The specialized pediatric palliative care service in Italy: how is it working? Results of the nationwide PalliPed study

BACKGROUND

Accurate estimation of the specialized pediatric palliative care (PPC) burden and the definition of the extent and quality of PPC service in Italy represent urgent needs to enable the proper allocation of PPC resources and the definition of prevention and educational plans. The PalliPed project aimed to provide the first comprehensive assessment of the characteristics of Italian patients requiring PPC, the quality and extent of regional PPC networks/facilities, and the number of dedicated resources. In this paper, we present the results of the second part of the project, regarding the implementation and quality of PPC services in Italy.

METHODS

The PalliPed study had an observational cross-sectional design. All Italian specialized PPC centers/facilities were invited to participate in the project and complete a survey on the characteristics of PPC centers/facilities in different care settings, reporting data as of 24 October 2022. Data were collected online.

RESULTS

19 PPC specialized centers/facilities from 12 Italian regions and two autonomous provinces responded to the survey. Among them, 11 are regional referral centers. Seven Italian regions out of 20 reported no PPC centers/facilities, mainly in central-southern Italy. Less than half (45%) of the regional referral centers cover the entire regional territory, and three offer 24/7 service. Ten centers have a dedicated team. Half of the eight non-referral centers offer 24/7 service and have a dedicated team. A total of 1,092 patients were reported by 18 centers as of 24 October 2022. Over the years, an increasing number of patients has been reported, rising from 1,202 (2019) to 1,544 (2021). The dedicated staff is inadequate, and most healthcare providers are not recognized at an institutional level. A shortage of 'young' staff and a lack of specific training was reported, particularly among nurses (77% had no training in PPC).

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained show how training, information, and research interventions are still necessary for the reorganization of the available resources and definition of proper strategies to respond dynamically to the new emerging needs of these populations. At the same time, our study represents a first step in defining a national registry of PPC models, useful for monitoring evolutions, and critical issues and planning any new or corrective strategy.

Lentiviral hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy in patients with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome

Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is an inherited immunodeficiency caused by mutations in the gene encoding WASP, a protein regulating the cytoskeleton. Hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) transplants can be curative, but, when matched donors are unavailable, infusion of autologous HSPCs modified ex vivo by gene therapy is an alternative approach. We used a lentiviral vector encoding functional WASP to genetically correct HSPCs from three WAS patients and reinfused the cells after a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. All three patients showed stable engraftment of WASP-expressing cells and improvements in platelet counts, immune functions, and clinical scores. Vector integration analyses revealed highly polyclonal and multilineage haematopoiesis resulting from the gene-corrected HSPCs. Lentiviral gene therapy did not induce selection of integrations near oncogenes, and no aberrant clonal expansion was observed after 20 to 32 months. Although extended clinical observation is required to establish long-term safety, lentiviral gene therapy represents a promising treatment for WAS.

Functional type 1 regulatory T cells develop regardless of FOXP3 mutations in patients with IPEX syndrome

Mutations of forkhead box p3 (FOXP3), the master gene for naturally occurring regulatory T cells (nTregs), are responsible for the impaired function of nTregs, resulting in an autoimmune disease known as the immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome. The relevance of other peripheral tolerance mechanisms, such as the presence and function of type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells, the major adaptive IL-10-producing Treg subset, in patients with IPEX syndrome remains to be clarified. FOXP3^mutated Tr1-polarized cells, differentiated in vitro from CD4⁺ T cells of four IPEX patients, were enriched in IL-10⁺IL-4⁻IFN-γ⁺ T cells, a cytokine production profile specific for Tr1 cells, and expressed low levels of FOXP3 and high levels of Granzyme-B. IPEX Tr1 cells were hypoproliferative and suppressive, thus indicating that FOXP3 mutations did not impair their function. Furthermore, we isolated Tr1 cell clones from the peripheral blood of one FOXP3^null patient, demonstrating that Tr1 cells are present in vivo and they can be expanded in vitro in the absence of WT FOXP3. Overall, our results (i) show that functional Tr1 cells differentiate independently of FOXP3, (ii) confirm that human Tr1 and nTregs are distinct T-cell lineages, and (iii) suggest that under favorable conditions Tr1 cells could exert regulatory functions in IPEX patients.

Molecular regulation of cellular immunity by FOXP3

The immune system is responsible for not only eliminating threats to the body, but also for protecting the body from its own immune responses that would cause harm if left unchecked. Forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3) is a forkhead family member with an important role in the development and function of a type of CD4+ T cell called T regulatory cells that is fundamental for maintaining immune tolerance to self. This chapter reviews the structure of FOXP3 and how its role in the immune system was discovered. Studies of patients with mutations in FOXP3 who suffer from a syndrome known as IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, x-linked) are also discussed. Investigation into how expression of FOXP3 is regulated and how it interacts with other proteins have recently provided considerable insight into mechanisms by which the lack of this protein could cause disease. We also discuss how FOXP3 is involved in the reciprocal development ofT regulatory cells and proinflammatory T-cells that produce IL-17. A better understanding of how FOXP3 is regulated and the molecular basis for its function will ultimately contribute to the development ofT regulatory cell-based cellular therapies that could be used to restore dysregulated immune responses.

STAT5-signaling cytokines regulate the expression of FOXP3 in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and CD4+CD25- effector T cells

Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) is considered a specific marker for CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T (Treg) cells, but increasing evidence suggests that human CD4(+)CD25(-) effector T (Teff) cells can transiently express FOXP3 upon activation. We demonstrate that the signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5)-signaling cytokines, IL-2, IL-15 and to a lesser extent IL-7, induce FOXP3 up-regulation in vitro in activated human Teff cells. In contrast, cytokines which do not activate STAT5, such as IL-4 or transforming growth factor-beta alone, do not directly induce FOXP3 expression in activated Teff cells. Moreover, expression of a constitutively active form of STAT5a is sufficient to induce FOXP3 expression in Teff cells. Expression of FOXP3 in activated Teff cells requires both TCR-mediated activation and endogenous IL-2, but is not dependent on cell division and does not induce suppressive function. The presence of STAT5-activating cytokines is also required to maintain high FOXP3 expression and suppressive activity of Treg cells in vitro. These data indicate that activation of STAT5 sustains FOXP3 expression in both Treg and Teff cells and contribute to our understanding of how cytokines affect the expression of FOXP3.