Granulocyte-colony-stimulating Factor-resistant Neutropenia and Polyneuropathy Presenting as Severe Complications of Sjögren's Syndrome

Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) has multi-dimensional manifestations, including neutropenia and polyneuropathy. We herein report a 76-year-old woman with pSS initially presenting as severe granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-refractory neutropenia and axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathies (SMP). Systemic glucocorticoid administration had reduced neutrophil-associated immunoglobulin G (NAIgG) on the neutrophil surface as detected using flow cytometry, resulting in the development of neutropenia. A patient with pSS concomitant with axonal SMP might show severe neutropenia as aggressive autoimmune disease. Neutropenia can be treated with systemic glucocorticoids based on the assessment of NAIgG on the neutrophil surface.

Proximal femoral nail for treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures

PURPOSE

To report outcomes of 87 consecutive patients treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFN) for trochanteric femoral fractures.

METHODS

17 men and 70 women aged 58 to 95 (mean, 85) years with trochanteric femoral fractures underwent PFN fixation using an intramedullary nail, a lag screw, and a hip pin. Fractures were classified according to the AO system; the most common fracture type was A2 (n=45), followed by A1 (n=36) and A3 (n=6). The position of the lag screw within the femoral head was measured. The lateral slide of the lag screw after fracture consolidation was measured by comparing the immediate postoperative and final anteroposterior radiographs.

RESULTS

90% of lag screws were placed in an optimal position. The length of lateral slide of the lag screw in stable A1 fractures was significantly less than that in unstable A2 fractures; it was over 10 mm in 7 of 45 patients with A2 fractures. Cut-out of lag screw did not occur, suggesting that free sliding of the lag screw facilitates direct impaction between fragments.

CONCLUSION

A PFN is useful for the treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures.

Hepatocyte growth factor and interleukin-6 in combination with prostate volume are possible prostate cancer tumor markers in patients with gray-zone PSA levels

The aim was to assess whether hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and interleukin (IL)-6 in combination with prostate volume are able to accurately detect prostate cancer in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. A total of 159 patients with PSA levels of <10 ng ml(-1) were enrolled. Forty-two (35.3%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer, whereas 117 (64.7%) had no cancer and were used as benign group. HGF and IL-6 density (HGFD and IL-6D, respectively) values were calculated by dividing serum HGF and IL-6 levels with prostate volume. Median IL-6 (2.3 pg ml(-1)) levels for the prostate cancer group were significantly higher than those for the benign group before adjustment for age (1.7 pg ml(-1)) (P=0.0098). After age adjustments, median IL-6 (2.17 pg ml(-1)), HGFD (0.00972 ng ml(-1) cm(-3)), and IL-6D (0.0848 pg ml(-1) cm(-3)) values for the prostate cancer group were significantly higher than those for the benign group (IL-6, 1.78 pg ml(-1); HGFD, 0.00732 ng/ml/cc; and IL-6D, 0.049 pg/ml/cc; P=0.0416, 0.007 and 0.0005, respectively). In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the areas under the curves for HGFD (0.64) and IL-6D (0.68) were significantly greater than those for HGF (0.52) and IL-6 (0.61) (P=0.0006 and 0.019, respectively). With an HGFD cutoff value of 0.00392 ng ml(-1) cm(-3) (sensitivity=100%, specificity=11%), 11.1% of the benign group were able to avoid unnecessary biopsies without missing prostate cancer. HGF and IL-6 levels in combination with prostate volume were shown to be useful parameters for prostate cancer screening in patients with gray-zone PSA levels.

Kidney transplantation in patients receiving dialysis treatment for more than 10 years

In the present single center study, we analyzed 277 kidney transplant patients (procedures performed between February 1984 and February 2006) to determine the impact of long-term dialysis on kidney transplant outcomes. Forty-four had been treated prior to renal transplantation with dialysis for more than 10 years (range, 10.0-32.5 years, average, 16.6 years; Group I), while the remaining 233 recipients showed an average end-stage renal disease period of 2.8 years (range, 0-9.8 years; Group II). There were no significant differences in patient survivals between the 2 groups: 97.3% vs 97.4% at 1 year; 85.7% vs 92.4% at 5 years; 85.7% vs 90.7% at 10 years (P = .2347). Five Group I patients died: 2 from infections, 2 from liver dysfunction, and 1 from cerebral bleeding. These causes of death were similar to those among Group II patients. Graft survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups: 95% vs 88.8% at 1 year; 75.5% vs 76.5% at 5 years; 75.5% vs 65.5% at 10 years (P = .6264). Our results suggested that dialysis treatment for more than 10 years did not have negative effects on posttransplantation patient and graft survival.

Retrospective Study of the Effects of Cyclosporine in Comparison With Azathioprine on Renal Transplant Recipients Infected With Hepatitis C Virus

A recent report noted that cyclosporine (CsA) inhibits replication of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in vitro. Thus, CsA may be a superior immunosuppressant for renal transplant recipients infected with HCV. In the present retrospective study, we assessed whether CsA reduced the clinical impact of HCV infection among those patients. A total of 405 renal transplants were performed between 1973 and 2005, of whom we studied 189 who received CsA-based immunosuppression (CsA group) vs 108 who received an azathioprine-based regimen (AZA group). There were 44 HCVAb carriers and 145 noncarriers in the CsA group, and 41 carriers and 67 noncarriers in the AZA group. Our results showed that patient survival rate was significantly worse among HCVAb carriers than among noncarriers, as the overall survival rates were 82.9% and 90.9%, respectively, after 10 years and 71.5% and 85.7%, respectively, after 20 years (P = .0003). Patient survival rates were also significantly worse in HCVAb carriers than in noncarriers in both groups, which were 83.2% and 95.0%, respectively, after 10 years, and 74.7% and 88.8%, respectively, after 20 years (P = .0147) in the CsA group, and 82.9% and 83.6%, respectively, after 10 years and 70.7% and 80.6%, respectively, after 20 years (P = .0171) in the AZA group. Conversely, no significant difference was seen in patient survival rate for HCVAb carriers between the two groups (83.2% vs 82.9% at 10 years, and 74.7% vs 70.7% at 20 years, P = .8195). Our results confirmed that HCV infection has a negative impact on the long-term survival of renal transplant patients who receive either a CsA-based or an AZA-based regimen, suggesting that CsA does not have a positive impact on HCV carriers.