Glyoxal acid-free (GAF) histological fixative is a suitable alternative to formalin: results from an open-label comparative non-inferiority study

Formalin, an aqueous solution of formaldehyde, has been the gold standard for fixation of histological samples for over a century. Despite its considerable advantages, growing evidence points to objective toxicity, particularly highlighting its carcinogenicity and mutagenic effects. In 2016, the European Union proposed a ban, but a temporary permission was granted in consideration of its fundamental role in the medical-diagnostic field. In the present study, we tested an innovative fixative, glyoxal acid-free (GAF) (a glyoxal solution deprived of acids), which allows optimal tissue fixation at structural and molecular level combined with the absence of toxicity and carcinogenic activity. An open-label, non-inferiority, multicentric trial was performed comparing fixation of histological specimens with GAF fixative vs standard phosphate-buffered formalin (PBF), evaluating the morphological preservation and the diagnostic value with four binary score questions answered by both the central pathology reviewer and local center reviewers. The mean of total score in the GAF vs PBF fixative groups was 3.7 ± 0.5 vs 3.9 ± 0.3 for the central reviewer and 3.8 ± 0.5 vs 4.0 ± 0.1 for the local pathologist reviewers, respectively. In terms of median value, similar results were observed between the two fixative groups, with a median value of 4.0. Data collected indicate the non-inferiority of GAF as compared to PBF for all organs tested. The present clinical performance study, performed following the international standard for performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices, highlights the capability of GAF to ensure both structural preservation and diagnostic value of the preparations.

Blood pressure, glycemic status and advanced liver fibrosis assessed by transient elastography in the general United States population

OBJECTIVE

Few studies investigated the role of different predictors of advanced liver fibrosis in unselected populations. Here, we estimate the prevalence of steatosis and fibrosis in the general United States population by means of transient elastography and evaluate the impact of blood pressure (BP) and diabetes on disease severity.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of United States adults participating in the 2017-2018 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Participants underwent a transient elastography examination, and liver steatosis and fibrosis were estimated through the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) score and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), respectively.

RESULTS

Four thousand, three hundred and seventy-one participants had reliable transient elastography and BP readings. Steatosis (CAP ≥ 248 dB/m), advanced fibrosis (LSM ≥ 9.6 kPa) and cirrhosis (LSM ≥ 13 kPa) were present in 56.9, 5.5 and 2.9% of participants, respectively. After controlling for potential confounders, risk of steatosis increased proportionally going from participants with optimal (reference) to those with normal [odds ratio (OR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.86], high normal (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.97) and elevated BP (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.21-2.21), whereas no significant association was found between BP status and liver fibrosis. Conversely, presence of diabetes increased the risk of both steatosis (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.49-3.11) and advanced fibrosis (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.36-3.72).

CONCLUSION

Liver steatosis and fibrosis are highly prevalent in the multiethnic United States adult population, raising concerns for future incidence of cirrhosis and its complications. BP status was associated with a progressively higher risk of steatosis, whereas obesity and diabetes were consistently associated with both steatosis and fibrosis.

Lack of awareness of liver organ damage in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

Liver steatosis, a typical finding in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of the present study is to estimate the awareness of liver disease among patients with T2D and whether it differs according to the degree of liver fibrosis estimated by transient elastography (TE).

METHODS

This is a population-based cross-sectional study. We included all patients with T2D that participated in the 2017-2018 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and underwent a TE examination. Presence of liver steatosis and fibrosis was assessed by the median values of controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurement, respectively.

RESULTS

Among the 825 patients included in the analysis, 8.1% (95% CI 5.1%-12.7%) of patients with steatosis were aware of having a liver condition. Even if awareness increased proportionally with increasing severity of organ damage, it remained limited even among patients with advanced fibrosis (17.9%, 95% CI 8.8%-33.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing evidence of a frequent hepatic involvement associated with poor prognosis, awareness of suffering of advanced liver disease in patients with T2D is remarkably low, likely reflecting little recognition also among the team of health care professionals.

Prevalence of Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis Detected by Transient Elastography in Adolescents in the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is common among adolescents, but the prevalence of significant fibrosis in this age group is not known. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of MAFLD and significant (≥F2) fibrosis by transient elastography (TE) in adolescents in the United States.

METHODS

We analyzed TE data from participants 12-18 years old included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-2018 (data available from 867 adolescents). Steatosis was evaluated by the median controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and fibrosis by median liver stiffness measurement.

RESULTS

Two-hundred forty participants (24.16%; 95% CI, 21.07-27.24) had any degree of steatosis (CAP≥248 dBm), 123 participants (11.6%; 95% CI, 9.19-14.06) had S3 steatosis (CAP≥280 dBm), and 51 participants (4.4%; 95% CI, 2.51-6.33) had significant fibrosis (liver stiffness ≥7.4 kPa). Multivariate analyses revealed that body mass index (odds ratio [OR] per unit increase, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4), sex (OR female vs male participants , 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7), ethnicity (OR, Hispanic vs non-Hispanic white, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.7-11.8), and hypertension (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.3-9.9) were associated with S3 steatosis, whereas body mass index (OR, 1.1 per unit increase; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and ethnicity (OR, non-Hispanic black vs non-Hispanic white, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.2-13.2) were associated with significant fibrosis. High proportions of participants with fibrosis were in the normal weight category (35%) and had normal levels of alanine aminotransferase (78%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of MAFLD and significant fibrosis are alarmingly high in adolescents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-2018. Levels of alanine aminotransferase and blood biomarkers do not correctly identify adolescents with more advanced disease. Effective noninvasive strategies to differentiate simple steatosis from progressive forms are urgently needed.

High Prevalence of Advanced Liver Fibrosis Assessed by Transient Elastography Among U.S. Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an important risk factor for the progression of metabolic liver disease to advanced fibrosis. Here, we provide an estimate of the prevalence of steatosis and fibrosis in U.S. adults with T2DM on the basis of transient elastography (TE) and identify factors associated with these conditions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of U.S. adults with T2DM participating in the 2017-2018 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey who were evaluated by TE. Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were diagnosed by the median value of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), respectively.

RESULTS

Among the 825 patients with reliable TE examination results, 484 (53.7%) were assessed using the M probe and 341 (46.3%) using the XL probe. Liver steatosis (CAP ≥274 dB/m), advanced fibrosis (LSM ≥9.7 kPa), and cirrhosis (LSM ≥13.6 kPa) were present in 73.8% (95% CI 68.5%-78.5%), 15.4% (95% CI 12.2%-19.0%), and 7.7% (95% CI 4.8%-11.9%) of patients, respectively. The mean ± SE age of patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis was 63.7 ± 2.2 years and 57.8 ± 1.6 years, respectively. In the multivariable logistic regression model, BMI, non-Black race, and ALT levels were independent predictors of steatosis; and BMI, non-Black race, and AST and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase levels were independent predictors of advanced fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of both liver steatosis and fibrosis is high in patients with T2DM from the United States and obesity is a major risk factor. Our results support the screening of these conditions among patients with diabetes.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Advanced Fibrosis in US Adults Across Blood Pressure Categories

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is common in patients with hypertension but controversy exists as to whether screening for this condition should be performed. Here, we evaluate the prevalence of NAFLD and advanced fibrosis in US adults across blood pressure categories and estimate the number of patients who require referral to hepatologists. In this cross-sectional analysis of 11 489 adults from the 2005 to 2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, participants were segregated as having optimal, normal, high normal, and elevated blood pressure according to the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/Hypertension guidelines. NAFLD was defined using the US fatty liver index, whereas fibrosis was assessed using the NAFLD fibrosis score, fibrosis-4, and Hepamet Fibrosis Score. NAFLD prevalence increased progressively from optimal (16.5%) to normal (34.5%), high normal (39.9%), and elevated blood pressure (50.2%, P<0.001). Patients with hypertension also showed a higher prevalence of advanced fibrosis (3%-9%, based on the specific biomarker used). When the screening flowchart from the European Association for the Study of the Liver, Diabetes, and Obesity guidelines was applied to patients with hypertension, 26.7% needed referral to hepatologists. Risk of referral was higher in Hispanic patients and those with diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and an altered urinary albumin excretion. NAFLD is highly prevalent in US adults with hypertension and a quarter of them would need to be referred to hepatologists because of a high risk of advanced fibrosis. While future studies on cost-effectiveness are needed, screening for NAFLD in these patients could be beneficial.

A double-blind comparison of nimesulide and mefenamic acid in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections in children

The efficacy and safety of nimesulide suspension were evaluated in comparison with mefenamic acid in a double-blind multicentre study that recruited 100 children with acute respiratory tract infections. On entry, each child was randomly allocated to receive either nimesulide 5 mg/kg/day or mefenamic acid 5 mg/kg divided into 2 or 3 daily doses as an oral suspension, for a period of 3 to 10 days. Body temperature returned to normal on the third day for most of the nimesulide-treated patients, but only on the fifth day for the mefenamic acid group. There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) between the antipyretic activity of nimesulide and that of mefenamic acid. Furthermore, treatment with nimesulide was associated with clinically significant improvement in all inflammatory signs and symptoms observed (rhinorrhoea, nasal obstruction, pharyngeal redness, swelling of lymph nodes and cough). Adverse effects considered possibly related to treatment were recorded for 3 patients treated with nimesulide and 1 with mefenamic acid.

Nimesulide granules for the treatment of acute inflammation of the ear, nose or throat

The efficacy of nimesulide (100mg twice daily) was compared with that of naproxen (500mg twice daily) in 53 adult patients with nonbacterial acute inflammation of the ear, nose or throat in a double-blind phase III clinical investigation. Both drugs were administered orally after meals for a mean duration of 8.7 days. In this setting, nimesulide was associated with relief of pain and inflammatory signs (exudation and swelling). Indeed, treatment with nimesulide led to clinical improvement superior to that obtained with naproxen in terms of both rapidity of action and improvement of the symptoms at the end of therapy. Nimesulide therapy was also very well tolerated and no patient reported an adverse event. In contrast, 2 naproxen-treated patients reported episodic gastralgia of moderate intensity.

Controlled clinical investigation of acute analgesic activity of nimesulide in pain after oral surgery

A double-blind study was conducted to determine the dose-effect relationship of nimesulide and to compare the acute analgesic activity of this agent with that of placebo and niflumic acid. Patients undergoing extraction of an impacted third molar were randomised into 4 groups (nimesulide 100mg; nimesulide 200mg; niflumic acid 250mg and placebo). They were instructed to take their allocated treatment after the onset of pain, and to record the pain severity and relief during the following 6 hours. 134 patients were evaluated. There were significant differences between groups for each time of observation/efficacy parameter (Kruskal-Wallis test). Pairwise comparison (Duncan's test) showed that all 3 active medications were significantly different from the placebo. No substantial differences were found between any of the active treatments. Analogous results were obtained when the amount of rescue drug used (paracetamol) was compared. More positive judgements were reported by patients treated with an active compound than by those taking placebo.

Analysis of uterine contractility after administration of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug nimesulide

To study the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on uterine contractility in different parts of the uterus and on the direction and velocity of propagation of the activity, intra-uterine pressure (IUP) was measured simultaneously in 10 dysmenorrheic and 5 eumenorrheic patients with two microtransducer catheters at two locations (30 mm apart) before and after taking nimesulide, a newly developed NSAID. The uterus developed higher pressure cycles in the fundus than in the isthmus, in both eumenorrheic and dysmenorrheic conditions. Nimesulide did not affect either the active pressure (AP) or the direction and velocity of propagation of the activity, though it alleviated pain significantly. In dysmenorrheic patients, resting pressure (RP) is at a high level only in the fundus. The velocity of propagation ranged from 12 to 19 mm/s. The mathematical probability of procervical activity (1.0 if all procervical; 0.0 if all profundal), and thus the transport, was 0.59 in eumenorrheic and 0.68 in dysmenorrheic patients, the average for the whole series being 0.65. The luminal content (menstrual blood) moves in the cervical direction much more slowly than would be expected on the basis of simple calculations of velocity (velocity vector) of propagation.

Distribution of oral nimesulide in female genital tissues

Nimesulide is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent which has proved to be effective in reducing menstrual discomfort in dysmenorrhoeaic women. To determine the concentrations of this drug in the uterus (fundus, cervix), oviduct, and ovaries and to correlate these findings with plasma concentrations, a single oral dose of 100 mg nimesulide was administered 1 to 6 h before surgery to 12 women undergoing hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, mainly for fibroids. Tissue samples were taken, concentration of nimesulide measured by HPLC, and findings compared with plasma concentrations. One patient not undergoing treatment served as control. Nimesulide concentration in the tissues studied was highest 3 h after administration, as expected from the drug's pharmacokinetic profile. The highest tissue/plasma ratio (0.5) was also found at that time. Average tissue concentrations at 1, 2, 3, and 6 h after drug intake ranged from 0.3 to 1.8 micrograms g-1, and plasma concentrations from 2.6 to 4.1 micrograms ml-1. Nimesulide was evenly distributed in the tissues studied.

Antipyretic effects of nimesulide in paediatric practice: a double-blind study

A double-blind, multi-centre study was carried out in 42 hospitalized children, aged 6 months to 8 years, suffering from acute respiratory tract infections with fever, to investigate the antipyretic activity of nimesulide. On entry, patients were allocated at random to receive either nimesulide oral suspension, 5 mg/kg/day divided into 3 daily doses, for 5 days or placebo. Both groups were treated simultaneously with antibiotics: children under 5 years of age received 100 mg amoxycillin/kg/day, those over 5 years received 40 to 50 mg erythromycin/kg/day. Measurements of rectal temperature before and during the 6 hours after the first dose of nimesulide showed a significant mean decrease from a baseline value of 38.89 +/- 0.74 degrees C to 37.28 +/- 0.76 degrees C at 6 hours. In the placebo group, no significant changes were observed between baseline (38.82 +/- 0.67 degrees C) and the 6-hour value (38.28 +/- 1 degree C). Morning temperatures remained within the normal range on the following days. Nimesulide was well tolerated. The results indicate that nimesulide has a prompt antipyretic effect which may well be clinically helpful before the correct antibiotic therapy is effectively established.

Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic study with nimesulide suppositories in children with post-operative pain and inflammation

The pharmacokinetic pattern of 100 mg nimesulide administered rectally at different times prior to undergoing minor surgery was studied in 45 children. Absorption of nimesulide was relatively fast, a peak plasma concentration of 75 mg/l being reached 3 h after administration, and the elimination half-life was 3.15 h. The efficacy and tolerability of the nimesulide suppositories were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, dipyrone-controlled study of 50 children suffering from moderate to severe post-operative pain, the drugs being administered one to three times daily as required; 26 patients received nimesulide and 24 dipyrone. A consistent reduction in pain was recorded during nimesulide therapy given for a mean period of 2.5 days, with a mean consumption of 3.5 suppositories. Similar results were obtained in dipyrone-treated patients. The efficacy of both drugs was judged by the physicians to be good or very good in 70% of cases and there were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in the dosage required or the pain relief. Tolerability of both drugs was excellent, with only one patient in each treatment group complaining of nausea.

Antipyretic activity of nimesulide suppositories: double blind versus diclofenac and placebo

The acute antipyretic activity of nimesulide 200 mg suppositories was tested in a double-blind trial using diclofenac 100 mg suppositories as active reference drug and placebo as blank reference. Eighty-one patients (52 males and 29 females) aged between 18 and 90 years (mean 65 +/- 16.4), with fever of various etiology entered the study. Body temperature, heart rate and blood pressure were recorded before the drug administration and than after 30, 60, 90, 120, 240 and 360 minutes. Nimesulide proved to be as effective as diclofenac in normalizing body temperature and fever related objective signs (heart rate and arterial pressure), significantly shortening fever duration with respect to placebo. The tolerability of both treatments was in general good: 3 cases of nimesulide group (10%) and 4 cases of diclofenac group (17%) complained of slight and transitory side effects. No side effects were complained in the placebo group.