1
|
Mangiameli SM, Chen H, Earl AS, Dobkin JA, Lesman D, Buenrostro JD, Chen F. Photoselective sequencing: microscopically guided genomic measurements with subcellular resolution. Nat Methods 2023; 20:686-694. [PMID: 37106232 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-01845-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
In biological systems, spatial organization and function are interconnected. Here we present photoselective sequencing, a new method for genomic and epigenomic profiling within morphologically distinct regions. Starting with an intact biological specimen, photoselective sequencing uses targeted illumination to selectively unblock a photocaged fragment library, restricting the sequencing-based readout to microscopically identified spatial regions. We validate photoselective sequencing by measuring the chromatin accessibility profiles of fluorescently labeled cell types within the mouse brain and comparing with published data. Furthermore, by combining photoselective sequencing with a computational strategy for decomposing bulk accessibility profiles, we find that the oligodendrocyte-lineage-cell population is relatively enriched for oligodendrocyte-progenitor cells in the cortex versus the corpus callosum. Finally, we leverage photoselective sequencing at the subcellular scale to identify features of chromatin that are correlated with positioning at the nuclear periphery. These results collectively demonstrate that photoselective sequencing is a flexible and generalizable platform for exploring the interplay of spatial structures with genomic and epigenomic properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Mangiameli
- Gene Regulation Observatory, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Haiqi Chen
- Gene Regulation Observatory, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Cecil H. and Ida Green Center for Reproductive Biology Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrew S Earl
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Julie A Dobkin
- Gene Regulation Observatory, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Lesman
- Gene Regulation Observatory, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jason D Buenrostro
- Gene Regulation Observatory, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | - Fei Chen
- Gene Regulation Observatory, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Payne AC, Chiang ZD, Reginato PL, Mangiameli SM, Murray EM, Yao CC, Markoulaki S, Earl AS, Labade AS, Jaenisch R, Church GM, Boyden ES, Buenrostro JD, Chen F. In situ genome sequencing resolves DNA sequence and structure in intact biological samples. Science 2021; 371:eaay3446. [PMID: 33384301 PMCID: PMC7962746 DOI: 10.1126/science.aay3446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Understanding genome organization requires integration of DNA sequence and three-dimensional spatial context; however, existing genome-wide methods lack either base pair sequence resolution or direct spatial localization. Here, we describe in situ genome sequencing (IGS), a method for simultaneously sequencing and imaging genomes within intact biological samples. We applied IGS to human fibroblasts and early mouse embryos, spatially localizing thousands of genomic loci in individual nuclei. Using these data, we characterized parent-specific changes in genome structure across embryonic stages, revealed single-cell chromatin domains in zygotes, and uncovered epigenetic memory of global chromosome positioning within individual embryos. These results demonstrate how IGS can directly connect sequence and structure across length scales from single base pairs to whole organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew C Payne
- Media Arts and Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Zachary D Chiang
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Paul L Reginato
- Media Arts and Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
- Department of Biological Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Evan M Murray
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Chun-Chen Yao
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | | - Andrew S Earl
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Ajay S Labade
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Rudolf Jaenisch
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Department of Biology, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - George M Church
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Edward S Boyden
- Media Arts and Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
- Department of Biological Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- McGovern Institute, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Koch Institute, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Centers for Neurobiological Engineering and Extreme Bionics, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Jason D Buenrostro
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Fei Chen
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ting SY, Bosch DE, Mangiameli SM, Radey MC, Huang S, Park YJ, Kelly KA, Filip SK, Goo YA, Eng JK, Allaire M, Veesler D, Wiggins PA, Peterson SB, Mougous JD. Bifunctional Immunity Proteins Protect Bacteria against FtsZ-Targeting ADP-Ribosylating Toxins. Cell 2018; 175:1380-1392.e14. [PMID: 30343895 PMCID: PMC6239978 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
ADP-ribosylation of proteins can profoundly impact their function and serves as an effective mechanism by which bacterial toxins impair eukaryotic cell processes. Here, we report the discovery that bacteria also employ ADP-ribosylating toxins against each other during interspecies competition. We demonstrate that one such toxin from Serratia proteamaculans interrupts the division of competing cells by modifying the essential bacterial tubulin-like protein, FtsZ, adjacent to its protomer interface, blocking its capacity to polymerize. The structure of the toxin in complex with its immunity determinant revealed two distinct modes of inhibition: active site occlusion and enzymatic removal of ADP-ribose modifications. We show that each is sufficient to support toxin immunity; however, the latter additionally provides unprecedented broad protection against non-cognate ADP-ribosylating effectors. Our findings reveal how an interbacterial arms race has produced a unique solution for safeguarding the integrity of bacterial cell division machinery against inactivating post-translational modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- See-Yeun Ting
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Dustin E Bosch
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | - Matthew C Radey
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Shuo Huang
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Young-Jun Park
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Katherine A Kelly
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | - Young Ah Goo
- Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Jimmy K Eng
- Proteomics Resource, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Marc Allaire
- Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - David Veesler
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Paul A Wiggins
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - S Brook Peterson
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Joseph D Mougous
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mangiameli SM, Cass JA, Merrikh H, Wiggins PA. The bacterial replisome has factory-like localization. Curr Genet 2018; 64:1029-1036. [PMID: 29632994 DOI: 10.1007/s00294-018-0830-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Revised: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication is essential to cellular proliferation. The cellular-scale organization of the replication machinery (replisome) and the replicating chromosome has remained controversial. Two competing models describe the replication process: In the track model, the replisomes translocate along the DNA like a train on a track. Alternately, in the factory model, the replisomes form a stationary complex through which the DNA is pulled. We summarize the evidence for each model and discuss a number of confounding aspects that complicate interpretation of the observations. We advocate a factory-like model for bacterial replication where the replisomes form a relatively stationary and weakly associated complex that can transiently separate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Mangiameli
- Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Julie A Cass
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Houra Merrikh
- Department of Microbiology, Health Sciences Building, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Paul A Wiggins
- Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mangiameli SM, Veit BT, Merrikh H, Wiggins PA. The Replisomes Remain Spatially Proximal throughout the Cell Cycle in Bacteria. PLoS Genet 2017; 13:e1006582. [PMID: 28114307 PMCID: PMC5293282 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Revised: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The positioning of the DNA replication machinery (replisome) has been the subject of several studies. Two conflicting models for replisome localization have been proposed: In the Factory Model, sister replisomes remain spatially co-localized as the replicating DNA is translocated through a stationary replication factory. In the Track Model, sister replisomes translocate independently along a stationary DNA track and the replisomes are spatially separated for the majority of the cell cycle. Here, we used time-lapse imaging to observe and quantify the position of fluorescently labeled processivity-clamp (DnaN) complexes throughout the cell cycle in two highly-divergent bacterial model organisms: Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. Because DnaN is a core component of the replication machinery, its localization patterns should be an appropriate proxy for replisome positioning in general. We present automated statistical analysis of DnaN positioning in large populations, which is essential due to the high degree of cell-to-cell variation. We find that both bacteria show remarkably similar DnaN positioning, where any potential separation of the two replication forks remains below the diffraction limit throughout the majority of the replication cycle. Additionally, the localization pattern of several other core replisome components is consistent with that of DnaN. These data altogether indicate that the two replication forks remain spatially co-localized and mostly function in close proximity throughout the replication cycle. The conservation of the observed localization patterns in these highly divergent species suggests that the subcellular positioning of the replisome is a functionally critical feature of DNA replication. Cell proliferation depends on efficient replication of the genome. Bacteria typically have a single origin of replication on a circular chromosome. After replication initiation, two replisomes assemble at the origin and each copy one of the two arms of the chromosome until they reach the terminus. There have been conflicting reports about the subcellular positioning and putative co-localization of the two replication forks during this process. It has remained controversial whether the two replisomes remain relatively close to each other with the DNA being pulled through, or separate as they translocate along the DNA like a track. Existing studies have relied heavily on snapshot images and these experiments cannot unambiguously distinguish between these two models: i.e. two resolvable forks versus two pairs of co-localized forks. The ability of replication to re-initiate before cell division in bacterial cells further complicates the interpretation of these types of imaging studies. In this paper, we use a combination of snapshot imaging, time-lapse imaging, and quantitative analysis to measure the fraction of time forks are co-localized during each cell cycle. We find that the forks are co-localized for the majority (80%) of the replication cycle in two highly-divergent model organisms: B. subtilis and E. coli. Our observations are consistent with proximal localization of the two forks, but also some transient separations of sister forks during replication. The conserved behavior of sub-cellular positioning of the replisomes in these two highly divergent species implies a potential functional relevance of this feature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M. Mangiameli
- Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Brian T. Veit
- Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Houra Merrikh
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- * E-mail: (HM); (PAW)
| | - Paul A. Wiggins
- Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- * E-mail: (HM); (PAW)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
The canonical model of DNA replication describes a highly-processive and largely continuous process by which the genome is duplicated. This continuous model is based upon in vitro reconstitution and in vivo ensemble experiments. Here, we characterize the replisome-complex stoichiometry and dynamics with single-molecule resolution in bacterial cells. Strikingly, the stoichiometries of the replicative helicase, DNA polymerase, and clamp loader complexes are consistent with the presence of only one active replisome in a significant fraction of cells (>40%). Furthermore, many of the observed complexes have short lifetimes (<8 min), suggesting that replisome disassembly is quite prevalent, possibly occurring several times per cell cycle. The instability of the replisome complex is conflict-induced: transcription inhibition stabilizes these complexes, restoring the second replisome in many of the cells. Our results suggest that, in contrast to the canonical model, DNA replication is a largely discontinuous process in vivo due to pervasive replication-transcription conflicts. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19848.001
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paul A Wiggins
- Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.,Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| | - Houra Merrikh
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States.,Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mangiameli SM, Merrikh CN, Wiggins PA, Merrikh H. Transcription leads to pervasive replisome instability in bacteria. eLife 2017; 6. [PMID: 28092263 DOI: 10.7554/elife.19848.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2017] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The canonical model of DNA replication describes a highly-processive and largely continuous process by which the genome is duplicated. This continuous model is based upon in vitro reconstitution and in vivo ensemble experiments. Here, we characterize the replisome-complex stoichiometry and dynamics with single-molecule resolution in bacterial cells. Strikingly, the stoichiometries of the replicative helicase, DNA polymerase, and clamp loader complexes are consistent with the presence of only one active replisome in a significant fraction of cells (>40%). Furthermore, many of the observed complexes have short lifetimes (<8 min), suggesting that replisome disassembly is quite prevalent, possibly occurring several times per cell cycle. The instability of the replisome complex is conflict-induced: transcription inhibition stabilizes these complexes, restoring the second replisome in many of the cells. Our results suggest that, in contrast to the canonical model, DNA replication is a largely discontinuous process in vivo due to pervasive replication-transcription conflicts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paul A Wiggins
- Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| | - Houra Merrikh
- Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mangiameli SM, Wiggins PA, Merrikh H, Merrikh C. Vizualizing Repliication Restart Process In Vivo with Single-Molecule Sensitivity. Biophys J 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.1602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|