Additional input functions were tested based on within-subject and population-average parent fractions. Results Best fits of the brain time-activity curves were obtained using an irreversible two-tissue compartment model with additional blood volume parameter. Mean test–retest variability of the net rate of influx Ki varied between 7 and 24% depending on the input function. There were no consistent changes in [18F]PK-209 PET parameters following ketamine administration, which may be a consequence of the complex endogenous ligand processes that affect channel gating. Conclusions The molecular interaction between [18F]PK-209 and the binding site within the NMDA receptor ion channel is insufficiently reproducible and specific to be a reliable imaging agent for its quantification. Trial registration EudraCT 2014-001735-36. Registered 28 April 2014
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper van der Aart
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke van der Pluijm
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lothar A Schwarte
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Schuit
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Klein
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Athanasios Metaxas
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Golla SSV, Timmers T, Ossenkoppele R, Groot C, Verfaillie S, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Schwarte L, Mintun MA, Devous M, Schuit RC, Windhorst AD, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R, van Berckel BNM, Yaqub M. Quantification of Tau Load Using [ 18F]AV1451 PET. Mol Imaging Biol 2018; 19:963-971. [PMID: 28374171 PMCID: PMC5662681 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-017-1080-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The tau tracer [18F]AV1451, also known as flortaucipir, is a promising ligand for imaging tau accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Most of the previous studies have quantified tau load using standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr) derived from a static [18F]AV1451 scan. SUVr may, however, be flow dependent and, especially for longitudinal studies, should be validated against a fully quantitative approach. The objective of this study was to identify the optimal tracer kinetic model for measuring tau load using [18F]AV1451. Procedures Following intravenous injection of 225 ± 16 MBq [18F]AV1451, 130 min dynamic PET scans were performed in five biomarker confirmed AD patients and five controls. Arterial blood sampling was performed to obtain a metabolite-corrected plasma input function. Next, regional time–activity curves were generated using PVElab software. These curves were analysed using several pharmacokinetic models. Results The reversible single tissue compartment model (1T2k_VB) was the preferred model for all but one control. For AD patients, however, model preference shifted towards a reversible two tissue compartmental model (2T4k_VB). The simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) derived binding potential (BPND) showed good correlation (AD: r2 = 0.87, slope = 1.06; controls: r2 = 0.87, slope = 0.86) with indirect plasma input binding (distribution volume ratio-1). Standardized uptake value ratios (80–100 min) correlated well with DVR (r2 = 0.93, slope = 1.07) and SRTM-derived BPND (r2 = 0.84, slope = 0.95). In addition, regional differences in tracer binding between subject groups in different tau-specific regions were observed. Conclusions Model preference of [18F]AV1451 appears to depend on subject status and, in particular, VT. The relationship between model preference and VT suggests that (higher) tau load may be reflected by a second tissue compartment. Nevertheless, consistent results can be obtained using a 2T4k_VB model. In addition, SRTM can be used to derive BPND. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11307-017-1080-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Tessa Timmers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Colin Groot
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sander Verfaillie
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lothar Schwarte
- Department of Anaesthesiology, VU University Medical center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Robert C Schuit
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Alzheimer Center & Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Golla SSV, Adriaanse SM, Yaqub M, Windhorst AD, Lammertsma AA, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R. Model selection criteria for dynamic brain PET studies. EJNMMI Phys 2017; 4:30. [PMID: 29209862 PMCID: PMC5716967 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several criteria exist to identify the optimal model for quantification of tracer kinetics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correspondence in kinetic model preference identification for brain PET studies among five model selection criteria: Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), AIC unbiased (AICC), model selection criterion (MSC), Schwartz Criterion (SC), and F-test. Materials and Methods Six tracers were evaluated: [11C]FMZ, [11C]GMOM, [11C]PK11195, [11C]Raclopride, [18F]FDG, and [11C]PHT, including data from five subjects per tracer. Time activity curves (TACs) were analysed using six plasma input models: reversible single-tissue model (1T2k), irreversible two-tissue model (2T3k), and reversible two-tissue model (2T4k), all with and without blood volume fraction parameter (VB). For each tracer and criterion, the percentage of TACs preferring a certain model was calculated. Results For all radiotracers, strong agreement was seen across the model selection criteria. The F-test was considered as the reference, as it is a frequently used hypothesis test. The F-test confirmed the AIC preferred model in 87% of all cases. The strongest (but minimal) disagreement across regional TACs was found when comparing AIC with AICC. Despite these regional discrepancies, same preferred kinetic model was obtained using all criteria, with an exception of one FMZ subject. Conclusion In conclusion, all five model selection criteria resulted in similar conclusions with only minor differences that did not affect overall model selection. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40658-017-0197-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sofie M Adriaanse
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, P.O. 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Golla SSV, Lubberink M, van Berckel BNM, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R. Partial volume correction of brain PET studies using iterative deconvolution in combination with HYPR denoising. EJNMMI Res 2017; 7:36. [PMID: 28432674 PMCID: PMC5400775 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-017-0284-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Accurate quantification of PET studies depends on the spatial resolution of the PET data. The commonly limited PET resolution results in partial volume effects (PVE). Iterative deconvolution methods (IDM) have been proposed as a means to correct for PVE. IDM improves spatial resolution of PET studies without the need for structural information (e.g. MR scans). On the other hand, deconvolution also increases noise, which results in lower signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). The aim of this study was to implement IDM in combination with HighlY constrained back-PRojection (HYPR) denoising to mitigate poor SNR properties of conventional IDM. Methods An anthropomorphic Hoffman brain phantom was filled with an [18F]FDG solution of ~25 kBq mL−1 and scanned for 30 min on a Philips Ingenuity TF PET/CT scanner (Philips, Cleveland, USA) using a dynamic brain protocol with various frame durations ranging from 10 to 300 s. Van Cittert IDM was used for PVC of the scans. In addition, HYPR was used to improve SNR of the dynamic PET images, applying it both before and/or after IDM. The Hoffman phantom dataset was used to optimise IDM parameters (number of iterations, type of algorithm, with/without HYPR) and the order of HYPR implementation based on the best average agreement of measured and actual activity concentrations in the regions. Next, dynamic [11C]flumazenil (five healthy subjects) and [11C]PIB (four healthy subjects and four patients with Alzheimer’s disease) scans were used to assess the impact of IDM with and without HYPR on plasma input-derived distribution volumes (VT) across various regions of the brain. Results In the case of [11C]flumazenil scans, Hypr-IDM-Hypr showed an increase of 5 to 20% in the regional VT whereas a 0 to 10% increase or decrease was seen in the case of [11C]PIB depending on the volume of interest or type of subject (healthy or patient). References for these comparisons were the VTs from the PVE-uncorrected scans. Conclusions IDM improved quantitative accuracy of measured activity concentrations. Moreover, the use of IDM in combination with HYPR (Hypr-IDM-Hypr) was able to correct for PVE without increasing noise. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13550-017-0284-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark Lubberink
- Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tovedal T, Lubberink M, Morell A, Estrada S, Golla SSV, Myrdal G, Lindblom RPF, Thelin S, Sörensen J, Antoni G, Lennmyr F. Blood Flow Quantitation by Positron Emission Tomography During Selective Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 103:610-616. [PMID: 27592601 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Revised: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/06/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perfusion strategies during aortic surgery usually comprise hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA), often combined with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) or retrograde cerebral perfusion. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is a fundamental parameter for which the optimal level has not been clearly defined. We sought to determine the CBF at a pump flow level of 6 mL/kg/min, previously shown likely to provide adequate SACP at 20°C in pigs. METHODS Repeated positron emission tomography (PET) scans were used to quantify the CBF and glucose metabolism throughout HCA and SACP including cooling and rewarming. Eight pigs on cardiopulmonary bypass were assigned to either HCA alone (n = 4) or HCA+SACP (n = 4). The CBF was measured by repeated [15O]water PET scans from baseline to rewarming. The cerebral glucose metabolism was examined by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET scans after rewarming to 37°C. RESULTS Cooling to 20°C decreased the cortical CBF from 0.31 ± 0.06 at baseline to 0.10 ± 0.02 mL/cm3/min (p = 0.008). The CBF was maintained stable by SACP of 6 mL/kg/min during 45 minutes. After rewarming to 37°C, the mean CBF increased to 0.24 ± 0.07 mL/cm3/min, without significant differences between the groups at any time-point exclusive of the HCA period. The net cortical uptake (Ki) of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose after rewarming showed no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Cooling autoregulated the CBF to 0.10 mL/cm3/min, and 45 minutes of SACP at 6 mL/kg/min maintained the CBF in the present model. Cerebral glucose metabolism after rewarming was similar in the study groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Tovedal
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Mark Lubberink
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Arvid Morell
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sergio Estrada
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Preclinical PET Platform, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Myrdal
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Thoracic Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Rickard P F Lindblom
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Thoracic Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Stefan Thelin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Thoracic Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jens Sörensen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Antoni
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Preclinical PET Platform, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Lennmyr
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Golla SSV, Boellaard R, Oikonen V, Hoffmann A, van Berckel BNM, Windhorst AD, Virta J, Te Beek ET, Groeneveld GJ, Haaparanta-Solin M, Luoto P, Savisto N, Solin O, Valencia R, Thiele A, Eriksson J, Schuit RC, Lammertsma AA, Rinne JO. Parametric Binding Images of the TSPO Ligand 18F-DPA-714. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:1543-1547. [PMID: 27261521 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.173013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
18F-labeled N,N-diethyl-2-(2-[4-(2-fluoroethoxy)phenyl]-5,7-dimethylpyrazolo[1,5-α]pyrimidine-3-yl)acetamide (DPA-714) is a radioligand for the 18-kDa translocator protein. The purpose of the present study was to identify the best method for generating quantitative parametric images of 18F-DPA-714 binding. METHODS Ninety-minute dynamic 18F-DPA-714 PET scans with full arterial sampling from 6 healthy subjects and 9 Alzheimer disease (AD) patients were used. Plasma-input-based Logan graphical analysis and spectral analysis were used to generate parametric volume of distribution (VT) images. Five versions of Ichise, reference Logan, and 2 basis function implementations (receptor parametric mapping and simplified reference tissue model 2 [SRTM2]) of SRTM, all using gray matter cerebellum as the reference region, were applied to generate nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) images. RESULTS Plasma-input Logan analysis (r2 = 0.99; slope, 0.88) and spectral analysis (r2 = 0.99, slope, 0.93) generated estimates of VT that correlated well with values obtained using nonlinear regression. BPND values generated using SRTM2 (r2 = 0.83; slope, 0.95) and reference Logan analysis (r2 = 0.88; slope, 1.01) correlated well with nonlinear regression-based estimates. CONCLUSION Both Logan analysis and spectral analysis can be used to obtain quantitatively accurate VT images of 18F-DPA-714. In addition, SRTM2 and reference Logan analysis can provide accurate BPND images. These parametric images could be used for voxel-based comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vesa Oikonen
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jere Virta
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | | | - Pauliina Luoto
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Nina Savisto
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Olof Solin
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | - Jonas Eriksson
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Schuit
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juha O Rinne
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
van der Doef TF, Golla SSV, Klein PJ, Oropeza-Seguias GM, Schuit RC, Metaxas A, Jobse E, Schwarte LA, Windhorst AD, Lammertsma AA, van Berckel BNM, Boellaard R. Quantification of the novel N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor ligand [11C]GMOM in man. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016; 36:1111-21. [PMID: 26661185 PMCID: PMC4904354 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x15608391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 06/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
[(11)C]GMOM (carbon-11 labeled N-(2-chloro-5-thiomethylphenyl)-N'-(3-[(11)C]methoxy-phenyl)-N'-methylguanidine) is a PET ligand that binds to the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor with high specificity and affinity. The purpose of this first in human study was to evaluate kinetics of [(11)C]GMOM in the healthy human brain and to identify the optimal pharmacokinetic model for quantifying these kinetics, both before and after a pharmacological dose of S-ketamine. Dynamic 90 min [(11)C]GMOM PET scans were obtained from 10 subjects. In six of the 10 subjects, a second PET scan was performed following an S-ketamine challenge. Metabolite corrected plasma input functions were obtained for all scans. Regional time activity curves were fitted to various single- and two-tissue compartment models. Best fits were obtained using a two-tissue irreversible model with blood volume parameter. The highest net influx rate (Ki) of [(11)C]GMOM was observed in regions with high N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor density, such as hippocampus and thalamus. A significant reduction in the Ki was observed for the entire brain after administration of ketamine, suggesting specific binding to the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors. This initial study suggests that the [(11)C]GMOM could be used for quantification of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thalia F van der Doef
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Klein
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gisela M Oropeza-Seguias
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Schuit
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Athanasios Metaxas
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Jobse
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lothar A Schwarte
- Department of Anesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Golla SSV, Klein PJ, Bakker J, Schuit RC, Christiaans JAM, van Geest L, Kooijman EJM, Oropeza-Seguias GM, Langermans JAM, Leysen JE, Boellaard R, Windhorst AD, van Berckel BNM, Metaxas A. Preclinical evaluation of [(18)F]PK-209, a new PET ligand for imaging the ion-channel site of NMDA receptors. Nucl Med Biol 2014; 42:205-12. [PMID: 25451213 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2014] [Revised: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 09/23/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The present study was designed to assess whether [(18)F]PK-209 (3-(2-chloro-5-(methylthio)phenyl)-1-(3-([(18)F]fluoromethoxy)phenyl)-1-methylguanidine) is a suitable ligand for imaging the ion-channel site of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDArs) using positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS Dynamic PET scans were acquired from male rhesus monkeys over 120min, at baseline and after the acute administration of dizocilpine (MK-801, 0.3mg/kg; n=3/condition). Continuous and discrete arterial blood samples were manually obtained, to generate metabolite-corrected input functions. Parametric volume-of-distribution (VT) images were obtained using Logan analysis. The selectivity profile of PK-209 was assessed in vitro, on a broad screen of 79 targets. RESULTS PK-209 was at least 50-fold more selective for NMDArs over all other targets examined. At baseline, prolonged retention of radioactivity was observed in NMDAr-rich cortical regions relative to the cerebellum. Pretreatment with MK-801 reduced the VT of [(18)F]PK-209 compared with baseline in two of three subjects. The rate of radioligand metabolism was high, both at baseline and after MK-801 administration. CONCLUSIONS PK-209 targets the intrachannel site with high selectivity. Imaging of the NMDAr is feasible with [(18)F]PK-209, despite its fast metabolism. Further in vivo evaluation in humans is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Klein
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jaco Bakker
- Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, the Netherlands
| | - Robert C Schuit
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes A M Christiaans
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leo van Geest
- Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, the Netherlands
| | - Esther J M Kooijman
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gisela M Oropeza-Seguias
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Josée E Leysen
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Athanasios Metaxas
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Frings V, Yaqub M, Hoyng LL, Golla SSV, Windhorst AD, Schuit RC, Lammertsma AA, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, Boellaard R. Assessment of simplified methods to measure 18F-FLT uptake changes in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. J Nucl Med 2014; 55:1417-23. [PMID: 24970910 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.140913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) PET/CT provides a noninvasive assessment of proliferation and, as such, could be a valuable imaging biomarker in oncology. The aim of the present study was to assess the validity of simplified quantitative parameters of (18)F-FLT uptake in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients before and after the start of treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). METHODS Ten patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring an activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation were included in this prospective observational study. Patients underwent (15)O-H2O and (18)F-FLT PET/CT scanning on 3 separate occasions: within 7 d before treatment, and 7 and 28 d after the first therapeutic dose of a TKI (gefitinib or erlotinib). Dynamic scans were acquired and venous blood samples were collected during the (18)F-FLT scan to measure parent fraction and plasma and whole-blood radioactivity concentrations. Simplified measures (standardized uptake value [SUV] and tumor-to-blood ratio [TBR]) were correlated with fully quantitative measures derived from kinetic modeling. RESULTS Twenty-nine of thirty (18)F-FLT PET/CT scans were evaluable. According to the Akaike criterion, a reversible 2-tissue model with 4 rate constants and blood volume parameter was preferred in 84% of cases. Relative therapy-induced changes in SUV and TBR correlated with those derived from kinetic analyses (r(2) = 0.83-0.97, P < 0.001, slope = 0.72-1.12). (18)F-FLT uptake significantly decreased at 7 and 28 d after the start of treatment compared with baseline (P < 0.01). Changes in (18)F-FLT uptake were not correlated with changes in perfusion, as measured using (15)O-H2O. CONCLUSION SUV and TBR could both be used as surrogate simplified measures to assess changes in (18)F-FLT uptake in NSCLC patients treated with a TKI, at the cost of a small underestimation in uptake changes or the need for a blood sample and metabolite measurement, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Frings
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Lieke L Hoyng
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Sandeep S V Golla
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Robert C Schuit
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Otto S Hoekstra
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Egbert F Smit
- Department of Pulmonology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | | |
Collapse
|